Northern Docks Renaissance Urban Regeneration in the World Heritage Site of Liverpool

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Northern Docks Renaissance Urban Regeneration in the World Heritage Site of Liverpool Northern Docks Renaissance Urban regeneration in the World Heritage Site of Liverpool Fabián Andrés Lozano Palomino MA Urban Design Newcastle University Northern Docks Renaissance Urban regeneration in the World Heritage Site of Liverpool Fabián Andrés Lozano Palomino MA Urban Design Newcastle University Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 Contents: Page 1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Aims and objectives 3 2. Literature Review 4 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 The purpose of conservation 5 2.3 Historic development of urban conservation 6 2.4 Urban heritage: opportunity of confinement? 8 2.5 Tourism pressure and commodification of heritage 10 2.6 Case study: The historic centre of Vienna 12 2.7 Conclusion 14 16 3. Site Analysis 3.1 Context 17 3.2 Understanding the heritage of Liverpool 19 3.3 Character areas 27 3.4 Listed buildings and Landmarks 29 3.5 Land uses 31 3.6 Building form and figure - ground 32 3.7 Environmental quality 33 3.8 Movement and connections 34 3.9 Socioeconomics 36 37 4.Design principles 4.1 Vision 38 4.2 Principles 39 4.3 Concept diagram 41 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 4.4 Precedents 42 4.4.1 Porto Maravilha, Rio de Janeiro 42 4.4.2 Inner Harbour, Baltimore 43 4.4.3 Camden Lock, London 43 4.4.4 Paddington Basin, London 44 4.4.5 Ijburg Floating Village, Amsterdam 44 5. Project description 45 5.1 Character areas 47 5.2 Key Buildings and Landmarks 48 5.3 Transport connections 49 5.4 Land uses 50 5.5 Phasing 51 List of references 52 List of figures 54 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 1. Introduction 1 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 1.1 Introduction reputation that the city wants to leave behind. In this context is inscribed this design thesis, which seeks the regeneration “A city is a living, dynamic environment where cultural of the Northern Docks of the waterfront of Liverpool, in a heritage is part of a complexity of relationships.” sector that is part of the World Heritage Site of Maritime Orbasli, 2000 Mercantile City. Most of the cities in the world have growth from different layers of history. Rome is the example par-excellence, where the ruins from the ancient empire are juxtaposed with the renaissance and baroque buildings, which have also witnessed the different changes of the urban fabric though the centuries. Liverpool, although is not as old as Rome, has also experience important changes along its history, from the splendour of the Empire times, to the decline of the post- industrial era, which gave the to the city a not respectable 2 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 1.2 Aims and objectives The main objective of this Thesis is to project a proposal of ▪ To explore the opportunities of recovery that the site has, urban regeneration for the northern area of the Maritime with the purpose of formulating a master plan that Mercantile City of Liverpool, cataloged by UNESCO as rehabilitates and improves the urban conditions of the World Heritage Site in 2004 and which has been at risk since place. 2012. Other specific objectives are: ▪ To recognize the importance and significance of the architectural and urban heritage of Liverpool, understanding its relevance in the urban development of the city. ▪ To analyze the risks and threats that the place is currently facing, considering their causes and impact on the conservation of heritage. 3 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 2. Literature Review 4 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 2.1 Introduction commodification of the past will be discussed, examining the impact that they have on cities and especially on their The following literature review seeks to analyse the complex population. relationship between urban conservation ideas and contemporary development projects promoted in areas of 2.2 The purpose of conservation historical interest. In this framework, it will be examined first Historical areas constitute the representation of urban the question around the objective of urban conservation, memory of the cities. These places keep the material legacy which is considered as an important tool to preserve the of past times, which is manifested in buildings, monuments legacy of the past and transmit it to future generations. Then, and public spaces as symbols of a specific historical moment a briefly review about the historical development of in the urban development of cities (Wang, 2012). Defined in conservation policies emerged since the late nineteenth a similar way by UNESCO (2011): “historic urban areas are century, understanding the factors that led to its appearance among the most abundant and diverse manifestations of our and how they still influence today, analysing later the common cultural heritage, shaped by generations and benefits and difficulties that heritage protection tends to constituting a key testimony to humankind’s endeavours and generate in terms of urban development. Likewise, current aspirations through space and time…” global facts such as tourist overexploitation and 5 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 