Fact Sheet #1, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2020 February 12, 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chronology of the Diplomatic Crisis on March 1 Colombia Launched a Cross-Border Raid Against a FARC Campsite 2K Into Ecuadorian Soil
March 1 – 10, 2008 Chronology of the diplomatic crisis On March 1 Colombia launched a cross-border raid against a FARC campsite 2K into Ecuadorian soil. ‘Raúl Reyes’ syndicated as ‘number two’ of the rebel organisation was killed. Ecuador, Venezuela and Nicaragua broke ties with Colombia, unleashing an unprecedented diplomatic crisis which now seems to be on a normalisation path, following last Friday’s Rio Summit in Dominican Republic. Here’s a summary of highlights and events: DISCLAIMER The summary herewith presented was drafted based entirely on public statements, media and press sources This document DOES NOT reflect an official position of neither this Office nor the UN System in Colombia Please abstain from citing this document in part or as a whole March 1 – 3 * Cross-border raid On March 1, past midnight, Colombian Super Tucano aircraft launched smart bombs on a mobile FARC campsite located 1.8Km into Ecuadorian soil, near the border. FARC’s senior commander ‘Raúl Reyes’ and 16 more rebel fighters were killed in the operation. Colombian forces recovered their corpses in a cross-border raid supported by Black Hawk helicopters –at 04:00h LT. Four hours later, President Uribe contacted Ecuador’s President Rafaél Correa and informed him that the ‘number-two’ FARC commander had been killed in combat by Colombian forces. He made it clear that his aircraft had to fire from the Colombian side into Ecuador to repel fire from the ground (one Colombian soldier was killed in action). To safeguard the bombarded guerrilla camp, Colombian assault forces crossed the border, recovered two dead bodies –‘Raúl Reyes’ and a mid-ranking rebel-, arms and ammunition, and collected evidence material. -
The Water Rights-Based Legal Mobilization of the Wayúu Against the Cercado Dam: an Effective Avenue for Court-Centered Lawfare from Below?*
The Water Rights-Based Legal Mobilization of the Wayúu against the Cercado Dam: An Effective Avenue for Court-Centered Lawfare from Below?* Sergi Vidal Parra** University of Deusto, País Vasco https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda34.2019.03 How to cite this article: Vidal Parra, Sergi. 2019. “The Water Rights-Based Legal Mobilization of the Wayúu against the Cercado Dam: An Effective Avenue for Court-Centered Lawfare from Below?” Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 34: 45-68. https://doi.org/10.7440/ antipoda34.2019.03 Reception date: January 29, 2018; Acceptance date: August 28, 2018; Modification date: September 28, 2018. Abstract: Objective/Context: In recent years, decreasing water availability, accessibility, and quality in the Upper and Middle Guajira has led to the death of thousands of Wayúu people. This has been caused by precipitation 45 deficit and droughts and hydro-colonization by mining and hydropower projects. This study assesses the effectiveness of the Wayúu’s legal mobili- zation to redress the widespread violation of their fundamental rights on the basis of the enforceability and justiciability of the human right to water. Methodology: The study assesses the effects of the Wayúu’s legal mobiliza- tion by following the methodological approach proposed by Siri Gloppen, * This paper is result of two field studies conducted in the framework of my doctoral studies: firstly, PARALELOS a six-month research stay at the Research and Development Institute in Water Supply, Environmental Sanitation and Water Resources Conservation of the Universidad del Valle, Cali (2016-2017); secondly, the participation in the summer courses on “Effects of Lawfare: Courts and Law as Battlegrounds for Social Change” at the Centre on Law and Social Transformation (Bergen 2017). -
AUGUST 2021 Fraser Institute Investment Rankings for 2020 Colombia Ranks First As Country -- Measured by Investment Attractiveness Index
TSX.V: OCG OTCQX: OCGSF DB: MRG1 Focus on Drilling the High-Grade Santa Ana Silver and Gold Project in Colombia AUGUST 2021 Fraser Institute Investment Rankings for 2020 Colombia Ranks First as Country -- Measured by Investment Attractiveness Index Positive Yearly Momentum Colombia First as Country “The most attractive Latin American and Caribbean jurisdictions for mining investment in 2020 were Colombia (28th), followed by Chile (30th), and Peru (34th).” By Fraser Institute Investment Ranking 2020 2 Disclosure and forward-looking statements: Certain statements included in this presentation are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Canadian securities laws, including the following statements: the ability of Outcrop Gold to make discoveries and develop resources; the anticipated economic potential of the concessions; the availability of capital and finance for the Company to execute its commitments and strategy going forward. