The Highs and Lows of a Scientific Genius
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ein Bisher Unbekanntes Zeitzeugnis
N. T. M. 16 (2008) 103–115 0036-6978/08/010103–13 OUND DOI 10.1007/S00048-007-0277-7 © 2008 BIRKHÄUSER VERLAG, BASEL F & OST /L UNDSTÜCK Ein bisher unbekanntes Zeitzeugnis. F Otto Warburgs Tagebuchnotizen von Februar–April 1945 Kärin Nickelsen Warburg’s diary notes February–April 1945 Personal notes in the form of a diary, written by the German cell biologist Otto Warburg in the weeks before the collapse of Germany’s Third Reich (Feb.-April 1945), were found at the end of one of his labo- ratory notebooks, which are preserved in the Archives of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. These notes are unique in form and content: there seem to be no other surviving diary notes of this type. Written from a very personal perspective, they provide a detailed account of how Warburg experienced local events in this decisive and turbulent period. Furthermore, they clearly demonstrate Warburg’s embittered attitude towards some of his long-standing collaborators, whom he suspected of having denounced him to the Nazi authorities. In this paper, Warburg’s notes are fully transcribed and integrated into the historical context. Keywords: Otto Warburg, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Society, National Socialism, diary notes Schlüsselwörter: Otto Warburg, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft, Nationalsozialismus, Tagebuchnotizen | downloaded: 29.9.2021 Otto Warburg (1883–1970) ist in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte vor allem bekannt für seine bahnbrechenden Arbeiten zur Zellatmung, für die ihm 1931 der Nobelpreis verliehen wurde.1 In anderen Kontexten wiederum ist er bekannt als einer der ganz wenigen Wissenschaftler jüdischer Abstam- mung, die während der gesamten Zeit des Nationalsozialismus in Amt und Würden blieben: Nicht nur wurde Warburg nicht deportiert, er blieb bis 1945 Direktor des Kaiser-Wilhelm-Instituts (KWI) für Zellphysiologie in Berlin-Dahlem.2 Unter anderem stand er eigenen Angaben zufolge bis 1937 unter dem persönlichen Schutz von Friedrich Glum, damals Generaldirektor der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft (Werner 1991: 284). -
Basic Research in the Max Planck Society Science Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1945–1970
Chapter 5 Basic Research in the Max Planck Society Science Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1945–1970 Carola Sachse ላሌ The Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG, Max- Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften) is commonly consid- ered a stronghold of basic research in the German research landscape. When it was reestablished in 1948 in the Western zones of occupation, the society adopted the defi ning part of its predecessor’s name, the Kaiser Wilhelm So- ciety for the Advancement of Science (KWG, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften), which had been founded in 1911. In contrast to its organizational counterpart, the Fraunhofer Society for the Ad- vancement of Applied Research (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung), whose distinctive purpose has been incorporated into its name since its foundation in 1949 (Trischler and vom Bruch 1999), the MPG did not include the term “basic research” in its full name, nor does the term appear in any of its statutes of the last one hundred years. The offi - cial documents of the MPG instead refer to “scientifi c research” in the broad German sense of wissenschaftliche Forschung and combine it in varying formu- lations with the terms “freedom” and “independence.”1 Both of these terms are cornerstones in what became known as Harnack- Prinzip (Harnack principle). Named after Adolf von Harnack, the initiator and fi rst and longtime serving president of the KWG, this principle included two main aspects: fi rst, institutes should be founded only if a man was avail- able (women were not considered) for the post of managing director “who has This open access library edition is supported by the University of Bonn. -
Horst Kant (MLS)
