DOCSLIB.ORG

Aztec Deities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aztec Deities A ztec Z T E C Deities E I T I E S Introduction to Aztec Deities In 2000, I began a series entitled themselves at Tenochitlán (Mexico Aztec Deities. I chose eleven Aztec City); the emperor Montezuma gods' names for the series. welcomed him. This foolish move Interestingly, there was a god for by Montezuma allowed Cortéz to almost every purpose and aspect of make his headquarters in the life in the Aztec culture. I chose capitol. Later, he was informed that some of their most important gods other Aztecs had plundered and goddesses; others were a purely Veracruz and killed the contingent arbitrary choice on my part. I did of men he left there. He seized this series because I wanted to relate Montezuma and forced his as a 'gringo' and as contemporary surrender of his warriors; he then visual artist, on the subject of these executed the emperor. fascinating and important Aztec deities. Cortés and men were astonished at the incredibly advanced city-state of Tenochtitlán, which had been Extremely bloody religious rituals built on a large lake with irrigation. and internecine warfare dominated With a population of over 200,000 the Aztec empire (1427-1521) and people, larger than any European helped to finally result in its demise. city at that time, Tenochtitlán's At its apex it stretched across most markets brimmed with produce. of central Mesoamerica. Gold, silver and precious stones were displayed in abundance. The infamously indomitable Cortés realized that the Spanish Spanish conquistador Hernando crown would reward him for Cortés conquered it with a very finding gold and that he would small army after his landing on the become personally wealthy. He east coast around Veracruz in April sought rebellious nearby native 1519. There, to prevent all thought tribes to join him in his warfare of retreat, he burned his own ships. against the Aztecs. With only about Leaving a small force on the coast, 1,000 troops, horses, crude Cortés led the rest of his men into weaponry, and typical armor, with the interior. A warlike tribe of great military acumen Cortés natives attacked his party. He forged conquered the vast Aztec land and forward, after the battle with the extended empire. Their civilization local natives, and on November 8, was devastated. 1519, Cortés and his army found What I have outlined here is the popular version - 7 - of the 'conquest' of the Aztecs. Professor Andrés win the most powerful to his side. Reséndez in his history “A Land So Strange” Cortés left 200 of his men at delves even deeper. Tenochtitlán and marched to In Rséndez's book he brings into Campollon [near Vera Cruz]. Cortés focus the roles played by Diego defeated Narávez, “shackled him in Velázquez and Pánfilo de Narváez. chains” and jailed him in Vera Cruz; Velázquez was “the richest resident he got his men to agree to join him in of Espanola, the island shared today his thirst for riches and power and to by Haiti and the Dominican fight the Aztecs. * With significant Republic.”* With his connections in help (thousands joined Cortés) from Spain he got the crown to authorize other tribes, who hated the Aztecs, him to occupy Cuba. Narávez joined Cortés went on to 'conquer' the him in this 'power play' and was Aztec empire. dispatched to the court to influence the crown in Velázquez interest in * See A Land So Strange by Andrés the New World. Several years Reseéndez; published by Basic elapsed; finally after the death of Books, copyright 2007 by Andrés King Ferdinand and the assumption Reséndez; chapter 1 “The Prize That of the crown by Charles of Ghent, he was able to get approval from the Was Snatched Away.” King, due mostly because of Velázquez discoveries of gold in the Yucatan in 1517-18. * Cortés agenda was not in sync with Velázquez and Narávez. He saw opportunity for himself and got an expedition together to seek the riches found in the Yucatan. Both parties sought intrigue and counter-intrigue seeking dominance one over the other. Narávez assembled (with Velázquez backing) troops and moved on Cortés claim on Mexico. He landed around Vera Cruz. Cortés saw Little Feast of the Dead © Roland Salazar Rose 2000 Narávez forces in Mexico as a threat as Montezuma was plying both In 2000 with eleven Aztec gods' and parties with gifts and attempting to goddesses' names on hand, I set out - 8 - to create eleven contemporary media. When I employed a brush, it images of them. The glyphs of the was not always used as in painting or gods that are shown in the