Battle for the Ruhr: the German Army's Final Defeat in the West" (2006)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Battle for the Ruhr: the German Army's Final Defeat in the West Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Battle for the Ruhr: The rGe man Army's Final Defeat in the West Derek Stephen Zumbro Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Zumbro, Derek Stephen, "Battle for the Ruhr: The German Army's Final Defeat in the West" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2507. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2507 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BATTLE FOR THE RUHR: THE GERMAN ARMY’S FINAL DEFEAT IN THE WEST A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Derek S. Zumbro B.A., University of Southern Mississippi, 1980 M.S., University of Southern Mississippi, 2001 August 2006 Table of Contents ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1 RETREAT TO THE REICH.....................................................................................20 2 DESTROYING THE RUHR.....................................................................................67 3 INTO THE RHINELAND.......................................................................................107 4 CROSSING AT REMAGEN...................................................................................139 5 CROSSING AT WESEL.........................................................................................177 6 OPERATION VARSITY.........................................................................................215 7 BREAKOUT TOWARD THE EAST.....................................................................246 8 CLOSING THE RUHR POCKET..........................................................................307 9 SEALING THE TRAP............................................................................................357 10 DEATH IN THE EGGEGEBERGE.......................................................................391 11 REDUCING THE POCKET...................................................................................429 12 TOTAL COLLAPSE...............................................................................................477 13 DISINTEGRATION................................................................................................516 14 DEFEAT AND OCCUPATION.............................................................................549 EPILOGUE..............................................................................................................................582 REFERENCES.........................................................................................................................598 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................................................................................................620 ii APPENDIX A MAP 1: FRONT LINE, FEBRUARY 1945............................................................ 627 B MAP 2: ENCIRCLEMENT, MARCH 1945............................................................628 VITA........................................................................................................................................629 iii Abstract This chronicle describes the events concerning the retreat of Field Marshal Walter Model’s Army Group B from the invasion of Normandy in June, 1944 to it’s ultimate destruction in the Ruhr Pocket in April, 1945. The author focuses on the German perspective of the Second World War, and describes the experiences of former Wehrmacht soldiers, Volkssturm conscripts, Hitler Youth members, and civilians as they witnessed the collapse of the Third Reich. The study encompasses events in northwest Germany, primarily in the lower Rhineland and the Ruhr Valley, as Model’s army group was encircled and destroyed by Allied forces. Detailed accounts of the Ardennes Offensive in Belgium, penetrating the German frontier, and the subsequent capture of the Ludendorff Bridge reveal how the impending defeat was experienced by the German defenders. An examination of the subsequent courts martial and executions of German officers by Nazi officials following the loss of the bridge at Remagen exhibit the ruthlessness and the perverse system of justice within the Third Reich. The Allied crossings of the Rhine through Operations Varsity and Plunder are described by Wehrmacht survivors, local inhabitants and refugees, many of whom had fled the Ruhr industrial area to escape the Allied strategic bombing campaign only to find themselves caught in the vicious battles on the east bank of the river as Eisenhower prepared to launch the final drive toward Berlin. Interviews with former German soldiers portray the experience of becoming prisoners of the United States Army during the closing weeks of the conflict. Accounts