DOCSLIB.ORG

US$6,150,000,000 Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A. 8.5% Senior Notes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US$6,150,000,000 Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A. 8.5% Senior Notes LISTING PARTICULARS US$6,150,000,000 Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. Unconditionally and Irrevocably Guaranteed by PDVSA Petróleo, S.A. 8.5% Senior Notes due 2017 Our 8.5% senior notes due 2017, or the Notes, are being offered by Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A., or PDVSA or the Issuer, a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized under the laws of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, or Venezuela. The Notes will be unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed, or the Guaranty, by PDVSA Petróleo, S.A., or the Guarantor, a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized under the laws of Venezuela that is wholly owned by PDVSA. The Notes and the Guaranty will be the unsecured, senior obligations of the Issuer and the Guarantor and will rank pari passu with all other senior unsecured obligations of the Issuer and the Guarantor, in each case other than obligations granted preferential treatment pursuant to the laws of Venezuela. The Notes will mature on November 2, 2017 and will bear interest at the rate of 8.5% per annum payable semiannually on each May 2 and November 2, commencing on May 2, 2011. Principal payments on the Notes will be payable in three equal installments. The first principal installment will be payable on November 2, 2015, the second will be payable on November 2, 2016 and the third will be payable on the maturity date. The Issuer may redeem the Notes in whole or in part at any time or from time to time by paying the then outstanding principal amount of the Notes and a “make-whole” amount, if applicable plus accrued and unpaid interest. See “Description of the Notes— Redemption.” Investing in the Notes involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8. Price for Notes: 100.00% Concurrently with this offering, we are conducting an offer to exchange up to U.S. $3,000 million principal amount of our U.S. dollar denominated Unsecured Notes due 2011 (ISIN: XS0444611296) validly tendered for up to U.S. $3,375 million principal amount of our U.S. dollar denominated 8% Senior Notes due 2013 unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by PDVSA Petróleo, S.A. We have applied to list the Notes on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and to trade them on the Euro MTF market of such exchange. These listing particulars constitute a prospectus for the purposes of Luxembourg law dated July 10, 2005 on Prospectuses for Securities. Neither the Notes nor the Guaranty have been nor will be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act”, or any state securities laws. The Notes may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. persons, except to “qualified institutional buyers” (as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act) (“QIBs”) in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A and to certain persons in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act. You are hereby notified that sellers of the Notes may be relying on the exemption from the provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A. For a description of certain restrictions on resale or transfer of the Notes, see “Transfer Restrictions” in these listing particulars. The issuance of the Notes has been authorized by the Venezuelan Securities Superintendency (Superintendencia Nacional de Valores) pursuant to Article 2 of the Venezuelan Securities Law (Ley de Mercado de Valores). It is expected that delivery of the Notes will be made in book-entry form through The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), as depositary, for the accounts of its participants including Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (“Euroclear”) and Clearstream Banking, société anonyme, Luxembourg (“Clearsteam”) on or about October 29, 2010. See “Description of the Notes—Book-Entry; Delivery and Form.” US$3,000,000,000 of Notes were issued to a limited number of investors on October 29, 2010. US$3,150,000,000 of Notes were issued to a limited number of investors on January 18, 2011. Sole Lead Arranger and Dealer Manager ____________________ Citi ____________________ March 17, 2011 Table of Contents Page Summary........................................................................................................................................................................1 The Offering ..................................................................................................................................................................5 Risk Factors...................................................................................................................................................................8 Use of Proceeds ...........................................................................................................................................................16 