DOCSLIB.ORG

Everton Stadium Development Limited the People's Project Bramley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Everton Stadium Development Limited the People's Project Bramley Everton Stadium Development Limited The People’s Project Bramley-Moore Dock, Liverpool Heritage Statement December 2019 Everton Stadium Development Limited, Bramley-Moore Dock : Heritage Statement Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Authorship ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Site Description and Context ............................................................................................................. 5 Liverpool Waters (Future Baseline) ............................................................................................... 6 Bramley-Moore Dock .................................................................................................................. 7 3 Application Proposals / Pre-Application Consultation ................................................................... 10 4 The legislative, policy and guidance context ................................................................................... 12 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 12 The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 ............................................ 12 Statutory Development Plan ....................................................................................................... 12 World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document .......................................................... 15 National Planning Policy Framework .......................................................................................... 18 Proposals affecting heritage assets ........................................................................................... 19 Considering potential impacts ................................................................................................... 19 Planning Practice Guidance ......................................................................................................... 21 Historic England’s Good Practice Advice in Planning Notes (GPAs) ........................................... 21 Historic England guidance on the setting of heritage assets (GPA 3) ......................................... 22 Historic England guidance on conservation areas (HEAN 1) ....................................................... 22 Historic England tall building guidance (HEAN 4) ........................................................................ 23 5 The background and history of Bramley-Moore Dock and its surroundings ................................. 25 History .......................................................................................................................................... 25 Liverpool – Beginnings of a World City ..................................................................................... 25 Nineteenth Century – The Age of Jesse Hartley ....................................................................... 28 Stanley Dock Conservation Area – A Brief History of the Statutorily Listed Heritage Assets ..... 41 6 Bramley-Moore Dock ....................................................................................................................... 53 7 The heritage significance of the site and its context ....................................................................... 64 The heritage context of Bramley-Moore Dock ............................................................................ 64 The heritage significance of the site and its context – Introduction ............................................ 64 The relevant heritage assets ..................................................................................................... 64 Assessing heritage significance ................................................................................................ 65 ‘Historic interest’, ‘Historical value’ and ‘Evidential value’ ........................................................ 66 ‘Architectural interest’, ‘artistic interest’ or ‘aesthetic value’ ................................................. 69 The Heritage Assets ...................................................................................................................... 70 Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site ......................................................... 70 Attributes of the Mercantile City .................................................................................................. 72 Bramley-Moore Dock Retaining Walls – Grade II ..................................................................... 72 Regent Road Dock Wall (Dock Wall from opposite Sandhills Lane to Collingwood Dock with entrances) – Grade II ................................................................................................................. 73 The Hydraulic Engine House – Grade II ..................................................................................... 74 Collingwood Dock, Salisbury Dock & Nelson Dock Retaining Walls – Grade II ....................... 74 Clarence Graving Dock – Grade II ............................................................................................. 75 Stanley Dock – unlisted ............................................................................................................. 