DOCSLIB.ORG

The Controversy Over Climate Change in the Public Sphere

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE CONTROVERSY OVER CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE by WILLIAM MOSLEY-JENSEN (Under the Direction of Edward Panetta) ABSTRACT The scientific consensus on climate change is not recognized by the public. This is due to many related factors, including the Bush administration’s science policy, the reporting of the controversy by the media, the public’s understanding of science as dissent, and the differing standards of argumentation in science and the public sphere. Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth was produced in part as a response to the acceptance of climate dissent by the Bush administration and achieved a rupture of the public sphere by bringing the technical issue forward for public deliberation. The rupture has been sustained by dissenters through the use of argument strategies designed to foster controversy at the expense of deliberation. This makes it incumbent upon rhetorical scholars to theorize the closure of controversy and policymakers to recognize that science will not always have the answers. INDEX WORDS: Al Gore, Argument fields, Argumentation, An Inconvenient Truth, Climate change, Climategate, Controversy, Public sphere, Technical sphere THE CONTROVERSY OVER CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE by WILLIAM MOSLEY-JENSEN B.A., The University of Wyoming, 2008 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2010 © 2010 William Mosley-Jensen All Rights Reserved THE CONTROVERSY OVER CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE by WILLIAM MOSLEY-JENSEN Major Professor: Edward Panetta Committee: Thomas Lessl Roger Stahl Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2010 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people that made this project possible through their unwavering support and love. First and foremost I would like to thank my wonderful wife, Mary for always being there with a smile when I needed it and also the occasional plate of cookies. Second, I would like to thank my parents, Steve and Michele Jensen, who have long provided me with unconditional support in all of my pursuits. Without them, nothing that I do now would be possible. In the pursuit of my education here at the University of Georgia I have been blessed to have wonderful instructors who have challenged and guided my thinking. I would like to thank Barb Biesecker, Roger Stahl, Thomas Lessl, Kelly Happe, and Jennifer Samp for all taking the time to listen to my ramblings in class and to help me better understand what this discipline is all about. I would also like to extend special gratitude to Roger Stahl and Thomas Lessl for agreeing to read and critique the work that I have produced. In the pursuit of this project one individual deserves special recognition. My advisor Dr. Edward Panetta has provided me with guidance and advice not only on this document, but also on a wide array of other issues and I would not be the scholar nor the individual that I am today were it not for his tireless support. Thank you all. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1 THE PUBLIC AND THE CONTROVERSY................................................................1 Introduction to the Study ...........................................................................................1 Area of Inquiry ..........................................................................................................5 Review of Source Material ........................................................................................9 Outline of Chapters .................................................................................................18 2 AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH AS RUPTURE IN THE CONTROVERSY .............28 The Terrain of the Rupture ......................................................................................28 Conditions for the Rupture ......................................................................................30 Navigating the Terrain .............................................................................................36 Dissenter Response ..................................................................................................40 3 SCIENTIFIC AND PUBLIC ARGUMENT IN THE CONTROVERSY ...................49 The Disjunction between Scientific Consensus and Public Perception ..................49 The Theory of Climate Change Dissent in the Public Sphere .................................53 The Practice of Climate Change Dissent in the Public Sphere ...............................57 Media and the Climate Change Controversy ..........................................................64 4 SCIENTIFIC NARRATIVE, DISSENT, AND INTELLIGENT DESIGN ................70 The Importance of Demarcation for Science ..........................................................70 Galileo, Dissent, and Scientific Identity ..................................................................72 vi Intelligent Design and Climate Change Dissent ......................................................81 5 Rhetorical Scholars, Policymakers, and Future Research ...........................................89 Summation of Suggestions for Primary and Secondary Audiences ........................89 Suggestions for Rhetorical Scholars ........................................................................90 Suggestions for Policymakers and Scientists ..........................................................95 Directions for Future Research ................................................................................99 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................101 1 Chapter One: The Public and the Controversy I. Introduction to the Study With the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the drawdown of that nuclear threat, one issue represents an existential threat to human and non-human life. Drastic climate change could turn the Earth into a desolate lifeless planet1, and even conservative estimates predict that we are likely to see rising sea levels, weather unpredictability, and temperature increases around the globe.2 These effects of climate change are likely to decrease agricultural output, displace populations, and severely impact trade and economic growth around the world.3 Communicating the threat that climate change represents is complicated by the presence of an ongoing controversy over the status of the science of climate change, effectively preventing policymakers from moving forward on the issue. Despite the scientific nature of climate change, there are diverse views expressed by a wide array of individuals in the public sphere. Most notably, Al Gore‘s film An Inconvenient Truth explicitly attempts to persuade the public that there is a scientific consensus that climate change is human-induced. A number of celebrities have also brought their opinion about climate change to the public. In 2006 Brad Pitt, Keanu Reeves, Alanis Morrissette, and Leonardo DiCaprio all narrated videos that support action to stop climate change.4 Scarlett Johansson and David Attenborough have become involved by signing a letter drafted by Oxfam that urges the 1 Brandenburg and Paxson 1999 2 EPA 2009 3 Milbrath 1994 4 Vergano 2006 2 United Nations to take action on climate change.5 These celebrities are speaking out in the public sphere about what seems to be a scientific issue, a technical debate. The perceived necessities of the interventions into the public sphere on a settled technical debate are what this project concerns itself with. This project will progress through five chapters. This first chapter provides an explanation of the intended audiences for this study, its area of inquiry, scope and limits. Namely, the focus on the controversy over climate change science as it is currently presented to the American public. This chapter reviews the major source material including general controversy and argumentation theory and specific literature about the climate change controversy. The review includes an analysis and assessment of the general importance of each piece as it relates to the overall project. It also includes a detailed introduction of the next four chapters. There are two audiences that may find this project useful in their scholarly and political life. The primary audience are rhetorical theorists and critics who find that they have an interest in science policy controversies specifically, or argumentation and controversy theory more generally. For this audience this project can inform future research on the subject by locating common characteristics of scientific dissent and its public representation. By tracing the evolution of argument strategies that are commonly used in presenting scientific dissent to the public, this project provides a template for assessing future science policy controversies. The secondary audience consists of the rhetorical practitioners whose argumentation is the subject of this project. For public policy policymakers, commentators and scientists seeking to relate scientific information to the public this project provides a useful foundation for crafting effective messages. For these groups, understanding the effective presence of their 5 Gray 2008 3 argumentation and its interplay with other controversies should help them craft a more cohesive argument strategy. Chapter two
Recommended publications
  • The Importance of Collective Visual Memories in the Representations In

