Order of Battle 21 Army Group 01.06.44 ]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

6 June 2020 [ORDER OF BATTLE 21 ARMY GROUP 01.06.44 ] Home Forces British Troops Scottish Northern South Eastern Northern Ireland Command Command Command 55th (West Lancashire) 52nd (Lowland) 9th 61st 45th Infantry Division Infantry Division Armoured Division Infantry Division Infantry Division * 48th (South Midland) Infantry Division * Hampshire & Dorset 77th NOTES: Western Command, Eastern District Holding Division $ Command and Southern Command did 76th not have any formations under Infantry Division * th command. 38 (Welsh) * = Reserve formations Infantry Division $ = The 77th Holding Division was under 80th War Office Control Infantry Division * 35th Tank Brigade * ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Page 1 6 June 2020 [ORDER OF BATTLE 21 ARMY GROUP 01.06.44 ] Order of Battle st 21 Army Group 21st Army 1 June 1944 Group Invasion of France (D-Day) 2nd Army 1st Canadian Army See Next Page II Canadian I Airborne Corps Corps 4th Canadian 79th Armoured 1st Special Service 1st Airborne Armoured Division Division * Brigade $ Division 2nd Canadian Infantry 4th Special Service 6th Airborne Division Brigade $ Division # * = Assault Formations on D-Day st 1 Polish Armoured # = Assault formation on D -1. Came under Division command of I Corps on landing $ = Assault formations on D-Day, came under command of I Corps. ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Page 2 6 June 2020 [ORDER OF BATTLE 21 ARMY GROUP 01.06.44 ] 2nd Army I Corps VIII Corps XII Corps XXX Corps rd 3 Guards Armoured 43rd (Wessex) 7th Armoured Infantry Division * Division Infantry Division Division st th 51 (Highland) 11 Armoured 53rd (Welsh) 49th (West Riding) Infantry Division Division Infantry Division Infantry Division th th 4 Canadian 15 (Scottish) 59th (Staffordshire) 50th (Northumbrian) Armoured Division Armoured Division Infantry Division Infantry Division * rd th 3 Canadian 6 Guards 34th Tank 8th Armoured Infantry Division * Tank Brigade Brigade Brigade * th st 4 Armoured 31 Tank rd 33 Armoured Brigade Brigade Brigade 27th Armoured th 56 Infantry Brigade * Brigade * 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade * ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Page 3 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The German Military and Hitler
RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST The German Military and Hitler Adolf Hitler addresses a rally of the Nazi paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), in 1933. By 1934, the SA had grown to nearly four million members, significantly outnumbering the 100,000 man professional army. US Holocaust Memorial Museum, courtesy of William O. McWorkman The military played an important role in Germany. It was closely identified with the essence of the nation and operated largely independent of civilian control or politics. With the 1919 Treaty of Versailles after World War I, the victorious powers attempted to undercut the basis for German militarism by imposing restrictions on the German armed forces, including limiting the army to 100,000 men, curtailing the navy, eliminating the air force, and abolishing the military training academies and the General Staff (the elite German military planning institution). On February 3, 1933, four days after being appointed chancellor, Adolf Hitler met with top military leaders to talk candidly about his plans to establish a dictatorship, rebuild the military, reclaim lost territories, and wage war. Although they shared many policy goals (including the cancellation of the Treaty of Versailles, the continued >> RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST German Military Leadership and Hitler (continued) expansion of the German armed forces, and the destruction of the perceived communist threat both at home and abroad), many among the military leadership did not fully trust Hitler because of his radicalism and populism. In the following years, however, Hitler gradually established full authority over the military. For example, the 1934 purge of the Nazi Party paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), helped solidify the military’s position in the Third Reich and win the support of its leaders.
