Dr. Victor Rebrik the History of World Civilization. 1 Vol. 1 the Volume Is Dedicated to the Memory of the Russian Orientalist I.M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dr. Victor Rebrik the History of World Civilization. 1 Vol. 1 the Volume Is Dedicated to the Memory of the Russian Orientalist I.M Dr. Victor Rebrik The history of world civilization. 1 Vol. 1 The volume is dedicated to the memory of the Russian orientalist I.M. Diakonoff (1914- 1999). In the introduction to vol. 1 the author explains his new conception of world history. World history is divided into two parts-primitive society and the history of civilization; only the second of these has a strictly defined development. The history of civilization is divided into 21 periods of 250 years each, beginning from 3050 B.C.E. The author has discovered the historic cycle of 2250 years, which is divided into nine periods of 250 years each; these periods are distributeed in the relation 4: 5 (1000: 1250 years), which forms the "antiquity" and "middle Ages" of each cycle. The "retardation law", according to which a civilization begins in the New World 3000 years later than in the Old World, allows a true consideration of the history of pre-columbian civilizations, which were at the level of the ancient oriental civilizations. The four social-economic formations (early class, slave owners’, feudal and capitalist) are considered by the author; they are not the cause, but the consequence of the historic development. History develops in the spiritual sphere as well, its true aim is to return humanity to the Absolute. Then the author gives a brief outline of pre-civilization (in Egypt, Mesopotamia, Mesoamerica and Southern America), which corresponds to the late stone Age. The first volume is dedicated to the first cycle of history, which is called "archaic" and roughly corresponds to the Bronze Age (in the Old World). The formation is early class (not slave owners’). The first part of this volume is dedicated to early archaic (Early Bronze Age) history. The civilizations of the Old World (Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Elam and Indus valley) are compared with those of Mesoamerica (according to the retardation law). The simultaneous development of the civilizations in each of the periods is considered, with emphasis laid on the progress of world civilization in each period. The second part of the first volume is dedicated to late archaic (Middle Bronze Age) and postarchaic (Late Bronze Age) history. In the late archaic (fifth and sixth periods of the first cycle) it is still possible to draw a comparison with the New World civilizations (including that of Easter Island). The postarchaic history (7th to 9th periods) is different. This stAge of development was not reached by the New World civilizations: because of the European conquest they come immediately to the 3rd cycle (modern history). Here comparison is possible only between the civilizations of the Old World: the "old" civilizations, the "intermediary" (e.g. Hethitic and Ugarit) and the "new" civilizations (Greek, Jewish, Indian 1 Many thanks to Dr. John Blundell for the correction of this resumée. 1 and Chinese), which begin their development at this time. In the postarchaic the "old" civilizations (Egypt, Mesopotamia, Elam) are still in the vanguard of historical development, while the "intermediary" disappear at the end of the cycle ("dark Ages"). The history of world civilization. Vol. 2.Part 1. Тhe volume is dedicated to the memory of the Russian classical philologist А.I.Zaicev (1926- 2000). The first part of this volume considers "antiquity" (the first part of the second cycle), which includes the 10th –13th periods (800 B. C. E.-200 C. E.) and is valid only for the Old World. It corresponds to the Iron Age, the historical formation is slave ownership. Five main “new“ civilizations (Greek, Jewish, Iranian, Indian and Chinese) coexist with the "old" ones (Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Elamic). Тhe development of the new civilizations (main and secondary) and of the old ones is considered in parallel for each period; special attention is given to contacts between the civilizations. In the author´s view, the end of antiquity comes as early as the beginning of the 3rd century C.E. because of the crisis of four great Empires, which divide the world - Roman, Parthian, Kushan and Han. Then follows the first period of medieval history (14th period, 200-450 C.E.), which belongs to part 2 of Vol.2. Volume 2, part 1. Antiquity. Contents. Abstract Introduction. 1 Х. First periof of antiquity (800-550 BCE). 5 1. Tartessos state in 8-6 centuries BCE. 5 2. Etruscans in 8-6 centuries BCE. 6 3. Rome in the time of kings (753-510 BCE). 9 4. Greece in 8-middle of 6 centuries BCE (archaic). Greek colonies. 