    The Importance of Collective Visual Memories in the Representations In

    Capturing the Void: The Importance of Collective Visual Memories in the Representations in Documentary Films on September 11, 2001 Jodye D. Whitesell Undergraduate Honors Thesis Department of Film Studies Advisor: Dr. Jennifer Peterson October 24, 2012 Committee Members: Dr. Jennifer Peterson, Film Studies Dr. Melinda Barlow, Film Studies Dr. Carole McGranahan, Anthropology Table of Contents: Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Part I: The Progression of Documentary Film Production………………………………… 9 Part II: September 11, 2001….…………………………………………………………….. 15 Part III: The Immediate Role of the Media………………………………………………... 18 Part IV: Collective Memories and the Media,,,……………………………………………. 25 Part V: The Turn Towards Documentary…………………………………….……………. 34 (1) Providing a Historical Record…………………………………….……………. 36 (2) Challenging the Official Story…………………………………………………. 53 (3) Memorializing the Fallen………………………………………………………. 61 (4) Recovering from the Trauma…………………………………………………... 68 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………. 79 Works Cited………………………………………………………………………………... 83 2 Abstract: Documentary films have long occupied a privileged role among audiences as the purveyors of truth, offering viewers accurate reproductions of reality. While this classification is debatable, the role of documentaries as vehicles for collective memory is vital to the societal reconstructions of historical events, a connection that must be understood in order to properly assign meaning to the them. This thesis examines this relationship, focusing specifically on the documentaries produced related to trauma (in this case the September 11 attacks on the United States) as a means to enhance understanding of the role these films play in the lives and memories of their collective audiences. Of the massive collection of 9/11 documentaries produced since 2001, twenty-three were chosen for analysis based on national significance, role as a representative of a category (e.g.
  • Roles for Socially-Engaged Philosophy of Science in Environmental Policy

