DOCSLIB.ORG

Id 174 542 Institution Pub Data Available Ffcm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT MESONS ID 174 542 SO 011 883 AUTHOR Harrell, Mary Ann Court in TITLE Equal Justice Under Law: The Supreme American Life. INSTITUTION Foundation of the Federal BarAssociation Washington, D.C. PUB DATA 75 NOTE 151p. AVAILABLE FFCM Foundation of the Federal BarAssociation, 1815 H Street, N.W. ,Washington, D.C. 20006 ($2.50) EDFS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC hot Availablefrom EDRS. DESCRIFICPS Constitutional History; *Constitutional Law;Court Doctrine; *Court Role; *Federal Courts;Federal Government; Government Role; Justice;Legal Problems; Secondary Education; *Supreme CourtLitigation; *United States History IDENTIFIERS *Supreme Court; United StatesConstitution ABSTRACT The document descrites theestablishment, development, procedures, and some landmark casescf the U.S. Supreme Court. The objective is to explorethe history cf the court and tc explain its role in the American systemof government. The booklet is presented in fcut chapters. Thefirst chapter, entitled "A Heritage of Law," offers judicialbackground from the 1606 VirginiaCharter tc the Constitution and Bill ofRights. The seccrd chapter, whichforrs the valor part of the document,is entitled "Eecisiors for Liberty." It traces the court's growth of scopethrough precedent-setting decisions sigh as Chisholm v. Georgiain 1793, Marbury v.Madison in 18C3, McCulloch v. Maryland in1819, Gibbors v. Ogden in 1824, Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857, Munn v.Illinois in 1877, Northern Securities v. United States in 1904,Adkins v. Children's Hospital in 1923, Brown v. Board of Educationin 1951, Gidecn v. Wainwright in 1963, and Roe v. Wade in 1973.Chief Justices and events are described historically in connectionwits the cases, from John Jay to Warren Burger, as the court's power asinterpreter of the Constitution grew. The third chapterdiscusses court procedures, staff dut-ies, the building, and theduties of the justices. Chapter IV offers a brief descriptionof the powers and limitationsof the federal court system, including contemporaryreforms and technical innovations. Ar index concludes thetookle'. (CK) 444*************************************4****************************** Fenroductions supplied by EDP P.re the best that canbe made from the original docomert. 1$1,41030**30#***#.41#20******************************************************* EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW THE SUPREME COURT IN AMERICAN LIFE By MARY ANN HARRELL National Geographic Staff "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. MATERIAL IN MICROFICHEONLY EDUCATION &WELFARE HAS BEEN GRANTED BY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OP EDUCATION 4;-Lri THIS DOCUMENT HASSEEN REPRO- DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVEDFROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION *TING IT POINTS OF VIEWOR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRE- TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES SENT orro-cAL NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY INFORMATION CENTER(ERIC)." THE FOUNDATION OF THE FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION with the cooperation of the National Geographic Society WASHINGTON. D. C. Copyright © 1965, 1975 by THE FOUNDATION OF THE FED- ERAL BAR ASSOCIATION. a nonprofit educationalfoundation chartered, %, Congress on August 24, 1954. Headquarters: 904 Feder., Nan Building. Washington, D. C. 20006 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Earl W. Kintner President William L. Ellis Vice President Marshall C. Gardner Secretary Bettin Stalling Treasurer Frederick R. Franklin Historian Warren E. Burger. Henry A. Dudley. Scott Hodes. Conrad D. Philos. C. Normand Poirier. Bernard G. Segal. Paul E. Treusch Advisers: Ralph E. Becker. Lawrence R. Caru- so. Charles Fahy, Paul H. Gantt. John H. Grosvenor. A. S. Harzenstein. Gilbert Jaco- bus. Thomas D. Lambros, Alfred P. Murrah. George S.Prugh, Jr..Marguerite Rawalt, Joseph F. Spaniol. Jr.. F. Trowbridge vom Baur. Counsel: Kenneth H. Liles sokiranY smutbelow the American eagle distinguishes the Seal of the Produced as a public service Supreme Court of the United States. by the National Geographic Society Justices ordered the emblem at their Melvin M. Payne President Melville Bell Grosvenor Editor-in-Chief third meeting, on February 3, 1790. Its designers adapted the Great Seal Prepared by the Special Publications Division of the United States, adding the star STAFF FOR THIS BOOK W s y m b o l l t e t h e Constitution's grant Melvin NI. Payne Editorial Director of judicial power to "one Supreme Editor Robert L. Breeden Court." The Clerk of the Court Donald J. Crump Associate Editor Philip B. Silcott Senior Editor affixes the Seal to official papers EDITORIAL STAFF: Jules B. Billard. Bruce Brander. judgments, mandates, and wets. Abigail T. Brett. Thomas Canby. Jr.. Dorothy Corson. Barbara Coulter. Richard M. Crum. Johanna G. Far- ren, Barbara J. Hall. Carolyn Matt. GeraldineLinder. Margaret C. Shaw. 0. Mac White. Peggy D. Winston STAFF FOR THIRD EDITION: Merrill Windsor.Manag- ing Editor; David R. Bridge. Picture Editor; Jane D'Alelio. Design; Susan Burns. Research; Mary G. CONTENTS Burns. Jane H. Buxton. Stephanie S. Cooke. Marta Isabel Coons. Suzanne J. Jacobson. Marilyn L. Wilbur. Linda M. Yee. Staff Assistants Foreword S PRODUCTION AND PRINTING: Robert W. Messer.Pro- duction Manager; George V. White. Assistant Pro- duction Manager; Raja D. Murshed. Nancy W. Glaser. 