from witnesses iv reveal how local inhabitants endured marauding bands of liberated prisoners and former slave laborers while experiencing defeat, anarchy and eventual occupation by the Allies. The narrative details the dissolution of Army Group B as American forces destroyed the remnants of the Wehrmacht units trapped within the pocket. Walter Model’s final days are portrayed through interviews with the sole surviving staff officer who accompanied him as they evaded Allied forces until the field marshal chose suicide over surrender, and ended his life in a forest south of Duisburg, Germany on 21 April, 1945. v Introduction In late April, 1945, the German economic and military infrastructure was in the final throes of total collapse. The Anglo-American armies stood at the Elbe River, awaiting the imminent encirclement of Berlin by Soviet forces. Far to the south, SS General Karl Wolf was negotiating the surrender of all German forces in Italy. Isolated pockets of German troops continued to exhibit signs of resistance, mostly in combating Soviet forces that were marching ever deeper into the frontiers of western Europe. Far to the west of the apocalyptic events taking place east of the Elbe, a tiny contingent of German soldiers on the Rhine, representing the last vestiges of Army Group B, were bringing their own participation in the war to an end. On the afternoon of 21 April, 1945, Field Marshal Walter Model, commander of the Wehrmacht’s once-formidable Army Group B, spoke briefly to a trusted staff officer before handing him an envelope containing a final letter to family members, a wedding ring, and several additional, personal possessions. He then walked a short distance into a densely wooded area south of the Ruhr city of Duisburg, drew his service pistol, and ended his life. This action also served to officially and irrevocably end the existence of Army Group B. Some two years previously, in early February, 1943, Germany had received the inconceivable announcement that Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus had surrendered the Wehrmacht’s Sixth Army at Stalingrad. At that time Model had remarked to his son, Hans-Georg Model, “a German field marshal doesn’t surrender...such a thing is not possible.” It was impossible to foresee the dramatic turning of the 1 course of the war, and Model could not have known that he, like Friedrich Paulus, would witness the total annihilation of his forces. Although not the primary focus of this work, by virtue of his position Walter Model remains a pivotal figure of this story. The enigmatic officer’s meteoric rise to field marshal was not without merit. On no less than five separate occasions he had been dispatched to save a collapsing front in Russia. Finally, in late summer 1944, Model found himself again sent into a chaotic situation to save Wehrmacht forces from irrecoverable defeat. The field marshal’s last command spanned a period of eight months, during which Model’s battered divisions conducted an arduous and costly retreat across France and Belgium to the borders of the Reich. The narrative follows the fate of Model’s forces as they were pursued, methodically encircled and finally destroyed by Omar Bradley’s Twelfth Army Group and Bernard Montgomery’s Twenty- first Army Group over a period of eight months. This relatively short span of time saw the retreat across France to the borders of the Reich, Montgomery’s debacle at Arnhem, the vicious series of engagements in the Hürtgen Forest, the fall of Aachen, the Ardennes Offensive, the breaching of the Rhine, and finally the encirclement and destruction of the army group in the Ruhr Valley. By following Model we observe the final set of battles in the West and we are provided an insight as to how our own forces were viewed by a vanquished enemy. The GI’s of World War Two are widely accepted in our culture as citizen-soldiers who, when called upon, made selfless sacrifice in a successful, albeit costly endeavor to preserve our freedom. Yet a critical examination of how the American soldier waged this war through the eyes
Recommended publications
  • Winzergenossenschaft Mayschoß-Altenahr Auf Erfolgskurs Vorsitzender Rudolf Mies Berichtet Über Den Aufbruch Mit Dem Ziel Bester Qualität Im Jahre 1992
