46094-001: Neighborhood Upgrading And

Environmental Monitoring Report

# Annual Report December 2018

Indonesia: Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project – Phase 2

Prepared by the Directorate General of Human Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and Housing for the Republic of Indonesia and the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 30 November 2018)

Currency unit – rupiah currency name in lowercase (Rp) Rp1.00 = $0.00007 $1.00 = Rp14,240

ADB – Asian Development Bank APBD – Anggaran Pendapatan and Belanja Daerah (Regional Budget Income and Expenditure) DGHS – Directorate of Human Settlements

NOTE (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia and its agencies ends on 31 December. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report ______

2017 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT

ADB LOAN 3122-INO: Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project Phase 2 (NUSP-2)

Bridge constructed at Beting Kuala Kapias Neighborhood

Prepared by Directorate General of Human Settlements - Ministry of Public Works and Housing for Asian Development Bank

November 2018

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ...... 2 List of Tables ...... 3 List of Figures ...... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ...... 4 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ...... 5 CHAPTER 2. KEY PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS ...... 7 2.1. Community Contracts ...... 7 2.2. Complex Civil Work Contracts ...... 9 2.3. New Site Development (NSD) ...... 11 CHAPTER 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING STATUS ...... 13 3.1. Requirements of Environmental Safeguards ...... 13 3.2. Key Roles and Responsibilities ...... 13 3.3. Community Contracts ...... 15 3.4. Complex Civil Work Contracts ...... 16 3.5. New Site Development Contracts ...... 16 CHAPTER 4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCUSSION ...... 17 CHAPTER 5. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ...... 18 CHAPTER 6. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ...... 19 CHAPTER 7. PROJECT STAFFING AND CAPACITY BUILDING ...... 21 CHAPTER 8. KEY ISSUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ...... 23 CHAPTER 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 25

APPENDICES

Appendix 1. SPPL of Community Contracts ...... 27 Appendix 2. UKL-UPL and SPPL of Complex Civil Work Contract ...... 29 Appendix 3. UKL-UPL and Environmental Permit for the New Site Development ...... 31 Appendix 4. Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Implementation - Bugul Lor Neighborhood, Pasuruan City ...... 32

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

List of Tables Table 1. Community Contracts Awarded in 2017 ...... 8 Table 2. Complex Civil Works Contracts Awarded in 2017 ...... 10 Table 3. Agency and Community Organization Responsibilities ...... 13 Table 4. Key Issues and the Corrective Actions ...... 23

List of Figures Figure 1. NUSP-2 Project Location ...... 5 Figure 2. Construction of neighborhood road in Muktiharjo Kidul (Semarang City) ...... 7 Figure 3. Construction of drainage system in Kelurahan Dusun Besar (Bengkulu City) ...... 8 Figure 4. Bridge Construction in Kelurahan Beting Kuala Kapias (Tanjung Balai) ...... 10 Figure 5. Progress of NSD Development ...... 12 Figure 6. Grievance Redress Mechanism ...... 19

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank BLH Badan Lingkungan Hidup (Local Environment Office) CA Community Advisor CAP Community Action Plan CC City Coordinator CIO Community Implementing Organization (or BKM Badan Keswadayaan Masyarakat) CPMU Central Project Management Unit DGHS Directorate General of Housing Settlements EA Executing Agency EARF Environmental Review and Assessment Framework EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Management System FY Fiscal Year IEE Initial Environmental Examination IPAL Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah (Communal Wastewater Treatment Plant) KPP Kelompok Pemanfaat dan Pemelihara (Operation and Maintenance Team) LCO Local Coordinating Office MDG Millennium Development Goals MPWH Ministry of Public Work and Housing Muskel Musyawarah Kelurahan (neighborhood assembly meeting) NMC National Management Consultant NSD New Site Development NUSP-2 Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project Phase 2 O&M Operation and Maintenance PIP Pengembangan Infrastruktur Permukiman (Settlement Infrastructure Development) PIU Project Implementing Unit (Satker or Satuan Kerja) PMU Project Management Unit RAB Rencana Anggaran Belanja (Budget Planning) RMC Regional Management Consultant Satker Satuan Kerja (Project Implementing Unit) SKS Survey Kampung Sendiri or Village Survey SPPL Surat Pernyataan Kesanggupan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan (Statement Letter for Environmental Management and Monitoring) TIPP Tim Inti Perencanaan Partisipatif (Core team for Participatory Planning) UKL-UPL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan – Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan (Environmental Management Effort - Environmental Monitoring Effort Document)

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

1. Project Background. The Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project – Phase 2 (NUSP-2) is aimed to upgrade basic public infrastructure in slum settlements, and contribute to meeting Millennium Development Goal (MDG) targets for achieving significant improvement in the lives of slum dwellers (MDG target 7D) and halving the proportion of urban households without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation (MDG target 7C).1 The NUSP-2 also contributes to the implementation of Cities without Slums Program launched by the Indonesian Government.2

2. The NUSP-2 is an ADB-funded project, particularly upgrading and/or developing basic infrastructure and facilities for selected slum areas at 209 neighborhoods (kelurahan). These neighborhoods are distributed in 20 districts (kabupaten) and municipalities (kota) located across Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Nusa Tenggara and Maluku Islands as shown in Figure 1. The executing agency of the NUSP-2 is the Directorate General of Human Settlements (Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya) of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH).

Kapuas Tanjung Palangkaraya Jabung Barat

Batam

Palembang

Bandar Lampung Kendari

Banjarmasin Makassar Palopo Bone

Bengkulu Ambon

Semarang Tanjung Serang Bima Balai Pekalongan

Sukabumi Pasuruan

Figure 1. NUSP-2 Project Location

1 The 2015 MDG target for the proportion of the urban population living in slums is 6%; in 2011, 12.6% of the urban population lived in slums. The 2015 MDG target for the proportion of households with sustainable access to an improved water source is 75.5%; in 2011, 40.5% of urban households had access to an improved water source, 72.5% had access to basic sanitation. The proportion of households with access to safe water and basic sanitation in slum areas is assumed to be much lower. 2 The Cities without Slums Program is incorporated in the National Long-Term Development Plan, 2005–2025. It aims to reduce slum areas in cities by 2025 by promoting concerted initiatives by the central and local governments, private sector, and civil society.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

3. The NUSP-2 assists the local governments in upgrading and/or developing basic infrastructure and facilities at selected neighborhoods in order to achieve the following: Output 1: Institutional capacities for managing pro-poor urban development strengthened; Output 2: Infrastructure in slum neighborhoods upgraded; and Output 3: New settlements for poor families established.

