DOCSLIB.ORG

Download the Full Issue (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download the Full Issue (PDF) JULY/AUGUSTl 996 VOLUME XXV NUMBER 4 Sl . 50~.,o,_o_ - ... , DEMOCRATIC ,., , . ~ 6 AMA11.~ , ·X 523 1 06 1 PUBLISHED BY THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA -."" M 'Y . E D T 0 R A L DSA's Perspective on the 1996 Elections A STATEMENT FROM DSA's NATIONAL PouncAL COMMITTEE he key goal for progre.ssives an~ socialms in_t~e 1996 elec­ • supporting civil rights by defeating the California Civil T tions is to defeat the Republican right. To do thtS involv~ three Rights Initiative (which would actually take away key rights important usks: for people of color and women); • defeat Bob Dole; • advancing the principle of health care for all by support • retake Congre.ss from the Republicans; and for iniuatives on HMOs; and • enlarge and strengthen the Progressive Caucus in • strengthening the principle of a living wage for all by sup­ Congress. pon for the initiative rai~ing the minimum wage. To most of us on the le.ft the 1996 Presidential race offers little In addttion, the Progress Caucus has developed a •progressive in the way of hope for positive social and economic change. Polls today Prom1~e to America• which includes eleven agenda items from corporate suggest that President Clinton has a commanding lead. But it's far to early responsibility to a living wage to downsizing the military budget. In Wash­ to declare victory. And of course a Ointon victory would be a partial one ington, DSA has been working ~-ith the Caucus and the Committee on at best. Econoffilc Insecunty to develop public bearing~ on issues related w this Four years ago, Clinton won the Presidential election by fo­ agenda. These heanngs will focu.s on themes such as rebuilding communi­ cusing on the economy and it seems likely to be a key issue in this ties, fiscal policy and full empJ, •vment, women's economic empowerment election as well. Four years ago, however, 'the economy' meant simply and 'who really runs the US ccunomy.' These bearings, along with DSA's economic growth; today, it's broader - it's corporate responsibility, in­ own bearings project, form the bas.is for advancing a real progressive agenda ternational trade and economic insecurity. Economic growth over the in the next Congress - if it'~ a Coll£~' controlled by the Democrats and last few years hasn't resulted in more jobs or bener-paying jobs for the with a strong Progressive Caucus. American worker, but only higher CEO salaries and corporate profits. To achieve these goals, DSA is working hard to elect progres­ These are issues that Clinton isn't addressmg. sive candidates. The June meeting of DSA PAC voted to endorse mem­ Clinton's signing of the Republican welfare bill once more bers of the Progrc..ssive Caucus and some insurgent progressive challeng­ demonstrates that he bas abandoned some of the basic tenetS of Demo­ ers (a list of the endo~d candidates L' on page 21). In targeted races local cratic liberalism. His position can only be seen as a further retreat from volunteers from DSA will be helping candidates raise money, contact vot­ economic justice. The vote in the House on the final version of the bill ers and get out the vote. We'll also be working to educate voters on how - which pascd 328-101 - also shows the deep divisioru within the Demo­ their economic security is impacted by these elections. An organizing cratic Party, divLsions that amount to a class strut;glc. Almost as many manual is available from the n01tional office for locals and individual aetiv­ Democrats voted for the Republican bill as voted against it. istS with suggesuom about bow economic insecunty can be made a pow­ Today·the sole force operating 10 Congrc.s.s that could clearly erful election issue for progressive.\. have a positive effect on the left's agenda is the Progrc.~sive Caucus. Of The elections demonmate the ru-cngtb and weakness of the those 101 votes against the welfare bill, ~5 came from the Progressive American electoral system. Election campaigns provide one of the few Caucus. Underfunded and understaffed, it remains the only political forums in which we can discuss the irnponant political choices factng us, group speaking out with a constructive and compelling agenda. A strength­ but that discussion is often sidetracked by '.l<>und bites, attack ads and spe­ ened Progressive Caucus with 100, rather than its current 52 members, cious polling data. And most of the time the left, and in panicular DSA, is would be a fon:e to be reckoned with. h would be a fon:e that could move simply not a pan of the discussion at all. To change America -to achieve the the Democratic leadership and the party away from the ~-<Jut policies of thorough tnnsformation of our economy and 'O<"iety that we strive for - the Democratic Leadership Council. To make that happen, November's means changing American politics in a fundamental way. We must recreate election will have to result in new progressive members being elected to the possibility of true political interaction among Americans and between Congress and current progressives being re-elected. voters and candidates. We need to rebuild a leh and recharge social