Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction Introduction This is a follow-up to my previous compilation of pro-independence articles and arguments (which can be found here). When I finished the last one, I wasn’t sure if I should or need to follow up with a second one, however, so many more articles have came out supporting independence that i thought it worthwhile creating a follow-up. The last compilation contained references up to the 24th June and this now contains references from the 25th June to around 5th September. At the time I started writing this new one, 4 weeks after I finished the last one, I had accumulated over 250 references and by the time I had finished, there were at least 800 references and 500 images! Unfortunately this has pushed the number of pages past 300, which I know is a huge amount to read in the closing weeks of the campaign (more than twice the first document) but if you can read it all, it’ll be worth it. Otherwise, dip into it and use it as a reference. By necessity, this will almost certainly be the last document I write on this subject – there are and will be many articles from both sides right up to the day of the referendum that will be relevant so please keep an eye out for them (Facebook is good for being alerted to these). However, the majority will only reinforce the arguments presented in this document (and even then this document only reinforces what was presented in the last one). As a result of the looming deadline, this compilation is likely to be a bit more rough around the edges as I wanted to finish it 2 weeks before the referendum to give time to read it. As before, I would recommend you follow each link and read the articles in full but I appreciate that this may take more than the 2 weeks left to do! This compilation does not contain the references of the last one (not deliberately) – it’s a separate follow-up and should be read in addition to the last one, if you’ve not already read it (the article “Scottish Independence”). I’ve tried to maintain the same headings as before to be as consistent with the previous compilation but some have been omitted and some added. I hope you’ll also find this one useful and that it persuades you to consider voting for Scotland’s future as an independent nation. Thanks for reading and good luck! - 1 - The Independence Argument There are many claims being made about the referendum, some deliberately made to try and cloud the debate as to what the question really is. What does it boil down to? While economics, etc influence the decision, the core question is, as discussed here, whether those who live and work in Scotland – those who contribute to it and depend on it – are those who ought to have the governing say in who runs the place. These are the electorate both for the future and for the current campaign. These are the people we say are “sovereign” – to be entrusted now and in future with our political decision making. That is, we say that : - a) Scotland constitutes a “polity”, a political entity, and that b) democracy is in principle and practice the best way to run a polity. Therefore c) we ought to have an elected parliament in Edinburgh that can actually take the decisions on taxation and welfare and war and peace that the parliament of any other, “normal” political entity should expect to do. If you accept that Scotland is a real country, and that democracy is the best (least worst) form of government, then, within that definition, a Yes vote is logically the inescapable choice to make. To vote No on September the 18th you have to contend either that Scotland does NOT constitute a polity or that democracy is too good for it. Or as someone else described it in a Facebook discussion: Please answer the following two questions with a simple Yes or No. 1. Do you believe that a country should run its own affairs. Yes or No? 2. Do you believe that Scotland is a country. Yes or No? It really is that simple! Or if you want it even shorter “Decisions affecting Scotland’s future should be taken in Scotland” or “It is important to remember that this is not a vote on policies but that those policies are made within Scotland” As this article argues, “It’s the governance, stupid.” “the central question [is] from where should the Scottish people be governed, Westminster or Scotland? This is the supreme question- all others are secondary. The democratic deficit of Tory rule we didn’t vote for is the one thing that the Noes have done everything to keep out of the debate. For them the referendum is to be about anything else.” - 2 - Better Together (BT) continue to argue that this referendum is about Alex Salmond and the SNP to deter many non-SNP (Labour mainly) voters. It’s also about attacking the man rather