    Roles for Socially-Engaged Philosophy of Science in Environmental Policy

    Roles for Socially-Engaged Philosophy of Science in Environmental Policy Kevin C. Elliott Lyman Briggs College, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, and Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University Introduction The philosophy of science has much to contribute to the formulation of public policy. Contemporary policy making draws heavily on scientific information, whether it be about the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments, the pros and cons of different economic policies, the severity of environmental problems, or the best strategies for alleviating inequality and other social problems. When science becomes relevant to public policy, however, it often becomes highly politicized, and figures on opposing sides of the political spectrum draw on opposing bodies of scientific information to support their preferred conclusions.1 One has only to look at contemporary debates over climate change, vaccines, and genetically modified foods to see how these debates over science can complicate policy making.2 When science becomes embroiled in policy debates, questions arise about who to trust and how to evaluate the quality of the available scientific evidence. For example, historians have identified a number of cases where special interest groups sought to influence policy by amplifying highly questionable scientific claims about public-health and environmental issues like tobacco smoking, climate change, and industrial pollution.3 Determining how best to respond to these efforts is a very important question that cuts across multiple
  • Breaking the Siege: Guidelines for Struggle in Science Brian Martin Faculty of Arts, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522 Bmartin@Uow.Edu.Au

    Breaking the Siege: Guidelines for Struggle in Science Brian Martin Faculty of Arts, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522 [email protected]

    Breaking the siege: guidelines for struggle in science Brian Martin Faculty of Arts, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522 http://www.bmartin.cc/ [email protected] When scientists come under attack, it is predictable that the attackers will use methods to minimise public outrage over the attack, including covering up the action, devaluing the target, reinterpreting what is happening, using official processes to give an appearance of justice, and intimidating people involved. To be effective in countering attacks, it is valuable to challenge each of these methods, namely by exposing actions, validating targets, interpreting actions as unfair, mobilising support and not relying on official channels, and standing up to intimidation. On a wider scale, science is constantly under siege from vested interests, especially governments and corporations wanting to use scientists and their findings to serve their agendas at the expense of the public interest. To challenge this system of institutionalised bias, the same sorts of methods can be used. ABSTRACT Key words: science; dissent; methods of attack; methods of resistance; vested interests Scientists and science under siege In 1969, Clyde Manwell was appointed to the second chair environmental issues?” (Wilson and Barnes 1995) — and of zoology at the University of Adelaide. By present-day less than one in five said no. Numerous environmental terminology he was an environmentalist, but at the time scientists have come under attack because of their this term was little known and taking an environmental research or speaking out about it (Kuehn 2004). On stand was uncommon for a scientist. Many senior figures some topics, such as nuclear power and fluoridation, it in government, business and universities saw such stands can be very risky for scientists to take a view contrary as highly threatening.
  • Documentarists and Documentary/Narrative Filmmakers Those Listed Are Directors, Unless Otherwise Noted

    Documentarists and Documentary/Narrative Filmmakers Those Listed Are Directors, Unless Otherwise Noted

    1 COM 321, Documentary Form in Film & Television 1/15/14 Documentarists and Documentary/Narrative Filmmakers Those listed are directors, unless otherwise noted. Documentary/Narrative Filmmakers—Many have done both: Name & Key Documentaries Key Narrative Works Nation Allen, Woody Zelig, 1983 (mockumentary) Annie Hall, 1977 US Manhattan, 1979 Altman, Robert The James Dean Story, 1957 M*A*S*H, 1970 US The Player, 1992 Short Cuts, 1993 Anderson, Lindsay Thursday’s Children, 1954 (with Guy if. , 1968 Britain Brenton) O Lucky Man!, 1973 Anger, Kenneth Kustom Kar Kommandos, 1963 Fireworks, 1947 US Scorpio Rising, 1964 Apted, Michael The Up! series (1970‐2012 so far) Gorillas in the Mist, 1988 Britain Nell, 1994 The World is Not Enough, 1999 Brakhage, Stan The Act of Seeing with One’s Own Dog Star Man, 1962 US Eyes, 1971 Mothlight, 1963 Bunuel, Luis Las Hurdes (Land Without Bread), Un Chien Andalou, 1928 (with Salvador Spain/France 1933 (mockumentary?) Dali) L’Age D’Or, 1930 The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie, 1972 Cameron, James Expedition Bismarck, 2002 Titanic, 1997 US Ghosts of the Abyss, 2003 Avatar, 2009 Capra, Frank Why We Fight series, 1942‐44 Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, 1936 US Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, 1939 It’s a Wonderful Life, 1946 Chukrai, Grigori Pamyat, 1971 Ballad of a Soldier, 1959 Soviet Union Cooper, Merian C. Grass: A Nation’s Battle for Life, 1925 The Four Feathers, 1929 US (with Ernest B. Schoedsack) King Kong, 1933 Chang: A Drama of the Wilderness, 1927 (with Ernest B. Schoedsack) Demme, Jonathan Stop Making Sense,
  • Professor Daniel A. Nathan "These Days, Sports May Be What Americans AM 234, American Sports/American Culture Talk About Best