Considering the importance of historical urban areas as modernization processes were having on the old city was the tangible testimonies of the development of societies over Austrian architect Camillo Sitte, who established that the time, urban conservation is an instrument that allows the aesthetic values of historic centres are determined by the protection of this heritage and its subsequent pass to future relationship between buildings, monuments and public generations (Orbasli, 2000), preserving in this way, the spaces, which can not be understood as separate elements evidence of those cultural and aesthetic values that were the but as a coherent set within the urban fabric (LeGates, R., & expression of a specific period and that are part of the urban Stout, F. 2011; Siravo, 2011). identity of the city (Boussaa, 2017). Cities evolve from these Complementing the work begun by Sitte, in the early traditions and their current appearance is the result of that twentieth century the Scottish planner Patrick Geddes, who overlap through history (Koller, 2013). opposed the developments that involved the demolition of 2.3 The historic development of urban historic urban areas and proposed detailed and analytical studies of the pre-existing conditions of the site, involving all conservation affected stakeholders and seeking solutions through The conservation of heritage on an urban scale has been a concertation that allow protection of the heritage (Siravo, theme that began its development since the late nineteenth 2011). This controversy between the preservation of the century. One of the first theorists to reflect on the impact that historical legacy and the needs for modernization was also 6 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 addressed by Gustavo Giovannoni. In his publication Vecchie città ed edilizia nuova (1913), this Italian architect considers that the historical city is in itself a monument, even proposing the protection of the vernacular architecture that is part of this heritage (Veldpaus, Pereira & Colenbrander, 2013). The publication of the Athens Charter of 1931 marked an important advance in the management of heritage, being the Figure 1. Edinburgh, Scotland. Principles of Patrick Geddes were applied to the conservation of the old town. first document of international applicability in setting After two world wars that left an unprecedented destruction specific guidelines in relation to the preservation and in Europe, the reconstruction processes took different paths. restoration of historical monuments, as well as for the While cities such as Warsaw (Figure 2), devastated almost protection of the urban context where they are located entirely during the Second World War, were reconstructed (Rodwell, 2007). However, at the peak of the modern as faithfully as possible to its original state, others that movement and the postulates of CIAM, the historic city was suffered damage in smaller proportion decided to promote mostly considered as an object of renovation rather than more modern developments (Siravo, 2011). Beginning in the preservation (Veldpaus, Pereira & Colenbrander, 2013). 7 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 1960s, with the publication of the Venice Charter (1964) and the creation of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) in 1965, the conservation of urban heritage took a more comprehensive approach, through the formulation of strategies that allow a holistic management of historical centers, not only in their aesthetic dimension, but also in their socioeconomic dimension. (Veldpaus, Pereira & Figure 2. Old town of Warsaw, Poland. Colenbrander, 2013). In addition, the World Heritage Convention in 1972, the adoption of the European Charter of 2.4 Urban heritage: opportunity or the Architectural Heritage in 1975 and the Washington confinement? Charter in 1987 extended the spectrum of conservation Conservation of historic areas remains a subject of intense policies by adding the concept of sustainability and debate today. For several specialists there is a great adaptability to contemporary needs as a guarantee of potential in the old centres as sites for the development of preservation of the historical legacy to the following economic renewal projects, taking advantage of their generations (Rodwell, 2007, Orbasli, 2000). existing infrastructure and services, their high density and 8 Beneficiario COLFUTURO 2017 the concentration of jobs and the activities in an area rich in However, there are also less optimistic positions regarding their values aesthetic and landscape (Boeri, Gaspari, the benefits that conservation policies represent for cities. Gianfrate, Longo & Pussetti, 2016). This vision is Nasser (2003) argues that the immutable character of sites complemented by authors such as Carrion (2005), who declared as urban heritage is a factor that significantly argues that the historic centre, being a fundamental element conditions their long-term economic viability. This is in the urban structure and space of social integration of the because conservationist regulations are often a limitation for city, is an ideal platform to promote transformation the effective reuse of historic buildings, reducing the processes that continue to contribute to the construction of possibility of attracting new economic activities and thus urban identity.