14 5. Egypt in the time of 23-26 dynasties (828-525 BCE) 28 6. Israel and Judah in 8-6 centuries BCE. 30 7. North-Western and South-Western Semits in 8-6 centuries BCE. 33 8. Urartu in the 9-7 centuries BCE. Phrygia and Lydia in 8-6 c. BCE. 35 9. Assyria in 8-7 centuries BCE. 39 10. Babylonia in 8-6 centuries BCE. 44 11. Elam in 8-6 centuries BCE. 46 12. Media and Persia in 9-6 centuries BCE. 48 2 13. India in 8-6 centuries BCE. 52 14. China in 8-6 centuries BCE. 54 Conclusion to 10th period. 55 ХI period. II period of antiquity-developed antiquity or classics (550-300 BCE). 57 15. CarthAge in 6-4 centuries BCE. 57 16. Rome at the end of 6-4 centuries BCE. 60 17. Greece in the middle of 6-4 centuries BCE. 63 18. Egypt in 525-332 BCE (27-31 dynasties). 73 19. Nubia in 650-300 BCE. 76 20. Persian Empire of Achemenids (550-330 BCE). 79 21. India in the middle of 6-4 centuries BCE. 83 22. China in the middle of 6-4 centuries BCE 88 Conclusion to 11th period. 91 Late antiquity (300 BCE.-200 CE). 93 ХII period. Third period of antiquity, or first period of the late antiquity (300-50 гг. до н.э.). 93 23. Roman republic in 300-50 BCE. 93 24. Hellenistic states in the end of 4-end of 1 century BCE. 100 25. Nubia in 300-50 centuries BCE. 116 26. Judea in 3-1 centuries BCE. 118 27. Persia under Seleucid power and Parthian state in 3-1 centuries BCE. 121 28. India in 4-1 centuries BCE. 124 29. China in 4-1 centuries BCE. 127 Results of 3rd period of antiquity. 132 ХIII. IV period of antiquity (50 BCE-200 CE), 2 period of late antiquity. 134 30. Crisis of the Roman republic and early Roman Empire in the second half of 1century BCE-2 century CE. 134 31. Meroe and Axum in the middle of 1 century BCE-4 century CE. 147 32. Palestine in 63 BCE-200 CE. Origin and propagation of Christianity. 150 33. Parthian state in 50 BCE-227 CE. 155 34. India in 58 BCE-220 CE. 161 35. China in 50 BCE-220 CE. 166 Results of 13th period. 170 Results of antiquity. 171 Bibliography. 196 3 Volume 2, part 2. Middle Ages. Introduction. 180 Early Middle Ages - 200-700. XIV (1) period -200-450 - period of the late Roman Empire. 1. Roman Empire in 193-455. 184 2. Jewish civilization in 200-500 CE. 203 3. Persian state of Sasanians in 224-457. 206 4. India in 200-500. 212 5. China in 221-420 and neighboring countries. 221 Results of 14th (1st) period. 223 Bibliography. 224 4 Introduction. In all historical manuals until now „antiquity“ have been understood as the early phase of the civilization, beginning from Egypt and Sumer and ending with the fall of Western Roman Empire. In the Marxist historiography this time was connected with the domination of the slave ownership system. Sometimes (for example in the books for secondary school) it includes even the primitive society, which has no relation to the civilization. We understand antiquity not as first, but as second phase of the civilization development (precisely speaking, the first part of the second cycle). Not all civilizations entered the phase of antiquity. If archaic (oldest) civilizations were developed in the Old and in the New World, the ancient one were only in the territory of the Old World. In ancient civilizations the work of slaves was really used much more, than in archaic ones, the relations of wares and money and trade being much more developed, but speaking about a special “slave ownership formation” in antiquity, one must be cautious, because in many states the state and common sector was still influential. Antiquity is an “Iron Age” (Hesiod), and the progressive civilizations are really already in the archaeological Age of iron, which gives them the possibilities to reform political and cultural life. In the political field the autoritarian regimes, oligarchic and even “democratic” republics appear. In the field of ideology the world religions and philosophical schools appear, the science has got a theoretical base, the culture flourishes. The civilized world has a tendency to the unification, the “world” Empires are developing. Antiquity, especially the late one – is a time of pluralism, different ideological currents fight each other, the economics is mixed, the politicians try to respect the interests of different groups. The famous “axis time” of Karl Jaspers (800-200 BCE) is also in the epoch of antiquity, in which in the conscience of the representatives of new civilizations the true revolt comes, and because of it the theoretical science, world religions and philosophy are developing. In the antiquity five the most developed civilizations exist – Ancient Greek, Ancient Hebrew, Ancient Persian, Ancient Indian and Ancient Chinese, which have enriched the world with the biggest quantity of philosophical, religious and scientific discoveries, as well as some other new civilizations (Phoenician, Etruscan, Roman etc.).
