Micitary P E -C Law R Xeview [1 N Y+ 0 the SIXTEENTH ANNUAL EDWARD H
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Origination and Evolution of Radio Traffic Analysis: World War II
DOCID: 3860741 UNCLASSIFIED The Origination and Evolution of Radio Traffic Analysis: World War II ( b ) ( 3 ) - E' . L . 86 - 3 6 ____I ··· Tb;• artitle it UNCLASSJF1ED OJrcept for the author's biography which is classified as marked. The bombing of the Philippines by the Japanese on 8 December 1941 came as a shock to the United States even though some Americans were braced for other attacks following the infamy of Pearl Harbor the previous day.1 After the near destruction of the U.S . fleet in Hawaii, the Japanese were focused on the rows of B-17s and P-40s parked neatly in the mid-day sun at Clark Field. MacArthur's air force was destroyed on the ground on that Monday afternoon without a fight. On that day, Lieutenant Howard W. Brown, a radio intelligence veteran attached to the Second Signal Service Company at Manila, changed the mission of the Army intercept unit from Japanese diplomatic to potentially more lucrative air force communications and began reconstructing the tactical military nets serving the attacking Japanese. Thus began U.S. Army radio traffic analysis in World War II. In Europe, our entry into the war spurred closer cooperation with British signals intelligence. Radio traffic analysis, as indeed the entire field of Sigint, was comprehensively developed by the British following more than two years of war with the Germans. Bletchley Park, home of Britain's Government Code and Cipher School (GC&CS), became the center of Allied Sigint efforts in World War II. This included the preparation and training of U.S. -
The German Military and Hitler
RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST The German Military and Hitler Adolf Hitler addresses a rally of the Nazi paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), in 1933. By 1934, the SA had grown to nearly four million members, significantly outnumbering the 100,000 man professional army. US Holocaust Memorial Museum, courtesy of William O. McWorkman The military played an important role in Germany. It was closely identified with the essence of the nation and operated largely independent of civilian control or politics. With the 1919 Treaty of Versailles after World War I, the victorious powers attempted to undercut the basis for German militarism by imposing restrictions on the German armed forces, including limiting the army to 100,000 men, curtailing the navy, eliminating the air force, and abolishing the military training academies and the General Staff (the elite German military planning institution). On February 3, 1933, four days after being appointed chancellor, Adolf Hitler met with top military leaders to talk candidly about his plans to establish a dictatorship, rebuild the military, reclaim lost territories, and wage war. Although they shared many policy goals (including the cancellation of the Treaty of Versailles, the continued >> RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST German Military Leadership and Hitler (continued) expansion of the German armed forces, and the destruction of the perceived communist threat both at home and abroad), many among the military leadership did not fully trust Hitler because of his radicalism and populism. In the following years, however, Hitler gradually established full authority over the military. For example, the 1934 purge of the Nazi Party paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), helped solidify the military’s position in the Third Reich and win the support of its leaders. -
Antwerp Text
SECOND WORLD WAR TH 60ANNIVERSARY The Advance from the Seine to Antwerp 25 August – 30 September 1944 ‘The days of rapid advance across North West Europe’ No.6 The Advance from the Seine to Antwerp ANTWERP, BELGIUM NETHERLANDS London• NORTH SEA Berlin• BELGIUM GERMANY Paris• FRANCE NETHERLANDS London KEY FACTS • Ostend • • Antwerp Antwerp is: Calais • • Brussels • The second largest city in Belgium BELGIUM Le Havre • The second largest harbour in Europe • FRANCE • Located at the inner point of the Scheldt estuary • Paris • 69 km (43 miles) from the North Sea Cover image: British infantry advance past a destroyed 88 mm anti-aircraft gun IWM B 9982 THE ADVANCE FROM THE SEINE TO ANTWERP | 1 Foreword by the Under Secretary of State for Defence and Minister for Veterans, Ivor Caplin MP This series of commemorative booklets is dedicated to those who fought for our freedom in World War Two. The booklets provide a detailed account of key actions of the war for those familiar with the period, as well as serving as an educational tool for younger people less familiar with the heroic actions of Allied Service personnel. In this, the sixth booklet in the series, we commemorate the way the Royal Navy and the RAF combined so effectively with the 21st Army Group and made such a rapid leap forward from the Seine to Antwerp. August 1944 presented the Allies with a unique opportunity to lunge like a rapier through German-held Belgium and the Netherlands and end the war in weeks rather than months. To enable such a rapid advance, the well-fortified channel ports had to be cleared of German forces and opened up to Allied ships carrying the hundreds of tons of fuel and ammunition needed to sustain the effectiveness of the rapidly advancing Armour and Infantry. -