Recommended publications
  • Liverpool Cruise Terminal
    Liverpool Cruise Terminal Information to inform a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Appropriate Assessment October 2019 Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited Merchants House, Wapping Road, Bristol BS1 4RW, United Kingdom www.watermangroup.com Client Name: Liverpool City Council Document Reference: WIE12464-100-11-3-2-AA Project Number: WIE12464-100 Quality Assurance – Approval Status This document has been prepared and checked in accordance with Waterman Group’s IMS (BS EN ISO 9001: 2008, BS EN ISO 14001: 2004 and BS OHSAS 18001:2007) Issue Date Prepared by Checked by Approved by 10-2-1-HRA November 2017 Niall Machin Simon Dowell Gavin Spowage Associate Director Senior Consultant Associate Director Comments: HRA to support planning application 10-4-1-HRA June 2018 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: HRA to support application for HRO and Marine Licence 11-2-3-AA January 2019 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: HRA and Appropriate Assessment to support application for HRO and Marine Licence 11-3-1-AA October 2019 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: Addressing Natural England consultation responses Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above.
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy River: Realising Energy Potential from the River Mersey
    The Energy River: Realising Energy Potential from the River Mersey June 2017 Amani Becker, Andy Plater Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZT Judith Wolf National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool L3 5DA This page has been intentionally left blank ii Acknowledgements The work herein has been funded jointly by the University of Liverpool’s Knowledge Exchange and Impact Voucher Scheme and Liverpool City Council. The contribution of those involved in the project through Liverpool City Council, Christine Darbyshire, and Liverpool City Region LEP, James Johnson and Mark Knowles, is gratefully acknowledged. The contribution of Michela de Dominicis of the National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool, for her work producing a tidal array scenario for the Mersey Estuary is also acknowledged. Thanks also to the following individuals approached during the timeframe of the project: John Eldridge (Cammell Laird), Jack Hardisty (University of Hull), Neil Johnson (Liverpool City Council) and Sue Kidd (University of Liverpool). iii This page has been intentionally left blank iv Executive summary This report has been commissioned by Liverpool City Council (LCC) and joint-funded through the University of Liverpool’s Knowledge Exchange and Impact Voucher Scheme to explore the potential to obtain renewable energy from the River Mersey using established and emerging technologies. The report presents an assessment of current academic literature and the latest industry reports to identify suitable technologies for generation of renewable energy from the Mersey Estuary, its surrounding docks and Liverpool Bay. It also contains a review of energy storage technologies that enable cost-effective use of renewable energy. The review is supplemented with case studies where technologies have been implemented elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for North Shore
    View from Lee - north to south Published September 2020 3 North Shore Vision I am pleased to introduce this North Shore Vision for the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site. Foreword Liverpool is a city that is undergoing a multi-billion pound renaissance and we are constantly seeking the right balance where regeneration and conservation can complement each other. We are proud of our unique heritage and have a desire to ensure that the city continues to thrive, with its historic legacy safeguarded and enhanced. On 17 July 2019, Liverpool City Council declared a Climate Change Emergency and I led a debate on the impending global ecological disaster, calling on all political parties to come together to rise to the challenge of making Liverpool a net zero carbon city by 2030. The way we do things in the future will need to change to a more sustainable model. To achieve this, the city has embraced the principles of the United Nations Development and this document sets out our ambitions for future growth and development for the North Shore area of the city firmly within this context. We have already begun work with partners to deliver that ambition. Existing and highly successful examples include the iconic Titanic Hotel redevelopment, restoration of the Tobacco Warehouse and the proposed refurbishment of the listed Engine House at Bramley Moore Dock which reinvigorate dilapidated heritage assets on the North Docks, providing access and interpretation to a new generation of people in the City. Liverpool has a well-earned reputation for being a city of firsts.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection List 2021.Xlsx