Recommended publications
  • The Iranian Intervention in the Arab States Affairs: Pretension and Facts
    European Journal of Social Sciences ISSN 1450-2267 Vol. 57 No 2 November, 2018, pp.255-267 http://www.europeanjournalofsocialsciences.com/ The Iranian Intervention in the Arab States Affairs: Pretension and Facts Abdulrahman Al-Fawwaz Associate Professor Department of Humanities, Al-Balqa' Applied University P.O.Box: 15008 Amman 11134 Jordan E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Iran, being one of the dominating super powers in the region has been known for its aggressive role in the entire world. The Arab region is exclusively recognized as its strategic position and the substantial availability of natural resources. In the past and even today, the west world have been protecting the global interest in the region and throughout the history, hostilities have been flaring up that affected the internal stability and peace situation. Among this, the role of Iran is dominated towards its intervention within the Arab States. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the Iranian interventions in the Arab States affairs. It tends to investigate that the specific conflicts created by Iran and the impact of those conflicts towards the peace and stability of the Arab States. The findings of the paper are obtained through secondary analysis and it reveals that the major intervention done by Iran in the Arab States are towards religious affairs, territorial, and security affairs, political and trading affairs. Moreover, the Iranian intervention is now expanded towards the military intervention in the Arab States as well, which is affecting the political stability of the region. As the present political situation is sensitive; therefore, much of the policy implications are considered weaker due to the fulfillment of state interest and security.
    [Show full text]
  • Antik Çağ'da Doğu-Bati Mücadelesi Kapsaminda
    T.C. BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI ESKİÇAĞ BİLİM DALI ANTİK ÇAĞ’DA DOĞU-BATI MÜCADELESİ KAPSAMINDA ROMA-PART İLİŞKİLERİ (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Serhat Pir TOSUN BURSA 2020 T.C. BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI ESKİÇAĞ BİLİM DALI ANTİK ÇAĞ’DA DOĞU-BATI MÜCADELESİ KAPSAMINDA ROMA-PART İLİŞKİLERİ (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Serhat Pir TOSUN Danışman: Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Kamil DOĞANCI BURSA 2020 YEMİN METNİ Yüksek Lisans / Doktora Tezi/Sanatta Yeterlik Tezi/ Çalışması olarak sunduğum “Antik Çağ’da Doğu-Batı Mücadelesi Kapsamında Roma-Part İlişkileri” başlıklı çalışmanın bilimsel araştırma, yazma ve etik kurallarına uygun olarak tarafımdan yazıldığına ve tezde yapılan bütün alıntıların kaynaklarının usulüne uygun olarak gösterildiğine, tezimde intihal ürünü cümle veya paragraflar bulunmadığına şerefim üzerine yemin ederim. 30/03/2020 Adı Soyadı: Serhat Pir TOSUN Öğrenci No:701742007 Anabilim/Anasanat Dalı: Tarih Programı: Tezli Yüksek Lisans Statüsü: Yüksek Lisans Doktora : Sanatta Yeterlik ÖZET Yazarın Adı ve Soyadı : Serhat Pir TOSUN Üniversite : Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Enstitüsü : Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Anabilim Dalı : Tarih Bilim Dalı : Eskiçağ Tarihi Bilim Dalı Tezin Niteliği : Yüksek Lisans Tezi Sayfa Sayısı : xv+156 Mezuniyet Tarihi : …. /…. / 2020 Tez Danışmanı : Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Kamil DOĞANCI ANTİK ÇAĞ’DA DOĞU-BATI MÜCADELESİ KAPSAMINDA ROMA-PART İLİŞKİLERİ MÖ 92 yılında başlayan Roma-Part ilişkileri MÖ 53 yılına kadar dostane bir şekilde devam etmiş, ancak MÖ I. yüzyılda ortaya çıkan Armenia problemi nedeniyle ilişkiler bozulmuştur. MÖ 53 yılında Syria’ya proconsul olarak atanan Romalı General Marcus Licinius Crassus, bir süre sonra Part seferi hazırlıklarına başlamıştır. MÖ 53 yılında sefere çıkan Crassus, Carrhae’de büyük bir hezimete uğramış, kendisi ve oğlu öldürülmüş, lejyon sancağı Part ordusu tarafından ele geçirilmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • ANJ 1991V 17 Images