[Show full text]
Operation Market Garden WWII
Operation Market Garden WWII Operation Market Garden (17–25 September 1944) was an Allied military operation, fought in the Netherlands and Germany in the Second World War. It was the largest airborne operation up to that time. The operation plan's strategic context required the seizure of bridges across the Maas (Meuse River) and two arms of the Rhine (the Waal and the Lower Rhine) as well as several smaller canals and tributaries. Crossing the Lower Rhine would allow the Allies to outflank the Siegfried Line and encircle the Ruhr, Germany's industrial heartland. It made large-scale use of airborne forces, whose tactical objectives were to secure a series of bridges over the main rivers of the German- occupied Netherlands and allow a rapid advance by armored units into Northern Germany. Initially, the operation was marginally successful and several bridges between Eindhoven and Nijmegen were captured. However, Gen. Horrocks XXX Corps ground force's advance was delayed by the demolition of a bridge over the Wilhelmina Canal, as well as an extremely overstretched supply line, at Son, delaying the capture of the main road bridge over the Meuse until 20 September. At Arnhem, the British 1st Airborne Division encountered far stronger resistance than anticipated. In the ensuing battle, only a small force managed to hold one end of the Arnhem road bridge and after the ground forces failed to relieve them, they were overrun on 21 September. The rest of the division, trapped in a small pocket west of the bridge, had to be evacuated on 25 September. The Allies had failed to cross the Rhine in sufficient force and the river remained a barrier to their advance until the offensives at Remagen, Oppenheim, Rees and Wesel in March 1945.
[Show full text]
Antwerp Text
SECOND WORLD WAR TH 60ANNIVERSARY The Advance from the Seine to Antwerp 25 August – 30 September 1944 ‘The days of rapid advance across North West Europe’ No.6 The Advance from the Seine to Antwerp ANTWERP, BELGIUM NETHERLANDS London• NORTH SEA Berlin• BELGIUM GERMANY Paris• FRANCE NETHERLANDS London KEY FACTS • Ostend • • Antwerp Antwerp is: Calais • • Brussels • The second largest city in Belgium BELGIUM Le Havre • The second largest harbour in Europe • FRANCE • Located at the inner point of the Scheldt estuary • Paris • 69 km (43 miles) from the North Sea Cover image: British infantry advance past a destroyed 88 mm anti-aircraft gun IWM B 9982 THE ADVANCE FROM THE SEINE TO ANTWERP | 1 Foreword by the Under Secretary of State for Defence and Minister for Veterans, Ivor Caplin MP This series of commemorative booklets is dedicated to those who fought for our freedom in World War Two. The booklets provide a detailed account of key actions of the war for those familiar with the period, as well as serving as an educational tool for younger people less familiar with the heroic actions of Allied Service personnel. In this, the sixth booklet in the series, we commemorate the way the Royal Navy and the RAF combined so effectively with the 21st Army Group and made such a rapid leap forward from the Seine to Antwerp. August 1944 presented the Allies with a unique opportunity to lunge like a rapier through German-held Belgium and the Netherlands and end the war in weeks rather than months. To enable such a rapid advance, the well-fortified channel ports had to be cleared of German forces and opened up to Allied ships carrying the hundreds of tons of fuel and ammunition needed to sustain the effectiveness of the rapidly advancing Armour and Infantry.
[Show full text]
The Rhine River Crossings by Barry W
The Rhine River Crossings by Barry W. Fowle Each of the Allied army groups had made plans for the Rhine crossings. The emphasis of Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) planning was in the north where the Canadians and British of Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomery's 21st Army Group were to be the first across, followed by the Ninth United States Army, also under Montgomery. Once Montgomery crossed, the rest of the American armies to the south, 12th Army Group under General Omar N. Bradley and 6th Army Group under General Jacob L. Devers, would cross. On 7 March 1945, all that Slegburg changed. The 27th Armored Infantry Battalion, Combat Beuel Command B, 9th Armored Division, discovered that the Ludendorff bridge at 9th NFANR " Lannesdorf I0IV R Remagen in the First Army " Mehlem Rheinbach area was still standing and Oberbachem = : kum h RM Gelsd srn passed the word back to the q 0o~O kiVl 78th e\eaeo Combat Command B com- INP L)IV Derna Ahweile Llnz mander, Brigadier General SInzig e Neuenahi Helmershelm William M. Hoge, a former G1 Advance to the Rhine engineer officer. General 5 10 Mile Brohl Hoge ordered the immediate capture of the bridge, and Advance to the Rhine soldiers of the 27th became the first invaders since the Napoleonic era to set foot on German soil east of the Rhine. Crossings in other army areas followed before the month was. over leading to the rapid defeat of Hitler's armies in a few short weeks. The first engineers across the Ludendorff bridge were from Company B, 9th Armored Engineer Battalion (AEB).
