DOCSLIB.ORG

A Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cologne! Emil Fischer, Konrad Adenauer, and the Meirowsky Endowment** Lothar Jaenicke and Frieder W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cologne! Emil Fischer, Konrad Adenauer, and the Meirowsky Endowment** Lothar Jaenicke and Frieder W Essays History of Science A Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cologne! Emil Fischer, Konrad Adenauer, and the Meirowsky Endowment** Lothar Jaenicke and Frieder W. Lichtenthaler* Dedicated to Professor Klaus Hafner on the occasion of his 75th Birthday Keywords: Emil Fischer ¥ history of science ¥ Kaiser Wilhelm Society The award of the Nobel Prize for In March 1914 the Senate of the KWI Chemistry to Emil Fischer (Figure 1, had decided to set up a KWI for left) just over 100 years ago,[1] which fell Physiology in Berlin-Dahlem,[10] for into the year of his 50th birthday, gave which Emil Fischer suggested his long- many a reason to pay tribute to the time collaborator, friend, and colleague personality and scientific legacy of one Emil Abderhalden, Professor of Physi- of the towering figures of our science.[2±5] ology at Halle University since 1908, However, it also presents the opportu- whom he held in high regard.[11] After nity to remember facets of his work negotiations throughout April 1914 Ab- other than his scientific achieve- derhalden had agreed to accept the ments.[6, 7] It was largely due to his appointment. In public relations and Figure 1. Left: Emil Fischer (around 1915), inspiration and untiring energy that the the art of obtaining industrial sponsor- right: Konrad Adenauer (in 1917). idea of research, free from teaching ship he was a thoroughly modern per- duties–which he always regarded as for that purpose, and which was realized son, otherwise a child of his time and the an obvious duty but with increasing poor in 1911 with the foundation of the Swiss countryside.[12] His research cen- health also as a burden–took shape in Kaiser Wilhelm Gesellschaft (KWG), tered around the chemistry and action of the form of institutes established solely financed through the sponsorship of protein degradation products which im- patrons. The first Kaiser Wilhelm Insti- pressed medical doctors and the general tutes (KWIs)1 for Chemistry (Directors public. The KWI for Physiology was [*] Prof. Dr. F. W. Lichtenthaler Ernst Beckmann, Richard Willst‰tter) intended to provide favorable working Institut f¸r Organische Chemie and for Physical Chemistry and Electro- conditions for his proximity to practical Technische Universit‰t Darmstadt chemistry (Director Fritz Haber) were medicine. This institute was to have Petersenstrasse 22, 64287 Darmstadt (Germany) opened with much festivity as early as been completed in 1914, however, the Fax : (þ 49)6151-166-674 October 1912.[8] The Institute for Ex- well-advanced plans were abandoned in E-mail: [email protected] perimental Therapy and Biochemistry 1916 because of the war; instead, from stadt.de (Directors August von Wassermann, 1917 onwards, annual allowances were Prof. Dr. L. Jaenicke Carl Neuberg) followed a year later. paid by the KWG to the ™Abderhalden Institut f¸r Biochemie The KWI for Coal Research, the first research post∫ in Halle to promote Universit‰t zu Kˆln outside the Berlin-Dahlem area, the ™comparative biochemical investiga- Z¸lpicher Strasse 47, 50674 Cologne research profile of which Emil Fischer tions on the structure of proteins∫, and (Germany) [9] Fax : (þ 49)221-470-6431 laid down with determined foresight, later, when the terms became establish- [13] [**] We thank Frau Erna L‰mmel (Leopoldina opened in 1914 in M¸lheim (Ruhr) ed, ™vitamins and hormones∫. Abder- Archive, Halle), Dr. R. Rider (Bancroft under the leadership of Franz Fischer. halden, who did not consider himself Library, UC at Berkeley), J. Deres (Histor- Geographic dispersion and the incorpo- bound to Halle, was open to offers, even ical Archive of the City of Cologne), and T. ration of local interests for applied basic though he put down firm roots there M¸ller (University Archive, Cologne), for research were