    Professor Daniel A. Nathan "These Days, Sports May Be What Americans AM 234, American Sports/American Culture Talk About Best

    Professor Daniel A. Nathan "These days, sports may be what Americans AM 234, American Sports/American Culture talk about best. With the most knowledge. The TLC 301, WF 10:10-11:30 AM most passion. The most humor. The most Office: TLC 300 (580-5023) distance. The most capacity for a cheerful Office Hours: WF, 2:00-3:30 & by appt. change ofmind. When we meet someone for E-mail: [email protected] the first time, it's no accident that sport becomes the subject so often and so quickly. Yes it's an easy, superficial topic-if we want it to be. But talking about sports has also become one of our best ways ofprobing people, sounding their depth, listening for resonances, judging their values." -Thomas Boswell, sports columnist "Sport is a mirror. Sport is life. Through sport we might know ourselves." -David Guterson, writer Course Description & Objectives This course examines the history of American sports and some aspects of the contemporary athletic landscape as a way to consider cultural values. Sports fans beware: this is not a course in sports trivia, nor is it intended to glamorize the games we watch and play. Rather, we will attempt to situate American sports historically and culturally, paying close attention to issues of commercialization, race/ethnicity, gender, and class, among other subjects, such as globalization and fandom. Employing an interdisciplinary approach that makes use ofprimary documents, history, journalism, economics, anthropology, sociology, and film, we will examine recurrent cultural values expressed via American sports and iconic athletes. This course is not intended as a comprehensive survey of American sports.
  • Dissent and Heresy in Medicine: Models, Methods, and Strategies Brian Martin*

    Dissent and Heresy in Medicine: Models, Methods, and Strategies Brian Martin*

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Social Science & Medicine 58 (2004) 713–725 Dissent and heresy in medicine: models, methods, and strategies Brian Martin* Science, Technology and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia Abstract Understandingthe dynamics of dissent and heresy in medicine can be aided by the use of suitable frameworks. The dynamics of the search for truth vary considerably dependingon whether the search is competitive or cooperative and on whether truth is assumed to be unitary or plural. Insights about dissent and heresy in medicine can be gained by making comparisons to politics and religion. To explain adherence to either orthodoxy or a challenging view, partisans use a standard set of explanations; social scientists use these plus others, especially symmetrical analyses. There is a wide array of methods by which orthodoxy maintains its domination and marginalises challengers. Finally, challengers can adopt various strategies in order to gain a hearing. r 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Dissent; Heresy; Orthodoxy; Medical knowledge; Medical research; Strategies Introduction challenges to it, there is a tremendous variation in ideas, support, visibility and outcome. The conventional view is that the human immunode- What is the best term for referringto a challengeto ficiency virus, HIV, is responsible for AIDS. But for orthodoxy? Wolpe (1994) offers an illuminating many years, a few scientists have espoused the incom- typology of internal challenges. One type of challenge patible view that HIV is harmless and is not responsible is to ‘‘knowledge products’’ such as disease for AIDS (Duesberg, 1996; Maggiore, 1999). The issue prognoses that question current knowledge—namely, came to world attention in 2001 when South African what are considered to be facts—while operating President Thabo Mbeki invited a number of the so- within conventional assumptions about scientific meth- called HIV/AIDS dissidents to join an advisory panel.
  • Southeastern Ohio's Soldiers and Their Families During the Civil