Capitalization...............................................................................................................................................................17 Selected Financial Information....................................................................................................................................18 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ......................................20 Business.......................................................................................................................................................................37 Management and Employees.......................................................................................................................................75 Principal Shareholders.................................................................................................................................................82 Related Party Transactions ..........................................................................................................................................83 Tax Considerations......................................................................................................................................................85 Description of the Notes..............................................................................................................................................90 Dealer Manager .........................................................................................................................................................114 Transfer Restrictions..................................................................................................................................................117 Legal Matters.............................................................................................................................................................120 Independent Auditors ................................................................................................................................................120 Available Information................................................................................................................................................120 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................121 Technical and Regulatory Terms...............................................................................................................................123 Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements........................................................................................................127 These listing particulars have been prepared by us solely for use in connection with the proposed offering of the securities described in these listing particulars. These listing particulars are personal to each offeree and does not constitute an offer to any other person or to the public generally to subscribe for or otherwise acquire securities. You are authorized to use these listing particulars solely for the purpose of considering the purchase of our Notes. In making an investment decision, prospective investors must rely on their own examination of the Issuer and the Guarantor and the terms of the offering, including the merits and risks involved. Prospective investors should not construe anything in these listing particulars as legal, business or tax advice. Each prospective investor should consult its own advisors as needed to make its investment decision and to determine whether it is legally permitted to purchase the securities under applicable legal investment or similar laws or regulations. We have furnished the information in these listing particulars. You acknowledge and agree that, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., or the Dealer Manager, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of such information, and nothing contained in these listing particulars is, or shall be relied upon as, a promise or representation by the Dealer Manager. These listing particulars contain summaries believed to be accurate with respect to certain documents, but reference is made to the actual documents for complete information. All such summaries are qualified in their entirety by such reference. Copies of documents referred to herein will be made available to prospective investors upon request to us or the Dealer Manager. The information set forth or incorporated by reference in these listing particulars is accurate only as of the date of these listing particulars, regardless of the time of delivery
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Judgment of 18 December 2020
