DOCSLIB.ORG

Acrp Project 07–07 Evaluating Terminal Renewal Versus Replacement Options

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ACRP PROJECT 07–07 EVALUATING TERMINAL RENEWAL VERSUS REPLACEMENT OPTIONS DRAFT FINAL REPORT Prepared for Airport Cooperative Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT The report, not released for publication, is furnished only for review to members of or participants in the work of the CRP. This report is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the CRP. Ricondo & Associates, Inc. Chicago, Illinois Faith Group, LLC. St. Louis, Missouri Kohnen - Starkey, Inc. Marshall, Virginia January 2012 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration and was conducted in the Airports Cooperative Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. DISCLAIMER This is an uncorrected draft as submitted by the research agency. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research agency. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Academies, or the program sponsors. ii ACRP PROJECT 07–07 EVALUATING TERMINAL RENEWAL VERSUS REPLACEMENT OPTIONS DRAFT FINAL REPORT Prepared for Airport Cooperative Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT The report, not released for publication, is furnished only for review to members of or participants in the work of the CRP. This report is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the CRP. Ricondo & Associates, Inc. Chicago, Illinois Faith Group, LLC. St. Louis, Missouri Kohnen-Starkey, Inc. Marshall, Virginia January 2012 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE ..................................................................................... 1 KEY RESEARCH FINDINGS ..................................................................................................... 1 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 1 PRODUCTS ................................................................................................................................... 2 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................ 2 CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................... 3 PROBLEM LEADING TO THE STUDY ................................................................................... 3 DATA SOURCES .......................................................................................................................... 3 Literature Review ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Airport Operator Interviews ........................................................................................................................ 4 CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON TERMINAL REDEVELOPMENT DECISIONS ............... 4 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE RESEARCH PROJECT.............................................. 5 DEVELOPMENT OF THE GUIDEBOOK ................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER 2 RESEARCH APPROACH....................................................................... 6 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................. 6 CASE STUDIES ............................................................................................................................. 7 DEVELOPMENT OF THE GUIDEBOOK ................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 3 FINDINGS AND APPLICATIONS ........................................................... 8 STEP 1: Determine Need For Terminal Redevelopment ........................................................... 8 STEP 2: REFINE TERMINAL REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND GENERATE OPTIONS .................................................................................................... 10 STEP 3: EVALUATE OPTIONS ............................................................................................... 12 STEP 4: Document Results From the Analyses ........................................................................ 14 CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 16 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................... 16 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................. 17 Plan for Implementing the Research Products .......................................................................................... 18 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 18 APPENDIX A ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................. 1 APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF CASE STUDY INTERVIEWS ........................................ 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Step 1 Process Diagram ...................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2 Step 2 Process Diagram .................................................................................................... 11 Figure 3 Step 3 Process Diagram .................................................................................................... 13 Figure 4 Step 4 Process Diagram .................................................................................................... 15 iv ACRP PROJECT 07-07 PANEL Ms. Angela R. Newland, Broward County (FL) Aviation Department, Ft. Lauderdale, FL (Chair) Mr. Roddy L. Boggus, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Dallas, TX Mr. Kenneth A. Bower, American Airlines, Fort Worth, TX Mr. Jon A. Cimperman, Port of Oakland, Oakland, CA Mr. Kiran Merchant, Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, Chatham, NJ Mr. Gregory Wellman, HNTB Corporation, Chicago, IL Dr. Elisha Novak, FAA Liaison Mr. Matthew J. Griffin, Airports Council International, Other Liaison Ms. Christine Gerencher, TRB Liaison AUTHOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under ACRP 07-07 by the Ricondo & Associates, Inc. Team. Ricondo & Associates, Inc. served as the prime contractor, and the team includes two subcontractors, Faith Group, LLC and Kohnen-Starkey Inc. Mr. Joe Chang, Vice President of Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (Alexandria, Virginia), served as the Principal Investigator. The other authors and those providing research and technical support are Mr. Jeff Schulthess, Vice President at Ricondo & Associates, Inc.; Mr. Thomas H. Brown, Associate Vice President at Ricondo & Associates, Inc.; Mr. Taras M. Sanow, Managing Consultant at Ricondo & Associates, Inc., Mr. Matt W. Ruffra, Senior Consultant at Ricondo & Associates, Inc.; Mr. Tom Simanivanh, Senior Consultant at Ricondo & Associates, Inc.; Ms. Pilar Moffitt, Technical Specialist at Ricondo & Associates, Inc.; Ms. Faith Varwig, Principal at Faith Group, LLC; Mr. Hunter S. Fulghum, Senior Security and Technology Consultant at Faith Group, LLC; Mr. Mark Starkey, Vice President at Kohnen-Starkey, Inc.; and Mr. Bruce Lyall, Lead Cost Consultant at Kohnen-Starkey, Inc. The work was conducted under the general direction of Mr. Chang. The research team would like to express its gratitude to the members of the ACRP Project Panel for their input throughout the research project and Ms. Theresia H. Schatz, the ACRP Senior Program Officer and Mr. Joseph J. Brown-Snell, the ACRP Program Associate, for their guidance. The research team would also like to thank staff members of those airports that participated in this research: Asheville Regional Airport, Dallas Love Field, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport, Indianapolis International Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, McClellan-Palomar Airport, Phoenix Sky-Harbor International Airport, and Wichita-Mid Continent Airport. v ABSTRACT This research, conducted under Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Project 07- 07, Evaluating Terminal Renewal versus Replacement Options, supports the development of a Guidebook to provide airport professionals, policymakers, and industry professionals with a step-by- step process for conducting a business-driven evaluation of competing options to renew or replace airport terminal facilities. The process is repeatable and scalable to airports of different sizes. Furthermore, the Guidebook is intended to assist the user in identifying the need for terminal redevelopment and selecting among competing options for renewing versus replacing existing terminal facilities. The Guidebook promotes a sequential four-step process wherein the need for terminal redevelopment is determined; options are developed; evaluations are performed; and recommendations are documented. vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE Airport operators are challenged to develop alternatives to evaluating strictly cost-driven approaches for renewing
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz

    Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz

    THE OFFICE OF THE QUEENS BOROUGH PRESIDENT Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz Queens Borough President The Borough of Queens is home to more than 2.3 million residents, representing more than 120 countries and speaking more than 135 languages1. The seamless knit that ties these distinct cultures and transforms them into shared communities is what defines the character of Queens. The Borough’s diverse population continues to steadily grow. Foreign-born residents now represent 48% of the Borough’s population2. Traditional immigrant gateways like Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Corona, and Flushing are now communities with the highest foreign-born population in the entire city3. Immigrant and Intercultural Services The immigrant population remains largely underserved. This is primarily due to linguistic and cultural barriers. Residents with limited English proficiency now represent 28% of the Borough4, indicating a need for a wide range of social service support and language access to City services. All services should be available in multiple languages, and outreach should be improved so that culturally sensitive programming can be made available. The Borough President is actively working with the Queens General Assembly, a working group organized by the Office of the Queens Borough President, to address many of these issues. Cultural Queens is amidst a cultural transformation. The Borough is home to some of the most iconic buildings and structures in the world, including the globally recognized Unisphere and New York State Pavilion. Areas like Astoria and Long Island City are establishing themselves as major cultural hubs. In early 2014, the New York City Council designated the area surrounding Kaufman Astoria Studios as the city’s first arts district through a City Council Proclamation The areas unique mix of adaptively reused residential, commercial, and manufacturing buildings serve as a catalyst for growth in culture and the arts.
  • Wild Bulls, Discarded Foreigners, and Brash Champions: US Empire and the Cultural Constructions of Argentine Boxers Daniel Fridman & David Sheinin

    Wild Bulls, Discarded Foreigners, and Brash Champions: US Empire and the Cultural Constructions of Argentine Boxers Daniel Fridman & David Sheinin