[Show full text]
OPERATION OVERLORD: the INVASION OPERATION NEPTUNE: the LANDING Gen
X u DAY, MONTH XX, 2014 XXXXPAPER’SNAMEXXXX u xxxxwebsitexxx OPERATION OVERLORD: THE INVASION OPERATION NEPTUNE: THE LANDING Gen. Dwight D Eisenhower Supreme Allied Commander English Channel Gen. Montgomery 21st Army Group England is 116 miles north (10 sq. mi. grid) Lt. Gen. Bradley Lt. Gen. Dempsey U.S. First Army British Second Army U.S. VII Corps U.S. V Corps British XXX Corps British I Corps Cherbourg 90th & 4th 1st & 29th 50th Infantry 3rd Infantry 51st Infantry 6th Airborne 82nd Infantry Div.’s Infantry Div.’s Division Division Division Division Airborne Vologones 6:30 a.m. 6:30 a.m. 7:25 a.m. 7:55 a.m. 7:25a.m. 12 - 3 a.m. Division Troops: Troops: Troops: Troops: Troops: Part of 709th Infantry 23,250 34,250 24,970 21,400 28,845 13,000 Allied Division Casualties: Casualties: Casualties: Casualties: Casualties: paratroopers About 300 About 2,400 About 400 About 1,200 About 630 and gliders St. Mere Eglise UTAH 101st Airborne Pointe 243rd 91st Division -du-Hoc Infantry Infantry OMAHA 12 - 3 a.m. Division Division Part of GOLD JUNO 13,000 Allied paratroopers SWORD and gliders Bayeux 352nd 6th Parachute Infantry Regiment Division MAP KEY Beachheads 711th Infantry Area held by June 12 DY CAEN Division Combat ship AN Landing craft M R Saint Lo 716th O Field Marshal Erwin Rommel Infantry C-47 Skytrain N Paris is 124 miles southeast German Army Group B 21st Division 30th Mobile Panzer Airborne troops Division Gen. Dollmann Gen. H. Von Salmuth Division German battery VII Army XV Army ENGLAND JUNE 6 1944 ★ JUNE 6 2014 INVASION ( TIMELINE London Southampton Plymouth Portsmouth 0000 (Midnight) » First air- borne troops begin to land.
[Show full text]
Ranking Us Army Generals of the Twentieth Century
ABSTRACT Title of thesis: RANKING U.S. ARMY GENERALS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY USING THE GROUP ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. Todd Philip Retchless, Master of Science 2005 Directed By: Professor Bruce Golden Department of Decision and Informatio n Technologies The group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) is a mathematically based decision making tool that allows groups of individuals to participate in the decision making process. In this thesis, we use the GAHP and the expert opinions of 10 pro fessional and amateur military historians to rank seven U.S. Army generals of the 20th Century. We use two methods to determine the priority vectors: the traditional eigenvector method and the recently introduced interval linear programming method. We co nsider the effects of removing outlier data and compare the rankings obtained by each method. RANKING U.S. ARMY GENERALS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY USING THE GROUP ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. By Todd Philip Retchless Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2005 Advisory Committee: Professor Bruce Golden, Chair Professor Edward Wasil Pr ofessor Charles D. Levermore © Copyright by Todd Philip Retchless 2005 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ..............................................................................................................
