Rmy Was Forced to Yield Ground to 2 Frenoh Armd D1V in Tho North and 5 French ..:"..Rmd Div in Tho South

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rmy Was Forced to Yield Ground to 2 Frenoh Armd D1V in Tho North and 5 French ..: - 56 - on the left wing of the .irillY GrouPt Nineteenth ..:\rmy was forced to yield ground to 2 Frenoh Armd D1V in tho North and 5 French ..:"..rmd Div in tho South. But the BOSt significant dovelopmont of the day was the rosumJ)tion of largo-scale .~".lliod oporations in the Aachon area. 1fussivo air attacks on lin0s of defenco and sunnly routos ~recodod attacks on a wide front. ~t 1710 hrs O.B. West loarnt from his Chief Intolligence Officor that tho northorn wing of ~\rmy Group B faced an anomy concontration of five armourod and sevon infantry divisions - S080 British, somo P~orican, Concludin6 that tho contro of gravity of tho Allied efforts was now at tho northern wing of Army Group B, O.B West immediatoly authorizod Ittmy G~oup B to coruuit 47 pz Corrys, In addition to this 10 SS rz Div was to ~ovo fron tho aroa oast of !~nhom to the aroa east of Vonlo, and P~my Group H would desryatch 85,245 and 363 VGD's to tho aroa behind tho 1fuas-oast front. Tho consoquent tomporary woakening of l~my Group H was a tolerablo risk and had to bo acce~tod. (Ibid, 16 Nov) 17 Nov 123. Due to IDTIited visibility _\Iliod air activity at tho front of' Army Group B was sOl'lGWhat smaller than on the proceding day, and by cOL~~itting virtually all froG roserves tho l\rmy Group was able to hold tho Allied forces in the greater Aachen area in chock. Developmonts in the aroa of Army Group G woro decidodly unfavourablo; in order to maintain a coherent front First £rny had to fall back to rear positions and loave tho garrison of Metz to its fato. Alliod forces had alroady ontered the southorn suburbs of Matz. At- the southern wing of Ninoteenth tlXflY tho oDponont reached tho area 10 kID ~~Bolfort. Obviously tho !ullod operations against Ninoteonth ~rmy wore lliore than more holding attacks. Rundstedt bolievod that he could not co~o with the situation without making use of the OT~N rosorvos ,.- but his requost in that sense was turned down flatly: DOS9ite all stop gap measuros, reprosonting tho utmost O.B. West could do on his own, a defansive succoss against the onomy's largo­ scale attacks cannot be guarantood. In a telephono convorsation with tho Chief of the :ITmed Forces O:,)erations Staff, C. of S. O. B. West points to the newly arrived SS formations and the desirability of cOLu~itting than before the enemy achievos a stratogical broal~hrough. Chief ~~St doclinod [to consider] the possibility of such a comoitmont and announced that in tho caso of such a dovelopment tho 0I0N Rosorvus concorned would have to bo romov.od from tho aroa. (Ibid, 17 Nov) ":" 57 - 18 Nov 124. Whilo !~ny GrouDs Hand B were undor modurate pressure only, dovelopments in the area of Jxmy Group G were causing mounting concorn at the hoadQuartors of O.B. Wost. The loss of 4~saco and Lorraine had becomo a distinct possibility. The further Alliod advancos in the aroa of First Army had not CODO as a surprise, but a broal~hrough at the extro~o left wing of Ninotoenth ;~my north of the Svliss bordor via DelIo to Courcellos and Grandvillors raised tho spectre of- serious operational repercussions. G.B. West expressed astonishment at the unoxp0ctod developmonts in the Belfort area and domanded energetic countor-neasuros. (Ibid, 18 Nov) 19 Nov 125. /~my Group H was forced to yiold som.e ground at the Venlo bridgehead, Lriny Group Blast Goilonldrohen but on balanco obtained a dofensive success by foiling tho opponent's determined attempt to collapse the saliont north of ~\aehGn. In the area of ~rmy Group G, howovor, tho situation showed further detorioration. _~,.t the southern wing of Nineteonth 4\rmy tho breakthrough at Dolle had