The 'New Left' and Democratic Governance in Latin America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 'New Left' and Democratic Governance in Latin America Cynthia J. Arnson Kenneth Roberts Leslie Bethell René Antonio Mayorga The ‘New Left’ and Robert Kaufman Felipe Agüero Ariel Armony Democratic Governance in Eric Hershberg Roberto Russell Latin America Edited by Cynthia J. Arnson with José Raúl Perales The ‘New Left’ and Democratic Governance in Latin America Cynthia J. Arnson Kenneth Roberts Leslie Bethell René Antonio Mayorga Robert Kaufman Felipe Agüero Ariel Armony Eric Hershberg Roberto Russell Edited by Cynthia J. Arnson with José Raúl Perales August 2007 The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, established by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a living national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mission is to commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by pro- viding a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan institution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publi- cations and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advi- sory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. The Center is the publisher of The Wilson Quarterly and home of Woodrow Wilson Center Press, dialogue radio and television, and the monthly news-letter “Centerpoint.” For more information about the Center’s activities and publications, please visit us on the web at www.wilsoncenter.org. Lee H. Hamilton, President and Director Available from : Latin American Program Board of Trustees Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Chair One Woodrow Wilson Plaza David A. Metzner, Vice Chair 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Public members: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; Bruce Cole, Washington, DC 20004-3027 Chair, National Endowment for the Humanities; Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Tamala L. www.wilsoncenter.org/lap Longaberger, designated appointee within the Federal Government; Condoleezza Rice, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; Cristián Samper, ISBN 1-933549-20-3 Acting Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Margaret Spellings, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education; Allen Weinstein, Archivist of the Cover photo: © Jorge Silva/Reuters/Corbis United States Supporters of Chilean presidential candidate Michelle Bachelet of the Private Citizen Members: Robert B. Cook, Donald E. Garcia, Socialist Party celebrate after presidential election results were Bruce S. Gelb, Sander Gerber, Charles L. Glazer, Susan Hutchison, released in Santiago, January 15, 2006. Ignacio E. Sanchez Contents 3 Introduction Cynthia J. Arnson 10 Conceptual and Historical Perspectives Kenneth Roberts Leslie Bethell René Antonio Mayorga 24 Political Economy and the ‘New Left’ Robert Kaufman 31 Politics and Society Felipe Agüero Ariel Armony Eric Hershberg 44 Foreign Policy Roberto Russell 50 About the Contributors | 1 | Introduction Cynthia J. Arnson1 s a result of over a dozen presidential elections held in Latin America from late 2005 to the end of 2006, the idea that a “new ALeft” has come to power has defined popular as well as scholarly understanding of political developments in the region. The outcomes of the 2006 presidential elections in Colombia, Peru, and Mexico demon- strated that a perceived hemispheric “swing to the left” in Latin America is by no means universal. Nonetheless, there is truth to the perception that an unprecedented number of current presidents or their followers define themselves as leftists or represent parties or party coalitions his- torically defined as on the Left—the Chilean Socialists, for example, or the Brazilian Partido do Trabalhadores (Worker’s Party) and the Uruguayan Frente Amplio (Broad Front). Taking into account Venezuela under Hugo Chávez (first elected in 1998), Brazil under Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2002 and 2006), Argentina under Néstor Kirchner (2003), Uruguay under Tabaré Vásquez (2004), Bolivia under Evo Morales (2005), Chile under Michele Bachelet (2006), Nicaragua under Daniel Ortega (2006), and Ecuador under Rafael Correa (2006), close to 60 percent of Latin America’s total population of 527 million live in countries governed by elected presidents to the left of the political spectrum. That said, the desire to characterize broad political trends has not necessarily deepened our understanding of how or why left governments have come to power, the nature of the political systems from which they emerge, the types of social coalitions supporting them, the kinds of poli- cies adopted by their leaders, or—most important of all— their impact on the future of democratic governance in the region. Analysts as well as policymakers have drawn a distinction between a “social democratic Left” (represented by Chile, Brazil, and Uruguay), and a “populist Left” | 3 | The ‘New Left’ and Democratic Governance in Latin America Introduction (represented by Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua, and, to a lesser strategies and others returning to past models of state control and eco- extent, Argentina), each with different implications for domestic as well nomic nationalism. With respect to the making of foreign policy, Roberto as foreign policy.2 Russell argues that the importance of ideological considerations should not As Kenneth Roberts argues in this report, however, such a dichotomy be exaggerated; presumed ideological