desired. later as the President of the Leopol- generously providing information. Picture dina2. credits: Edgar Fahs Smith Collection, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 1 As the successor organization to the Kaiser (E. Fischer), Stiftung Bundeskanzler-Ade- Wilhelm Society the Max Planck Society was 2 Leopoldina: German Academy of Natural nauer-Haus Rhˆndorf (K. Adenauer), and formed in 1948 as an independent research Scientists, founded 1652, the first scientific ref. [24] (M. Meirowsky). organization. academy world-wide. 722 ¹ 2003 Wiley-VCH VerlagGmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 1433-7851/03/4207-0722 $ 20.00+.50/0 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, No. 7 Angewandte Chemie From his political contacts in Berlin, and Abderhalden. Both clearly came to the prestige of scientific research and the conclusion that the City of Cologne circumstances surrounding the KWI for had more to do than merely solve the For the KWG a university en- Physiology were apparently known to question of the site, especially as the vironment was an essential Konrad Adenauer (Figure 1, right)[14] university environment, according to requirement, it promoted in- and appeared to be of use to him for the objectives of the KWG a prerequi- terdisciplinary basic research the benefit of his home town. Since site for interactive basic research, was 1908, Adenauer had been the first lacking. Cologne university, the oldest deputy mayor of the City of Cologne, and from 1917 onwards, at 41, the youngest Lord Mayor of the fourth- largest city in the German Empire and His Excellency as such a member of the Prussian Director of the Chemical Institute Herrenhaus (upper house). It is indica- Member of the Scientific Deputation for Medical Science tive of his ambitious vision that in Privy Councilor Dr. Fischer November 1917 he wanted to use ac- Berlin N.4 crued war gains of 1.2 million gold Cologne, May 23, 1918 marks donated to the city by an initially Your Excellency, anonymous Cologne industrialist to at- On the 10/11 of this month I was in Berlin on a matter concerning the Kaiser Wilhelm tract a KWI to his city, which in the Society. I was unable to discuss my suggestion with your Excellency in person, since you were, conception of the benefactor, Max Mei- so I had heard, absent from Berlin. I have therefore taken the liberty of bringing the matter to rowsky (Figure 2), was to be directed at your Excellency©s attention in writing, and I hope also to be able to discuss the matter with you in person during my next visit to Berlin on the occasion of the meeting of the Upper House on the June 5. A citizen of Cologne is willing to make 1200000 M available to the Kaiser Wilhelm Society for the Institute for Physiology planned by the Society on the condition that the Institute is established in Cologne with the leader designate, Professor Abderhalden and is to receive the grants previously planned by the Kaiser Wilhelm Society and the State. As I heard in Berlin, a site is to be made available by the provincial government free of charge for the Institute in Berlin-Dahlem. It became obvious to me that the City of Cologne would also have to make a site available without cost if the Institute were to come to Cologne. To make such a site available would not come up against any obstacle in the City of Cologne, but on the other hand it would not be to the benefactor©s liking as he would find it embarrassing that as a result of a donation, planned and given by him to the City of Cologne for reasons of pure Figure 2. Max Meirowsky. philanthropy, the city would be left with a burden. I am sure a way out of this difficulty will be found should it be absolutely necessary, even with consideration of the legitimate sensitivity of research into human, and in particular the benefactor, although at the moment it is not clear to me how this difficulty can be children©s nutrition, as he had been overcome. Privy councilor Abderhalden, with whom I have discussed this matter, would deeply moved by the misery of the warmly welcome the establishment of the Institute