American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe United States Cryptologic History American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa Series IV World War II Volume 1 American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe i46074 This publication is a product of the National Security Agency history program. It presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other U.S. government entity. UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY Sources in Cryptologic History Series IV Volume 1 American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe George F. Howe National Security Agency 2010 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Page Foreword . ix Author’s Note . x Introduction . .1 PART ONE: THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Chapter 1: Situation Report . .7 Early Conditions . 7 Early British Experiences with Field SIGINT . 10 German Army and Air Force SIGINT Organizations . 11 U.S. Preparations for SIGINT Service in the West . 13 The Call of the Mediterranean . .16 Chapter 2: Beginnings in Northwest Africa . 19 Planning SIGINT Service in Operation TORCH . 19 Operation TORCH . 23 Tunisia: Organization for the Second Phase . 28 Action during January 1943 . 30 Chapter 3: Axis Initiative in February 1943 . 35 Axis Plans — Allied Expectations . 35 Allied Reversals, 14-17 February 1943 . 36 Through Kasserine Pass . 38 Recapitulation . 39 Two Opposing Army Groups . 40 Chapter 4: The March Offensives . 45 Expectations . 45 II Corps Attacks: Gafsa, Maknassy, and El Guettar . 46 The Enemy Retreat to the Bridgehead . 48 Chapter 5: The Final Phase of Tunisia . .51 Summary . .51 The Attack Begins . 51 The End in Tunisia . 52 Page iii Chapter 6: From Africa to Europe . .57 Decisions in 1943 . .57 French Aid . 58 Beginnings of the 849th Signal Intelligence Service . 58 Detachments and Detachments . 61 SIGINT Before Operation HUSKY . 64 “J” Service . 66 Invading Sicily . 66 Allies Push — Enemy Pulls Out . 69 Some Results . 71 Chapter 7: Salerno to Rome . 75 Preliminaries . 75 Operations AVALANCHE . 76 Enemy Strategy . 82 Tactical SIGINT Service . 82 In the “Winter Line” . 88 Operation SHINGLE at Anzio . 90 “Y” Service during the First Phase of Anzio . .91 From Landing to Stalemate . 93 The Liberation of Rome — 4 June 1944 . 95 Chapter 8: The Final Months in the Mediterranean Theater . .101 Pursuit to the Arno and Beyond . 101 Po Valley and Surrender . 102 Southern France: Operation DRAGOON . 105 PART TWO: WESTERN EUROPE Chapter 9: The Forming of Signal Intelligence Service, ETOUSA . 113 Derivation and Beginnings . 113 Planning in the Theater . 117 The Invasion Begins . .119 The Structure of SIS, ETOUSA . 120 Final Stage of Training in the United Kingdom . .124 Assignment of the SRI Companies . .125 Into Action . .126 Early Days for the Corps Signal Service Companies (RI) . 128 3rd Radio Squadron Mobile and Its Detachments . .133 Chapter 10: A Summary Version of the Campaigns in ETOUSA . .137 Page iv Chapter 11: Aspects of Collaboration in Special Intelligence . 143 Beginnings . .143 U.S. Navy Attempts to Produce Special Intelligence . .147 U.S. Army Preparations to Produce Special Intelligence . 150 The U.S. Army-GCCS Agreement in May 1943 . 152 The Friedman, McCormack, and Taylor Mission April to June 1943 . .157 Collaboration under the Army’s 17 May Agreement . .159 Later Collaboration between OP-20-G and GCCS . 164 Special Intelligence in the Invasion of Normandy — June 1944 . .165 Chapter 12: From Normandy to the Seine . 169 General Considerations . 169 The Breakout . .170 Circling the Enemy’s Southern Flank . 174 SIGINT and the Capture of Brest . 176 Chapter 13: To The Westwall . 179 Pursuit to the North . .179 Pursuit to the Moselle River . 182 Improvement in Enemy Cryptography . 185 Seventh Army . .187 Third Army Reaches Westwall . 187 Chapter 14: The Ardennes Offensive, 16 December 1944 to 20 January 1945 . 189 Situation at the Outset . 189 The Enemy Is Contained and Pushed Back . .191 SIGINT Coverage during the Ardennes Campaign . 192 Examples of SIGINT during the Enemy’s Advance . 195 Special Intelligence . 198 Example of “Y” SIGINT as the Attackers Withdrew . 199 Chapter 15: Winter and Spring Battles — 1944-1945 . 203 Through the Westwall to the Rhine . 203 The Bridge to Remagen . 204 Samples of Special Intelligence in March 1945 . 205 German Collapse . 205 Page v Chapter 16: Some General Considerations . 209 Appendixes A. Agreement between the War Department and G.C. & C.S. 17 May 1943 . 215 B. War Department Letter, “Intercept Directive,” 26 March 1943 . 221 C. HQ, ETOUSA Letter, “Operational Control of Signal Intelligence Service, ETOUSA,” 27 July 1943 . 223 D. War Department Letter, “Special Cryptanalytic Project in Signal Intelligence Service” . 