affinities among countries of the fails to do justice to the diversity of left expression in contemporary Latin region do little to explain the persistent conflicts and tensions that exist. America, a diversity better understood in relationship to political develop- The principal divergences in foreign policy, Russell maintains, are more ments in the aftermath of neo-liberal structural adjustment in the 1990s. related to such issues as the density of linkages with the United States— Leslie Bethell, moreover, points out that being on the Left in Latin America something closely correlated with geographical proximity—and to the today means something different than it did in earlier historical periods degree of support for free trade agreements with the United States. (the 1930s, for example, or the years following the Cuban revolution). This publication—the first of the Latin American Program’s three- He questions whether populism itself is part of the Left, underscoring year project on “The ‘New Left’ and Democratic Governance in Latin examples of right-wing populism in the region as well as the antagonism America”—is based on presentations at a November 2006 workshop of historical populist leaders such as Brazil’s Getúlio Vargas or Argentina’s in Washington, D.C. Participants included Felipe Agüero, University of Juan Domingo Perón to the organized Left in those countries. René Miami and FLACSO-Chile; Ariel Armony, Colby College; Leslie Bethell, Mayorga, meanwhile, emphasizes the importance of institutional develop- Oxford University, UK; Javier Corrales, Amherst College; Eric Hershberg, ment, particularly that of party systems, as the key to making meaningful Social Science Research Council and Simon Fraser University, Canada; distinctions among left regimes. Today’s “neo-populism,” he argues, is Robert Kaufman, Rutgers University; Eugenio Lahera, Chile XXI; Juan Pablo characterized by a pattern of personalistic and anti-institutionalist politics Luna, Universidad Católica, Chile; René Mayorga, Centro Boliviano de not linked to a common set of economic policies, such as the import sub- Estudios Multidisciplinarios (CEBEM); Cynthia McClintock, The George stitution industrialization of the past.3 As Felipe Agüero indicates, however, Washington University; Kenneth Roberts, Cornell University; and Roberto questions of institutional design have not typically figured prominently Russell, Universidad Torcuato di Tella, Argentina.4 By exploring politi- on the agenda of the Left, despite an urgent need to do so on questions of cal trends and policy outcomes in eight countries—Argentina, Bolivia, citizen security and the fight against crime and violence. Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Uruguay, and Venezuela—the Project The deeper one delves, moreover, the more the differences surface. aims to understand why so many governments of the Left have come to Most analysts agree, for example, that President Hugo Chávez’s brand of power in Latin America at this particular moment in the region’s history, top-down political mobilization, outside of and antagonistic to the insti- and explore the impact of specific public policies in the areas of social tutions of liberal democracy, bears little resemblance to the kind of politi- welfare, citizen participation, human rights, and foreign relations. cal representation in Brazil, Chile, or Uruguay, where left parties have A working hypothesis is that the electoral outcomes of the past two moderated over time and participate fully in stable, competitive electoral years reflect widespread popular dissatisfaction with the failure of two de- systems. Even comparisons of supposedly similar regimes—the so-called cades of neo-liberal reform to deliver broadly-shared social benefits, as “radical populists”
Recommended publications
  • The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party Respond to the Crisis1
    All anti-neo-liberal now? The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party respond to the crisis1 Luke March University of Edinburgh [email protected] Paper for PSA 2013 Draft version 1.0. Work very much in progress. Please do not quote without author’s permission. Why has the left failed to benefit from the post-2008 economic crisis? This is a common, but perhaps slightly unfair question. It is difficult to see any one political family as a unique beneficiary, and indeed the right’s apparent earlier ideological hegemony has become unstuck with the ‘austerity medicine’ having consistently failed to revive the European patient. Nevertheless, there is still something remarkable about socio-economic conditions that should be a ‘perfect storm’ for left-wing politics regularly failing to produce anything like a clear boon for the left. The February 2013 Italian elections are just the latest that may mark a ‘no- confidence’ vote in the Centre-Left (McDonnell and Bobba 2013). The social democratic Democratic Party (PD) and its more leftist ally, the post-communist Left Ecology Freedom threw away an apparently unassailable lead to squeak ahead of the right and Beppe Grillo’s Five-Star Movement. This paper aims to contribute to answering this overarching question by comparing the policy and ideological response to the crisis undertaken by the three ‘left’ transnational party federations (TNPs) at European level, the Party of European Socialists (PES), European Green Party (EGP) and European Left Party (EL).2 Comparing the three TNPs is an apposite approach. Although TNPs are ‘timidly rising actors’, relatively weak formations that fall far short of being fully integrated parties, they at the very least aspire to a minimal level of ideological and policy co-ordination (Bardi 2004; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking Italy? Place Configurations and Italian Electoral Politics Under the ‘Second Republic’