    18 DECEMBER 2020 JUDGMENT ARBITRAL AWARD OF 3 OCTOBER 1899 (GUYANA v. VENEZUELA) ___________ SENTENCE ARBITRALE DU 3 OCTOBRE 1899 (GUYANA c. VENEZUELA) 18 DÉCEMBRE 2020 ARRÊT TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE 1-22 I. INTRODUCTION 23-28 II. HISTORICAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND 29-60 A. The Washington Treaty and the 1899 Award 31-34 B. Venezuela’s repudiation of the 1899 Award and the search for a settlement of the dispute 35-39 C. The signing of the 1966 Geneva Agreement 40-44 D. The implementation of the Geneva Agreement 45-60 1. The Mixed Commission (1966-1970) 45-47 2. The 1970 Protocol of Port of Spain and the moratorium put in place 48-53 3. From the good offices process (1990-2014 and 2017) to the seisin of the Court 54-60 III. INTERPRETATION OF THE GENEVA AGREEMENT 61-101 A. The “controversy” under the Geneva Agreement 64-66 B. Whether the Parties gave their consent to the judicial settlement of the controversy under Article IV, paragraph 2, of the Geneva Agreement 67-88 1. Whether the decision of the Secretary-General has a binding character 68-78 2. Whether the Parties consented to the choice by the Secretary-General of judicial settlement 79-88 C. Whether the consent given by the Parties to the judicial settlement of their controversy under Article IV, paragraph 2, of the Geneva Agreement is subject to any conditions 89-100 IV. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 102-115 A. The conformity of the decision of the Secretary-General of 30 January 2018 with Article IV, paragraph 2, of the Geneva Agreement 103-109 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Centralized Federalism in Venezuela
    Duquesne Law Review Volume 43 Number 4 Federalism in the Americas ... and Article 9 Beyond, Part I 2005 Centralized Federalism in Venezuela Allan R. Brewer-Carias Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Allan R. Brewer-Carias, Centralized Federalism in Venezuela, 43 Duq. L. Rev. 629 (2005). Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol43/iss4/9 This Symposium Article is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Duquesne Law Review by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. CENTRALIZED FEDERALISM IN VENEZUELA* Allan R. Brewer-Caria* Federalism in Venezuela reveals a very contradictory form of government. Typically, a Federation is a politically decentralized State organization based on the existence and functioning of autonomous States. The power of that decentralized state organi- zation is distributed among the national State (the Union or the federation) and the member States. In contrast, the Federation in Venezuela is a Centralized Federation, which of course, is a con- tradiction in itself. That is why, unfortunately, my Country is not a good example for explaining "Federalism in the Americas," being as it is a Fed- eration based in a very centralized national government, with 23 formal autonomous states. Each of these 23 formal autonomous states is without their own effective public policies and without their own substantive sub-national constitutions. But our Federation has not always been like it is now. The process of centralization of the Federation progressively occurred during the 20th Century, and has been particularly accentuated during the past five years.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Church in Venezuela, 1810-1930
    UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LIBRARY THIS Vv'u]3^niA5 bttN REVIEWED FOR PRESERVATION. Date: A HISTORY OF THE CHURCH IN VENEZUELA 1810-1930 A HISTORY OF THE CHURCH IN VENEZUELA 1810-1930 BY Mary Watters, Ph.D. PROFESSOR OF HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT ARKANSAS STATE COLLEGE *^^^%^ Chapel Hill The University of North Carolina Press 1933 COPYRIGHT, 1933, BY THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE SEEMAN PRESS, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA ^ ^ TO MY FATHER AND MY MOTHER 119387 PREFACE An interesting and significant feature of the history of the states that resulted from the dissolution of the Spanish Empire in America is found in the differences they present in the evolution of the church. The diversity in the history of this institution is one of the striking evidences of the individuality and differentiation of these Hispanic- American groups. It is suggestive, too, of the decentralization and consequent variations in operation now recognized to have been fundamental characteristics of the Spanish colonial system; for in the colonial background, racial, social, and political, lie the roots of this institutional evolution, whatever may have been the contributions of the national period. Although the progress of anti-clericalism and the operation of other forces have weakened in varying degrees the hold of the church in all Hispanic-American states, in none did the loss of influence fall so early ,^ in none was it so complete as in Venezuela. Indeed, the virtual impotence of the church has been recognized as a peculiar feature of the history of this people which distinguishes it from all other Hispanic-American groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Venezuela Incident and the Attitude of the American People Toward Cleveland's Policy in Venezuela