in Cologne and the increase in resources winter of hunger (1916/17) and the made possible by this endowment. I assume that he will correspondingly discuss his intentions suffering of children. with your Excellency in person. He has further assured me that constructional and material This induced Adenauer, after pre- difficulties would not arise for the Kaiser Wilhelm Society from the separation of the Institute liminary discussions with Abderhal- for Physiology from the other institutes to be established in Berlin-Dahlem. The foundation of den,[15] to a letter to Emil Fischer, the the Institute within its walls is of considerable interest for the City of Cologne. In the first vice-president of the KWG, written in instance, the reputation of Cologne and its scientific institutions would in this way be fostered, his characteristic administrative style a point upon which I lay great weight, because Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes are also established (see letter of May 23, 1918):[16] in Breslau and D¸sseldorf, but also, and I put great value upon this, it is of utmost importance This letter obviously initiated prob- for the intellectual life of Cologne with its 650000 inhabitants to have scientific establish- ing discussions between Adolf von Har- ments and prominent men within its walls so that the intellectual life emanating from them nack, the president of the KWG, and will counteract the strongly materialistic features of this large city. I would be especially obliged Emil Fischer, as well as between Fischer to your Excellency if you would intercede in favor of the establishment of the Institute in Cologne. I would also add that according to the explicit declaration of the benefactor, should his donation find no acceptance under the above conditions the sum will not be granted for Konrad Adenauer wished to use scientific purposes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ein Bisher Unbekanntes Zeitzeugnis
    N. T. M. 16 (2008) 103–115 0036-6978/08/010103–13 OUND DOI 10.1007/S00048-007-0277-7 © 2008 BIRKHÄUSER VERLAG, BASEL F & OST /L UNDSTÜCK Ein bisher unbekanntes Zeitzeugnis. F Otto Warburgs Tagebuchnotizen von Februar–April 1945 Kärin Nickelsen Warburg’s diary notes February–April 1945 Personal notes in the form of a diary, written by the German cell biologist Otto Warburg in the weeks before the collapse of Germany’s Third Reich (Feb.-April 1945), were found at the end of one of his labo- ratory notebooks, which are preserved in the Archives of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. These notes are unique in form and content: there seem to be no other surviving diary notes of this type. Written from a very personal perspective, they provide a detailed account of how Warburg experienced local events in this decisive and turbulent period. Furthermore, they clearly demonstrate Warburg’s embittered attitude towards some of his long-standing collaborators, whom he suspected of having denounced him to the Nazi authorities. In this paper, Warburg’s notes are fully transcribed and integrated into the historical context. Keywords: Otto Warburg, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Society, National Socialism, diary notes Schlüsselwörter: Otto Warburg, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft, Nationalsozialismus, Tagebuchnotizen | downloaded: 29.9.2021 Otto Warburg (1883–1970) ist in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte vor allem bekannt für seine bahnbrechenden Arbeiten zur Zellatmung, für die ihm 1931 der Nobelpreis verliehen wurde.1 In anderen Kontexten wiederum ist er bekannt als einer der ganz wenigen Wissenschaftler jüdischer Abstam- mung, die während der gesamten Zeit des Nationalsozialismus in Amt und Würden blieben: Nicht nur wurde Warburg nicht deportiert, er blieb bis 1945 Direktor des Kaiser-Wilhelm-Instituts (KWI) für Zellphysiologie in Berlin-Dahlem.2 Unter anderem stand er eigenen Angaben zufolge bis 1937 unter dem persönlichen Schutz von Friedrich Glum, damals Generaldirektor der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft (Werner 1991: 284).