75 Leeds-Liverpool Canal, Stanley Locks – Grade II ....................................................................... 75 Stanley Dock Warehouse (North side of Stanley Dock) – Grade II* ......................................... 77 Page 1 Everton Stadium Development Limited, Bramley-Moore Dock : Heritage Statement Hydraulic Tower to west of former North Warehouse at Stanley Dock – Grade II ................. 77 Stanley Dock Warehouse (south of Tobacco Warehouse – Grade II ........................................ 77 Stanley Dock Entrances – Grade II ............................................................................................ 78 Tobacco Warehouse – Grade II ................................................................................................. 78 Bonded Tea Warehouse – Grade II ........................................................................................... 79 Victoria Clock Tower – Grade II ................................................................................................. 79 Dock Master’s Office, Salisbury Dock – Grade II ....................................................................... 79 Sea Wall – unlisted .................................................................................................................... 80 Stanley Dock Conservation Area ............................................................................................... 80 Other Heritage Assets ............................................................................................................... 82 8 The proposed scheme and its effect ................................................................................................. 83 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 83 Cumulative Assessment ............................................................................................................. 83 The permitted Liverpool Waters Masterplan .............................................................................. 84 The Proposed Scheme – Design Interventions ............................................................................ 85 Bramley-Moore Dock Retaining Walls ........................................................................................ 86 Regent Road Dock Wall ................................................................................................................ 88 The Impact of the Stadium ........................................................................................................ 89 The Hydraulic Engine House ........................................................................................................ 89 Other Listed Buildings .................................................................................................................. 91 Collingwood Dock, Salisbury Dock, Nelson Dock & Clarence Graving Dock ............................... 91 Leeds-Liverpool Canal listed structures .................................................................................... 92 Stanley Dock Warehouses (north of Stanley Dock) .................................................................. 93 Stanley Dock Warehouse (south of Tobacco Warehouse) ....................................................... 93 Hydraulic Tower to west of former North Warehouse at Stanley Dock .................................. 94 Stanley Dock Entrances ............................................................................................................. 94 Tobacco Warehouse .................................................................................................................. 95 Bonded Tea Warehouse ............................................................................................................ 96 Victoria Clock Tower
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MANN ISLAND, Liverpool Merseyside
    MANN ISLAND, Liverpool Merseyside Archaeological Excavation Report Oxford Archaeology North March 2012 Countryside Neptune llp Issue No: 2011-12/1243 OA North Job: L10312 NGR: SJ 3403 9008 Mann Island, Merseyside: Archaeological Excavation Report 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Circumstances of the Project .............................................................................................. 7 1.2 Site Location, Topography and Geology............................................................................. 8 1.3 Previous Work.................................................................................................................... 8 2. METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 Project Design.................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Excavation and Watching Brief .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • No 12 PRINCES DOCK