    AccNoPrefix No Description 1982 1 Shovel used at T Bolton and Sons Ltd. 1982 2 Shovel used at T Bolton and Sons Ltd STENCILLED SIGNAGE 1982 3 Telegraph key used at T Bolton and Sons Ltd 1982 4 Voltmeter used at T Bolton and Sons Ltd 1982 5 Resistor used at T Bolton and Sons Ltd 1982 6 Photograph of Copper Sulphate plant at T Bolton and Sons Ltd 1982 7 Stoneware Jar 9" x 6"dia marked 'Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd General Chemicals Division' 1982 8 Stoneware Jar 11" x 5"dia marked 'Cowburns Botanical Beverages Heely Street Wigan 1939' 1982 9 Glass Carboy for storing hydrochloric acid 1982 10 Bar of 'Bodyguard' soap Gossage and Sons Ltd Leeds 1982 11 Pack of Gossages Tap Water Softener and Bleacher 1982 12 Wall Map Business Map of Widnes 1904 1982 13 Glass Photo Plate Girl seated at machine tool 1982 14 Glass Photo Plate W J Bush and Co Exhibition stand 1982 15 Glass Photo Plate H T Watson Ltd Exhibition stand 1982 16 Glass Photo Plate Southerns Ltd Exhibition stand 1982 17 Glass Photo Plate Fisons Ltd Exhibition stand 1982 18 Glass Photo Plate Albright and Wilson Exhibition stand 1982 19 Glass Photo Plate General view of Exhibition 1982 20 Glass Photo Plate J H Dennis and Co Exhibition stand 1982 21 Glass Photo Plate Albright and Wilson Chemicals display 1982 22 Glass Photo Plate Widnes Foundry Exhibition stand 1982 23 Glass Photo Plate Thomas Bolton and Sons Exhibition stand 1982 24 Glass Photo Plate Albright and Wilson Exhibition stand 1982 25 Glass Photo Plate Albright and Wilson Exhibition stand 1982 26 Glass Photo Plate 6 men posed
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Dock Extensions at Liverpool with a General
    2 ELECTIOXS, ETC. [Minutes of Associate ilIembem-continued. JAXESDICEERSOW HUYPIDGE. l FI:A.NI~WALTER SCOTT, Jun., Stud. Inst. JAMESROUTLEDGE JACQUES. l C.E. CHARLESVEREKER LLOYD, A.K.C., ~ ALBIOXTIIOMAS SXELL. l Stud. Inst. C.E. TV.4LTER JOHNSTAYFORD, B.A., B.E. WALTEREDWAED MAY, Stud. Inst. C.E. i JOHXHODGSOX SUAI~T. CHARLESMURRAY, Stud. Inst. C.E. ALLANARCHIBALD CAMPBELL SWINTOX. HARRYPEKX, Stud. Inst. C.E. WILLIAXHEXRY THORPE. LESLIEHUNTER REYNOLDS. ARTHCR WILLIADISOS, Stud. InSt. C.E. LIOWELSALTXARSHE. GEORGEWYLIE, F.C.H. , Associate. Ncbjor LEAXDROCUBILLO. (Paper No. 2433.) Recent Dock Extensions at Liverpool, with a General Description of the MerseyDock Estate,the Port of Liverpool,and the RiverMersey.” By GEORGEFOSBERY LYSTER, M. Inst. C.E. THEspecial characteristics of theRiver Mersey, theimportant positionwhich Liverpool occupies among theleading trading centres of the world, and the rapid development of its commerce are, each and all, so interesting to engineers, that in submitting a Paper descriptive of the most recent dock extensions carried out in the port, the Author has been induced to touch upon each of these points, as a fitting preamble to the more formal and precise description of the special works which form the leading features of the Paper. Few, if any, localities, inthis country at all events, are so favourably situatedfor the construction of a comprehensive system of docks as that of Liverpool, not onlyby reason of its geographical position on the seaboard of the country, with its unrivalled water frontage, but also on account of its proximity to the great manu- faeturing districts, as well as to the coal and mineral fields of the North of England and Wales, with which it is linked by railways and canals, which aresuch important factors in thedevelopment and maintenance of successful trading.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping Safety Within the Port of Liverpool Adrian Jarvis
    Safe Home in Port? Shipping Safety within the Port of Liverpool Adrian Jarvis Introduction: Sources and Methods The issue of safety at sea has long exercised the minds of those who were concerned by what they perceived as irresponsible shipowners who sent their men to sea in dangerous vessels or with dangerous cargoes. Samuel Plimsoll is just the most famous among many who sought to bring to the shipping industry the sort of controls which already existed in many shore-based industries, and a number of Parliamentary enquiries investigated these questions in the nineteenth century.' Maritime historians have taken a good deal of interest in the answers, at both scholarly and more popular levels. Further down the scale comes the literature of spectacular shipwrecks, the worst examples of which are not merely voyeuristic or ghoulish but positively necrophiliac. What author of third-rate novels could improve on the real-life storyline of the Titanic? It raised issues of class and gender, of social, financial and technological hubris, and of heroism and neglect.' The common perception is that such tragic events invariably unfolded either in mid- ocean or on storm-battered rocky shores and in terms of bulk fatalities that perception is obviously correct. Its corollary, that one is safe in po rt, is not merely widely accepted but has extended to the use of the po rt as a metaphor for Heaven, with Jesus as celestial pilot and the Holy Trinity as the po rt authority.' This paper makes a rapid survey of the records of the Mersey Docks & Harbour Board (MD&HB), which shows that there obviously were accidents to ships when they were supposedly safe in po rt, that such accidents were numerous and that some of them were serious.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 0 LPC New WHS Vistagram 2 2008.Pdf