The War Hitler Won: the Battle for Europe, 1939-1941
Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies The War Hitler Won: The Battle for Europe, 1939-1941 Robert Citino "A Distinctive Language": The German Operational Pattern In the fall of 1939, the German army (Wehrmacht) began a run of decisive victories that was quite unlike anything in living military memory. With their fearsome tank (Panzer) formations operating as an apparently irresistible spearhead, and with a powerful air force (Luftwaffe) circling overhead, the Wehrmacht ran through or around every defensive position thrown in its path. The opening campaign in Poland (Case White) smashed the Polish army in 18 days, although a bit more fighting was necessary to reduce the capital, Warsaw.1 Equally 1 For Case White, begin with the belated "official history" commissioned by the Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsamt, Das Deutsche Reich und Der Zweite Weltkrieg, volume 2, Die Errichtung der hegemonie auf dem Europäischen Kontinent (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1979), especially "Hitler's Erster 'Blitzkrieg' und seine Auswirkungen auf Nordosteuropa," pp. 79-156. Labeling this "official history" is misleading--it is far more a meticulously researched critical history by a team of crack scholars. Robert M. Kennedy, The German Campaign in Poland, 1939, Department of the Army Pamphlet no. 20-255 (Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 1956) continues to dominate the field, and Matthew Cooper, The German Army, 1933-1945 (Chelsea, MI: Scarborough House, 1978), pp. 169-176, is still useful. Both Pat McTaggart, "Poland '39," Command 17 (July-August 1992), p. 57, and David T. Zabecki, "Invasion of Poland: Campaign that Launched a War," World War II 14, no. -
Ranking Us Army Generals of the Twentieth Century
ABSTRACT Title of thesis: RANKING U.S. ARMY GENERALS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY USING THE GROUP ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. Todd Philip Retchless, Master of Science 2005 Directed By: Professor Bruce Golden Department of Decision and Informatio n Technologies The group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) is a mathematically based decision making tool that allows groups of individuals to participate in the decision making process. In this thesis, we use the GAHP and the expert opinions of 10 pro fessional and amateur military historians to rank seven U.S. Army generals of the 20th Century. We use two methods to determine the priority vectors: the traditional eigenvector method and the recently introduced interval linear programming method. We co nsider the effects of removing outlier data and compare the rankings obtained by each method. RANKING U.S. ARMY GENERALS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY USING THE GROUP ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. By Todd Philip Retchless Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2005 Advisory Committee: Professor Bruce Golden, Chair Professor Edward Wasil Pr ofessor Charles D. Levermore © Copyright by Todd Philip Retchless 2005 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv List of Figures .............................................................................................................. -
Omar Bradley's View of Airpower A
The commander of the 12th Army Group didn’t need wild declarations about how airpower helped win the war in Europe. The results spoke for themselves. was none other than Army Gen. Omar N. Bradley, four-star commander of 12th Army Group. Today it’s uncommon for senior ground commanders to spend time and resources analyzing airpower’s role at the opera- tional level of war. This was not the case in 1945. Writing up airpower’s scorecard was deemed a vital task—so much so, it had to be completed before forces rotated back to the United States. As American airpower starts its third decade in action in US Central Com- mand, it is instructive to look back at how air superiority, interdiction, recon- naissance, and lift affected the war in Omar Bradley’s View of Airpower t the end of World War II, By Rebecca Grant the US Army brass in Eu- rope sang the praises of airpower. For the first time, Aairpower influenced the design for major campaigns—and made a difference in the tactical outcomes of battles from Normandy to Remagen, Germany. Lost in dense volumes of after-action analyses was one of the most unusual and compelling reports ever written on airpower. The report, titled “Effect of Air Power on Military Operations: Western Europe,” was authored by Army ground officers. The Air Effects Committee of 12th Army Group consisted of Army infantry officers drawn from the air branches of G-3 (operations) and G-2 (intelligence) of 12th Army Group. The man who signed off on the report on July 15, 1945, in Wiesbaden, Germany, 78 AIR FORCE Magazine / October 2010 Europe—and why the Army valued idea was to evaluate airpower at the David N. -