    [Show full text]
  • Purges in Comparative Perspective: Rules for Exclusion and Inclusion in the Scientific Communityunder Political Pressure
    Purges in Comparative Perspective: Rules for Exclusion and Inclusion in the Scientific Communityunder Political Pressure Richard Beyler,Alexei Kojevnikov,and Jessica Wang* ABSTRACT During the intense political upheavalthat dominatedthe middle decades of the twentiethcentury, modem states intensifiedtheir drives to disciplinebroad sectors of society and ensuretheir political reliability.Subjected to such pressures,scien- tific institutionsfaced the challenge of admittingnew, officially mandatedcriteria into the regulationof scientificlife. We examinethe effects of these policies on the KaiserWilhelm Society in NationalSocialist Germany,the Max PlanckSociety in occupied Germanyafter 1945, the USSR Academy of Sciences throughoutthe Stalinera, and the NationalAcademy of Sciences in early cold warAmerica. In all these cases, while academicelites largelyaccepted the requiredradical changes in the rules for membershipin the scientificcommunity, they also soughtto manipu- late the processto theirown institutionaladvantage. INTRODUCTION The relationship between state power and professional autonomy has long constituted a major theme in the history of science. Throughout the eras of turmoil that defined their respective nations' politics from the 1930s through the 1950s, the states in Ger- many, the Soviet Union, and the United States became obsessively, at times para- noically, preoccupied with defining and adjudicating their citizens' political, ethnic, or moral acceptability. These concerns frequently resulted in purges from scientific institutions of persons deemed undesirable: "non-Aryans," communists, and social- ists in National Socialist Germany; "bourgeois experts" and "cosmopolites" in Stal- inist Russia; "communist sympathizers" and "subversives" in cold war America. Purges of this kind have often been understood as morality plays, with an under- standable emphasis on the victimization of the innocent by the repressive state. In what follows, we attempt to broaden the discussion by going beyond the phenomenon of purges as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Research in the Max Planck Society Science Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1945–1970
    Chapter 5 Basic Research in the Max Planck Society Science Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1945–1970 Carola Sachse ላሌ The Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG, Max- Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften) is commonly consid- ered a stronghold of basic research in the German research landscape. When it was reestablished in 1948 in the Western zones of occupation, the society adopted the defi ning part of its predecessor’s name, the Kaiser Wilhelm So- ciety for the Advancement of Science (KWG, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften), which had been founded in 1911. In contrast to its organizational counterpart, the Fraunhofer Society for the Ad- vancement of Applied Research (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung), whose distinctive purpose has been incorporated into its name since its foundation in 1949 (Trischler and vom Bruch 1999), the MPG did not include the term “basic research” in its full name, nor does the term appear in any of its statutes of the last one hundred years. The offi - cial documents of the MPG instead refer to “scientifi c research” in the broad German sense of wissenschaftliche Forschung and combine it in varying formu- lations with the terms “freedom” and “independence.”1 Both of these terms are cornerstones in what became known as Harnack- Prinzip (Harnack principle). Named after Adolf von Harnack, the initiator and fi rst and longtime serving president of the KWG, this principle included two main aspects: fi rst, institutes should be founded only if a man was avail- able (women were not considered) for the post of managing director “who has This open access library edition is supported by the University of Bonn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Highs and Lows of a Scientific Genius