    Southeastern Ohio's Soldiers and Their Families During the Civil

    They Fought the War Together: Southeastern Ohio’s Soldiers and Their Families During the Civil War A Dissertation Submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Gregory R. Jones December, 2013 Dissertation written by Gregory R. Jones B.A., Geneva College, 2005 M.A., Western Carolina University, 2007 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by Dr. Leonne M. Hudson, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Bradley Keefer, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Members Dr. John Jameson Dr. David Purcell Dr. Willie Harrell Accepted by Dr. Kenneth Bindas, Chair, Department of History Dr. Raymond A. Craig, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................iv Introduction..........................................................................................................................7 Chapter 1: War Fever is On: The Fight to Define Patriotism............................................26 Chapter 2: “Wars and Rumors of War:” Southeastern Ohio’s Correspondence on Combat...............................................................................................................................60 Chapter 3: The “Thunderbolt” Strikes Southeastern Ohio: Hardships and Morgan’s Raid....................................................................................................................................95 Chapter 4: “Traitors at Home”:
  • Scientists Dissent List

    Scientists Dissent List

    A SCIENTIFIC DISSENT FROM DARWINISM “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.” This was last publicly updated April 2020. Scientists listed by doctoral degree or current position. Philip Skell* Emeritus, Evan Pugh Prof. of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University Member of the National Academy of Sciences Lyle H. Jensen* Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Biological Structure & Dept. of Biochemistry University of Washington, Fellow AAAS Maciej Giertych Full Professor, Institute of Dendrology Polish Academy of Sciences Lev Beloussov Prof. of Embryology, Honorary Prof., Moscow State University Member, Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Eugene Buff Ph.D. Genetics Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences Emil Palecek Prof. of Molecular Biology, Masaryk University; Leading Scientist Inst. of Biophysics, Academy of Sci., Czech Republic K. Mosto Onuoha Shell Professor of Geology & Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Univ. of Nigeria Fellow, Nigerian Academy of Science Ferenc Jeszenszky Former Head of the Center of Research Groups Hungarian Academy of Sciences M.M. Ninan Former President Hindustan Academy of Science, Bangalore University (India) Denis Fesenko Junior Research Fellow, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia) Sergey I. Vdovenko Senior Research Assistant, Department of Fine Organic Synthesis Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences (Ukraine) Henry Schaefer Director, Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry University of Georgia Paul Ashby Ph.D. Chemistry Harvard University Israel Hanukoglu Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Chairman The College of Judea and Samaria (Israel) Alan Linton Emeritus Professor of Bacteriology University of Bristol (UK) Dean Kenyon Emeritus Professor of Biology San Francisco State University David W.
  • Documentary Movies

    Documentary Movies

    Libraries DOCUMENTARY MOVIES The Media and Reserve Library, located in the lower level of the west wing, has over 9,000 videotapes, DVDs and audiobooks covering a multitude of subjects. For more information on these titles, consult the Libraries' online catalog. 10 Days that Unexpectedly Changed America DVD-2043 56 Up DVD-8322 180 DVD-3999 60's DVD-0410 1-800-India: Importing a White-Collar Economy DVD-3263 7 Up/7 Plus Seven DVD-1056 1930s (Discs 1-3) DVD-5348 Discs 1 70 Acres in Chicago: Cabrini Green DVD-8778 1930s (Discs 4-5) DVD-5348 Discs 4 70 Acres in Chicago: Cabrini Green c.2 DVD-8778 c.2 1964 DVD-7724 9/11 c.2 DVD-0056 c.2 1968 with Tom Brokaw DVD-5235 9500 Liberty DVD-8572 1983 Riegelman's Closing/2008 Update DVD-7715 Abandoned: The Betrayal of America's Immigrants DVD-5835 20 Years Old in the Middle East DVD-6111 Abolitionists DVD-7362 DVD-4941 Aboriginal Architecture: Living Architecture DVD-3261 21 Up DVD-1061 Abraham and Mary Lincoln: A House Divided DVD-0001 21 Up South Africa DVD-3691 Absent from the Academy DVD-8351 24 City DVD-9072 Absolutely Positive DVD-8796 24 Hours 24 Million Meals: Feeding New York DVD-8157 Absolutely Positive c.2 DVD-8796 c.2 28 Up DVD-1066 Accidental Hero: Room 408 DVD-5980 3 Times Divorced DVD-5100 Act of Killing DVD-4434 30 Days Season 3 DVD-3708 Addicted to Plastic DVD-8168 35 Up DVD-1072 Addiction DVD-2884 4 Little Girls DVD-0051 Address DVD-8002 42 Up DVD-1079 Adonis Factor DVD-2607 49 Up DVD-1913 Adventure of English DVD-5957 500 Nations DVD-0778 Advertising and the End of the World DVD-1460
  • From De-Ba'athification to Daesh: Analyzing the Consequences Of