Horst Kant Einsteins Weg nach Berlin Vortrag* auf der Sitzung der Klasse Naturwissenschaften und Technikwissenschaften der Leibniz-Sozietät am 12. November 2015 „100 Jahre Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie“ Nachfolgend soll als Einführung zum Kolloquium eine kurze Übersicht über Einsteins Leben und Wirken für den Zeitraum gegeben werden, der seine Anfänge in Berlin betrifft. Leider können die einzelnen Aspekte hier jeweils nur kurz angerissen und nicht vertieft werden; manches muß ganz wegbleiben. Fällt der Name Albert Einsteins (1879-1955), so bringt man ihn zumeist mit der Relativitätstheorie als seinem Hauptwerk in Verbindung und bezieht sich dabei auf das Jahr 1905, in dem seine Arbeit Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper in den Annalen der Physik erschien.1 Nur einen Tag nach Erscheinen am 26. September reichte er einen Nachtrag zu diesem Aufsatz ein, betitelt Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig? der implizit die Formel E = mc2 enthält,2 eine der wohl berühmtesten Formeln der Weltgeschichte. Der Inhalt beider Arbeiten zusammen wird heute als Spezielle Relativitätstheorie bezeichnet. Zugleich bezeichnet man das Jahr 1905 auch gern als Einsteins „Annus mirabilis“, denn in diesem Jahr erschienen von dem damaligen Mitarbeiter am Schweizer Patentamt in Bern noch zwei weitere gewichtige Artikel: eine Arbeit zum photoelektrischen Effekt, die die Lichtquantenhypothese enthält, und eine Arbeit zur Brownschen Molekularbe– wegung, die eine Bestätigung der Atomhypothese darstellt und als Erweiterung seiner Dissertation über die Bestimmung von Moleküldimensionen anzusehen ist, mit der er im Januar 1906 an der Universität Bern promoviert wurde. Die Leibniz-Sozietät hatte im März 2005 aus Anlaß jenes Jubiläums ein Kolloquium im Einstein-Saal der Archenhold- * Leicht erweiterte Vortragsfassung. -
One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research
Bretislav Friedrich · Dieter Hoffmann Jürgen Renn · Florian Schmaltz · Martin Wolf Editors One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences Bretislav Friedrich • Dieter Hoffmann Jürgen Renn • Florian Schmaltz Martin Wolf Editors One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences Editors Bretislav Friedrich Florian Schmaltz Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Max Planck Institute for the History of Society Science Berlin Berlin Germany Germany Dieter Hoffmann Martin Wolf Max Planck Institute for the History of Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Science Society Berlin Berlin Germany Germany Jürgen Renn Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Berlin Germany ISBN 978-3-319-51663-9 ISBN 978-3-319-51664-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51664-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017941064 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncom- mercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. -
Bulletin of the German Historical Institute Washington DC 44
Bulletin of the German Historical Institute 44 | Spring 2009 5 Preface FEATURES 9 The Natural Sciences and Democratic Practices: Albert Einstein, Fritz Haber, and Max Planck Margit Szöllösi-Janze 23 Comment on Margit Szöllösi-Janze’s “The Natural Sciences and Democratic Practices” Cathryn Carson 29 Gender, Sexuality, and Belonging: Female Homosexuality in Germany, 1890-1933 Marti M. Lybeck 43 The Peaceful Revolution of the Fall of 1989 Marianne Birthler 59 Human Dignity and the Freedom of the Press Jutta Limbach GHI RESEARCH 71 Billy Graham’s Crusades in the 1950s: Neo-Evangelicalism between Civil Religion, Media, and Consumerism Uta Andrea Balbier CONFERENCE REPORTS 83 Proto-Eugenic Thinking before Galton Christoph Irmscher 89 Nature’s Accountability: Aggregation and Governmentality in the History of Sustainability Sabine Höhler and Rafael Ziegler 95 Trajectories of Decolonization: Elites and the Transformation from the Colonial to the Postcolonial Sönke Kunkel 100 Symposium in Memoriam of Gerald D. Feldman Uwe Spiekermann 104 Terrorism and Modernity: Global Perspectives on Nineteenth Century Political Violence Roni Dorot and Daniel Monterescu 112 A Whole New Game: Expanding the Boundaries of the History of Sports Christopher Young 118 Decoding Modern Consumer Societies: Preliminary Results, Ongoing Research, and Future Agendas Uwe Spiekermann 123 Global Migration Systems of Domestic and Care Workers Anke Ortlepp 128 17th Annual Symposium of the Friends of the GHI and Award of the Fritz Stern Dissertation Prize Richard F. Wetzell 130 Engineering Society: The “Scientifi cation of the Social” in Comparative Perspective, 1880-1990 Jochen F. Mayer 137 Writing East German History: What Difference Does the Cultural Turn Make? Heather L. -
A Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cologne! Emil Fischer, Konrad Adenauer, and the Meirowsky Endowment** Lothar Jaenicke and Frieder W
Essays History of Science A Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cologne! Emil Fischer, Konrad Adenauer, and the Meirowsky Endowment** Lothar Jaenicke and Frieder W. Lichtenthaler* Dedicated to Professor Klaus Hafner on the occasion of his 75th Birthday Keywords: Emil Fischer ¥ history of science ¥ Kaiser Wilhelm Society The award of the Nobel Prize for In March 1914 the Senate of the KWI Chemistry to Emil Fischer (Figure 1, had decided to set up a KWI for left) just over 100 years ago,[1] which fell Physiology in Berlin-Dahlem,[10] for into the year of his 50th birthday, gave which Emil Fischer suggested his long- many a reason to pay tribute to the time collaborator, friend, and colleague personality and scientific legacy of one Emil Abderhalden, Professor of Physi- of the towering figures of our science.[2±5] ology at Halle University since 1908, However, it also presents the opportu- whom he held in high regard.[11] After nity to remember facets of his work negotiations throughout April 1914 Ab- other than his scientific achieve- derhalden had agreed to accept the ments.[6, 7] It was largely due to his appointment. In public relations and Figure 1. Left: Emil Fischer (around 1915), inspiration and untiring energy that the the art of obtaining industrial sponsor- right: Konrad Adenauer (in 1917). idea of research, free from teaching ship he was a thoroughly modern per- duties–which he always regarded as for that purpose, and which was realized son, otherwise a child of his time and the an obvious duty but with increasing poor in 1911 with the foundation of the Swiss countryside.[12] His research cen- health also as a burden–took shape in Kaiser Wilhelm Gesellschaft (KWG), tered around the chemistry and action of the form of institutes established solely financed through the sponsorship of protein degradation products which im- patrons. -
Science and Technology in the First World War Jörg Lehmann, Francesca Morselli
Science and Technology in the First World War Jörg Lehmann, Francesca Morselli To cite this version: Jörg Lehmann, Francesca Morselli. Science and Technology in the First World War: CENDARI Archival Research Guide. 2016, 10.13140/RG.2.2.12462.92488. hal-01419141 HAL Id: hal-01419141 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01419141 Submitted on 22 Dec 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR AUTHOR(S) Jörg Lehmann COLLABORATOR(S) Francesca Morselli THEMES World War I, Science, Innovation, International Research Institutions PERIOD 1909 - 1938 British Submarine ‘S’ Class CENDARI is funded by the European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme for Research © IWM (Q 67704), Imperial War Museum [IWM Non-Commercial Licence] This Archival Research Guide has the DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12462.92488 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 ABSTRACT Note of the Author 7 INTRODUCTION 8 MAJOR RESEARCH ISSUES Germany France Great Britain USA Russia Italy 25 BIBLIOGRAPHY 4 5 Science and Technology in the First World War CENDARI Archival Research Guide ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The subject “Science and Technology in the First World War” has so far been treated from The main outcome of the First World War with respect to Science and Technology was an the perspective on inventions and the development of new weapons, and often the focus unprecedented rationalization of production resulting from the new involvement of sci- has been on the topic of chemical warfare at the expense of other important dimensions. -
