ESTIMATION of COMPONENT DESIGN WEIGHTS in CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE for TACTICAL Uavs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
LUH Clears 6 Kms Altitude Flight
www.aeromag.in n January - February 2019 | Vol 13 | Issue 1 LUH Clears 6 KMs Altitude Flight World’s Largest Importer, in association with Yet Indian Armed Forces Society of Indian Aerospace Technologies & Industries Need to be Better Equipped - Page 14 Official Media Partner Feb 20 - 24, 2019. Yelahanka Air Force Station, Bangalore Advertise with AEROMAG Show Dailies 1 Total Air and Missile Defense Sky Capture BARAK 8 - Naval-based BARAK 8 - Land-based ARROW 2 - Anti-Ballistic ARROW 3 - Anti-Ballistic Air & Missile Defense Air & Missile Defense Missile Defense Missile Defense Full Spectrum of Integrated, Networked Meet us at AERO INDIA 2019 Air and Missile Defense Solutions to Defeat Hall B: B2.1, B2.2 Threats at Any Range and Altitude IAI offers a comprehensive range of Air and Missile Defense Systems for land and naval applications. From VSHORAD to long-range, to theater and exo-atmospheric systems against ballistic missiles. Our unique solutions, based on lessons derived from vast operational experience, incorporate state-of-the-art technology and full networking for the most effective System of Systems. The result: IAI’s solutions. www.iai.co.il • [email protected] 2 Total Air and Missile Defense Advertise with Official Show Dailies of AEROMAG AEROMAG OFFICIAL MEDIA PARTNER Sky Capture BARAK 8 - Naval-based BARAK 8 - Land-based ARROW 2 - Anti-Ballistic ARROW 3 - Anti-Ballistic Air & Missile Defense Air & Missile Defense Missile Defense Missile Defense Full Spectrum of Integrated, Networked Meet us at AERO INDIA 2019 AERO INDIA 2019 Air and Missile Defense Solutions to Defeat Hall B: B2.1, B2.2 Threats at Any Range and Altitude 20-24 FEBRUARY, BENGALURU IAI offers a comprehensive range of Air and Missile Defense Systems for land and naval applications. -
Creating a Competitive Environment for Defense Aerospace in a Protectionist Multipolar World: a Study of India and Israel
Beyond: Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 4 Article 1 Creating a Competitive Environment for Defense Aerospace in a Protectionist Multipolar World: A Study of India and Israel Shlok Misra Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Tanish Jain University of California San Diego, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/beyond Part of the Technology and Innovation Commons Recommended Citation Misra, Shlok and Jain, Tanish () "Creating a Competitive Environment for Defense Aerospace in a Protectionist Multipolar World: A Study of India and Israel," Beyond: Undergraduate Research Journal: Vol. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/beyond/vol4/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Beyond: Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Creating a Competitive Environment for Defense Aerospace in a Protectionist Multipolar World: A Study of India and Israel Cover Page Footnote Shlok Misra is an undergraduate at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach. He is currently pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Aeronautical Science, with a minor in Airline Operations and Business Administration. Shlok is passionate about using technology for enhancing airspace efficiency and safety. Shlok’s research also focuses on studying human factors to enhance aviation safety. Shlok is currently a Commercial Pilot with an instrument rating. Tanish Jain is an undergraduate at the University of California, San Diego. He is currently pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering, with a focus on Machine Learning and Controls. -
UAS – Low Hanging Fruit India Still to Pluck
01/21 UAS – Low Hanging Fruit India Still to Pluck Air Marshal Anil Chopra PVSM AVSM VM VSM (Retd) Director General, CAPS 22 April 2021 Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) began making unmanned aerial system (UAS) with the Fluffy target drone in 1970s, which was replaced by the reusable, subsonic, pilotless target aircraft Lakshya that first flew in 1985. Around 30 were produced and operated by all the services. The advanced version Lakshya-II was flight-tested in January 2012. In March 2017, Air Force version of Lakshya-II was flight tested. The Army-centric Nishant is a multi-mission UAS with day/night capability for battlefield surveillance and targeting, and was first flown in August 1996. DRDO claimed it equivalent of IAI’s Searcher. Finally only four were built. A wheeled version of the Nishant UAS, named “Panchi” is known to be under development. There are a large number of DRDO UAS projects since 1985, but what really counts is, what gets inducted into the Armed Forces. That number after nearly 45 years should have been much higher. DRDO’s Rustom Series Rustom-1 was evolved from Burt Rutan’s Long-EZ with 250 km range, for visual and radar surveillance. It was to be a tactical UAV with endurance of 12 hours, and made its first flight in November 2009. Rustom-H, is a larger UAV was with flight endurance of over 24 hours. TAPAS-BH- 201 (Rustom-2) Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) UAV has been derived from the National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL) LCRA (Light Canard Research Aircraft), and is meant to supplement the Heron UAVs in service. -