4. There are seven types of infrastructures and facilities built under the NUSP-2, among others, construction of road, bridge, basic sanitation facilities, and communal wastewater treatment plant; installation of clean water supply and street lighting; and provision of municipal solid waste handling facility and transportation as well as basic fire-fighting equipment.

5. Objective and Scope of the Monitoring Report. This Annual Environmental Monitoring Report is developed by NMC Safeguard Team/Project Management Unit of the NUSP-2 to describe the project activities and associated progress and implementation of the environmental safeguards requirement of the Environmental Review and Assessment Framework (EARF) in 2017. Further, this report describes the compliance status of environmental mitigation and monitoring conducted against the EARF requirements. Corrective actions identified in the ADB Review Mission in 2017, if any, are elaborated in this report to improve compliance in the upcoming year.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 2. KEY PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS 6. This chapter summarizes key project activities and progress associated with the NUSP-2 implementation in 2017. These include the community and complex civil work contracts awarded as well as the construction of neighborhood infrastructure and facilities to be constructed as part of the new site development (NSD) during the reporting period.

2.1. Community Contracts 7. In 2017 the NUSP-2 awarded 208 community contracts for neighborhood upgrading civil works (skala lingkungan) to local Community Implementation Organizations (CIO). Construction works that are considered technically modest and can be conducted by the community without using specialized or heavy equipment qualify for the community-typed contracts mentioned earlier. Figure 2 and Figure 3 are examples of the construction works awarded under the community contract scheme.

Figure 2. Construction of neighborhood road in Muktiharjo Kidul (Semarang City)

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Figure 3. Construction of drainage system in Kelurahan Dusun Besar (Bengkulu City)

Table 1 provides information on 209 community contracts awarded in 2017 as part of the NUSP-2 implementation at 20 cities and districts in Indonesia.

Table 1. Community Contracts Awarded in 2017

Number of No City/District (Province) Neighborhoods Construction and/or Installation Conducted Involved 1 Tanjung Balai City 15 Concrete paved road, drainage system, culvert, and (North Sumatra Province) bridge. 2 Tanjung Jabung Barat 9 Road and drainage system. District (Jambi Province) 3 Palembang City 20 Vase, bench and street lighting. (South Sumatra Province) Concrete paved road, bridge, and solid waste collection area. 4 Bengkulu City 10 Street lighting. (Bengkulu Province) Concrete paved road, drainage channel, retaining wall, and provision of clean water well. 5 Bandar Lampung City 16 Street lighting. (Lampung Province) Concrete paved road, drainage channel, retaining wall, clean water well and toilet. 6 Batam City 6 Concrete paved road and drainage channel. (Riau Islands Province) 7 Sukabumi City 12 Concrete paved road, drainage channel, communal (West Java Province) septic tank and waste water treatment plant, retaining wall, hand dug and bore water wells. 8 Semarang City (Central 17 Concrete road and bridge, drainage channel, public Java Province) toilet, solid waste collection area, and street light installation. 9 Pekalongan City 7 Concrete road, drainage channel, retaining wall, street

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Number of No City/District (Province) Neighborhoods Construction and/or Installation Conducted Involved (Central Java Province) light, and green open space.

10 Pasuruan City 11 Concrete road and bridge, drainage channel, (East Java Province) communal septic tank, and purchase of garbage collector vehicle 11 Serang City 7 Concrete road and bridge, drainage channel, public (Banten Province) toilet, retaining wall, hand-dug well, solid waste collection area, and purchase of garbage collector vehicle 12 Kapuas District (Central 10 Concrete road, wooden bridge, wooden trails road, Kalimantan Province) public toilet, and drainage channel. 13 Palangka Raya City 8 Wooden trails road, concrete and paving road, and (Central Kalimantan drainage channel. Province) 14 Banjarmasin City (South 11 Installation of culvert, concrete road and bridge, and Kalimantan Province) drainage channel. 15 Bima City (West Nusa 9 Drainage channel, concrete road and bridge. Tenggara Province) 16 Bone City (South Sulawesi 4 Drainage channel and concrete road. Province) 17 Makassar City (South 12 Drainage channel, concrete road, and communal Sulawesi Province) septic tank. 18 Palopo City 9 Drainage channel, concrete road, public toilet, retaining (South Sulawesi Province) wall, purchasing of waste bins, installation of clean water pipeline, and green open space 19 Kendari City 10 Concrete road and bridge, wooden road, hand-dug (South East Sulawesi) well, drainage channel, and purchase of garbage motor vehicle. 20 Ambon City 6 Drainage channel, retaining wall, concrete road, and (Maluku Province) purchase of garbage motor vehicle and waste bins. Source: NUSP-2 Management Information System (2017).

2.2. Complex Civil Work Contracts 8. The complex civil work contracts are awarded to companies (instead of community groups) through bidding process, particularly for construction works involving multiple neighborhoods and specific materials and heavy and/or specialized equipment that may need to be mobilized from other areas. In 2017, NUSP-2 awarded complex civil work contracts for constructing facilities and infrastructure in a total of 16 cites and districts in Indonesia. Figure 4 shows the bridge construction awarded under the complex civil work contract.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Figure 4. Bridge Constructed at Kelurahan Beting Kuala Kapias (Tanjung Balai)

9. The types of community facilities and infrastructure constructed or installed in 2017 under the complex civil works contracts at more than 20 neighborhoods (kelurahans) and cities distributed in 13 provinces in Indonesia are presented in the following table.