6 June 1.. Graham, Production Assistants: John R. A Heritage of Law Metcaffe, James R. Whitney. Engraving and Printing Third Edition Decisions for Liberty 15 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 74-15417 OVERLEAP: James Earle Fraser's "Contemplationof Justice" sits brooding before the main west entrance Within the Court Today 115 Of the Court. ENDPAPERS: One hundred Justices have served on the The Federal Court System 144 Supreme Court since its birth in 1790. The rows of pictures running horizontally present the jurists, with terms of service, in the order of taking the oath. Aster- Index 15',) isks indicate the 15 Chief Justices. John Rutledge was named Chief Justice by a recess appointment in 1 795 and served briefly, but the Senate 'ejected him when it reconvened. OVIV1.1141/, SOUPS I CM11,110al N I f 130.111M V1.101,04111110041 0000 IS. 11.01.41110f COMM. CO,WIlle Foreword REVERED AND ABUSEDasnoother We hope this story of the Court will be court has ever been, least known of part of that debate, which began almost as the great institutions of the United soon as the Justices started hearing cases. States, the Supreme Court holds a unique Although we believe lawyers will enjoy it, power in the American system of govern- itis not written especially for them. and ment----a unique place in the American story. legal technicalities are not its theme. To tell that story and to explain that pow- The theme is a national adventure. Its er. the Foundation of the Federal Bar As- episodes are crises and struggles and con- sociation is publishing this book. flicts. Its setting is a continent and beyond George Washington said that "the due and a few small rooms. administration of justice is the firmest pillar To present this story, Dr. Melville Bell of good Government." The Foundation Grosvenor, Editor-in-Chief, and Dr. Mel- works to improve that administration, par- vin M. Payne, President, have generously ticularly in the federal courts. It acts,for shared the resources of the National Geo- the Federal Bar Association, whose 13,600 graphic Society with the Foundation; and members have served or now serve as attor- we are happy to thank them for their help. neys or judges for the national government. In this project, they and their staff col- Believing that each citizen must be the leagues have performed a great service to final judge of good government, it has the Nation. planned this book to serve the public. Members of our Foundation have selected When the First Congress was debating a landmark cases and reviewed both text and bill to establish a federal court system, one pictures which follow. The Foundation as- Representative from New Hampshire ex- sumes full responsibility for the contents of pected it to "give great disgust." He could the volume, which we are proud to sponsor. see no reason for a national judiciary, "un- With publication of thisedition,the lessit be to plague mankind." His fears Foundation welcomes a new organization have not materialized. Today this system that has joined us in encouraging public has begun an unprecedented effort at self- interest in the Court: The Supreme Court improvement and innovation: and this book Historical Society, whose specific purpose includes a report on that program of change. is to preserve and extend knowledge and Most people never enter the federalappreciation of the history of the Court courts, either as parties to a lawsuit or and the Nation's judicial system. members of a jurynot even as spectators. For everyone who has worked on this They think of the courts as strange and re- book and for everyone who reads it. we mote if they think of them at all. And they hope it will mean a new devotion to the believe, with some validity, that the law is a ideals of the Constitution, to the purposes hramble patch of technicalities and strange which have been the special trust of the iords. They might reasonably expe 'T tht'f Supreme Court"to form a more perfect Supreme Court to be the most remote olitlt. Union, establish Justice ... and secure the far from =everyday affairs. And yet it is not; Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our it is "supreme." but still very close to the Posterity." And we hope it will mean a new lives and activities of all Americans. pride in law as our way of using freedom. From day to day the headlines announce its decisions, the editorials praise and de- EARL W. KINTNER nounce them. and citizens wrangle about President. The Foundati,,n them in law schools and living rooms. of the Federal Bar Association 5 of the English tradition. But no English judge can say from the bench, as an American judge may say: "The law on thebooks says thus-and- so; but in spite of the fact that the legislature passedit in due form, this law is voidit is unconstitutional and therefore no law at all." The English constitution has remained unwritten; it was, and still is, a mass of precedents, and of rules drawn from them.
Recommended publications
  • Early Understandings of the "Judicial Power" in Statutory Interpretation