    No 12 PRINCES DOCK Ground Floor Suite B 2,880 sq ft (267.5 sq m) LIVERPOOL 6 million workforce Wages are 10% lower than 2 major airports within within an hour national average and 50% 45 minutes’ drive The Liverpool City Region is attracting lower than City of London inward investment and international business. With new restaurants, bars and £10billion investment Catchment of 13 universities 2 hrs to London by train legendary nightlife, alongside waterfront planned in the City Region and over 213,000 students and cultural attractions, this is a place where people want to live, work and play. Benefiting from beautiful coastline and Largest collection of museums GVA to double to 500,000 businesses countryside, quality of life matters here. & galleries outside of London £1.75billion by 2030 within 1 hour of City Centre 13 Universities World-class entertainment Liverpool John Lennon Airport LIVERPOOL WATERS With an estimated value of £5 billion, Liverpool Waters is one of the largest regeneration projects within Europe and the largest single development opportunity in the city. Covering some 60 hectares and spanning 2.3 km of the city’s famous waterfront, Liverpool Waters will see the creation of a new mixed-use city district for Liverpool and bring back to life a swathe of historic dockland. Cruise Liner Terminal Central Park Proposed Everton Stadium Isle of Man Ferry Terminal Central Park LIVERPOOL 24 WATERS 23 11 25 5 27 31 35 30 29 34 33 13 32 6 37 8 1 16 12 14 28 9 20 4 36 42 3 45 7 44 10 43 2 41 39 46 15 19 22 17 21 18 40 38 26 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORT LEISURE ATTRACTIONS RESIDENTIAL FOOD AND DRINK AMENITIES 1 No.
    [Show full text]
  • MAIB Report No 32/2014
    ACCIDENT REPORT ACCIDENT sinking oftheDUKW andabandonment amphibiouspassenger VERY SERIOUS MARINE CASUALTY REPORT NO CASUALTY SERIOUS MARINE VERY fire and abandonment of the DUKW amphibious passenger oftheDUKW andabandonment fire amphibiouspassenger Combined report on the investigations ofthe reportCombined ontheinvestigations on the River Thames, London Thames, on theRiver in Salthouse Dock, Liverpool H Wacker Quacker 1 Quacker Wacker on 29 September 2013 on 29September NC on 15June2013 A Cleopatra R and the vehicle vehicle N B IO T A G TI S 32 /2014 DECEMBER 2014 INVE T DEN I C C A NE RI A M Extract from The United Kingdom Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012 – Regulation 5: “The sole objective of the investigation of an accident under the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012 shall be the prevention of future accidents through the ascertainment of its causes and circumstances. It shall not be the purpose of an investigation to determine liability nor, except so far as is necessary to achieve its objective, to apportion blame.” NOTE This report is not written with litigation in mind and, pursuant to Regulation 14(14) of the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012, shall be inadmissible in any judicial proceedings whose purpose, or one of whose purposes is to attribute or apportion liability or blame. © Crown copyright, 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 11797 Mersey Gateway Regeneration Map Plus[Proof]
    IMPACT AREAS SUMMARY MERSEY GATEWAY 1 West Runcorn Employment Growth Area 6 Southern Widnes 8 Runcorn Old Town Centre plus Gorsey Point LCR Growth Sector Focus: Advanced Manufacturing LCR Growth Sector Focus: Advanced Manufacturing / LCR Growth Sector Focus: Visitor Economy / Financial & Widnes REGENERATION PLAN / Low Carbon Energy Financial & Professional Services Professional Services Waterfront New & Renewed Employment Land: 82 Hectares New & Renewed Employment Land: 12 Hectares New & Renewed Employment Land: 6.3 Hectares Link Key Sites: New Homes: 215 New Homes: 530 • 22 Ha Port Of Runcorn Expansion Land Key Sites: Key Sites: Everite Road Widnes Gorsey Point • 20 Ha Port Of Weston • 5 Ha Moor Lane Roadside Commercial Frontage • Runcorn Station Quarter, 4Ha Mixed Use Retail Employment Gyratory • 30 Ha+ INOVYN World Class Chemical & Energy • 3 Ha Moor Lane / Victoria Road Housing Opportunity Area & Commercial Development Renewal Area Remodelling Hub - Serviced Plots • 4 Ha Ditton Road East Employment Renewal Area • Runcorn Old Town Centre Retail, Leisure & Connectivity Opportunities: Connectivity Opportunities: Commercial Opportunities Widnes Golf Academy 5 • Weston Point Expressway Reconfiguration • Silver Jubilee Bridge Sustainable Transport • Old Town Catchment Residential Opportunities • Rail Freight Connectivity & Sidings Corridor (Victoria Road section) Connectivity Opportunities: 6 • Moor Lane Street Scene Enhancement • Runcorn Station Multi-Modal Passenger 3MG Phase 3 West Widnes Halton Lea Healthy New Town Transport Hub & Improved
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Cruise Terminal
    Liverpool Cruise Terminal Information to inform a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Appropriate Assessment October 2019 Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited Merchants House, Wapping Road, Bristol BS1 4RW, United Kingdom www.watermangroup.com Client Name: Liverpool City Council Document Reference: WIE12464-100-11-3-2-AA Project Number: WIE12464-100 Quality Assurance – Approval Status This document has been prepared and checked in accordance with Waterman Group’s IMS (BS EN ISO 9001: 2008, BS EN ISO 14001: 2004 and BS OHSAS 18001:2007) Issue Date Prepared by Checked by Approved by 10-2-1-HRA November 2017 Niall Machin Simon Dowell Gavin Spowage Associate Director Senior Consultant Associate Director Comments: HRA to support planning application 10-4-1-HRA June 2018 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: HRA to support application for HRO and Marine Licence 11-2-3-AA January 2019 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: HRA and Appropriate Assessment to support application for HRO and Marine Licence 11-3-1-AA October 2019 Niall Machin Gavin Spowage Gavin Spowage Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director Comments: Addressing Natural England consultation responses Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above.