    4. George’s Dock Tunnel Ventilation Building 5. Memorial to Heroes of the Engine Room 6. Albert Dock Warehouses and Offices (Titanic Memorial) Opened 1846/7 1. Liver Building 2. Cunard Building 1931-1934 Circa 1916 Grade I 1908-11 1913-1916 3. Port of Liverpool Building Grade II Grade II Opened 1846-47 Albert Dock Warehouses form Listed Grade I Grade II* Completed 1907 This stylized obelisk, reminiscent of ancient The memorial was originally intended to be for the largest group of Grade1 Listed Buildings in The head offices of the Royal Liver Friendly This substantial building was built as the Grade II* Egypt, was designed by Sir Basil Mott and J. A. the engineers who stayed at their posts on England. Jesse Hartley used well-established Society were designed by Aubrey Thomas. It is offices of the Cunard Shipping Company to The domed head office of the Mersey Docks Brodie, with Herbert J. Rowse, to serve the 15th April 1912 when the Titanic sank. Its techniques adapted from textile mill methods. notable as one of Britain’s first multi-storey the designs of Willink and Thicknesse. Its and Harbour Board was designed by Briggs, Mersey Road Tunnel. dedication was broadened to include all He introduced new solutions, such as the reinforced concrete framed buildings. proportions give it the form of an Italian Wolstenholme and Thorneley in 1901. It has statues of Night and Day, symbols of the maritime engine room fatalities incurred amazing stressed-skin iron roof. Raising of The clock towers are mounted with copper palazzo. The sculptural portraits of races from Features include cast iron gates and gate piers never-closing Mersey Tunnel and a black during the performance of duty.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpoo'l World Heritage Waterfront
    Albert Dock – Albert Dock and its warehouses were opened in 1846 by Prince Albert. They were designed by Jesse Hartley, the dock engineer with assistance from the architect Philip Hardwick. The dock was one of the earliest enclosed docks in the world and it is believed to form the largest group of Grade 1 Listed Buildings in England. The use and condition of the dock and warehouses declined during the 20th century, but they were comprehensively restored and converted to a mix of uses in the 1980s. They are now the most popular non- paying visitor attraction in the North West. IHBC Summer School Saturday 16th June 2007 Stanley Dock – Stanley Dock was opened in 1848 and between 1852-55 it was equipped with import warehouses of fire-proof construction similar to those at Albert Dock, all to the de- Tour signs of Jesse Hartley, the dock engineer. In 1901, the dock was partly infilled and Stanley Dock Tobacco Warehouse was constructed, using over 27 million bricks. It is believed to be the largest brick building in the world. The whole complex is disused, apart from the ground Liverpool’s World Heritage Waterfront floor of two of the warehouses, where a market is held every Sunday. Discussions are under- way with the owners to try to find a sustainable use for the buildings. Sponsored by Institute of Historic Building Conservation Summer School June 2007 World Heritage Waterfront 2.00 pm Coach leaves Liverpool Medical Institute. 2.15 pm Tate and Lyle Sugar Silo 2.20 pm Tall ships at Wellington Dock 2.25 pm Get out of coach at Stanley Dock
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Docks Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    LIVERPOOL DOCKS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michael Stammers | 128 pages | 01 Jan 2004 | The History Press Ltd | 9780752417127 | English | Stroud, United Kingdom Liverpool Docks PDF Book Other european emigrants sailed from le havre. George's Dock [8]. At Port of Liverpool we are committed to helping power the nation. The care and safety of our people and your cargo both depend on it. Hydrographic Information. Then follow the signs for All Docks into the Maritime Centre. Published 28 May Meanwhile, support is growing for a new British slavery museum in the capital after the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, backed the proposal, arguing that it would help to tackle racism. Liverpool docks were once filled with the sound of horses' hooves, the commotion of emigrants leaving for a new life and the din of stevedores loading heavy goods on to vessels bound for the atlantic. At Port of Liverpool, when it comes to containers, we tick all the right boxes for our customers. Category Commons. Of course we load, unload and store their goods in the safest, most efficient, most cost-effective way. With all containers converging on ports to be loaded on ships, terminals have been suggested as the most logical point in the supply chain to weigh boxes. LTI14 - Svitzer Amazonas. Liverpool's super port. Shop from the world's largest selection and best deals for liverpool single collectable english postcards. Port of Liverpool docks. According to tripadvisor travellers, these are the best ways to experience royal albert dock liverpool. LTI09 - Svitzer Stanlow. Architectural Review. Sometimes we go a whole lot further.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Supporting Habitat Liverpool Docks Aug 2015