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions made by the Company in light of its experience and perception of current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that the Company believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Many factors could cause the Company’s results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward looking statements, including: discrepancies between actual and estimated results from exploration and development and operating risks, dependence on early exploration stage concessions; political and foreign risks; uninsurable risks; competition; regulatory restrictions, including environmental regulatory restrictions and liability; currency fluctuations; defective title to mineral claims or property and dependence on key employees. Persons reviewing this presentation are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements due to inherent uncertainty therein. -
UNHCR Colombia Receives the Support of Private Donors And
NOVEMBER 2020 COLOMBIA FACTSHEET For more than two decades, UNHCR has worked closely with national and local authorities and civil society in Colombia to mobilize protection and advance solutions for people who have been forcibly displaced. UNHCR’s initial focus on internal displacement has expanded in the last few years to include Venezuelans and Colombians coming from Venezuela. Within an interagency platform, UNHCR supports efforts by the Government of Colombia to manage large-scale mixed movements with a protection orientation in the current COVID-19 pandemic and is equally active in preventing statelessness. In Maicao, La Guajira department, UNHCR provides shelter to Venezuela refugees and migrants at the Integrated Assistance Centre ©UNHCR/N. Rosso. CONTEXT A peace agreement was signed by the Government of Colombia and the FARC-EP in 2016, signaling a potential end to Colombia’s 50-year armed conflict. Armed groups nevertheless remain active in parts of the country, committing violence and human rights violations. Communities are uprooted and, in the other extreme, confined or forced to comply with mobility restrictions. The National Registry of Victims (RUV in Spanish) registered 54,867 displacements in the first eleven months of 2020. Meanwhile, confinements in the departments of Norte de Santander, Chocó, Nariño, Arauca, Antioquia, Cauca and Valle del Cauca affected 61,450 people in 2020, as per UNHCR reports. The main protection risks generated by the persistent presence of armed groups and illicit economies include forced recruitment of children by armed groups and gender- based violence – the latter affecting in particular girls, women and LGBTI persons. Some 2,532 cases of GBV against Venezuelan women and girls were registered by the Ministry of Health between 1 January and September 2020, a 41.5% increase compared to the same period in 2019. -
Judgment of 18 December 2020
18 DECEMBER 2020 JUDGMENT ARBITRAL AWARD OF 3 OCTOBER 1899 (GUYANA v. VENEZUELA) ___________ SENTENCE ARBITRALE DU 3 OCTOBRE 1899 (GUYANA c. VENEZUELA) 18 DÉCEMBRE 2020 ARRÊT TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE 1-22 I. INTRODUCTION 23-28 II. HISTORICAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND 29-60 A. The Washington Treaty and the 1899 Award 31-34 B. Venezuela’s repudiation of the 1899 Award and the search for a settlement of the dispute 35-39 C. The signing of the 1966 Geneva Agreement 40-44 D. The implementation of the Geneva Agreement 45-60 1. The Mixed Commission (1966-1970) 45-47 2. The 1970 Protocol of Port of Spain and the moratorium put in place 48-53 3. From the good offices process (1990-2014 and 2017) to the seisin of the Court 54-60 III. INTERPRETATION OF THE GENEVA AGREEMENT 61-101 A. The “controversy” under the Geneva Agreement 64-66 B. Whether the Parties gave their consent to the judicial settlement of the controversy under Article IV, paragraph 2, of the Geneva Agreement 67-88 1. Whether the decision of the Secretary-General has a binding character 68-78 2. Whether the Parties consented to the choice by the Secretary-General of judicial settlement 79-88 C. Whether the consent given by the Parties to the judicial settlement of their controversy under Article IV, paragraph 2, of the Geneva Agreement is subject to any conditions 89-100 IV. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 102-115 A. The conformity of the decision of the Secretary-General of 30 January 2018 with Article IV, paragraph 2, of the Geneva Agreement 103-109 B. -
Chapter 8: Colombia