Table 2. Complex Civil Works Contracts Awarded in 2017

No City/District (Province) Construction and/or Installation Conducted

1 Kelurahan Sungai Pelenggut, Batam City Concrete road and drainage system. (Riau Islands Province). 2 Kelurahan Gunung Sulah, Bandar Asphalt road and drainage system. Lampung City (Lampung Province) 3 Kelurahan Panorama, Bengkulu City Concrete road and drainage system. (Bengkulu Province) 4 Kelurahan Beting Kuala Kapias, Tanjung Concrete road and bridge Balai City (North Sumatra Province) 5 Kelurahan Tungkal II, Tanjung Jabung Drainage system Barat District (Jambi Province) 6 Kelurahan Kaligawe and Meteseh, Paved road, asphalt road and drainage system Semarang (Central Java Province) 7 Kelurahan Sukakarya, Sukabumi city Asphalt road, drainage system, communal IPAL (West Java Province) and public toilet. 8 Kelurahan Mandanrejo and Ngemplakrejo Drainage system, groundwater reservoir. and Pasuruan (East Java Province) 9 Kelurahan Bandengan and Kandang Drainage system, asphalt road, concrete road, Panjang, Pekalongan City (Central Java street lighting and pump house Province)

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

No City/District (Province) Construction and/or Installation Conducted

10 Kelurahan Selat Dalam, Kapuas District, Draiange system, 3R integrated waste (Central Kalimantan Province) management areas, and purchasing of waste containers 11 Kelurahan Dara, Bima City (West Nusa Draianage system and asphalt road Tenggara Province) 12 Kelurahan Lette, Tamarunang and Bunga Eja Paved road, drainage system and perimeter fence Beru, Makassar (South Sulawesi Province) 13 Kelurahan Ponjalae, Palopo (South Sulawesi Drainage system and installation of concrete plate Province) 14 Kelurahan Lalolara, Kendari (South-East Asphalt road, drainage and public open space. Sulawesi Province) 15 Kelurahan Karang Panjang and Rijali, Ambon, Concrete road, pedestrian, drainage system, (Maluku Province) reinforce bridge, retaining Wall, landscaping, communal wastewater treatment plant, and passive hydrant. 16 Kelurahan Lonrae, Bone City (South Sulawesi Concrete bridge and road. Province) Source: NUSP-2 Management Information System (2017).

2.3. New Site Development (NSD) 10. As part of the ADB funding, the NUSP-2 plans to construct neighborhood facilities and infrastructures at four new site developments (NSD) in Purirano (Kendari City), Sampoddo (Palopo City), Handil Berkat (Kapuas District), and Jatiwangi (Bima City). The facilities and infrastructure to be constructed include paving roads, drainage system, clean water supply, solid waste management system and landscape for open green space for the newly built neighborhood. The NSD construction work is also implemented by contracted firms selected through bidding process. As of 2017, some houses in the NSD of Kendari and Palopo Cities have been developed; and land preparation/clearing for the NSD in Kapuas District and Bima City is being progressed.

11. Figure 5 presents the status of four NSD sites as of 2017. The houses in the NSD are developed by the DGHS and local governments.

Purirano NSD

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Sampoddo NSD

Handil Berkat NSD

Jatiwangi NSD

Figure 5. Progress of NSD Development

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING STATUS 3.1. Requirements of Environmental Safeguards

12. According to the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), the NUSP-2 is classified as the Category B Project, i.e. the project could have some adverse environmental impacts, but of lesser degree or significance than those in category A, but the impacts are site specific and can be readily addressed through common mitigation measures. The NUSP-2 creates positive impacts on the environment and improves the wellbeing of the community through alleviation of slum areas in emerging cities in Indonesia.

13. The Environmental Assessment and Review Framework (EARF) document has been prepared in 2014, and it provides screening procedure and checklist to review environmental implications of the infrastructure and facility to be constructed as part of the NUSP-2. The EARF requires that:  An initial environmental examination (IEE) document according to the ADB requirement is prepared and endorsed by DGHS and ADB as part of the new site development (NSD) proposal; and  Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (UKL-UPL) or Statement Letter to Conduct Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring (SPPL) is prepared and endorsed by DGHS according to the Ministry of Environment Regulations No. 5/2012 on Types of Activities and/or Projects Requiring Environmental Impact Assessment (AMDAL) and No. 16/2012 on the Guidance for the Preparation of Environmental Documents; and Ministry of Public Work Regulation No. 10/PRT/M/2008 on Types of Activities and/or Projects in the Public Work Sector Subject to be Completed with the Environmental Management Effort- Environmental Monitoring Effort (UKL-UPL) document.

3.2. Key Roles and Responsibilities

14. Table 3 summarizes the key roles and responsibilities of the executing and implementing agencies as well as community organizations involved in the implementation of the NUSP-2 including their respective environmental responsibilities. Related evidences as an example on the undertaking of these roles and activities, particularly at the city/district level, community implementing organization (CIO), and neighborhood level are included in Appendices 1 to 4.

Table 3. Agency and Community Organization Responsibilities

Institutions and Responsibilities Activities and Status

Directorate General of Housing Settlement (Executing Agency)  Overall coordination, supervision, The Commitment Officer (Satker PPK) of DGHS conducted monitoring. meetings with the NMC’s Team Leader and Safeguard Team to oversee overall implementation of the NUSP-2. The meetings were conducted on ad hoc basis.  Preparation and submission of quarterly The PMU submitted the mentioned quarterly progress and progress and evaluation reports. evaluation reports to ADB.  Prepare guidelines for the The DGHS published a Technical Guideline on Social and environmental due diligence and Environmental Management in September 2016. This guideline is