    FLASHBACK_Chemistry The Highs and Lows of a Scientific Genius A century has passed since the German science world underwent rapid development in conjunction with the then-booming chemicals industry. The two chemistry institutes of the newly founded Kaiser Wilhelm Society were officially opened by the Kaiser himself in 1912. The first Director of the Institute for Physical Chemistry was Fritz Haber – a brilliant scientist whose achievements, however, were not without controversy. TEXT SUSANNE KIEWITZ The Kaiser was punctual, but the weather left research carried out there over the follow- something to be desired for the guests who ing two decades and, in memory and honor had gathered in pastoral Dahlem on October of this brilliant – but also controversial – sci- 23, 1912. The occasion was the official open- entist, the institute has borne his name ing of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Phys- since its incorporation into the Max Planck ical Chemistry and Electrochemistry and the Society in 1953. Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry. Ac- The son of a Jewish paint and chemicals cording to the official program, the distin- merchant, Haber was born in Breslau in 1868 guished persons from the fields of business, and completed his doctorate in chemistry in science and politics were to assume their Berlin in 1891. He embarked on his career as standing places in the narrow library of the a scientist at Karlsruhe Technical University, Institute for Chemistry by 9:45 a.m. sharp to where he made a name for himself with the await the arrival of the Kaiser, who would publication of the first textbook on electro- make his way by car to Dahlem, which, back chemistry, a subject which was then emerg- then, was still a rural village enclave on the ing as a separate scientific discipline that outskirts of Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the German Historical Institute Washington DC 44
    Bulletin of the German Historical Institute 44 | Spring 2009 5 Preface FEATURES 9 The Natural Sciences and Democratic Practices: Albert Einstein, Fritz Haber, and Max Planck Margit Szöllösi-Janze 23 Comment on Margit Szöllösi-Janze’s “The Natural Sciences and Democratic Practices” Cathryn Carson 29 Gender, Sexuality, and Belonging: Female Homosexuality in Germany, 1890-1933 Marti M. Lybeck 43 The Peaceful Revolution of the Fall of 1989 Marianne Birthler 59 Human Dignity and the Freedom of the Press Jutta Limbach GHI RESEARCH 71 Billy Graham’s Crusades in the 1950s: Neo-Evangelicalism between Civil Religion, Media, and Consumerism Uta Andrea Balbier CONFERENCE REPORTS 83 Proto-Eugenic Thinking before Galton Christoph Irmscher 89 Nature’s Accountability: Aggregation and Governmentality in the History of Sustainability Sabine Höhler and Rafael Ziegler 95 Trajectories of Decolonization: Elites and the Transformation from the Colonial to the Postcolonial Sönke Kunkel 100 Symposium in Memoriam of Gerald D. Feldman Uwe Spiekermann 104 Terrorism and Modernity: Global Perspectives on Nineteenth Century Political Violence Roni Dorot and Daniel Monterescu 112 A Whole New Game: Expanding the Boundaries of the History of Sports Christopher Young 118 Decoding Modern Consumer Societies: Preliminary Results, Ongoing Research, and Future Agendas Uwe Spiekermann 123 Global Migration Systems of Domestic and Care Workers Anke Ortlepp 128 17th Annual Symposium of the Friends of the GHI and Award of the Fritz Stern Dissertation Prize Richard F. Wetzell 130 Engineering Society: The “Scientifi cation of the Social” in Comparative Perspective, 1880-1990 Jochen F. Mayer 137 Writing East German History: What Difference Does the Cultural Turn Make? Heather L.
    [Show full text]
  • German Jewish Émigrés and US Invention
    Petra Moser, Alessandra Voena, Fabian Waldinger German Jewish émigrés and US invention Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Moser, Petra, Voena, Alessandra and Waldinger, Fabian (2014) German Jewish émigrés and US invention. American Economic Review, 104 (10). pp. 3222-3255. ISSN 0002-8282 DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.10.3222 © 2016 American Economic Association This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68322/ Available in LSE Research Online: December 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. American Economic Review 2014, 104(10): 3222–3255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3222 German Jewish Émigrés and US Invention † By Petra Moser, Alessandra Voena, and Fabian Waldinger * Historical accounts suggest that Jewish émigrés from Nazi Germany revolutionized US science. To analyze the émigrés’ effects on chemi- cal innovation in the United States, we compare changes in patent- ing by US inventors in research fields of émigrés with fields of other German chemists. Patenting by US inventors increased by 31 percent in émigré fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Harland Goff Wood