boen widonod; and enemy forces had reachod points 20 km l~ and 12 km E Delle. Moreover, the o~?ponont was approaching Belfort. When it becamo known that enemy forces had pushed oastwards to tho Rhine at HUningen, and to nearby Rosenau and Sirentz, the defence of Mulhouso became a matter of immediato urgenoy and 0 B. West instructed Military District No. 5 CUsaco, WUrtom.berg and Badon) to dospatch all availablo foroos undor its command to tho aroa south and southwest of Mulhouso. ~ Ibid, 19 Nov) 20 Nov 126. At the front of l'.XD.Y Group B- Allied forces made only some moderate gains of ground north of Aachen, but the situation at Army Group G was continuing to oause ooncern. In the oentre, .~erican foroes were approaohing Saarburg (a mere 50 km WNW strassburg), further south, French forces ~re getting still closer to Belfort. German counter-attaoks in both areas had been of no avail. In a telephone convers­ ation at 1~45 hrs between C. of- S. O.B. West and Deputy Ohief WFSt, O.B. West asked for permission to use pz Lehr Div at the Belfort gap and 1.2 VGD in the Aaohen area. His oontention was that these forces would go far to restore the situation and could be withdrawn in good time to be available for the Abwehrsohlacht. Both requests were turned down. This left only the forces in the Netherlands as a possible source of formations for the fooal points of the front. South of the - 58 - Maas (resp. Waal) there were now only one British division (on Walcheren), one Polish division, one Canadian armoured division, one armoured brigade and some Dutch volunteers, while the German forces, after all pending withdrawals would still consist of two Corps with a total of five divisions. O.B. West therefore gave" orders for the withdrawal of an additional CorDs Headauarters and two divisions from this front; one division to bo transferred to Army Group G with tho greatost possible snoed. (Ibid, 20 Nov) '. - 21 Nov 127. Headquarters 2 SS :'z CorDs, slated f or a rolo in tho Abwehrschlacht (paras 121 and l2~ abovo), was now being relioved in the area east of Arnhem-Nijmcgen by H.Q. 88 Corps, hitherto at tho 1fuas-north front. The SS Corps H.Q. was to be available in the aroa of ~\rmy Group B, complete with Corps trooDs by 25 Nov at the latest. With regard to current oporations the day was characterized by various local engagomonts in tho Aachen ragion. North of Eschwoiler the opponent gained further ground, and O.B. West granted .l'>Xmy Group B's request for permission to Ehcr.fte;n the" front and give up Eschweiler to save the garrison. Ibid, 21 Nov) . ~ 128. In the aren of Army Group G, howevor, the situation in southeastern Lorraino was worsening. Thore had been a serious break-in astride the Rhine-1furne Canal. A blocking line in process of being established 10 km N Baarburg, had already been pierced. Efforts were made to form a blocking line west of Saverne. In view of this, OIDr now gave pornission for the temporary employnont of pz Lchr Div. O.B. West placed tho Division under ~rmy Group G and gavo orders for its imraediate denarture in the direction Homburg-Saarunion, to be co~~ittGd to an attack from the North against the deep flank of the enemy in the Saarburg aroa. Immediatoly upon arrival of the first infantry division from ~~my Group H, pz Lehr Div would have to revert to OlaV reserve. - In the Belfort area 198 Inf Div soemed to be gaining some measure of defensive success. (Ibid) 22 Nov 129. On its extroille loft wing, ~\rmy Group H was 'oxpecting an attack on the Roermond bridgohead. As a precautionary measure 85 Inf Div and an assault gun brigade were boing moved to the area as an Army Group roserve. In addition, 6 Para Regt was being shifted from the Venlo bridgehead to the area between Venlo and Roermond. But it was toe late to save the bridgohead, and at 1700 hrs it was reported lost. - In the meantime 3 Para Div (en route from Army Group H ~o Seventh -\rmy) was directed to DUren as a - 59 - potential backstop oast of !