    [Show full text]
  • SCOPING OPINION Proposed Alexandra Dock Renewable Energy
    SCOPING OPINION Proposed Alexandra Dock Renewable Energy Project September 2012 Scoping Opinion for Alexandra Dock Renewable Energy Project CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................... 1 2.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................ 4 3.0 EIA APPROACH AND TOPIC AREAS ..................................... 16 4.0 OTHER INFORMATION ........................................................ 29 APPENDIX 1 – LIST OF CONSULTEES APPENDIX 2 – RESPONDENTS TO CONSULTATION AND COPIES OF REPLIES APPENDIX 3 – PRESENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Scoping Opinion for Alexandra Dock Renewable Energy Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the Scoping Opinion (the Opinion) provided by the Secretary of State in respect of the content of the Environmental Statement for Alexandra Dock Renewable Energy Project located within Hornby Dock in the Port of Liverpool. The proposed development would have a generating capacity of 150MWe of electricity and would combust approximately 1,200,000 tonnes of biomass per annum. This report sets out the Secretary of State’s opinion on the basis of the information provided in RES UK & Ireland Ltd’s report entitled ‘Alexandra Dock Renewable Energy Project Environmental Scoping Report’ (August 2012). The Opinion can only reflect the proposals as currently described by the Applicant. The Secretary of State has consulted on the Scoping Report and the responses received have been taken into account in adopting this Opinion. The Secretary of State is satisfied that the topic areas identified in the Scoping Report encompass those matters identified in Schedule 4, Part 1, paragraph 19 of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as amended). The Secretary of State draws attention both to the general points and those made in respect of each of the specialist topic areas in this Opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Graving Dock Infill: Non Technical Summary
    REPORT Canada Graving Dock Infill: Non- Technical Summary In support of Environmental Permit Application Client: Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Limited Reference: PB9683-RHD-ZZ-XX-TN-Z-0008 Status: S0/P01.01 Date: 22 July 2020 Project related HASKONINGDHV UK LTD. Honeycomb Edmund Street Liverpool L3 9NG United Kingdom Industry & Buildings VAT registration number: 792428892 +44 151 2362944 T +44 151 2272561 F [email protected] E royalhaskoningdhv.com W Document title: Canada Graving Dock Infill: Non-Technical Summary Document short title: Reference: PB9683-RHD-ZZ-XX-TN-Z-0008 Status: P01.01/S0 Date: 22 July 2020 Project name: Canada Graving Dock Infill Project number: PB9683 Author(s): Elspeth Harris Drafted by: Elspeth Harris Checked by: Matt Simpson Date / initials: Approved by: Matt Simpson Date / initials: Classification Project related Disclaimer No part of these specifications/printed matter may be reproduced and/or published by print, photocopy, microfilm or by any other means, without the prior written permission of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.; nor may they be used, without such permission, for any purposes other than that for which they were produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no responsibility or liability for these specifications/printed matter to any party other than the persons by whom it was commissioned and as concluded under that Appointment. The integrated QHSE management system of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. has been certified in accordance with ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018. 22 July 2020 PB9683-RHD-ZZ-XX-TN-Z-0008
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Historic Settlement Study
    Liverpool Historic Settlement Study Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project December 2011 Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project Museum of Liverpool Pier Head Liverpool L3 1DG © Trustees of National Museums Liverpool and English Heritage 2011 Contents Introduction to Historic Settlement Study..................................................................1 Aigburth....................................................................................................................4 Allerton.....................................................................................................................7 Anfield.................................................................................................................... 10 Broadgreen ............................................................................................................ 12 Childwall................................................................................................................. 14 Clubmoor ............................................................................................................... 16 Croxteth Park ......................................................................................................... 18 Dovecot.................................................................................................................. 20 Everton................................................................................................................... 22 Fairfield .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Barrowmore Model Railway Journal
    r------------- -------------- -------------- ---- ISSN 1745-9842 Barrowmore Model Railway Journal _,a:.~~~ ~""'- -~ s-:-:- :: ~_.- ~-: -= -- .;-·: •.:=... Nnmber6 March2006 Published on behalf ofBarrowmore Model Railway Group by the Honorary Editor: David Goodwin, "Cromer", Church Road, Saugball, Chester CHI 6EN; tel. 01244 880018. E-mail: [email protected] Contributions are welcome: (a) as e-mails or e-mail attachments; (b) as a 3.Sin floppy disk, formatted in any way (as long as you tell me ifit's unusual!); disks can be provided on request; ( c) a typed manuscript; (d) a hand-written manuscript, preferably with a contact telephone number so that any queries can be sorted out; (e) aCD. Any queries to the Editor, please. The NEXT ISSUE will be dated June 2006, and contributions should get to the Editor as soon as possible, but ai least before 1 May 2006. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Copies of this magazine are also available to non-members: a cheque for £5 (pPw:ihle to ~Barrowmore Model Railway Group') will provide the next four issues, posted drrect to your home. Send your details and cheque to the Editor at the above address. 111111I1111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111+ The cover illustration for this issue was drawn by Eric Power, and is based on a photograph of the Cheshire Lines signal box at Mickle Trafford, taken by enthusiast Arthur Willis in 1969, just before this cabin and the nearby L.N.W.R. one were closed. The replacement box was shown on page 39 of our December 2005 issue. The The LNER Study Group was founded in 1965 to collect and make available accurate information about the LNER and its constituents.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for North Shore