move­ The last two years have ~hown how much damage can be done ments '.I<> that we have a long term qraiegy for change that forms the basis when reactionaries control Congress and a weak Democrauc president for our immediate campaigns. allows himself to be pushed around. The liberal left in Washington is DSA won't be able to do all that in the course of the 1996 elec­ only now emerging from its shock at the Gingrich victory. It is begin­ uon. However, we can lay the groundwork for it. The reelection of ning to recognize the need not just to fight against the worst of the Cltnt0n, regaining Democratic control of Congress and election of a stron­ GOP proposals, but to set its own agenda. In ~ome states, notably in ger Progressive Caucus would not be a complete victory for the left, but it California, key parts of this agenda are also on the ballot: would provide the opening to make an authentically left. agenda happen . Dt•ocratlc Left• July/August 1996 • , ••• 2 DEMOCRATIC National Director Alan Charney cover: Unite.I Nacions Building, New York, NY; &ire of the 1996 Production meeting of the Sociafu1 lntemacional. Pholo by Margie Burns & Michele Rossi Clui.stopber Smit.h/lmpaet Visuals. Editorial Committee DSA's Perspective on the Joanne Barkan, 1996 Eledions: Dorothee Benz, AStatement from DSA's NPC Suzanne Crowell, David Glenn, Jeff Gold, Sherri Levine, Reising the Rose Lantern Steve Max, Maxine Phillips by Bogdon Denltch Founding Editor Michael Harrington (1928-1989) To Intensify Democracy by Pierre Schori Democratic Socialists of America share a vision of a humane interna­ tiomtl social order based on equitable distribution of resources, meaningful Constructing Global Labor Solidarity work, a healthy environment, sustain- able growth, gender and racial by Paul Garver equality, and non-oppressive relation­ ships. Equality, solidarity, and democracy can only be achieved through international political and Power to Win: The Struggle for social cooperation aimed at ensuring the NYC Uving Wage Bl that economic institutions benefit all people. We are dedicated to building by Miriam Bensman truly international social movements- of unionists, environmentalists, feminists, and people of color-which DSA Launches Center for together can elevate global justice Democratic Valves over brutalizing global competition. by Rick Perlstein http://www.dsausa.org/dsa Dernocr<1tic Ltft (ISSN 016403207) it publithed bimonthly at I SO DSAdlon Varick Street, New York, NY 10014. Second-duo postage p•id at New York, NY (Publication No. 0701-9602). Sub.criptiont: $8 re.:ular, Sl5 insmutional. Postmut<r. Send ,.Jdre,. change• to 180 Varick SLJ'Cet, New York, NY 10014. Democrl1lic ufi is publi•bed by the Democratic Socialim o( America, 180 Varick Strttt, New York, NY 10014. (212) 727-8610.Sig...,dAnicksncpms Present Progressive rh• opi ..ions of1he11utlJOY$d>1d run necl!SJl<ri~ rJ,_ ofth•orgam'zdt,,,.,,, by Alan Charney Democratic Left• July/August 1996 •page 3 Raising the Rose Lantern The Socialist International in Perspective BY B OGDAN DENITCH he Socialist International, as well as its pre­ THE END OF THE "COMMUNIST' decessors and rivals, has always been a fair INTERNATIONAL T representation of the state of the politically organized world left. This was the case with the The Cominform began to disintegrate even be­ premature First International, which Marx and fore the coll~pse of the Soviet Union as the state "social­ Engels set up in 1884, before there were any sub­ ist" Communist regimes in Eastern Europe. The larger stantial workers' and socialist parties, and before Communist parties ofltaly, Spain, France, and Great Brit­ there was any mass suffrage, so the issue of parlia­ ain began a painful evolution, then labelled mentary reformism was an abstract theoretical "Eurocommunist," from parties which were primarily proposition. pro-Soviet to workers' parties which The Second International, founded in 1889, were evolving into de facto social­ accurately represented the strengths and weaknesses democrattc parties. They committed The present Sodalist of the German Social Democratic Party, clearly the themselves to taking power democrati­ International has the leading mass social democratic party at the time. In cally throug~ parliamentary elec­ chance to become the those days before the first World War and the tions and defending "bourgeois" clearing house and Russian revolution there was no distinction made democratic rights. networking center for the between social-democratic and socialist pames-that This process, .which was to difference was a later Communist invention.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party Respond to the Crisis1