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES HARLAND GOFF WOOD 1907—1991 A Biographical Memoir by DA V I D A. G O L D Thw A I T AN D RIC HARD W. HANSON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1996 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. HARLAND GOFF WOOD September 2, 1907–September 12, 1991 BY DAVID A. GOLDTHWAIT AND RICHARD W. HANSON ARLAND GOFF WOOD, WHO was descended from William HGoffe (b. 1619), one of the appointed judges respon- sible for the beheading of King Charles I, was born on September 2, 1907, in the small town of Delavan, Minne- sota. His parents, both of whom had only a high school education, taught their four sons and one daughter to work hard and to be self-reliant—the result for the sons: two Ph.D.s, one Ph.D.-M.D., one M.D., and one LL.B; and for the daughter: an honorary LL.D. It is hard to picture Harland Wood as a frail child who spent two years in kindergarten and two years in the first grade. He and his brothers helped on the family’s farm in Mankato, Minnesota, walking the mile home from school at noon to water the stock and then running back after lunch. At Macalester College in Minne- sota, he majored in chemistry and there met Mildred Davis, whom he married in 1929. In 1931 he was accepted as a graduate student in bacteriology at Iowa State University at Ames by C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester Hamlin Werkman
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C HESTER HAMLIN WERKMAN 1893—1962 A Biographical Memoir by RUSSELL W. BROW N Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1974 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. CHESTER HAMLIN WERKMAN June 17,1897-Seþtember 10, 1962 BY RUSSELL W. BROWN ¡-ì nnsrrn HAMLTN wERKMAN broadly conceived of his sphere \.¡ of scientific interest as physiological microbiology. His career, which extended over a period of approximately forty years (1921-1962) was spent for the most part in the investiga- tion of the intermediate steps by which microorganisms accom- plished the biochemical transformations which enabled them to obtain energy for their essential role in nature. During that time he was one of a relatively small group of microbiologists 'Western in the United States and in Europe whose primary concerns were to understand and reconstruct the specific en- zymatic pathways involved in metabolic processes. The anaerobic and microaerophilic bacteria were of immediate interest be- cause their chemical transformations were more readily quan- titated and expressed by carbon and oxidation-reduction balances of the products. With these organisms it was possible generally to conduct experiments in which known quantities of substrates were converted to intermediate and end products which were determined quantitatively. A variety of quantitative methods and experimental procedures were developed which made it possible to greatly expand the knowledge of the bio- chemistry of microorganisms. Werkman and his students at Iowa State University and a group at the University of Wiscon- sin were perhaps the most productive investigators in the field 329 330 BrocRApHrcAL MEMoTRS of microbial biochemistry in the United States during the 1930s when work elsewhere was oriented primarily toward the morphology and the pathogenic activities of microorganisms.
    [Show full text]
  • James, Steinhauser, Hoffmann, Friedrich One Hundred Years at The
    James, Steinhauser, Hoffmann, Friedrich One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics Published under the auspices of the Board of Directors of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society: Hans-Joachim Freund Gerard Meijer Matthias Scheffler Robert Schlögl Martin Wolf Jeremiah James · Thomas Steinhauser · Dieter Hoffmann · Bretislav Friedrich One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics The Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society 1911–2011 De Gruyter An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Aut ho rs: Dr. Jeremiah James Prof. Dr. Dieter Hoffmann Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Institute for the Max Planck Society History of Science Faradayweg 4–6 Boltzmannstr. 22 14195 Berlin 14195 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Thomas Steinhauser Prof. Dr. Bretislav Friedrich Fritz Haber Institute of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society Max Planck Society Faradayweg 4–6 Faradayweg 4–6 14195 Berlin 14195 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Cover images: Front cover: Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, 1913. From left to right, “factory” building, main building, director’s villa, known today as Haber Villa. Back cover: Campus of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, 2011. The Institute’s his- toric buildings, contiguous with the “Röntgenbau” on their right, house the Departments of Physical Chemistry and Molecular Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Hitler Did Not Have Atomic Bombs