    Winzergenossenschaft Mayschoß-Altenahr auf Erfolgskurs Vorsitzender Rudolf Mies berichtet über den Aufbruch mit dem Ziel bester Qualität im Jahre 1992 Christine Schulze enn sich Rudolf Mies (59) im Kelterhaus Wder Winzergenossenschaft in Mayschoß umschaut, fallen dem langjährigen Geschäfts- führer und Vorsitzenden der Genossenschaft die alten Geschichten ein. Er fängt an zu er- zählen, wie die schweren Stahlträger über dem alten Kellergewölbe errichtet worden,die Maische-Gärtanks nach oben gehievt und die Speichertanks an der Traubenannahme instal- liert worden sind. Kellermeister Rolf Münster zeigt die Rohrleitungen, über die die Maische je nach Öchslegraden den unterschiedlichen Tanks - zwei Dutzend stehen in luftiger Höhe – zugeführt wird. Und er erklärt, mit welchen Methoden die Maische bewegt wird, damit dem Wein alle guten Farb- und Inhaltsstoffe zukom- men. Für die Genossenschaft hieß es investieren und noch einmal investieren. Seit 1993. Die Anstrengungen haben sich gelohnt. Preise und hohe Auszeichnungen sprechen für sich. „1992 war ein ganz fürchterlicher Jahrgang“, erinnert sich Mies an den Anlass fürs Umden- Vorsitzender Rudolf Mies (l.) und Kellermeister ken in puncto Weinproduktion. In dem Super- Rolf Münster (r.) im Edelstahltank-Keller Heimatjahrbuch Kreis Ahrweiler 2012 u 57 stahltanks, am Bahnhof Kreuzberg stationiert und gründlich ausgeschrubbt, wurden zum Re- servelager, in das bis Mitte März 1993 200.000 Liter Wein ausgelagert waren. Bei einem Kon- trollgang in dem bitterkalten Winter fanden Mies und Münster Eisschollen in einem tollen Extrakt schwimmen. Trauben für 1,65 Millionen Liter Wein hatten die Winzer damals angeliefert, wobei die Reb- fläche mit 112,5 Hektar deutlich kleiner war als die derzeit inklusive Walporzheim 140 Hektar, von denen 130 im Ertrag sind.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanislaviv in the Face of the Polish-Soviet War 1939 Polish Garrison – Soviet Garrison
    Open Military Studies 2020; 1: 70–78 Research Article Maciej Franz* Stanislaviv in the face of the Polish-Soviet War 1939 Polish Garrison – Soviet Garrison https://10.1515/openms-2020-0107 Received Oct 07, 2020; accepted Dec 11, 2020 Abstract: In 1921-1939 Stanyslaviv was one the bigger polish garrisons. The approach of the war the reason for leaving the town by polish troops. In September of 1939 the garrison in Stanyslaviv was rather small, consisting of small logistic units. Until now the historians have been interested in the face of this particular garrison in those few September days of 1939th. This is an attempt to showcase the most important events that happened while the polish troops were stationed in town and were still trying to provide peace and safety it and its people. Keywords: Polish troops, polish campaign, 1939, Second World War The Polish campaign of 1939, as the first episode of World War II, was not the same in all parts of Poland. For the inhabitants of Stanislaviv and a significant part of the Stanislaviv Voivodeship, it did not turn out to be a war against the Third Reich, but Soviet aggression – it is another episode on the long list of Polish- Russian armed conflicts in history. For people who lived in the western, southern and northern provinces of the Second Polish Republic, the war immediately took on a normal appearance. Air raids by enemy planes began, as a result – bombing, and a few days later the front was changed. The symbols of those days were mass groups of soldiers moving through these territories, both Polish soldiers who had to defend their homeland and those Germans who sought to conquer the Polish state.
    [Show full text]
  • Communal Commercial Check City of Aachen
    Eigentum von Fahrländer Partner AG, Zürich Communal commercial check City of Aachen Location Commune Aachen (Code: 5334002) Location Aachen (PLZ: 52062) (FPRE: DE-05-000334) Commune type City District Städteregion Aachen District type District Federal state North Rhine-Westphalia Topics 1 Labour market 9 Accessibility and infrastructure 2 Key figures: Economy 10 Perspectives 2030 3 Branch structure and structural change 4 Key branches 5 Branch division comparison 6 Population 7 Taxes, income and purchasing power 8 Market rents and price levels Fahrländer Partner AG Communal commercial check: City of Aachen 3rd quarter 2021 Raumentwicklung Eigentum von Fahrländer Partner AG, Zürich Summary Macro location text commerce City of Aachen Aachen (PLZ: 52062) lies in the City of Aachen in the District Städteregion Aachen in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia. Aachen has a population of 248'960 inhabitants (31.12.2019), living in 142'724 households. Thus, the average number of persons per household is 1.74. The yearly average net migration between 2014 and 2019 for Städteregion Aachen is 1'364 persons. In comparison to national numbers, average migration tendencies can be observed in Aachen within this time span. According to Fahrländer Partner (FPRE), in 2018 approximately 34.3% of the resident households on municipality level belong to the upper social class (Germany: 31.5%), 33.6% of the households belong to the middle class (Germany: 35.3%) and 32.0% to the lower social class (Germany: 33.2%). The yearly purchasing power per inhabitant in 2020 and on the communal level amounts to 22'591 EUR, at the federal state level North Rhine-Westphalia to 23'445 EUR and on national level to 23'766 EUR.