Order of Battle 21 Army Group 01.06.44 ]
6 June 2020 [ORDER OF BATTLE 21 ARMY GROUP 01.06.44 ] Home Forces British Troops Scottish Northern South Eastern Northern Ireland Command Command Command 55th (West Lancashire) 52nd (Lowland) 9th 61st 45th Infantry Division Infantry Division Armoured Division Infantry Division Infantry Division * 48th (South Midland) Infantry Division * Hampshire & Dorset 77th NOTES: Western Command, Eastern District Holding Division $ Command and Southern Command did 76th not have any formations under Infantry Division * th command. 38 (Welsh) * = Reserve formations Infantry Division $ = The 77th Holding Division was under 80th War Office Control Infantry Division * 35th Tank Brigade * ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Page 1 6 June 2020 [ORDER OF BATTLE 21 ARMY GROUP 01.06.44 ] Order of Battle st 21 Army Group 21st Army 1 June 1944 Group Invasion of France (D-Day) 2nd Army 1st Canadian Army See Next Page II Canadian I Airborne Corps Corps 4th Canadian 79th Armoured 1st Special Service 1st Airborne Armoured Division Division * Brigade $ Division 2nd Canadian Infantry 4th Special Service 6th Airborne Division Brigade $ Division # * = Assault Formations on D-Day st 1 Polish Armoured # = Assault formation on D -1. Came under Division command of I Corps on landing $ = Assault formations on D-Day, came under command of I Corps. ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Page 2 6 June 2020 [ORDER OF BATTLE 21 ARMY GROUP 01.06.44 ] 2nd Army I Corps VIII Corps XII Corps XXX Corps rd 3 Guards Armoured 43rd (Wessex) 7th Armoured Infantry Division * Division Infantry Division -
Airpower and Ground Armies : Essays on the Evolution of Anglo-American Air Doctrine
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Airpower and ground armies : essays on the evolution of Anglo-American air doctrine. 1940- 1943/ editor, Daniel R Mortensen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Air power-Great Britain-History. 2. Air power-United States-History. 3. World War, 1939-1945- Aerial operations, British, 4. World War, 1939-1945-Aerial operations, American. 5. World War, 1939-1945-Campaigns-Africa, North. 6. Operation Torch. I. Mortensen, Daniel R. UG635.G7A89 1998 358.4’03-dc21 97-46744 CIP Digitize December 2002 from 1998 Printing NOTE: Pagination changed Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Table of Contents Page DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................................... i FORWARD........................................................................................................................ iii ABOUT THE EDITOR .......................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. vi GETTING TOGETHER ......................................................................................................1 -
A Short History of Army Intelligence
A Short History of Army Intelligence by Michael E. Bigelow, Command Historian, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Introduction On July 1, 2012, the Military Intelligence (MI) Branch turned fi fty years old. When it was established in 1962, it was the Army’s fi rst new branch since the Transportation Corps had been formed twenty years earlier. Today, it remains one of the youngest of the Army’s fi fteen basic branches (only Aviation and Special Forces are newer). Yet, while the MI Branch is a relatively recent addition, intelligence operations and functions in the Army stretch back to the Revolutionary War. This article will trace the development of Army Intelligence since the 18th century. This evolution was marked by a slow, but steady progress in establishing itself as a permanent and essential component of the Army and its operations. Army Intelligence in the Revolutionary War In July 1775, GEN George Washington assumed command of the newly established Continental Army near Boston, Massachusetts. Over the next eight years, he dem- onstrated a keen understanding of the importance of MI. Facing British forces that usually outmatched and often outnumbered his own, Washington needed good intelligence to exploit any weaknesses of his adversary while masking those of his own army. With intelligence so imperative to his army’s success, Washington acted as his own chief of intelligence and personally scrutinized the information that came into his headquarters. To gather information about the enemy, the American com- mander depended on the traditional intelligence sources avail- able in the 18th century: scouts and spies. -
