Fauna Assessment

South West Highway Padbury Hill Stage 2 (SLK 219.345 – 220.900)

Shire of Donnybrook Balingup and Bridgetown Greenbushes

September 2016 Version 1

On behalf of: Main Roads Western Australia Robertson Drive PO Box 5050 BUNBURY WA 6231

Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 E: [email protected]

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION ...... 1

2. SCOPE OF WORKS ...... 2

3. METHODS ...... 3

3.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY - LITERATURE REVIEW ...... 3

3.1.1 Database Searches ...... 3

3.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ...... 3

3.1.3 Existing Publications ...... 4

3.1.4 Fauna of Conservation Significance ...... 5

3.1.5 and Nomenclature ...... 6

3.1.6 Likelihood of Occurrence – Fauna of Conservation Significance ...... 7

3.2 SITE SURVEYS ...... 8

3.2.1 Fauna Habitat Assessment ...... 8

3.2.2 Black Cockatoo Habitat Assessment ...... 8

3.2.2.1 Black Cockatoo Breeding Habitat ...... 9

3.2.2.2 Black Cockatoo Foraging Habitat ...... 10

3.2.2.3 Black Cockatoo Roosting Habitat ...... 10

3.2.3 Other Fauna Species of Conservation Significance ...... 10

3.2.4 Opportunistic Fauna Observations ...... 10

4. SURVEY CONSTRAINTS ...... 11

5. RESULTS ...... 13

5.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY – LITERATURE REVIEW ...... 13

5.2 SITE SURVEYS ...... 13

5.2.1 Fauna Habitat Assessment ...... 13

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

5.2.2 Black Cockatoo Habitat Assessment ...... 15

5.2.2.1 Black Cockatoo Habitat Tree Assessment ...... 15

5.2.2.2 Black Cockatoo Foraging Habitat Assessment ...... 16

5.2.2.3 Black Cockatoo Roosting Habitat Assessment ...... 17

5.2.3 Other Fauna Species of Conservation Significance ...... 18

5.2.4 Opportunistic Fauna Observations ...... 18

5.3 FAUNA INVENTORY – SUMMARY ...... 18

6. LIKELIHOOD OF OCCURRENCE AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...... 20

7. LEGISLATIVE OBLIGATIONS ...... 24

7.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1986 ...... 24

7.2 ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 ...... 25

8. CONCLUSION ...... 27

9. REFERENCES ...... 28

TABLES

TABLE 1: Main Fauna Habitats within the Subject Site

TABLE 2: Summary of Potential Fauna Species (as listed in Appendix B)

TABLE 3: Likelihood of Occurrence and Possible Impacts – Fauna Species of Conservation Significance

FIGURES

FIGURE 1: Subject Site & Surrounds

FIGURE 2: Subject Site - Air Photo

FIGURE 3: Fauna Habitats

FIGURE 4: Habitat Trees (DBH >50cm)

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: Conservation Categories

APPENDIX B: Fauna Observed or Potentially in Subject Site

APPENDIX C: DPaW NatureMap & Protected Matters Search Tool Results

APPENDIX D: Habitat Tree Details

APPENDIX E: Significant Species Profiles

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Acronyms/Abbreviations:

ALA: Atlas of Living Australia – Website - www.ala.org.au/

BA: Birdlife Australia (Formerly RAOU, Birds Australia).

BC Bill: Biodiversity Conservation Bill (2015). WA Government.

BoM: Bureau of Meteorology, Australian Government.

°C: Degrees Celsius.

CALM: Department of Conservation and Land Management (now DPaW), WA Government.

CAMBA: China Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 1998.

CBD: Central Business District.

DAA: Department of Aboriginal Affairs, Western Australia.

DAFWA: Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia.

DBH: Diametre at breast height (~1.5m) of a tree.

DEC: Department of Environment and Conservation (now DPaW and DER), WA Government.

DEH: Department of Environment and Heritage (now DotE), Australian Government.

DEP: Department of Environment Protection (now DER), WA Government.

DER: Department of Environment Regulation (formerly DEC, DoE), WA Government.

DEWHA: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (now DotE), Australian Government

DMP: Department of Mines and Petroleum (formerly DoIR), WA Government.

DoE: Department of Environment (now DER/DPaW), WA Government.

DotE: Department of the Environment (formerly SEWPaC, DWEHA, DEH), Australian Government.

DoIR: Department of Industry and Resources (now DMP), WA Government.

DoW: Department of Water, Western Australia.

DPaW: Department of Parks and Wildlife (formerly DEC, CALM, DoE), WA Government.

EP Act: Environmental Protection Act 1986, WA Government.

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

EPA: Environmental Protection Authority, WA Government.

EPBC Act: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Australian Government.

GIS: Geographical Information System. ha: Hectare (10,000 square metres).

IBRA: Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia.

IUCN: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources – commonly known as the World Conservation Union.

JAMBA: Japan Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 1981. kms: Kilometres.

MRWA: Main Roads Western Australia, WA Government m: Metre. mm: Millimetre.

P: Priority - DPaW fauna conservation ranking.

POS: Public Open Space.

RAOU: Royal Australia Ornithologist Union.

ROKAMBA: Republic of Korea-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 2007.

S: Schedule - Western Australian Wildlife Conservation Act (1950) Threatened Fauna Category.

SEWPaC: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (now DotE, formerly DEH, DEWHA), Australian Government

SRE: Short Range Endemic.

SSC: Species Survival Commission, International.

WA: Western Australia.

WAM: Western Australian Museum, WA Government.

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

SUMMARY

This report details the results of a fauna assessment of a section of the South Western Highway (the Highway) referred to as “Padbury Hill Stage 2” (the subject site) (SLK 219.345 – 220.900) (Figures 1 to 4). It is understood that MRWA are proposing to widen various sections of the Highway within the subject site to improve the safety of the road.

Information obtained as part of this fauna assessment report will be used in conjunction with other environmental investigations to guide project planning and will also be used in the formulation of management plans, both of which will aim to minimise potential environmental impacts.

The scope of works was to conduct a level 1 fauna survey as defined by the EPA (EPA 2004). In accordance with these guidelines the assessment has therefore included a literature review and a field reconnaissance survey. Because some listed threatened species (e.g. several species of black cockatoo) are known to occur in the general area, the scope of the survey work was expanded to include targeted assessment of the site’s significance to these species.

Daytime field survey work at the site was carried out by Greg Harewood (Zoologist) on the 5 and 6 August 2016.

Descriptions of the broadly defined fauna habitats, based primarily on vegetation units and landforms identified during the field reconnaissance survey are provided in Table 1 below, with the extent of each identified unit being shown in Figures 3.

Overall the fauna habitats within the subject site are degraded or highly degraded. The majority of the areas bordering the existing road are either cleared, partly cleared (with scattered marri and jarrah), or contain plantation timber. Most of the subject site is bordered by plantations (pines or blue gums).

The majority (158, ~96.3%) of the trees were not observed to contain hollows of any size. Four (4, ~2.4%) of the trees contained one or more possible hollows considered by the Author not to be suitable for black cockatoos to use for nesting purposes.

Two trees (2, ~1.2%) were identified as potentially containing hollows that appeared possibly big enough to allow the entry of a black cockatoo into a suitably sized and orientated branch/trunk though no evidence of actual use by black cockatoos (e.g. significant chew marks around hollow entrance) was seen.

Additional details on each habitat tree observed can be found in Appendix D.

Natural foraging habitat within the subject site is mainly comprised of areas of vegetation mapped as containing marri and/or jarrah (~3.1 ha) though the density of both plant species does vary considerably from area to area and therefor the extent and quality is difficult to quantify. Pine plantations and some scattered pine trees in other areas make up ~1.4 ha of the subject site.

Page i MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Foraging debris left by black cockatoos observed within the subject site was relatively sparse. The most commonly recorded evidence was chewed marri fruits left by foraging forest red-tailed black cockatoos and Baudin’s black cockatoo. A small number of chewed pine cones were also seen at one location. Both Carnaby’s and Baudin’s black cockatoo forage on pine so either species could be responsible.

No existing roosting trees (trees used at night by black cockatoos to rest) were identified during the survey period.

There are vast areas (~17,250 ha) of similar habitat in state forest areas near (<10km) the subject site and it can be reasonably expected that these areas also contain vegetation that represents breeding, foraging and/or roosting habitat potentially suitable for black cockatoos.

Beside the foraging debris left by black cockatoos, no evidence of any other fauna species of conservation significance utilising the subject site was found during the site reconnaissance survey.

Opportunistic fauna observations are listed in Appendix B. A total of 16 native fauna species were observed (or positively identified from foraging evidence, scats, tracks, skeletons or calls) within or very near the subject site during the survey period. One introduced species (laughing kookaburra) was also recorded.

Most of the fauna species recorded were common, widespread bird species

The exact extent of clearing required for the proposed road works is yet to be defined. Based on similar road upgrades previously undertaken in the region, the extent of clearing is however unlikely to be more than a few hectares and will be comprised of small, narrow strips of roadside vegetation spread along various sections of the existing road alignment. Residual impacts are therefore unlikely to be significant.

Based on the anticipated small extent of clearing and the habitats present, likely impacts on species of conservation significance previously recorded in the general area has been assessed, a summary of which is provided in the table below. Additional information on specific fauna species is provided in Appendix E.

Page ii MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Likelihood of Occurrence and Possible Impacts – Fauna Species of Conservation Significance (continues on following page).

Conservation Possible Impacts/ Status Habitat Likelihood of Species Significance of Possible Present Occurrence Impacts WC Act/ EPBC Priority Act Black-stripe Minnow P3 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Galaxiella nigrostriata Darling Range Heath Ctenotus P4 - No Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Ctenotus delli

Malleefowl S3 VU No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Leipoa ocellata

Eastern Great Egret S5 Mig No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Ardea alba

Cattle Egret S5 Mig No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Ardea ibis

Blue-billed Duck P4 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Oxyura australis White-bellied Sea Eagle - Mig No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Haliaeetus leucogaster Osprey Mig, S5 No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Pandion haliaetus Ma

Potential for localised, Peregrine Falcon S7 - Yes Possible modification/loss of small areas Falco peregrinus of possible habitat/Negligible Australasian Bittern S1 EN No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Botaurus poiciloptilus Black Bittern Ixobrychus P1 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible flavicollis Little Bittern Ixobrychus P4 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible minutus Carnaby`s Black Potential for localised, Cockatoo S2 EN Yes Known to occur modification/loss of small areas Calyptorhynchus of possible habitat/Negligible latirostris

Baudin`s Black Potential for localised, Cockatoo S2 VU Yes Known to occur modification/loss of small areas Calyptorhynchus of possible habitat/Negligible baudinii

Forest Red-tailed Potential for localised, Black Cockatoo S3 VU Yes Known to occur modification/loss of small areas Calyptorhynchus of possible habitat/Negligible banksii naso Barking Owl (SW population) P2 - No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Ninox connivens connivens

Page iii MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Conservation Possible Impacts/ Status Habitat Likelihood of Species Significance of Possible Present Occurrence Impacts WC Act/ EPBC Priority Act Masked Owl (SW Potential for localised, population) P3 - Yes/Marginal Possible modification/loss of small areas Tyto n. of possible habitat/Negligible novaehollandiae Fork-tailed Swift S5 Mig Yes Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Apus pacificus Rainbow Bee- Potential for localised, eater S5 Mig Yes/Marginal Possible modification/loss of small areas Merops ornatus of possible habitat/Negligible

Grey Wagtail S5 Mig No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Motacilla cinerea Potential for localised, Chuditch S3 VU Yes/Marginal Possible modification/loss of small areas Dasyurus geoffroii of possible habitat/Negligible Numbat Myrmecobius S3 VU No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible fasciatus Southern Brush- Potential for localised, tailed Phascogale S3 - Yes/Marginal Possible modification/loss of small areas Phascogale of possible habitat/Negligible tapoatafa ssp Southern Brown Bandicoot P4 - No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Isoodon obesulus fusciventer Bilby S3 VU No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Macrotis lagotis Western Ringtail Possum S2 VU No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Pseudocheirus occidentalis Quokka Setonix S3 VU No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible brachyurus Western Brush Wallaby P4 - No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Macropus irma Western False Potential for localised, Pipistrelle P4 - Yes Possible modification/loss of small areas Falsistrellus of possible habitat/Negligible mackenziei Water Rat Hydromys P4 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible chrysogaster See Appendix A for conservation status codes

In summary, impacts on potential fauna species of conservation significance are anticipated to be negligible primarily due to the relatively small area of anticipated clearing required at any one point and the large expanses of nearby similar habitat (see Figure 1). While some small, localised residual loss of fauna habitat may occur for some species, regional impacts on the status or any one species are anticipated to be negligible/non-existent.

The assessment does however indicate that any considerations required during ongoing development planning are most likely to be related to the presence of habitat used or

Page iv MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

potentially used by some threatened fauna species, in particular the EPBC Act listed black cockatoo species.

Given the extent of vegetation likely to require clearing for the project in question is relatively small and spread over a 1.6 km linear corridor, the apparent absence of any existing breeding or roosting trees and the relatively large expanses of native vegetation in adjoining areas it is the Author’s opinion that if the proposed action were to be referred to the DotE it would not be classified as a “controlled action” and would therefore not need approval under the EPBC Act to proceed.

Other listed species, such as the chuditch (for example) are also unlikely to be significantly impacted upon by clearing with the subject site at any scale.

Despite this conclusion consideration should still be given to referring the project to the DotE to ensure compliance. This recommendation is primarily based on the presence of black cockatoo habitat within the subject site.

Page v MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

1. INTRODUCTION

This report details the results of a fauna assessment of a section of the South Western Highway (the Highway) referred to as “Padbury Hill Stage 2” (SLK 219.345 – 220.900) (the subject site). The subject site is located within a gazetted road reserve approximately 2 km south of Balingup and runs through areas of state forest primarily used for plantation timber (pines and blue gums) (Figure 1).

It is understood that MRWA are proposing to widen various sections of the Highway within the subject site to improve the safety of the road. Sections of the Highway are bordered by some remnant native vegetation and therefore the removal/modification of habitats in use by native fauna will be required. The exact location and extent of the clearing required is not known at this stage as planning is still progressing.

Information obtained as part of this fauna assessment report will be used in conjunction with other environmental investigations to guide project planning and will also be used in the formulation of management plans, both of which will aim to minimise potential environmental impacts. It is anticipated that the information presented will also be used by regulatory authorities to assess the potential impact of the proposal on fauna and fauna habitats at the site during the project evaluation and approval process.

Page 1 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

2. SCOPE OF WORKS

Main Roads have defined the scope of the fauna assessment as:

x Subject Site – SLK 219.345 to SLK 220.900 - either side of existing cleared areas, directly bordering the current South Western Highway alignment as defined by the provided ESRI shapefile (~11.3 ha);

x Level 1 Fauna Assessment (in accordance with EPA (2004) guidelines);

x GPS mapping and reporting of black cockatoo habitat trees i.e. with a DBH >50cm including tree species, identification of actual cockatoo nest trees and those with potential hollows for black cockatoos (including GPS co-ordinates and associated shapefile)

x Observation and recording of fauna species, including any signs of occurrence and/or usage;

x Undertake fauna habitat assessment and mapping;

x Assessment of presence and potential occurrence of specially protected fauna species;

x Discussion of habitat significance and linkages; and

x Preparation of a report detailing results including a discussion of habitat significance and linkages and potential requirement for federal referral or other clearances.

Note: For the purposes of this report the term black cockatoo is in reference to Baudin’s black cockatoo Calyptorhynchus baudinii, Carnaby’s black cockatoo Calyptorhynchus latirostris and the forest red-tailed black cockatoo Calyptorhynchus banksii naso.

Page 2 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

3. METHODS

3.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY - LITERATURE REVIEW

3.1.1 Database Searches

Searches of the following databases were undertaken to aid in the compilation of a list of conservation significant fauna potentially occurring within the subject site:

x DPaW’s NatureMap Database Search (combined data from DPaW, ALA, WAM, BA and consultants reports) (DPaW 2016); and

x Protected Matters Search Tool (DotE 2016).

It should be noted that lists produced during the abovementioned database searches contain observations/inferred distributions from a broader area than the subject site and therefore may include species that would only ever occur as vagrants due to a lack of suitable habitat or the presence of only marginal habitat within the subject site itself. The databases also often included or are based on very old records and in some cases the species in question have become locally or regionally extinct.

Information from these sources should therefore be taken as indicative only and local knowledge and information also needs to be taken into consideration when determining what actual species may be present within the specific area being investigated.

3.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area

Fauna surveys, assessments and reviews have been undertaken in nearby areas in the past, though not all are publically available and could not be referenced. The most significant of those available have been used as the primary reference material for compiling a list of fauna species of conservation significance most likely to occur in the general area.

Those reports referred to included, but were not limited to:

x Biologic (2011). Greenbushes Level 1 Fauna Survey. Unpublished report for Talison Lithium Australia Pty Ltd.

x Christensen, P., Annels, A., Liddelow, G. and Skinner, P. (1985). Vertebrate Fauna in The Southern Forests of Western Australia, A Survey. Forest Dept. of Western Australia, Bull. No. 94. Perth.

x ENV Australia (2009). Millstream Dam Level Two Fauna Assessment. Unpublished report for Water Corporation.

Page 3 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

x Harewood, G. (2006). Fauna Assessment (Level 1). Bridgetown Regional Water Supply – Pipeline Route. Unpublished report for Water Corporation.

x Harewood, G. (2007). Fauna Assessment (Level 1). Nannup Transfer Main. Unpublished report for Water Corporation.

x Harewood, G. (2010a). Targeted Fauna Habitat Assessment, South Western Highway Manjimup to Pemberton Turnoff, Manjimup. Unpublished report for MRWA.

x Harewood, G. (2010b). Fauna Survey (Level 1). Lot 3298 Brazier Street Donnybrook. Unpublished report for Cherry View Estate Pty Ltd.

x Harewood, G. (2010c). Black Cockatoo Habitat Assessment. South Western Highway (220.90 – 222.34 SLK). Unpublished report for MRWA.

x Harewood, G. (2011). Fauna Habitat Assessment. Vasse Highway (68 – 80 SLK). Unpublished report for MRWA.

x Harewood, G. (2015). Fauna Assessment, Wildcat Road Gravel Investigation Area, Shire of Manjimup. Unpublished report for MRWA.

As with the databases searches some reports refer to species that would not occur in the subject site due to a lack of suitable habitat (extent and/or quality) and this fact was taken into consideration when compiling the potential fauna species list. It should also be noted that the NatureMap database is likely to include some records from previous fauna surveys in the area including some of those listed above.

3.1.3 Existing Publications

The following represent the main publications used to identify and refine the potential fauna species list for the subject site:

x Anstis, M. (2013). Tadpoles and Frogs of Australia. New Holland Publishers, Sydney.

x Barrett, G., Silcocks, A., Barry, S., Cunningham, R. and Poulter, R. (2003). The New Atlas of Australian Birds. Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union, Victoria.

x Bush, B., Maryan, B., Browne-Cooper, R. & Robinson, D. (2007). Reptiles and Frogs in the Bush: Southwestern Australia. UWA Press, Nedlands.

x Churchill, S. (2008). Australian Bats. Second Edition, Allen & Unwin.

x Cogger, H.G. (2014). Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia. 7th Edition. CSIRO Publishing.