than the argument, perhaps because they can longer effectively attack the argument? FYI, Blair McDougall runs the Better Together/ No Thanks / UKOK campaign under Alasdair Darling’s leadership... - 3 - Despite BT’s claims that this referendum is somehow about Alex Salmond, as this article here explains, there are far more groups and unaffiliated individuals involved in the independence campaign than even the SNP. Furthermore, the desire for independence grows and several more Labour and LibDem figures have announced their support for independence: “Former Labour MP Peter Kilfoyle backs Yes vote” – see BBC News “Dornan switches to Yes campaign: A councillor and former activist for both Labour and the pro- Union campaign has declared his support for an independent Scotland” – see Milngavie Herald “Former Aberdeen Labour secretary urges fellow party members to vote Yes” “Allan Waite, 44, said he had become disillusioned with Scottish Labour, which he said had moved away from its core values.” – see Evening Express “A leading Liberal Democrat in the Highlands has revealed he is planning to vote Yes to Scottish independence. Alan MacRae, who stood in the Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch constituency at the 2011 Holyrood elections, said he “can’t think of a single good reason to vote No”.” – see Press and Journal “Former minister in Scottish independence Yes vote” “Leslie Huckfield, who served in James Callaghan's government in the 1970s, is urging Labour supporters to follow his lead and vote for independence on September 18. He said an independent Scotland offers an opportunity to implement the policies and causes that Labour has traditionally supported.” (ITV News) “Edinburgh’s first female Lord Provost declares for Yes” “A member of Labour for about 20 years, she left the party because: “I just drifted away, disillusioned with Tony Blair’s New Labour - it did nothing for me”.” – see here “Lib Dem ex-MP John Barrett to vote Yes” “John Barrett, who represented Edinburgh West, made clear he was “no fan” of the SNP and vowed to remain a Lib Dem, but he said independence offered Scotland an opportunity for change which would be “forever lost with a No vote”.” – see Edinburgh News here and here “Dr Michael Foxley, a former Highland Council leader who has worked with Charles Kennedy and Chief Secretary to the UK Treasury Danny Alexander, [is] backing the case for leaving the union.” – see Scotsman and the Herald “Inverclyde councillor to defy Labour Party line and vote 'Yes'” – Greenock Telegraph “Former Scottish Labour chairman says NHS is safe only with a Yes vote” “The Scottish Labour leadership has lost all credibility over its hypocritical denial of the threat to NHS in Scotland in the event of a No vote, a former party chairman said today. Bob Thomson said Alastair Darling, Johann Lamont and former Labour First Minister Lord McConnell were fooling no-one with their claims that the Scottish NHS cannot be damaged by Westminster cuts, driven by rampant privatisation of the health service in England. He said: “It is no surprise that already more than 230,000 Labour supporters have said they will vote Yes on September 18 and I have no doubt that this is due in no small part to the sheer hypocrisy of Darling, Lamont and now Jack McConnell.” – see here “RMT members back 'Yes' vote” – BBC News “Skye Lib Dem councillor defects to Yes vote” “I will be voting yes because I believe Scotland deserves to get the government it votes for in order to ensure its future success. We can be a successful, independent country with the government the people of Scotland chose.” – The Press and Journal Other surprise supporters for independence have included Sir George Mathewson, a former RBS chief executive and chairman, who said that independence would be “an opportunity not a threat” and argued that financial services in Scotland had been “neglected by the Westminster government and its London- centric policy”. He also claimed that banks such as RBS and Lloyds could “scarcely be described as Scottish banks”, adding that if there was a Yes vote in next month’s referendum it should be the rest of the UK government that should be primarily responsible for dealing with the situation. Sir George also gave his backing to Scottish Government plans for a currency union with the rest of the UK to be established if there is a Yes vote on September 18, allowing an independent Scotland to continue to use the pound. (see the Scotsman) - 4 - Ralph Topping, CEO of William Hill, in the Financial Times writes that “The big gamble for Scotland is staying in the union” “have spent the past six years as chief executive of a company whose 17,000 employees work in Scotland, elsewhere in the UK and throughout the world.