    View from Lee - north to south Published September 2020 3 North Shore Vision I am pleased to introduce this North Shore Vision for the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site. Foreword Liverpool is a city that is undergoing a multi-billion pound renaissance and we are constantly seeking the right balance where regeneration and conservation can complement each other. We are proud of our unique heritage and have a desire to ensure that the city continues to thrive, with its historic legacy safeguarded and enhanced. On 17 July 2019, Liverpool City Council declared a Climate Change Emergency and I led a debate on the impending global ecological disaster, calling on all political parties to come together to rise to the challenge of making Liverpool a net zero carbon city by 2030. The way we do things in the future will need to change to a more sustainable model. To achieve this, the city has embraced the principles of the United Nations Development and this document sets out our ambitions for future growth and development for the North Shore area of the city firmly within this context. We have already begun work with partners to deliver that ambition. Existing and highly successful examples include the iconic Titanic Hotel redevelopment, restoration of the Tobacco Warehouse and the proposed refurbishment of the listed Engine House at Bramley Moore Dock which reinvigorate dilapidated heritage assets on the North Docks, providing access and interpretation to a new generation of people in the City. Liverpool has a well-earned reputation for being a city of firsts.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Atlantic (Ocean) Gateway to Executive on 11 March 2009
    Manchester City Council Item16 Executive 11 March 2009 Manchester City Council Report for Resolution Report To: Executive – 11th March 2009 Subject: Atlantic (Ocean) Gateway Report of: The Chief Executive Summary This report seeks to inform Members about an initiative, initially by Peel Holdings, which has potential implications for the economic growth of the city region. Recommendations That Executive:- (a) Acknowledge that there maybe some opportunities arising as a result of the Atlantic Gateway concept which have the potential to support the Manchester City Region Growth agenda (b) Agree that these opportunities need to be explored and evidenced in the context of the emerging Regional Strategy (c) Agree that the Council cannot support Atlantic Gateway as a concept of growth until more detailed evidence is made available and the concept is better defined and understood (d) Agree that, in close collaboration with other AGMA Authorities, the Council stands prepared to work constructively with Government Office, the NWDA and other agencies to develop an evidential base to ensure that the concept is appropriately defined, and bring forward aspects of the overall concept which promote and complement city region regeneration priorities. (e) Urge the NWDA to commission an economic, environmental and social cost benefit analysis of the concept and emerging proposals to: • maximise long-term sustainable economic growth • understand the impacts (positive and negative) that the pursuit of the concept could have on the abilities of the city-regions to drive overall regional growth • assist in ensuring public investment/intervention is better aligned and appropriately targeted (f) Request that Officers report back to this Executive on progress on these matters at relevant times.
    [Show full text]
  • Superport Action Plan Delivering Economic Growth
    SuperPort Action Plan Delivering Economic Growth 2011-2020 Contents SuperPort Executive Committee Members Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 03 The Liverpool City Region SuperPort Committee is a private sector led The opportunities for Built on its history as a great maritime trading stimulate economic growth and job group established to drive forward SuperPort to deliver business growth SuperPort are global centre; Liverpool City Region’s ports, airport, creation and raise the profile of the CREATING A SUPERPORT IN 04 and job creation. road, rail and logistics assets, together provide City Region as a gateway of international LIVERPOOL CITY REGION and can transform an established economic driver. stature. These projects include the the economy of development of a deep-water EXISTING ASSETS & CAPABILITIES 06 New, lucrative markets are emerging from Post Panamax in-river terminal at the Liverpool City Region. Brazil to China and from Russia to India. Port of Liverpool and the expansion of LIVERPOOL CITY REGION’S 12 Technological advances such as widening 3MG, the Multimodal Gateway operated POTENTIAL the Panama Canal to accommodate the as a partnership between Stobart Group, world’s largest vessels are opening up Prologis and Halton Borough Council. WHERE GROWTH WILL COME FROM 14 new trade routes. Economic analysis by AMION Consulting Peter Nears Steve O’Connor Joe Przeworski Jim Teasdale POTENTIAL CHALLENGES 16 SuperPort Committee SuperPort Committee Ineos Chlor Limited Mersey Maritime Businesses are placing increasing emphasis (p14), based on available trend and TO OVERCOME Chair Deputy Chair Group on moving people and freight both at the capital investment project intelligence, Peel Holdings Stobart Ports (Management) Ltd lowest possible cost and at the lowest has forecast the potential for over 21,000 ACTIONS TO MEET THE TARGETS 18 possible carbon output.
    [Show full text]