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Institutions and Responsibilities Activities and Status

monitoring of environmental equipped with forms of checklists and templates to assist the management plan. implementing agencies at local government level to screen, assess and mitigate as well as monitor environmental and social impacts associated with the NUSP-2 intervention. Public Works (Local Coordinating Officer) at City or District Level  Provide overall coordination, In all 20 cities, the LCO at the Local Planning Agency oversees the supervision, monitoring and approval of overall implementation of NUSP-2 intervention, including approval village proposals including of the village proposals. environmental checklists.  Prepare quarterly progress reports The LCO provided inputs to the PMU on the quarterly progress of including environmental. the NUSP-2 intervention. No specific progress and environmental reports are prepared by the LCO.  Provide technical support to community The technical support provided by LCO through consultation and advisors and BKMs/CIOs. coordination when the time BKM/CIO presents their CAP.  Carry out environmental due diligence.  For the community contract, the environmental due diligence was carried out using the environmental screening checklist. Subsequently, this information is utilized to develop the SPPL for submission to the local environmental agency.  For the complex civil work contract, the UKL-UPL and the Environmental Permit are applied for government approval or SPPL is prepared.  For the NSD, IEE and UKL-UPL are prepared for ADB/DGHS endorsement and local government respectively. The list of UKL-UPL, SPPL, and IEE prepared is included in this monitoring report.  Monitor the implementation of the The LCO has not formally monitored or documented the environmental management plan. implementation of environmental management plan. Environmental Agency at City or District Level (Badan Lingkungan Hidup/BLH)  Provide guidance on environmental There is no evident suggesting that the BLH provides guidance on checklists. the implementation of environmental checklist.

 Coordinate with community advisors to Some BLHs conducted site visits to validate the environmental conduct site visits to validate the screening results during the community meeting, but these screening/assessment results. activities are not documented.  Review the engineering design and There is no deep well constructed as part of the NUSP-2. environmental checklists and provide permit for construction of a deep well.  Conduct random checking during This checking has not been undertaken. construction and after completion to inspect environmental procedures and impacts. Health Agency at City or District Level  Test collected water quality samples to This water testing was not conducted, except for Sukabumi City, as determine if collected water sources most of the clean water supply to be constructed for the NSD sites meet the drinking water standards. will be sourced from treated water from the municipality water company (known as Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum or PDAM). Community Implementation Organization (CIO)  Responsible for establishing project The CIO established the project implementing units in the form of implementation units. self-empowered community group (Kelompok Swadaya Masyarakat) to implement the NUSP-2 activities.  Responsible for conducting The CIO, assisted by the CA and CC, conducted environmental environmental checklists assisted by screening by visual inspection and review of the RKM/CAP using

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Institutions and Responsibilities Activities and Status

community advisors/safeguard the forms included in the Technical Guideline for Social and specialist. Environmental Management (2016).

 Formulate O & M mechanisms. The CIO established the O & M group (Kelompok Pemanfaat dan Pemelihara/KPP) to be responsible for maintenance of the neighborhood facility and infrastructure constructed as part of the NUSP-2. However, there is no record or documentation suggesting the conduct of this.  Responsible for monitoring construction The progress of the NUSP-2 intervention was conducted when the activities and conducting inspection for construction activities achieve 63% and 100% progress, and completed interventions. reported to the respective LCO/CC.

 Disclose, on the neighborhood board, The discussion to develop and finalize the neighborhood proposals neighborhood proposals and contracts was conducted through neighborhood discussion (musyawarah including environmental checklists. kelurahan). However, the proposals, contracts, and checklists are not disclosed on the neighborhood board.  Responsible for taking any negative This responsibility was conducted through neighborhood feedback related to site, construction, discussion. and operation from other neighborhood members and organizing meetings to solve problems.  Responsible for reporting environmental The environmental monitoring is reported using the Form SFG-5 monitoring to LCOs completed with the minutes of meeting of the monitoring at 63% and 100% of construction progress. The minutes and pictures of this activity were uploaded into the NUSP-2’ website.

3.3. Community Contracts 15. Environmental Mitigation. Prior to construction, the CIO prepared a Community Action Plans (CAP) including the environmental and social screening using the form/checklist provided in the the NUSP-2 Technical Guidelines on Social and Environmental Management. The CA/CIO then conducted a neighborhood meeting to disseminate and discuss the CAP. The results of the environmental and social screening were incorporated into the SPPL that was subsequently submitted to the local environmental agency (Badan Lingkungan Hidup/BLH) for registration. The SPPL contains identified potential environmental impacts and measures to mitigate these impacts during the construction work. The list of SPPL submitted for the community contract activities is presented in Appendix 1.

16. Some water spraying for dust suppression, covering the construction materials using tarpaulin, and providing the workers with personnel protective equipment as well as other mitigation included in the SPPL were reportedly conducted during the construction activities. However, documentation with this regard is lacking.

17. Environmental Monitoring. The CA/CIO visually monitored the implementation of the mitigation measures to make sure that they complied with the SPPL during the project up to hand over to the LCO and subsequently to the local community as the beneficiary of the NUSP-2. They monitored the progress of infrastructure being built by visual inspection and made some documentation pictures of the progress on 0%; 63% and 100%. These processes

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017 were being uploaded into the website of Management Information System through application by the CA. The City Coordinator would check the uploaded files and gave approval.

18. Subsequently, the Safeguard Regional Management Consultant (based in Palembang, Semarang and Makassar, representing the west, central, and eastern regions of Indonesia) checked and reviewed the status of the process and made some analysis to be reported to the Safeguard Team of NMC. The NMC incorporated this report into the quarterly report and submitted to ADB. However, reporting on the implementation of environmental mitigation during and after the construction activities were not formally documented.

3.4. Complex Civil Work Contracts 19. Environmental Mitigation. The environmental mitigation implemented for the complex civil work contracts is similar to that of the community contract in that SPPL is required for most construction activities of the neighborhood infrastructure and facilities. In few cases, UKL-UPL document is required instead of SPPL for the mentioned activities. The list of UKL-UPL and SPPL submitted for the community contract activities is presented in Appendix 2.

20. Some water spraying for dust suppression, covering the construction materials using tarpaulin, and providing the workers with personnel protective equipment as well as other mitigation included in the SPPL were reportedly conducted during the construction activities. However, documentation with this regard is lacking.

