Attachment 1.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attachment 1.Pdf Q. Is imaging technology optional? A. Yes, imaging technology screening is optional for all passengers. Passengers who do not wish to receive imagining technology screening will receive alternative screening, including a physical pat-down. Q. Is imaging technology safe? A. Advanced imaging technology is safe and meets national health and safety standards. Backscatter technology was evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), and the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL). For comparison, a single scan using backscatter technology produces exposure equivalent to two minutes of flying on an airplane, and the energy projected by millimeter wave technology is thousands of times less than a cell phone transmission. Millimeter wave imaging technology meets all known national and international health and safety standards. In fact, the energy emitted by millimeter wave technology is 1000 times less than the international limits and guidelines. Q. What has TSA done to protect my privacy? A. TSA has implemented strict measures to protect passenger privacy, which is ensured through the anonymity of the image. For millimeter wave technology: Automated target recognition (ATR) software detects any metallic and non-metallic threats concealed under a passenger’s clothing by displaying a generic outline of a person on a monitor attached to the AIT unit highlighting any areas that may require additional screening. The generic outline of a person will be identical for all passengers. If no anomalies are detected, an “OK” appears on the screen with no outline. For Backscatter technology: A remotely located officer views the image and does not see the passenger, and the officer assisting the passenger cannot view the image. The image cannot be stored, transmitted or printed, and is deleted immediately once viewed. Additionally, there is a privacy algorithm applied to blur the image. Q. How does the imaging technology screening process work? A. Each passenger will be asked to take everything out of their pockets (including non-metallic items) and walk into the imaging portal. Once inside, they will be asked to stand in a position and remain still for a few seconds while the technology creates an image in real time. Passengers then exit the opposite side of the portal and collect belongings. The entire process takes a matter of seconds. Q. How does backscatter imaging technology work? A. Backscatter technology projects an ionizing X-ray beam over the body surface at high speed. The reflection, or “backscatter,” of the beam is detected, digitized and displayed on a monitor. Each full body scan produces less than 10 microREM of emission, the equivalent to the exposure each person receives in about 2 minutes of airplane flight at altitude. It produces an image that resembles a chalk-etching, and has a privacy filter applied to the entire body. Q. How does millimeter wave imaging technology work? A. Millimeter wave imaging technology uses harmless electromagnetic waves to detect potential threats, which are highlighted on a generic outline of a person appearing on a monitor attached to the unit. If no anomalies are detected, an “OK” appears on the screen with no outline. Q. Where are imaging technology machines located? A. Currently, there are over 800 advanced imaging technology machines located at approximately 200 airports nationwide. Airports that have, or are scheduled to receive, imaging technology: Abilene Regional Airport (ABI) Akron-Canton Airport (CAK) Albany International Airport (ALB) Albuquerque International Sunport (ABQ) Amarillo International Airport (AMA) Aspen-Pitkin County Airport (ASE) Atlantic City International Airport (ACY) Augusta Regional Airport (AGS) Austin Straubel International Airport (GRB) Austin-Bergstrom Airport (AUS) Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI) Bangor International Airport (BGR) Baton Rouge Airport (BTR) Billings Logan International Airport (BIL) Bishop International Airport (FNT) Bismark Municipal Airport (BIS) Blue Grass Airport (LEX) Boise Airport (BOI) Boston Logan International Airport (BOS) Bozeman Gallatin Field Airport (BZN) Bradley International Airport (BDL) Brownsville/South Padre Island International Airport (BRO) Buffalo Niagara International Airport (BUF) Burbank Bob Hope Airport (BUR) Burlington International Airport (BTV) Bush Houston Intercontinental Airport (IAH) Casper Natrona County International Airport (CPR) Cedar Rapids Eastern Iowa Airport (CID) Central Illinois Regional Airport (BMI) Central Wisconsin Airport (CWA) Champaign Willard Airport (CMI) Charleston International Airport (CHS) Charleston Yeager Airport (CRW) Charlotte County Airport (PGD) Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT) Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport (CHA) Cherry Capital Airport (TVC) Chicago Midway Airport (MDW) Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD) Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG) Cleveland International Airport (CLE) Columbia Metropolitan Airport (CAE) Columbus Metropolitan Airport (CSG) Cordova Municipal Airport (CDV) Corpus Christi International Airport (CRP) Cyril E King Airport (STT) Dallas Love Field Airport (DAL) Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) Dane County Regional Airport (MSN) Dayton International Airport (DAY) Daytona Beach Airport (DAB) Denver International Airport (DEN) Des Moines International Airport (DSM) Detroit Metropolitan Airport (DTW) Dothan Regional Airport (DHN) Eagle County Regional Airport (EGE) El Paso International Airport (ELP) Elmira/Corning Regional Airport (ELM) Eugene Airport (EUG) Fairbanks International Airport (FAI) Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL) Fort Walton Beach Airport (VPS) Fort Wayne International Airport (FWA) Fresno Air Terminal Airport (FAT) Gainesville Regional Airport (GNV) Gary Regional Airport (GYY) General Mitchell Milwaukee International Airport (MKE) Gerald R. Ford International Airport (GRR) Glacier Park International Airport (GPI) Grand Forks International Airport (GFK) Greenbrier Valley Airport (LWB) Greenville/Spartanburg Airport (GSP) Guam Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport (GUM) Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport (GPT) Gunnison-Crested Butte Regional Airport (GUC) Harlingen/Valley International Airport (HRL) Harrisburg International Airport (MDT) Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) Hector International Airport (FAR) Helena Regional Airport (HLN) Henry E. Rohlsen Airport (STX) Hilo International Airport (ITO) Honolulu International Airport (HNL) Houston William Hobby Airport (HOU) Huntington Tri-State Airport (HTS) Huntsville International Airport (HSV) Indianapolis International Airport (IND) Jackson Hole Airport (JAC) Jacksonville International Airport (JAX) John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) John Wayne International Airport (SNA) Juneau International Airport (JNU) Kahului Airport (OGG) Kansas City International Airport (MCI) Ketchikan International Airport (KTN) Key West International Airport (EYW) Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport (GRK) Knoxville McGee Tyson Airport (TYS) Kona International Airport (KOA) La Crosse Municipal Airport (LSE) La Guardia International Airport (LGA) LA/Ontario International Airport (ONT) Lambert-St. Louis International Airport (STL) Lansing Capital City Airport (LAN) Laredo International Airport (LRD) Lihue Airport (LIH) Little Rock National Airport (LIT) Long Island MacArthur Airport (ISP) Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY) Louisville International Airport (SDF) Lubbock International Airport (LBB) Luiz Muñoz Marin International Airport (SJU) Mammoth Yosemite Airport (MMH) Manchester Airport (MHT) McAllen Miller International Airport (MFE) McCarran International Airport (LAS) Meadows Field Airport (BFL) Medford Rogue Valley International Airport (MFR) Melbourne International Airport (MLB) Memphis International Airport (MEM) Miami International Airport (MIA) Midland International Airport (MAF) Mineta San José International Airport (SJC) Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport (MSP) Minot International Airport (MOT) Missoula International Airport (MSO) Mobile Regional Airport (MOB) Montgomery Regional Airport (MGM) Montrose Regional Airport (MTJ) Myrtle Beach International Airport (MYR) Nashville International Airport (BNA) Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport (PHF) Norfolk International Airport (ORF) Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport (XNA) Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport (ECP) Oakland International Airport (OAK) Omaha Eppley Field Airport (OMA) Orlando International Airport (MCO) Outagamie County Regional Airport (ATW) Pago Pago International Airport (PPG) Palm Beach International Airport (PBI) Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) Pensacola Gulf Coast Regional Airport (PNS) Peoria Airport (PIA) Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) Phoenix Williams Gateway Airport (IWA) Piedmont Triad International Airport (GSO) Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT) Port Columbus International Airport (CMH) Portland International Airport (PDX) Portland International Jetport (PWM) Provo Municipal Airport (PVU) Pueblo Memorial Airport
Recommended publications
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Safetaxi Americas Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle
    SafeTaxi Americas Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle Brazil Acre Identifier Airport Name City State SBCZ Cruzeiro do Sul International Airport Cruzeiro do Sul AC SBRB Plácido de Castro Airport Rio Branco AC Alagoas Identifier Airport Name City State SBMO Zumbi dos Palmares International Airport Maceió AL Amazonas Identifier Airport Name City State SBEG Eduardo Gomes International Airport Manaus AM SBMN Ponta Pelada Military Airport Manaus AM SBTF Tefé Airport Tefé AM SBTT Tabatinga International Airport Tabatinga AM SBUA São Gabriel da Cachoeira Airport São Gabriel da Cachoeira AM Amapá Identifier Airport Name City State SBMQ Alberto Alcolumbre International Airport Macapá AP Bahia Identifier Airport Name City State SBIL Bahia-Jorge Amado Airport Ilhéus BA SBLP Bom Jesus da Lapa Airport Bom Jesus da Lapa BA SBPS Porto Seguro Airport Porto Seguro BA SBSV Deputado Luís Eduardo Magalhães International Airport Salvador BA SBTC Hotéis Transamérica Airport Una BA SBUF Paulo Afonso Airport Paulo Afonso BA SBVC Vitória da Conquista/Glauber de Andrade Rocha Vitória da Conquista BA Ceará Identifier Airport Name City State SBAC Aracati/Aeroporto Regional de Aracati Aracati CE SBFZ Pinto Martins International Airport Fortaleza CE SBJE Comandante Ariston Pessoa Cruz CE SBJU Orlando Bezerra de Menezes Airport Juazeiro do Norte CE Distrito Federal Identifier Airport Name City State SBBR Presidente Juscelino Kubitschek International Airport Brasília DF Espírito Santo Identifier Airport Name City State SBVT Eurico de Aguiar Salles Airport Vitória ES *Denotes
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Commercial Airline Service at Bishop Airport
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WESTERN-PACIFIC REGION _______________________________ FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND RECORD OF DECISION _______________________________ Proposed Commercial Airline Service at Bishop Airport Bishop Airport Bishop, Inyo County, California For further information Camille Garibaldi U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region Los Angeles Airports District Office 777 S. Aviation Blvd., Suite 150 El Segundo, CA 902457 (650) 827-7613 August 12, 2021 GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT WHAT’S IN THIS DOCUMENT? This document is the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Record of Decision (ROD) for the proposed introduction of commercial air service to Bishop Airport (BIH) located in Bishop, Inyo County, California. This document includes the agency determinations and approvals for those proposed Federal actions described in the Final Environmental Assessment (EA) dated August 2021. This document summaries the alternatives considered by FAA in reaching its decision, summarizes the analysis used to evaluate the alternatives, and briefly summarizes the potential environmental consequences of the Proposed Action and the No Action alternative, which are evaluated in detail in the Final EA attached to this FONSI-ROD. This document also identifies the environmentally preferred alternative and the agency preferred alternative. BACKGROUND. On March 2, 2021, the County of Inyo released the Draft Environmental Assessment for Proposed Commercial Airline Service at Bishop Airport for public review. The Draft EA addressed the potential environmental effects of commercial passenger air service at Bishop Airport. To allow commercial service to occur, Inyo County seeks issuance of a Class I Operating Certificate pursuant to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 139, Certification of Airports from the FAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoth Yosemite Airport Terminal Area Development Plan
    MMAMMOTH YYOSEMITE AAIRPORT TTERMINAL AAREA DDEVELOPMENT PPLAN TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, CALIFORNIA August 2013 MAMMOTH YOSEMITE AIRPORT TERMINAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepared for Town of Mammoth Lakes, California Prepared by: Reinard W. Brandley Consulting Airport Engineer Van Sant Group Architects August 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS MAMMOTH YOSEMITE AIRPORT TERMINAL AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, MONO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction............................................................................................... 1-1 1-1 History ..................................................................................... 1-1 1-2 Aviation Forecasts ................................................................... 1-2 1-3 Existing Facilities ..................................................................... 1-3 1-4 Required Action ....................................................................... 1-3 Chapter 2. Purpose and Need ................................................................................... 2-1 Chapter 3. Site Selection ..................................................................................... 3-1 Chapter 4. Terminal Building................................................................................ 4-1 4-1 Terminal Building Requirements.............................................. 4-1 4-1.1 Aircraft Gates ............................................................. 4-1 4-1.2 Airline Space .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoth Yosemite Airport Mammoth Lakes, California Airport Layout