    [Show full text]
  • Interreg I / Ii : Cross-Border Cooperation
    INTERREG I / II : CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION Euregio Meuse-Rhine: implementation and management in practice Speech by Mr K.H. Lambertz - Chair of the Monitoring Committee for the Euregio Meuse-Rhine Interreg Programme - Director of Euregio Meuse-Rhine - Minister-President of the German-speaking community of Belgium 1. General background and geographical situation In 1974, the governors of the Dutch and Belgian provinces of Limburg, together with the Chief Executive of the Cologne county administration, acted on the proposal made to them by the future Queen of the Netherlands, Princess Beatrix, during an official visit to Maastricht, to draw up draft arrangements for an association under which even closer cross-border collaboration could develop, along the lines of the Dutch-German Euregio project that had been running since 1957. This initiative was part of the new Community direction in regional policy, which in 1975 was to be provided with an instrument to assist economic development called the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). In 1976, the principle of cross-border institutions was passed in law. Initially formed as an ad hoc association, the Euregio Meuse-Rhine was designed to promote integration between inhabitants on each side of the national borders. The area covers: • in Holland: the southern part of the Dutch province of Limburg; • in Germany: the city of Aachen, and the districts of Aachen, Heinsberg, Düren and Euskirchen, which make up the Aachen Regio, and • in Belgium: the entire province of Limburg. The province of Liège joined the Euregio Meuse-Rhine in 1978. In 1992, the German-speaking community of Belgium became the fifth partner in the Euregio Meuse- Rhine.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Valkyrie
    Operation Valkyrie Rastenburg, 20th July 1944 Claus Philipp Maria Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg (Jettingen- Scheppach, 15th November 1907 – Berlin, 21st July 1944) was a German army officer known as one of the leading officers who planned the 20th July 1944 bombing of Hitler’s military headquarters and the resultant attempted coup. As Bryan Singer’s film “Valkyrie”, starring Tom Cruise as the German officer von Stauffenberg, will be released by the end of December, SCALA is glad to present you the story of the 20 July plot through the historical photographs of its German collections. IClaus Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg 1934. Cod. B007668 2 Left: Carl and Nina Stauffenbergs’s wedding, 26th September 1933. Cod.B007660. Right: Claus Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg. 1934. Cod. B007663 3 Although he never joined the Nazi party, Claus von Stauffenberg fought in Africa during the Second World War as First Officer. After the explosion of a mine on 7th March 1943, von Stauffenberg lost his right hand, the left eye and two fingers of the left hand. Notwithstanding his disablement, he kept working for the army even if his anti-Nazi believes were getting firmer day by day. In fact he had realized that the 3rd Reich was leading Germany into an abyss from which it would have hardly risen. There was no time to lose, they needed to do something immediately or their country would have been devastated. Claus Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg (left) with Albrecht Ritter Mertz von Quirnheim in the courtyard of the OKH-Gebäudes in 4 Bendlerstrasse. Cod. B007664 The conspiracy of the German officers against the Führer led to the 20th July attack to the core of Hitler’s military headquarters in Rastenburg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origination and Evolution of Radio Traffic Analysis: World War II
    DOCID: 3860741 UNCLASSIFIED The Origination and Evolution of Radio Traffic Analysis: World War II ( b ) ( 3 ) - E' . L . 86 - 3 6 ____I ··· Tb;• artitle it UNCLASSJF1ED OJrcept for the author's biography which is classified as marked. The bombing of the Philippines by the Japanese on 8 December 1941 came as a shock to the United States even though some Americans were braced for other attacks following the infamy of Pearl Harbor the previous day.1 After the near destruction of the U.S . fleet in Hawaii, the Japanese were focused on the rows of B-17s and P-40s parked neatly in the mid-day sun at Clark Field. MacArthur's air force was destroyed on the ground on that Monday afternoon without a fight. On that day, Lieutenant Howard W. Brown, a radio intelligence veteran attached to the Second Signal Service Company at Manila, changed the mission of the Army intercept unit from