    Modern Italy Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2007, pp. 17–38 Remaking Italy? Place Configurations and Italian Electoral Politics under the ‘Second Republic’ John Agnew The Italian Second Republic was meant to have led to a bipolar polity with alternation in national government between conservative and progressive blocs. Such a system it has been claimed would undermine the geographical structure of electoral politics that contributed to party system immobilism in the past. However, in this article I argue that dynamic place configurations are central to how the ‘new’ Italian politics is being constructed. The dominant emphasis on either television or the emergence of ‘politics without territory’ has obscured the importance of this geographical restructuring. New dynamic place configurations are apparent particularly in the South which has emerged as a zone of competition between the main party coalitions and a nationally more fragmented geographical pattern of electoral outcomes. These patterns in turn reflect differential trends in support for party positions on governmental centralization and devolution, geographical patterns of local economic development, and the re-emergence of the North–South divide as a focus for ideological and policy differences between parties and social groups across Italy. Introduction One of the high hopes of the early 1990s in Italy was that following the cleansing of the corruption associated with the party regime of the Cold War period, Italy could become a ‘normal country’ in which bipolar politics of electoral competition between clearly defined coalitions formed before elections, rather than perpetual domination by the political centre, would lead to potential alternation of progressive and conservative forces in national political office and would check the systematic corruption of partitocrazia based on the jockeying for government offices (and associated powers) after elections (Gundle & Parker 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE The Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum 4079 Albany Post Road, Hyde Park, NY 12538-1917 www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu 1-800-FDR- VISIT SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR INFORMATION CALL: CLIFFORD LAUBE at (845) 486-7745 C-SPAN’S NEW PRESIDENTIAL HISTORY SERIES “PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES: HISTORY UNCOVERED” TO DEBUT THIS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7 AT 8 PM ET FDR PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM, SEPTEMBER 14 WASHINGTON DC -- The first weekly segment of C-SPAN’s new series, produced with extensive assistance from the National Archives, will air on Friday, September 7, live from the Herbert Hoover Library. The Roosevelt Library segment will air on Friday, September 14. As the nation prepares to elect a new president in 2008, “Presidential Libraries: History Uncovered” will offer a “behind the scenes” look at the modern American presidency, featuring the most authoritative experts and historians, and never- before-seen resources from the National Archives twelve Presidential Libraries. Viewers will journey behind the exhibit halls of the Presidential Libraries to see the evolution of the modern presidency with extensive use of never- or rarely-seen film, video, private home movies, sound recordings, photographs, documents and artifacts collected from inside the Libraries' vaults. In addition, more than 1,000 rare recordings, identified for this series from the various Libraries' holdings, will be digitized by C- SPAN and made publicly available via the Internet. “The National Archives is very grateful to C-SPAN for recognizing the value and unique contributions that Presidential Libraries make to our collective memory. C-SPAN has culled our holdings and has unearthed new materials that will delight and inform viewers,” said Archivist of the United States Allen Weinstein.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Civil Society Works for a Democracy That Is Not Only More Representative
    ‘Civil society works for a democracy that is not only more representative but also more participatory’ CIVICUS speaks to Ramiro Orias, a Bolivian lawyer and human rights defender. Orias is a program officer with the Due Process of Law Foundation and a member and former director of Fundación Construir, a Bolivian CSO aimed at promoting citizen participation process for the strengthening of democracy and equal access to plural, equitable, transparent and independent judicial institutions. Q: A few days ago a national protest against the possibility of a new presidential re-election took place in Bolivia. Do you see President Evo Morales’ new re-election attempt as an example of democratic degradation? The president’s attempt to seek another re-election is part of a broader process of erosion of democratic civic space that has resulted from the concentration of power. The quest for a new presidential re-election requires a reform of the 2009 Constitution (which was promulgated by President Evo Morales himself). Some of the provisions introduced into the new constitutional text were very progressive; they indeed implied significant advances in terms of rights and guarantees. On the other hand, political reforms aimed at consolidating the newly acquired power were also introduced. For instance, there was a change in the composition and political balances within the Legislative Assembly that was aimed at over-representing the majority; the main authorities of the judiciary were dismissed before the end of their terms (the justices of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal were put to trial and forced to resign) and an election system for magistrates was established.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Chile | Freedom House