21. Environmental Monitoring. The CCs were responsible for the day-to-day environmental monitoring during the construction activities, in coordination with LCO. Usually, they monitored the progress of infrastructure being built by visual inspection, and made some documentation pictures of the progress (0%; 63% and 100%). The SFG-5 form, provided in the Technical Guideline, was used to do the monitoring for both social and environmental safeguard for each activity. The day-to-day monitoring during the construction activities should be recorded in the logbook. However, reporting on the implementation of environmental mitigation during and after the construction activities were not formally documented.

3.5. New Site Development Contracts 22. In 2017, the construction of infrastructure and facilities at the four NSD sites in Kendari, Palopo, and Bima cities and Kapuas District have not been commenced and, therefore no environmental mitigation and monitoring conducted. The Executing Agency prepared the UKL-UPL and applied for the Environmental Permit as well as submitted the IEE of NSD site in Kendari for ADB review. The status of UKL-UPL and Environmental Permit as well IEE document prepared for the NSD is included in Appendix 3.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCUSSION 23. The NUSP-2 project conducted public consultation as an integral part of the identification, selection and implementation of neighborhood infrastructure interventions. For the community contract packages, several stages of neighborhood meetings were conducted to openly discuss the whole process of development from assessing environmental and social safeguard checklist, formulating and consolidating the investment plan into community action plan (CAP), preparing the construction implementation and selecting the Implementing Unit (Kelompok Swadaya Masyarakat). Through these meetings, all community members and concerned stakeholders would have such forum to raise their complaints to be resolved. So far, there is no report of any concerns or complaints addressed to the Implementing Units.

24. For the complex civil works, at the pre-construction phase, the City Coordinator (CC) and City Satker conducted public consultation with the representatives of local communities, head of Kelurahan, and the contractor firms to discuss the plan for the infrastructure and identifying potential impacts by screening and reviewing the checklist forms and later developed the UKL-UPL or SPPL documents based on the screening results. This event was documented with the minutes of meetings, list of participants, and some pictures, and uploaded unto the MIS website by the CC for public viewers. The community members and concerned stakeholders could have used this forum to raise their complaints to be resolved. So far, there is no report of any concerns or complaints addressed to the related City Satker.

25. As for the NSD sites, at the pre-construction phase, there would be two types of public consultation. The first one is for disseminating information about the NSD project to the local communities, potential beneficiaries, and job or business opportunities for the locals, as well as seeking for local community’s perception on the NSD project. The second one is for discussing and reviewing environmental and social screening checklists to prepare the UKL- UPL document, which later to be further developed as IEE and social DDR documents. This event would be attended by potential affected communities, the head of Kelurahan, related agencies or stakeholders, the contractor firms, the CC and Sub-monev assistant, and facilitated by the City Satker. During this reporting period, there is no public consultation yet conducted for the NSD.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 5. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 26. Information on public consultation, discussion, and neighborhood meetings related to the the implementation of community and complex civil work contracts are documented and uploaded into the NUSP-2’s website (www.nusp2.id). However, information related to monitoring of environmental mitigation measures is lacking.

27. For the NSD, the IEE documents (including the EMP) and the annual environmental monitoring report would be submitted to ADB for disclosure on ADB’s website. These IEE documents would have versions in Bahasa Indonesia and would be made available to public including the affected people and interested stakeholders. As the IEE of NSD is being reviewed by ADB, no such document has been uploaded into ADB’s website.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 6. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 28. The NUSP-2 has established a grievance redress mechanism (GRM), which basically consists of three levels, i.e. at the neighborhood, at the city/district, and at the national levels as shown in Figure 6. This leveling system is expected to timely address any complaints during project implementation. Local communities or affected people will have the right to file complaints and/or queries related to disturbance/environmental impacts due to the project activities.

29. The GRM should handle any complaints and/or queries which emerge during construction process of the subprojects. Any affected people/party will have the right to file complaints. It is anticipated that all grievances related to benefits and other assistance will be resolved at the project level.

30. The procedure for filing complaints and/or grievance during construction is established as follows: (i) The complaint will be filed to the Community Implementing Organization (CIO) or Badan Keswadayaan Masyarakat (BKM) members and local government at the neighborhood level for an immediate solution when possible;

Figure 6. Grievance Redress Mechanism

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

(ii) If the problem cannot be solved, the BKM members and local government staff will facilitate the APs (affected peoples) to submit their complaints to the Projects’s grievance redress committee (GRC) at the district level, and to the national level if needed. Community advisor then will record the complaint and report it to the LCOs. The project will dedicate a staff at city/district and national levels to be in charge of handling and following up on AP’s complaints.

(iii) The members of the GRC should involve the representatives of vulnerable affected people (i.e. affected women, poor and minority groups) and other affected people along with relevant government officials who have functional and legal authority. The committee will then review grievances involving all land acquisition benefits or issues, except for disputes related to ownership.

(iv) Grievances will be addressed within 2 to 4 weeks from the date of filing the complaints at the district level and within 8 weeks at the national levels.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 7. PROJECT STAFFING AND CAPACITY BUILDING 31. The consulting services are provided at the national, regional, city and kelurahan level. At the national level, a team of consultants assist the CPMU, namely the National Management Consultant (NMC) based in Jakarta. Part of this NMC, a safeguard specialist and two technical assistants were recruited to assist the CPMU in preparing social and environmental management guidelines, checking supporting data and documents from the field in the project’s Management Information System (MIS) website, incorporating environmental monitoring in the quarterly progress reports and environmental survey results in the monitoring and evaluation framework, prepare reports on annual environmental monitoring and prepare the IEE for the NSD proposals.

32. At the regional level, a safeguard specialist was also recruited at each of three regional management consultant (RMC) teams, based in Palembang (for West Region), Semarang (Central) and Makassar (East). These RMC safeguard specialist are responsible for assisting the NMC safeguard team in reviewing environmental monitoring management by BKMs/CIOs, reviewing the completion of safeguard documents, preparing the environmental monitoring reports, dissemination of the guidelines, assisting and training the city/district coordinators and community advisors to review the environmental screening carried out by BKMs/CIOs.