codices, for lines, but rather used as broad or Aztec books, helped in my marks or for filling in the chapapote process of representation. But background color. In the 2000 series mostly the images just sprang up as I the work is oil pastels with chapapote drew them. The paper images, about in my medium Sal-Zar. In 2002 I 9 X 12 inches, (vertical) were later used chapapote, spray enamels and mounted to wood, done in mixed oil pastels. I know that there is media. All of these images are now in private collections in England, controversy concerning the use of Mexico and the U.S.A. spray paint; however I leave it to conservators to determine this. Two years later I revisited the idea of representing the gods and I created Why did I do the Aztec Deities another series of the same number Series when obviously I could never and names. This time I decided to do present a true appreciation of the more than just show a head image majesty of this time in history? I and would instead represent entire didn't research the mythology on the figures. I also decided on an God Tonatiuh, which translates as introductory piece for the eleven “He Who Makes the Day” and use gods and goddesses, as each year I this as a basis for the painting. I let do a piece that I title “Roland's my imagination take hold and this friend”; I painted a corresponding guided me to represent the gods. piece for this series of eleven, bringing the total to twelve. I used Clearly this work represents a the same names for the gods as in the series of 2000: He Who Makes the “gringo” contemporary artist's Day: Tonatiuh; Our Flayed Lord: Xipel understanding and view of a period Totec; Obsidian Butterfly: Itzpapalot; in history when gods & goddesses Two Rabbit: Ome Tochtli; Lord of the abounded and when a vast military Nose: Yacatecuhtli; Salt Woman: and civil society was destroyed for Huixtocihuatl; Smoking Mirror: 'conquest: for gold' and in the name Tezatlepoca; Little Feast of the Dead: of church and state. Miccailhuitontli; Defied Woman: Cihuateteo; Yellow Face: Xiuhtecuhtli- As for me, I did not seek out the Ixcozauhqui; Cloud Serpent: Mixcocatl. gods and goddess; they came to me! As to the techniques employed in these two bodies of work, they are San Miguel de Allende, México 2008 best described as drawings in mixed - 9 - He Who Makes the Lord of the Nose Day Tonatiuh Our Flayed Lord Obsidian Butterfly Two Rabbit Yacatecuhtli Xipe Totec Itzpapalotl Ome Tochtli Salt Woman Smoking Mirrw Little Feast of the Dead Yellow Face Huixtocihuatl ezcatliepoca Deified Woman Miccailhultontli Cihuateto Xiuhtecuhtli Ixcozauhqui Cloud Serpent Mixcoatl Perhaps the Aztec influence Puts a Mask On the Mexican psyche? What other reason for both The black and white presence In each encounter? An upward glance And a downward stare ¡ - 10 - “ He Who Makes the Day: Tonatiuh ” “Tonatiuh was also known as the fifth sun, because the Aztecs believed that he was the sun that took over when the fourth sun was expelled from the sky. The Aztecs were fascinated by the sun and carefully observed it, and had a solar calendar second only in accuracy to the Mayans. According to the Aztec creation myth, the god demanded human sacrifice as tribute and without it would refuse to move through the sky. It is said that 20,000 people were sacrificed each year to Tonatiuh and other gods, though this number is thought to be inflated either by the Aztecs, who wanted to inspire fear in their enemies, or the Spaniards, who wanted to vilify the Aztecs.”1 - 11 - “ Our Flayed Lord: Xipe Totec ” “Aztec mythology, Xipe Totec ("our lord the flayed one") was a life-death- rebirth deity, god of agriculture, the west, disease, spring, goldsmiths and the seasons. He flayed himself to give food to humanity, symbolic of the maize seed losing the outer layer of the seed before germination and of snakes shedding their skin. Without his skin, he was depicted as a golden god. Annually, slaves were selected as sacrifices to Xipe Totec. These slaves were carefully flayed to produce a nearly whole skin which was then worn by the priests during the fertility rituals that followed the sacrifice.. Paintings and several clay figures have been found which illustrate the flaying method and the appearance of priests wearing flayed skins.”2 - 12 - “Obsidian Butterfly: Itzpapalotl” “In Aztec mythology, Itzpapalotl ("Clawed Butterfly" or "Obsidian Butterfly") was a fearsome skeletal warrior goddess, who ruled over the paradise world of Tamoanchan, the paradise of victims of infant mortality and place identified where humans were created.[ She is the mother of Mixcoatl and is particularly associated with the moth Rothschildia orizaba from the family Saturniidae. Some of her associations include birds and fire. Her nahualli was a deer.”3 - 13 -.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2. Water and Fire: Archaeology in the Capital of the Mexica Empire