    MammothMammoth YosemiteYosemite AirportAirport MammothMammoth Lakes,Lakes, CaliforniaCalifornia Revised/ConformedRevised/Conformed DraftDraft AirportAirport LayoutLayout PlanPlan UpdateUpdate NarrativeNarrative May 2012 REVISED/CONFORMED DRAFT MAMMOTH YOSEMITE AIRPORT AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN UPDATE NARRATIVE Prepared for Town of Mammoth Lakes, California Prepared by: Reinard W. Brandley Consulting Airport Engineer May 2012 The preparation of this document was financed, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration as provided under Title 49 U.S.C., Section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the F.A.A. Acceptance of this report by the F.A.A. does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted herein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws. TABLE OF CONTENTS MAMMOTH YOSEMITE AIRPORT AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN UPDATE NARRATIVE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, MONO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...........................................................................ES-1 Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2. Inventory.............................................................................................. 2-1 2-1 Location and Setting ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation July 2020
    AIRPORT MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 5 - RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS centurIon PLANNING AND DESIGN AIRPORT MASTER PLAN – CHAPTER FIVE | RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The selection of a Recommended Development Concept is based on a combination of efforts by the planning team, Airport and City leadership, and tenant input. The airport master planning process for San Angelo Regional Airport (SJT) began with an inventory of existing facilities (Chapter One) followed by an evaluation of existing and potential future operational demand (Chapter Two) and facilities necessary to accommodate such demand (Chapter Three). Development alternatives were formulated to meet airport needs (Chapter Four) and then presented to the Planning and Technical Advisory Committees. Input received from these committees, Airport Leadership, and City Leadership resulted in the identification of the Recommended Development Concept. The purpose of this chapter is to describe the recommended direction for the future development of SJT. This begins with a definition of the Recommended Development Concept. This concept will be appropriately phased, taking into consideration the planning horizons defined within the aviation forecasts and facility requirements. The phasing will result in the formulation of a Capital Improvement Program and a financial plan will define the financial implications and opportunities of planned development. Recommended Development Concept The Recommended Development Concept is depicted on Exhibit 5A. This concept provides airport improvements that not only conform to the City’s goals and objectives but also meet identified facility needs while maintaining flexibility for future airfield expansion. The Recommended Development Concept was prepared after the development alternatives presented in Chapter Four were vetted and refined based on stakeholder input.
    [Show full text]
  • CAE Dothan Training Center
    1942-2017 pg. 50 NETWORK l RECOGNITION l VOICE l SUPPORT July 31, 2017 CAE Dothan Training Center Your worldwide training partner of choice MAINTAIN TO TRAIN At DynCorp International, we recognize how critical aviation maintenance is to supporting the Army’s top priority: readiness. Through our ongoing work supporting the Army’s operational helicopter fleet, we maintain more rotary wing aircraft than any other company, and are the trusted partner in supporting initial flight training for the U.S. military. Our innovative techniques and integrated maintenance solutions reduce costs, increase availability, and ensure the readiness necessary to support the Army’s vital rotary wing flight training mission. www.dyn-intl.com ARMY AVIATION Magazine 2 July 31, 2017 DynCorp MaintainToTrain ArmyAviation.indd 1 1/3/17 2:49 PM 28 Contents July 31, 2017, Vol. 66, No. 7 8 TO THE FIELD 8 Aviation Branch Chief Update By MG William K. Gayler 10 Chief Warrant Officer of the Branch Update By CW5 Joseph B. Roland 12 Branch Command Sergeant Major Update By CSM Gregory M. Chambers and LTC Thomas W. Bamford 14 Reserve Components Avation Update By BG Scott R. Morcomb 10 16 128th Aviation Brigade Update By SSG Zachary T. Barber 18 AMRDEC Tech Talk By Mr. Christopher “Kit” Borden 20 Ask the Flight Surgeon By MAJ Sonya Heidt, MD 22 Combat Readiness Center Update By COL James T. Donovan 24 SPECIAL FOCUS — Training 24 Aviation Training Update By COL Brian Walsh, LTC Ken Smith, and Mr. Ron Moring 28 Aviation Training and the ATP Commander By MAJ Trenten J.