33. In addition to each NSD subproject, there are four technical assistants (called as “Sub- monev” consultant) responsible to assist in day-to-day monitoring and evaluation for the implementation of the NSD. This also includes assisting the City Satker, the LCO and the related RMC Safeguard Specialist in collecting data for IEE preparation, and monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures set forth in the EMP of the IEE. They are based in the NSD sites of Kendari, Palopo, Bima, and Kapuas.

34. There are city/district coordinators (CCs) based in 20 cities/districts of the NUSP-2 project, responsible in assisting the city/district Satker (PIU), the LCOs, and the community advisors. The CCs also responsible for conducting review and screening of the environmental and social safeguard checklist using forms of SFG-1 till SFG-5 provided in the Technical Guidelines of NUSP-2, both for community contracts and complex civil work packages. Further, they review the completion of necessary safeguard documents, and review the quality of documentations uploaded by CCs or CIOs/BKMs in the NUSP-2 MIS website.

35. Under the city/district coordinators (CCs), at the kelurahan level there are Community Advisors (CAs) who may cover up to 3 kelurahans, and responsible for assisting each BKM/CIO for day-to-day management of the community contract works; facilitating the establishment of CIO/BKM and user groups; facilitating the preparation of CAPs; providing the community with technical guidance in book-keeping, documentation and report preparation; and assisting the user groups in formulating and implementing facility operation and maintenance. Together with the CCs, the CAs assist the CIO/BKM in reviewing and screening the environmental and social safeguard checklists. The CAs and CCs also responsible for the preparation of documentation of each activity and supporting documents as the evidence, such as minutes of meetings, notes, list of participants, pictures, other related documents. The

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Technical Guidelines of NUSP-2 also provided various document templates for documentation purposes. The CAs and CCs were responsible to assist the CIO/BKM to upload all of these documents and pictures unto MIS website of the NUSP-2 project for further monitoring by the RMC and NMC safeguard specialists for reporting and public disclosure.

36. The capacity building to enhance and refresh the knowledge and skill in managing the safeguard requirements were done through events such as regional coordination meeting, training for trainers and on-the-job trainings. These were held together joining the Capacity Building Team at the NMC and RMC. The reports or proceedings of these events were documented and compiled at PMU and NMC offices

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 8. KEY ISSUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 37. Based on the information presented in this 2017 environmental monitoring report, several key issues or gaps identified about the implementation of environmental mitigation and monitoring against the requirements of EARF of the NUSP-2 (see Table 4). These issues and gaps should be rectified by related executing and implementing agencies through corrective actions and reported in the next annual monitoring report.

Table 4. Key Issues and the Corrective Actions

Party to Implement Key Issues / Gaps Corrective Actions Due Date Corrective Action

Lacking documentation (e.g. Evaluate the environmental DGHS/NPMU Evaluation to be minutes of meeting) on the safeguards implementation conducted monitoring and evaluation of on a regular basis and periodically. environmental safeguards document the results of this implementation at the implementation. Executing Agency The LCOs (local Public Work PMU (assisted by NMC) LCO at respective During site visits, office) have not monitored the should conduct an local Public Work regional workshop or implementation of empowering or capacity offices other ad-hoc events building event for the LCOs to in Q4 of 2018 or Q1 Environmental Management remind them about this of 2019 Plan (EMP) associated with responsibility the community and complex civil work contracts. The Local Environmental The BLHs should undertake PMU/DGHS During site visits and Agencies (BLH) have not yet random checking during LCOs ad-hoc events in Q4 conducted random checking construction and after BLHs of 2018 and Q1 of during construction and after completion of the construction 2019

completion to inspect works. environmental procedures and impacts. There is no record or The CIO/BKM assisted by CC BKM/CIO assisted by Q4 of 2018 for documentation of the O&M and CA should make the CA/CC for community community contracts mechanism formula. record or documentation of contracts. and complex civil the O&M mechanism formula. City/District Satker for works. complex civil works Q4 of 2018 for and for NSDs. Kendari and Palopo NSD. Q1 of 2019 for Bima and Kapuas NSD.

There is no environmental The RMC Safeguard RMC Safeguard Q4 of 2018 and Q1 of safeguard monitoring report specialists and the CCs in Specialists, CCs in 2019 from the RMC to be coordination with City Satker coordination with City incorporated to NMC annual and LCO should prepare Satker monitoring report. regular environmental monitoring reports including any complaints raised before, during and after implementation of construction works. Incomplete SPPL, UKL-UPL The RMC Safeguard RMC Safeguard Q4 of 2018 and Environmental Permit for specialists and the CCs in Specialists, related civil work packages in the coordination with City Satker CCs in coordination

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Party to Implement Key Issues / Gaps Corrective Actions Due Date Corrective Action Palembang City, Tanjung should recheck the process of with respective City Balai City, Sukabumi City, and obtain the incomplete Satker of Palembang, Banjarmasin City and Kendari SPPL and UKL-UPL Tanjung Balai, City documents. Sukabumi, Banjarmasin and Kendari. Incomplete SPPL, UKL-UPL The RMC Safeguard RMC Safeguard Q4 of 2018 and Environmental Permit for specialists and the CCs in Specialists, related complex civil work packages coordination with City Satker CCs in coordination in Bengkulu City and Bone and LCO should recheck the with respective City City process of and obtain the Satker of Bengkulu incomplete SPPL, UKL-UPL and Bone. and Environmental Permit documents.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

CHAPTER 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38. Conclusions. In FY 2017, there were a total of 363 subprojects of NUSP-2 conducted or being planned in 208 neighborhoods (kelurahan) located in 20 cities and districts. These include 208 community contracts (skala lingkungan), 24 complex civil work contracts, and four 4 NSD (new site development) packages in Palopo, Kendari, Kapuas, and Bima cities.

39. As of end of December 2017, almost all of community contracts in the first cycle had completed their SPPL documents, except those from the cities of Ambon and of Palembang, which were still in the registration process at the BLH (Local Office of Environment). Whereas for the complex civil work packages, only 3 of 24 kelurahans have not completed of UKL-UPL documents yet.