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1949 The British Venezuela Incident and the Attitude of the American People Toward Cleveland's Policy in Venezuela Jenny Pauline Gerakitis Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Gerakitis, Jenny Pauline, "The British Venezuela Incident and the Attitude of the American People Toward Cleveland's Policy in Venezuela" (1949). Master's Theses. 760. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/760 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1949 Jenny Pauline Gerakitis THE BRITISH VENEZUELA INCIDENT AND THE ATTITUDE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TOWARD CLEVELAND'S POLICY IN VENEZUELA By Jenny Pauline Gerakitis A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulltillment ot the Requirements tor the Degree ot Master ot Arts in Loyola University Chicago. Illinois June. 1949 E TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 CHAPTER I. ORIGIN OF THE BRITISH-VENEZUELA CLAIMS ••••••••••••••••••• 3 Origin of the controversy -- Papal Bull of Pope Alex­ ander VI -- Line of Demarcation -- Treaty of Torde­ aillas -- Voyage of Columbus in 1498 -- Alonso de Ojeda -- Spanish and Dutch settlements -- Diego de Ordaz -- Antonio de Berrio -- Dutch renunoiation of Spanish sovereignty -- Dutch West India Company -­ Treaty of Munster -- Treaty of 1814 -- Vene~uelan Independenoe, July 5, 1811 -- Recognition of Vene­ zuela.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Court of Arbitration Award of The
    PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION THE ORINOCO STEAMSHIP COMPANY CASE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. VENEZUELA ______________________________________________ AWARD OF THE TRIBUNAL ______________________________________________ Official Translation Arbitrators H. Lammasch A.M. F. Beernaert G. de Quesada The Hague, 25 October 1910 [237][1] AWARD OF THE TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION, CONSTITUTED UNDER AN AGREEMENT SIGNED AT CARACAS FEBRUARY 13TH 1909 BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE UNITED STATES OF VENEZUELA, 25 OCTOBER 1910[2] By an Agreement signed at Caracas the 13th of February 1909, the United States of America and of Venezuela have agreed to submit to a Tribunal of Arbitration, composed of three Arbitrators, chosen from the Permanent Court of Arbitration, a claim of the United States of America against the United States of Venezuela; This Agreement states: [3] “The Arbitral Tribunal shall first decide whether the decision of Umpire BARGE, in this case, in view of all the circumstances and under the principles of international law, is not void, and whether it must be considered to be so conclusive as to preclude a re-examination of the case on its merits. If the Arbitral Tribunal decides that said decision must be considered final, the case will be considered by the United States of America as closed; but on the other hand, if the Arbitral Tribunal decides that said decision of Umpire BARGE should not be considered as final, the said Tribunal shall then hear, examine and determine the case and render its decisions on its merits”; In virtue of said Agreement, the two Governments respectively have named as Arbitrators the following Members of the Permanent Court of Arbitration: His Excellency Gonzalo DE QUESADA, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of Cuba at Berlin etc.; His Excellency A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet #1, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2020 February 12, 2020
    VENEZUELA REGIONAL CRISIS FACT SHEET #1, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2020 FEBRUARY 12, 2020 HUMANITARIAN FUNDING NUMBERS AT HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE FOR THE VENEZUELA REGIONAL CRISIS Government of Colombia grants RESPONSE IN FYs 2017–2019 citizenship to children born in Colombia to Venezuelan parents USAID/OFDA1 $117,078,942 4.8 Measles-related deaths in Venezuela USAID/FFP2 $147,117,407 decline by 96 percent in 2019 following million country-wide vaccination campaign State/PRM3 $208,206,327 Estimated Number of Government of Brazil grants refugee Venezuelan Migrants and status to 37,000 Venezuelans Refugees $472,402,676 R4V – February 2020 6.5 million KEY DEVELOPMENTS The 2020 Global Humanitarian Overview, released by the UN in December, requests Projected Number of Venezuelan Migrants and $2.1 billion to support the humanitarian response for the Venezuela regional crisis in Refugees by End of 2020 2020. The appeal includes $750 million for humanitarian efforts in Venezuela to reach R4V – November 2019 3.5 million of the estimated 7 million people in need, and $1.35 billion to reach approximately 4 million crisis-affected individuals across 17 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, as outlined in the 2020 Regional Refugee and Migrant Response Plan $750 for Refugees and Migrants from Venezuela (RMRP). The number of measles-related deaths in Venezuela declined by 96 percent in 2019 million compared to the previous year, following a country-wide vaccination campaign between Funding Requirement for April 2018 and July 2019 that reached nearly 9 million children ages 6 months–15 years, 2020 Humanitarian with funding from USAID/OFDA and other donors.
    [Show full text]
  • OAS Working Group to Address the Regional Crisis Caused by Venezuela’S Migrant and Refugee Flows