    Early Understandings of the "Judicial Power" in Statutory Interpretation

    ARTICLE ALL ABOUT WORDS: EARLY UNDERSTANDINGS OF THE 'JUDICIAL POWER" IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION, 1776-1806 William N. Eskridge, Jr.* What understandingof the 'judicial Power" would the Founders and their immediate successors possess in regard to statutory interpretation? In this Article, ProfessorEskridge explores the background understandingof the judiciary's role in the interpretationof legislative texts, and answers earlier work by scholars like ProfessorJohn Manning who have suggested that the separation of powers adopted in the U.S. Constitution mandate an interpre- tive methodology similar to today's textualism. Reviewing sources such as English precedents, early state court practices, ratifying debates, and the Marshall Court's practices, Eskridge demonstrates that while early statutory interpretationbegan with the words of the text, it by no means confined its searchfor meaning to the plain text. He concludes that the early practices, especially the methodology ofJohn Marshall,provide a powerful model, not of an anticipatory textualism, but rather of a sophisticated methodology that knit together text, context, purpose, and democratic and constitutionalnorms in the service of carrying out the judiciary's constitutional role. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................... 991 I. Three Nontextualist Powers Assumed by English Judges, 1500-1800 ............................................... 998 A. The Ameliorative Power .............................. 999 B. Suppletive Power (and More on the Ameliorative Pow er) .............................................. 1003 C. Voidance Power ..................................... 1005 II. Statutory Interpretation During the Founding Period, 1776-1791 ............................................... 1009 * John A. Garver Professor ofJurisprudence, Yale Law School. I am indebted toJohn Manning for sharing his thoughts about the founding and consolidating periods; although we interpret the materials differently, I have learned a lot from his research and arguments.
  • Two Cheers for Judicial Restraint: Justice White and the Role of the Supreme Court Justice White and the Exercise of Judicial Power

    Two Cheers for Judicial Restraint: Justice White and the Role of the Supreme Court Justice White and the Exercise of Judicial Power

    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2003 Two Cheers for Judicial Restraint: Justice White and the Role of the Supreme Court Justice White and the Exercise of Judicial Power Dennis J. Hutchinson Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Dennis J. Hutchinson, "Two Cheers for Judicial Restraint: Justice White and the Role of the Supreme Court Justice White and the Exercise of Judicial Power," 74 University of Colorado Law Review 1409 (2003). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWO CHEERS FOR JUDICIAL RESTRAINT: JUSTICE WHITE AND THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT DENNIS J. HUTCHINSON* The death of a Supreme Court Justice prompts an account- ing of his legacy. Although Byron R. White was both widely admired and deeply reviled during his thirty-one-year career on the Supreme Court of the United States, his death almost a year ago inspired a remarkable reconciliation among many of his critics, and many sounded an identical theme: Justice White was a model of judicial restraint-the judge who knew his place in the constitutional scheme of things, a jurist who fa- cilitated, and was reluctant to override, the policy judgments made by democratically accountable branches of government. The editorial page of the Washington Post, a frequent critic during his lifetime, made peace post-mortem and celebrated his vision of judicial restraint.' Stuart Taylor, another frequent critic, celebrated White as the "last true believer in judicial re- straint."2 Judge David M.
  • Caqe ,T-)65 61