40. The implementation of environmental management plan is either hardly implemented or documented in the NUSP-2 implementation. This explains the low compliance level on monitoring reports from the CIOs/BKMs, CAs, CCs and LCOs. Therefore, capacity building activities through learning by doing and close assistance on safeguard compliance should be conducted until the end of the project for the sake of sustainability.

41. Recommendations. As there are some incomplete data or supporting documents required to comply with the Environmental Assessment and Review Framework, the implementation and monitoring activities on this report are still not complied or partially complied. To improve the compliance, in chapter 8 we already identified the pending issues or gaps and the corrective actions that need to be done and reported in the next annual environmental monitoring report. These are:  Ensure that the coordination, supervision and monitoring meetings of the DGHS (Executing Agency) should be well-documented and recorded, supporting with list of participants, notes, minutes and pictures of meeting.  PMU (assisted by NMC) should conduct an empowering or capacity building event for the LCOs to remind them about their responsibility to monitor implementation of environmental management plan associated with community contract and complex civil works.  The Local Environmental Agencies should undertake random checking during construction and after completion of the construction works on the environmental impacts and implementation of environmental management plan.  The CIO/BKM assisted by CC and CA should make the record or documentation of the O&M mechanism formula.  The RMC Safeguard specialists and the CCs in coordination with City Satker and LCOs should prepare regular environmental monitoring reports including any complaints raised before, during and after implementation of construction works.  The RMC Safeguard specialists and the CCs in coordination with City Satker and LCO should re-check and obtain the incomplete SPPL, UKL-UPL for Palembang, Tanjung Balai, Sukabumi, Banjarmasin, Kendari; and Environmental Permit documents for Bengkulu and Bone.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

APPENDICES

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Appendix 1. SPPL of Community Contracts

Number of No City / District (Province) Neighborhoods List of SPPL* for Community Contracts Involved 1 Tanjung Balai city, North 15 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 3 July 2017 Sumatera (siklus 1) Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 18 October 2017 (siklus 2) 2 Tanjung Jabung Barat 9 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 20 June 2017 District (Jambi Province) (siklus 1) 3 Palembang City (South 20 13/20 kelurahan, SPPL telah diterima oleh BLH pada Sumatra Province) December 2017 4 Bengkulu City (Bengkulu 9 8/9 kelurahan, SPPL telah diterima oleh BLH pada Province) bulan October 2017 (siklus 1) SPPL untuk siklus 2 telah diterima oleh BLH pada bulan October dan November 2017 5 Bandar Lampung City 17 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 22 August 2017 (Lampung Province) (siklus 1) Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 7 October 2017 (siklus 2) 7 Batam City (Riau Islands 7 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 19 July 2017 Province) (siklus 1) Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 29 September 2017 (siklus 2) 7 Sukabumi City (West 12 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 19 May 2017 Java Province) (siklus 1) Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 4 September 2017 (siklus 2) 8 Semarang City (Central 17 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 7 November 2017 Java Province) (siklus 1) Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 8 November 2017 (siklus 2) 9 Pekalongan City (Central 7 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 12 June 2017 Java Province) (siklus 1) Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 5 September 2017 (siklus 2) 10 Pasuruan City (East Java 11 Semua SPPL diterima pada July 2017 (siklus 1) Province) Semua SPPL diterima pada October 2017 (siklus 2) 11 Serang City (Banten 7 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 9 November 2017 Province) (siklus 1 dan siklus 2) 12 Kapuas District (Central 10 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 5 June 2017 Kalimantan Province) 13 Palangkaraya City 8 Semua SPPL diterima pada Juny 2017 (siklus 1) (Central Kalimantan Semua SPPL diterima pada 11 October 2017 (siklus Province) 2) 14 Banjarmasin City (South 11 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 27 September Kalimantan Province) 2017 15 Bima City (West Nusa 9 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 7 July 2017 Tenggara Province) (siklus 1) Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 13 September 2017 (siklus 2)

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Number of No City / District (Province) Neighborhoods List of SPPL* for Community Contracts Involved 17 Bone City (South 4 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 25 July 2017 Sulawesi Province) 17 Makassar City (South 12 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 19 July 2017 Sulawesi Province) 18 Palopo City (South 9 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 7 July 2017 Sulawesi Province) (siklus 1) Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 1 September 2017 (siklus 2) 19 Kendari City (South East 10 Semua SPPL diterima pada May 2018 Sulawesi) 20 Ambon City (Maluku 7 Semua SPPL diterima pada 11 August 2017 Province) Note: *SPPL – statement letter to conduct environmental management and monitoring.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Appendix 2. UKL-UPL and SPPL of Complex Civil Work Contract