~chon. Permission for this had beon granted by OIn1 on the roquost of O.B. West despite tho fact that the formation was slated for employment in tho forthcoming offonsive. (Ibid, 22 Nov) 130. In tho area of ...'l:rmy Group G the opponent was making further gains, and operations that had previously served the purpose of trading s')ace for time wero now turning into a des~orate last minute offort to koep the enomy from engulfing ...\lsace and Lorraine. East of Metz tho opponent was advancing in the St. A..,old area, a moro 30 len fron tho western borders of tho lBlatlnate. Further south tho enemy h~d entered Alsace from southeastern Lorraino'snd was reported to havo entered Saverno. The German troops in tho aroa seemed to have disintegrated. :\8 no reports wero being receivm from H.Q. 88 Corps at Saverne, this staff was pr~sumed inca-pacitated, and tho "Highor COIlm18nd Vosges" charged with the task of collecting tho various shattered groups and creating some sort of dofence line.. pz Lehr Div had not yet appea~od and O.B. Wost employed every means to hasten its journey .. Due to the SWl1f'tly changing situation the projectod flank attack now would have to be deliverod against tho !unorican Corps in the Savorno area. (Ibid) . - 23 Nov 131. Army Group H reported meroly renowed attacks against the alroady shrunken Vonlo bridgehoad.
Recommended publications
  • Operation Overlord James Clinton Emmert Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2002 Operation overlord James Clinton Emmert Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Emmert, James Clinton, "Operation overlord" (2002). LSU Master's Theses. 619. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/619 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OPERATION OVERLORD A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Arts in The Interdepartmental Program in Liberal Arts by James Clinton Emmert B.A., Louisiana State University, 1996 May 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been completed without the support of numerous persons. First, I would never have been able to finish if I had not had the help and support of my wife, Esther, who not only encouraged me and proofed my work, but also took care of our newborn twins alone while I wrote. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Stanley Hilton, who spent time helping me refine my thoughts about the invasion and whose editing skills helped give life to this paper. Finally, I would like to thank the faculty of Louisiana State University for their guidance and the knowledge that they shared with me.
    [Show full text]
  • German Army Group D OB West, 12 August 1942
    German Army Group D "OB West" 12 August 1942 At Army Group's Disposal 100th Panzer Brigade 2/202nd Panzer Regiment In the Netherlands: 38th Division: 1/,2/,3/108th Infantry Regiment 1/,2/,3/112th Infantry Regiment 138th Schnell Battalion 1/,2/,3/138th Artillery Regiment 138th Pioneer Battalion 138th Signals Battalion 138th Division (Einheiten) Support Units 167th Division: 1/,2/,3/315th Infantry Regiment 1/,2/,3/331st Infantry Regiment 1/,2/,3/339th Infantry Regiment 238th Panzerjäger Battalion 238th Bicycle Battalion 1/,2/,3/,4/238th Artillery Regiment 238th Pioneer Battalion 238th Signals Battalion 238th Division (Einheiten) Support Units 719th Division: 1/,2/,3/723rd Infantry Regiment 1/,2/,3/743rd Infantry Regiment Panzerjäger Company 663rd Artillery Battalion 719th Pioneer Company 719th Signals Battalion 719th Division (Einheiten) Support Units 15th Army At Army's Disposal: 10th Panzer Division: 1/,2/7th Armored Regiment 10th Panzer Grenadier Brigade 1/,2/,3/69th Panzer Grenadier Regiment 1/,2/,3/86th Panzer Grenadier Regiment 90th Panzerjäger Battalion 90th Motorcycle Battalion 1/,2/,3/,4/90th Artillery Regiment 90th Signals Battalion 46th Pioneer Battalion 90th Division (Einheiten) Support Units SS Leibstandarte Adolph Hitler 1/,2/,3/1st SS LSSAH Motorized Infantry Regiment 1/,2/,3/2nd SS LSSAH Motorized Infantry Regiment SS Leibstandarte Adolph Hitler Sturmgeschütz Battalion SS Leibstandarte Adolph Hitler Armored Troop SS Leibstandarte Adolph Hitler Motorcycle Regiment 1 1/,2/,3/,4/SS Leibstandarte Adolph Hitler (mot) Artillery