    Caqe ,T-)65 61

    eiF C714rd FF27JAIKL,ti Ckw.i,ZSI CAqE ,t-)65_61,. ;bo'7qra TAE C3h11© I-SuPRLrnE COi.I fF,a,qRh aF- CoFnmi SSiWER.SI 1N fvE: LE VEF2T K. PdE3221't2^. AKC^N.d^l ^f^r's^'L., t.^SES. A- LLCyt:LSTiN P. oSUEL^Sa7.ReGA(a.OGi 115% 511 M.MArN ST ./LMZc^ni.e^l1 4431U< .4AOa.... pE^,' 0 6 Z006 LAWREIJGE R. Sin^TiJ.FS©.,REG.NO.a©2902Es1 ONE CflSCA6E PLZ.. 7t1(.FL..AKR-dN.ON 44 3ej8, MARCIA J NIENGEL, CLERI( AEFTS.,APLEES..RES.... SUPREME CUF;! OF ILELATQiZ.AP('ELLAnfT, PLAu.ITiF'F LEVErc'l` K,C►RIPFrn! MOi IGaI FdR r-N7RY FdOR ALLEGE LdA1rQI.ITN6kI ZE P'cAcT 1 CE aF LAW L6t^^EN AGAwsT ZnTF1 A'T'f'oRAfEYs Lf1ldYER lA1LAPTlOAIEN As AL3ouE SEE NEraLE EXNIL3rT#'^"^4 "C° &IbuS CvMES,RELATafZ.ArPELLqM.PLAinitrFF LEUERT nc.6RIF'FiN.NE(mF3Y PRRY PbfZ RELIEF LLPOni'Ta WlliG.N RELIER CAnr BE GPtAn[TEd. A.rnaTrer.t FrafR Eti1TRY FoR ALLEGE dnrr4uTW0rtraE PreACTrcE aF LAru IoOisEO Afvr^,E6-ra ArTaRuEYs LAwyER. ^nsCA.PTranrE& AS AbevsE_ .SEC r(s,ucE cxAI PEr.li,rmL. L>APPE.FlL As QF R1a13T z^TRFanI Smi?R'Fa L eF RS.Car'.h LEVESZ~1 SOaw Cl-,..uSE- dRDE2 FOp^ REL)Ar11b, MmANf]E& TA)C f'fLEE AT ALL COS*P `TAlS RZEqmCLE5r wER Ciau F3AR rL, U rs 6lFl, PEnrtvAjG AISTddtC A7rVE REL/EF C,u P. RL. 55(a1^6) t*'s4,uERN WJLUE' 7)IE Au7'F1.. SctP CT RL. P"h.'00 , iti{E rgAl2cFoAln RL,$L.LIh^A^t^^JGR^ZEb PrZALT^CECK LAC^/.
  • Justice Under Law William F

    Justice Under Law William F

    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Popular Media Faculty and Deans 1977 Justice Under Law William F. Swindler William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Swindler, William F., "Justice Under Law" (1977). Popular Media. 264. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/popular_media/264 Copyright c 1977 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/popular_media INL Chief Justice John Marshall, portrayed by Edward Holmes, is the star of the P.B.S. "Equal Justice under Law" series. By William F. Swindler T HEBuilding-"Equal MOTTO on the Justice facade under of-the Law"-is Supreme also Court the title of a series of five films that will have their pre- mieres next month on the Public Broadcasting Service network. Commissioned by the Bicentennial Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States and produced for public television by the P.B.S. national production center at WQED, Pittsburgh, the films are intended to inform the general public, as well as educational and professional audiences, on the American constitutional heritage as exemplified in the major decisions of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall. ABOVE: Marshall confers with Justice Joseph Story (left) and Jus- Four constitutional cases are dramatized in the tice Bushrod Washington (right). BELOW: Aaron Burr is escorted to series-including the renowned judicial review issue jail. in Marbury v. Madison in 1803, the definition of "nec- essary and proper" powers of national government in the "bank case" (McCulloch v.
  • Folk Song in Cumbria: a Distinctive Regional