225 E. HQ, ETOUSA Directive, “Organization of Field Detachments for Signal Intelligence Division,” 8 February 1944 . 229 F. HQ, ETOUSA Letter, “Operational Control and Technical Direction of Signal Intelligence and Signal Radio Intelligence Units,” 7 February 1945 . 231 G. U.S. Navy Department Agreement with the Admiralty, 1 October 1942 . 233 H. Excerpts from Reports by U.S. Army Ultra Representatives with Army field commands in the ETOUSA . 235 Part 1, Use of Ultra at 12th Army Group, 23 May 1945 . 235 Part 2, Ultra Intelligence at U.S. First Army, 21 May 1945 239 Part 3, Ultra and the Third Army, 28 May 1945 . 247 Part 4, Use of Ultra by Ninth U.S. Army, 27 May 1945 . 253 Part 5, Ultra and Its Use by XIX, TAC, 30 May 1945 . 257 Bibliography . 263 Illustrations Maps The Mediterranean Area . 6 Allied Invasion of Northwest Africa . 20 Battles in Tunisia . 34 The End in Tunisia . 50 Page vi Sicily . 55 Italy . 73 Operations in Italy . 92 Southern France — Operation DRAGOON . 106 Cross Channel Plan of Attack . 138 The Breakout from the Bocage Country . 173 Exploiting the Breakout . 175 Pursuit to the Westwall . 178 At the Westwall . 184 Ardennes and Roer River . 190 Across the Rhine . 207 Photographs Brigadier General Carter W. Clarke . 8 Brigadier General Carter W. Clarke and Colonel Alfred McCormack . 14 Captain Solomon Kullback . 15 Colonel George A. Bicher . 16 Captain Richard L. Downing . 59 First Lieutenant Herrick F. Bearce . 65 849th SIS Mediterranean Theater camouflaged intercept van 84 849th SIS Mediterranean Theater van interior intercept equipment . 87 849th SIS Mediterranean Theater intercept van with BG 342, BC 344, and S-36 receivers . 94 Brigadier General Telford Taylor . .116 Lieutenant Paul E. Neff . 117 Major Charles L. Allen . .124 U.S. Seventh Army van . 130 Captain Laurance F. Safford, USN . 145 Lieutenant Leo Rosen . 145 Captain Abraham Sinkov . 146 Alistair G. Denniston, Professior E.R. Vincent, and Brigadier John H. Tiltman . .147 Bombe deck, OP-20-G . 148 Commander Joseph Wenger . 149 Dr. Alan M. Turing . 151 William F. Friedman . 153 Brigadier General Harold G. Hayes . .154 Brigadier General W. Preston Corderman . .155 Sir Edward Travis . .156 Page vii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page viii Historian’s Introduction The volume at hand, Dr. George F. Howe’s American Signals Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe is important professional reading for those interested in cryptologic history or in World War II. The first historian for the National Security Agency was Captain Thomas Dyer, USN, who had made significant contributions in cryptanalysis during the war. When Dyer retired in 1954, NSA decided to hire a professional historian as his replacement. That was Dr. George F. Howe. Dr. Howe was born in Vermont in 1901, and received his Ph.D. from Harvard in 1926. He was a professor of history at the University of Cincinnati for the next two decades. In 1945 he joined the research and writing staff of the Army’s Historical Division. While in that position, he wrote Northwest Africa: Seizing the Initiative in the West, published in 1957 as part of the official series on World War II, commonly known to historians as the “Army’s green books.” At NSA Dr. Howe supervised a small staff in preparing a number of specialized histories as well as a general study of the Armed Forces Security Agency, NSA’s predecessor. Dr. Howe retired in 1971, although he was called back to assist part-time with several history projects. He passed away in 1988. It is fitting that, for his own major project at NSA, Dr. Howe chose to write about signals intelligence support in North Africa (and Western Europe), drawing on the expertise developed for the “green books” and adding to it a dimension he could not write about for unclassified publication in the 1950s. Dr. Howe’s book deals primarily with organizational matters for providing SIGINT support in combat. Thus, the reader will not find stories of high-level cryptanalysis underlying big decisions by famous leaders. In my estimation, by concentrating on the less flashy aspects of wartime support in favor of the background work, Dr. Howe has again added a dimension of great worth to our knowledge of SIGINT and of the war. The study of World War II SIGINT has concentrated, by and large, on ULTRA, the exploitation of high-grade cryptographic systems used by Germany and Japan, and the use of ULTRA material by senior wartime decision makers. This effort unquestionably is important for understanding the decisions and events of that terrible era, but the overwhelming focus on this aspect has resulted in a slightly skewed understanding. The production of ULTRA and its effective use depended on a strong and well-organized structure working in conjunction with now-legendary.