Japanese diplomatic to potentially more lucrative air force communications and began reconstructing the tactical military nets serving the attacking Japanese. Thus began U.S. Army radio traffic analysis in World War II. In Europe, our entry into the war spurred closer cooperation with British signals intelligence. Radio traffic analysis, as indeed the entire field of Sigint, was comprehensively developed by the British following more than two years of war with the Germans. Bletchley Park, home of Britain's Government Code and Cipher School (GC&CS), became the center of Allied Sigint efforts in World War II. This included the preparation and training of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ahr and the Emergence of German Reds
    ©2010 Sommelier Journal. May not be distributed without permission. www.sommelierjournal.com The Ahr and the emergence of German reds CHRISTOPHER BATES, CWE t is not exactly breaking news that Germany to pass Müller-Thurgau to become the coun- has been making red wines able to stand try’s second-most-planted grape variety behind side by side with many of the world’s famous Riesling. While Müller-Thurgau production Ilabels. In 2006, a collector traded a bottle has declined since 1975, the percentage of Ger- of Domaine de la Romanée-Conti for a bottle of man vineyard land dedicated to Riesling has re- hans-Peter Wöhrwag’s 2003 Untertürkheimer mained incredibly stable at around 21%, while herzogenberg Pinot Noir from Württemberg. A the amount devoted to Spätburgunder has risen one-off, for sure, but it may also have been a hint from 3% to 12%. of things to come. In 2008, Decanter magazine Even though the current hype makes it easy named a German red wine the best in the world to think of Germany as a new red-wine-produc- for its variety, and again, it was a Pinot Noir: ing culture, red-grape plantings were document- Weingut Meyer-Näkel’s 2005 Spätburgunder ed here as early as 570 A.D., and Pinot Noir was Dernauer Pfarrwingert Grosses Gewächs. identified as early as 1318. It was not until 1435 Actually, nearly a third of German vine- that plantings of Riesling were first recorded. In yards are planted to red grapes. Spätburgunder, the Ahr, it is commonly believed that vines were as Pinot Noir is known in Germany, is about grown in Roman times, although the first docu- 56 January 31, 2010 Special Report Jean Stodden Recher Herr- enberg vineyard.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Tribunal, Indictments
    MILITARY TRIBUNALS Case No. 12 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -against- WILHELM' VON LEEB, HUGO SPERRLE, GEORG KARL FRIEDRICH-WILHELM VON KUECHLER, JOHANNES BLASKOWITZ, HERMANN HOTH, HANS REINHARDT. HANS VON SALMUTH, KARL HOL­ LIDT, .OTTO SCHNmWIND,. KARL VON ROQUES, HERMANN REINECKE., WALTERWARLIMONT, OTTO WOEHLER;. and RUDOLF LEHMANN. Defendants OFFICE OF MILITARY GOVERNMENT FOR GERMANY (US) NORNBERG 1947 • PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page INTRODUCTORY 1 COUNT ONE-CRIMES AGAINST PEACE 6 A Austria 'and Czechoslovakia 7 B. Poland, France and The United Kingdom 9 C. Denmark and Norway 10 D. Belgium, The Netherland.; and Luxembourg 11 E. Yugoslavia and Greece 14 F. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 17 G. The United states of America 20 . , COUNT TWO-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST ENEMY BELLIGERENTS AND PRISONERS OF WAR 21 A: The "Commissar" Order , 22 B. The "Commando" Order . 23 C, Prohibited Labor of Prisoners of Wal 24 D. Murder and III Treatment of Prisoners of War 25 . COUNT THREE-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST CIVILIANS 27 A Deportation and Enslavement of Civilians . 29 B. Plunder of Public and Private Property, Wanton Destruc­ tion, and Devastation not Justified by Military Necessity. 31 C. Murder, III Treatment and Persecution 'of Civilian Popu- lations . 32 COUNT FOUR-COMMON PLAN OR CONSPIRACY 39 APPENDIX A-STATEMENT OF MILITARY POSITIONS HELD BY THE DEFENDANTS AND CO-PARTICIPANTS 40 2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ INDICTMENT
    [Show full text]
  • From Charlemagne to Hitler: the Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire and Its Symbolism