    Chile | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/chile A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 12 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Presidential elections in Chile are widely regarded as free and fair. The president is elected to a four-year term, and consecutive terms are not permitted. Piñera was elected in December 2017 to serve his second term; he had served as president previously, from 2010 to 2014. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The 2017 legislative polls were the first to take place under new rules that established more proportional districts, and increased the number of seats in both houses. The Chamber of Deputies now has 155 seats, up from 120 previously. The number of Senate seats was increased from 38 to 50, but the new seats will be introduced gradually, with the Senate reaching its new 50-seat capacity in 2022. Senators serve eight-year terms, with half up for election every four years, and members of the Chamber of Deputies are elected to four-year terms. Since 1990, congressional elections have been widely regarded as free and fair. A3. Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 4 / 4 Chile’s electoral framework is robust and generally well implemented. B. POLITICAL PLURALISM AND PARTICIPATION: 15 / 16 B1. Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? 4 / 4 Chile has a multiparty political system.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses
    Working Paper Series in European Studies Volume 1, Number 3 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses DR. SIMON HIX DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom ([email protected]) EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: GILLES BOUSQUET KEITH COHEN COLLEEN DUNLAVY ANDREAS KAZAMIAS LEON LINDBERG ELAINE MARKS ANNE MINER ROBERT OSTERGREN MARK POLLACK GREGORY SHAFFER MARC SILBERMAN JONATHAN ZEITLIN Copyright © 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. European Studies Program, International Institute, University of Wisconsin--Madison Madison, Wisconsin http://polyglot.lss.wisc.edu/eur/ 1 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses Simon Hix Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom Abstract As the European Union (EU) has evolved, the study agenda has shifted from ‘European integration’ to ‘EU politics’. Missing from this new agenda, however, is an understanding of the ‘cognitive constraints’ on actors, and how actors respond: i.e. the shape of the EU ‘political space’ and the location of social groups and competition between actors within this space. The article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the shape of the EU political space (the interaction between an Integration-Independence and a Left-Right dimension and the location of class and sectoral groups within this map), and tests this framework on the policy positions of the Socialist, Christian Democrat and Liberal party leaders between 1976 and 1994 (using the techniques of the ECPR Party Manifestos Group Project).
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • “Bringing Militancy to Management”: an Approach to the Relationship
    “Bringing Militancy to Management”: An Approach to the Relationship between Activism 67 “Bringing Militancy to Management”: An Approach to the Relationship between Activism and Government Employment during the Cristina Fernández de Kirchner Administration in Argentina Melina Vázquez* Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract This article explores the relationship between employment in public administration and militant commitment, which is understood as that which the actors themselves define as “militant management.” To this end, an analysis is presented of three groups created within three Argentine ministries that adopted “Kirchnerist” ideology: La graN maKro (The Great Makro), the Juventud de Obras Públicas, and the Corriente de Libertación Nacional. The article explores the conditions of possibility and principal characteristics of this activism as well as the guidelines for admission, continuing membership, and promotion – both within the groups and within government entities – and the way that this type of militancy is articulated with expert, professional and academic capital as well as the capital constituted by the militants themselves. Keywords: Activism, expert knowledge, militant careers, state. * Article received on November 22, 2013; final version approved on March 26, 2014. This article is part of a series of studies that the author is working on as a researcher at CONICET and is part of the project “Activism and the Political Commitment of Youth: A Socio-Historical Study of their Political and Activist Experiences (1969-2011)” sponsored by the National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion, Argentine Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation (2012-2015), of which the author is the director.