    Article Why Hitler Did Not Have Atomic Bombs Manfred Popp Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Weberstr. 5, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany; [email protected] Abstract: In the 75 years since the end of World War II there is still no agreement on the answer to the question of why the presumed race between the USA and Nazi-Germany to build the atomic bomb did not take place. New insights and answers are derived from a detailed analysis of the most important document on the subject, the official report of a German army ordnance dated February 1942. This authoritative document has so far not been adequately analyzed. It has been overlooked, particularly that the goal of the Uranium Project was the demonstration of a self-sustaining chain reaction as a precondition for any future work on power reactors and an atomic bomb. This paper explores why Werner Heisenberg and his colleagues did not meet this goal and what prevented a bomb development program. Further evidence is derived from the research reports of the Uranium Project and from the Farm Hall transcripts. Additional conclusions can be drawn from the omission of experiments, which could have been possible and would have been mandatory if the atomic bomb would have been the aim of the program. Special consideration is given to the role of Heisenberg in the Uranium Project. Keywords: German uranium project; atomic bomb concepts; reactor experiments; US-German race for the atomic bomb; Werner Heisenberg 1. Introduction Albert Einstein’s fear that the national socialist regime in Germany would develop atomic bombs was the initial impetus for the Manhattan Project in the USA [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Innovators, Deep Fermentation and Antibiotics: Promoting Applied Science Before and After the Second World War
    Innovators, deep fermentation and antibiotics: promoting applied science before and after the Second World War Robert Bud (*) (*) Science Museum, London. [email protected] Dynamis Fecha de recepción: 1 de abril de 2010 [0211-9536] 2011; 31 (2): 323-341 Fecha de aceptación: 3 de febrero de 2011 SUMMARY: 1.—Introduction. 2.—Know-how and deep-fermentation. 3.—Wartime. 4.—Post-war. 5.—Conclusion: on the disappearance of stories. ABSTRACT: The historiography of penicillin has tended to overlook the importance of developing and disseminating know-how in fermentation technology. A focus on this directs attention to work before the war of a network in the US and Europe concerned with the production of organic acids, particularly gluconic and citric acids. At the heart of this network was the German-Czech Konrad Bernhauer. Other members of the network were a group of chemists at the US Department of Agriculture who first recognized the production possibilities of penicillin. The Pfizer Corporation, which had recruited a leading Department of Agriculture scientist at the end of the First World War, was also an important centre of development as well as of production. However, in wartime Bernhauer was an active member of the SS and his work was not commemorated after his death in 1975. After the war new processes of fermentation were disseminated by penicillin pioneers such as Jackson Foster and Ernst Chain. Because of its commercial context his work was not well known. The conclusion of this paper is that the commercial context, on the one hand, and the Nazi associations of Bernhauer, on the other, have submerged the significance of know-how development in the history of penicillin.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.SCIENCE and IDEOLOGY the CASE of PHYSICS in NAZI
    Mètode Science Studies Journal ISSN: 2174-3487 [email protected] Universitat de València España Ball, Philip SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY THE CASE OF PHYSICS IN NAZI GERMANY Mètode Science Studies Journal, núm. 7, 2017, pp. 69-77 Universitat de València Valencia, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511754472011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative MONOGRAPH Mètode Science StudieS Journal, 7 (2017): 69–77. University of Valencia. DOI: 10.7203/metode.7.7665 ISSN: 2174-3487. Article received: 14/12/2015, accepted: 17/02/2016. SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY THE CASE OF PHYSICS IN NAZI GERMANY PHILIP BALL Science is not «above» politics and ethics: it is intrinsically political, and constantly raises ethical dilemmas. The consequences of evading such issues were made particularly clear in the actions of scientists working in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 40s. The accusation in 2006 that Dutch physicist Peter Debye was an opportunist who colluded with the Nazis reopened the debate about the conduct of physicists at that time. Here I consider what those events can tell us about the relationship of science and politics today. I argue that an insistence that science is an abstract, apolitical inquiry into nature is a myth that can leave it morally compromised and vulnerable to political manipulation. Keywords: Nazism, German physics, science and politics, Peter Debye. Science, it is often said, must be free from ideology.
    [Show full text]