    Folk Song in Cumbria: a Distinctive Regional

    FOLK SONG IN CUMBRIA: A DISTINCTIVE REGIONAL REPERTOIRE? A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Susan Margaret Allan, MA (Lancaster), BEd (London) University of Lancaster, November 2016 ABSTRACT One of the lacunae of traditional music scholarship in England has been the lack of systematic study of folk song and its performance in discrete geographical areas. This thesis endeavours to address this gap in knowledge for one region through a study of Cumbrian folk song and its performance over the past two hundred years. Although primarily a social history of popular culture, with some elements of ethnography and a little musicology, it is also a participant-observer study from the personal perspective of one who has performed and collected Cumbrian folk songs for some forty years. The principal task has been to research and present the folk songs known to have been published or performed in Cumbria since circa 1900, designated as the Cumbrian Folk Song Corpus: a body of 515 songs from 1010 different sources, including manuscripts, print, recordings and broadcasts. The thesis begins with the history of the best-known Cumbrian folk song, ‘D’Ye Ken John Peel’ from its date of composition around 1830 through to the late twentieth century. From this narrative the main themes of the thesis are drawn out: the problem of defining ‘folk song’, given its eclectic nature; the role of the various collectors, mediators and performers of folk songs over the years, including myself; the range of different contexts in which the songs have been performed, and by whom; the vexed questions of ‘authenticity’ and ‘invented tradition’, and the extent to which this repertoire is a distinctive regional one.
  • Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority

    Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority

    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 74 Issue 3 April 2021 Article 5 4-2021 Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Christian R. Burset, Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review 621 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset* The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial power, but we have misunderstood its origins. Discussions of the doctrine begin not with a constitutional text or even a court case, but a letter in which the Jay Court rejected President Washington’s request for legal advice. Courts and scholars have offered a variety of explanations for the Jay Court’s behavior. But they all depict the earliest Justices as responding to uniquely American concerns about advisory opinions. This Article offers a different explanation. Drawing on previously untapped archival sources, it shows that judges throughout the anglophone world—not only in the United States but also in England and British India— became opposed to advisory opinions in the second half of the eighteenth century. The death of advisory opinions was a global phenomenon, rooted in a period of anxiety about common-law authority.
  • Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait Paul R

    Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait Paul R

    Louisiana Law Review Volume 43 | Number 4 Symposium: Maritime Personal Injury March 1983 Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait Paul R. Baier Louisiana State University Law Center Repository Citation Paul R. Baier, Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait, 43 La. L. Rev. (1983) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol43/iss4/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. V ( TI DEDICATION OF PORTRAIT EDWARD DOUGLASS WHITE: FRAME FOR A PORTRAIT* Oration at the unveiling of the Rosenthal portrait of E. D. White, before the Louisiana Supreme Court, October 29, 1982. Paul R. Baier** Royal Street fluttered with flags, we are told, when they unveiled the statue of Edward Douglass White, in the heart of old New Orleans, in 1926. Confederate Veterans, still wearing the gray of '61, stood about the scaffolding. Above them rose Mr. Baker's great bronze statue of E. D. White, heroic in size, draped in the national flag. Somewhere in the crowd a band played old Southern airs, soft and sweet in the April sunshine. It was an impressive occasion, reported The Times-Picayune1 notable because so many venerable men and women had gathered to pay tribute to a man whose career brings honor to Louisiana and to the nation. Fifty years separate us from that occasion, sixty from White's death.
  • Supreme Court Database Code Book Brick 2018 02