Security, Protracted Conflicts and the Role of Drones in Eurasia Note: the Term ‘Drone’ Is Used Interchangeably with ‘Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)’ in This Report
On the Edge Security, protracted conflicts and the role of drones in Eurasia Note: The term ‘drone’ is used interchangeably with ‘Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)’ in this report. Supported by a funding from the Foundation Open Society Institute in cooperation with the Human Rights Initiative of the Open Society Foundations. Drone Wars UK is a small British NGO established in 2010 to undertake research and advocacy around the use of armed drones. We believe that the growing use of remotely-controlled, armed unmanned systems is encouraging and enabling a lowering of the threshold for the use of lethal force as well as eroding well established human rights norms. While some argue that the technology itself is neutral, we believe that drones are a danger to global peace and security. We have seen over the past decade that once these systems are in the armoury, the temptation to use them becomes great, even beyond the constraints of international law. As more countries develop or acquire this technology, the danger to global peace and security grows. Published by Drone Wars UK Drone Wars UK Written by Joanna Frew Peace House, 19 Paradise Street January 2021 Oxford, OX1 1LD Design by Chris Woodward www.dronewars.net www.chriswoodwarddesign.co.uk [email protected] On the Edge | 1 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Ukraine and conflicts with Russian-backed separatists in Crimea and Donbas 5 Use of Drones in Crimea & the Donbas Armed Drones on the Horizon Russian and Separatist use of Drones Ukrainian Drones Russian and Separatists Drones 3 Georgia, South -
Ballistic, Cruise Missile, and Missile Defense Systems: Trade and Significant Developments, July-October 1995
Missile Developments BALLISTIC, CRUISE MISSILE, AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS: TRADE AND SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS, JULY-OCTOBER 1995 CONTENTS OVERVIEW, 158 BRAZIL CROATIA Saudi Arabia, 167 Internal Developments, 162 Internal Developments, 165 Taiwan, 167 AFGHANISTAN with with Internal Developments, 160 GERMANY Argentina, 160 Russia, 165 with Internal Developments, 167 France, Germany, Italy, United States, 165 Pakistan, 160 with Russia, and U.S., 163 CZECH REPUBLIC Australia and U.S., 160 ARGENTINA Germany, 164 with Brazil, 163, 164 with India, Israel, and PRC, 164 Belarus, NATO, Russia, and Canada, Netherlands, Spain, Brazil, 160 MTCR, 181 Ukraine, 161 and U.S., 164 Russia, 164 AUSTRALIA France, Italy, and United Ukraine, 164 ECUADOR Internal Developments, 160 Kingdom, 166 United States, 164 with with France, Italy, and U.S., 166 Azores and Slovakia, 161 Germany and U.S., 160 BRUNEI India, 167 Russia, 160 Internal Developments, 164 EGYPT Iraq, 168 Russia and Sweden, 161 with Japan and U.S., 168 CANADA Kuwait, 166 MTCR, 181 AZORES with PRC, 166 Netherlands and NATO, 168 with Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Spain, 166 Netherlands, NATO, and Ecuador and Slovakia, 161 and U.S., 164 United States, 166 U.S., 168 BAHRAIN CHILE Netherlands and U.S., 168 EUROPEAN UNION Internal Developments, 161 with Russia, 168 Internal Developments, 166 Mauritius, 164 Syria, 168 BELARUS United Kingdom, 165 FRANCE United States, 168 with with Czech Republic, NATO, COMMONWEALTH OF HUNGARY Brazil, 163 Russia, and Ukraine, 161 INDEPENDENT STATES with CIS, South Africa, -
Unmanned Ambitions