    OAS Working Group to Address the Regional Crisis Caused by Venezuela’s Migrant and Refugee Flows Report June 2019 OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Organization of American States. Working Group to Address the Regional Crisis Caused by Venezuelan Migrant and Refugee Flows. Final Report of the OAS Working Group to Address the Venezuelan Migrant and Refugee Crisis in the Region. p. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.D/XV.21) ISBN 978-0-8270-6915-2 1. Venezuela--Emigration and immigration. 2. America--Emigration and immigration. 3. Refugees-- America. 4. Refugees--Venezuela. I. Organization of American States. General Secretariat. II. Working Group to Address the Regional Crisis Caused by Venezuelan Migrant and Refugee Flows. III. Title. IV. Series. OEA/Ser.D/XV.21 WORKING GROUP: David Smolansky: Coordinator Gastão Toledo: Co-coordinator Dany Bahar: Independent Expert James Hollified: Independent Expert Luisa Marín: Research Manager WITH SUPPORT FROM: Marianella Herrera - Cuenca Irene Loreto VOLUNTEERS: Marisela Castillo Leticia Chacón Ernesto Romero Gianinna Romero This report is published thanks to the financial support of the Republic of Korea. © (2019) Organization of American States. All rights reserved under the International and Pan American Conventions. No portion of the content of this material may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, nor by any electronic or any other mean, totally or partially, without the express consent of the Organization. Editing, design and printing: Sigma Editores S.A.S - [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • 48 Festival Internacional De Cine De Huesca / Catélogo Oficial
    La Fundación y el equipo del Festival Internacional de Cine de Huesca quieren dedicar esta edición a la memoria de Javier Brun. Técnico de cultura del Ayuntamineto de Huesca, pionero, culto, generoso y generador de sinergias, redes de colaboración e intercam- bios culturales. Colaborador, defensor y orgulloso de este, que fue también su festival. LIMINAR PRELIMINARY EDITORIAL EDITORIAL scuchaba estos días el testimonio del social, como aportación a la comunidad, un festi- escritor, aventurero y antropólogo Bruce val como el de Huesca. Chatwin, viendo grabar a Werner Herzog, Salimos, esta vez sí, como una edición histórica de Erecogido en el documental NOMAD, visto la que me siento orgulloso. No solo adaptados sino en la edición del D´A Film Festival reconvertida crecidos, desarrollados y materializando algunas a online a través de la plataforma VOD, Filmin: ideas que siempre han estado ahí y que esta malpa- “(…) Es un compendio de contradicciones, enor- rida pandemia ha acelerado. El inminente salto onli- memente duro, aunque vulnerable, afectuoso y ne, obvio para un festival internacional con impacto distante, austero y sensual, no muy adaptado a en todo el mundo, no solo es una forma de combatir las preocupaciones del día a día pero muy eficaz las dificultades físicas, sino también de permitir a bajo condiciones extremas.” mucha gente que queremos y vive fuera poder dis- Responsabilidad, adaptación y oportunidad, frutar del certamen. Esto es completamente com- además de un egoísta instinto de supervivencia. patible con las más de 9000 personas que asistie- Estas son las razones profundas que han llevado ron físicamente a nuestra edición anterior, a las que a todo el equipo de la 48ª edición del Festival esperamos, desde todo el mundo, en cuanto este Internacional de Cine de Huesca a, como se dice maldito bicho nos lo permita.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking China's Energy Strategy with Venezuela
    Linking China’s Energy Strategy with Venezuela: Transnationalization of Chinese NOCs and Geopolitical Implication of China-Venezuela Relations Author: Changwei Tang (10866825) Supervisor: Dr. M. (Mehdi) Parvizi Amineh Second Reader: Prof. Dr. Kurt Radtke Date: 26th June 2015 Master Thesis Political Science: International Relations Research Project: Political Economy of Energy 1 Table of Content Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................... 5 Maps of the Selected Countries .............................................................................................. 6 List of Figures and Tables ....................................................................................................... 8 List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1. Research Design .................................................................................................. 10 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Literature Review .................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.1 Chinese Energy Security ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amelia De Brissot, Ralph Rawdon, Joseph Stackpole and Narcisa De Hammer V