Page 4 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

x Johnstone, R.E. and Storr, G.M. (1998). Handbook of Western Australian Birds: Volume 1 – Non-passerines (Emu to Dollarbird). Western Australian Museum, Perth Western Australia.

x Johnstone, R.E. and Storr, G.M. (2004). Handbook of Western Australian Birds: Volume 2 – Passerines (Blue-winged Pitta to Goldfinch). Western Australian Museum, Perth Western Australia.

x Menkhorst, P. and Knight, F. (2011). A Field Guide to the Mammals of Australia. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

x Morgan, D.L., Beatty, S.J., Klunzinger, M.W, Allen, M.G. and Burnham, Q.E (2011). Field Guide to the Freshwater Fishes, Crayfishes and Mussels of South Western Australia. Published by SERCUL.

x Storr, G.M., Smith, L.A. and Johnstone R.E. (1983). Lizards of Western Australia II: Dragons and Monitors. WA Museum, Perth.

x Storr, G.M., Smith, L.A. and Johnstone R.E. (1990). Lizards of Western Australia III: Geckos and Pygopods. WA Museum, Perth.

x Storr, G.M., Smith, L.A. and Johnstone R.E. (1999). Lizards of Western Australia I: Skinks. Revised Edition, WA Museum, Perth.

x Storr, G.M., Smith, L.A. and Johnstone R.E. (2002). Snakes of Western Australia. Revised Edition, WA Museum, Perth.

x Tyler M.J. & Doughty P. (2009). Field Guide to Frogs of Western Australia, Fourth Edition, WA Museum, Perth.

x Van Dyck, S., Gynther, I. & Baker, A. Eds (2013). Field Companion to The Mammals of Australia. Queensland Museum.

x Wilson, S. and Swan, G. (2013). A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia. Reed, New Holland, Sydney.

3.1.4 Fauna of Conservation Significance

The conservation significance of fauna species has been assessed using data from the following sources:

x Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). Administered by the Australian Government Department of the Environment (DotE);

Page 5 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

x Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (WC Act). Administered by the Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) (Govt. of WA 2015);

x Red List produced by the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (also known as the IUCN Red List - the acronym derived from its former name of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). The Red List has no legislative power in Australia but is used as a framework for State and Commonwealth categories and criteria; and the

x DPaW Priority Fauna list. A non-statutory list maintained by the DPaW for management purposes (DPaW 2015).

The EPBC Act also requires the compilation of a list of migratory species that are recognised under international treaties including the:

x Japan Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 1981 (JAMBA);

x China Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 1998 (CAMBA);

x Republic of Korea-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement 2007 (ROKAMBA); and

x Bonn Convention 1979 (The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild ).

(Note - Species listed under JAMBA are also protected under Schedule 5 of the WC Act.)

All migratory bird species listed in the annexes to these bilateral agreements are protected in Australia as matters of national environmental significance (NES) under the EPBC Act.

The conservation status of all vertebrate fauna species listed as occurring or possibly occurring in the vicinity of the subject site has been assessed using the most recent lists published in accordance with the above mentioned instruments and is indicated as such in the fauna listings of this report. A full listing of conservation codes is provided in Appendix A.

3.1.5 Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Taxonomy and nomenclature for vertebrate fauna species used in this report is generally taken from the DPaW’s WA Fauna Census Database which is assumed to follow Aplin and Smith (2001) for amphibians and reptiles and Johnstone (2001) for birds. Jackson and Groves (2015) has been used for mammals.

Common names are taken from the Western Australia Museum (WAM) recognised primary common name listings when specified, though where common names are not

Page 6 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

provided they have been acquired from other publications. Sources include Cogger (2014), Wilson and Swan (2013), Van Dyck & Strahan (2013), Christidis and Boles (2008), Bush et al. (2010), Bush et al. (2007), Tyler & Doughty (2009), and Glauret (1961). Not all common names are generally accepted.

3.1.6 Likelihood of Occurrence – Fauna of Conservation Significance

Fauna of conservation significance identified during the literature review as previously being recorded in the general area were assessed and ranked for their likelihood of occurrence within the subject site itself. The rankings and criteria used were:

x Would Not Occur: There is no suitable habitat for the species in the subject site and/or there is no documented record of the species in the general area since records have been kept and/or the species is generally accepted as being locally/regionally extinct (supported by a lack of recent records).

o Locally Extinct: Populations no longer occur within a small part of the species natural range, in this case within 10 or 20km of the subject site. Populations do however persist outside of this area.

o Regionally Extinct: Populations no longer occur in a large part of the species natural range, in this case within the southern forest regions. Populations do however persist outside of this area.

x Unlikely to Occur: The subject site is outside of the currently documented distribution for the species in question, or no suitable habitat (type, quality and extent) was identified as being present during the field assessment. Individuals of some species may occur occasionally as vagrants/transients especially if suitable habitat is located nearby but the subject site itself would not support a population or part population of the species.

x Possibly Occurs: The subject site is within the known distribution of the species in question and habitat of at least marginal quality was identified as being present during the field assessment, supported in some cases by recent records being documented in literature from within or near the subject site. In some cases, while a species may be classified as possibly being present at times, habitat may be marginal (e.g. poor quality, fragmented, limited in extent) and therefore the frequency of occurrence and/or population levels may be low.

x Known to Occur: The species in question was positively identified as being present (for sedentary species) or as using the subject site as habitat for some other purpose (for non-sedentary/mobile species) during the field survey. This information may have been obtained by direct observation of individuals or by way of secondary evidence (e.g. foraging debris, tracks and scats). In some cases, while a species may be classified as known to occur, habitat may be

Page 7 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

marginal (e.g. poor quality, fragmented, limited in extent) and therefore the frequency of occurrence and/or population levels may be low.

3.2 SITE SURVEYS

Daytime field survey work at the site was carried out by Greg Harewood (B.Sc. - Zoology) on the 5 and 6 August 2016.

3.2.1 Fauna Habitat Assessment

The vegetation communities, landforms and soils identified during the daytime reconnaissance surveys of the subject site have been used as the basis for the classification of areas into broad fauna habitat types.

As part of the literature review, available information on the habitat requirements of the species of conservation significance listed as possibly occurring in the area was researched. During the daytime reconnaissance survey the habitats within the subject site were assessed and specific elements identified, if present, to determine the likelihood of listed species of conservation significance occurring and its likely overall value to them on a local and regional scale.

3.2.2 Black Cockatoo Habitat Assessment

The following methods were employed during the black cockatoo habitat assessment to comply with the defined scope of works and are based on guidelines published by the DotE (SEWPaC 2012) which states that surveys for Carnaby’s, Baudin’s and forest red- tailed black cockatoo habitat should:

x be done by a suitably qualified person with experience in vegetation or cockatoo surveys, depending on the type of survey being undertaken;

x maximise the chance of detecting the species’ habitat and/or signs of use;

x determine the context of the site within the broader landscape—for example, the amount and quality of habitat nearby and in the local region (for example, within 10 km);

x account for uncertainty and error (false presence and absences); and

x include collation of existing data on known locations of breeding and feeding birds and night roost locations.

Page 8 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Habitat used by black cockatoos have been placed into three categories by the DotE (SEWPaC 2012) these being:

x Breeding Habitat;

x Foraging Habitat; and

x Night Roosting Habitat.

So as to comply with the requested scope of works and in line with the published guidelines the following was carried out.

3.2.2.1 Black Cockatoo Breeding Habitat

The black cockatoo breeding habitat assessment involved the identification of all suitable breeding trees species (native, endemic species only) within the subject site that had a DBH of equal to or over 50cm. The DBH of each tree was estimated using a pre-made 50 cm “caliper”.

Target tree species included marri and jarrah or any other Corymbia/Eucalyptus species of a suitable size that may have been present. Peppermints, banksia, sheoak and melaleuca tree species (for example) were not assessed as they typically do not develop hollows that are used by black cockatoos.

The location of each tree identified as being over the threshold DBH was recorded with a GPS and details on tree species, number and size of hollows (if any) noted. Trees observed to contain hollows (of any size/type) were marked with “H” using spray paint for easy future reference.

Based on this assessment trees present within the subject site have been place into one of four categories:

x Tree < 50cm DBH or an unsuitable species (not recorded);

x Tree >50cm DBH, no hollows seen;

x Tree >50cm DBH, one or more hollows seen, none of which were considered suitable for black cockatoos to use for nesting; or

x Tree >50cm DBH, one or more hollows seen, with at least one considered suitable for black cockatoos to use for nesting.

Page 9 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

For the purposes of this assessment a tree containing a potential cockatoo nest hollow was defined as:

Generally, any tree which is alive or dead that contains one or more visible hollows (cavities within the trunk or branches) suitable for occupation by a black cockatoo for the purpose of nesting/breeding. Hollows that had an entrance greater than about 10cm in diameter and would allow the entry of a black cockatoo into a suitably orientated and sized branch/trunk were recorded as a “potential black cockatoo nest hollow”.

Identified hollows were examined using binoculars for evidence of actual use by black cockatoos (e.g. chewing around hollow entrance, scarring and scratch marks on trunks and branches). Trees with possible nest hollows were also scratched and raked with a large stick/pole in attempt to flush any sitting birds from hollows and calls of chicks were also listened for. It should be noted that the survey may have been conducted outside of the main breeding season of one or more of the three species of black cockatoo.

3.2.2.2 Black Cockatoo Foraging Habitat

The location and nature of black cockatoo foraging evidence (e.g. chewed fruits around base of trees) observed during the reconnaissance survey was recorded. The nature and extent of potential foraging habitat present was also documented irrespective of the presence of any actual foraging evidence.

3.2.2.3 Black Cockatoo Roosting Habitat

Direct and indirect evidence of black cockatoos roosting within trees was with the subject site was noted if observed (e.g. branch clippings, droppings or moulted feathers).

3.2.3 Other Fauna Species of Conservation Significance

Evidence of the presence or likely presence of other fauna species of conservation significance (or suitable habitat) was searched for and recorded concurrent with the black cockatoo habitat assessment. The aim was to obtain sufficient information to make a definitive comment on the likely significance of the subject site to other fauna species of conservation significance.

Methods involved traversing a series of transects across the subject site while searching microhabitats such as logs, rocks, leaf litter and observations with binoculars. Secondary evidence of a species presence such as tracks, scats, skeletal remains, foraging evidence or calls were also noted if observed/heard.

3.2.4 Opportunistic Fauna Observations

Opportunistic observations of fauna species were made during all field survey work and recorded where positive species identifications were made.

Page 10 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

4. SURVEY CONSTRAINTS

No seasonal sampling has been carried out as part of this fauna assessment. The conclusions presented are based upon field data and the environmental monitoring and/or testing carried out over a limited period of time and are therefore merely indicative of the environmental condition of the site at the time of the field assessments. It should also be recognised that site conditions can change with time.

Some fauna species are reported as potentially occurring based on there being suitable habitat (quality and extent) within the subject site or immediately adjacent. With respect to opportunistic observations, the possibility exists that certain species may not have been detected during field investigations due to:

x seasonal inactivity during the field survey;

x species present within micro habitats not surveyed;

x cryptic species able to avoid detection; and

x transient wide-ranging species not present during the survey period.

Lack of observational data on some species should therefore not necessarily be taken as an indication that a species is absent from the site or does not utilise it for some purpose at times.

The habitat requirements and ecology of many of the species known to occur in the wider area are often not well understood or documented. It can therefore be difficult to exclude species from the potential list based on an apparent lack of a specific habitat or microhabitat within the subject site. As a consequence of this limitation the potential fauna list produced is most likely an overestimation of those species that actually utilise the subject site for some purpose. Some species may be present in the general area but may only use the subject site itself on rare occasions or as vagrants/transients.

In recognition of survey limitations, a precautionary approach has been adopted for this assessment. Any fauna species that would possibly occur within the subject site (or immediately adjacent), as identified through ecological databases, publications, discussions with local experts/residents and the habitat knowledge of the Author, has been assumed to potentially occur in the subject site.

During the black cockatoo habitat survey trees with hollows were searched for. It should be noted that identifying hollows suitable for fauna species from ground level has limitations. Generally the full characteristics of any hollow seen are not fully evident (e.g. internal dimensions). It is also difficult to locate all hollows within all trees as some are not observable from ground level.

Page 11 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

The location of observations was recorded using a handheld GPS. The accuracy of the GPS cannot be guaranteed above a level of about three to five metres, though it should be noted that in some circumstance the accuracy can increase or decrease beyond this range.

Page 12 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

5. RESULTS

5.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY – LITERATURE REVIEW

A list of fauna species considered most likely to occur in the subject site has been compiled from information obtained during the literature review and is presented in Appendix B. This listing was refined after information gathered during the site reconnaissance survey was assessed. The results of some previous fauna surveys carried out in the general area are summarised in this species listing as are the DPaW NatureMap database search results. The raw database search results from NatureMap (DPaW 2016) and the Protected Matters Search Tool (DotE 2016) are contained within Appendix C.

The list of potential fauna takes into consideration that the subject site is within the current documented range of the species, the species in question is not known to be locally extinct and that suitable habitat for each species, as identified during the habitat assessment, is present. Compiling an accurate list does however have limitations (see Section 4 above) and therefore as discussed, the listing is very likely to be an overestimation of the fauna species actually present within the subject site at any one time.

5.2 SITE SURVEYS

5.2.1 Fauna Habitat Assessment

Descriptions of the broadly defined fauna habitats, based primarily on vegetation units and landforms identified during the field reconnaissance survey are provided in Table 1 below, with the extent of each identified unit being shown in Figure3.

Table 1: Main Fauna Habitats within the Subject site

Unit Fauna Habitat Description Example Image

Marri and Jarrah Open Forest

Marri and jarrah dominated forest 1 over low shrubland.

Total Area= ~1.0 ha

Page 13 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Unit Fauna Habitat Description Example Image

Marri and Jarrah Open Woodland

Marri and jarrah dominated open 2 woodland over open low shrubland/bare ground.

Total Area= ~2.1 ha

Pine Plantations/Planted Eucalypts 3

Total Area= ~1.4 ha

Existing Cleared Areas (including the existing road 4 alignment)

Total Area= ~6.8 ha

Overall the fauna habitats within the subject site are degraded or highly degraded. The majority of the areas bordering the existing road are either cleared, partly cleared (with scattered marri and jarrah), or contain plantation timber. Most of the subject site is bordered by plantations (pines or blue gums).

The vegetation within the subject site does not represent a significant “linkage” or “corridor” for wildlife movement in the area as it is mostly degraded, fragmented and provides no access from one native forest area to another. Any proposed clearing will not compromise any existing values the site may have in this regard.

Page 14 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

The best quality native remnant is located in the southern end of the subject site on the east side of the Highway, though this area is limited in extent (~1.0 ha) and appears to be regrowth from historical logging activities, with most trees being relatively small. This vegetation is continuous with a larger area of remnant of native vegetation that lies to the east of the subject site (Greenbushes State Forest). All of the identified natural fauna habitats within the subject site would be well represented in this state forest area. It is therefore unlikely that any vegetation within the subject would represent unique or better quality habitat compared to surrounding areas.

Based on available vegetation mapping it is estimated that there is approximately 17,250 ha of native vegetation within 10 km the survey area (see Figure 1). Remnant native vegetation present within the subject site (total ~3.1 ha) makes up ~0.018% of this total.

5.2.1.1 Black Cockatoo Habitat Tree Assessment

Trees considered potentially suitable for black cockatoos to use as nesting habitat (subject to a suitable hollow being present and other factors) which were found within the subject site are comprised of the following species:

x Marri – Corymbia calophylla;

x Jarrah - Eucalyptus marginata; and

x Dead unidentifiable species.

A summary of the potential black cockatoo breeding trees (using DotE criteria i.e. any suitable tree species with a DBH > 50cm (SEWPaC 2012)) observed within the subject site is provided in Table 2 below and their location shown in Figures 12 to 16.

Table 2: Summary of potential cockatoo breeding habitat trees (DBH >50cm)

Tree Species Number of Number of

Trees with Trees with Dead Unknown

Number of No- Total Hollows Hollows Trees with Eucalypt Jarrah Endemic Number Considered Considered Marri No of Habitat Unsuitable Possibly Hollows Trees for Nesting Suitable for Observed Black Nesting Black Cockatoos Cockatoos

164 158 4 2 89 58 16 1

The assessment identified a total of 164 trees with a DBH of >50cms within the subject site. The majority (158, ~96.3%) of the trees were not observed to contain hollows of

Page 15 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

any size. Four (4, ~2.4%) of the trees contained one or more possible hollows considered by the Author not to be suitable for black cockatoos to use for nesting purposes. Two trees (2, ~1.2%) were identified as potentially containing hollows that appeared possibly big enough to allow the entry of a black cockatoo into a suitably sized and orientated branch/trunk though no evidence of actual use by black cockatoos (e.g. significant chew marks around hollow entrance) was seen.

Additional details on each habitat tree observed can be found in Appendix D.

A review of available data revealed no documented breeding records from the vicinity of the subject site (i.e. within 10km). The subject site does however fall within the mapped breeding range of Carnaby’s black cockatoo as depicted in the most current recovery plan produced by DPaW (Figure 2 - DEC 2012).

The corresponding DPaW recovery plan for Baudin’s and the forest red-tailed black cockatoo (DEC 2007) does not specifically define any known breeding areas for either species. Johnstone and Kirkby (2011) also do not specifically mention breeding areas of either species within the area though both are noted as utilising marri trees (and other tree species) for breeding in the south west.

While no breeding data appears to exist for the general area this could simply be a consequence of a lack of survey work or a lack of publicly available data. Based on available vegetation mapping it is however estimated that there is approximately 17,250 ha of native vegetation within 10 km the survey area (see Figure 1). Given this fact, there is significant potential for breeding to take place in the wider area (assuming the presence of suitable trees).

The results therefore suggest that the removal of some or all of the identified “habitat trees” from within the subject site (none of which showed any evidence of use by black cockatoo for nesting) is unlikely to have significant direct or indirect impact on breeding black cockatoos and is also unlikely to significantly impact on the total “breeding habitat” resource available in the wider area.

5.2.1.2 Black Cockatoo Foraging Habitat Assessment

Following is a list of the main flora species recorded within the subject site during the fauna assessment that are known to be used as a direct food source (i.e. seeds or flowers) by one or more species of black cockatoo:

x Marri - Corymbia calophylla;

x Jarrah - Eucalyptus marginata;

x Bull Banksia – Banksia grandis (a few specimens only);

x Balga – Xanthorrhoea preissii; and

Page 16 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

x Pine – Pinus sp.

It should be noted that some of the above-mentioned species (e.g. balga) while foraged upon on occasions are only likely to make up a small proportion of any one birds diet relative to more favoured plant species such as marri.

Natural foraging habitat within the subject site is mainly comprised of areas of vegetation mapped as containing marri and/or jarrah (~3.1 ha) though the density of both plant species does vary considerably from area to area and therefor the extent and quality is difficult to quantify. Pine plantations and some scattered pine trees in other areas make up ~1.4 ha of the subject site.

Foraging debris left by black cockatoos observed within the subject site was relatively sparse. The most commonly recorded evidence was chewed marri fruits left by foraging forest red-tailed black cockatoos and Baudin’s black cockatoo. A small number of chewed pine cones were also seen at one location. Both Carnaby’s and Baudin’s black cockatoo forage on pine so either species could be responsible.

Based on available vegetation mapping it is estimated that there is approximately 17,250 ha of native vegetation within 10 km the survey area (~49% of total area - see Figure 1), much of which is very likely to represent potential black cockatoo foraging habitat of some type. There are also at least 2,900 ha of pine plantations within 10km of the site. Pines are likely to be a significant foraging resource for Carnaby’s black cockatoos (and possibly Baudin’s black cockatoo) in this area.

It is difficult to calculate the actual extent of natural foraging habitat within the subject site given it is largely comprised of patchy fragmented vegetation, but it is unlikely to total more than about 4.5 ha (including pines). This area represents less than 0.022% of the potential foraging habitat within 10km of the subject site. Overall the results therefore suggest that the potential removal of some or all of this vegetation from the subject site is unlikely to have a significant impact on the availability of foraging resources for black cockatoos in the general area.

5.2.1.3 Black Cockatoo Roosting Habitat Assessment

No evidence of black cockatoo roosting within trees located within the subject site was observed during the field reconnaissance survey.