Recommended publications
  • Stanislaviv in the Face of the Polish-Soviet War 1939 Polish Garrison – Soviet Garrison
    Open Military Studies 2020; 1: 70–78 Research Article Maciej Franz* Stanislaviv in the face of the Polish-Soviet War 1939 Polish Garrison – Soviet Garrison https://10.1515/openms-2020-0107 Received Oct 07, 2020; accepted Dec 11, 2020 Abstract: In 1921-1939 Stanyslaviv was one the bigger polish garrisons. The approach of the war the reason for leaving the town by polish troops. In September of 1939 the garrison in Stanyslaviv was rather small, consisting of small logistic units. Until now the historians have been interested in the face of this particular garrison in those few September days of 1939th. This is an attempt to showcase the most important events that happened while the polish troops were stationed in town and were still trying to provide peace and safety it and its people. Keywords: Polish troops, polish campaign, 1939, Second World War The Polish campaign of 1939, as the first episode of World War II, was not the same in all parts of Poland. For the inhabitants of Stanislaviv and a significant part of the Stanislaviv Voivodeship, it did not turn out to be a war against the Third Reich, but Soviet aggression – it is another episode on the long list of Polish- Russian armed conflicts in history. For people who lived in the western, southern and northern provinces of the Second Polish Republic, the war immediately took on a normal appearance. Air raids by enemy planes began, as a result – bombing, and a few days later the front was changed. The symbols of those days were mass groups of soldiers moving through these territories, both Polish soldiers who had to defend their homeland and those Germans who sought to conquer the Polish state.
    [Show full text]
  • This Copy of the Thesis Has Been Supplied on Condition That Anyone Who
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2014 The British Way of War in North West Europe 1944-45: A Study of Two Infantry Divisions Devine, Louis Paul http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3014 Plymouth University All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author's prior consent. 1 THE BRITISH WAY OF WAR IN NORTH WEST EUROPE 1944-45: A STUDY OF TWO INFANTRY DIVISIONS By LOUIS PAUL DEVINE A thesis Submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Humanities May 2013 2 Louis Paul Devine The British Way of War in North West Europe 1944-45: A Study of two infantry divisions Abstract This thesis will examine the British way of war as experienced by two British Infantry Divisions - the 43rd ‘Wessex’ and 53rd ‘Welsh’ - during the Overlord campaign in North West Europe in 1944 and 1945. The main locus of research centres on the fighting components of those divisions; the infantry battalions and their supporting regiments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origination and Evolution of Radio Traffic Analysis: World War II
    DOCID: 3860741 UNCLASSIFIED The Origination and Evolution of Radio Traffic Analysis: World War II ( b ) ( 3 ) - E' . L . 86 - 3 6 ____I ··· Tb;• artitle it UNCLASSJF1ED OJrcept for the author's biography which is classified as marked. The bombing of the Philippines by the Japanese on 8 December 1941 came as a shock to the United States even though some Americans were braced for other attacks following the infamy of Pearl Harbor the previous day.1 After the near destruction of the U.S . fleet in Hawaii, the Japanese were focused on the rows of B-17s and P-40s parked neatly in the mid-day sun at Clark Field. MacArthur's air force was destroyed on the ground on that Monday afternoon without a fight. On that day, Lieutenant Howard W. Brown, a radio intelligence veteran attached to the Second Signal Service Company at Manila, changed the mission of the Army intercept unit from Japanese diplomatic to potentially more lucrative air force communications and began reconstructing the tactical military nets serving the attacking Japanese. Thus began U.S. Army radio traffic analysis in World War II. In Europe, our entry into the war spurred closer cooperation with British signals intelligence. Radio traffic analysis, as indeed the entire field of Sigint, was comprehensively developed by the British following more than two years of war with the Germans. Bletchley Park, home of Britain's Government Code and Cipher School (GC&CS), became the center of Allied Sigint efforts in World War II. This included the preparation and training of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of FRANCE (July 19 to August 29, 1944)