[Show full text]
British Second Army at Normandy
U.S. and British Army Task Organization Operation OVERLORD: 6 June 1944 21st Army Group LONDON 6 Jun 1944 ANNEX A: Task Organization to Operation OVERLORD 21st Army Group Gen Bernard L. MONTGOMERY U.S. First Army LtGen Omar N. BRADLEY VII Corps UTAH Beach MajGen J. Lawton COLLINS 4th Infantry Division MajGen Raymond O. BARTON 82nd Airborne Division MajGen Matthew B. RIDGWAY 101st Airborne Division MajGen Maxwell D. TAYLOR V Corps OMAHA Beach MajGen Leonard T. GEROW 1st Infantry Division MajGen Clarence R. HUEBNER 29th Infantry Division MajGen Charles H. GERHARDT British Second Army LtGen Sir Miles C. DEMPSEY I Corps SWORD Beach and JUNO Beach LtGen J.T. CROCKER 3rd London Infantry Division (REIN) MajGen Thomas G. RENNIE 3rd Canadian Infantry Division (REIN) MajGen R.F.L. KELLER 6th Airborne Division MajGen Richard N. “Windy” GALE 51st Highland Infantry Division MajGen D. Charles BULLEN-SMITH XXX Corps GOLD Beach LtGen G.C. BUCKNALL 50th Northumbrian Infantry Division (REIN) MajGen D.A.H. GRAHAM Prepared by: [email protected] 3rd London Division SHOREHAM 1 June 1944 ANNEX A: Task Organization to Operation OVERLORD 3rd London Division MajGen Thomas G. RENNIE (WIA 13 Jun), Brig E.E.E. CASS (13 Jun), MajGen L.G. “Bolo” WHISTLER (23 Jun) 8th Infantry Brigade Brig E.E.E. “Copper” CASS, LtCol M.A. FOSTER (13 Jun) Brig E.E.E. CASS (23 Jun) 1st Bn, The Suffolk Regiment LtCol R.E. “Dick” GOODWIN 2nd Bn, East Yorkshire Regiment LtCol C.F. HUTCHINSON (WIA 6 Jun), LtCol DICKSON 1st Bn, South Lancashire Regiment (Prince of Wales Volunteers) LtCol J.E.S.
[Show full text]
Omar Bradley's View of Airpower A
The commander of the 12th Army Group didn’t need wild declarations about how airpower helped win the war in Europe. The results spoke for themselves. was none other than Army Gen. Omar N. Bradley, four-star commander of 12th Army Group. Today it’s uncommon for senior ground commanders to spend time and resources analyzing airpower’s role at the opera- tional level of war. This was not the case in 1945. Writing up airpower’s scorecard was deemed a vital task—so much so, it had to be completed before forces rotated back to the United States. As American airpower starts its third decade in action in US Central Com- mand, it is instructive to look back at how air superiority, interdiction, recon- naissance, and lift affected the war in Omar Bradley’s View of Airpower t the end of World War II, By Rebecca Grant the US Army brass in Eu- rope sang the praises of airpower. For the first time, Aairpower influenced the design for major campaigns—and made a difference in the tactical outcomes of battles from Normandy to Remagen, Germany. Lost in dense volumes of after-action analyses was one of the most unusual and compelling reports ever written on airpower. The report, titled “Effect of Air Power on Military Operations: Western Europe,” was authored by Army ground officers. The Air Effects Committee of 12th Army Group consisted of Army infantry officers drawn from the air branches of G-3 (operations) and G-2 (intelligence) of 12th Army Group. The man who signed off on the report on July 15, 1945, in Wiesbaden, Germany, 78 AIR FORCE Magazine / October 2010 Europe—and why the Army valued idea was to evaluate airpower at the David N.