A review of available data did not reveal any documented roosts sites within 10km of the survey area, though as with breeding habitat this could simply be a consequence of a lack of survey work or a lack of publicly available data. Given the relatively large extent of native remnant vegetation still present with 10km of the survey area (~17,250 ha) there is likely to be numerous roosting opportunities present in the general vicinity.

Page 17 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

The results suggest that the removal of the relatively small number of trees from the survey area will not have any direct impact on roosting black cockatoos and also will not significantly impact on roosting opportunities available in the area.

5.2.2 Other Fauna Species of Conservation Significance

Beside the foraging debris left by black cockatoos, no evidence of any other fauna species of conservation significance utilising the subject site was found during the site reconnaissance survey.

The habitat assessment and other observations made during the field reconnaissance survey does however suggest that some fauna species of conservation significance are likely to persist in the general area. Subject to suitable habitat being present (i.e. quality and extent) it is considered possible that some are also likely to reside or at least frequent the subject site at times.

The extent of habitats within the subject site is however extremely small and therefore any fauna species actually present are only likely to be represented by a small number of individuals at any one time. A summary of those species considered likely to be present is provided in Table 4, within Section 7. Additional information on this assessment of likelihood of occurrence being provided in Appendix E.

5.2.3 Opportunistic Fauna Observations

Opportunistic fauna observations are listed in Appendix B. A total of 16 native fauna species were observed (or positively identified from foraging evidence, scats, tracks, skeletons or calls) within or very near the subject site during the survey period. One introduced species (laughing kookaburra) was also recorded.

Most of the fauna species recorded were common, widespread bird species.

5.3 FAUNA INVENTORY – SUMMARY

Table 3 summarises the number of fauna species potentially occurring within or utilising at times the subject site, based on results from the literature review and observations made during the field assessment. A complete list of fauna possibly inhabiting or frequenting the subject site is located in Appendix B.

As previously indicated, not all species listed as potentially occurring within the subject site in existing databases and publications (i.e. EPBC Act Threatened Fauna and Migratory species lists, DPaW’s NatureMap database, various reports and publications) are shown in the expected listing in Appendix B. Some species have been excluded from this list based largely on the lack of suitable habitat at the subject site and in the general area or known local extinction even if suitable habitat is present.

Page 18 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Table 3: Summary of Potential Fauna Species (as listed in Appendix B)

Number of Potential Total Potential Potential species number of number of number of number observed: Group specially potential migratory of priority Field protected species species species Survey species 2016

Amphibians 3 0 0 0 0

Reptiles 14 0 0 0 0

Birds 791 4 1 1 161

Non-Volant 146 2 0 0 1 Mammals Volant Mammals 10 0 0 1 0 (Bats)

Total 1207 6 1 2 171

Superscript = number of introduced species included in total.

Despite the omission of some species it should be noted that the list provided is still very likely an over estimation of the fauna species utilising the site (either on a regular or infrequent basis) as a result of the precautionary approach adopted for the assessment. At any one time only a subset of the listed potential species are likely to be present within the bounds of the subject site.

A number of other species of conservation significance, while possibly present in the general area, are not listed as potential species due to known localised extinction (and no subsequent recruitment from adjoining areas) and/or lack of suitable habitat.

Page 19 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

6. LIKELIHOOD OF OCCURRENCE AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS

Fauna of conservation significance identified during the literature review as previously being recorded in the general area are listed in Table 4. Each has been assessed and ranked for their likelihood of occurrence within the subject site itself based on information obtained during the fauna assessment.

In general, the most significant potential impacts to fauna of any development include:

x Loss of vegetation/fauna habitat that may be used for foraging, breeding, roosting, or dispersal (includes loss of hollow bearing trees);

x Fragmentation of vegetation/fauna habitat which may restrict the movement of some fauna species;

x Modifications to surface hydrology, siltation of creek lines;

x Changes to fire regimes;

x Pollution (e.g. oil spills);

x Noise/Light/Dust;

x Spread of plant pathogens (e.g. dieback) and weeds;

x Potential increase in the number of predatory introduced species (e.g. cats);

x Death or injury of fauna during clearing and construction; and

x An increase in fauna road kills subsequent to development.

In this instance the potential impacts on fauna will relate primarily to the loss of habitat due to clearing. The exact extent of clearing required for the proposed road works is yet to be defined. Based on similar road upgrades previously undertaken in the region, the extent of clearing is however unlikely to be more than a few hectares and will be comprised of small, narrow strips of roadside vegetation spread along various sections of the existing road alignment. Residual impacts are therefore unlikely to be significant.

Based on the anticipated small extent of clearing and the habitats present, likely impacts on species of conservation significance previously recorded in the general area has been assessed, a summary of which is provided in Table 4 below. Additional information on specific fauna species is provided in Appendix E.

Page 20 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Table 4: Likelihood of Occurrence and Possible Impacts – Fauna Species of Conservation Significance (continues on following pages).

Conservation Possible Impacts/ Status Habitat Likelihood of Species Significance of Possible Present Occurrence Impacts WC Act/ EPBC Priority Act Black-stripe Minnow P3 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Galaxiella nigrostriata Darling Range Heath Ctenotus P4 - No Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Ctenotus delli

Malleefowl S3 VU No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Leipoa ocellata

Eastern Great Egret S5 Mig No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Ardea alba

Cattle Egret S5 Mig No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Ardea ibis

Blue-billed Duck P4 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Oxyura australis White-bellied Sea Eagle - Mig No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Haliaeetus leucogaster Osprey Mig, S5 No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Pandion haliaetus Ma

Potential for localised, Peregrine Falcon S7 - Yes Possible modification/loss of small areas Falco peregrinus of possible habitat/Negligible Australasian Bittern S1 EN No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Botaurus poiciloptilus Black Bittern Ixobrychus P1 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible flavicollis Little Bittern Ixobrychus P4 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible minutus Carnaby`s Black Potential for localised, Cockatoo S2 EN Yes Known to occur modification/loss of small areas Calyptorhynchus of possible habitat/Negligible latirostris

Baudin`s Black Potential for localised, Cockatoo S2 VU Yes Known to occur modification/loss of small areas Calyptorhynchus of possible habitat/Negligible baudinii

Forest Red-tailed Potential for localised, Black Cockatoo S3 VU Yes Known to occur modification/loss of small areas Calyptorhynchus of possible habitat/Negligible banksii naso

Page 21 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Conservation Possible Impacts/ Status Habitat Likelihood of Species Significance of Possible Present Occurrence Impacts WC Act/ EPBC Priority Act Barking Owl (SW population) P2 - No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Ninox connivens connivens Masked Owl (SW Potential for localised, population) P3 - Yes/Marginal Possible modification/loss of small areas Tyto n. of possible habitat/Negligible novaehollandiae Fork-tailed Swift S5 Mig Yes Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Apus pacificus Rainbow Bee- Potential for localised, eater S5 Mig Yes/Marginal Possible modification/loss of small areas Merops ornatus of possible habitat/Negligible

Grey Wagtail S5 Mig No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Motacilla cinerea Potential for localised, Chuditch S3 VU Yes/Marginal Possible modification/loss of small areas Dasyurus geoffroii of possible habitat/Negligible Numbat Myrmecobius S3 VU No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible fasciatus Southern Brush- Potential for localised, tailed Phascogale S3 - Yes/Marginal Possible modification/loss of small areas Phascogale of possible habitat/Negligible tapoatafa ssp Southern Brown Bandicoot P4 - No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Isoodon obesulus fusciventer Bilby S3 VU No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible Macrotis lagotis Western Ringtail Possum S2 VU No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Pseudocheirus occidentalis Quokka Setonix S3 VU No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible brachyurus Western Brush Wallaby P4 - No/Marginal Unlikely None Identified/Negligible Macropus irma Western False Potential for localised, Pipistrelle P4 - Yes Possible modification/loss of small areas Falsistrellus of possible habitat/Negligible mackenziei Water Rat Hydromys P4 - No Would Not Occur None Identified/Negligible chrysogaster See Appendix A for conservation status codes

In summary, impacts on potential fauna species of conservation significance are anticipated to be negligible primarily due to the relatively small area of anticipated clearing required at any one point and the large expanses of adjoining similar habitat (see Figure 1). While some small, localised residual loss of fauna habitat may occur for

Page 22 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

some species, regional impacts on the status or any one species are anticipated to be negligible/non-existent.

Page 23 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

7. LEGISLATIVE OBLIGATIONS

7.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1986

The purpose of the Environmental Protection Act (1986) is “...to provide for an Environmental Protection Authority, for the prevention, control and abatement of pollution and environmental harm, for the conservation, preservation, protection enhancement and management of the environment and for matters incidental to or connected with the foregoing”.

The powers of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 are administered by the Department of Environment Regulation (DER), which in relevant cases advises to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA).

Legislation proclaimed on 8 July 2004 protects all native vegetation in Western Australia. Under the law, clearing native vegetation is prohibited, unless a clearing permit is granted by the DER, or the clearing is for an exempt purpose. These exemptions ensure that low impact day to day activities involving clearing can be undertaken. People that wish to clear are required to submit an application if an exemption does not apply.

Clearing applications are assessed against ten defined clearing principles related to native vegetation in the EP Act. These principles provide a guide for when native vegetation should not be cleared. The DER must consider these principles in making a decision on whether or not to issue a clearing permit. The DER has set out the minimum requirements and standards for addressing each of the ten principles in detail in its assessment methodology.

Any proposed clearing should not be in variance to any of the 10 clearing principles, these being:

Native vegetation should not be cleared if

(a) it comprises a high level of biological diversity;

(b) it comprises the whole or a part of, or is necessary for the maintenance of, a significant habitat for fauna indigenous to Western Australia;

(c) it includes, or is necessary for the continued existence of, rare flora;

(d) it comprises the whole or a part of, or is necessary for the maintenance of a threatened ecological community;

(e) it is significant as a remnant of native vegetation in an area that has been extensively cleared;

Page 24 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

(f) it is growing in, or in association with, an environment associated with a watercourse or wetland;

(g) the clearing of the vegetation is likely to cause appreciable land degradation;

(h) the clearing of the vegetation is likely to have an impact on the environmental values of any adjacent or nearby conservation area;

(i) the clearing of the vegetation is likely to cause deterioration in the quality of surface or underground water; or

(j) clearing the vegetation is likely to cause, or exacerbate, the incidence of flooding.

One purpose of the assessment reported on here is to provide information relevant to principle (a) & (b). Based on the assessment results and despite the fact that the area is or is possibly being utilised by some species of conservation significance it is the Author’s opinion that the site doesn’t have what would be considered a high level of biological diversity or constitute the whole or a part of, or is necessary for the maintenance of, a significant habitat for fauna indigenous to Western Australia.

This opinion is based on the fact that fauna habitats present within the subject site are common and widespread in the general area, the extent of clearing is likely to be very small and the faunal assemblage identified as potentially present is unlikely to be different to that found in similar habitats located elsewhere in the region. It can therefore be concluded that the subject site does not contain habitats of high ecological significance from a faunal perspective or contain faunal assemblages that are ecologically significant. The vegetation types proposed to be cleared are well represented within the local (10 km radius) area and therefore it is unlikely the any areas to be cleared will be considered to be locally or regionally significant remnants.

The DER will however consider all available information relating to all 10 clearing principles, not just those relating to fauna. The possible use of the subject site by several species of conservation significance will influence the DER decision making process, though it is difficult to predict specific outcomes as some discretion is exercised by the DER when assessing the appropriateness of any clearing activities. Any proposed rehabilitation, offsets, mitigation measures and management plans are also taken into consideration.

7.2 ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999

A number of fauna species known to or potentially present within the subject site are listed under the federal EPBC Act. The objective of the EPBC Act is to provide for the protection of the environment, especially those aspects that are of national significance,

Page 25 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

promote ecologically sustainable development, the conservation of biodiversity and a cooperative approach to the protection and management of the environment.

If an action (i.e. clearing for road works) is deemed to have a potential “significant impact” on any listed species (or their habitat), a referral to the DotE is required to ensure compliance with the EPBC Act. Actions that are assessed as likely to have a “significant impact” are deemed “controlled actions” and are typically subject to conditions imposed to minimise or offset impacts.

The potential significance of each action is judged on a case-by-case basis by the DotE and while the guidelines provide information to assist in deciding whether to refer a proposed “action”, the possible impacts will depend on the particular circumstances of the action including (but not limited to) the overall suitability of the habitat, its connectivity, and the amount of habitat remaining in the region.

Given the extent of vegetation likely to require clearing for the project in question is relatively small and spread over a 1.6 km linear corridor, the apparent absence of any existing breeding or roosting trees and the relatively large expanses of native vegetation in adjoining areas it is the Author’s opinion that if the proposed action were to be referred to the DotE it would not be classified as a “controlled action” and would therefore not need approval under the EPBC Act to proceed.

Other listed species, such as the chuditch (for example) are also unlikely to be significantly impacted upon by clearing with the subject site at any scale.

Page 26 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

8. CONCLUSION

The fauna assessment within the subject site was undertaken for the purposes of delineating and characterising the fauna habitats and faunal assemblages present and to identify potential impacts of the proposed works. A targeted black cockatoo assessment was also carried out.

Overall, many of the conservation significant species known from the region are unlikely to be impacted on by the proposal due to the fact that the subject site does not contain their preferred habitat and therefore they are unlikely to be present. In cases where some habitat is present likely impacts are anticipated to be low primarily due to the relatively small area of clearing anticipated and the large expanses of similar, adjoining habitat (see Figure 1). While some small, localised residual loss of fauna habitat may occur for some species, regional impacts on the status or any one species have been assessed as being negligible/non-existent.

The assessment does however indicate that any considerations required during ongoing development planning are most likely to be related to the presence of habitat used or potentially used by some threatened fauna species, in particular the EPBC Act listed black cockatoo species.

While it is the Author’s opinion that if the proposed action were to be referred to the DotE it would not be classified as a “controlled action” and would therefore not need approval under the EPBC Act to proceed it is still recommended that consideration should be given to referring the project to the DotE to ensure compliance. This recommendation is primarily based on the presence of black cockatoo habitat within the subject site.

Page 27 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

9. REFERENCES

Allen, G.R., Midgley, S.H., Allen, M. (2003). Freshwater Fishes of Australia. Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia.

Anstis, M. (2013). Tadpoles and Frogs of Australia. New Holland Publishers, Sydney.

Aplin, K.P. and Smith, L.A. (2001). Checklist of the frogs and reptiles of Western Australia, Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 63, 51-74.

Barrett, G., Silcocks, A., Barry, S., Cunningham, R. and Poulter, R. (2003). The New Atlas of Australian Birds. Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union, Victoria.

Biologic (2011). Greenbushes Level 1 Fauna Survey. Unpublished report for Talison Lithium Australia Pty Ltd.

Bush, B., Maryan, B., Browne-Cooper, R. & Robinson, D. (2007). Reptiles and Frogs in the Bush: Southwestern Australia. UWA Press, Nedlands.

Bush, B., Maryan, B., Browne-Cooper, R. & Robinson, D. (2010). Reptiles and Frogs of the Perth Region. UWA Press, Nedlands.

Christensen, P., Annels, A., Liddelow, G. and Skinner, P. (1985). Vertebrate Fauna in The Southern Forests of Western Australia, A Survey. Forest Dept. of Western Australia, Bull. No. 94. Perth.

Churchill, S. (2008). Australian Bats. Second Edition, Allen & Unwin.

Christidis, L. and Boles, W.E. (2008). Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

Cogger, H.G. (2014). Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia. 7th Edition. CSIRO Publishing.

Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) (2007). Forest Black Cockatoo (Baudin’s Cockatoo - Calyptorhynchus baudinii) and Forest Red-tailed Black Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus banksii naso) Recovery Plan. Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, Western Australia.

Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) (2012a). Carnaby’s cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus latirostris) Recovery Plan. Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, Western Australia.

Page 28 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) (2012b). Chuditch (Dasyurus geoffroii) Recovery Plan. Wildlife Management Program No. 54. Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, Western Australia.

Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) (2015). Threatened and Priority Fauna Rankings. 3 November 2015.

Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) (2016). NatureMap Database search. “By Line" - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 (plus 20km buffer), accessed 31/08/2016.

Department of the Environment (DotE) (2016). EPBC Act Protected Matters Report: “By Point" - -33.80298 116.01219 (0km Buffer). Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au. Accessed 31/08/16.

Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPaC) (2012). EPBC Act Referral guidelines for three threatened black cockatoo species: Carnaby’s cockatoo (endangered) Calyptorhynchus latirostris, Baudin’s cockatoo (vulnerable) Calyptorhynchus baudinii, Forest red-tailed black cockatoo (vulnerable) Calyptorhynchus banksii naso. de Tores, P. (2008). Western Ringtail Possum Pseudocheirus occidentalis pp 253-255 in Van Dyck, S. & Strahan R. (eds). (2008). The Mammals of Australia. Queensland Museum / Reed Books.

Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) (2004). Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors - Terrestrial fauna surveys for environmental impact assessment in Western Australia. Guidance Statement No 56 EPA, Perth.

ENV Australia (2009). Millstream Dam Level Two Fauna Assessment. Unpublished report for Water Corporation.

Glauret, L. (1961). A Handbook of the Lizards of Western Australia. Handbook 6, Western Australian Naturalists Club, Perth.

Government of Western Australia (2015). Wildlife Conservation Act 1950. Wildlife Conservation (Specially Protected Fauna) Notice 2015. Government Gazette, WA. 3 November 2015.

Harewood, G. (2006). Fauna Assessment (Level 1). Bridgetown Regional Water Supply – Pipeline Route. Unpublished report for Water Corporation.

Harewood, G. (2007). Fauna Assessment (Level 1). Nannup Transfer Main. Unpublished report for Water Corporation.

Harewood, G. (2010a). Targeted Fauna Habitat Assessment South Western Highway Manjimup to Pemberton Turnoff, Manjimup. Unpublished report for MRWA.

Page 29 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Harewood, G. (2010b). Fauna Survey (Level 1). Lot 3298 Brazier Street Donnybrook. Unpublished report for Cherry View Estate Pty Ltd.

Harewood, G. (2010c). Black Cockatoo Habitat Assessment. South Western Highway (220.90 – 222.34 SLK). Unpublished report for MRWA.

Harewood, G. (2011). Fauna Habitat Assessment. Vasse Highway (68 – 80 SLK). Unpublished report for MRWA.

Harewood, G. (2015). Fauna Assessment, Wildcat Road Gravel Investigation Area, Shire of Manjimup. Unpublished report for MRWA. How, R.A., Dell, J., and Humphreys, W. F. (1987). The ground vertebrate fauna of coastal areas between Busselton and Albany, Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum 13(4):553-574.

Jackson, S. & Groves, C. (2015). Taxonomy of Australian Mammals. CSIRO Publishing.

Johnstone, R.E. (2001). Checklist of the birds of Western Australia, Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 63, 75-90.

Johnstone, R. E. (2008). Assessment of Potential Impact to Carnaby’s Cockatoo and Baudin’s Cockatoo for Southern Seawater Desalination Plant Binningup to Harvey. Prepared for URS Australia Pty Ltd.

Johnstone, R.E. and Storr, G.M. (1998). Handbook of Western Australian Birds: Volume 1 – Non-passerines (Emu to Dollarbird). Western Australian Museum, Perth Western Australia.

Johnstone, R.E. and Storr, G.M. (2004). Handbook of Western Australian Birds: Volume 2 – Passerines (Blue-winged Pitta to Goldfinch). Western Australian Museum, Perth Western Australia.

Jones, B.A,. R.A. How & D.J. Kitchener (1994). A field study of Pseudocheirus occidentalis (Marsupialia: Petauridae). II. Distribution and habitat. Population studies in Wildlife Research 21: Page(s) 175-187.

Johnstone, R. E. & Kirkby, T. (2011). Carnaby’s Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus latirostris), Baudin’s Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus baudinii) and the Forest Red-tailed Black Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus banksii naso) on the Swan Coastal Plain (Lancelin–Dunsborough), Western Australia. Studies on distribution, status, breeding, food, movements and historical changes. Report for the Department of Planning, Western Australia.