Recommended publications
  • Dr Brooke Magnanti | Belle De Jour Radfems, Racism, and the Problem
    Dr Brooke Magnanti | Belle de Jour: Radfems, racism, and the problem with "pimps" 12/30/13 9:00 AM Radfems, racism, and the problem with "pimps" sexonomics-uk.blogspot.de “Powerful … constructively controversial.” - Telegraph “As entertaining as it is erudite.” - Observer “Ambitious, meticulously researched and passionate.” - Independent "Impeccably well- researched" - Huffington Post "I disagree with just about everything she has to say" - Julie Bindel I was re-reading Iceberg Slim recently (as you do), and wondering what exactly it is the anti-sex brigade mean when they go around calling people "pimps". I've been called a pimp before. By Julie Bindel, to my face, and I laughed because it is so ridiculous: I have never profited off of anyone's erotic capital but my own… and arguably Billie Piper's, though that makes me no more and perhaps significantly less pimp-like than (say) her agent and the show's producers. I don't get particularly offended by such obviously over the top labels. But the word itself has started to crop up more and more in the arguments surrounding sex work and the proposed laws regarding prostitution. Take for example in Ireland, where the widespread assumption is that all sex workers are a) women and b) "pimped". Both of these are demonstrably and flagrantly not true, and yet are found in virtually any media coverage of the topic which is heavily influenced by an unholy coalition of extreme religious groups and extreme radfem ideologues. The side issue dogging the proposed changes, that is, the discourse about what exactly constitutes trafficking and who exactly is trafficked, is of course pretty openly racist - both the words and the imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Wonder Women
    WONDER WOMEN: Online I Newspapers I Apps A FEMALE SLICE OF LIFE New for Q4 2012: The Telegraph’s women’s channel – An exciting digital daily digest filled with thinking women’s content All too often women’s content is either just lipsticks and handbags or BMW - bitching moaning and whining about the glass ceiling – a brand of feminism a new generation of women don’t identify with. By contrast, Wonder Women, The Telegraph’s new daily online section dedicated to attracting young female readers (25-44), is going to be filled with thinking women’s content – defined by its irreverent, quick-witted and honest tone. Being digital-first means the section will react quickly to breaking news and make use of the freedom the web brings – while retaining quality journalism by drawing upon on a fabulous new range of writers. Think of Wonder Women as a younger-skewed BBC Radio 4 Women’s Hour on paper – which adds a whole new slate of content, viewpoints and writers to Telegraph.co.uk – while also promoting all relevant existing content and great Telegraph writers. COVERAGE CONTRIBUTORS & CONTENT Politics | Business | Mother Tongue | Sex | Life • Cathy Newman, Channel 4 News presenter and former FT political correspondent – on politics • Felicity Parkes, the 20-something political assistant causing a stir in Westminster with her anonymous blog about the halls of power – on women at Westminster • Dr Brooke Magnanti, author of Belle de Jour – The Secret Diary of a Call Girl - on sex • Dr Petra Boynton, renowned sex educator and agony aunt, will solve reader’s issues in a weekly sex column • Tamara Mellon*, co-founder of Jimmy Choo – on business • Katy Brand, comedian and impersonator – on life • High profile mums, such as Lily Allen*, writing about their experiences for our brand new parent blog: Mother Tongue • Diary of a Board Babe - an anonymous female board director of a FTSE 100 company will pen a weekly blog on what life on a male-dominated board is really like *tbc OUR AUDIENCE LAUNCH MONTH SPONSORSHIP When compared to all women..
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Manifesto
    THE SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2016 THE SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2016 CHAPTER HEADING A STRONG OPPOSITION - A STRONGER SCOTLAND A STRONG OPPOSITION. A STRONGER SCOTLAND 1 THE SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2016 Contents RUTH DAVIDSON FOR A STRONG OPPOSITION Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 NO TO A SECOND REFERENDUM The facts ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Why it matters .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Our commitment ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 HOLDING THE SNP TO ACCOUNT Our programme for
    [Show full text]
  • Media Culture for a Modern Nation? Theatre, Cinema and Radio in Early Twentieth-Century Scotland
    Media Culture for a Modern Nation? Theatre, Cinema and Radio in Early Twentieth-Century Scotland a study © Adrienne Clare Scullion Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD to the Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Glasgow. March 1992 ProQuest Number: 13818929 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13818929 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Frontispiece The Clachan, Scottish Exhibition of National History, Art and Industry, 1911. (T R Annan and Sons Ltd., Glasgow) GLASGOW UNIVERSITY library Abstract This study investigates the cultural scene in Scotland in the period from the 1880s to 1939. The project focuses on the effects in Scotland of the development of the new media of film and wireless. It addresses question as to what changes, over the first decades of the twentieth century, these two revolutionary forms of public technology effect on the established entertainment system in Scotland and on the Scottish experience of culture. The study presents a broad view of the cultural scene in Scotland over the period: discusses contemporary politics; considers established and new theatrical activity; examines the development of a film culture; and investigates the expansion of broadcast wireless and its influence on indigenous theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Experiences of Time of Use Tariffs Report Prepared for Consumer Focus
    Consumer Experiences Of Time of Use Tariffs Report prepared for Consumer Focus Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................ i Introduction .................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 Time of Use Tariffs ..................................................................................... 1 Research objectives ................................................................................... 2 Methodology............................................................................................... 4 Consumer profile ........................................................................... 7 Type of ToU tariff ....................................................................................... 7 Type of home heating ................................................................................ 8 Home tenure and housing type .................................................................. 9 Social grade ............................................................................................. 10 Household income and sources of income .............................................. 11 Age profile ................................................................................................ 13 Regional distribution ................................................................................. 14 Payment method for electricity
    [Show full text]
  • Grez Hidalgo2020.Pdf (1.770Mb)
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY ON CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM PARLIAMENT THE CONTRIBUTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEES TO (POLITICAL?) RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSTITUTION PABLO SALVADOR GREZ HIDALGO Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2019 IN MEMORIAM FRANCISCO GREZ MORANDI iii ABSTRACT / LAY SUMMARY This thesis focuses on institutional arrangements designed to strengthen the ability of political institutions to assess the constitutional implications of legislation in the law-making process. It sheds light in the under-developed field of parliamentary constitutional assessments by bringing together disparate constitutional theory literature that discusses or touches upon the distinctiveness of this activity with a view to conceptualise “legislative scrutiny on constitutional grounds” (“LSGC”). The thesis distinguishes three alternative conceptions of LSCG: a legalistic conception, a conception of constitutional deliberation, and a conception of constitutional construction and development.