8 Colombia 8.1 Summary of Coal Industry 8.1.1 ROLE OF COAL IN COLOMBIA Coal accounted for eight percent of Colombia’s energy consumption in 2007 and one-fourth of total exports in terms of revenue in 2009 (EIA, 2010a). As the world’s tenth largest producer and fourth largest exporter of coal (World Coal, 2012; Reuters, 2014), Colombia provides 6.9 percent of the world’s coal exports (EIA, 2010b). It exports 97 percent of its domestically produced coal, primarily to the United States, the European Union, and Latin America (EIA, 2010a). Colombia had 6,746 million tonnes (Mmt) of proven recoverable coal reserves in 2013, consisting mainly of high-quality bituminous coal and a small amount of metallurgical coal (Table 8-1). The country has the second largest coal reserves in South America, behind Brazil, with most of those reserves concentrated in the Guajira peninsula in the north (on the country’s Caribbean coast) and the Andean foothills (EIA, 2010a). Its reserves of high-quality bituminous coal are the largest in Latin America (BP, 2014). Table 8-1. Colombia’s Coal Reserves and Production – 2013 Anthracite & Sub-bituminous & Total Global Indicator Bituminous Lignite (million Rank (million tonnes) (million tonnes) tonnes) (# and %) Estimated Proved Coal 6,746.0 0.0 67469.0 11 (0.8%) Reserves (2013) Annual Coal Production 85.5 0.0 85.5 10 (1.4%) (2013) Source: BP (2014) Coal production for export occurs mainly in the northern states of Guajira (Cerrejón deposit), Cesar, and Cordoba. There are widespread small and medium-size coal producers in Norte de Santander (metallurgical coal), Cordoba, Santander, Antioquia, Cundinamarca, Boyaca, Valle del Cauca, Cauca, Borde Llanero, and Llanura Amazónica (MB, 2005). -
Pdf | 271.02 Kb
United Nations S/2019/1017 Security Council Distr.: General 31 December 2019 Original: English Children and armed conflict in Colombia Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report, submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1612 (2005) and subsequent resolutions, is the fourth report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict in Colombia and covers the period from 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2019. The report provides information on the six grave violations against children, on parties to conflict responsible, where identified, and on progress made in the protection of children affected by armed conflict. The reporting period was marked by the implementation of the Final Agreement for Ending the Conflict and Building a Stable and Lasting Peace (S/2017/272, annex II) between the Government of Colombia and the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia-Ejército del Pueblo (FARC-EP), which put an end to a five-decade-long conflict. A decrease in the total number of grave violations against children was documented and can be explained in part by the signature of the peace agreement and the subsequent demobilization of the largest armed group in the country. Over the same period, however, other armed groups expanded their territorial presence, including in areas vacated by FARC-EP, and FARC-EP dissident groups emerged. These developments have continued to expose children to grave violations, in particular recruitment and use and sexual violence. Highlighted in the report are the efforts made by the Government of Colombia to strengthen the framework to respond to, end and prevent grave violations against children, including through prevention strategies. -
FULLTEXT01.Pdf
1 Cover photo: José Ramón Gomez, Arauca, 2012 Front page designed by: Manuela Giraldo 'When an Indigenous People disappears, a whole world is extinguished forever, along with its culture, spirituality, language, ancestral knowledge and traditional practices ... The survival of Indigenous Peoples with dignity is all in our hands.” National Indigenous Organization of Colombia (ONIC) "We are not myths of the past neither ruins in the jungle. We are people and we want to be respected…” Rigoberta Menchu Tum 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 5 PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 7 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Aim and Research Question ............................................................................................ 10 1.2 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Structural Violence ................................................................................................ 11 1.2.2 Civilians Targeted by GAO ML.......................................................................... -
Colombia Page 1 of 21
Colombia Page 1 of 21 Colombia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007 Colombia is a constitutional, multiparty democracy with a population of approximately 42 million. On May 28, independent presidential candidate Alvaro Uribe was reelected in elections that were considered generally free and fair. The 42-year internal armed conflict continued between the government and terrorist organizations, particularly the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN). .The United Self Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC) was demobilized by August, but renegade AUC members who did not demobilize, or who demobilized but later abandoned the peace process, remained the object of military action. While civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces, there were instances in which elements of the security forces acted in violation of state policy. Although serious problems remained, the government's respect for human rights continued to improve, which was particularly evident in actions undertaken by the government's security forces and in demobilization negotiations with the AUC. The following societal problems and governmental human rights abuses were reported during the year: unlawful and extrajudicial killings; forced disappearances; insubordinate military collaboration with criminal groups; torture and mistreatment of detainees; overcrowded and insecure prisons; arbitrary arrest; high number of -