Kirkby, T. (2009). Results of Black Cockatoo Survey at Lot 2 Dawesville. Unpublished report for WA Limestone.

Maxwell S., Burbidge A. A & Morris K. (1996). The 1996 Action Plan for Australian Marsupials and Monotremes. Wildlife Australia, Canberra.

Page 30 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Menkhorst, P. and Knight, F. (2011). A Field Guide to the Mammals of Australia. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

Morcombe, M. (2004). Field Guide to Australian Birds. Steve Parish Publishing, Archerfield, Queensland.

Morgan, D., Gill, H., & Potter I. (1996). The Distribution of Freshwater Fish in the South Western Corner of Australia. Report to the Waters & Rivers Commission, Report WRT4 1996.

Morgan, D.L., Beatty, S.J., Klunzinger, M.W, Allen, M.G. and Burnham, Q.E (2011). Field Guide to the Freshwater Fishes, Crayfishes and Mussels of South Western Australia. Published by SERCUL.

Pizzey, G & Knight, F. (2012). The field guide to the birds of Australia. 9th Edition. Harper Collins, Sydney.

Saunders, D. A. (1974). Breeding biology of the ShortǦbilled form of the WhiteǦtailed Black Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus baudinii latirostris (Carnaby). Emu 74: 292Ǧ293.

Simpson, K. and Day, N. (2010). Field Guide to the Birds of Australia. Penguin Books, Ringwood.

Soderquist T. (1995). Brush-tailed Phascogale Phascogale tapoatafa. pp 104-106 in Strahan R. (ed). (1995). The Mammals of Australia. Australian Museum / Reed Books.

Storr, G.M., Smith, L.A. and Johnstone R.E. (1983). Lizards of Western Australia II: Dragons and Monitors. WA Museum, Perth.

Storr, G.M., Smith, L.A. and Johnstone R.E. (1990). Lizards of Western Australia III: Geckos and Pygopods. WA Museum, Perth.

Storr, G.M., Smith, L.A. and Johnstone R.E. (1999). Lizards of Western Australia I: Skinks. Revised Edition, WA Museum, Perth.

Storr, G.M., Smith, L.A. and Johnstone R.E. (2002). Snakes of Western Australia. Revised Edition, WA Museum, Perth.

Tyler M.J. & Doughty P. (2009). Field Guide to Frogs of Western Australia, Fourth Edition, WA Museum, Perth.

Van Dyck, S. & Strahan, R. Eds (2008). The Mammals of Australia. Third edition Queensland Museum.

Van Dyck, S., Gynther, I. & Baker, A. Eds (2013). Field Companion to The Mammals of Australia. Queensland Museum.

Page 31 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Wayne, A.F., Rooney J. F., Ward C. G., Vellios V.C., and Lindenmayer D.B. (2005). The life history of Pseudocheirus occidentalis (Pseudocheiridae) in the jarrah forest of south- western Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 53, 325-337.

Wilson, S. and Swan, G. (2013). A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia. Reed, New Holland, Sydney.

Page 32 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

FIGURES

406000 407000 408000 409000 410000 411000 6261000 6261000 Balingup

Plantations 6260000 6260000

So uth Western Highway Greenbushes State Forest 6259000 6259000 Plantations 6258000 6258000

Greenbushes State Forest

406000 407000 408000 409000 410000 411000

Legend South West Highway Padbury Hill Stage 2 Padbury_2_Survey Area_2016 O (219.345 – 220.900 SLK) 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Fauna Survey Subject Site Cadastral Boundaries Drawn: G. Harewood Meters Date: Sept 2016 and Surrounds Scale: 1:25,000 Projection/Coordinate System: UTM/MGA Zone 50 Figure: 1 408500 409000

SLK 219.345

Plantation 6259500 6259500

South Western Highway

Plantation 6259000 6259000

Greenbushes State Forest

Plantation 6258500 6258500

SLK 220.900

408500 409000

South West Highway Padbury Hill Stage 2 Legend O (219.345 – 220.900 SLK) 0 100 200 300 400 500 Fauna Survey Subject Site Subject Site Drawn: G. Harewood Air Photo Metres Date: Sept 2016 Scale: 1:7,000 Projection/Coordinate System: UTM/MGA Zone 50 Figure: 4 408500 409000 6259500 6259500

Fauna Habitats 6259000 6259000 Marri Jarra Open Forest Marri Jarrah Open Woodland Pines and Planted Eucalypts Cleared (some scattered trees)

6258500 O 6258500 0 100 200 300 400 500

Metres

408500 409000

South West Highway Legend Padbury Hill Stage 2 (219.345 – 220.900 SLK) Subject Site Fauna Survey Fauna Habitats Drawn: G. Harewood Existing Road Alignment Date: Sept 2016 Scale: 1:7,000 Projection/Coordinate System: UTM/MGA Zone 50 Figure: 3 408500 409000

Habitat Trees (DBH >50cm)

!. Tree >50cm DBH, no hollows seen !. Tree >50cm DBH, one or more hollows seen !.!.!. !. Tree >50cm DBH, one or more hollows possibly suitable for a Black Cockatoo !. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. 6259500 !. !.!. 6259500 !. !..!!.!.!.!.!.!.!. !.!.!.!.!.!. !. !.!.!. !.!. !. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!.!. !.!. !.!. !. !.!.!.!. !..!!. !.!. !.!.!. !. !. !.!. !.!. !. !. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !.!.!. !. !.!.!.!. !. !. 6259000 !. 6259000 !. !. !. !.

!. !.!.!. !. !.!.!. !.!. !.!. !.!.!. !. !. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!.!. !. !.!.!. !.!.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. !. !.!. 6258500 6258500

408500 409000

South West Highway Padbury Hill Stage 2 Legend O (219.345 – 220.900 SLK) 0 100 200 300 400 500 Fauna Survey Habitat Trees

Subject Site Drawn: G. Harewood (DBH >50cm) Metres Date: August 2016 (219.345 – 220.900 SLK) Scale: 1:7,000 Projection/Coordinate System: UTM/MGA Zone 50 Figure: 4 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

APPENDIX A

CONSERVATION CATEGORIES

EPBC Act (1999) Threatened Fauna Categories

Category Code Description There is no reasonable doubt that the last Extinct E member of the species has died. A species (a) is known only to survive in cultivation, in captivity or as a naturalised population well outside its past range; or *Extinct in the wild EW (b) has not been recorded in its known and/or expected habitat, at appropriate seasons, anywhere in its past range, despite exhaustive surveys over a time frame appropriate to its life cycle and form. A species is facing an extremely high risk of *Critically endangered CE extinction in the wild in the immediate future. A species: (a) is not critically endangered; and *Endangered EN (b) is facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future.

A species (a) is not critically endangered or endangered;

*Vulnerable VU and (b) is facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the medium-term future. A species is the focus of a specific conservation program the cessation of which would result in Conservation dependent CD the species becoming vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered (a) all migratory species that are: (i) native species; and (ii) from time to time included in the appendices to the Bonn Convention; and (b) all migratory species from time to time *Migratory Migratory included in annexes established under JAMBA, CAMBA and ROKAMBA; and (c) all native species from time to time identified

in a list established under, or an instrument made under, an international agreement approved by the Minister. Species in the list established under s248 of the Marine Ma EPBC Act

Note: Only species in those categories marked with an asterix are matters of national environmental significance under the EPBC Act.

Western Australian Wildlife Conservation Act (1950) Threatened Fauna Categories

Category Code Description Threatened Fauna (Fauna that is rare or is likely to become extinct). Taxa that have been adequately searched for and are deemed to be in the wild either rare, in danger of extinction, or otherwise in need of special protection, and have been gazetted as such.

Threatened fauna (Schedule 1) are further ranked by the DPaW according to their level of threat using IUCN Red List criteria: Schedule 1 S1

CR: Critically Endangered - considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.

EN: Endangered - considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild.

VU: Vulnerable - considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild. Fauna that is presumed to be extinct. Taxa which have been adequately searched for and there is no Schedule 2 S2 reasonable doubt that the last individual has died, and have been gazetted as such. Migratory birds protected under an international agreement. Birds that are subject to an agreement between the government of Australia and the Schedule 3 S3 governments of Japan (JAMBA), China (CAMBA) and The Republic of Korea (ROKAMBA), relating to the protection of migratory birds. Fauna declared to be in need of special protection, otherwise than for the reasons mentioned for Schedules Schedule 4 S4 1, 2 or 3, are published under Schedule 4 of the Wildlife Conservation (Specially Protected Fauna) Notice.

A list of the current rankings can be downloaded from the Parks and Wildlife Threatened Species and Communities webpage at http://dpaw.wa.gov.au/plants-and-animals/threatened-species-and-communities/

Western Australian DPaW Priority Fauna Categories

Category Code Description Species that are known from one or a few locations (generally five or less) which are potentially at risk. All occurrences are either: very small; or on lands not managed for conservation, e.g. agricultural or pastoral lands, urban areas, road and rail reserves, gravel reserves Priority 1 and active mineral leases; or otherwise under threat of habitat (Poorly Known P1 destruction or degradation. Species may be included if they are Species) comparatively well known from one or more locations but do not meet adequacy of survey requirements and appear to be under immediate threat from known threatening processes. Such species are in urgent need of further survey. Species that are known from one or a few locations (generally five or less), some of which are on lands managed primarily for nature conservation, e.g. national parks, conservation parks, nature reserves Priority 2 and other lands with secure tenure being managed for conservation. (Poorly Known P2 Species may be included if they are comparatively well known from Species) one or more locations but do not meet adequacy of survey requirements and appear to be under threat from known threatening processes. Such species are in urgent need of further survey. Species that are known from several locations, and the species does not appear to be under imminent threat, or from few but widespread locations with either large population size or significant remaining Priority 3 areas of apparently suitable habitat, much of it not under imminent (Poorly Known P3 threat. Species may be included if they are comparatively well known Species) from several locations but do not meet adequacy of survey requirements and known threatening processes exist that could affect them. Such species are in need of further survey. (a) Rare. Species that are considered to have been adequately surveyed, or for which sufficient knowledge is available, and that are considered not currently threatened or in need of special protection, but could be if present circumstances change. These Priority 4 species are usually represented on conservation lands. (Rare, Near

Threatened and P4 (b) Near Threatened. Species that are considered to have been other species in adequately surveyed and that do not qualify for Conservation need of Dependent, but that are close to qualifying for Vulnerable. monitoring )

(c) Species that have been removed from the list of threatened species during the past five years for reasons other than taxonomy. Priority Species that are not threatened but are subject to a specific Conservation P5 conservation program, the cessation of which would result in the Dependent species becoming threatened within five years. species5 *Species includes all taxa (plural of taxon - a classificatory group of any taxonomic rank, e.g. a family, , species or any infraspecific category i.e. subspecies, variety or forma). IUCN Red List Threatened Species Categories

Category Code Description Taxa for which there is no reasonable Extinct EX doubt that the last individual has died. Taxa which is known only to survive in cultivation, in captivity or and as a naturalised population well outside its Extinct in the EW past range and it has not been recorded Wild in known or expected habitat despite exhaustive survey over a time frame appropriate to its life cycle and form. Critically Taxa facing an extremely high risk of CR Endangered extinction in the wild. Taxa facing a very high risk of extinction Endangered EN in the wild. Taxa facing a high risk of extinction in the Vulnerable VU wild. Taxa which has been evaluated but does Near not qualify for CR, EN or VU now but is NT Threatened close to qualifying or likely to qualify in the near future. Taxa which has been evaluated but does Least Concern LC not qualify for CR, EN, VU, or NT but is likely to qualify for NT in the near future. Taxa for which there is inadequate information to make a direct or indirect Data Deficient DD assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status.

Not Evaluated NE Taxa which has not been evaluated.

A full list of categories and their meanings are available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories- criteria

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

APPENDIX B

FAUNA OBSERVED OR POTENTIALLY IN SUBJECT SITE

Fauna Observed or Potentially in Subject Site Compiled by Greg Harewood - Sept 2016 SW Highway - Padbury Hill Stage 2 (SLK 219.345 – 220.900) Approx. Centroid: 33.80298°S, 116.01219°E Recorded (Trapped/Sighted/Heard/Signs) = X Harewood, G. (2016). Fauna Assessment South West Highway Padbury Hill Stage 2 (SLK 219.345 – 220.900). Unpublished report for MRWA. Biologic (2011). Greenbushes Level 1 Fauna Survey. Unpublished report for Talison Lithium Australia Pty Ltd. ENV (2009). Millstream Dam Level Two Fauna Assessment. Unpublished report for Water Corporation. Christensen, P., Annels, A., Liddelow, G. and Skinner,P. (1985). Vertebrate Fauna in The Southern Forests of Western Australia, A Survey. Forest Dept. of Western Australia, Bull. No. 94. Perth. DPaW (2016). NatureMap Database Search. “By Line” SW Highway - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 (plus 20km buffer), accessed 31/08/2016.

Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Mammals Vespertilionidae Ordinary Bats

Nyctophilus geoffroyi Unidentified Long-eared Bat LC X

Amphibians Myobatrachidae Ground or Burrowing Frogs

Heleioporus eyrei Moaning Frog LC X

Limnodynastes dorsalis Banjo Frog LC X X X

Pseudophryne guentheri Güenther`s Toadlet LC X X

Reptiles Gekkonidae Geckoes

Christinus marmoratus Marbled Gecko X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 1 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Pygopodidae Legless Lizards

Lialis burtonis Common Snake Lizard

Varanidae Monitor's or Goanna's

Varanus rosenbergi Heath Monitor X X

Scincidae Skinks

Acritoscincus trilineatum South-western Cool Skink X

Cryptoblepharus buchananii Fence Skink

Ctenotus labillardieri Red-legged Skink X X

Egernia kingii King's Skink X X

Egernia napoleonis Salmon-bellied Skink X X

Hemiergis initialis Five-toed Earless Skink X

Lerista microtis microtis Southwestern Five-toed Lerista X

Menetia greyii Dwarf Skink X X

Morethia obscura Dusky Morethia X X

Tiliqua rugosa rugosa Western Bobtail X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 2 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Elapidae Elapid Snakes

Pseudonaja affinis Dugite X X

Birds Casuariidae Emus, Cassowarries

Dromaius novaehollandiae Emu Bp LC X X X X

Accipitridae Kites, Goshawks, Eagles, Harriers

Accipiter cirrocephalus Collared Sparrowhawk Bp LC X

Accipiter fasciatus Brown Goshawk Bp LC X X X

Aquila audax Wedge-tailed Eagle Bp LC X X X

Aquila morphnoides Little Eagle Bp LC X

Elanus caeruleus Black-shouldered Kite LC

Haliastur sphenurus Whistling Kite Bp LC X X

Hamirostra isura Square-tailed Kite Bp LC X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 3 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Falconidae Falcons

Falco berigora Brown Falcon Bp LC X X

Falco cenchroides Australian Kestrel LC X X

Falco longipennis Australian Hobby LC X X X

Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon S7 Bp LC X

Turnicidae Button-quails

Turnix varia Painted Button-quail Bp LC X

Columbidae Pigeons, Doves

Phaps chalcoptera Common Bronzewing Bh LC X X X X

Cacatuidae Cockatoos, Corellas

Calyptorhynchus banksii naso Forest Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo S3 VU Bp VU A2c+3c+4c X X X X X

Calyptorhynchus baudinii Baudin`s Black-Cockatoo S2 VU Bp VU C2a(ii) X X X X X

Calyptorhynchus latirostris Carnaby`s Black-Cockatoo S2 EN Bp EN A2bcde+3bcd X X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 4 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Psittacidae Parrots

Glossopsitta porphyrocephala Purple-crowned Lorikeet LC X X X

Neophema elegans Elegant Parrot LC X X X

Platycercus icterotis icterotis Western Rosella (Western ssp) Bp LC X X X

Platycercus spurius Red-capped Parrot LC X X X X X

Platycercus zonarius Australian Ringneck Parrot LC X X X X X

Polytelis anthopeplus Regent Parrot LC X

Cuculidae Parasitic Cuckoos

Cacomantis flabelliformis Fan-tailed Cuckoo LC X X X X

Chrysococcyx basalis Horsfield`s Bronze Cuckoo LC

Chrysococcyx lucidus Shining Bronze Cuckoo LC X X X X

Cuculus pallidus Pallid Cuckoo LC X

Strigidae Hawk Owls

Ninox novaeseelandiae Boobook Owl LC X X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 5 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Tytonidae Barn Owls

Tyto alba Barn Owl LC X

Tyto n. novaehollandiae Masked Owl (SW pop.) P3 Bp

Podargidae Frogmouths

Podargus strigoides Tawny Frogmouth LC X X X

Caprimulgidae Nightjars

Eurostopodus argus Spotted Nightjar LC

Aegothelidae Owlet-nightjars

Aegotheles cristatus Australian Owlet-nightjar LC X X X

Halcyonidae Tree Kingfishers

Dacelo novaeguineae Laughing Kookaburra Introduced X X X X X

Todiramphus sanctus Sacred Kingfisher LC X X

Meropidae Bee-eaters

Merops ornatus Rainbow Bee-eater S5 Mig JA LC X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 6 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Climacteridae Treecreepers

Climacteris rufa Rufous Treecreeper Bh X X X X

Maluridae Fairy Wrens, GrassWrens

Malurus elegans Red-winged Fairy-wren Be LC X X X X

Malurus splendens Splendid Fairy-wren Bh LC X X X X

Pardalotidae Pardalotes, Bristlebirds, Scrubwrens, Gerygones, Thornbills

Acanthiza apicalis Broad-tailed Thornbill Bh LC X X X X X

Acanthiza chrysorrhoa Yellow-rumped Thornbill Bh LC X X

Acanthiza inornata Western Thornbill Bh LC X X X X

Gerygone fusca Western Gerygone LC X X X X

Pardalotus punctatus Spotted Pardalote LC X X X

Pardalotus striatus Striated Pardalote LC X X X

Sericornis frontalis White-browed Scrubwren Bh LC X X X X

Smicrornis brevirostris Weebill Bh LC X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 7 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Meliphagidae Honeyeaters, Chats

Acanthorhynchus superciliosus Western Spinebill LC X X X X

Anthochaera carunculata Red Wattlebird LC X X X X

Lichenostomus virescens Singing Honeyeater LC

Lichmera indistincta Brown Honeyeater LC X X X X

Melithreptus chloropsis Western White-naped Honeyeater LC X X X

Phylidonyris nigra White-cheeked Honeyeater Bp LC

Phylidonyris novaehollandiae New Holland Honeyeater Bp LC X X X X

Petroicidae Australian Robins

Eopsaltria australis Western Yellow Robin Bh LC X X X

Eopsaltria georgiana White-breasted Robin Bh LC X X X X

Petroica multicolor Scarlet Robin Bh LC X X X X

Neosittidae Sitellas

Daphoenositta chrysoptera Varied Sittella Bh LC X X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 8 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Pachycephalidae Crested Shrike-tit, Crested Bellbird, Shrike Thrushes, Whistlers

Colluricincla harmonica Grey Shrike-thrush Bh LC X X X X

Pachycephala pectoralis Golden Whistler Bh LC X X X X X

Pachycephala rufiventris Rufous Whistler LC X X X

Dicruridae Monarchs, Magpie Lark, Flycatchers, Fantails, Drongo

Grallina cyanoleuca Magpie-lark LC X X X

Rhipidura fuliginosa Grey Fantail LC X X X X X

Rhipidura leucophrys Willie Wagtail LC X X X

Campephagidae Cuckoo-shrikes, Trillers

Coracina novaehollandiae Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike LC X X X

Lalage sueurii White-winged Triller LC X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 9 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Artamidae Woodswallows, Butcherbirds, Currawongs