    Wild Bulls, Discarded Foreigners, and Brash Champions: US Empire and the Cultural Constructions of Argentine Boxers Daniel Fridman & David Sheinin In the past decade, scholars have devoted growing attention to American cultural influences and impact in the Philippines, Panama, and other societies where the United States exerted violent imperial influences.1 In countries where US imperi- alism was less devastating to local political cultures, the nature of American cultur- al influence and the impact such force had is less clear and less well documented.2 Argentina is one such example. American political and cultural influences in twen- tieth-century Argentina cannot be equated with the cases of Mexico or the Dominican Republic, nor can they be said to have had as profound an impact on national cultures. At the same time, after 1900, US cultural influences were perva- sive in and had a lasting impact on Argentina. There is, to be sure, a danger of trivializing the force of American Empire by confusing Argentines with Filipinos as subject peoples. Argentina is not a “classic” case of US imperialism in Latin America. While the United States supported the 1976 coup d’état in Argentina, for example, there is no evidence of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and US military backing on a scale equivalent to the 1964 military coup in Brazil or the 1973 overthrow of democracy in Chile. Although American weapons and military strategies were employed by the Argentine armed forces in state terror operations after 1960, there was no Argentine equivalent
  • Heirport Eero Saarinen's Twa Terminal Has a New Neighbor That Embodies

    Heirport Eero Saarinen's Twa Terminal Has a New Neighbor That Embodies

    136 I.D. November⁄December 2008 www.id-mag.com … crit…environment 137 tapas bars. Before jetBlue, no one had attempted a white-tablecloth restaurant at JFK since the reviewed by greg lindsay raymond loewy–designed coffee shop in saarin- en’s terminal. But as airport “dwell times” have soared since 9/11, sit-down meals have become Heirport viable again. rockwell’s personal contributions are a chan- delier of flat-screens floating above a grandstand eero saarinen’s TWA terminal has where idling departing passengers will be able to watch the eternal stream of new arrivals. rockwell went all the way back to william whyte’s pioneer- a new neighbor that embodies the ing studies of human traffic in public spaces to create the layout and placement of his grandstand, realities of 21st-century air travel. which doubles as a traffic funnel. once past the marketplace, the terminal is more prosaic—artfully, purposefully so. “everything is done with an eye toward usefulness,” hooper told me, like the special slurry of scuff-camouflaging terrazzo in the halls, or the virtually indestructible blue carpeting that just might outlast the terminal. the only razzle-dazzle is provided by workstations at each gate from which passengers will be able to order food for delivery—an eye-opening innovation with the potential to be a customer-service disaster at peak hours. But the most crucial feature of all, at least from the airline’s perspective, is one that will likely go unnoticed by most passengers. small closets stocked with cleaning supplies have been placed at each gate; the faster jetBlue can wipe down its JetBlue’s new JFK terminal planes, the faster it can reload and get them back in tries not to overshadow the air, saving money lost to delays and increasing the Eero Saarinen landmark out front.
  • The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Freedom of Information (FOI) Request Log, 2000-2012

    The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Freedom of Information (FOI) Request Log, 2000-2012

    Description of document: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Freedom of Information (FOI) Request Log, 2000-2012 Requested date: 08-August-2011 Released date: 07-February-2012 Posted date: 20-February-2012 Title of document Freedom of Information Requests Date/date range of document: 23-April-2000 – 05-January-2012 Source of document: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey FOI Administrator Office of the Secretary 225 Park Avenue South, 17th Floor New York, NY 10003 Fax: (212) 435-7555 Online Electronic FOIA Request Form The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
  • The :TWA: Hotel's Lockheed Constellation