    From Charlemagne to Hitler: The Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire and its Symbolism Dagmar Paulus (University College London) [email protected] 2 The fabled Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire is a striking visual image of political power whose symbolism influenced political discourse in the German-speaking lands over centuries. Together with other artefacts such as the Holy Lance or the Imperial Orb and Sword, the crown was part of the so-called Imperial Regalia, a collection of sacred objects that connotated royal authority and which were used at the coronations of kings and emperors during the Middle Ages and beyond. But even after the end of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, the crown remained a powerful political symbol. In Germany, it was seen as the very embodiment of the Reichsidee, the concept or notion of the German Empire, which shaped the political landscape of Germany right up to National Socialism. In this paper, I will first present the crown itself as well as the political and religious connotations it carries. I will then move on to demonstrate how its symbolism was appropriated during the Second German Empire from 1871 onwards, and later by the Nazis in the so-called Third Reich, in order to legitimise political authority. I The crown, as part of the Regalia, had a symbolic and representational function that can be difficult for us to imagine today. On the one hand, it stood of course for royal authority. During coronations, the Regalia marked and established the transfer of authority from one ruler to his successor, ensuring continuity amidst the change that took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Aachen Cathedral
    Aachen, Germany Marian Shrines Aachen Cathedral Aachen cathedral is the oldest cathedral of northern Europe. The oldest part, the octagon, beeing the palace chapel of Charles-the-Great was built about 790-800 AD in the Carolingian style. The church has been consecrated in honour of the Virgin Mary. Main attraction for pilgrims was the Miraculous Madonna “Our Lady Mary Emperor of Aachen” [6]. The statue now is positioned in the octagon right of the altar. In a private revelation of a soul in the region of Aachen end of the 20th Century, the following prayer was given together with a promise of Jesus. The prayer itself has the authorization of the past as well as the present Bishop of Aachen [10]: Ave Maria, Empress, Help of Christians pray for the Diocese consecrated you, especially for the bishop, all Priests and devotees and especially for a Christian Europe. Jesus' promise to the prayer "Ave Maria, Empress, Help of Christians!": "This prayer is precious. The more it is prayed, the more will shine my light on Aachen and Europe. This prayer is like a golden key that opens my and my mother’s heart and from there the rays of My grace and Her agency can come freely to you. The more and more this prayer is prayed, the more the darkness of Europe loses ground! And that because Aachen is and remains the intellectual point, from where I will renew the world in me. And by my mother, the help of the entire Christendom, yes indeed by the heavenly empress of the world! Pray this prayer and let it all pray as often as possible! World and Church need this prayer from Aachen, the key to the light! " The Aachen cathedral also is often called the “Imperial Cathedral” (in German: Kaiserdom).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory
    To Our Dead: Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory by Jeffrey P. Luppes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Germanic Languages and Literatures) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Andrei S. Markovits, Chair Professor Geoff Eley Associate Professor Julia C. Hell Associate Professor Johannes von Moltke © Jeffrey P. Luppes 2010 To My Parents ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a dissertation is a long, arduous, and often lonely exercise. Fortunately, I have had unbelievable support from many people. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor and dissertation committee chair, Andrei S. Markovits. Andy has played the largest role in my development as a scholar. In fact, his seminal works on German politics, German history, collective memory, anti-Americanism, and sports influenced me intellectually even before I arrived in Ann Arbor. The opportunity to learn from and work with him was the main reason I wanted to attend the University of Michigan. The decision to come here has paid off immeasurably. Andy has always pushed me to do my best and has been a huge inspiration—both professionally and personally—from the start. His motivational skills and dedication to his students are unmatched. Twice, he gave me the opportunity to assist in the teaching of his very popular undergraduate course on sports and society. He was also always quick to provide recommendation letters and signatures for my many fellowship applications. Most importantly, Andy helped me rethink, re-work, and revise this dissertation at a crucial point.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]