    [Show full text]
  • New Directions in the International Political Economy of Energy
    Review of International Political Economy ISSN: 0969-2290 (Print) 1466-4526 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrip20 New directions in the international political economy of energy Caroline Kuzemko, Andrew Lawrence & Matthew Watson To cite this article: Caroline Kuzemko, Andrew Lawrence & Matthew Watson (2019) New directions in the international political economy of energy, Review of International Political Economy, 26:1, 1-24, DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1553796 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1553796 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 28 Jan 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 827 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rrip20 REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY 2019, VOL. 26, NO. 1, 1–24 https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1553796 SPECIAL SECTION: NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE IPE OF ENERGY New directions in the international political economy of energy Caroline Kuzemkoa, Andrew Lawrenceb and Matthew Watsona aPolitics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; bWits School of Governance, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa ABSTRACT Until relatively recently international political economy (IPE) scholarship on energy has tended to focus on oil, rather than energy understood in its full, current diver- sity through IPE’s tripartite liberal, realist or critical lenses. Over the past decade or so there have, however, been far-reaching transformations in the global economy, not least in response to the increased recognition, and visibility, of damaging mani- festations of fossil fuel usage and human-induced climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 History Higher Paper 1 Finalised Marking Instructions
    © 2015 History Higher Paper 1 Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 2015 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only on a non- commercial basis. If it is to be used for any other purposes written permission must be obtained from SQA’s NQ Assessment team. Where the publication includes materials from sources other than SQA (secondary copyright), this material should only be reproduced for the purposes of examination or assessment. If it needs to be reproduced for any other purpose it is the centre’s responsibility to obtain the necessary copyright clearance. SQA’s NQ Assessment team may be able to direct you to the secondary sources. These Marking Instructions have been prepared by Examination Teams for use by SQA Appointed Markers when marking External Course Assessments. This publication must not be reproduced for commercial or trade purposes. Part One: General Marking Principles for: History Higher Paper 1 This information is provided to help you understand the general principles you must apply when marking candidate responses to questions in this Paper. These principles must be read in conjunction with the specific Marking Instructions for each question. (a) Marks for each candidate response must always be assigned in line with these general marking principles and the specific Marking Instructions for the relevant question. If a specific candidate response does not seem to be covered by either the principles or detailed Marking Instructions, and you are uncertain how to assess it, you must seek guidance from your Team Leader/Principal Assessor. (b) Marking should always be positive ie, marks should be awarded for what is correct and not deducted for errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Judiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom
    Copyright 2014 by Erin F. Delaney Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 108, No. 2 JUDICIARY RISING: CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM Erin F. Delaney ABSTRACT—Britain is experiencing a period of dramatic change that challenges centuries-old understandings of British constitutionalism. In the past fifteen years, the British Parliament enacted a quasi-constitutional bill of rights; devolved legislative power to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and created a new Supreme Court. British academics debate how each element of this transformation can be best understood: is it consistent with political constitutionalism and historic notions of parliamentary sovereignty, or does it usher in a new regime that places external, rule-of- law-based limits on Parliament? Much of this commentary examines these changes in a piecemeal fashion, failing to account for the systemic factors at play in the British system. This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid. AUTHOR—Assistant Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. For helpful conversations during a transatlantic visit at a very early stage of this project, I am grateful to Trevor Allan, Lord Hope, Charlie Jeffery, Lord Collins, and Stephen Tierney.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sex Myth