Unmanned Ambitions Security implications of growing proliferation in emerging military drone markets www.paxforpeace.nl Colophon juli 2018 PAX means peace. Together with people in conflict areas and concerned citizens worldwide, PAX works to build just and peaceful societies across the globe. PAX brings together people who have the courage to stand for peace. Everyone who believes in peace can contribute. We believe that all these steps, whether small or large, inevitably lead to the greater sum of peace. If you have questions, remarks or comments on this report you can send them to [email protected] See also www.paxforpeace.nl Authors Wim Zwijnenburg and Foeke Postma Editor Elke Schwarz Cover photo 13 Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 UAVs lined up in formation on a runway in 2017, © Bayhaluk / Wiki media Commmons / CC BY-SA 4.0 Graphic design Frans van der Vleuten Contact [email protected] We are grateful for the help and support of Dan Gettinger, Arthur Michel Holland, Alies Jansen, Frank Slijper, Elke Schwarz, and Rachel Stohl. Armament Research Services (ARES) was commissioned to provide technical content for this report. ARES is an apolitical research organisation supporting a range of governmental, inter-governmental, and non-governmental entities (www.armamentresearch.com) This report was made with the financial support of the Open Society Foundations. 2 PAX ♦ Unmanned Ambitions Contents 1. Executive Summary 4 2. Introduction 6 2.1 Dangerous Developments 6 2.2 Structure 7 3. Drone Capabilities and Markets 8 3.1 Expanding markets 9 3.2 Military market 10 4. Military Drone Developments 13 4.1 Drones on the battlefield 15 4.2 Loitering munitions 16 4.3 Other uses 16 5. -
Drones and Aerial Observation: New Technologies for Property Rights, Human Rights, and Global Development a Primer
July 2015 DRONES AND AERIAL OBSERVATION: NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT A PRIMER DRONES AND AERIAL OBSERVATION 1 © 2015 NEW AMERICA This report carries a Creative Commons license, which permits non-commercial re-use of New America content when proper attribution is provided. This means you are free to copy, display and distribute New America’s work, or include our content in derivative works, under the following conditions: ATTRIBUTION. NONCOMMERCIAL. SHARE ALIKE. You must clearly attribute the work to You may not use this work for If you alter, transform, or build upon New America, and provide a link back commercial purposes without this work, you may distribute the to www.newamerica.org. explicit prior permission from resulting work only under a license New America. identical to this one. For the full legal code of this Creative Commons license, please visit creativecommons.org. If you have any questions about citing or reusing New America content, please contact us. AUTHORS Konstantin Kakaes, a fellow at New America, edited this volume and wrote Chapters 1, 3, 8, and 10. Faine Greenwood, a field analyst at New America, wrote Chapters 4, 5, and 9. Mathew Lippincott and Shannon Dosemagen of Public Lab wrote Chapter 2. Patrick Meier of the Qatar Computing Research Institute and UAViators wrote Chapter 6. Serge Wich of Liverpool John Moores University wrote Chapter 7. ABOUT NEW AMERICA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS New America is dedicated to the renewal of Ameri- This primer was made possible by grants from Omidyar Net- can politics, prosperity, and purpose in the Digital work and Humanity United. -
EW Concepts and Tactics for Single Or Multiple UAS Over the Net-Centric Battlefield
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2009-09 General use of UAS in EW environment--EW concepts and tactics for single or multiple UAS over the net-centric battlefield Erdemli, Mustafa Gokhan. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/4512 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS GENERAL USE OF UAS IN EW ENVIRONMENT—EW CONCEPTS AND TACTICS FOR SINGLE OR MULTIPLE UAS OVER THE NET-CENTRIC BATTLEFIELD by Mustafa Gokhan Erdemli Thesis Co-Advisors: Edward Fisher Wolfgang Baer Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2009 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE General Use of UAS in EW Environment—EW 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Concepts and Tactics for Single or Multiple UAS over the Net-Centric Battlefield 6. AUTHOR(S) Mustafa Gokhan Erdemli 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. -
Porównanie Wybranych Platform
dr Błażej Sajduk Uniwersytet Jagielloński, [email protected] The UAV industry in the USA and Israel – a comparison of selected platforms Bezzałogowce, BSP, przemysł zbrojeniowy Unmanned Aerial Vechicles, UAV, defence industry Abstrakt Artykuł podejmuje temat amerykańskiego i izraelskiego przemysłu uzbrojonych bezzałogowych systemów powietrznych (BSP). Oba kraje są liderami w dziedzinie produkcji oraz bojowego wykorzystania BSP. Tekst składa się z pięciu części. Wprowadzenia, opisu głównych tendencji na rynkach łatających platform bezzałogowych, charakterystyki głównych podmiotów na rynku i ich produktów, omówienia struktury eksportu oraz zakończenia. Abstract The text deals with the problem of armed unmanned aerial defence industries in the USA and Israel, the global leaders in production and military use of unmanned platforms. The article consists of five sections: an introduction, a description of the main tendencies in the unamanned aircraft market, characterisitics of the main producers and their products, an overview of the export structure, and a summary. Amerykański i Izraelski przemysł latających systemów bezzałogowych – porównanie wybranych platform Współcześnie trudno wyobrazić sobie nowoczesne siły zbrojne pozbawione bezzałogowych systemów powietrznych (BSP), w tym również platform zdolnych do przenoszenia uzbrojenia i przeprowadzania działań ofensywnych. Często również podkreśla się ich ”mnożnikowy” charakter (ang. force multiplier), tzn. zdolność do zwiększenia możliwości pojedynczego człowieka/żołnierza korzystającego z tej technologii. -