    Series I Volume XVII, No. 3 September 1991 ^118 ARMENIAN 'EP8lf8‘H’S8iili^ NUMISMATIC ^mtU JOURNAL ARMENIAN NUMISMATIC JOURNAL Series I Vol. XVII. No. 3 September 1991 LETTERS ...My exhibit of bank notes of Armenia, both at the St. Louis and Memphis shows, was very successful and I received a plaque at each show. I am sending you the enclosed pictures from the frames. 5 . Armen Yousseflfi Lenexa, KS I read your article [on Tigranes I] with great Interest. It Is well written and researched and introduces a very interesting new coin. However, I don't agree with Bedouklan's attribution to Tigranes I on the basis of the inscription. The use of C instead of Z In the BACIAEcoC is a late innovation—and the title "PhilheUene" points to a later date. I think it probably is from an obscure mint for Tigranes III [20-8 B.C.]. I don't claim to be an expert on such things and would like to hear from others. The earliest use of C for sigma Z that I can find is on the coins of Phraates III who ruled according to BMC from B.C. 70-57. Somewhat later (38 B.C.) C is used exclusively in Parthian coin inscriptions. I find it strange that Tigranes I and III though separated by almost a century should use the same letters and titles. The use of the title philhellene is not conclusive in dating this coin to 123-90 B.C. Nick Jamgochlan Glendale, CA Author's response: I am not an expert on the epigraphy of ancient Greek coins but here is the result of my research conducted in S.
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDING BOOK Editor: Mehmet Yaman
    rd 3 ICABC 2021 3rd International Congress on Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry PROCEEDING BOOK Editor: Mehmet Yaman 22-26 March 2021-Online-Turkey 1 22-26 March 2021-Online-Turkey 2 3 3rd ICABC 2021 Preface The organizing committee of the 3rd ICABC 2021 would like to welcome all participants to the "3rd International Congress on Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry ", held as online between 22-26 March 2021. The 3rd ICABC 2021 was started two years ago and covers all areas of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry as well as applications of Chemical and Biochemical Analysis. The scientific congress program consists of 10 sessions that include 18 invited and 52 oral presentations as well as 5 virtuals to be presented in the respective sessions. In addition, researchers of Academia (48 universities from 10 countries) and Research Institutes will present up-to-date developments on analytical and bioanalytical chemistry as well as applications to a wide range of environmental, biological and food matrices. We strongly believe that the discussions and the exchange of ideas among the participants during the 5 days of the meeting will make 3rd ICABC a brilliant platform to initiate new research collaborations, particularly in favor of the young scientists participating in the conference. We wish you all to enjoy this conference and have a pleasant to joining, hoping to meet you again during the next ICABCs. With our best regards The Chair (on behalf of Organizing Committee) Prof. Dr. Mehmet YAMAN Firat University, Science Faculty, Department of Chemistry, Elazig-Turkey 4 ICABC 2021 COMMITTEES INVITED SPEAKERS Antony Calokerinos (Athen U/GR) Sezgin Bakirdere (Yildiz Tech.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden, Congress Should Defend Terrorism Sanctions Imposed on Iran