Artamus cinereus Black-faced Woodswallow Bp LC X X

Artamus cyanopterus Dusky Woodswallow Bp LC X X

Cracticus tibicen Australian Magpie LC X X X X

Cracticus torquatus Grey Butcherbird LC

Strepera versicolor Grey Currawong Bp LC X X X X

Corvidae Ravens, Crows

Corvus coronoides Australian Raven LC X X X X X

Motacillidae Old World Pipits, Wagtails

Anthus novaeseelandiae Australian Pipit LC X

Dicaeidae Flowerpeckers

Dicaeum hirundinaceum Mistletoebird LC X X

Hirundinidae Swallows, Martins

Hirundo neoxena Welcome Swallow LC X X X

Hirundo nigricans Tree Martin LC X X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 10 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Sylviidae Old World Warblers

Cincloramphus cruralis Brown Songlark LC

Cincloramphus mathewsi Rufous Songlark LC X

Zosteropidae White-eyes

Zosterops lateralis Silvereye LC X X X X X

Mammals Tachyglossidae Echidnas

Tachyglossus aculeatus Echidna LC X X

Dasyuridae Carnivorous Marsupials

Antechinus flavipes Yellow-footed Antechinus LC X X X

Dasyurus geoffroii Chuditch S3 VU VU C1 X X

Phascogale tapoatafa ssp Southern Brush-tailed Phascogale S3 NT X X

Sminthopsis griseoventer Grey-bellied Dunnart LC X

Phalangeridae Brushtail Possums, Cuscuses

Trichosurus vulpecula Common Brushtail Possum LC X X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 11 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Burramyidae Pygmy Possums

Cercartetus concinnus Western Pygmy-possum LC X X

Macropodidae Kangaroos, Wallabies

Macropus fuliginosus Western Grey Kangaroo LC X X X X X

Molossidae Freetail Bats

Ozimops kitcheneri Western Freetail Bat LC X X X

Tadarida australis White-striped Freetail-bat LC X X X

Vespertilionidae Ordinary Bats

Chalinolobus gouldii Gould`s Wattled Bat LC X X X X

Chalinolobus morio Chocolate Wattled Bat LC X X X

Falsistrellus mackenziei Western False Pipistrelle P4 NT X X X

Nyctophilus geoffroyi Lesser Long-eared Bat LC X X

Nyctophilus gouldi Gould`s Long-eared Bat LC

Nyctophilus major Western Long-eared Bat

Vespadelus regulus Southern Forest Bat LC X X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 12 of 13 Class Common Conservation Harewood Biologic ('11) ENV ('09) Christensen DPaW Family ('16) Padbury Greenbushes Millstream ('85) Perup ('16) Species Name Status Hill Dam - Nature Nannup Map

Muridae Rats, Mice

Mus musculus House Mouse Introduced X X X

Rattus rattus Black Rat Introduced X X

Canidae Dogs, Foxes

Vulpes vulpes Red Fox Introduced X X X X

Felidae Cats

Felis catus Cat Introduced X X

Suidae Pigs

Sus scrofa Pig Introduced X X

Leporidae Rabbits, Hares

Oryctolagus cuniculus Rabbit Introduced X X X

WC Act Status - S1 to S7, EPBC Act Status - EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, EX = Extinct, DPaW Priority Status - P1 to P4, Int. Agmts - CA = CAMBA, JA = JAMBA, RK = ROKAMBA, Bush Forever Decreaser Species - Bh = habitat specialists, Bp = wide ranging species, Be = extinct in Perth Coastal Plain Region. IUCN Red List Category Definitions LC = Least Concern - see Appendix A and http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria for others.

Page 13 of 13 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

APPENDIX C

DPaW NATUREMAP & PROTECTED MATTERS SEARCH TOOL RESULTS

NatureMap - Padbury Hill Created By Greg Harewood on 31/08/2016

Kingdom Animalia Current Names Only Yes Core Datasets Only Yes Method 'By Line' Vertices 33° 47' 54" S,116° 00' 17" E 33° 48' 02" S,116° 00' 29" E 33° 48' 05" S,116° 00' 37" E 33° 48' Group By 19" S,116° 00' 56" E 33° 48' 29" S,116° 01' 01" E Species Group

Species Group Species Records Amphibian 10 42 Bird 154 2667 Fish 8 37 Invertebrate 129 212 Mammal 32 214 Reptile 22 112 TOTAL 355 3284

Name ID Species Name Naturalised Conservation Code 1Endemic To Query Area Amphibian 1. 25398 Crinia georgiana (Quacking Frog) 2. 25399 Crinia glauerti (Clicking Frog) 3. 25401 Crinia pseudinsignifera (Bleating Froglet) 4. 25404 Geocrinia leai (Ticking Frog) 5. 25415 Limnodynastes dorsalis (Western Banjo Frog) 6. 25378 Litoria adelaidensis (Slender Tree Frog) 7. 25388 Litoria moorei (Motorbike Frog) 8. Litoria sp. 9. 25421 Neobatrachus albipes (White-footed Trilling Frog) 10. 25433 Pseudophryne guentheri (Crawling Toadlet) Bird 11. Acanthiza (Acanthiza) apicalis subsp. apicalis 12. Acanthiza (Geobasileus) inornata 13. 24260 Acanthiza apicalis (Broad-tailed Thornbill, Inland Thornbill) 14. 24261 Acanthiza chrysorrhoa (Yellow-rumped Thornbill) 15. 24262 Acanthiza inornata (Western Thornbill) 16. 24560 Acanthorhynchus superciliosus (Western Spinebill) 17. 25536 Accipiter fasciatus (Brown Goshawk) 18. 25755 Acrocephalus australis (Australian Reed Warbler) 19. 25544 Aegotheles cristatus (Australian Owlet-nightjar) 20. 24301 Aegotheles cristatus subsp. cristatus (Australian Owlet-nightjar) 21. 24312 Anas gracilis (Grey Teal) 22. 24313 Anas platyrhynchos (Mallard) 23. 24315 Anas rhynchotis (Australasian Shoveler) 24. 24316 Anas superciliosa (Pacific Black Duck) 25. Anhinga novaehollandiae 26. 24561 Anthochaera carunculata (Red Wattlebird) 27. 24562 Anthochaera lunulata (Western Little Wattlebird) 28. 24285 Aquila audax (Wedge-tailed Eagle) 29. 41324 Ardea modesta (Eastern Great Egret) IA 30. 24341 Ardea pacifica (White-necked Heron) 31. 25566 Artamus cinereus (Black-faced Woodswallow) 32. 24353 Artamus cyanopterus (Dusky Woodswallow) 33. 24318 Aythya australis (Hardhead) 34. Barnardius zonarius 35. 24319 Biziura lobata (Musk Duck) 36. Cacatua sp. 37. 25598 Cacomantis flabelliformis (Fan-tailed Cuckoo) 38. 24427 Cacomantis flabelliformis subsp. flabelliformis (Fan-tailed Cuckoo) 39. 42307 Cacomantis pallidus (Pallid Cuckoo)

NatureMap is a collaborative project of the Department of Parks and Wildlife and the Western Australian Museum.

Page 1 Name ID Species Name Naturalised Conservation Code 1Endemic To Query Area 40. 25717 Calyptorhynchus banksii (Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo) 41. 24731 Calyptorhynchus banksii subsp. naso (Forest Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo) T 42. 24733 Calyptorhynchus baudinii (Baudin's Cockatoo (long-billed black-cockatoo), Baudin's T Cockatoo) 43. 24734 Calyptorhynchus latirostris (Carnaby's Cockatoo (short-billed black-cockatoo), T Carnaby's Cockatoo) 44. Calyptorhynchus sp. 45. 24321 Chenonetta jubata (Australian Wood Duck, Wood Duck) 46. 25601 Chrysococcyx lucidus (Shining Bronze Cuckoo) 47. 24432 Chrysococcyx lucidus subsp. plagosus (Shining Bronze Cuckoo) 48. 24834 Cincloramphus mathewsi (Rufous Songlark) 49. 24288 Circus approximans (Swamp Harrier) 50. 24289 Circus assimilis (Spotted Harrier) 51. 24396 Climacteris rufa (Rufous Treecreeper) 52. Colluricincla (Colluricincla) harmonica subsp. rufiventris 53. 25675 Colluricincla harmonica (Grey Shrike-thrush) 54. 24613 Colluricincla harmonica subsp. rufiventris (Grey Shrike-thrush) 55. 25568 Coracina novaehollandiae (Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike) 56. 25592 Corvus coronoides (Australian Raven) 57. Corvus sp. 58. 25595 Cracticus tibicen (Australian Magpie) 59. 24322 Cygnus atratus (Black Swan) 60. 30901 Dacelo novaeguineae (Laughing Kookaburra) Y 61. Daphoenositta (Neositta) chrysoptera subsp. pileata 62. 25673 Daphoenositta chrysoptera (Varied Sittella) 63. 25607 Dicaeum hirundinaceum (Mistletoebird) 64. 24470 Dromaius novaehollandiae (Emu) 65. Egretta novaehollandiae 66. Elanus axillaris 67. Elseyornis melanops 68. Eolophus roseicapillus 69. Eopsaltria (Eopsaltria) griseogularis subsp. rosinae 70. Eopsaltria (Quoyornis) georgiana 71. 24651 Eopsaltria australis subsp. griseogularis (Western Yellow Robin) 72. 24652 Eopsaltria georgiana (White-breasted Robin) 73. 24567 Epthianura albifrons (White-fronted Chat) 74. 25621 Falco berigora (Brown Falcon) 75. 24471 Falco berigora subsp. berigora (Brown Falcon) 76. 25622 Falco cenchroides (Australian Kestrel) 77. 25623 Falco longipennis (Australian Hobby) 78. 24474 Falco longipennis subsp. longipennis (Australian Hobby) 79. 25624 Falco peregrinus (Peregrine Falcon) S 80. 25727 Fulica atra (Eurasian Coot) 81. 25729 Gallinula tenebrosa (Dusky Moorhen) 82. 25530 Gerygone fusca (Western Gerygone) 83. 24735 Glossopsitta porphyrocephala (Purple-crowned Lorikeet) 84. 24443 Grallina cyanoleuca (Magpie-lark) 85. 24293 Haliaeetus leucogaster (White-bellied Sea-Eagle) IA 86. 24295 Haliastur sphenurus (Whistling Kite) 87. 24491 Hirundo neoxena (Welcome Swallow) 88. 25629 Hirundo nigricans (Tree Martin) 89. 24557 Leipoa ocellata (Malleefowl) T 90. 25661 Lichmera indistincta (Brown Honeyeater) 91. Lophoictinia isura 92. Malurus (Leggeornis) elegans 93. Malurus (Malurus) splendens subsp. splendens 94. 25650 Malurus elegans (Red-winged Fairy-wren) 95. 25654 Malurus splendens (Splendid Fairy-wren) 96. 24552 Malurus splendens subsp. splendens (Splendid Fairy-wren) 97. Melithreptus (Melithreptus) lunatus subsp. chloropsis 98. 25663 Melithreptus brevirostris (Brown-headed Honeyeater) 99. 24587 Melithreptus chloropsis (Western White-naped Honeyeater) 100. 24598 Merops ornatus (Rainbow Bee-eater) IA 101. Microcarbo melanoleucos 102. 25610 Myiagra inquieta (Restless Flycatcher) 103. 24738 Neophema elegans (Elegant Parrot) 104. 25748 Ninox novaeseelandiae (Boobook Owl) 105. 25564 Nycticorax caledonicus (Rufous Night Heron) 106. 24328 Oxyura australis (Blue-billed Duck) P4 107. Pachycephala (Pachycephala) pectoralis subsp. fuliginosa

NatureMap is a collaborative project of the Department of Parks and Wildlife and the Western Australian Museum.

Page 2 Name ID Species Name Naturalised Conservation Code 1Endemic To Query Area 108. 25679 Pachycephala pectoralis (Golden Whistler) 109. 25680 Pachycephala rufiventris (Rufous Whistler) 110. Pardalotus (Pardalotinus) striatus subsp. substriatus 111. Pardalotus (Pardalotus) punctatus subsp. punctatus 112. 25681 Pardalotus punctatus (Spotted Pardalote) 113. 24626 Pardalotus punctatus subsp. xanthopyge (Yellow-rumped Pardalote) 114. 25682 Pardalotus striatus (Striated Pardalote) 115. 24658 Petroica cucullata (Hooded Robin) 116. 24659 Petroica goodenovii (Red-capped Robin) 117. 25695 Petroica multicolor (Scarlet Robin) 118. 24660 Petroica multicolor subsp. campbelli (Scarlet Robin) 119. 25697 Phalacrocorax carbo (Great Cormorant) 120. 25698 Phalacrocorax melanoleucos (Little Pied Cormorant) 121. 24667 Phalacrocorax sulcirostris (Little Black Cormorant) 122. 25699 Phalacrocorax varius (Pied Cormorant) 123. 24409 Phaps chalcoptera (Common Bronzewing) 124. Phylidonyris (Meliornis) novaehollandiae 125. Phylidonyris (Meliornis) novaehollandiae subsp. longirostris 126. 24596 Phylidonyris novaehollandiae (New Holland Honeyeater) 127. 24841 Platalea flavipes (Yellow-billed Spoonbill) 128. 25720 Platycercus icterotis (Western Rosella) 129. 24745 Platycercus icterotis subsp. icterotis (Western Rosella) 130. 24747 Platycercus spurius (Red-capped Parrot) 131. 24750 Platycercus zonarius subsp. semitorquatus (Twenty-eight Parrot) 132. 24751 Platycercus zonarius subsp. zonarius (Port Lincoln Parrot) 133. 25703 Podargus strigoides (Tawny Frogmouth) 134. 24679 Podargus strigoides subsp. brachypterus (Tawny Frogmouth) 135. 25704 Podiceps cristatus (Great Crested Grebe) 136. 24681 Poliocephalus poliocephalus (Hoary-headed Grebe) 137. 30854 Polytelis anthopeplus subsp. westralis (Regent Parrot) 138. 25731 Porphyrio porphyrio (Purple Swamphen) 139. 24771 Porzana tabuensis (Spotless Crake) 140. Purpureicephalus spurius 141. 24773 Rallus pectoralis subsp. clelandi (Lewin's Rail) XY 142. 25613 Rhipidura fuliginosa (Grey Fantail) 143. 25614 Rhipidura leucophrys (Willie Wagtail) 144. Sericornis (Sericornis) frontalis 145. 25534 Sericornis frontalis (White-browed Scrubwren) 146. 30948 Smicrornis brevirostris (Weebill) 147. Stagonopleura (Zonaeginthus) oculata 148. 24645 Stagonopleura oculata (Red-eared Firetail) 149. 24529 Sterna leucoptera (White-winged Black Tern) IA 150. 24329 Stictonetta naevosa (Freckled Duck) 151. 25597 Strepera versicolor (Grey Currawong) 152. 25590 Streptopelia senegalensis (Laughing Turtle-Dove) Y 153. 25752 Sturnus vulgaris (Common Starling) Y 154. 25705 Tachybaptus novaehollandiae (Australasian Grebe, Black-throated Grebe) 155. 24331 Tadorna tadornoides (Australian Shelduck, Mountain Duck) 156. 24844 Threskiornis molucca (Australian White Ibis) 157. 24845 Threskiornis spinicollis (Straw-necked Ibis) 158. 25549 Todiramphus sanctus (Sacred Kingfisher) 159. Tribonyx ventralis 160. 24851 Turnix velox (Little Button-quail) 161. 25764 Tyto novaehollandiae (Masked Owl) 162. 24855 Tyto novaehollandiae subsp. novaehollandiae (Masked Owl (southern subsp)) P3 163. 25765 Zosterops lateralis (Grey-breasted White-eye, Silvereye) 164. 24856 Zosterops lateralis subsp. gouldi (Grey-breasted White-eye) Fish 165. ? ? 166. Bostockia porosa 167. Edelia vittata 168. 34028 Galaxias occidentalis (Western Minnow) 169. 34027 Galaxiella nigrostriata (Black-stripe Minnow) P3 170. Lepidogalaxias salamandroides 171. Nannoperca vittata 172. Perca fluviatilis Invertebrate 173. Aganippe rhaphiduca 174. Agraptocorixa eurynome

NatureMap is a collaborative project of the Department of Parks and Wildlife and the Western Australian Museum.

Page 3 Name ID Species Name Naturalised Conservation Code 1Endemic To Query Area 175. Ambicodamus marae 176. Amitermes obeuntis 177. Antiporus sp. 178. Araneus cyphoxis 179. Araneus senicaudatus 180. Arbanitis sp. Y 181. Archiargiolestes pusillus 182. Argiope protensa 183. Aturidae sp. 184. Austracantha minax 185. Australiobates sp. 186. Austrolichtensia hakearum Y 187. Austropeplea sp. 188. Bolborhachium recticorne 189. Calanoida sp. 190. Ceinidae sp. 191. Celaenia excavata 192. Ceratopogonidae sp. 193. Cherax quinquecarinatus 194. Cherax sp. 195. Chironomus aff. alternans (V24) (CB) 196. Chironomus tepperi 197. Copelatus sp. 198. Copepoda sp. 199. Coptotermes acinaciformis subsp. raffrayi 200. Corynoneura sp. (V49) (SAP) 201. Craspedacusta sowerbii Y 202. Cricotopus 'parbicinctus' 203. Culicidae sp. 204. Cyclopoida sp. 205. Cyclosa trilobata 206. Deroceras sp. 207. Diaprepocoris barycephalus Y 208. Dicrotendipes sp. A (V47) (SAP) 209. Dolichopodidae sp. 210. Empididae sp. 211. Enchytraeidae sp. 212. Euoplos festivus Y 213. Glyptophysa (Glyptophysa) georgiana 214. Gymnometriocnemus sp. 1 (=V44 = ortho sp. C & R) 215. Gymnometriocnemus sp. 2 (=V45=spA&B=ortho sp. O) 216. Harrisius sp. A (SAP) 217. Harrisius sp. B (SFM) 218. Hedana gracilis Y 219. Hednota crypsichroa 220. Hednota pedionoma 221. Hemicordulia australiae 222. Heterotermes occiduus 223. Heterotermes platycephalus 224. Heurodes turritus 225. Hydryphantidae sp. 226. Iridomyrmex turbineus 227. Kiefferulus martini 228. Latrodectus hasseltii 229. Leioproctus (euryglossidia) 230. Leptoperla australica 231. Limbodessus inornatus 232. Longepi woodman 233. Lycosa leuckartii 234. Lymnaeidae sp. 235. Maratus pavonis 236. Microcerotermes newmani 237. Missulena granulosa 238. Muscidae sp. 239. Myrmecia analis 240. Myrmecia clarki 241. Myrmecia nigriceps 242. Myrmecia vindex 243. Naididae sp. 244. Nanometa gentilis

NatureMap is a collaborative project of the Department of Parks and Wildlife and the Western Australian Museum.