    THE BATTLE OF FRANCE (July 19 to August 29, 1944) N our last issue's review of the invasion battle 31. This breakthrough decided the entire cam­ we pointed out two remarkable facts. viz.• paign. Another wave of US troop. advanoe!l I (1) that only one major landing operation had east from Granville to Villedieu to CO-<lperate been carried out during the first six weeks, and with formatioJlB furt,her t.o the northeast ill (2) that the number of troops pumped into the protecting the left Bank of the main thruli,. comparatively narrow bridgehead was out of Several German attacks against this flank in the proportion to the area then at the disposal of the area of Tessy. VilJedieu. and Mortain. which u Allied Command. Although this seemed to indicate one time narrowed the American corridor of that General Eisenhower intended to concentrate Avranches to twenty kilometers. had to be aban. all hi' available forces for a push from this one doned, as the sout.hward advance of the Britilh bridgehead. the German High Command could not 2nd Army from the region of Caumont threatened be sure of that and had therefore to maintain con· the rear of the German divisioJlB. The fate of the siderable forces all along the far·Bung coasts of campaign in FTance was sealed: what was at stake Europe. a factor which limited the forces opposing now was no longer tbe fat.e of French territory the Normandy invaders and gave the Allies a vast but that of the German armiCl in France.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 18, ISSUE 2 Studies “Lessons learned” in WWI: The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917 Christian Stachelbeck The Battle of Arras in the spring of 1917 marked the beginning of the major allied offensives on the western front. The attack by the British 1st Army (Horne) and 3rd Army (Allenby) was intended to divert attention from the French main offensive under General Robert Nivelle at the Chemin des Dames (Nivelle Offensive). 1 The French commander-in-chief wanted to force the decisive breakthrough in the west. Between 9 and 12 April, the British had succeeded in penetrating the front across a width of 18 kilometres and advancing around six kilometres, while the Canadian corps (Byng), deployed for the first time in closed formation, seized the ridge near Vimy, which had been fiercely contested since late 1914.2 The success was paid for with the bloody loss of 1 On the German side, the battles at Arras between 2 April and 20 May 1917 were officially referred to as Schlacht bei Arras (Battle of Arras). In Canada, the term Battle of Vimy Ridge is commonly used for the initial phase of the battle. The seizure of Vimy ridge was a central objective of the offensive and was intended to secure the protection of the northern flank of the 3rd Army. 2 For detailed information on this, see: Jack Sheldon, The German Army on Vimy Ridge 1914-1917 (Barnsley: Pen&Sword Military, 2008), p. 8. Sheldon's book, however, is basically a largely indiscriminate succession of extensive quotes from regimental histories, diaries and force files from the Bavarian War Archive (Kriegsarchiv) in Munich.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Infantry Combat Training During the Second World War
    SHARPENING THE SABRE: CANADIAN INFANTRY COMBAT TRAINING DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR By R. DANIEL PELLERIN BBA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2007 BA (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2008 MA, University of Waterloo, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in History University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada © Raymond Daniel Ryan Pellerin, Ottawa, Canada, 2016 ii ABSTRACT “Sharpening the Sabre: Canadian Infantry Combat Training during the Second World War” Author: R. Daniel Pellerin Supervisor: Serge Marc Durflinger 2016 During the Second World War, training was the Canadian Army’s longest sustained activity. Aside from isolated engagements at Hong Kong and Dieppe, the Canadians did not fight in a protracted campaign until the invasion of Sicily in July 1943. The years that Canadian infantry units spent training in the United Kingdom were formative in the history of the Canadian Army. Despite what much of the historical literature has suggested, training succeeded in making the Canadian infantry capable of succeeding in battle against German forces. Canadian infantry training showed a definite progression towards professionalism and away from a pervasive prewar mentality that the infantry was a largely unskilled arm and that training infantrymen did not require special expertise. From 1939 to 1941, Canadian infantry training suffered from problems ranging from equipment shortages to poor senior leadership. In late 1941, the Canadians were introduced to a new method of training called “battle drill,” which broke tactical manoeuvres into simple movements, encouraged initiative among junior leaders, and greatly boosted the men’s morale.