    [Show full text]
  • The XXI Century Socialism in the Context of the New Latin American Left Civilizar
    Civilizar. Ciencias Sociales y Humanas ISSN: 1657-8953 [email protected] Universidad Sergio Arboleda Colombia Ramírez Montañez, Julio The XXI century socialism in the context of the new Latin American left Civilizar. Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, vol. 17, núm. 33, julio-diciembre, 2017, pp. 97- 112 Universidad Sergio Arboleda Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=100254730006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas 17 (33): 97-112, Julio-Diciembre de 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22518/16578953.902 The XXI century socialism in the context of the new Latin American left1 El socialismo del siglo XXI en el contexto de la nueva izquierda latinoamericana Recibido: 27 de juniol de 2016 - Revisado: 10 de febrero de 2017 – Aceptado: 10 de marzo de 2017. Julio Ramírez Montañez2 Abstract The main purpose of this paper is to present an analytical approach of the self- proclaimed “new socialism of the XXI Century” in the context of the transformations undertaken by the so-called “Bolivarian revolution”.The reforms undertaken by referring to the ideology of XXI century socialism in these countries were characterized by an intensification of the process of transformation of the state structure and the relations between the state and society, continuing with the nationalization of sectors of the economy, the centralizing of the political apparatus of State administration.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bush Presidential Library National Security Affairs Office
    George Bush Presidential Library 1000 George Bush Drive West College Station, TX 77845 phone: (979) 691-4041 fax: (979) 691-4030 http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu [email protected] Inventory for FOIA Request 2013-0362-S [4] National Security Affairs Office Meetings Files Vice President Quayle Extent 768 folders Access Collection is open to all researchers. Access to Bush Presidential Records, Bush Vice Presidential Records, and Quayle Vice Presidential Records is governed by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)(5 USC 552 as amended) and the Presidential Records Act (PRA)(44 USC 22) and therefore records may be restricted in whole or in part in accordance with legal exemptions. Copyright Documents in this collection that were prepared by officials of the United States government as part of their official duties are in the public domain. Researchers are advised to consult the copyright law of the United States (Title 17, USC) which governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Provenance Official records of George Bush’s presidency and vice presidency are housed at the George Bush Presidential Library and administered by the 1 2013-0362-S [4] National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) under the provisions of the Presidential Records Act (PRA). Processed By Staff Archivists, April-May 2013. Previously restricted materials are added as they are released. System of Arrangement Records that are responsive to this FOIA request were found in the Quayle Vice Presidential Records: Staff and Office Files. As policy, Staff and Office Files are processed at the folder level, that is, individual documents are not selected and removed from a folder for processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue
    WILSON QUARTERLY AUTUMN / 1976 A NATIONAL REVIEW OS IDEAS AND INFORMATION f- __A WOOD80W WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER VW SCHOLARS SmitfisomanIwtitiaion Buildmf woffttagtonD£ WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Director, James H. Billington Deputy Director, George Packard Created by Act of Congress in 1968 as an institute for advanced study and as a "living memorial" to the 28th President, the Woodrow Wilson Center supports serious scholarship and its interaction with the world of affairs. The Center-and The Wilson Quarterly-seek diversity of scholarly enterprise and of points of view. THE WILSON QUARTERLY Editor, Peter Braestrup Deputy Editor, Timothy J. Adams Associate Editor (Periodicals), Philip S. Cook Associate Editor (Books),Lois Decker O'Neill Assistant Editor. Anna Marie Torres Contributing ~ditors,John Sharkey, John Burgess, David Hoffman Editorial Assistant, Georgiana Smith Research Associates. Michael Aiezza. John Milligan Librarian, Zdenek David Business Manager, William M. Dunn Circulation Consultant, Anne S. Keating Designer, Elizabeth Dixon Editorial Advisors, Prosser Gifford, Richard Seamon, S. Frederick Starr Published in January, April, July, and October by the Woodrow Wilson Inter- national Center for Scholars, Smithsonian Institution Building, Washington, D.C. 20560. Copyright 1976 by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Subscription rate: one year, $12. Foreign subscriptions, add $2 post- age per year. Single copies available upon request, $4; outside U.S. and pos- sessions, 84.50. Application to mail at second-class postage rates is pending at Washington, D.C. and additional mailing offices. Editorial offices, Smithsonian Institution Building, Washington, D.C. 20560. Send changes of address and all subscription correspondence to The Wilson Quarterly, P.O.
    [Show full text]