    The :TWA: Hotel's Lockheed Constellation

    The :TWA: Hotel’s Lockheed Constellation THE “CONNIE” FLIES THROUGH NYC John F. Kennedy International Airport New York City NYC’s Aviation Triumph The magic of the Jet Age returns to John F. Kennedy International Airport with a 19581956 Lockheed ✈ Constellation L-1649A Starliner (the “Connie”) positioned on the TWA Hotel’s tarmac outside the landmark 1962 TWA Flight Center. Known as the secret weapons of TWA’s former owner, Howard Hughes, the airline’s fleet of cutting-edge Constellation planes broke the era’s transcontinental speed record. The aircraft will make history again as the first Connie transformed into a cocktail lounge. 2 Project Overview The TWA Hotel (currently under development by MCR and MORSE Development) will feature a one-of-a-kind cocktail lounge inside the fuselage of a fully restored Lockheed Constellation L-1649A Starliner (the “Connie”). ✈ The exterior of the plane is fully restored, complete with authentic 1962 TWA livery, engines and propellers. ✈ The interior fuselage of the plane will be refurbished and designed as a high-end lounge with 30 to 40 seats. ✈ The Connie will sit on the TWA Hotel’s “tarmac” located just outside the lobby. 3 Project Overview ✈ MCR and MORSE Development purchased the ✈ In October 2018, the Connie will journey from Maine aircraft from Lufthansa in early 2018. through the heart of Manhattan and finally to the TWA • The plane is one of four remaining Lockheed Constellation Hotel at JFK Airport. L-1649As in the entire world (only 44 total were made). • The plane will travel down I-95 through the Bronx and into Manhattan.
  • Tower Air Terminal Jfk

    Tower Air Terminal Jfk

    Tower Air Terminal Jfk Past Anton indagated: he rearoused his aphylly stutteringly and flip-flop. Fattier Tracie degenerate or degusts some greaser sparsedisconsolately, Michal outtelling however orunovercome reintegrate. Herbert outstared word-for-word or reconnoitre. Leland foretastes irrepealably if This week in any insurance company control and jfk terminal operators in accordance with american was recently named after being demolished but no third party hereto must be amended only Would you like to see your business listed on this page? Wolfgang Puck Express, for a sandwich. During that period, planes became bigger, faster, and cheaper to manufacture thanks to the growing popularity of the jet engine. Continue being unregistered user. Medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine and Director of the Bernbaum Unit, Center for Special Studies at New York Presbyterian Hospital. Passiak said as she walked through the hangar on a recent morning. Matters which cannot be resolved in an expedient manner by the Operations Advisory Committee and which are materially important to the use and operation of the Delta Premises shall be brought to the attention of the Management Committee for expedited resolution. The following markings were spotted at the Pan Am Worldport, which is sadly being demolished right now. His family had immigrated to Israel shortly after it became independent. Dare I say that the service was better. This second longest runway in the US is used by NASA as a backup space shuttle landing spot. They arrived without any clothes, expecting to take a flight back to Israel later in the day, Goldshmid said. UK announces quarantine for travelers from Spain.
  • PHX Sky Train Stage 2 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport

    PHX Sky Train Stage 2 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport

    PROJECT PHX Sky Train Stage 2 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport by Andrew Mish, Modjeski and Masters Inc. The Phoenix Sky Harbor International of this program is the Stage 2 project scheduled in 2022, the extension Airport (PHX) is poised to see a to build a 2.2-mile extension of the will allow the automated train to significant increase in the number Phoenix Sky Train from Terminal 3 to run from the Rental Car Center east of travelers using the facility in the the Rental Car Center. This extension through the airport, with stops at all coming years. According to the City will provide a direct link for passengers existing passenger terminals and a new of Phoenix Aviation Department, 2019 between the airport and the Rental Car passenger drop-off/pickup station, was a record year for PHX, with just Center. The trains will depart every 3 to before terminating at the 44th Street shy of 46.3 million passengers traveling 5 minutes with a travel time of 8 minutes Station, which connects to the Valley through the airport. This was a 5% to and from the terminals, providing a Metro Rail serving Phoenix and other increase over the nearly 44 million significant improvement to the current local communities. passengers using the PHX facility just shuttle bus system, which can require up two years prior, in 2017. to 30 minutes of wait and travel time. Stage 2 Extension Bridges Stage 2 of the Phoenix Sky Train To handle the increasing volume of Construction is ongoing; however, provides two guideways for automated PHX travelers, the City of Phoenix has precast concrete element delivery is trains.
  • Views and Intimate Interior Details That Recognize Wright’S Keen Observation of the Landscape and Incorporate the Natural Environment Into Wright’S Spaces

    Views and Intimate Interior Details That Recognize Wright’S Keen Observation of the Landscape and Incorporate the Natural Environment Into Wright’S Spaces