James, Steinhauser, Hoffmann, Friedrich One Hundred Years at The
James, Steinhauser, Hoffmann, Friedrich One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics Published under the auspices of the Board of Directors of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society: Hans-Joachim Freund Gerard Meijer Matthias Scheffler Robert Schlögl Martin Wolf Jeremiah James · Thomas Steinhauser · Dieter Hoffmann · Bretislav Friedrich One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics The Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society 1911–2011 De Gruyter An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Aut ho rs: Dr. Jeremiah James Prof. Dr. Dieter Hoffmann Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Institute for the Max Planck Society History of Science Faradayweg 4–6 Boltzmannstr. 22 14195 Berlin 14195 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Thomas Steinhauser Prof. Dr. Bretislav Friedrich Fritz Haber Institute of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society Max Planck Society Faradayweg 4–6 Faradayweg 4–6 14195 Berlin 14195 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Cover images: Front cover: Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, 1913. From left to right, “factory” building, main building, director’s villa, known today as Haber Villa. Back cover: Campus of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, 2011. The Institute’s his- toric buildings, contiguous with the “Röntgenbau” on their right, house the Departments of Physical Chemistry and Molecular Physics. -
Why Hitler Did Not Have Atomic Bombs
Article Why Hitler Did Not Have Atomic Bombs Manfred Popp Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Weberstr. 5, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany; [email protected] Abstract: In the 75 years since the end of World War II there is still no agreement on the answer to the question of why the presumed race between the USA and Nazi-Germany to build the atomic bomb did not take place. New insights and answers are derived from a detailed analysis of the most important document on the subject, the official report of a German army ordnance dated February 1942. This authoritative document has so far not been adequately analyzed. It has been overlooked, particularly that the goal of the Uranium Project was the demonstration of a self-sustaining chain reaction as a precondition for any future work on power reactors and an atomic bomb. This paper explores why Werner Heisenberg and his colleagues did not meet this goal and what prevented a bomb development program. Further evidence is derived from the research reports of the Uranium Project and from the Farm Hall transcripts. Additional conclusions can be drawn from the omission of experiments, which could have been possible and would have been mandatory if the atomic bomb would have been the aim of the program. Special consideration is given to the role of Heisenberg in the Uranium Project. Keywords: German uranium project; atomic bomb concepts; reactor experiments; US-German race for the atomic bomb; Werner Heisenberg 1. Introduction Albert Einstein’s fear that the national socialist regime in Germany would develop atomic bombs was the initial impetus for the Manhattan Project in the USA [1]. -
Janina Altman
Janina Altman Naturwissenschaftler vor und nach Hitlers Aufstieg zur Macht Aus dem Hebräischen von Inka Arroyo Antezana Inhalt Vorwort i-iii 1. Kapitel: Letzte Warnung 3 2. Kapitel: Weggang aus Deutschland 9 3. Kapitel: Autobiographie 15 4. Kapitel: Professur in Zürich 24 5. Kapitel: In Berlin 28 6. Kapitel: Zur Zeit des Ersten Weltkriegs 38 7. Kapitel: Professur in München 54 8. Kapitel: Die Revolution 65 9. Kapitel: Hitlers erste politische Schritte 83 10. Kapitel: Nach dem Krieg 89 11. Kapitel: Die Konsolidierung der schwarzen Kräfte 104 12. Kapitel: Der Rücktritt Willstätters 118 13. Kapitel: Die letzten Jahre der Weimarer Republik 127 14. Kapitel: Hitlers Machtübernahme 136 15. Kapitel: Die zweite Welle der ethnischen Säuberung an den Universitäten 150 16. Kapitel: Wielands Zufluchtsort 160 17. Kapitel: Nobelpreis und Deutscher Nationalpreis