Page 4 Name ID Species Name Naturalised Conservation Code 1Endemic To Query Area 245. Naupactus leucoloma 246. Necterosoma darwini 247. Nematoda sp. 248. Neoniphargidae sp. 249. Notonecta (Enitharonecta) handlirschi 250. Nousia sp. AV16 251. Nyungara bunni 252. Occasitermes occasus 253. Ocrisiona leucocomis 254. Oniscidae sp. 255. Opisthopora sp. 256. Orthocladiinae 'woodminer' (SAP) 257. Orthocladiinae sp. 258. Ostracoda (unident.) 259. Paraborniella tonnoiri 260. Paracapritermes kraepelinii 261. Parakiefferiella variegatus 262. Paralimnophyes pullulus (V42) 263. Paramelitidae sp. 264. Paramerina levidensis 265. Parastacidae sp. 266. Pentaneurini genus V20 267. Perthiidae sp. 268. Phreodrilidae sp. 269. Pionidae sp. 270. Planorbidae sp. 271. Polypedilum nr. convexum (SAP) 272. Polypedilum watsoni 273. Procladius paludicola 274. Rhinotia brunnea 275. Rhodothemis lieftincki 276. Rhytidoponera inornata 277. Riekoperla occidentalis 278. Saprinus (Saprinus) cyaneus 279. Saprinus sp. 280. Scirtidae sp. 281. Simuliidae sp. 282. Sinumelon kalgum 283. Sternopriscus browni 284. Symmetrischema tangolias Y 285. Symonicoccus australis 286. Symonicoccus sp. Y 287. Tanytarsus aff manleyensis 288. Tanytarsus b1 289. Tanytarsus fuscithorax/semibarbitarsus 290. Tanytarsus nr K5 291. Tapeigaster paramonovi 292. Tasmanicosa leuckartii 293. Tetragnatha nitens 294. Teyl sp. 295. Thienemanniella sp. (V19) (SAP) 296. Tipulidae sp. 297. Triplectides sp. AV21 (SFM) 298. Trombidioidea sp. 299. Urodacus novaehollandiae 300. Venatrix pullastra 301. Xylochomitermes occidualis Mammal 302. 25449 Antechinus flavipes (Yellow-footed Antechinus) 303. 24086 Cercartetus concinnus (Western Pygmy-possum, Mundarda) 304. 24186 Chalinolobus gouldii (Gould's Wattled Bat) 305. 24187 Chalinolobus morio (Chocolate Wattled Bat) 306. 24092 Dasyurus geoffroii (Chuditch, Western Quoll) T 307. 24189 Falsistrellus mackenziei (Western False Pipistrelle) P4 308. 24215 Hydromys chrysogaster (Water-rat) P4 309. 25478 Isoodon obesulus (Southern Brown Bandicoot) P5 310. 24153 Isoodon obesulus subsp. fusciventer (Quenda, Southern Brown Bandicoot) P5 311. 24132 Macropus fuliginosus (Western Grey Kangaroo) 312. 24133 Macropus irma (Western Brush Wallaby) P4 313. 24168 Macrotis lagotis (Bilby, Dalgyte)

NatureMap is a collaborative project of the Department of Parks and Wildlife and the Western Australian Museum.

Page 5 Name ID Species Name Naturalised Conservation Code 1Endemic To Query Area T 314. 24184 Mormopterus planiceps (Southern Freetail-bat) 315. 24223 Mus musculus (House Mouse) Y 316. 24146 Myrmecobius fasciatus (Numbat, Walpurti) T 317. 24194 Nyctophilus geoffroyi (Lesser Long-eared Bat) 318. 24085 Oryctolagus cuniculus (Rabbit) Y 319. 24098 Phascogale calura (Red-tailed Phascogale, Kenngoor) T 320. 25508 Phascogale tapoatafa (Brush-tailed Phascogale) 321. 24099 Phascogale tapoatafa subsp. tapoatafa (Southern Brush-tailed Phascogale, T Wambenger) 322. 24166 Pseudocheirus occidentalis (Western Ringtail Possum) T 323. 24243 Rattus fuscipes (Western Bush Rat) 324. 24245 Rattus rattus (Black Rat) Y 325. 24145 Setonix brachyurus (Quokka) T 326. 24111 Sminthopsis gilberti (Gilbert's Dunnart) 327. Sminthopsis sp. 328. 24259 Sus scrofa (Pig) Y 329. 24207 Tachyglossus aculeatus (Short-beaked Echidna) 330. 24185 Tadarida australis (White-striped Freetail-bat) 331. 24158 Trichosurus vulpecula subsp. vulpecula (Common Brushtail Possum) 332. 24206 Vespadelus regulus (Southern Forest Bat) 333. 24040 Vulpes vulpes (Red Fox) Y Reptile 334. 24990 Aprasia pulchella (Granite Worm-lizard) 335. Chelodina (Macrochelodina) oblonga 336. 24980 Christinus marmoratus (Marbled Gecko) 337. 25035 Ctenotus delli (Dell's Ctenotus, Darling Range Heath Ctenotus) P4 338. 25049 Ctenotus labillardieri 339. 25096 Egernia kingii (King's Skink) 340. 25100 Egernia napoleonis 341. 25115 Hemiergis initialis subsp. initialis 342. 25475 Hemiergis peronii 343. 25117 Hemiergis peronii subsp. peronii 344. 25118 Hemiergis peronii subsp. tridactyla 345. 25131 Lerista distinguenda 346. 25184 Menetia greyii 347. 25240 Morelia spilota subsp. imbricata (Carpet Python) S 348. 25191 Morethia lineoocellata 349. 25192 Morethia obscura 350. 25259 Pseudonaja affinis subsp. affinis (Dugite) 351. 25206 Tiliqua rugosa subsp. palarra 352. 25207 Tiliqua rugosa subsp. rugosa 353. 25225 Varanus rosenbergi (Heath Monitor) 354. Varanus sp. 355. 25526 Varanus tristis (Racehorse Monitor)

Conservation Codes T - Rare or likely to become extinct X - Presumed extinct IA - Protected under international agreement S - Other specially protected fauna 1 - Priority 1 2 - Priority 2 3 - Priority 3 4 - Priority 4 5 - Priority 5

1 For NatureMap's purposes, species flagged as endemic are those whose records are wholely contained within the search area. Note that only those records complying with the search criterion are included in the calculation. For example, if you limit records to those from a specific datasource, only records from that datasource are used to determine if a species is restricted to the query area.

NatureMap is a collaborative project of the Department of Parks and Wildlife and the Western Australian Museum.

Page 6 EPBC Act Protected Matters Report

This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected.

Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report.

Information is available about Environment Assessments and the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details.

Report created: 31/08/16 11:04:08

Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements

This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010

Coordinates Buffer: 0.0Km Summary

Matters of National Environmental Significance

This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance.

World Heritage Properties: None National Heritage Places: None Wetlands of International Importance: None Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Area: None Listed Threatened Ecological Communities: None Listed Threatened Species: 8 Listed Migratory Species: 3

Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act

This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated. Approval may be required for a proposed activity that significantly affects the environment on Commonwealth land, when the action is outside the Commonwealth land, or the environment anywhere when the action is taken on Commonwealth land. Approval may also be required for the Commonwealth or Commonwealth agencies proposing to take an action that is likely to have a significant impact on the environment anywhere.

The EPBC Act protects the environment on Commonwealth land, the environment from the actions taken on Commonwealth land, and the environment from actions taken by Commonwealth agencies. As heritage values of a place are part of the 'environment', these aspects of the EPBC Act protect the Commonwealth Heritage values of a Commonwealth Heritage place. Information on the new heritage laws can be found at http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage

A permit may be required for activities in or on a Commonwealth area that may affect a member of a listed threatened species or ecological community, a member of a listed migratory species, whales and other cetaceans, or a member of a listed marine species.

Commonwealth Land: None Commonwealth Heritage Places: None Listed Marine Species: 7 Whales and Other Cetaceans: None Critical Habitats: None Commonwealth Reserves Terrestrial: None Commonwealth Reserves Marine: None

Extra Information

This part of the report provides information that may also be relevant to the area you have nominated.

State and Territory Reserves: None Regional Forest Agreements: 1 Invasive Species: 14 Nationally Important Wetlands: None Key Ecological Features (Marine) None Details

Matters of National Environmental Significance

Listed Threatened Species [ Resource Information ] Name Status Type of Presence Birds Calyptorhynchus banksii naso Forest Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo, Karrak [67034] Vulnerable Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Calyptorhynchus baudinii Baudin's Cockatoo, Baudin's Black-Cockatoo, Long- Vulnerable Breeding likely to occur billed Black-Cockatoo [769] within area Calyptorhynchus latirostris Carnaby's Black-Cockatoo, Short-billed Black- Endangered Breeding likely to occur Cockatoo [59523] within area Mammals Dasyurus geoffroii Chuditch, Western Quoll [330] Vulnerable Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Pseudocheirus occidentalis Western Ringtail Possum, Ngwayir, Womp, Woder, Vulnerable Species or species habitat Ngoor, Ngoolangit [25911] may occur within area

Setonix brachyurus Quokka [229] Vulnerable Species or species habitat may occur within area

Plants Caladenia hoffmanii Hoffman's Spider-orchid [56719] Endangered Species or species habitat may occur within area

Diuris micrantha Dwarf Bee-orchid [55082] Vulnerable Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Listed Migratory Species [ Resource Information ] * Species is listed under a different scientific name on the EPBC Act - Threatened Species list. Name Threatened Type of Presence Migratory Marine Birds Apus pacificus Fork-tailed Swift [678] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Migratory Terrestrial Species Motacilla cinerea Grey Wagtail [642] Species or species habitat may occur within area

Migratory Wetlands Species Pandion haliaetus Osprey [952] Species or species Name Threatened Type of Presence habitat may occur within area

Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Listed Marine Species [ Resource Information ] * Species is listed under a different scientific name on the EPBC Act - Threatened Species list. Name Threatened Type of Presence Birds Apus pacificus Fork-tailed Swift [678] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Ardea alba Great Egret, White Egret [59541] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Ardea ibis Cattle Egret [59542] Species or species habitat may occur within area

Haliaeetus leucogaster White-bellied Sea-Eagle [943] Species or species habitat may occur within area

Merops ornatus Rainbow Bee-eater [670] Species or species habitat may occur within area

Motacilla cinerea Grey Wagtail [642] Species or species habitat may occur within area

Pandion haliaetus Osprey [952] Species or species habitat may occur within area Extra Information Regional Forest Agreements [ Resource Information ] Note that all areas with completed RFAs have been included. Name State South West WA RFA Western Australia

Invasive Species [ Resource Information ] Weeds reported here are the 20 species of national significance (WoNS), along with other introduced plants that are considered by the States and Territories to pose a particularly significant threat to biodiversity. The following feral animals are reported: Goat, Red Fox, Cat, Rabbit, Pig, Water Buffalo and Cane Toad. Maps from Landscape Health Project, National Land and Water Resouces Audit, 2001.

Name Status Type of Presence Birds Anas platyrhynchos Mallard [974] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Columba livia Rock Pigeon, Rock Dove, Domestic Pigeon [803] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Streptopelia senegalensis Laughing Turtle-dove, Laughing Dove [781] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Sturnus vulgaris Common Starling [389] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Mammals Felis catus Cat, House Cat, Domestic Cat [19] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Mus musculus House Mouse [120] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Oryctolagus cuniculus Rabbit, European Rabbit [128] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Rattus rattus Black Rat, Ship Rat [84] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Sus scrofa Pig [6] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Vulpes vulpes Red Fox, Fox [18] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area

Plants Asparagus asparagoides Bridal Creeper, Bridal Veil Creeper, Smilax, Florist's Species or species habitat Smilax, Smilax Asparagus [22473] likely to occur within area

Genista sp. X Genista monspessulana Broom [67538] Species or species habitat may occur within area

Pinus radiata Radiata Pine Monterey Pine, Insignis Pine, Wilding Species or species habitat Pine [20780] may occur within area Name Status Type of Presence Rubus fruticosus aggregate Blackberry, European Blackberry [68406] Species or species habitat likely to occur within area Caveat The information presented in this report has been provided by a range of data sources as acknowledged at the end of the report. This report is designed to assist in identifying the locations of places which may be relevant in determining obligations under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. It holds mapped locations of World and National Heritage properties, Wetlands of International and National Importance, Commonwealth and State/Territory reserves, listed threatened, migratory and marine species and listed threatened ecological communities. Mapping of Commonwealth land is not complete at this stage. Maps have been collated from a range of sources at various resolutions.

Not all species listed under the EPBC Act have been mapped (see below) and therefore a report is a general guide only. Where available data supports mapping, the type of presence that can be determined from the data is indicated in general terms. People using this information in making a referral may need to consider the qualifications below and may need to seek and consider other information sources.

For threatened ecological communities where the distribution is well known, maps are derived from recovery plans, State vegetation maps, remote sensing imagery and other sources. Where threatened ecological community distributions are less well known, existing vegetation maps and point location data are used to produce indicative distribution maps.

For species where the distributions are well known, maps are digitised from sources such as recovery plans and detailed habitat studies. Where appropriate, core breeding, foraging and roosting areas are indicated under 'type of presence'. For species whose distributions are less well known, point locations are collated from government wildlife authorities, museums, and non-government organisations; bioclimatic distribution models are generated and these validated by experts. In some cases, the distribution maps are based solely on expert knowledge.

Only selected species covered by the following provisions of the EPBC Act have been mapped: - migratory and - marine The following species and ecological communities have not been mapped and do not appear in reports produced from this database: - threatened species listed as extinct or considered as vagrants - some species and ecological communities that have only recently been listed - some terrestrial species that overfly the Commonwealth marine area - migratory species that are very widespread, vagrant, or only occur in small numbers The following groups have been mapped, but may not cover the complete distribution of the species: - non-threatened seabirds which have only been mapped for recorded breeding sites - seals which have only been mapped for breeding sites near the Australian continent Such breeding sites may be important for the protection of the Commonwealth Marine environment.

Coordinates

-33.80298 116.01219 Acknowledgements This database has been compiled from a range of data sources. The department acknowledges the following custodians who have contributed valuable data and advice: -Office of Environment and Heritage, New South Wales -Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Victoria -Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania -Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia -Parks and Wildlife Commission NT, Northern Territory Government -Department of Environmental and Heritage Protection, Queensland -Department of Parks and Wildlife, Western Australia -Environment and Planning Directorate, ACT -Birdlife Australia -Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme -Australian National Wildlife Collection -Natural history museums of Australia -Museum Victoria -Australian Museum -South Australian Museum -Queensland Museum -Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums -Queensland Herbarium -National Herbarium of NSW -Royal Botanic Gardens and National Herbarium of Victoria -Tasmanian Herbarium -State Herbarium of South Australia -Northern Territory Herbarium -Western Australian Herbarium -Australian National Herbarium, Atherton and Canberra -University of New England -Ocean Biogeographic Information System -Australian Government, Department of Defence Forestry Corporation, NSW -Geoscience Australia -CSIRO -Other groups and individuals

The Department is extremely grateful to the many organisations and individuals who provided expert advice and information on numerous draft distributions.

Please feel free to provide feedback via the Contact Us page.

© Commonwealth of Australia Department of the Environment GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia +61 2 6274 1111 MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

APPENDIX D

HABITAT TREE DETAILS

+DELWDW7UHHV '%+!FP 'DWXP*'$

dƌĞĞ EƵŵďĞƌ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ WŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů tĂLJƉŽŝŶƚ ^ŝĚĞŽĨ ,ŽůůŽǁdLJƉĞ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ŽŶĞ ŵ ŵE dƌĞĞ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽĨ ^ŝnjĞϭ ^ŝnjĞϮ ^ŝnjĞϯ ^ŝnjĞϰ ^ŝnjĞϱ KĐĐƵƉĂŶĐLJ ŚĞǁDĂƌŬƐ ŽĐŬĂƚŽŽ ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ EƵŵďĞƌ ZŽĂĚ ϭ dLJƉĞϮ dLJƉĞϯ dLJƉĞϰ dLJƉĞϱ ;ŵͿ ,ŽůůŽǁƐ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ EĞƐƚ,ŽůůŽǁ

ǁƉƚϬϬϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϲϯ ϲϮϱϵϮϯϱ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϬϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϱϲ ϲϮϱϵϮϯϴ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϬϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϱϯ ϲϮϱϵϮϰϮ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϬϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϰϵ ϲϮϱϵϮϰϲ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϬϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϯϵ ϲϮϱϵϮϱϭ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϬϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϯϳ ϲϮϱϵϮϱϳ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϬϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϯϭ ϲϮϱϵϮϲϳ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϬϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϭϭ ϲϮϱϵϮϴϮ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϬϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϭϭ ϲϮϱϵϮϴϱ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϵϯ ϲϮϱϵϯϬϳ t ĞĂĚhŶŬŶŽǁŶ ϮϬн ϱн ƌĂŶĐŚ фϱ ƌĂŶĐŚ фϱ ƌĂŶĐŚ фϱ ƌĂŶĐŚ фϱ ƌĂŶĐŚ фϱ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ĞƉƚŚŽĨŚŽůůŽǁƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ ǁƉƚϬϭϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϴϭ ϲϮϱϵϯϭϯ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϳϯ ϲϮϱϵϯϮϬ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϯϳ ϲϮϱϵϯϱϵ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϮϵ ϲϮϱϵϯϲϰ t ĞĂĚ:ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϮϳ ϲϮϱϵϯϲϰ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϭϬ ϲϮϱϵϯϳϮ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϬϳ ϲϮϱϵϯϳϴ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϴϮ ϲϮϱϵϯϵϭ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϭϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϴϮ ϲϮϱϵϯϵϭ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϬͲϭϱ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϳϲ ϲϮϱϵϰϬϭ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϳϱ ϲϮϱϵϰϬϭ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϲϯ ϲϮϱϵϰϬϰ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϱϵ ϲϮϱϵϰϬϳ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϰϰ ϲϮϱϵϰϭϳ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϯϵ ϲϮϱϵϰϭϲ t ĞĂĚDĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϯϱ ϲϮϱϵϰϭϲ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϮϵ ϲϮϱϵϰϭϴ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϮϵ ϲϮϱϵϰϭϲ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϮϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϮϱ ϲϮϱϵϰϮϭ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϭϱ ϲϮϱϵϰϭϴ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϮϵϲ ϲϮϱϵϰϯϰ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϮϰϴ ϲϮϱϵϰϱϯ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϭϲϯ ϲϮϱϵϰϴϴ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϬϭ ϲϮϱϵϲϴϬ  ĞĂĚ:ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн ϭ ƌĂŶĐŚ ϱͲϭϬ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ĞƉƚŚŽĨŚŽůůŽǁƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ ǁƉƚϬϯϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϮϭ ϲϮϱϵϲϴϬ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϭϮ ϲϮϱϵϲϴϱ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϱϯ ϲϮϱϵϲϯϰ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϳϮ ϲϮϱϵϲϭϮ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϯϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϳϰ ϲϮϱϵϲϬϴ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϰϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϴϮ ϲϮϱϵϲϭϬ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϰϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϵϮ ϲϮϱϵϲϬϱ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϰϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϬϵϲ ϲϮϱϵϱϴϬ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϰϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϭϱϰ ϲϮϱϵϱϰϭ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн ϭ <ŶŽƚ,ŽůĞ ϭϬͲϮϬ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ zĞƐ ĞƉƚŚŽĨŚŽůůŽǁƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ ǁƉƚϬϰϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϭϲϬ ϲϮϱϵϱϮϳ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϰϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϭϳϮ ϲϮϱϵϱϯϮ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϰϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϭϲϴ ϲϮϱϵϱϮϰ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϰϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϭϵϮ ϲϮϱϵϱϬϳ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ dƌĞĞ EƵŵďĞƌ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ WŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů tĂLJƉŽŝŶƚ ^ŝĚĞŽĨ ,ŽůůŽǁdLJƉĞ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ŽŶĞ ŵ ŵE dƌĞĞ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽĨ ^ŝnjĞϭ ^ŝnjĞϮ ^ŝnjĞϯ ^ŝnjĞϰ ^ŝnjĞϱ KĐĐƵƉĂŶĐLJ ŚĞǁDĂƌŬƐ ŽĐŬĂƚŽŽ ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ EƵŵďĞƌ ZŽĂĚ ϭ dLJƉĞϮ dLJƉĞϯ dLJƉĞϰ dLJƉĞϱ ;ŵͿ ,ŽůůŽǁƐ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ EĞƐƚ,ŽůůŽǁ

ǁƉƚϬϰϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϮϭϴ ϲϮϱϵϰϵϱ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϰϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϮϭϳ ϲϮϱϵϱϬϭ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϮϮϰ ϲϮϱϵϰϵϱ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϮϳϭ ϲϮϱϵϰϳϵ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϮϳϮ ϲϮϱϵϰϳϯ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϮϳϵ ϲϮϱϵϰϳϯ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϭϴ ϲϮϱϵϰϱϮ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϮϲ ϲϮϱϵϰϱϴ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϰϬ ϲϮϱϵϰϯϵ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϰϱ ϲϮϱϵϰϯϵ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϰϳ ϲϮϱϵϰϯϲ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϱϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϱϳ ϲϮϱϵϰϰϭ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϲϳ ϲϮϱϵϰϰϭ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϲϴ ϲϮϱϵϰϯϳ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϳϯ ϲϮϱϵϰϯϴ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϳϳ ϲϮϱϵϰϰϰ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϳϱ ϲϮϱϵϰϰϬ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϳϵ ϲϮϱϵϰϰϮ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϵϯ ϲϮϱϵϰϰϰ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϯϵϯ ϲϮϱϵϰϰϭ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϬϮ ϲϮϱϵϰϯϯ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϲϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϭϮ ϲϮϱϵϰϯϱ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϭϭ ϲϮϱϵϰϮϴ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϭϳ ϲϮϱϵϰϬϰ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϬͲϭϱ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϮϯ ϲϮϱϵϰϬϭ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϯϵ ϲϮϱϵϯϴϮ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϰϲϰ ϲϮϱϵϯϱϳ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϭϰ ϲϮϱϵϯϭϳ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϯϰ ϲϮϱϵϮϵϴ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϮϱ ϲϮϱϵϮϬϵ  ĞĂĚDĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϯϮ ϲϮϱϵϮϭϮ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϳϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϲϵ ϲϮϱϵϭϴϬ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϳϮϬ ϲϮϱϵϭϯϯ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϳϯϭ ϲϮϱϵϭϮϯ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϳϲϴ ϲϮϱϵϬϵϮ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϬϱ ϲϮϱϵϬϲϮ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϭϴ ϲϮϱϵϬϱϴ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϯϮ ϲϮϱϵϬϰϮ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϰϬ ϲϮϱϵϬϯϲ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϱϬ ϲϮϱϵϬϯϵ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϱϲ ϲϮϱϵϬϭϴ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϴϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϱϰ ϲϮϱϵϬϬϳ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϲϲ ϲϮϱϴϵϵϲ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϵϮ ϲϮϱϴϵϳϳ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϵϭ ϲϮϱϴϵϲϱ  ĞĂĚDĂƌƌŝ ϭϬͲϭϱ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϭϯ ϲϮϱϴϵϯϮ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϭϴ ϲϮϱϴϵϬϴ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϭϲ ϲϮϱϴϵϬϯ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϱϬ ϲϮϱϴϴϮϬ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϱϲ ϲϮϱϴϴϮϬ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϬϵϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϲϰ ϲϮϱϴϴϬϵ  ĞĂĚDĂƌƌŝ ϭϬͲϭϱ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ dƌĞĞ EƵŵďĞƌ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ WŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů tĂLJƉŽŝŶƚ ^ŝĚĞŽĨ ,ŽůůŽǁdLJƉĞ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ŽŶĞ ŵ ŵE dƌĞĞ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽĨ ^ŝnjĞϭ ^ŝnjĞϮ ^ŝnjĞϯ ^ŝnjĞϰ ^ŝnjĞϱ KĐĐƵƉĂŶĐLJ ŚĞǁDĂƌŬƐ ŽĐŬĂƚŽŽ ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ EƵŵďĞƌ ZŽĂĚ ϭ dLJƉĞϮ dLJƉĞϯ dLJƉĞϰ dLJƉĞϱ ;ŵͿ ,ŽůůŽǁƐ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ EĞƐƚ,ŽůůŽǁ

ǁƉƚϬϵϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϴϯ ϲϮϱϴϳϳϬ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϴϲ ϲϮϱϴϳϲϰ  hŶŬŶŽǁŶƵĐ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϱϵ ϲϮϱϴϳϬϮ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϴϯ ϲϮϱϴϲϱϴ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϴϮ ϲϮϱϴϲϰϲ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϵϭ ϲϮϱϴϲϯϮ  DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϮϲ ϲϮϱϴϱϵϯ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϱϳ ϲϮϱϴϱϲϴ  :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϴϭ ϲϮϱϴϱϱϯ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϬϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϴϮ ϲϮϱϴϱϰϵ  DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϭϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϰϲ ϲϮϱϴϱϯϮ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϭϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϰϮ ϲϮϱϴϱϯϲ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϭϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϮϬ ϲϮϱϴϱϱϬ t ĞĂĚDĂƌƌŝ ϱͲϭϬ ϭ ^ƉŽƵƚdƌƵŶŬ ϮϬн EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ zĞƐ WŽƐƐŝďůLJƚŽŽƐŚĂůůŽǁ ǁƉƚϭϭϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϭϮ ϲϮϱϴϱϲϬ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϭϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϭϬϱ ϲϮϱϴϱϳϰ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϭϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϵϮ ϲϮϱϴϱϲϱ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ ϭ ^ƉŽƵƚƌĂŶĐŚ ϱͲϭϬ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ĞƉƚŚŽĨŚŽůůŽǁƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ ǁƉƚϭϭϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϵϯ ϲϮϱϴϱϴϬ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϭϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϵϬ ϲϮϱϴϱϵϬ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϭϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϴϴ ϲϮϱϴϱϵϮ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϭϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϳϰ ϲϮϱϴϲϬϭ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϲϲ ϲϮϱϴϱϵϰ t ĞĂĚ:ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϲϲ ϲϮϱϴϲϬϱ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϲϰ ϲϮϱϴϲϬϵ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϲϯ ϲϮϱϴϲϭϯ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϱϮ ϲϮϱϴϲϭϵ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϯϳ ϲϮϱϴϲϯϬ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϯϵ ϲϮϱϴϲϮϴ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϯϱ ϲϮϱϴϲϯϯ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϯϯ ϲϮϱϴϲϯϲ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϮϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϭϵ ϲϮϱϴϲϰϲ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϭϰ ϲϮϱϴϲϱϲ t ĞĂĚ:ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϭϭ ϲϮϱϴϲϱϳ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϵϬϬϲ ϲϮϱϴϲϲϳ t ĞĂĚDĂƌƌŝ ϭϬͲϭϱ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϵϮ ϲϮϱϴϲϳϵ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϳϮ ϲϮϱϴϳϬϬ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϳϲ ϲϮϱϴϲϵϵ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϲϲ ϲϮϱϴϳϬϴ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϲϮ ϲϮϱϴϳϯϱ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϱϭ ϲϮϱϴϳϰϭ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϯϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϰϱ ϲϮϱϴϳϲϬ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϰϭ ϲϮϱϴϳϲϮ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϯϴ ϲϮϱϴϳϲϱ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϰϭ ϲϮϱϴϳϴϲ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϵϮϲ ϲϮϱϴϴϮϴ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϴϰ ϲϮϱϴϵϮϱ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϳϮ ϲϮϱϴϵϰϯ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϱϯ ϲϮϱϴϵϳϯ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ >ĂƌŐĞŶĞƐƚ;ZĂǀĞŶͬŽWͿ ǁƉƚϭϰϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϱϭ ϲϮϱϴϵϳϵ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϯϯ ϲϮϱϵϬϬϲ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϰϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϮϬ ϲϮϱϵϬϭϬ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϭϲ ϲϮϱϵϬϭϲ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ dƌĞĞ EƵŵďĞƌ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ WŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů tĂLJƉŽŝŶƚ ^ŝĚĞŽĨ ,ŽůůŽǁdLJƉĞ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ,ŽůůŽǁ ŽŶĞ ŵ ŵE dƌĞĞ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ŽĨ ^ŝnjĞϭ ^ŝnjĞϮ ^ŝnjĞϯ ^ŝnjĞϰ ^ŝnjĞϱ KĐĐƵƉĂŶĐLJ ŚĞǁDĂƌŬƐ ŽĐŬĂƚŽŽ ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ EƵŵďĞƌ ZŽĂĚ ϭ dLJƉĞϮ dLJƉĞϯ dLJƉĞϰ dLJƉĞϱ ;ŵͿ ,ŽůůŽǁƐ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ ;ĐŵͿ EĞƐƚ,ŽůůŽǁ

ǁƉƚϭϱϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϭϱ ϲϮϱϵϬϭϯ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϮϲ ϲϮϱϵϬϭϯ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϴϭϴ ϲϮϱϵϬϮϰ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϳϴϴ ϲϮϱϵϬϰϭ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϳϳϴ ϲϮϱϵϬϱϲ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϲ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϳϯϵ ϲϮϱϵϬϵϭ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϳ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϲϴ ϲϮϱϵϭϰϮ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϴ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϱϲ ϲϮϱϵϭϱϮ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϱϵ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϰϳ ϲϮϱϵϭϲϬ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϲϬ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϯϭ ϲϮϱϵϭϳϳ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн ϭ ^ƉŽƵƚƌĂŶĐŚ ϱͲϭϬ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ĞƉƚŚŽĨŚŽůůŽǁƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ ǁƉƚϭϲϭ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϭϲ ϲϮϱϵϭϴϮ t DĂƌƌŝ ϭϱͲϮϬ Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϲϮ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϲϭϮ ϲϮϱϵϭϴϭ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϲϯ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϴϳ ϲϮϱϵϮϬϵ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϲϰ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϳϲ ϲϮϱϵϮϮϬ t :ĂƌƌĂŚ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ ǁƉƚϭϲϱ ϱϬ, ϰϬϴϱϳϬ ϲϮϱϵϮϭϴ t DĂƌƌŝ ϮϬн Ϭ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ^ŝŐŶƐ EŽ MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

APPENDIX E

SIGNIFICANT SPECIES PROFILES

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Black-stripe Minnow Galaxiella nigrostriata

Status and Distribution: This species is classified as Priority 3 by DPaW. Allen et al. (2003) states that this species is common but restricted to wetlands within 100km of the coast in south Western Australia between Albany and Augusta with isolated populations known at Kemerton and Ellenbrook.

Habitat: Permanent or ephemeral pools, roadside ditches and small creeks in sandy, thickly vegetated wetland areas. Water is usually darkly tannin stained and acidic (pH 4.6 – 6.5) (Allen et al. 2003). Where present, the black-stripe Jminnow is widespread when water levels are high, but relies on a few summer refuge sites, where it survives in deep, cool pools and, when these dry out, retreats to water contained in the burrows of freshwater crayfish.

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Darling Range Heath Ctenotus Ctenotus delli

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 4 by DPaW. Main distribution is in the Darling Range from the Darlington/Mundaring area to near Collie (Storr et al 1999).

Habitat: Humid zone, mainly laterite and clays (Storr et al. 1999) supporting jarrah/marri woodland with a shrub dominated understorey, sheltering in dense vegetation, inside grass trees and beneath rocks, sometimes in burrows (Nevill 2005). Occasionally found on granite outcrops (Bush 2002).

Likely presence in subject site: Subject site is at the extreme southern limit of this species main documented range. Closest NatureMap records are of a single specimen collected in 1982. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Malleefowl Leipoa ocellata

Status and Distribution: This species is listed as Schedule 3 under the WC Act and as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act. Originally common, but now generally rare to uncommon and patchily distributed.

Current distribution mainly southern arid and semi-arid zones, north to Shark Bay, Jingemarra, Colga Downs and Yeelirrie, east to Earnest Giles Range, Yeo Lake, lower Ponton Creek and to Eucla and west and south to Cockleshell Gully, the Wongan Hills, Stirling Range, Beaufort Inlet, Hatters Hill, Mt Ragged and Point Malcolm (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Mainly scrubs and thickets of mallee Eucalyptus spp., boree Melaleuca lanceolata and bowgada Acacia linophylla, also dense litter forming shrublands. MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Likely presence in subject site: This species is regionally extinct and would never, under normal circumstances occur anywhere in this area. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Eastern Great Egret Ardea alba/Ardea modesta

Status and Distribution: This species is listed as Schedule 5 under the WC Act and as Migratory under the EPBC Act and under international agreements to which Australia is a signatory. The great egret is common and very widespread in any suitable permanent or temporary habitat (Morcombe 2004).

Habitat: Wetlands, flooded pasture, dams, estuarine mudflats, mangroves and reefs (Morcombe 2004).

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Cattle Egret Ardea ibis

Status and Distribution: This species is listed as Schedule 3 under the WC Act and as Migratory under the EPBC Act and under international agreements to which Australia is a signatory. The cattle egret is common in the north sections of its range but is an irregular visitor to the better watered parts of the state (Johnstone and Storr 1998). The population is expanding (Morcombe 2004).

Habitat: Moist pastures with tall grasses, shallow open wetlands and margins, mudflats (Morcombe 2004).

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Blue-billed Duck Oxyura australis

Status and Distribution: Recently listed as Priority 4 by DPaW (DPaW 2015). Rare to moderately common (most plentiful on the Swan Coastal Plain and in the Great Southern). South-western: north to Lake Pinjarrega and east to Esperance; vagrant further north and east (as far as Thundelarra and Kalgoorlie). Also south-eastern Australian and Tasmania (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Well vegetated freshwater swamps, large dams and lakes, winters on more open water (Morcombe 2004). Occasionally salt lakes and estuaries freshened by floodwaters (Johnstone and Storr 1998). MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No significant impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster

Status and Distribution: This species is listed as Migratory under the EPBC Act and under international agreements to which Australia is a signatory. White-bellied sea eagles are moderately common to common on Kimberley and Pilbara islands, coasts and estuaries, on Bernier, Dorre and Dirk Hartog Is., in Houtman Abrolhos and in the Archipelago of the Recherche; rare to uncommon elsewhere (Johnstone and Storr 1998). Also found in New Guinea, Indonesia, China, southeast Asia and India. Scarce near major coastal cities (Morcombe 2003).

Habitat: They nest and forage usually near the coast over islands, reefs, headlands, beaches, bays, estuaries, mangroves, but will also live near seasonally flooded inland swamps, lagoons and floodplains, often far inland on large pools of major rivers. Established pairs usually sedentary, immatures dispersive (Morcombe 2003). White- bellied Sea-Eagles build a large stick nest, which is used for many seasons in succession.

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No significant impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Osprey Pandion haliaetus

Status and Distribution: This species is listed as Schedule 3 under the WC Act and as Marine/Migratory under the EPBC Act and under international agreements to which Australia is a signatory. Moderately common to very common in sheltered seas around the north and west coast islands south to 31°S; uncommon to common on mainland coasts, estuaries and large rivers north of tropic, rare to uncommon elsewhere (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Coasts, estuaries, bays, inlets, islands, and surrounding waters, coral atolls, reefs, lagoons, rock cliffs and stacks. Ascends larger rivers (Pizzey & Knight 2012). Construct nests on prominent headland, large trees communication towers (Simpson and Day 2010).

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

Status and Distribution: This species is listed as Schedule 7 under the WC Act. Individuals of this species are uncommon/rare but wide ranging across Australia. MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Moderately common at higher levels of the Stirling Range, uncommon in hilly, north west Kimberley, Hamersley and Darling Ranges; rare or scarce elsewhere (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Diverse from rainforest to arid shrublands, from coastal heath to alpine (Morcombe 2004). Mainly about cliffs along coasts, rivers and ranges and about wooded watercourses and lakes (Johnstone and Storr 1998). The species utilises the ledges, cliff faces and large hollows/broken spouts of trees for nesting. It will also occasionally use the abandoned nests of other birds of prey.

Likely presence in subject site: Individuals of this species potentially utilise some sections of the subject site as part of a much larger home range but under these circumstance they would only occur rarely. Some potential for nesting in large open tree spouts, though no evidence of this observed during the field survey.

Potential impact of development: Potential for localised modification/loss of very small areas of possible habitat, but no significant impact considered likely.

Australasian Bittern Botaurus poiciloptilus

Status and Distribution: Classified as Schedule 1 under the WC Act and as Endangered under the EPBC Act (1999). The species is uncommon to rare (Morcombe 2004), but locally common in wetter parts of south west. Occurs north to Moora and east to Mt Arid (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Freshwater wetlands, occasionally estuarine; prefers heavy vegetation (Morcombe 2004) such as beds of tall dense Typha, Baumea and sedges in freshwater swamps (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Black Bittern Ixobrychus flavicollis

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 1 by DPaW. Occurs north to Yanchep and Northam and east to Albany (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Freshwater pools, swamps and lagoons, well screened with trees. Shelters in dense waterside vegetation (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Little Bittern Ixobrychus minutus

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 4 by DPaW. Occurs north to Moora and east to Two Peoples Bay; accidental or on migration further north and east and on Rottnest Island and central district (Condingup district) (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Dense vegetation surrounding/within freshwater pools, swamps and lagoons, well screened with trees. Shelters in dense beds of Typha, Baumea and tall rushes in freshwater swamps around lakes and along rivers (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Likely presence in subject site: No suitable habitat. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Forest Red-tailed Black Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus banksii naso

Status and Distribution: Listed as Scheduled 3 under the WC Act and as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act. Found in the humid and subhumid south west, mainly hilly interior, north to Gingin and east to Mt Helena, Christmas Tree Well, North Bannister, Mt Saddleback, Rock Gully and the upper King River (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Eucalypt forests, feeds on marri, jarrah, blackbutt, karri, sheoak and snottygobble. The forest red-tailed black cockatoo nests in the large hollows of marri, jarrah and karri (Johnstone and Kirkby 1999). In marri, the nest hollows of the forest red-tailed black cockatoo range from 8-14m above ground, the entrance is 12 – 41cm in diameter and the depth is one to five metres (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Breeding commences in winter/spring. There are few records of breeding in the forest red-tailed black cockatoo (Johnstone and Storr 1998), but eggs are laid in October and November (Johnstone 1997; Johnstone and Storr 1998). Recent data however indicates that breeding in all months of the year occurs with peaks in spring and autumn–winter (Ron Johnstone pers comms). Incubation period 29 – 31 days. Young fledge at 8 to 9 weeks (Simpson and Day 2010).

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Period in which breeding is most J likely to commence Period in which fledging/weening

could extend through

Likely presence in subject site: Foraging evidence attributed to this species was observed during the field survey (chewed marri fruits). Some vegetation present within the subject site represents foraging habitat for this species (e.g. marri trees, jarrah trees) and using DotE criteria the area also contains potential breeding habitat (i.e. any suitable tree species with a DBH >50cm) though no actual breeding evidence was found. May also roost on site though no evidence of this was seen. MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Potential impact of development: Potential for localised loss of small areas of possible habitat, but no significant impact considered likely.

Baudin’s Black-Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus baudinii

Status and Distribution: Listed as Scheduled 2 under the WC Act and as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act. Confined to the south-west of Western Australia, north to Gidgegannup, east to Mt Helena, Wandering, Quindanning, Kojonup, Frankland and King River and west to the eastern strip of the Swan Coastal Plain including West Midland, Byford, Nth Dandalup, Yarloop, Wokalup and Bunbury (Johnstone and Storr 1998). On the southern Swan Coastal Plain this cockatoo is in some areas resident but mainly a migrant moving from the deep south-west to the central and northern Darling Range. Between March and September most flocks move north and are concentrated in the northern parts of the Darling Range. During this period birds forage well out onto the southern Swan Coastal Plain to areas such as Harvey, Myalup, Bunbury, Capel, Dunsborough and Meelup. While generally more common in the Darling Range this species can also be common on parts of the southern Swan Coastal Plain especially in mid-August – September when flocks begin to return to their breeding quarters (Johnstone 2008).