Attacks and Illegal Raids on Homes in Venezuela
NIGHTS OF TERROR: ATTACKS AND ILLEGAL RAIDS ON HOMES IN VENEZUELA 1. INTRODUCTION Venezuela is unquestionably in the midst of an institutional crisis. This situation is closely linked to high levels of impunity and serious problems regarding access to economic, social and cultural rights for the whole population. In this context, Amnesty International’s research has noted the arbitrary actions and measures implemented by the Venezuelan security forces, as well as a worrying and frequently abusive use of force. This is clearly detrimental to the human rights of the entire population. Amnesty International has documented and denounced the Venezuelan authorities’ use of arbitrary detention as a mechanism for political persecution.1 It has also highlighted the practice of carrying out illegal raids and attacks on homes, regardless of people's political views or affiliations, which have had a much wider impact on the population. All these violations are taking place in the context of a policy of repression.2 Amnesty International's research team has received reports of at least 47 raids and attacks on residential areas by state security forces and groups of armed civilians. These incidents occurred in 11 different states between April and July 2017, a period marked by a high level of social conflict with days of demonstrations and frequent protests.3 In response to anti-government protests, the Venezuelan state has on many occasions resorted to using unjustified and disproportionate force. In the period from April to July 2017, more than 120 people were killed and around 1,958 injured, and more than 5,000 people were detained.4 1 Amnesty International, Silenced by force: politically motivated arbitrary detentions in Venezuela (Index: AMR 53/6014/2017). -
Public Information Summary for Rumichaca-Pasto Toll Road
INFORMATION SUMMARY FOR THE PUBLIC RUMICHACA-PASTO TOLL ROAD Host Country(ies) Colombia Name of Borrower(s) An administration and payment trust established for the benefit of Concesionaria Vial Union del Sur S.A.S. Project Description The Project is the design, construction, and operation of an 84- km corridor of a tolled, dual-carriage highway in southwestern Colombia, including expansion of an existing single-carriage corridor to a dual-carriage highway, and construction of 27km of new highway, pursuant to a 29-year concession agreement with the Republic of Colombia. The Project is projected to serve over 6.75 million vehicles per year by 2020, reducing the transit time by half and increasing the safety of passage between the cities of Pasto, the major population center in the region, and Ipiales, near the Rumichaca border crossing to Ecuador. Proposed OPIC $250 million Loan/Guaranty Total Project Costs Approximately $931.8 million U.S. Sponsor J.P. Morgan Foreign Sponsor Sacyr Concesiones Colombia, S.A.S Policy Review U.S. Economic Impact The Project involves the construction of a toll road in Colombia, and therefore is not expected to have a negative impact on the U.S. economy. There is no U.S. procurement associated with this Project, and therefore the Project is expected to have a neutral impact on U.S. employment. The Project is expected to have a neutral U.S. trade balance impact. Developmental Effects The Project is expected to have a highly developmental impact through the construction and operation of an 84-km tolled, dual-carriage highway in Colombia. -
Bogotá, Colombia – Quarterly Report January – March 2008
PROGRAMA CIMIENTOS – BOGOTÁ, COLOMBIA – QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY – MARCH 2008 APRIL 30, 2008 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Management Systems International. PROGRAMA CIMIENTOS – BOGOTÁ, COLOMBIA – QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY – MARCH 2008 Contracted under Task Order Contract: DFD-I-03-05-00221-00 Colombia Regional Governance & Consolidation Program CIMIENTOS DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 II. ACTIVITIES BY COMPONENT AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL .............................. 1 A. Component 1. Improving Citizen Security and Effective State Presence in Health and Education ................................................................................................. 1 B. Component 2: Building governance capacity in targeted regions ............................. 6 C. Cross-cutting component: Civil Society ................................................................. 11 III. ACTIVITIES AND CONTEXT AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL ............................... 14 A. National Level .......................................................................................................... 14 B. Bajo and Medio Atrato ............................................................................................