    [Show full text]
  • Record Copy to Be Retired When \\O Longer©Needed
    D J 739 MS # C-065a /? aao.C <- * - c.l Fgn MS English Copy GBEIMER_pIABY_MpjgES, 12 Aug 1942 - 12 Mar 1943 RECORD COPY TO BE RETIRED WHEN \\O LONGER©NEEDED flROPSRTY OF US ARMY HISTORICAL DIVISION HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY EUROPE FOREIGN MILITARY STUDIES BRANCH MS # C-065a Helmuth GREENER Ministerialrat Custodian of the War Diary in HITLER©S Headquarters (August 1939 - April 1943) NOTES on the Situation Reports and Discussions at HITLER©S Headquarters from 12 August 1942 to 1? March 1943 Translator: Werner METER Editor : LUCAS Reviewer : Lt. Col. VERNON HISTORICAL DIVISION EUROPEAN COl-iMAND MS # C~065 a FOBStfOBD This manuscript is part of a narrative history of events in the German Armed Forces Supreme Command Headquarters during World War II. The writer, Hell- Mith G-BSINM, was charged with writing the War Diary at that headquarters from August 1939 to April 22, 1942. He has based hie work on notes taken at various conferences, copies of final drafts for entry in the War Diary, copies of HIJLER©S directives, orders end documents he was able to save from destruction at great personal risk. With the aid of these sources and the trained mind and memory of a professional historian, he has presented a vivid picture of HITLilR© S method of com mand as well as his reaction to reverses end success and the various other factors which influenced de cisions in both the military and the political spheres. In addition to a general description of procedures in the supreme headquarters it includes details of or ganization and the composition of HITLER©S immediate staff.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii Veteran’S Committee, Washington, Dc Under a Generous Grant from the Dodge Jones Foundation 2
    W WORLD WWAR IIII A TEACHING LESSON PLAN AND TOOL DESIGNED TO PRESERVE AND DOCUMENT THE WORLD’S GREATEST CONFLICT PREPARED BY THE WORLD WAR II VETERAN’S COMMITTEE, WASHINGTON, DC UNDER A GENEROUS GRANT FROM THE DODGE JONES FOUNDATION 2 INDEX Preface Organization of the World War II Veterans Committee . Tab 1 Educational Standards . Tab 2 National Council for History Standards State of Virginia Standards of Learning Primary Sources Overview . Tab 3 Background Background to European History . Tab 4 Instructors Overview . Tab 5 Pre – 1939 The War 1939 – 1945 Post War 1945 Chronology of World War II . Tab 6 Lesson Plans (Core Curriculum) Lesson Plan Day One: Prior to 1939 . Tab 7 Lesson Plan Day Two: 1939 – 1940 . Tab 8 Lesson Plan Day Three: 1941 – 1942 . Tab 9 Lesson Plan Day Four: 1943 – 1944 . Tab 10 Lesson Plan Day Five: 1944 – 1945 . Tab 11 Lesson Plan Day Six: 1945 . Tab 11.5 Lesson Plan Day Seven: 1945 – Post War . Tab 12 3 (Supplemental Curriculum/American Participation) Supplemental Plan Day One: American Leadership . Tab 13 Supplemental Plan Day Two: American Battlefields . Tab 14 Supplemental Plan Day Three: Unique Experiences . Tab 15 Appendixes A. Suggested Reading List . Tab 16 B. Suggested Video/DVD Sources . Tab 17 C. Suggested Internet Web Sites . Tab 18 D. Original and Primary Source Documents . Tab 19 for Supplemental Instruction United States British German E. Veterans Organizations . Tab 20 F. Military Museums in the United States . Tab 21 G. Glossary of Terms . Tab 22 H. Glossary of Code Names . Tab 23 I. World War II Veterans Questionnaire .