    Supreme Court Database Code Book Brick 2018 02

    The Supreme Court Database Codebook Supreme Court Database Code Book brick_2018_02 CONTRIBUTORS Harold Spaeth Michigan State University College of Law Lee Epstein Washington University in Saint Louis Ted Ruger University of Pennsylvania School of Law Sarah C. Benesh University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Department of Political Science Jeffrey Segal Stony Brook University Department of Political Science Andrew D. Martin University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and the Arts Document Crafted On October 17, 2018 @ 11:53 1 of 128 10/17/18, 11:58 AM The Supreme Court Database Codebook Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY 1 Introduction 2 Citing to the SCDB IDENTIFICATION VARIABLES 3 SCDB Case ID 4 SCDB Docket ID 5 SCDB Issues ID 6 SCDB Vote ID 7 U.S. Reporter Citation 8 Supreme Court Citation 9 Lawyers Edition Citation 10 LEXIS Citation 11 Docket Number BACKGROUND VARIABLES 12 Case Name 13 Petitioner 14 Petitioner State 15 Respondent 16 Respondent State 17 Manner in which the Court takes Jurisdiction 18 Administrative Action Preceeding Litigation 19 Administrative Action Preceeding Litigation State 20 Three-Judge District Court 21 Origin of Case 22 Origin of Case State 23 Source of Case 24 Source of Case State 2 of 128 10/17/18, 11:58 AM The Supreme Court Database Codebook 25 Lower Court Disagreement 26 Reason for Granting Cert 27 Lower Court Disposition 28 Lower Court Disposition Direction CHRONOLOGICAL VARIABLES 29 Date of Decision 30 Term of Court 31 Natural Court 32 Chief Justice 33 Date of Oral Argument 34 Date of Reargument SUBSTANTIVE
  • A Tectonic History of Northwest England

    A Tectonic History of Northwest England

    A tectonic history of northwest England FRANK MOSELEY CONTENTS Introduction 56x Caledonian earth movements 562 (A) Skiddaw Slate structures . 562 (B) Borrowdale Volcanic structures . 570 (C) Deformation of the Coniston Limestone and Silurian rocks 574 (D) Comment on Ingleton-Austwick inlier 580 Variscan earth movements. 580 (A) General . 580 (B) Folds 584 (C) Fractures. 587 4 Post Triassic (Alpine) earth movements 589 5 References 59 ° SUMMARY Northwest England has been affected by the generally northerly and could be posthumous Caledonian, Variscan and Alpine orogenies upon a pre,Cambrian basement. The end- no one of which is entirely unrelated to the Silurian structures include early N--S and later others. Each successive phase is partially NE to ~NE folding. dependent on earlier ones, whilst structures The Variscan structures are in part deter- in older rocks became modified by succeeding mined by locations of the older massifs and in events. There is thus an evolutionary structural part they are likely to be posthumous upon sequence, probably originating in a pre- older structures with important N-S and N~. Cambrian basement and extending to the elements. Caledonian wrench faults were present. reactivated, largely with dip slip movement. The Caledonian episodes are subdivided into The more gentle Alpine structures also pre-Borrowdale Volcanic, pre-Caradoc and follow the older trends with a N-s axis of warp end-Silurian phases. The recent suggestions of or tilt and substantial block faulting. The latter a severe pre-Borrowdale volcanic orogeny are was a reactivation of older fault lines and rejected but there is a recognizable angular resulted in uplift of the old north Pennine unconformity at the base of the volcanic rocks.
  • LA SENTENCIA MARBURY V. MADISON Aa