    All anti-neo-liberal now? The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party respond to the crisis1 Luke March University of Edinburgh [email protected] Paper for PSA 2013 Draft version 1.0. Work very much in progress. Please do not quote without author’s permission. Why has the left failed to benefit from the post-2008 economic crisis? This is a common, but perhaps slightly unfair question. It is difficult to see any one political family as a unique beneficiary, and indeed the right’s apparent earlier ideological hegemony has become unstuck with the ‘austerity medicine’ having consistently failed to revive the European patient. Nevertheless, there is still something remarkable about socio-economic conditions that should be a ‘perfect storm’ for left-wing politics regularly failing to produce anything like a clear boon for the left. The February 2013 Italian elections are just the latest that may mark a ‘no- confidence’ vote in the Centre-Left (McDonnell and Bobba 2013). The social democratic Democratic Party (PD) and its more leftist ally, the post-communist Left Ecology Freedom threw away an apparently unassailable lead to squeak ahead of the right and Beppe Grillo’s Five-Star Movement. This paper aims to contribute to answering this overarching question by comparing the policy and ideological response to the crisis undertaken by the three ‘left’ transnational party federations (TNPs) at European level, the Party of European Socialists (PES), European Green Party (EGP) and European Left Party (EL).2 Comparing the three TNPs is an apposite approach. Although TNPs are ‘timidly rising actors’, relatively weak formations that fall far short of being fully integrated parties, they at the very least aspire to a minimal level of ideological and policy co-ordination (Bardi 2004; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking Italy? Place Configurations and Italian Electoral Politics Under the ‘Second Republic’
    Modern Italy Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2007, pp. 17–38 Remaking Italy? Place Configurations and Italian Electoral Politics under the ‘Second Republic’ John Agnew The Italian Second Republic was meant to have led to a bipolar polity with alternation in national government between conservative and progressive blocs. Such a system it has been claimed would undermine the geographical structure of electoral politics that contributed to party system immobilism in the past. However, in this article I argue that dynamic place configurations are central to how the ‘new’ Italian politics is being constructed. The dominant emphasis on either television or the emergence of ‘politics without territory’ has obscured the importance of this geographical restructuring. New dynamic place configurations are apparent particularly in the South which has emerged as a zone of competition between the main party coalitions and a nationally more fragmented geographical pattern of electoral outcomes. These patterns in turn reflect differential trends in support for party positions on governmental centralization and devolution, geographical patterns of local economic development, and the re-emergence of the North–South divide as a focus for ideological and policy differences between parties and social groups across Italy. Introduction One of the high hopes of the early 1990s in Italy was that following the cleansing of the corruption associated with the party regime of the Cold War period, Italy could become a ‘normal country’ in which bipolar politics of electoral competition between clearly defined coalitions formed before elections, rather than perpetual domination by the political centre, would lead to potential alternation of progressive and conservative forces in national political office and would check the systematic corruption of partitocrazia based on the jockeying for government offices (and associated powers) after elections (Gundle & Parker 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Syriza: an Interview with Aristides Baltas
    THE RISE OF SYRIZA: AN INTERVIEW WITH ARISTIDES BALTAS This interview with Aristides Baltas, the eminent Greek philosopher who was one of the founders of Syriza and is currently a coordinator of its policy planning committee, was conducted by Leo Panitch with the help of Michalis Spourdalakis in Athens on 29 May 2012, three weeks after Syriza came a close second in the first Greek election of 6 May, and just three days before the party’s platform was to be revealed for the second election of 17 June. Leo Panitch (LP): Can we begin with the question of what is distinctive about Syriza in terms of socialist strategy today? Aristides Baltas (AB): I think that independently of everything else, what’s happening in Greece does have a bearing on socialist strategy, which is not possible to discuss during the electoral campaign, but which will present issues that we’re going to face after the elections, no matter how the elections turn out. We haven’t had the opportunity to discuss this, because we are doing so many diverse things that we look like a chicken running around with its head cut off. But this is precisely why I first want to step back to 2008, when through an interesting procedure, Synaspismos, the main party in the Syriza coalition, formulated the main elements of the programme in a book of over 300 pages. The polls were showing that Syriza was growing in popularity (indeed we reached over 15 per cent in voting intentions that year), and there was a big pressure on us at that time, as we kept hearing: ‘you don’t have a programme; we don’t know who you are; we don’t know what you’re saying’.