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Assault
    Operation 'Market Garden' A Bridge Too Far Campaign by nemesszili Can you reach the Bridge Too Far, while battling the Germans on Highway 69? Historical Background Following the grandiose Operation Overlord, the Allies left behind the nightmare of the 'Bocage'. The Germans were exhausted, but still held key positions in France. When the Allies finally succeeded in trapping the 7th Army and the 5th Panzer Army, and Operation Diadem, the invasion of Southern France was also a success, the Germans were forced to leave France, and prepare for the defense of the Reich, and other key positions in occupied Holland. Belgium was also liberated, along with Antwerpen, a large dock, which could be used by the Allies as a supply base for further operation. However, dense mines and V-2 Rockets, not mentioning the shore battery on Walcheren, denied the use of this port, and the Allies needed quickly supplies needed for attacking towards the Rhine. Only the 'Red Ball Express' helped something, but was not enough. So Germany had to be defeated quickly and decisively, so the supply problem could not endanger the Allied cause. Montgomery found the solution first, but this plan was pretty risky. He really underestimated the German strength in the area, not observing the warning of the Dutch Resistance, who warned Allied High command about the presence of German armored forces in the area. However, 'Operation Market Garden' was initiated on September 17th, 1944. The plan had two major phases: Firstly, the 1st Allied Airborne Army, composed by the 101st American Airborne Division (Screaming Eagles), 82nd American Airborne Division and the 1st British Airborne Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for the Ruhr: the German Army's Final Defeat in the West" (2006)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Battle for the Ruhr: The rGe man Army's Final Defeat in the West Derek Stephen Zumbro Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Zumbro, Derek Stephen, "Battle for the Ruhr: The German Army's Final Defeat in the West" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2507. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2507 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BATTLE FOR THE RUHR: THE GERMAN ARMY’S FINAL DEFEAT IN THE WEST A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Derek S. Zumbro B.A., University of Southern Mississippi, 1980 M.S., University of Southern Mississippi, 2001 August 2006 Table of Contents ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipating Overlord
    Anticipating Overlord ANTICIPATING OVERLORD INTELLIGENCE AND DECEPTION: GERMAN ESTIMATES OF ALLIED INTENTIONS TO LAND INVASION FORCES IN NORTHWEST EUROPE BY CAPTAIN THOMAS LEON CUBBAGE II MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRANCH, U.S. ARMY A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE SCHOOL, WASHINGTON, D.C. 06 JUNE 1969 (Re-Typed and Edited: 15 March 2016) Anticipating Overlord Table of Contents CHAPTER PAGE I INTRODUCTION …………………………………………….………….…….. 1 II GERMAN PLANS 1939-40 ……………………………….…….…….….….. 7 III ENGLISH INVASION PLANS 1940-41 ……………………….……….….. 11 IV GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1941 …………………………………... 14 V ALLIED INVASION PLANNING 1942 …………….……………………..… 17 VI GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1942 ……………………………….….. 20 VII ALLIED PLANS & DECEPTION OPS 1943 ..…………………….…….… 28 VIII GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES 1943 ……………….…………….….... 37 IX “FORTITUDE” – THE ALLIED DECEPTION PLAN ……….…...……,.…. 52 X ALLIED PLANNING: JANUARY THRU APRIL 1944………….…….….... 62 XI GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES: JANUARY THRU APRIL ……...….... 73 XII ALLIED INVASION PLANNING MAY 1944 ……………………...……….. 95 XIII GERMAN PLANS & ESTIMATES MAY 1944 ………………….…….…. 103 XIV THE FIRST FOUR DAYS OF JUNE 1944 ………………………….…… 122 XV THE LAST DAY BEFORE THE INVASION …………………………..…. 140 XVI D-DAY, TUESDAY, THE 6TH OF JUNE 1944 (0000 to 0530 Hours) …. 