Habitat: Mainly eucalypt forests where it feeds primarily on the marri seeds, (Morcombe 2004), Banksia, Hakea and Erodium sp. Also strips bark from trees in search of beetle larvae (Johnstone and Storr 1998). This species of cockatoo nests in large tree hollows, 30–40 cm in diameter and more than 30 cm deep (Saunders 1974).

Baudin's black-cockatoo breeds in late winter and spring, from August to November or December (Gould 1972; Johnstone 1997; Saunders 1974; Saunders et al. 1985). Eggs laid in October (Johnstone and Storr 1998). Based on observations at currently known nest sites breeding mainly occurs within the October-December period (Ron Johnstone pers comms). Incubation is 28 – 30 days. Young fledge at 8 to 9 weeks (Simpson and Day 2010).

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Period in which breeding is J most likely to commence Period in which fledging/weening could extend through

Likely presence in subject site: Foraging evidence attributed to this species was observed during the field survey (chewed marri fruits). Some vegetation present within the subject site represents foraging habitat for this species (e.g. marri trees, jarrah trees) and using DotE criteria the area also contains potential breeding habitat (i.e. any suitable tree species with a DBH >50cm) though no actual breeding evidence was found. May also roost on site though no evidence of this was seen. MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Potential impact of development: Potential for localised loss of small areas of possible habitat, but no significant impact considered likely.

Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus latirostris

Status and Distribution: Carnaby’s black cockatoo is listed as Scheduled 2 under the WC Act and as Endangered under the EPBC Act. Confined to the south-west of Western Australia, north to the lower Murchison River and east to Nabawa, Wilroy, Waddi Forest, Nugadong, Manmanning, Durokoppin, Noongar (Moorine Rock), Lake Cronin, Ravensthorpe Range, head of Oldfield River, 20 km ESE of Condingup and Cape Arid; also casual on Rottnest Island (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Forests, woodlands, heathlands, farms; feeds on Banksia, Hakea and Marri. Carnaby’s Cockatoo has specific nesting site requirements. Nests are mostly in smoothed-barked eucalypts with the nest hollows ranging from 2.5 to 12m above the ground, an entrance from 23-30cm diameter and a depth of 0.1-2.5m (Johnstone and Storr, 1998).

Breeding occurs in winter/spring mainly in eastern forest and wheatbelt where they can find mature hollow bearing trees to nest in (Morcombe 2004). Judging from records in the Storr-Johnstone Bird Data Bank, this species is currently expanding its breeding range westward and south into the Jarrah – Marri forest of the Darling Scarp and into the Tuart forests of the Swan Coastal Plain including the region between Mandurah and Bunbury. Carnaby’s Black Cockatoo has been known to breed close to the town of Mandurah, as well as at Dawesville, Lake Clifton and Baldivis (pers. comm., Ron Johnstone, WA Museum) and there are small resident populations on the southern Swan Coastal Plain near Mandurah, Lake Clifton and near Bunbury. At each of these sites the birds forage in remnant vegetation and adjacent pine plantations (Johnstone 2008).

Carnaby's Black-Cockatoo lays eggs from July or August to October or November, with most clutches being laid in August and September (Saunders 1986). Birds in inland regions may begin laying up to three weeks earlier than those in coastal areas (Saunders 1977). The female incubates the eggs over a period of 28-29 days. The young depart the nest 10–12 weeks after hatching (Saunders 1977; Smith & Saunders 1986).

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Period in which breeding is J most likely to commence Period in which fledging/weening could extend through

Likely presence in subject site: Foraging evidence attributed to this species was observed during the field survey (chewed pine cones). Some vegetation present within MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1 the subject site represents foraging habitat for this species (e.g. marri trees, jarrah trees) and using DotE criteria the area also contains potential breeding habitat (i.e. any suitable tree species with a DBH >50cm) though no actual breeding evidence was found. May also roost on site though no evidence of this was seen.

Potential impact of development: Potential for localised loss of small areas of possible habitat, but no significant impact considered likely.

Barking Owl Ninox connivens connivens

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 2 by DPaW. Found north to Perth (formerly) and east to Northam, Katanning and nearly to Bremer Bay. Declining in south west (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Dense vegetation, especially forest and thickets of waterside vegetation such as melaleucas (Johnstone and Storr 1998). Roosts in tree hollows.

Likely presence in subject site: This species preferred habitat is absent from the subject site. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Masked Owl Tyto novaehollandae novaehollandae

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 3 by DPaW. Found north to Yanchep and east to Yealering, Gnowangerup and Albany, casual further north. Locally common in south west but generally uncommon (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Habitat: Roosts and nests in heavy forest, hunts over open woodlands and farmlands (Morcombe 2004). Probably breeding in forested deep south west with some autumn– winter wanderings northwards (Johnstone and Storr 1998).

Likely presence in subject site: Status in the general area is difficult to determine. May utilise forest and woodland areas within and near the subject site for roosting and therefore may forage in more open areas. Probably only present rarely.

Potential impact of development: Potential for localised loss/modification of very small areas of possible habitat, but no significant impact considered likely.

Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus

Status and Distribution: The fork-tailed swift is listed as Schedule 5 under the WC Act and as migratory under the EPBC Act as migratory under the EPBC Act 1999 and under international agreements to which Australia is a signatory. It is a summer migrant (Oct-Apr) to Australia (Morcombe 2004).

Habitat: Low to very high airspace over varied habitat from rainforest to semi desert (Morcombe 2004). MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Likely presence in subject site: Very uncommon in south west and rarely utilises terrestrial habitats (i.e. almost entirely aerial). May occur very occasionally but not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat is considered likely.

Rainbow Bee-eater Merops ornatus

Status and Distribution: This species is listed as Schedule 5 under the WC Act and as migratory under the EPBC Act and under international agreements to which Australia is a signatory. The Rainbow Bee-eater is a common summer migrant to southern Australia but in the north they are resident (Morcombe 2004).

Habitat: Open Country, of woodlands, open forest, semi arid scrub, grasslands, clearings in heavier forest, farmlands (Morcombe 2004). Breeds underground in areas of suitable soft soil firm enough to support tunnel building.

Likely presence in subject site: Most vegetation appears unsuitable for this species to utilise given its relatively high density. May occasionally occur in more open, disturbed areas. Ground conditions unsuitable for breeding

Potential impact of development: Potential for localised loss/modification of very small areas of possible habitat, but no significant impact considered likely.

Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea

Status and Distribution: The grey wagtail is listed as Schedule 5 under the WC Act and as Migratory under the EPBC Act including international agreements to which Australia is a signatory. A rarely recorded, accidental vagrant that has on a few occasions been recorded on widely separated parts of the Australian coastline (Pizzey & Knight 2012).

Habitat: In Australia, near running water in disused quarries, sandy, rocky streams in escarpments and rainforest, sewerage ponds, ploughed fields and airfields (Pizzey & Knight 2012).

Likely presence in subject site: This species preferred habitat is absent from the subject site. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Chuditch Dasyurus geoffroii

Status and Distribution: Listed as Scheduled 3 under the WC Act and as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act. Formerly occurred over nearly 70 per cent of Australia. The chuditch now has a patchy distribution throughout the Jarrah forest and mixed karri/marri/jarrah forest of southwest Western Australia. Also occurs in very low numbers in the Midwest, Wheatbelt and South Coast Regions with records from Moora to the north, Yellowdine to the east and south to Hopetoun (DEC 2012). MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Habitat: Chuditch use a range of habitats including forest, mallee shrublands, woodland and desert. The densest populations have been found in riparian jarrah forest. Chuditch require adequate numbers of suitable den and refuge sites (horizontal hollow logs or earth burrows) and sufficient prey biomass (large invertebrates, reptiles and small mammals) to survive. They are capable of travelling long distances and have large home ranges, and even at their most abundant, chuditch are generally present in low numbers. For this reason, they require habitats that are of a suitable size and not excessively fragmented (DPaW 2012). The estimated home range of a male chuditch is over 15 km2 whilst that for females is 3-4 km2 (Sorena and Soderquist 1995).

Likely presence in subject site: Current status in the area is difficult to determine. NatureMap (DpaW 2016) shows a number of scattered records in the general area. Given the species preference for a large home range, the subject sites small size and the degraded state of most of the habitat present only occasional transient individuals are considered likely to occur.

Potential impact of development: Loss of small areas of mostly degraded/marginal habitat and therefore impacts are unlikely to alter the species overall status in the wider area given the huge extent of similar and better quality habitat nearby.

Numbat Myrmecobius fasciatus

Status and Distribution: Listed as Scheduled 3 under the WC Act (1950) and as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act (1999). Once occurred across much of arid and semi arid southern Australia, now restricted to a few remnant forests of Wandoo, Powderbark Wandoo or jarrah in South west WA (Menkhorst & Knight 2001). Rare, scattered. Found only at Dryandra, Perup and six other translocation sites (Van Dyck & Strahan 2008).

Habitat: Generally dominated by eucalypts that provide hollow logs and branches for shelter and termites for food (Van Dyck & Strahan 2008).

Likely presence in subject site: The current status in the area is uncertain. No evidence of this species was observed during the field survey and NatureMap (DPaW 2016) shows only very sparse records for the general area, the closest being from 2006. Most of the vegetation present within the subject site does not represent habitat suitable for this species to utilise. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Southern Brush-tailed Phascogale Phascogale tapoatafa ssp.

Status and Distribution: Listed as Scheduled 3 under the WC Act. Present distribution is believed to have been reduced to approximately 50 per cent of its former range. Now known from Perth and south to Albany, west of Albany Highway. Occurs at low densities in the northern jarrah forest. Highest densities occur in the Perup/Kingston area, Collie River valley, and near Margaret River and Busselton (DPaW information pamphlet). Records are less common from wetter forests. MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Habitat: This subspecies has been observed in dry sclerophyll forests and open woodlands that contain hollow-bearing trees but a sparse ground cover. A nocturnal carnivore relying on tree hollows as nest sites. The home range for a female Brush- tailed Phascogale is estimated at between 20 and 70 ha, whilst that for males is given as twice that of females. In addition, they tend to utilise a large number (approximately 20) of different nest sites throughout their range (Soderquist 1995).

Likely presence in subject site: Current status in the area is difficult to determine. NatureMap (DpaW 2016) shows a small number of scattered records in the general area. Given the species preference for a large home range, the subject sites small size and the degraded state of most of the habitat present the area is only likely to support only one or two indivduals at most.

Potential impact of development: Loss of small areas of mostly degraded/marginal habitat and therefore impacts are unlikely to alter the species overall status in the wider area given the huge extent of similar and better quality habitat nearby.

Southern Brown Bandicoot (Quenda) Isoodon obesulus fusciventer

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 4 by DPaW. Widely distributed in the south west from near Cervantes north of Perth to east of Esperance, patchy distribution through the jarrah and karri forest and on the Swan Coastal Plain, and inland as far as Hyden. Has been translocated to Julimar State Forest, Hills Forest Mundaring, Tutanning Nature Reserve, Boyagin Nature Reserve, Dongolocking Nature Reserve, Leschenault Conservation Park, and Karakamia and Paruna Sanctuaries and Nambung National Park (DPaW information pamphlet).

Habitat: Dense scrubby, often swampy, vegetation with dense cover up to one metre high, often feeds in adjacent forest and woodland that is burnt on a regular basis and in areas of pasture and cropland lying close to dense cover. Populations inhabiting jarrah and wandoo forests are usually associated with watercourses. Quendas can thrive in more open habitat subject to exotic predator control (DPaW information pamphlet).

Likely presence in subject site: Current status in the area is difficult to determine. NatureMap (DpaW 2016) shows a small number of scattered records in the general area. Most of the subject site does not represent suitable habitat for this species given the absence of dense ground cover. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Bilby Macrotis lagotis

Status and Distribution: The Bilby is listed as Schedule 3 under the WC Act and as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act. Current distribution in suitable habitat from Tanami Desert west to near Broome and south to Warburton. Former distribution extended south to Margaret River, though apparently absent from the coastal plain (Burbidge 2004). MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Habitat: Current habitat included Acacia shrublands, spinifex and hummock grassland (Menkhorst et al. 2011).

Likely presence in subject site: Regionally extinct.

Potential impacts: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will ocurr.

Western Ringtail Possum Pseudocheirus occidentalis

Status and Distribution: Listed as Scheduled 2 under the WC Act and as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act. Common in suitable habitat (de Tores 2008). The highest densities of this species are recorded in peppermint habitat near Busselton area; relatively high densities are found in jarrah/marri forest at Perup (de Tores 2008).

The western ringtail possum has a restricted distribution in south-western Western Australia. Most known populations (natural and translocated) are now restricted to near coastal areas of the south west from the Dawesville area to the Waychinicup National Park. Inland, it is also known to be relatively common in a small part of the lower Collie River valley, the Perup Nature Reserve and surrounding forest blocks near Manjimup.

The western ringtail was formerly more widespread: in the 1970s it was known from Casuarina woodlands in the wheatbelt near Pingelly (south-east of Perth), and it is thought to have once occurred throughout much of south-western Western Australia (but not necessarily continuously distributed) (Maxwell et al. 1996; de Tores 2008).

Habitat: The western ringtail possum was once located in a variety of habitats including coastal peppermint, coastal peppermint-tuart, jarrah-marri associations, sheoak woodland, and eucalypt woodland and mallee. Coastal populations mostly inhabit peppermint-tuart associations with highest densities in habitats with dense, relatively lush vegetation. In these areas the main determinants of suitable habitat for WRPs appears to be the presence of Agonis flexuosa either as the dominant tree or as an understorey component of Eucalypt forest or woodland (Jones et al. 1994).

Inland, the largest known populations occur in the Upper Warren area east of Manjimup (Wayne et al. 2005). In this area the peppermint tree is naturally absent and jarrah- marri associations constitute the species refuge and foraging habitat. In these areas, where peppermint is scarce or absent, the species appears to primarily feed on Nuytsia floribunda, sheoak (Allocasuarina fraseriana), young jarrah and marri (including young shoots, flowers and ripening fruits)(G. Harewood per. obs.). This species also utilises pine forests but to what degree is unknown (G. Harewood per. obs.).

Utilises tree hollows when present and available but also builds “dreys” for daytime refuge where vegetation structure permits.

Likely presence in subject site: The current status in the area is uncertain. No evidence of this species was observed during the field survey and NatureMap (DPaW 2016) shows only very sparse records for the general area. Most of the vegetation present within the subject site does not represent habitat suitable for this species to utilise. Not listed as a potential species. MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Quokka Setonix brachyurus

Status and Distribution: Listed as Scheduled 3 under the WC Act and as Vulnerable under the EPBC Act. Rare and restricted in south west W.A. from south of Perth to Two Peoples Bay. The distribution of the Quokka includes Rottnest and Bald Islands, and at least 25 known sites on the mainland, including Two Peoples Bay Nature Reserve, Torndirrup National Park, Mt Manypeaks National Park, Walpole-Nornalup National Park, and various swamp areas through the south-west forests from Jarrahdale to Walpole.

Habitat: Mainland populations of this species are currently restricted to densely vegetated coastal heaths, swamps, riverine habitats including tea-tree thickets on sandy soils along creek systems where they are less vulnerable to predation. The species is nocturnal.

Likely presence in subject site: This species preferred habitat is absent from the subject site. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Western Brush Wallaby Macropus irma

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 4 by DPaW. The western brush wallaby is distributed across the south-west of Western Australia from north of Kalbarri to Cape Arid (DPaW information pamphlet).

Habitat: The species optimum habitat is open forest or woodland, particularly favouring open, seasonally wet flats with low grasses and open scrubby thickets. It is also found in some larger areas of mallee and heathland in the wheatbelt. It is uncommon in wet sclerophyll forest and absent from true karri forest that have dense undergrowth (Van Dyck & Strahan 2008).

Likely presence in subject site: Current status in the area is difficult to determine. NatureMap (DpaW 2016) shows a small number of scattered records in the general area. Most of the subject site does not represent suitable habitat for this species. May occur very occasionally but not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur.

Western False Pipistrelle Falsistrellus mackenziei

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 4 by DPaW and as Near Threatened by the ICUN. Confined to south west W.A. south of Perth and east to the wheat belt. Most records from karri forests but also recorded in wetter stands of jarrah and tuart and MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1 woodlands on the Swan Coastal Plain (Menkhorst and Knight 2011). Range appears to be contracting southwards, presumably due to drying climate.

Habitat: Typically these bats are found in wet sclerophyll forest dominated by karri and in high rainfall zones of the jarrah and marri forest. They have also been recorded in mixed drier sclerophyll tuart-jarrah tall woodlands on the southern Swan Coastal Plain. Marri, sheoak and peppermint trees are often co-dominant at their collection localities. The species roosts in small colonies in tree hollows, branches and stumps (Churchill 2008). Forages at canopy level and in the larger gaps between trees.

Likely presence in subject site: There are very few records of this species in the immediate vicinity but it may utilise the subject site for foraging and possibly roosting.

Potential impact of development: Loss of small areas of potential habitat but impacts are unlikely to alter the species overall status in the wider area given the huge extent of similar habitat nearby.

Water Rat Hydromys chrysogaster

Status and Distribution: Listed as Priority 4 by DPaW. The water rat is widely distributed around Australia and its offshore islands, New Guinea and some adjacent islands. It occurs in fresh to brackish water habitats in the south-west of Western Australia, but occurs in marine environments along the Pilbara coastline and offshore islands. Previous survey work in the south west suggested this species was relatively common and widespread though difficult to capture (Christensen et al. 1985, How et al. 1987).

Habitat: The water rat occupies habitat in the vicinity of permanent water, fresh, brackish or marine. Likely to occur in all major rivers and most of the larger streams as well as bodies of permanent water in the lower south west (Christensen et al. 1985).

Likely presence in subject site: This species preferred habitat is absent from the subject site. Not listed as a potential species.

Potential impact of development: No impact on this species or its preferred habitat will occur. MRWA – SOUTH WEST HIGHWAY - SLK 219.345 – 220.900 - FAUNA ASSESSMENT – SEPTEMBER – V1

DISCLAIMER

This fauna assessment report (“the report”) has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract, or as otherwise agreed, between the Client and Greg Harewood (“the Author”). In some circumstances the scope of services may have been limited by a range of factors such as time, budget, access and/or site disturbance constraints. In accordance with the scope of services, the Author has relied upon the data and has conducted environmental field monitoring and/or testing in the preparation of the report. The nature and extent of monitoring and/or testing conducted is described in the report.

The conclusions are based upon field data and the environmental monitoring and/or testing carried out over a limited period of time and are therefore merely indicative of the environmental condition of the site at the time of preparing the report. Also it should be recognised that site conditions, can change with time.

Within the limitations imposed by the scope of services, the field assessment and preparation of this report have been undertaken and performed in a professional manner, in accordance with generally accepted practices and using a degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by reputable environmental consultants under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

In preparing the report, the Author has relied upon data, surveys, analyses, designs, plans and other information provided by the Client and other individuals and organisations, most of which are referred to in the report (“the data”). Except as otherwise stated in the report, the Author has not verified the accuracy of completeness of the data. To the extent that the statements, opinions, facts, information, conclusions and/or recommendations in the report (“conclusions”) are based in whole or part on the data, those conclusions are contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of the data. The Author will not be liable in relation to incorrect conclusions should any data, information or condition be incorrect or have been concealed, withheld, misrepresented or otherwise not fully disclosed to the Author.

The report has been prepared for the benefit of the Client and no other party. The Author assumes no responsibility and will not be liable to any other person or organisation for or in relation to any matter dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report, or for any loss or damage suffered by any other person or organisation arising from matters dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report (including without limitation matters arising from any negligent act or omission of the Author or for any loss or damage suffered by any other party relying upon the matters dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report). Other parties should not rely upon the report or the accuracy or completeness of any conclusions and should make their own enquiries and obtain independent advice in relation to such matters.

The Author will not be liable to update or revise the report to take into account any events or emergent circumstances or facts occurring or becoming apparent after the date of the report.