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTION IN GREECE 7th July 2019 European New Democracy is the favourite in the Elections monitor Greek general election of 7th July Corinne Deloy On 26th May, just a few hours after the announcement of the results of the European, regional and local elections held in Greece, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA), whose party came second to the main opposition party, New Analysis Democracy (ND), declared: “I cannot ignore this result. It is for the people to decide and I am therefore going to request the organisation of an early general election”. Organisation of an early general election (3 months’ early) surprised some observers of Greek political life who thought that the head of government would call on compatriots to vote as late as possible to allow the country’s position to improve as much as possible. New Democracy won in the European elections with 33.12% of the vote, ahead of SYRIZA, with 23.76%. The Movement for Change (Kinima allagis, KINAL), the left-wing opposition party which includes the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK), the Social Democrats Movement (KIDISO), the River (To Potami) and the Democratic Left (DIMAR), collected 7.72% of the vote and the Greek Communist Party (KKE), 5.35%. Alexis Tsipras had made these elections a referendum Costas Bakoyannis (ND), the new mayor of Athens, on the action of his government. “We are not voting belongs to a political dynasty: he is the son of Dora for a new government, but it is clear that this vote is Bakoyannis, former Minister of Culture (1992-1993) not without consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses
    Working Paper Series in European Studies Volume 1, Number 3 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses DR. SIMON HIX DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom ([email protected]) EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: GILLES BOUSQUET KEITH COHEN COLLEEN DUNLAVY ANDREAS KAZAMIAS LEON LINDBERG ELAINE MARKS ANNE MINER ROBERT OSTERGREN MARK POLLACK GREGORY SHAFFER MARC SILBERMAN JONATHAN ZEITLIN Copyright © 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. European Studies Program, International Institute, University of Wisconsin--Madison Madison, Wisconsin http://polyglot.lss.wisc.edu/eur/ 1 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses Simon Hix Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom Abstract As the European Union (EU) has evolved, the study agenda has shifted from ‘European integration’ to ‘EU politics’. Missing from this new agenda, however, is an understanding of the ‘cognitive constraints’ on actors, and how actors respond: i.e. the shape of the EU ‘political space’ and the location of social groups and competition between actors within this space. The article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the shape of the EU political space (the interaction between an Integration-Independence and a Left-Right dimension and the location of class and sectoral groups within this map), and tests this framework on the policy positions of the Socialist, Christian Democrat and Liberal party leaders between 1976 and 1994 (using the techniques of the ECPR Party Manifestos Group Project).
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Democracy: Improvement Or Subversion
    First unedited draft, Comments very welcome Italy and Spain by Rafael López-Pintor & Leonardo Morlino University of Madrid and University of Florence To be presented at the Conference on “The Quality of Democracy: Improvement or Subversion?”, Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law & European Forum, Stanford Institute for International Studies, Stanford, October 10-11, 2003. Why Italy and Spain? The democratic quality of every European polity is worthwhile to be analyzed. The fact that most of European democracies are well established is not related, if not indirectly, to the ‘quality’ they are able to achieve. Thus, during last years meaningful assessments of some European democracy have been carried out. For example, one of the most relevant democratic assessment is that of United Kingdom recently carried out by Beetham and Weir (1999). In this perspective the decision of analyzing Italy and Spain has no strong theoretical or empirical reasons except the willingness of choosing not the old, stable democracies, but more recently established, large democratic polity in countries with previous authoritarian experiences in their more or less recent past. That is, our interest was rather directed toward European democracies that may be more problematic with regard to quality because of their political traditions. At the same time, Italy and Spain can be usefully contrasted as the Italian democratic installation and consolidation go back to the 1940’s and 1950’s whereas the Spanish ones are more recent and take place during the second part of 1970’s and early 1980’s. Such a comparison allow us to consider within the ‘ceteris paribus’ clause the size of the country with all related aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • XX Congress, Socialist Affairs (PDF)