Construction/ No Neighborhood Environmental Documents and Permits Installation Works 1 Kelurahan Sungai Concrete road and SPPL receipt No. 679/DLH/SPPL/XI/2017 Pelenggut, Batam City drainage system (dated 24 November 2017) issued by the (Kepulauan Riau) DLH of Batam City 2 Kelurahan Gunung Sulah, Asphalt road and drainage  UKL-UPL Recommendation No. Bandar Lampung City, system 660.i/995/III.10/2017 (dated 19 October Lampung. 2017) issued by the DLH of Bandar Lampung City.  No evidence indicating whether the corresponding Environmental Permit has been secured for this construction work. 3 Kelurahan Panorama, Concrete road and SPPL receipt No. 660.1/27/KK.SPPL/DLH- Bengkulu City, Bengkulu drainage system II/IX/2017 (dated 11 September 2017) issued by the DLH of Bengkulu City. 4 Kelurahan Beting Kuala Concrete road and bridge SPPL receipt No. Kapias, Tanjung Balai City, (made of reinforced 660/002/VII/DokLH/DISLH/2017 (dated 3 North Sumatra concrete) July 2017) issued by the DLH of Tanjung Balai City 5 Kelurahan Tungkal II, Drainage system UKL-UPL Recommendation No. Tanjung Jabung Barat 660.4/28/DLH/IX/2017 (dated 13 September District, Jambi 2017) and Environmental Permit No. 660.4/29/DLH/IX/2017 (dated 13 September 2017) by DLH of Tanjung Jabung Barat District 6 Kelurahan Kaligawe and Paved road, asphalt road SPPL receipt No. 658.31/443/DPM- Meteseh, Semarang, and drainage system PTSP/R/XII/2017 (dated 29 December Central Java. 2017) issued by the Dinas Penanaman Modal Terpadu Satu Pintu of Semarang City 7 Kelurahan Sukakarya, Asphalt road, drainage SPPL receipt No. No 660.1/46/SPPL/BID 1- Sukabumi, West Java. system, communal IPAL DLH/2017 (dated 16 May 2017) issued by and public toilet DLH of Sukabumi City 8 Kelurahan Mandanrejo and Drainage system  SPPL receipt No.210/423.110/2017 Ngemplakrejo and (dated 25 July 2017) issued by DLHKP of Pasuruan, East Java. Pasuruan City  SPPL receipt No.211/423.110/2017 Ground Reservoir (dated 25 July 2017) issued by DLHKP of Pasuruan City 9 Kelurahan Bandengan and Drainage system, asphalt SPPL receipt by BLH of Pekalongan City Kandang Panjang, road, and pump house (dated 20 July 2017). Pekalongan City, Central Java Concrete road, street lighting and pump house 10 Kelurahan Selat Dalam, Draiange system, 3R SPPL receipt No. 660/007/Reg/DLH/I/2018 Kapuas District, Central integrated waste (dated 23 January 2018) issued by DLH of Kalimantan management site and Kapuas District purchasing of waste containers 11 Kelurahan Dara, Bima City, Draianage system and SPPL receipt No. 800/60/DLH/XII/2017 West Nusa Tenggara asphalt road (dated 7 July 2017) issued by DLH of Bima City 12 Kelurahan Lette, Paved road and drainage SPPL receipt No.428, 429 and 431 (dated 6 Tamarunang and Bunga system March 2017) issued by BLH of Makassar

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Construction/ No Neighborhood Environmental Documents and Permits Installation Works Eja Beru, Makassar, South City Sulawesi Paved road, drainage SPPL receipt No. 430 by BLH of Makassar system and perimeter fence City, dated 6 March 2017 13 Kelurahan Ponjalae, Drainage system and SPPL receipt No. 012/DLH-SPPL/VIII/2017 Palopo, South Sulawesi installation of plat deucker 14 Kelurahan Lalolara, Asphalt road, drainage and There is no evidence indicating whether Kendari, South East public open space SPPL has been prepared or submitted to Sulawesi the Environmental Agency for this construction work. 15 Kelurahan Karang Panjang Concrete road, pedestrian SPPL receipt No. 660/276/DLHP (dated 31 and Rijali, Ambon, Maluku. and drainage system August 2017) issued by the DLHP of Ambon City dated Reinforce bridge, Retaining There is no evidence indicating whether Wall, Landscape, SPPL or UKL-UPL and Environmental Communal IPAL, and Permit have been prepared or submitted to Passive Hydrant the Environmental Agency. 16 Kelurahan Lonrae, Bone Concrete Bridge/Road There is no evidence indicating whether City, South Sulawesi. SPPL has been prepared or submitted to the Environmental Agency. Note: DLH – Local Environmental Agency (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup)

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Appendix 3. UKL-UPL and Environmental Permit for the New Site Development

No NSD Sites* UKL-UPL IEE

1 Purirano NSD – Kendari  UKL-UPL approval No. 191 year 2016 Submitted to ADB for City (Southeast Sulawesi (dated 29 December 2016), issued by the review in November 2017. Province) Environmental Agency of Kendari City.  Environmental Permit No. 192 year 2016 (dated 29 December 2016) issued by the same environmental agency. 2 Sampoddo NSD – Palopo  UKL-UPL approval No. Being prepared for City (South Sulawesi 660/047/DLH/XII/2017 (dated 16 submission to ADB in Province) December 2017) issued by the 2018. Environmental Agency of Palopo City  Environmental Permit No. 660/48/DLH/XII/2017 (dated 16 December 2017) issued by the same environmental agency. 3 Handil Jaya NSD, Kapuas  UKL-UPL approval No. Not yet developed. District (Central 660/364/DLH/X/2017 (dated 18 October Kalimantan Province) 2017) issued by the Environmental Agency of Kapuas District  Environmental Permit No. 627/DPMPTSP/ year 2017 (dated 29 December 2017) issued by the Head (Bupati) of Kapuas District. 4 Jatiwangi NSD, Bima City  UKL-UPL recommendation No Not yet developed. (West Nusa Tenggara 880/32/DLH/XII/2017 (dated 21 Province) December 2017) issued by the Environmental Agency of Bima City.  Environmental Permit No. 435/2018 (dated 15 May 2018) issued by the Major (Walikota) of Bima City. Source: NSD Technical proposals and copies of UKL-UPL documents from NUSP-2 subprojects 2017. Note: * Construction of neighborhood road, drainage system, clean water supply, solid waste management system, landscape, and street lighting.

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Appendix 4. Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Implementation - Bugul Lor Neighborhood, Pasuruan City

4.A. Use of Form SG-1 to Screen Out Negative Investment List Activities

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Appendix 4.B. SPPL of Kelurahan Bugul Lor, Pasuruan City

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

4.C. Minutes of Meeting on the Project’s Screening Result

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

4.D. Community Meeting in Bugul Lor Neighborhood

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

4.E. Monitoring of Construction Progress

Documentation pictures

LOCATION 2

Construction Work : Paving

Location : RW IV /RT 07

Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

LOCATION 2

Construction Work : Paving

Location : RW IV /RT 07

Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

25%

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

LOCATION 2

Construction Work : Paving

Location : RW IV /RT 07

Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

50 %

LOCATION 2

Construction Work : Paving

Location : RW IV /RT 07

Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

75 %

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

LOCATION 2

Construction Work : Paving

Location : RW IV /RT 07

Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

100 %

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

4.F. Use of Safety Signage during Construction

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

4.G. Minutes of Meeting on Final Inspection upon Completion of Construction Works (100% Progress)

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

4.H. Form SFG-5 Potential Impact and Mitigation Matrix

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017