    From De-Ba'athification to Daesh: Analyzing the Consequences Of

    From De-Ba’athification to Daesh: Analyzing the Consequences of U.S. Policy in Iraq C. J. Dijkstra S1357298 Supervisor: Dr. T. Nalbantian August 2017 Leiden University Faculty of Humanities MA Middle-Eastern Studies: Modern Middle-Eastern Studies Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts 2 Table of contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 State of the field ....................................................................................................................... 6 Pattern of organization ............................................................................................................ 8 Theoretical framework .......................................................................................................... 10 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 – Ottomans and Ba’athists: Historical context of Iraq ................................................. 12 1.1 A brief history of Iraq .......................................................................................................... 12 The Ottoman Empire ............................................................................................................. 12 The British Mandate era ........................................................................................................ 14 Iraq from 1979-2003 ............................................................................................................
  • Sbchinn 1.Pdf

    Sbchinn 1.Pdf

    The Prevalence and Effects of Scientific Agreement and Disagreement in Media by Sedona Chinn A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Communication) in The University of Michigan 2020 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor P. Sol Hart, Chair Professor Stuart Soroka Professor Nicholas Valentino Professor Jan Van den Bulck Sedona Chinn [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6135-6743 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of my grandma, Pamela Boult. Thank you for your unending confidence in my every ambition and unconditional love. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for the support of the Dow Sustainability Fellows Program, which provided much appreciated spaces for creative research and interdisciplinary connections. In particular, I would like to thank the 2017 cohort of doctoral fellows for their support, feedback, and friendship. I would also like to thank the Department of Communication and Media, the Center for Political Studies at the Institute for Social Research, and Rackham Graduate School for supporting this work. I truly appreciate the guidance and support of excellent advisors throughout this endeavor. Thanks to my advisors, Sol Hart and Stuart Soroka, for all of their long hours of teaching, critique, and encouragement. Know that your mentorship has shaped both how I think and has served as a model for how I Would like to act going forward in my professional life. Thanks to Nick Valentino and Jan Van den Bulck for your invaluable comments, insistence that I simplify experimental designs, and for your confidence in my Work. I truly appreciate all the ways in which your support and guidance have both improved the work presented here and my thinking as a researcher.
  • 12Th & Delaware

    12Th & Delaware

    12th & Delaware DIRECTORS: Rachel Grady, Heidi Ewing U.S.A., 2009, 90 min., color On an unassuming corner in Fort Pierce, Florida, it’s easy to miss the insidious war that’s raging. But on each side of 12th and Delaware, soldiers stand locked in a passionate battle. On one side of the street sits an abortion clinic. On the other, a pro-life outfit often mistaken for the clinic it seeks to shut down. Using skillful cinema-vérité observation that allows us to draw our own conclusions, Rachel Grady and Heidi Ewing, the directors of Jesus Camp, expose the molten core of America’s most intractable conflict. As the pro-life volunteers paint a terrifying portrait of abortion to their clients, across the street, the staff members at the clinic fear for their doctors’ lives and fiercely protect the right of their clients to choose. Shot in the year when abortion provider Dr. George Tiller was murdered in his church, the film makes these FromFrom human rights to popular fears palpable. Meanwhile, women in need cuculture,lt these 16 films become pawns in a vicious ideological war coconfrontnf the subjects that with no end in sight.—CAROLINE LIBRESCO fi dedefine our time. Stylistic ExP: Sheila Nevins AsP: Christina Gonzalez, didiversityv and rigorous Craig Atkinson Ci: Katherine Patterson fifilmmakingl distinguish these Ed: Enat Sidi Mu: David Darling SuP: Sara Bernstein newnew American documentaries. Sunday, January 24, noon - 12DEL24TD Temple Theatre, Park City Wednesday, January 27, noon - 12DEL27YD Yarrow Hotel Theatre, Park City Wednesday, January 27, 9:00 p.m. - 12DEL27BN Broadway Centre Cinemas VI, SLC Thursday, January 28, 9:00 p.m.