    CONTENTS Dear Friends and Colleagues, Welcome 3 The Western Museums Association (WMA) in partnership with the Museum Association Acknowledgments 4 of Arizona cordially invites you to the 2016 Annual Meeting in Phoenix, Arizona on Special Thanks 5 September 25-28, 2016. Schedule At-A-Glance 7 Named after a mythological and cyclically reborn bird, Phoenix is one of the most populous and fastest-growing cities in the nation. With CHANGE as the theme, the Annual Key Information 8 Meeting will focus on the shifting museum landscape and how the field can adapt to rise Program Key 9 anew. Together as a museum professional community, we will ask: How can museums stay relevant in a rapidly changing technological and social environment? What happens to staff Sunday, September 25 11 when there is a change in leadership or ideology at a museum? How does change help Monday, September 26 14 museums have meaningful conversations about the future of the field? What better place than Phoenix, a rapidly expanding city founded on the idea of renewal, to discuss change? Tuesday, September 27 21 In keeping with the theme of CHANGE, we are changing up our program this year. The Wednesday, September 28 SESSIONS 28 2016 Annual Meeting will feature an open exhibit hall, branching off into session rooms, Exhibitors 33 providing a central meeting space for all WMA attendees. The program includes two distinguished keynote speakers: The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa, the first woman of Area Information 35 Native American descent to serve as a United States District Judge and Gregory Hinton, the creator and producer of Out West™, a historic national program series dedicated to About 36 illuminating the history and culture of the Lesbian, Gay Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) communities in the American West.
  • JFK's TWA Hotel Is Open for Business

    JFK's TWA Hotel Is Open for Business

    www.MetroAirportNews.com Serving the Airport Workforce and Local Communities June 2019 INSIDE THIS ISSUE JFK’s TWA Hotel Is Open for Business At last, the long-awaited opening of the TWA Hotel has happened. On May 15th, the TWA Hotel opened its doors to the public and a long- line of media people and invited guests. The neo-futurist hotel is the only on-airport prop- erty hotel at JFK. 06 The hotel’s designers saved that architec- tural gem, the Eero Saarinen designed TWA JFK Chamber Hosts Flight Center, and made it an integral part of First Event at Newly the facility. The Flight Center will serve as its Opened TWA Hotel reception area and lobby. The Flight Center, which was also known as the Trans World Flight Center welcomed pas- sengers starting in 1962. Both the exterior and interior of the building were declared land- marks by the New York City Landmarks Pres- ervation Commission in 1994. The design features a prominent wing- shaped thin shell roof over the main terminal focusing on Eero Saarinen’s original design as “Our proposal was to shave off the old and tube-shaped, red-carpeted departure-ar- a sculpture, and looking at how the world had pieces of the building and take it back to its 11 rival corridors. Its tall windows – unusual for moved on around it, with elevated roadways 1962 original, the way that Saarinen had envi- the time period – offered travelers expansive and new terminals surrounding the space. The sioned it, so we get that beautiful form again,” JFK Airport’s Terminal 4 views of airport operations.
  • John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) Reconfiguration of Taxiways F and H Environmental Determination

    John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) Reconfiguration of Taxiways F and H Environmental Determination

    New York Airports District Office U. S. Department 159-30 Rockaway Blvd, Suite 111 of Transportation Jamaica, NY 11434 Federal Aviation Administration February 13, 2017 Mr. Tom Bock General Manager Regulatory and Operational Support The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Four World Trade Center 150 Greenwich Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10006 Re: John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) Reconfiguration of Taxiways F and H Environmental Determination Dear Mr. Bock: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has recently approved the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (EA/FONSI) for the Reconfiguration of Taxiways F and H at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK). A copy of the FONSI signed by the Approving Official and the EA signature page signed by the Responsible FAA Official are attached. This Federal environmental approval is a determination by the Approving Official that the requirements imposed by applicable environmental statutes and regulations have been satisfied by a FONSI. However, it is not an approval of any other Federal action relative to the project proposal. In compliance with Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations 1501.4(e)(1) and 1506.6, we require that your office make the final EA with Signature Page and FONSI available to the affected public, and announce such availability through appropriate media in the area. The announcement shall indicate the availability of the document for examination and note the appropriate location of general public access where the document may be found (i.e., your office, local libraries, public buildings, etc.). We request that a copy of such announcement be sent to us when it is issued.
  • Us Airports on the Runway