World War Ii Veteran’S Committee, Washington, Dc Under a Generous Grant from the Dodge Jones Foundation 2
W WORLD WWAR IIII A TEACHING LESSON PLAN AND TOOL DESIGNED TO PRESERVE AND DOCUMENT THE WORLD’S GREATEST CONFLICT PREPARED BY THE WORLD WAR II VETERAN’S COMMITTEE, WASHINGTON, DC UNDER A GENEROUS GRANT FROM THE DODGE JONES FOUNDATION 2 INDEX Preface Organization of the World War II Veterans Committee . Tab 1 Educational Standards . Tab 2 National Council for History Standards State of Virginia Standards of Learning Primary Sources Overview . Tab 3 Background Background to European History . Tab 4 Instructors Overview . Tab 5 Pre – 1939 The War 1939 – 1945 Post War 1945 Chronology of World War II . Tab 6 Lesson Plans (Core Curriculum) Lesson Plan Day One: Prior to 1939 . Tab 7 Lesson Plan Day Two: 1939 – 1940 . Tab 8 Lesson Plan Day Three: 1941 – 1942 . Tab 9 Lesson Plan Day Four: 1943 – 1944 . Tab 10 Lesson Plan Day Five: 1944 – 1945 . Tab 11 Lesson Plan Day Six: 1945 . Tab 11.5 Lesson Plan Day Seven: 1945 – Post War . Tab 12 3 (Supplemental Curriculum/American Participation) Supplemental Plan Day One: American Leadership . Tab 13 Supplemental Plan Day Two: American Battlefields . Tab 14 Supplemental Plan Day Three: Unique Experiences . Tab 15 Appendixes A. Suggested Reading List . Tab 16 B. Suggested Video/DVD Sources . Tab 17 C. Suggested Internet Web Sites . Tab 18 D. Original and Primary Source Documents . Tab 19 for Supplemental Instruction United States British German E. Veterans Organizations . Tab 20 F. Military Museums in the United States . Tab 21 G. Glossary of Terms . Tab 22 H. Glossary of Code Names . Tab 23 I. World War II Veterans Questionnaire . -
List at £18.00 Saving £10 from the Full Published Price
Naval & Military Press Specialised Books for the Serious Student of Conflict NOW £5.99 NOW £9.99 NOW £5.99 NOW NOW £4.99 £18.00 NOW NOW £15.00 £27.50 NOW £4.99 NOW NOW £3.99 £5.99 NOW NOW £6.99 £6.99 NOW £3.99 NOW NOW £6.99 £9.99 military books at serious discounts NOW NOW £4.99 £14.99 NOW £4.99 NOW £4.99 NOW £6.99 166Issue A new “Westlake” classic A Guide to The British Army’s Numbered Infantry Regiments of 1751-1881 Ray Westlake An oversized 127 page softback published by The Naval & Military Press, September 2018. On Early Bird offer with this Booklist at £18.00 saving £10 from the full published price. Order No: 27328. This book, the first in a series of British Army ‘Guides’, deals with the numbered regiments that existed between 1751, when the British infantry was ordered to discard their colonels’ names as titles and be known in future by number only (1st Regiment of Foot, 2nd Regiment of Foot, etc), and 1881 when numerical designations were replaced by the now familiar territorial names such as the Hampshire Regiment or Middlesex Regiment. The book provides the formation date of each regiment, names of colonels prior to 1751, changes of title, battle honours awarded before 1881 and brief descriptions of uniform and badges worn. Helpful to the collector will be the badge authorisation dates included. With a view to further research, details of important published regimental histories have been noted. The numbering of infantry regiments reached 135 but, come the reforms of 1881, only 109 were still in existence. -
Dive Bomber and Ground Attack Units of the Luftwaffe 1933-45: V. 2 Free
FREE DIVE BOMBER AND GROUND ATTACK UNITS OF THE LUFTWAFFE 1933-45: V. 2 PDF Henry L. de Zeng IV,Douglas G. Stankey | 192 pages | 30 Jun 2013 | Crecy Publishing | 9781906537098 | English | Manchester, United Kingdom BN No Results Page | Barnes & Noble® This close-support Stuka unit fought principally in the southern sector of the Eastern Front in places like Stalingrad and the Caucasus. The early two Schlachtgeschwader 1 and 2 were abbreviated SchlG, the reformed Stukageschwader in were abbreviated SG. Schlachtgeschwader 2 "Immelmann" was formed on 18 October from Sturzkampfgeschwader 2. InStukageschwader 2 was transferred to the Eastern Front. On 26 JuneStuka Geschwader 2 attacked 60 Soviet tanks south of Grodnoand later discovered that only one T had been knocked out. During the rest of andthe inadequacy of dive-bombing tanks became more evident. The most effective way to assault tanks from the air would appear with SG 2 in During the attack, Oblt. During the spring of SG 2 worked up Dive Bomber and Ground Attack Units of the Luftwaffe 1933-45: v. 2 modified Ju 87 G-1 'tank-busters' armed with two Rheinmetall-Borsig 37mm Flak 18 guns mounted under each wing. Prototypes were first used against Russian landing craft in the Black Sea area. In March Rudel knocked out the first tank with the new Stuka. This was a dedicated tank-buster, with no secondary dive-bombing role. While II. By early II. By May the depleted II. By April Stab and II. At the end of Dive Bomber and Ground Attack Units of the Luftwaffe 1933-45: v.