    LA SENTENCIA MARBURY V. MADISON Aa

    LA SENTENCIA MARBURY V. MADISON FRANCISCO FERNÁNDEZ SEGADO (*) SUMARIO: 1. EL SUPUESTO DE HECHO DESENCADENAN ­ TE DEL CASO .—2. LA ARGU M ENTACIÓN J URÍ ­ DICA DE CHARLES LEE , EL A B OGADO DE LOS DE M ANDANTES .—3. LOS PROLEGÓ M ENOS DEL J UICIO .—4. EL DESARROLLO DE LA VISTA .—5. LA SENTENCIA MARBURY V. MADISON .—A) Su enfo- que sistemático.—B) Su significativo apar- tamiento del orden procesal normal.—6. EL ITER ARGU M ENTAL DE LA SENTENCIA .—A) El derecho de William Marbury a la entrega de su nombramiento.—B) La legitimidad de la reacción jurídica frente a la violación del derecho.—C) La pertinencia del ins- trumento del writ of mandamus.—D) La imposibilidad de emisión del writ of man- damus por la Corte.—a) La inconstituciona- lidad de la Sección 13 de la Judiciary Act de 1789.—b) La doctrina de la judicial review. Su fundamentación.—aʼ) Los argumentos de carácter general.—aʼʼ) La Constitución como «paramount law» y la nulidad de todo acto le- gislativo en contradicción con ella.—bʼʼ) La teoría de la judicial function.—bʼ) Los ar- gumentos entresacados del texto literal de la Constitución.—aʼʼ) La cláusula sobre la (*) Catedrático de Derecho Constitucional. Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Com- plutense de Madrid. extensión del poder judicial (arising-under clause).—bʼʼ) La supremacy clause.—cʼʼ) La cláusula del juramento (oath clause).—cʼ) La ausencia de toda referencia a los precedentes jurisprudenciales y a la posición de los Framers ante la judicial review.—dʼ) Recapitulación sobre la argumentación de Marshall.—7. LOS RASGOS CON F IGURADORES DE LA PRI M ERA DOCTRI ­ NA SO B RE LA JUDICIAL REVIEW .
  • Dent to Aye Gill Pike This Rewarding Walk Has Spectacular Views of the Howgill Fells (Below), the Three Peaks of Yorkshire, and Dentdale

    Dent to Aye Gill Pike This Rewarding Walk Has Spectacular Views of the Howgill Fells (Below), the Three Peaks of Yorkshire, and Dentdale

    Dent to Aye Gill Pike This rewarding walk has spectacular views of the Howgill Fells (below), the Three Peaks of Yorkshire, and Dentdale. Start: Dent car park (GPS: SD 703 871) Distance: 10.5km (6.5 miles) Highest point: 556m (Aye Gill Pike summit) Time: Allow 3 to 4 hours Grade: Difficult Notes: This route has sections with no obvious path, so a map and navigational skills are required. There are short sections on quiet roads where care should be taken, and the route can be boggy in places. There are toilets, a village shop, café and pubs in Dent. Other options: For a more challenging experience, follow this route in the opposite direction, beginning with the very steep climb up to Aye Gill Pike. 1. (GPS: SD 704 870) Turn left out of the car park and walk through the cobbled village centre. Leave the village on this road and pick up the riverside path for the Dales Way on your left, just before the river Dee. Follow this path until you reach the tarmac road. 2. (GPS: SD 700 873) Turn right along the road and pick up the Dales Way again on your right, continuing along the river to the road at Barth Bridge. 3. (GPS: SD 694 878) At the road turn right. Walk along here for a short distance (approx 150m) and turn up the small tarmac lane on your right. Continue along this quiet lane for approximately 1km, until reaching Lunds Farm. 4. (GPS: SD 694 887) At the entrance to Lunds Farm turn left and continue through the cobbled yard.
  • RR 01 07 Lake District Report.Qxp

    RR 01 07 Lake District Report.Qxp

    A stratigraphical framework for the upper Ordovician and Lower Devonian volcanic and intrusive rocks in the English Lake District and adjacent areas Integrated Geoscience Surveys (North) Programme Research Report RR/01/07 NAVIGATION HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS DOCUMENT Bookmarks The main elements of the table of contents are bookmarked enabling direct links to be followed to the principal section headings and sub-headings, figures, plates and tables irrespective of which part of the document the user is viewing. In addition, the report contains links: from the principal section and subsection headings back to the contents page, from each reference to a figure, plate or table directly to the corresponding figure, plate or table, from each figure, plate or table caption to the first place that figure, plate or table is mentioned in the text and from each page number back to the contents page. RETURN TO CONTENTS PAGE BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT RR/01/07 A stratigraphical framework for the upper Ordovician and Lower Devonian volcanic and intrusive rocks in the English Lake The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the District and adjacent areas Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/2004. D Millward Keywords Lake District, Lower Palaeozoic, Ordovician, Devonian, volcanic geology, intrusive rocks Front cover View over the Scafell Caldera. BGS Photo D4011. Bibliographical reference MILLWARD, D. 2004. A stratigraphical framework for the upper Ordovician and Lower Devonian volcanic and intrusive rocks in the English Lake District and adjacent areas. British Geological Survey Research Report RR/01/07 54pp.