    THE XX COTVGRESS THE WORLD ECONOMY: A COMMON RESPONSIBILITY The Socialist International held its Twentieth Congress at the headquarters of the United Nations in Netv York on 9-11 September 1996. More than one hundred and fifly parties and organisations from every continent took part. Some seven hundred delegates together with other parties of the United States and elsewhere represented the political parties social democratic orientation and from the UN diplomatic and organisations which belong invited to take part in the community brought the to the Socialist International Congress. Additional guests from numbers to around one thousand. Our venue, the General Assembly Hall of the United Nations, lent a particular DECISIONS OF T}IE XX CONGRESS REGARDING MEMBERS}IIP solemnity and symbolism to the CHANGE OF STATUS TO FULI MEMBERSHIP debates. ALBANIA: Social Democratic Party, PSD The XX SI Congress, which ALGERIA: Socialist Forces Front, FFS was opened by our president, CAPE VERDE: African Independence Party of Cape Verde, PAICV Pierre Mauroy (see page 4), had CHILE: Party for Democrary, PPD on its agenda three main CHILE: Socialist Party of Chile, PS themes: 'Markets serving people, HAITI: Party of the National Congress of Democratic Movements, KONAKOM not people serving markets', HUNGART Hungarian Socialist Party, MSZP peace, IVORY COAST Ivory Coast Popular Front, FPI 'Making keeping peace' MONGOLIA: Mongolian Social Democratic Party, MSDP and'A human rights agenda for NICAMGUA: Sandinista National Liberation Front, FSLN the twenty-first century'. Debating those themes were FULI MEMBENSHP social democratic leaders from ESTONIA: M66dukad around the world, some of MEXICO: Party of Democratic Revolution, PRD whose reflections are printed on POLAND: Social Democracy ofthe Republic of Poland, SdRP POLAND: Union of Labour, UP the preceding pages.
    [Show full text]
  • PROOF Contents
    PROOF Contents Acknowledgements viii 1 Survival and Renewal: The 1990s 1 2 Regroupment: Establishing a European Movement 29 3 The Party of the European Left 46 4 Diverse Trends: An Overview 66 5 A Successful Model? Die Linke (the Left Party – Germany) 83 6 How Have the Mighty Fallen: Partito della Rifondazione Comunista (Party of Communist Refoundation – Italy) 99 7 Back from the Brink: French Communism (Parti Communiste Français) Re-orientates 116 8 Communism Renewed and Supported: The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (the Czech Republic) 132 9 The Scandinavian Left 147 10 The European Left and the Global Left: 1999–2009 163 Notes 192 Index 204 vii PROOF 1 Survival and Renewal: The 1990s Almost two decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall, on the occasion of the German federal elections in September 2009, the International Herald Tribune marked the electoral victory of the German right with the headline, ‘Is socialism dying?’1 The German Social Democratic Party or the Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD) took 23% of the votes – its lowest poll since the Second World War – just months after the European elections registered a poor performance from left- wing candidates across the European Union (EU). As the article went on to observe, ‘Even in the midst of one of the greatest challenges to capitalism in 75 years, involving a breakdown of the financial sys- tem because of “irrational exuberance”, greed and the weakness of regulatory systems, European socialists and their leftist cousins have not found a compelling response, let alone taken advantage of the failures of the right.’ There is no doubt that across Europe the failure of the social demo- cratic parties to present a ‘compelling response’ to the economic crisis has led to a wave of electoral setbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Feasible Socialism
    ENDORSEMENT n. the occarion of the first nmtingr of the gov­ at the time of the April 2000 meetings of the erning bodier of the International Monetary World Bank and the International Moneta11 Fund 0 Fund (IMF) and the World Bank in the 21 rt (IMF) 10 Washington, DC. DSA/YDS will par­ century, we callfor the immediate stupension of the poli­ ticipate in the Mobilizatton for Global Jusucc, a cies and practices that have ca1md widerpread pover!J week of educational events and nonviolent p:o­ and mfftring among the worlds peoples, and damage to tests in Washington, which aim to promote m ·c the global environment. IJ:7e hold these inrlit11tionr respon­ equitable and democratically operated glom rible, along with the IVorldTrade Organization (WfO), stitutions in this time of sharp incguahty. I..ar~ for an unjurt global economic rystem. transnational corporations have gotten together: We issue this call in the name of global jus­ It's time for the rest of us. DSA believes Uu" tice, in solidarity with the peoples of the Global this is the appropriate follow-up to the protes o: South struggling for survival and dignity in the that derailed the \VfO meetings in Seattle face of unjust economic policies. Only when the fall. coercive powers of international financial insti­ DSA 1s joined in this mobilizanon b m tutions are rescinded shall governments be ac­ other organizations, such as Jubilee 2 • r countable first and foremost to the will of their Years is Enough, Global Exchange., and Pu people for equitable economJc development. Citizens's Global Trade Watch.
    [Show full text]