    Us Airports on the Runway

    US AIRPORTS GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE US AIRPORTS ON THE RUNWAY IN MUCH OF THE WORLD, PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3S) HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY USED TO DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN (DBFOM) AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. IN CONTRAST, FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS THE P3 MODEL HAS TRADITIONALLY BEEN UNDER-UTILISED AT US AIRPORTS. HOWEVER, THIS IS STARTING TO CHANGE. THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES THE REASONS FOR THE SLOW ADOPTION IN THE US, BEFORE DISCUSSING NEW AIRPORT P3 PROJECTS THAT ARE UNDER WAY AND OTHERS THAT ARE COMING TO THE MARKET. BY RODERICK DEVLIN, VIRGINIA WONG AND KENNETH LIND, NIXON PEABODY LLP. There are two primary reasons why the US This US$20bn annual requirement is much has been slow to embrace the P3 model in the greater than the funding traditionally available airport sector; availability of multiple sources of through additional tax-exempt funding, AIP capital funding and restriction on use of airport- grants, PFC revenue, state grants and airport- generated revenues. generated income. P3s offer a potential way to Public owners of US airports have access to help fill this shortfall. a ready source of cost-effective debt financing for capital projects, in the form of tax-exempt The Trump Infrastructure Plan bond financing. In addition, the federal Airport The Trump administration’s long-awaited Improvement Program (AIP) provides grants to infrastructure plan was released in February airports for the planning and development of 2018, entitled “A Legislative Outline for public-use airport assets. Rebuilding Infrastructure in America”. The Trump Airport owners are also permitted to collect Plan, which sets forth the White House’s proposal passenger facility charges (PFCs) for each for legislative action, is broadly supportive of boarding passenger and use the resulting revenue P3s and includes various provisions that could for capital projects, subject to approval by the US specifically boost P3s in the airport sector, such Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation as: Administration (FAA).
  • Open House Held for New A.J. Rick Off School

    Open House Held for New A.J. Rick Off School

    ••••••••••••••••• For Cleveland's Future • Kid's Corner Vote For •••••••••••••••••Nia Const&DCe Glin, who is Frank Jackson 5even weeks old, was born 011 Seplember 2. 200! at 3:!55 un. IIlii sbe weigbed Ia On Tuesday, November 8 at 6 pounds and 7 ounces and she was 18.75 inches long. Nia's pueats are ''I love this city and I will de­ C.D., Jr. IDd Jacqueline. Nia's pandpar'­ mand that we be a city that is ents ate C.O., Sr. aod E'YCrlene GilD. Nia's second to none." favorite food is ber boUle. ......._"""w::~-..11 VOL. 26 No. 29 Thesday, October 18, 2005-Friday, October 21,2005 Daily ASTSID ISSUED FRIDAY FREE SERVING: LARCHMERE-WOODLAND,SHAKERSQUARE,BUCKEYE, WOODLAND,MT. PLEASANT, LEE&AVALON,HARVARD-LEE,MILES-UNION,UNIVERSITYCIRCLEAREA, READ ON - WRITE ON WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, VilLAGES OFNORTHRANDALL, IDGHLAND HILLSANDCITYOFEASTCLEVELAND READ ON-WRITE ON I "COVERING THE NEWS TODAYFORABETI'ER 'IOMORROW" Frank Jackson gets city wide support to be mayor BYGEDRGEGOLDMAN Based on his solid prin­ ciples, character and integrity, Cuyahoga County Auditor Frank Russo recently gave Frank Jack­ son a hearty and rousing endorse­ ment for him to be the next mayor for the city of Cleveland. Russo endorsed Jackson at his campaign headquarters and he brought a throng of supporters with him to pledge their support to Jackson and to campaign for Jack­ son throughout the city to ensure him to be elected mayor on Tues­ day, November 8. Robert J. Triozzi, who was a mayoral candidate and a former Municipal Court judge, also en­ dorsed Jackson for mayor.