    Research memo Biden, Congress Should Defend Terrorism Sanctions Imposed on Iran By Richard Goldberg, Saeed Ghasseminejad, Behnam Ben Taleblu, Matthew Zweig, and Mark Dubowitz January 25, 2021 During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing to consider Antony Blinken’s nomination for secretary of state, Blinken was asked whether he believed it is in America’s national security interest to lift terrorism sanctions currently imposed on Iran, including sanctions targeting Iran’s central bank, national oil company, financial sector, and energy sector. “I do not,” Blinken responded. “And I think there is nothing, as I see it, inconsistent with making sure that we are doing everything possible – including the toughest possible sanctions, to deal with Iranian support for terrorism.”1 Bipartisan support for terrorism sanctions targeting Iran goes back to 1984, when the United States first designated the Islamic Republic as a State Sponsor of Terrorism. Since then, every U.S. president2 – Republican or Democrat – and Congress have taken steps to reaffirm U.S. policy opposing Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism and tying sanctions relief to Iran’s cessation of terror-related activities. President Joe Biden has pledged to rejoin the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), if Iran returns to “strict compliance” with the agreement.3 Terrorism sanctions on Iran, however, should not be lifted, even if the Biden administration opts to return to the deal, unless and until Iran verifiably halts its sponsorship of terrorism. This memorandum provides an overview of Iran’s past and ongoing involvement in terrorism-related activities, a review of longstanding bipartisan congressional support for terrorism sanctions on Iran, and a list of terrorism sanctions currently imposed on Iran that should not be lifted.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47926-4 — Rumor in the Early Chinese Empires Zongli Lu Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47926-4 — Rumor in the Early Chinese Empires Zongli Lu Index More Information Index abnormal/abnormalities The Blue Sky is dead; the Yellow Sky will decorations and writings, 201 stand, 84–85, 170, 289, 293, 309 disasters, 20–21, 31 Bo, Lady (Empress Dowager), 247–248 heading west, 35 Book of Changes, 50, 68, 103–105 physical characteristics, 181 Book of Documents,8–9, 11, 58, 118, 295 as portentous, 46–52 Book of Great Peace, with Green Headings,84 speech characteristics, 106, 286 Book of Odes, 17, 25–26, 58, 111 of state’s governance, 106 supernatural entities, 293–294 Cai Shu, 9, 11–16, 18, 43 weather, 217 Cai Yong, 85, 166 acceptance (of the people/by the people), Calendar of the Heavenly Official Scripture of 17–23, 283, 291 Great Peace with the Embodiment of the Accounts Clerks, 156, 302 Origin,79–84, 177–178 Ai, Emperor. see Liu Xin Cao Cao, 167–168, 214 Ai Zhang, 183–184, 188 Cao San, 112, 121–122 air currents, 173–176, 215, 217, 249–250, 252, central government supervision mechanism, 260–267, 290, 315 145–150 Allport, Gordon W., vii–viii, 306 Chao Fulin, 171 alternative historical truths, xii Chen Dan, 167–168 An, Emperor. see Liu Hu Chen Fan, 31, 226 apocryphal-prophetic texts. see chen Chen Hsueh-Ping, 8 prophecies Chen Jun, 158 archaic history, 279–281 Chen Ping, 89, 127 aristocratic gossip, 2 chen prophecies authorities’ response to portentous talk, 87, auto-suggestive, 45, 170 318–319 belief in, 206–218 coded chen prophecies, 190–195 Bai Juyi, 14 curses and, 185–186 Ban Biao, 205 defined,
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Victoria Quadrangle (H02), Mercury