156 XVII D-DAY, TUESDAY, THE 6TH OF JUNE 1944 (0530 to 2400 Hours) …. 173 XVIII AFTERMATH — 7 JUNE THRU 25 JULY 1944 …………………….….. 190 XIX REVIEW OF GERMAN COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND ESTIMATES CAPABILITY………………………...…………………... 217 XX ROOTS OF THE GERMAN INTELLIGENCE FAILURE RE UNDERSTANDING D-DAY ….…………………………………… 225 XXI IMPLICATIONS OF THE GERMAN INTELLIGENCE FAILURE …..…. 236 i Anticipating Overlord BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………………………….………………... 239 Appendixes …………………………………………………………………...…….. 251 A. Table of Equivalent Ranks ……………………………………….………… 251 B. Glossary of German Individuals Appearing in this Paper ………..……... 252 C. Glossary of Code Names and Short Titles …………………………….… 255 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Floyd Hovis 1961
    THE OIL SUPPLY OF THE GERMAN ARMED FORCES: A CRUCIAL FACTOR IN 1944-1945 By GARY FLOYD HOVIS II Bachelor of Arts Westminster College Fulton, Missouri 1961 Subnitted to the faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial .f.'ulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS July, 1966 '· . ·. ~ THE OIL SUPPLY OF THE GERMAN ARMED FORCES: CRUCIAL FACTOR IN 19Li4=1945 Thesis Approved: PREFACE This work examines a neglected but important area of Nazi Germ.any in the final year of the war in Europe~ In the fall of 1944 the German Armed Forces faced a trying and decisive winter. The Western Allies were poised and ready to smash the German armies in the West into ob­ livion. In the East, the Russians were readying themselves for the final lunge to Berlin. On the surface, it appeared that Hitler had the needed human and material resources to prevent the Eastern and Western Fronts from collapsing completely. But this study penetrates the s~rface, and shows that the German Armed Forces were deficient in oil, an absolute necessity in waging mechanized war. In the 1930's and on into the war Hitler endeavored to give the Wehrmacht an independent oil supply. He almost succeeded, but even with his ability to plan for the future, he did not count on the tremendous force of air power that the Allies were able to bring to bear on the Ger­ man oil industry. The results of these well planned air raids on German refineries were of crucial importance in halting the Wehrmacht in the Ardennes Counteroffensive and later in br~nging the Third Reich to its knees.
    [Show full text]
  • American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe
    United States Cryptologic History American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa Series IV World War II Volume 1 American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe i46074 This publication is a product of the National Security Agency history program. It presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other U.S. government entity. UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY Sources in Cryptologic History Series IV Volume 1 American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe George F. Howe National Security Agency 2010 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Page Foreword . ix Author’s Note . x Introduction . .1 PART ONE: THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Chapter 1: Situation Report . .7 Early Conditions . 7 Early British Experiences with Field SIGINT . 10 German Army and Air Force SIGINT Organizations . 11 U.S. Preparations for SIGINT Service in the West . 13 The Call of the Mediterranean . .16 Chapter 2: Beginnings in Northwest Africa . 19 Planning SIGINT Service in Operation TORCH . 19 Operation TORCH . 23 Tunisia: Organization for the Second Phase . 28 Action during January 1943 . 30 Chapter 3: Axis Initiative in February 1943 . 35 Axis Plans — Allied Expectations . 35 Allied Reversals, 14-17 February 1943 . 36 Through Kasserine Pass . 38 Recapitulation . 39 Two Opposing Army Groups . 40 Chapter 4: The March Offensives . 45 Expectations . 45 II Corps Attacks: Gafsa, Maknassy, and El Guettar . 46 The Enemy Retreat to the Bridgehead . 48 Chapter 5: The Final Phase of Tunisia . .51 Summary . .51 The Attack Begins . 51 The End in Tunisia .