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Claims Commission established under the Convention concluded between the United States of America and Venezuela on 5 December 1885 Cases of Amelia de Brissot, Ralph Rawdon, Joseph Stackpole and Narcisa de Hammer v. Venezuela (the steamer Apure case), opinions of the Commissioners Commission de réclamations constituée en vertu de la Convention conclue entre les États-Unis d’Amérique et le Venezuela le 5 décembre 1885 Affaires concernant Amelia de Brissot, Ralph Rawdon, Joseph Stackpole et Narcisa de Hammer c. Venezuela (cas du vapeur Apure), opinions des Commissaires VOLUME XXIX, pp.240-260 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2012 240 united states/venezuela 3. That the contracts provide a mode of settlement by arbitration for any differences or difficulties that may arise as to their legal validity which is inconsistent with any attempt to make them cause for an international claim on any pretext whatever. 4. That there is no evidence satisfactory to us that the peti tioners’ testator was interested to the extent of one-third of the claim for the damages alleged to have been suffered by the annulment of the said contracts, or that he ever expended any money or incurred any liability, or did anything in execution of the said contracts; and, treating the petitioners represent ing their testator as original claimants, we can discover no ground on which to base an award in their favor. 5. That the evidence seems to indicate very strongly that the petitioners’ testator came into possession of a single cer tificate, which was found among his papers, by purchase, hypothecation, or some other channel than his inter- est in the original claim, and if the petitioners are to be regarded as claiming derivatively in the right of bona fide holders for value under the 9th section of the treaty, the claim must be rejected, because for the reasons stated the original claim itself is with out merit, and falls therefore within the purview of the first article of the supplementary convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    Venezuela I. introduction 439. Having evaluated the human rights situation in Venezuela, the IACHR decided to include Venezuela in this Chapter because it considers that it falls under Article 59(6)(a)(i) of the IACHR’s Rules of Procedure that came into force on August 1, 2013, which establishes as a criterion for the inclusion of a member state in this chapter the existence of “a. a serious breach of the core requirements and institutions of representative democracy mentioned in the Inter-American Democratic Charter, which are essential means of achieving human rights, including: i. there is discriminatory access to or abusive exercise of power that undermines or denies the rule of law, such as systematic infringement of the independence of the judiciary or lack of subordination of State institutions to the legally constituted civilian authority….” 440. On November 22, 2013, the IACHR transmitted to the State a copy of the preliminary draft of this section of its 2013 Annual Report, pursuant to Article 59.10 of its Rules, and asked that it presented its observations within a month. On December 20, 2013, the Commission received the observations and comments of the State which were incorporated, where pertinente, in the instant report. 441. The Commission has identified structural situations, such as changes in the law that create legal and administrative restrictions that affect the exercise and enjoyment of human rights in Venezuela. In its previous reports on Venezuela, the Commission has repeatedly pointed to structural issues such as the practice of appointing provisional, temporary or interim judges and prosecutors, which weakens the judicial branch and strips it of its Independence and impartiality, thereby adversely affecting the right of access to justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Encuentros Cartagena
    ENCUENTROS CARTAGENA Libertad y Orden Libertad y Orden CONTENIDO Mariana Garcés Córdoba MIEMBROS CONSEJO NACIONAL Lina Rodríguez Ministra de Cultura DE LAS ARTES Y LA CULTURA EN Gerente General CINEMATOGRAFIA – CNACC Mónika Wagenberg María Claudia López Sorzano Ministra de Cultura Directora General Viceministra de Cultura Mariana Garcés Córdoba Salvatore Basile Ferrara PRESENTACIÓN 5 Directora de Cinematografía del Presidente Junta Directiva FICCI Enzo Rafael Ariza Ayala Ministerio de Cultura Secretario General Adelfa Martínez Bonilla Hernán Guillermo Piñeres Vicepresidente Delegados de la Ministra de Cultura Junta Directiva FICCI VIII ENCUENTRO INTERNACIONAL DE PRODUCTORES 7 Adelfa Martínez Bonilla Darío Vargas Directora de Cinematografía Paula Duque Junta Directiva FICCI Representante de los Directores Juan Manuel Buelvas IV TALLER DOCUMENTAL (Producción Ejecutiva y Pitching) 31 Argemiro Cortes Julio Enrique Luzardo González Manuel Domingo Rojas Coordinador Grupo Hans Londoño Divulgación y Prensa Representante de los Exhibidores Gilberto Gallego Martín Gerardo Núñez Dirección de Cinematografía Ricardo Vélez Pareja VI VIDEOTECA DEL CINE COLOMBIANO 47 Representante de los Distribuidores Piedad Rojas Román Adriana González William Camilo Peña Moreno Consuelo Castillo Manuel del Cristo Pareja Yenny Chaverra Representante de los Productores Maria Teresa del Castillo II TALLER DE GESTIÓN DE FESTIVALES DE CINE 111 Paula Jaramillo del Corral Franklin Patiño Mario Ramos Vélez Samar Charif Representante de los Consejos Fray Jesus Humberto Ávila
    [Show full text]