für Kunst und Wissenschaft 166 Epilog 171 Bibliographie 176 Anmerkungen 182 2 Erstes Kapitel Letzte Warnung Das Klingeln des Telefons durchbrach die Stille eines Morgens im November 1938. Professor Richard Willstätter saß an seinem Schreibtisch. Seine ganze Aufmerksamkeit galt den langen Zahlenkolonnen, den letzten Daten, die Dr. Margarete Rohdewald ihm gestern telefonisch durchgegeben hatte. Wer würde ihn zu dieser Stunde anrufen? Rohdewald pflegte in den Abendstunden anzurufen, nach der Arbeit, sie rief ihn nie morgens an. Seit vielen Monaten, oder genauer, seit Jahren, mit Beginn des Jahres 1933 störte nur eine kleine Handvoll Bekannter seine Ruhe, während er in völliger Abgeschiedenheit seines hübschen Hauses weilte, in einer der Nebenstraßen des Isarufers in München. Die einzigen, die ihn zu jeder Tages- und Nachtzeit stören konnten, waren seine Freunde Fritz Haber, Ferdinand Sauerbruch und Kasimir Fajans. -
Fritz Haber at One Hundred Fifty: Evolving Views of and on a German Jewish Patriot*
Fritz Haber at one hundred fifty: Evolving views of and on a German Jewish patriot* Bretislav Friedrich Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Faradayweg 4-6, D-14195 Berlin Prelude Only few scientists have conferred benefits to humankind – both intellectual and practical – that are on a par with those we owe Fritz Haber. And yet, Haber has been a controversial figure – for about the last third of those one hundred fifty years that elapsed since his birth in 1868. It was Haber’s role in World War One – most notably his initiative to usher in chemical warfare to the battlefield – that cast a long shadow over his legacy. The moral outrage elicited by the German chlorine cloud attack at Ypres on 22 April 1915 was immediate, but not long lasting: Within a few months of Ypres, the Entente deployed its own potent chemical arsenal and eventually declared, alongside with Germany, poison gas a “humane weapon” [Friedrich et al. 2017]. In the 1920s and early 1930s, Haber could even act, together with Albert Einstein and others, as ambassador of German science in Europe and America and actively participate in repairing the damage done to international cooperation by the “war of the intellects” [Wolff 2001, Wolff 2003, Berg und Thiel 2018] in general and the “chemists’ war” [Friedrich 2015] in particular. * An abridged version of this article was presented as a keynote address at “Fritz Haber im Fokus. Eine kritische Würdigung des umstrittenen Chemikers” held at the Centre for General and Cultural Studies, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, on 15 January 2019, cf. -
Redalyc.SCIENCE and IDEOLOGY the CASE of PHYSICS in NAZI
Mètode Science Studies Journal ISSN: 2174-3487 [email protected] Universitat de València España Ball, Philip SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY THE CASE OF PHYSICS IN NAZI GERMANY Mètode Science Studies Journal, núm. 7, 2017, pp. 69-77 Universitat de València Valencia, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511754472011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative MONOGRAPH Mètode Science StudieS Journal, 7 (2017): 69–77. University of Valencia. DOI: 10.7203/metode.7.7665 ISSN: 2174-3487. Article received: 14/12/2015, accepted: 17/02/2016. SCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY THE CASE OF PHYSICS IN NAZI GERMANY PHILIP BALL Science is not «above» politics and ethics: it is intrinsically political, and constantly raises ethical dilemmas. The consequences of evading such issues were made particularly clear in the actions of scientists working in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 40s. The accusation in 2006 that Dutch physicist Peter Debye was an opportunist who colluded with the Nazis reopened the debate about the conduct of physicists at that time. Here I consider what those events can tell us about the relationship of science and politics today. I argue that an insistence that science is an abstract, apolitical inquiry into nature is a myth that can leave it morally compromised and vulnerable to political manipulation. Keywords: Nazism, German physics, science and politics, Peter Debye. Science, it is often said, must be free from ideology.