[Show full text]
Airpower and Ground Armies : Essays on the Evolution of Anglo-American Air Doctrine
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Airpower and ground armies : essays on the evolution of Anglo-American air doctrine. 1940- 1943/ editor, Daniel R Mortensen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Air power-Great Britain-History. 2. Air power-United States-History. 3. World War, 1939-1945- Aerial operations, British, 4. World War, 1939-1945-Aerial operations, American. 5. World War, 1939-1945-Campaigns-Africa, North. 6. Operation Torch. I. Mortensen, Daniel R. UG635.G7A89 1998 358.4’03-dc21 97-46744 CIP Digitize December 2002 from 1998 Printing NOTE: Pagination changed Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Table of Contents Page DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................................... i FORWARD........................................................................................................................ iii ABOUT THE EDITOR .......................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. vi GETTING TOGETHER ......................................................................................................1
[Show full text]
21St Army Group
21st Army Group 21st Army Group Active July, 1943 to August, 1945 United Kingdom Country Canada Poland Supreme Headquarters Allied Part of Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) Commanders Notable Bernard Montgomery commanders The 21st Army Group was a formation comprising British and Canadian forces stationed in the United Kingdom. who were assigned for the invasion of Europe. The formation was established in London in July 1943 under the command of Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF). The Group was an important Allied force in the European Theatre of World War II. The 21st Army Group operated in Northern France, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. Contents • 1 Normandy • 2 Advance into the Netherlands • 3 Operation Market Garden • 4 Battle of the Scheldt • 5 Battle of the Bulge • 6 Battle for the Roer Triangle • 7 Rhineland Campaign • 8 British Army of the Rhine • 9 Order of battle o 9.1 Attached U.S. units • 10 Notes • 11 References Normandy Commanded by General (later Field Marshal) Sir Bernard Montgomery, 21st Army Group initially controlled all ground forces in Operation Overlord. When sufficient American forces had landed, their own 12th Army Group was activated, under General Omar Bradley and the 21st Army Group was left with the British 2nd Army and the First Canadian Army under its control. Normandy was a battle of attrition for the British and Canadian armies, drawing in the available German reinforcements around Caen at the eastern end of the lodgement. The German Wehrmacht lacked the ability to prevent the American breakout at the western end of the Normandy beachhead in early August 1944, and the Germans were nearly enveloped at the Falaise and were routed.
[Show full text]
A Short History of Army Intelligence
A Short History of Army Intelligence by Michael E. Bigelow, Command Historian, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Introduction On July 1, 2012, the Military Intelligence (MI) Branch turned fi fty years old. When it was established in 1962, it was the Army’s fi rst new branch since the Transportation Corps had been formed twenty years earlier. Today, it remains one of the youngest of the Army’s fi fteen basic branches (only Aviation and Special Forces are newer). Yet, while the MI Branch is a relatively recent addition, intelligence operations and functions in the Army stretch back to the Revolutionary War. This article will trace the development of Army Intelligence since the 18th century. This evolution was marked by a slow, but steady progress in establishing itself as a permanent and essential component of the Army and its operations. Army Intelligence in the Revolutionary War In July 1775, GEN George Washington assumed command of the newly established Continental Army near Boston, Massachusetts. Over the next eight years, he dem- onstrated a keen understanding of the importance of MI. Facing British forces that usually outmatched and often outnumbered his own, Washington needed good intelligence to exploit any weaknesses of his adversary while masking those of his own army. With intelligence so imperative to his army’s success, Washington acted as his own chief of intelligence and personally scrutinized the information that came into his headquarters. To gather information about the enemy, the American com- mander depended on the traditional intelligence sources avail- able in the 18th century: scouts and spies.
[Show full text]
Military-Connected Awareness Guide
Military-Connected Awareness Guide General information for learning more about the military; including: the branches of the armed forces, customs and ways you can support military-connected people Contents overview (pg. 3) military terminology (pg. 4) the significance of the color purple (pg. 5) explaining the five military branches (pg. 6) explaining Reserves and National Guard (pg. 8) rank/rate: enlisted personnel, warrant officers, and commissioned officers (pg. 9) organization/chain of command (pg. 12) customs, courtesies and traditions (pg. 14) ideas to support and get involved (pg. 24) MILITARY-CONNECTED 101 This booklet was assembled from researching publications, online materials, and learning modules as part of the roll out the military-identifier program under ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) began in July 2017. It was important to learn the military culture landscape to uphold the best intent for supporting military-connected students in our district. The objective is to provide general information to share knowledge and an overview of the important historical foundation of our military. It is crafted with the utmost respect for our service members and desire to share the unique culture and special way of the armed forces for others that may be learning more about the military. For more resources regarding military-connected programs please visit our website: https://childservices.dpsk12.org/military-connected/ Useful Military Terminology B R A N C H O F MOS INSTALLATION S E R V I C E Military Occupational Army A base, camp, post, Specialty Air Force T H A T L E AstNat ioMnA, yNaUrdF, cAeCntTerU, oRrI N G This is the job a person S E E K S T O E L I M I N A T E Navy other activity under the has in the military.
[Show full text]