    [Show full text]
  • Colour Brochure 2011 1St Edition.Qxd
    AAFFTTEERR TTHHEE BBAATTTTLLEE NEW TITLE PUBLISHED JUNE 2019 In 2012 Jean Paul Pallud wrote the After the Battle account of the Desert War; now he completes the story with detailed coverage of JEAN PAUL PALLUD the landings of Operation ‘Torch’ in North-West Africa in November 1942. When the western Allies decided to launch a second front in North Africa, they carefully considered the anti-British feeling left in France by the ill-advised attack by the Royal Navy on the French Fleet at Mers el Kébir in July 1940. Consequently, the operation was given an American rather than a British complexion, General Eisenhower was chosen to lead a mostly American force into battle and the major Royal Navy contribution was kept as inconspicuous as possible. At this point in the war, the Allies had almost no experience with amphibious operations and it was a risky undertaking to carry out such an immense operation covering multiple landings over 600 miles apart. Even more amazing was the fact that part of the invasion forces was to depart from the United States, 6,000 miles away. As the orders were not confirmed until a month before Operation ‘Torch’ was launched, there was very little time to organise such a logistically complex operation involving American and British forces, and even less time for the pro-Allied French to organise more than small measures of support. There were two landings in the Mediterranean, at three main points near Algiers and three near Oran, and three landings on the Atlantic coast of Morocco. There, the main landing came ashore at Fédala, 18 miles north-east of Casablanca, and the armour was brought ashore at Safi, 140 miles south-east.
    [Show full text]
  • WWII Conflict Archaeology in the Forêt Domaniale Des Andaines, NW France
    WWII Conflict Archaeology in the Forêt Domaniale des Andaines, NW France. Volume 1 of 1 Submitted by David Capps-Tunwell MBE to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Publication in Human Geography, April 2016. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract This thesis integrates archaeological survey, aerial photographs and historical documents to undertake the first analysis of the conflict landscapes and military history of some of the most important German logistics facilities in northern France during the Battle of Normandy in 1944. Post-war survival of features has been remarkably good in this forested setting and this likely constitutes one of the best- preserved and most extensive examples of a non-hardened WWII archaeological landscape yet documented in northwest Europe. Over 900 discrete archaeological earthworks have been mapped and interpreted with the aid of primary source material from both Allied and German archives to characterise munitions, fuel and rations depots in the Forêt Domaniale des Andaines around Bagnoles-de-l’Orne, Orne Département, Basse-Normandie. These landscapes also preserve bomb craters associated with air raids on the facilities by the US Ninth Air Force and these have been mapped and analysed to show that despite 46 separate attacks by over 1000 aircraft, and the dropping in excess of 1100 tons of bombs in the forest during the spring and summer of 1944, the depots continued to function and to support German Army operations until the area was occupied by American forces in August 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Army European Command, Historical Division Typescript Studies, 1945-1954
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf696nb1jc No online items Register of the United States Army European Command, Historical Division Typescript Studies, 1945-1954 Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 1999, 2012 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. 66026 1 Register of the United States Army European Command, Historical Division Typescript Studies, 1945-1954 Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California Contact Information Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 1999, 2012 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: United States Army European Command, Historical Division Typescript Studies, Date (inclusive): 1945-1954 Collection number: 66026 Creator: United States. Army. European Command. Historical Division Collection Size: 60 manuscript boxes(25.2 linear feet) Repository: Hoover Institution Archives Stanford, California 94305-6010 Abstract: Relates to German military operations in Europe, on the Eastern Front, and in the Mediterranean Theater, during World War II. Studies prepared by former high-ranking German Army officers for the Foreign Military Studies Program of the Historical Division, U.S. Army, Europe. Language: English. Access Collection open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all audiovisual material is immediately accessible.
    [Show full text]