    Assessment of Supporting Habitat (Docks) for Use by Qualifying Features of Natura 2000 Sites in the Liverpool City Region Ornithology Report Report Ref: 4157.005 August 2015 Assessment of Supporting Habitat (Docks) for Use by Qualifying Features of Natura 2000 Sites in the Liverpool City Region Ornithology Report Document Reference: 4157.005 Version 3.0 August 2015 Prepared by: TEP Genesis Centre Birchwood Science Park Warrington WA3 7BH Tel: 01925 844004 Fax: 01925 844002 e-mail: [email protected] for: Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service First floor Merton House Stanley Road Bootle Merseyside L20 3DL Written: Checked: Approved: MW TR TR CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SURVEY METHODS .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SUMMARY SURVEY FINDINGS ............................................................................ 17 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 82 6.0 DISCUSSION OF IMPLICATIONS RELATING TO NATURA 2000 SITES.............. 83 7.0 REFERENCES & FURTHER READING ................................................................. 86 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Examples of Survey Sheets Appendix 2: Vantage Point Survey Coverage Appendix 3: Tabulated Raw Data Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Dock: What Part in Liverpool's Continuing Renaissance?
    | 1 Albert Dock: What Part in Liverpool's Continuing Renaissance? Professor Michael Parkinson CBE and Dr Alex Lord ALBERT DOCK: WHAT PART IN LIVERPOOL’S CONTINUING RENAISSANCE? WELCOME | 3 Remember Albert Dock in 1979. Rotting, derelict, toxic, 600 acres written off. Look at it today. The site itself is transformed. The city is transformed. The lesson of the Dock from 1979 is that what matters is the person and the people in charge. Lord Michael Heseltine ALBERT DOCK: WHAT PART IN LIVERPOOL’S CONTINUING RENAISSANCE? FOREWORD | 5 Contents Chapter 1 . 7 What does this report do, how and why? I am very pleased to introduce the Heseltine Chapter 2. 10 Institute’s review of Albert Dock. How did we get to here? A nano history of Albert Dock As the authors say, the Dock is an iconic symbol of both Liverpool’s history and its renaissance – Chapter 3. 14 it is emblematic of the city’s social, economic How did the Dock renaissance begin? and cultural power. The work of the Merseyside Development Corporation 1981-1997 Speaking on behalf of the University of Liverpool I am determined that our talented staff and Chapter 4. 17 students will play a central role in supporting the Where does Albert Dock stand now? development of the city region. The University is an anchor institution in the North West, and our Chapter 5. 29 performance and reputation are intimately linked How do we build on Albert’s success across the wider to our location. Liverpool waterfront and city region? This report demonstrates the powerful contribution that the Heseltine Institute can make in shaping Appendix: Interviewees 34 future development in the city region.
    [Show full text]
  • Whs-Spd-Lowres
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document Adopted October 2009 Foreword Foreword by Peter Millea, Executive Member for Regeneration and John Kelly, Executive Director Regeneration This Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) for the World Heritage Site (WHS) is issued following extensive public consultation by Liverpool City Council. The City Council and partners have noted the representations made by many that the WHS should contribute to the regeneration, visitor economy and local sense of civic pride in Liverpool, over coming months and years. The City Council will therefore commit more resources to promotion and interpretation of the WHS to ensure that its unique cultural heritage is fully utilised, as well as being properly conserved. The purpose of the SPD is to provide a planning framework for development which will enhance the city’s heritage and boost investment, tourism and regeneration. Above all, it is intended as a policy document which will encourage economic regeneration with an emphasis on quality. It is part of an emerging statutory development framework for the city which will outline more specific guidance on land allocations to prioritise target areas for economic growth for the whole city, including the World Heritage Site and areas bordering on it. The SPD includes important principles about World Heritage Site management in the longer term, with the emphasis on preserving and enhancing Liverpool’s outstanding universal value and the quality of its public realm. However, it is being issued at a time when the global and UK economy is contracting and a main priority for the City Council is the city’s continuing economic regeneration.
    [Show full text]