    H01 - Borealis Geologic Map of the Victoria Quadrangle (H02), Mercury 60° Geologic Units Borea 65° Smooth plains material 1 1 2 3 4 1,5 sp H05 - Hokusai H04 - Raditladi H03 - Shakespeare H02 - Victoria Smooth and sparsely cratered planar surfaces confined to pools found within crater materials. Galluzzi V. , Guzzetta L. , Ferranti L. , Di Achille G. , Rothery D. A. , Palumbo P. 30° Apollonia Liguria Caduceata Aurora Smooth plains material–northern spn Smooth and sparsely cratered planar surfaces confined to the high-northern latitudes. 1 INAF, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Rome, Italy; 22.5° Intermediate plains material 2 H10 - Derain H09 - Eminescu H08 - Tolstoj H07 - Beethoven H06 - Kuiper imp DiSTAR, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy; 0° Pieria Solitudo Criophori Phoethontas Solitudo Lycaonis Tricrena Smooth undulating to planar surfaces, more densely cratered than the smooth plains. 3 INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Teramo, Teramo, Italy; -22.5° Intercrater plains material 4 72° 144° 216° 288° icp 2 Department of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; ° Rough or gently rolling, densely cratered surfaces, encompassing also distal crater materials. 70 60 H14 - Debussy H13 - Neruda H12 - Michelangelo H11 - Discovery ° 5 3 270° 300° 330° 0° 30° spn Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Parthenope", Naples, Italy. Cyllene Solitudo Persephones Solitudo Promethei Solitudo Hermae -30° Trismegisti -65° 90° 270° Crater Materials icp H15 - Bach Australia Crater material–well preserved cfs -60° c3 180° Fresh craters with a sharp rim, textured ejecta blanket and pristine or sparsely cratered floor. 2 1:3,000,000 ° c2 80° 350 Crater material–degraded c2 spn M c3 Degraded craters with a subdued rim and a moderately cratered smooth to hummocky floor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Wai Kit Wicky Tse University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Tse, Wai Kit Wicky, "Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 589. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Abstract As a frontier region of the Qin-Han (221BCE-220CE) empire, the northwest was a new territory to the Chinese realm. Until the Later Han (25-220CE) times, some portions of the northwestern region had only been part of imperial soil for one hundred years. Its coalescence into the Chinese empire was a product of long-term expansion and conquest, which arguably defined the egionr 's military nature. Furthermore, in the harsh natural environment of the region, only tough people could survive, and unsurprisingly, the region fostered vigorous warriors. Mixed culture and multi-ethnicity featured prominently in this highly militarized frontier society, which contrasted sharply with the imperial center that promoted unified cultural values and stood in the way of a greater degree of transregional integration. As this project shows, it was the northwesterners who went through a process of political peripheralization during the Later Han times played a harbinger role of the disintegration of the empire and eventually led to the breakdown of the early imperial system in Chinese history.
    [Show full text]
  • Untitled Members Are Mere Fwine ;
    Peter Pindar,Esqr ix three Volumes Volume II . CO.A'T. -Y/.V/.17? TJ AN APOLOGETIC POSTSCRIPT 10. EPISTLE TO A FALLING .MINISTER TO ODE UPON ODE 20. SUBJECTS FOR FAINTERS 14. INSTRUCTIONS TO A CELEBRATED. I. 21 EXPOSTULATORY ODES. I LAUREAT 22. A BENEVOLENT EPISTLE TO. L 1$ BROTHER PETER TO BROTHER TOM MASTER JOHN NICHOLS I 16 FETEPS PROPHECY 23. A ROWLAND FOR AN OLIVER 17 PETERS PENSION A SOLEMN EPIS* 24. ADVICE TO THE FUTURE 18. SIR J.BANKS SC THE EMPEROR ... LALTREAT OT MOROCCO •%5 . EPISTLE TO JAMES BRUCE ESQ?.... L., O N 1> O IV. Printed for JOHN WALKED, N.%4,Paternofter Row. M.DCC.XCIV A N APOLOGETIC POSTSCRIPT TO ODE UPON ODE. Priixipibus phcuifie vlris non ultima laus eft. HoiaT The Bard whofe verfe can charm the best of Kings, Perfarmeth tnofi extraordinary things ! Vol. II. B THE ARGUMENT. an Peter nobly acknowledge* error, fufpefteth interfering He Devil, and fupplicateth his Reader— boafteth, wittily a Latin parodieth, and moft learnedly quoteth Poet—He mowethmuch affeftion for Kings, illuftrating it by a beautiful fimile—Peter again waxeth witty—Refolution declared for rhyme in confequence of encouragement from our two Uni versities—Peter wickedly accufed of King-roafting ; re- futeth the malevolent charge by a moft apt illuftration—Peter criticifeth the blunders of the (tars—Peter replieth to the charges brought againlt him by the World—Ke difplayeth great Bible knowledge, and maketh a fhrewd obfervation on King David, Uriah, and the Sheep, fuch as no Commen tator ever made before—Peter challengeth Courtiers to equal h's