    [Show full text]
  • Service in the United States Military 1909 William Q. Reno, Sr. Army
    MEN FOR OTHERS Service in the United States Military 1909 William Q. Reno, Sr. Army Lieutenant Veteran World War I 1923 Neal E. Fitzgerald Lieutenant Veteran World War II 1925 Joseph A. Mendryga KIA World War II Killed in action 1928 Paul J. Schafer Army Retired World War II Somewhere in 1929 Adam B. Kronk Army Lieutenant Veteran France "suffered injuries to his legs" World War II Battalion Surgeon 1931 Stephen M. Gillespie Army Major Veteran with the 1st Army on the Wetern Front; Bronze Star World War II Participated in D- Day with the 18th Infantry 1931 William M. Moynihan Army Major Veteran Regiment of the 1st Infantry Division 1932 James G. Andary Veteran World War II 1932 Raymond M. Andries Veteran World War II 1932 Elmer J. Barton Veteran World War II Updated: January 30, 2018 Page 1 of 114 MEN FOR OTHERS Service in the United States Military 1932 James C. Berg Veteran World War II World War II Dental Corps; Served in European Theater " … 1932 Robert E. Coleman Army Captain Veteran from the Beaches of Normandy to ... Bremen, as my four battle stars will attest." 1932 C. Creedon Veteran World War II 1932 William Janecek Army Veteran World War II Dental Corps Lieutenant 1932 William R. Mulleavy Veteran World War II Colonel 1932 Casimir J. Rozak Veteran World War II 1932 Ralph S. Sharkey Army Veteran World War II 1932 F. Sward Veteran World War II World War II Decorated Naval 1932 Dawson Taylor Navy Veteran Officer "radar school before he went to sea." 1932 W.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Overlord James Clinton Emmert Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2002 Operation overlord James Clinton Emmert Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Emmert, James Clinton, "Operation overlord" (2002). LSU Master's Theses. 619. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/619 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OPERATION OVERLORD A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Arts in The Interdepartmental Program in Liberal Arts by James Clinton Emmert B.A., Louisiana State University, 1996 May 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been completed without the support of numerous persons. First, I would never have been able to finish if I had not had the help and support of my wife, Esther, who not only encouraged me and proofed my work, but also took care of our newborn twins alone while I wrote. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Stanley Hilton, who spent time helping me refine my thoughts about the invasion and whose editing skills helped give life to this paper. Finally, I would like to thank the faculty of Louisiana State University for their guidance and the knowledge that they shared with me.