    [Show full text]
  • RFQ) Eastern Sierra Air Service Strategic Plan
    Mammoth Lakes Tourism Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Eastern Sierra Air Service Strategic Plan Date Issued: May 25, 2017 Response Due Date: June 30, 2017 Send Proposals to: Mammoth Lakes Tourism John Urdi - Executive Director PO Box 48 Mammoth Lakes, California 93546-0048 Questions may be directed to John Urdi at 760-934-2712 ext. 1259 or by emaiL at [email protected] Mammoth Lakes Tourism Mammoth Lakes Tourism (MLT) is a 501c(6) entity under contract With the ToWn of Mammoth Lakes (Town) to provide marketing and sales promotion outreach. MLT is also responsibLe for coordinating air service and funding subsidies for that air service in conjunction With other partners incLuding the ToWn of Mammoth Lakes, Mammoth Mountain Ski Area (MMSA) and Mono County. Situation Analysis Mammoth Lakes California is home to WorLd cLass skiing and riding at Mammoth Mountain (third most visited ski resort in the United States) as WeLL as being the eastern gateWay to Yosemite National Park. Each year more than 1.6 miLLion visitors choose Mammoth Lakes as a vacation destination. WhiLe the majority of the visitors are via automobiLes, year-round commercial air service has been in pLace since 2009. Mammoth Yosemite Airport (MMH) is Located just 10 miLes southeast of the ToWn of Mammoth Lakes and sits at an eLevation of 7,100 feet above sea LeveL. Current carriers incLude ALaska AirLines (LAX year-round and SAN Winter onLy on the Q400), United Airlines (SFO Winter onLy on the CRJ-700) and neW this season, scheduLed charter service With JetSuiteX from Burbank, CA on a modified 30 seat E135).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Legislative Agenda
    2020 ACA FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE AGENDA The Aviation Council of Alabama, Inc. 1207 Emerald Mountain Parkway Wetumpka, AL 36093 Todd Storey, President (District 2) www.aviationcouncilofalabama.com Tel: (334) 844-4606 Legislative Committee Rick Tucker (Chair), Huntsville International Airport (District 5) Scott Fuller, Jack Edwards National Airport ( (District 1) Barry Griffith, Northwest Alabama Regional Airport (District 5) Russ Kilgore, General Aviation at Large (District 1) Erskine Funderburg, St. Clair County Airport at Pell City (District 6) Jeff Powell, Tuscaloosa Regional Airport (District 7) Marshall Taggart, Montgomery Regional Airport (District 7) Rudder Williams, Scottsboro Municipal Airport (District 5) Devoski Boyd, Montgomery Regional Airport (District 7) Board of Directors Todd Storey, President, Auburn University Regional Airport (District 2) Thomas Hughes, Vice President, A.A.E., IAP, Vice President, (District 1) Jeff Powell, CM, Secretary, Tuscaloosa Regional Airport (District 7) Leslie Williams-Murray, Treasurer (District 7) Chris Curry, Mobile Regional Airport (District 1) Scott Fuller, Jack Edwards National Airport (District 1) Russ Kilgore, General Aviation at Large (District 1) Art Morris, III, Dothan Regional Airport (District 2) Thomas Day (District 3) Col. Roosevelt J. Lewis (USAF Ret.), Tuskegee Municipal Airport (District 3) Ray Miller, Talladega Municipal Airport (District 3) Jerry Cofield, Albertville Regional Airport (District 4) Rick Tucker, Huntsville International Airport (District 5) Rudder Williams, Scottsboro Municipal Airport (District 5) Nikki Jordan, Bessemer Airport Authority (District 6) Terry Franklin, Shelby County Airport (District 6) Erskine Funderburg, St. Clair County Airport at Pell City District 6) Michelle Conway, Goodwyn Mills Cawood (District 7) Marshall Taggart, Montgomery Regional Airport (District 7) FEDERAL PRIORITIES 2020 ACA FEDERAL AGENDA FAA/TSA FUNDING .