Commission of Inquiry on Lebanon Pursuant to Human Rights Council Resolution S-2/1
REPORT of the Commission of Inquiry on Lebanon pursuant to Human Rights Council Resolution S-2/1 ADVANCED UNEDITED VERSION Geneva, 10 November 2006 Executive Summary 1. On 11 August 2006, at its second special session, convened to address the ongoing conflict in Lebanon, the Human Rights Council adopted resolution S-2/1, entitled “The grave situation of human rights in Lebanon caused by Israeli military operations”, in which it decided to “urgently establish and immediately dispatch a high-level commission of inquiry”. The mandate of the Commission, according to paragraph 7 of resolution S-2/1, is: (a) to investigate the systematic targeting and killings of civilians by Israel in Lebanon; (b) to examine the types of weapons used by Israel and their conformity with international law; and (c) to assess the extent and deadly impact of Israeli attacks on human life, property, critical infrastructure and the environment.” 2. On 1 September 2006, the President of the Human Rights Council, Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba, announced the nomination of Ambassador João Clemente Baena Soares, Judge Mohamed Chande Othman, and Professor Stelios Perrakis as members of the Commission of Inquiry. The Commission assembled in Geneva, together with its Secretariat, and began its work on 11 September. It agreed to report to the Council within two months. 3. In Geneva, the Commission held meetings with the President of the Human Rights Council, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Permanent Missions of Lebanon and Israel, UN agencies and NGOs. The Commission visited Lebanon from 23 September through 7 October, and 17 through 21 October. -
The Revista Aérea Collection
The Revista Aérea Collection Dan Hagedorn and Pedro Turina 2008 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Content Note................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series A: Aircraft...................................................................................................... 4 Series B: Propulsion............................................................................................. 218 Series C: Biography............................................................................................. 262 Series D: Organizations...................................................................................... -
Complete Guide Drones By
Complete Guide by Drones The air, sea, land defence decision-maker’s technology reference monitor. Established 1976 monitor. technology reference sea, land defence decision-maker’s The air, INTERNATIONAL: Supplement to issue 3/2008 Premonition or Logical Assumption? .V. Roe (Avro), Breguet, Curtiss, given in the earlier editions of Armada’s supple- Caproni, Convair, Dewoitine, Douglas, ments on drones, and we would not fall too short A Grumman, McDonnell, Fairchild, of the number of military aircraft manufacturers Fairey, Focke-Wulf, Handley-Page, Heinkel, of yesteryear. Laughead (Lockheed brothers’ original name), Ford, Hurel-Dubois, Messerschmitt, Maurane, The development of military aviation only North American, Nieuport, Latécoère, Polikar- started to soar during the Great War and went on pov, Republic, Rockwell, Sopwith, Saunders- to grow to the above-mentioned telephone Roe, Spad, De Havilland, Supermarine, Vought – directory situation until the Second World War. these illustrious names now belong to a long Then consolidations (as euphemistically put) gone past. The list is much longer and could fill a started to take place. Extraordinarily, the devel- phone directory, maybe two. opment of drones followed the same application pattern as that of piloted aircraft at the begin- Today, how many names are left in the defence ning of the last century. The first aircraft were aviation world? Fingers of only two hands suffice used as observation “apparatuses” (aircraft were to reckon them: Boeing, Dassault, Saab, Lock- initially referred to as “apparatus” in early main- heed Martin, Embraer, MiG, Eads, Sukhoi, BAE tenance manuals), particularly to spot enemy Systems, a few trainer aircraft manufacturers artillery movements.