    [Show full text]
  • January 1945
    CHAPTER XVII - THE RULE OF WEATHER: UNCERTAIN - JANUARY 1945 (A) Narrative History The narrative story of the 461st Bombardment Group (H) for the month of January 1945 can be quickly told. It was another month of many combat crews and too few combat airplanes. It was a long month of rain, snow, driving winds, and seas of mud. It was a month of stand-downs, of bigger and better bond raffles, of growing importance of the Group Band, and of various types of staff meetings. Members of both the air and the ground echelons tried to keep their impatience, caused by the bad weather, partially under control by closely following the reduction of the German bulge on the Western Front in the Ardennes by the United Nations Armies, and the rapid advance of the Russian Armies across Poland and Hungary. The Russian drive was of special interest because the Russians either captured or eliminated five of the hottest targets left to the Fifteenth Air Force and the Group: The synthetic oil refineries at Blechhammer North, Blechhammer South, and Odertal in Germany; Oswiecim, Poland; and at Moravska Ostrava, Czechoslovakia. (B) Operations The bad weather of January was the worst in which the Group has operated since its arrival in the Mediterranean Theater of Operations. As compared to the fifteen missions in October, nineteen in November, and seventeen in December, the Group flew but eight missions during the month of January. A total of fifteen non-effective missions were planned during the month. Almost all of these were briefed and “scrubbed”. The missions were curtailed in number due both to the location and the kind of weather that prevailed in January.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLE-SCARRED and DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP in the MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial
    BATTLE-SCARRED AND DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP IN THE MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Steven Thomas Barry Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Allan R. Millett, Adviser Dr. John F. Guilmartin Dr. John L. Brooke Copyright by Steven T. Barry 2011 Abstract Throughout the North African and Sicilian campaigns of World War II, the battalion leadership exercised by United States regular army officers provided the essential component that contributed to battlefield success and combat effectiveness despite deficiencies in equipment, organization, mobilization, and inadequate operational leadership. Essentially, without the regular army battalion leaders, US units could not have functioned tactically early in the war. For both Operations TORCH and HUSKY, the US Army did not possess the leadership or staffs at the corps level to consistently coordinate combined arms maneuver with air and sea power. The battalion leadership brought discipline, maturity, experience, and the ability to translate common operational guidance into tactical reality. Many US officers shared the same ―Old Army‖ skill sets in their early career. Across the Army in the 1930s, these officers developed familiarity with the systems and doctrine that would prove crucial in the combined arms operations of the Second World War. The battalion tactical leadership overcame lackluster operational and strategic guidance and other significant handicaps to execute the first Mediterranean Theater of Operations campaigns. Three sets of factors shaped this pivotal group of men. First, all of these officers were shaped by pre-war experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • French 1St Army, 15 September 1914
    French 1st Army 15 September 1914 Commanding Officer: General Dubail 14th Corps: General Baret 27th Infantry Division: General Blazer 53rd Brigade: Colonel Chepey 75th Infantry Regiment 140th Infantry Regiment 14th Alpine Chasseur Battalion (Alpine Group) 54th Brigade: Colonel Rouvier 52nd Infantry Regiment 7th Alpine Chasseur Battalion (Alpine Group) Cavalry: 9th Hussar Regiment (1 sqn) Artillery: 2nd Artillery Regiment (RAC)(3 75mm groups) 1st Mountain Artillery Regiment (RAM)(1 btry 65mm) 2nd Mountain Artillery Regiment (RAM)(1 btry 65mm) Engineers: 14/1 Co., 4th Regiment 28th Infantry Division: General Sorbets 55th Brigade: Colonel Rabier 22nd Infantry Regiment 99th Infantry Regiment 56th Brigade: Colonel Hallouin 30th Infantry Regiment 11th B.A.C. (Alpine Group) Cavalry: 9th Hussars Regiment (1 sqn) Artillery: 54th Artillery Regiment (RAC)(3 75mm groups) 1st Mountain Artillery Regiment (RAM)(1 btry 65mm) Engineers: 14/2 Co., 4th Regiment Reserve Cavalry: 9th Hussar Regiment (4 sqns) Artillery: 54th Heavy Artillery Regiment (1st Group of 155 C.T.R. Epinal (2 155mm L guns & 2 120mm L guns) Engineers: 14/3, 14/6, 14/16, 14/21 Co., 4th Regiment D.T./8th 71st Reserve Division: General Kaufmant 141st Brigade: Colonel Keller 349th Infantry Regiment 358th Infantry Regiment 370th Infantry Regiment 142nd Brigade: Colonel Clause 217th Infantry Regiment 221st Infantry Regiment 309th Infantry Regiment Attached: 1 170th Infantry Regiment (4 bns) 41st Cyclist Pioneer Battalion 71st Cyclist Pioneer Battalion 43rd Cyclist Pioneer Battalion 50th Cyclist
    [Show full text]