    [Show full text]
  • Factual Report Aviation
    This space for binding SEA07FA277 N240R National Transportation Safety Board NTSB ID: Aircraft Registration Number: FACTUAL REPORT Occurrence Date: 09/03/2007 Most Critical Injury: Fatal AVIATION Occurrence Type: Accident Investigated By: NTSB Location/Time Nearest City/Place State Zip Code Local Time Time Zone Mammoth Lakes CA 93546 0930 PDT Airport Proximity: Off Airport/Airstrip Distance From Landing Facility: Aircraft Information Summary Aircraft Manufacturer Model/Series Type of Aircraft Bellanca 8KCAB-180 Airplane Revenue Sightseeing Flight: No Air Medical Transport Flight: No Narrative Brief narrative statement of facts, conditions and circumstances pertinent to the accident/incident: HISTORY OF FLIGHT On September 3, 2007, approximately 0930 Pacific daylight time, a Bellanca 8KCAB-180 (Super Decathlon), N240R, collided with terrain while maneuvering in remote mountainous terrain approximately 8 miles west-northwest of Mammoth Lakes, California. The airplane was destroyed, and the airline transport pilot was killed. The airplane was registered to and operated by the Flying M Hunting Club, Inc, (Flying M). Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local personal flight, which originated from a private airport at the Flying M Ranch near Yerington, Nevada, between 0820 and 0830. No flight plan was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 flight. The Flying M Ranch Airport was located at 38 degrees 36.700 minutes north latitude and 119 degrees 0.083 minutes west longitude at an elevation of 4,953 feet. The accident site was located approximately 65 miles south of the departure airport. The Flying M's chief pilot had breakfast with the pilot on the day of the accident.
    [Show full text]
  • AAAE Delivers for Airport Executives
    AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES MEDIAKIT 1 Industry Friends and Colleagues: As we prepare for 2010, Airport Magazine is developing articles that will address industry concerns about the nation’s economic recovery; share lessons learned from the recession and the price of fuel and its impact on air service; provide timely information on regulatory and legislative issues; fulfill the far-ranging needs of airports for training information; describe the lessons airports have learned on subjects that include ARFF, technology and airfield and terminal improvements; and much more. Every feature and department in Airport Magazine is designed to deliver relevant, timely and insightful information to our readers. We have crafted our 2010 editorial calendar with these goals in mind. The 2010 lineup combines familiar topics — such as baggage screening, concessions and winter operations — with emerging ones that include NextGen and green airports. Our format will be as varied as our selection of articles: we’ll have roundtables with industry experts; articles written by airport officials; interviews with government and industry officials; and photo features to highlight aspects of our industry. Our ambitious plans for 2010 would not be possible, however, without the faithful support of Airport Magazine’s advertisers. For more than 20 years, companies that advertise to the airport community have trusted Airport Magazine to deliver their message to this audience. For potential advertisers, please consider this: by choosing our magazine to communicate your message, you are supporting not just an advertiser-funded magazine, but an entire association — the American Association of Airport Executives. All of us at Airport Magazine look forward to working with you in 2010 and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Facilities and Planning Sub Committee Report
    AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT BOARD June 10, 2009 MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Woody Gilliland, Vice Chairman, Vince Swinney, Jimi Coplen, Kirk Thaxton, Cindy Haley, David Lynn, Stan Egger MEMBERS ABSENT: Lawrence Gill, Chairman, Vic Corley, Joe Crowder, Jim Leonard AIRPORT STAFF: Don Green, Chris Taylor, Melissa Murphy, Alex Cargile CITY EMPLOYEES: Stanley Smith, City Attorney VISITORS: Gene Faulkner, URS, Tex Schmidt, URS, Bill Griffin, URS, Ken Martin, Jacob & Martin, Jerry Reed REGULAR SESSION 1. Call to order. Mr. Gilliland called the meeting to order at 3:35pm 2. Introduce visitors Mr. Gilliland introduced Mr. Faulkner, Mr. Schmidt, and Mr. Griffin with URS Engineering. Mr. Gilliland then introduced Mr. Martin with Jacob & Martin and Jerry Reed. 3. Consideration and Action approving minutes of the May 13th 2009 meeting Mr. Gilliland asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of the May 2009 meeting. Hearing none, the May 2009 meeting minutes stood approved as distributed. 4. Tenant Report There was no report at this time. 5. Economic Development Department Report Mr. Burdine forwarded information to Mr. Green to present. Mr. Burdine has a potential prospect who may be interested in proposing on Hangar 2. Hangar 0 & 3 lighting improvements have been completed. Hangars 0 and 1 insulation and bird netting are complete. The next project will be taking bids for repainting Hangar 4. 6. Facilities and Planning Sub Committee Report Meeting was delayed after the agenda was released. There was no Facilities and Planning Sub Committee report. 7. Airport Management Report: a. Review and acknowledgement of the May 2009 Statistical Reports Mr. Cargile presented the May 2009 Statistical report.
    [Show full text]