    ‘As entertaining as it is erudite’ Catherine Hakin, Observer ieielout & ' Praise for The Sex Myth ‘She accomplishes this heroic task with humour, skill and passion in a book that is as entertaining as it is erudite’ Katherine Hakin, Observer ‘An important book . exactly the kind of level-headed analysis that could help to dispel some of the hysteria surrounding the sex industry’ Suzi Godson, The Times ‘There is a lot to admire in The Sex Myth . should be read by anyone claiming an interest in sex and, especially, sex equality’ Katie Law, Evening Standard ‘An enlightening must-read for anyone exposed to the press’ Abby O’Reilly, Independent on Sunday Dr Brooke Magnanti studied Genetic Epidemiology and gained her PhD at the Department of Forensic Pathology, University of Sheffield. Her professional interests include population-based research, stan­ dards of evidence, and human biology and anthropology. In 2009 it was revealed that she is an ex-call girl and author of the bestselling Belle de Jour series of memoirs, which were adapted into the T V series Secret Diary of a Call Girl, starring Billie Piper. Follow Brooke on Twitter @bmagnanti. By Brooke Magnanti Writing as Belle de Jour The Intimate Adventures of a London Call Girl Further Adventures of a London Call Girl Playing the Game Belle de Jour’s Guide to Men Writing as Dr Brooke Magnanti The Sex Myth The Sex Myth Why everything we’re told is wrong Dr Brooke Magnanti First published in Great Britain in 2012 by Weidenfeld & Nicolson This paperback edition published in 2013 by Phoenix, an imprint of Orion Books Ltd, Orion House, 5 Upper St Martin’s Lane London WC2H 9EA An Hachette UK company 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Copyright © Bizrealm Limited 2012 Bizrealm Limited has asserted Dr Brooke Magnanti’s right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance and Constitution Committee
    Finance and Constitution Committee Thursday 6 September 2018 Session 5 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.parliament.scot or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Thursday 6 September 2018 CONTENTS Col. EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 ..................................................................................................... 1 FINANCE AND CONSTITUTION COMMITTEE 21st Meeting 2018, Session 5 CONVENER *Bruce Crawford (Stirling) (SNP) DEPUTY CONVENER *Adam Tomkins (Glasgow) (Con) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Neil Bibby (West Scotland) (Lab) *Alexander Burnett (Aberdeenshire West) (Con) *Willie Coffey (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP) *Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) *Emma Harper (South Scotland) (SNP) *Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) *James Kelly (Glasgow) (Lab) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO PARTICIPATED: Rt Hon David Mundell MP (Secretary of State for Scotland) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE James Johnston LOCATION The David Livingstone Room (CR6) 1 6 SEPTEMBER 2018 2 I am satisfied with the level of engagement. UK Scottish Parliament officials are in contact with their counterparts in the devolved Administrations every day, discussing Finance and Constitution our preparations for exit. For example, since January, more than 30 further deep-dive policy Committee sessions between UK Government and devolved Administration officials have been held as part of Thursday 6 September 2018 the first phase
    [Show full text]
  • Monday 17/09 – a Motion Is Passed at the Liberal Democrat Conference for the Government to Improve Housing Standards and Reduc
    Tom Crisp Editor 01603 604421 [email protected] Monday 17/09 – A motion is passed at the Liberal Democrat conference for the government to improve housing standards and ENERGY PERSPECTIVE 02 reduce fuel poverty. Ofgem affirms its position that its work on market- wide settlement reform should not include centralisation of supplier Steady as she goes: the rise of agent functions, and that it is considering whether aggregated data corporate PPAs – Ben Hall should be provided into central settlement systems at all. POLICY 05 RenewableUK celebrates the UK surpassing 20GW of wind generation capacity. Summit brings welcome progress on UK’s EV transition Tuesday 18/09 – Chinese nuclear energy company CNG says that Adam Smith Institute warns of negative consequences of price “political sensitivities” could lead to it giving up the chance to operate caps its planned Bradwell power station in Essex. OVO Energy announces Royal Society and RAE detail that it has taken control of German energy provider 4hundred. A 50% how UK can hit net zero carbon stake in the Hornsea 1 offshore windfarm is sold by Ørsted to Global REGULATION 10 Infrastructure Partners for £4.46bn. Media reports indicate Birmingham City Council could drop plans to establish its own energy supply Balancing charges up for review company. Five-year review of transmission charges suggests 20% increase Wednesday 19/09 –Energy and Clean Growth Minister Claire Perry in revenues Ofgem takes forward gives Hydraulic Fracturing Consent to shale gas operator Cuadrilla for competition in transmission its second well at its Preston New Road site in Lancashire.
    [Show full text]