    [Show full text]
  • Confrontation in Karabakh: on the Origin of the Albanian Arsacids Dynasty
    Voice of the Publisher, 2021, 7, 32-43 https://www.scirp.org/journal/vp ISSN Online: 2380-7598 ISSN Print: 2380-7571 To Whom Belongs the Land? Confrontation in Karabakh: On the Origin of the Albanian Arsacids Dynasty Ramin Alizadeh1*, Tahmina Aslanova2, Ilia Brondz3# 1Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (ANAS), Baku, Azerbaijan 2Department of History of Azerbaijan, History Faculty, Baku State University (BSU), Baku, Azerbaijan 3Norwegian Drug Control and Drug Discovery Institute (NDCDDI) AS, Ski, Norway How to cite this paper: Alizadeh, R., As- Abstract lanova, T., & Brondz, I. (2021). To Whom Belongs the Land? Confrontation in Kara- The escalation of the Karabakh conflict during late 2020 and the resumption bakh: On the Origin of the Albanian Arsa- of the second Karabakh War—as a result of the provocative actions by the cids Dynasty. Voice of the Publisher, 7, Armenian government and its puppet regime, the so-called “Artsakh Repub- 32-43. lic”—have aroused the renewed interest of the scientific community in the https://doi.org/10.4236/vp.2021.71003 historical origins of the territory over which Azerbaijan and Armenia have Received: December 6, 2020 been fighting for many years. There is no consensus among scientific experts Accepted: March 9, 2021 on this conflict’s causes or even its course, and the factual details and their Published: March 12, 2021 interpretation remain under discussion. However, there are six resolutions by Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and the United Nations Security Council that recognize the disputed territories as Scientific Research Publishing Inc. Azerbaijan’s national territory. This paper presents the historical, linguistic, This work is licensed under the Creative and juridical facts that support the claim of Azerbaijan to these territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Vs. the Moon Mercury Highlights
    12/9/2010 Mercury vs. the Moon Lost planet? Lost moon? What’s the dea l w ith Mercury ? An d w ha t makes it like our moon anyway? Mercury Highlights •Named for the Roman messenger of the gods, because it’s quick •88 day long year •57 day long day (that’s 3 days every 2 years—how old would you be?) •4878 km in diameter •Temp. ranges from -183 C at night to 427 C during the day •58,000,000 km from the sun (1/3 earth’s distance) •Smaller than earth and less massive but almost as dense—what does this tell us? •No satellites •Orbits at 30 mi/s (48 km/s) (earth is 18 mi/s – Kepler was right!) •No atmosphere? (2008) 1 12/9/2010 Mercury Re-viewed 1973 2008 Probes Messenger Achieving Orbit in March 2011 2 12/9/2010 Surface Features - Craters Boethius Polygnotus 83km Craters, complete with ejecta rays. Rays are smaller than on the moon because the higher gravity reduces the distance debris can be thrown. (named for artists/scientists: Shakespeare, Bach, Tolstoy, Mozart, Goethe) More Craters Smooth craters (MESSENGER) Sullivan (Mariner) 3 12/9/2010 Surface Features – Scarps on a Plain Scarps Plains Cliffs That’s one big scarp. 125 miles 4 12/9/2010 Mercury Geology • Scarps – small ridges caused by fast contraction of the planet when semiliquid – Stretch across the planet – 100m to 1.5km high – Sometimes cut through craters, indicating they formed after the craters – Formed when the semimolten planet cooled quickly, shrinking its diameter by 4km.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]