    2. Water and Fire: Archaeology in the Capital of the Mexica Empire Leonardo Lopez Luján The archaeology of México- Tenochtitlan Tenochtitlan made up for the lack of archae- As recently as two decades ago, systematized ological exploration on a large scale. For example, information on Mexico-Tenochtitlan, the the graphic and written information on the metropolis of the most important Mesoamerican Templo Mayor (Great Temple) of Tenochtitlan state at the time of the Europeans' arrival, was was enough to reveal the history of the most extremely scarce. Unlike other cities such as Tikal, important religious building of the empire from its Monte Albán and Teotihuacan, the capital of the founding, through its multiple extensions and Mexica (Aztec) empire was never the site of right up to the time when it was completely extensive excavation projects that were to bring its dismantled. In fact, no other monument in Ancient principal remains to light. The explanation for this Mexico so commanded the attention of both archaeological ignorance is very simple. In 1521, natives and outsiders alike or was the subject of the island occupied by the twin cities of Mexico- such lengthy descriptions as this double temple Tenochtitlan and Mexico-Tlatelolco fell into the dedicated to Huitzilopochtli (the God of Sun and hands of the Spanish conquerors (fig. 8). After the War) and Tláloc (the Rain God). All kinds of victory, Hernán Cortés took the historie decision information relating to the Great Temple can be to destroy the metropolis which had been home to found in the indigenous pictographic documents between 200,000 and 300,000 inhabitants and and Náhuatl language texts; in the accounts of the covered an area of 13.5 square kilometres (Rojas European conquerors who saw it functioning and 1992: 31-5, 57-84).
    [Show full text]
  • Aztec Mythology
    Aztec Mythology One of the main things that must be appreciated about Aztec mythology is that it has both similarities and differences to European polytheistic religions. The idea of what a god was, and how they acted, was not the same between the two cultures. Along with all other native American religions, the Aztec faith developed from the Shamanism brought by the first migrants over the Bering Strait, and developed independently of influences from across the Atlantic (and Pacific). The concept of dualism is one that students of Chinese religions should be aware of; the idea of balance was primary in this belief system. Gods were not entirely good or entirely bad, being complex characters with many different aspects and their own desires and motivations. This is highlighted by the relation between Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca. When the Spanish arrived with their European sensibilities, they were quick to name one good and one evil, identifying Quetzalcoatl with Christ and Tezcatlipoca with Satan during their attempts to integrate the Nahua peoples into Christianity. But to the Aztecs neither god would have been “better” than the other; they are just different and opposing sides of the same duality. Indeed, their identities are rather nebulous, with Quetzalcoatl often being referred to as “White Tezcatlipoca” and Tezcatlipoca as “Black Quetzalcoatl”. The Mexica, as is explained in the history section, came from North of Mexico in a location they named “Aztlan” (from which Europeans developed the term Aztec). During their migration south they were exposed to and assimilated elements of several native religions, including those of the Toltecs, Mayans, and Zapotecs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchy in the Representation of Death in Pre- and Post-Conquest Aztec Codices
    1 Multilingual Discourses Vol. 1.2 Spring 2014 Tanya Ball The Power of Death: Hierarchy in the Representation of Death in Pre- and Post-Conquest Aztec Codices hrough an examination of Aztec death iconography in pre- and post-Conquest codices of the central valley of Mexico T (Borgia, Mendoza, Florentine, and Telleriano-Remensis), this paper will explore how attitudes towards the Aztec afterlife were linked to questions of hierarchical structure, ritual performance and the preservation of Aztec cosmovision. Particular attention will be paid to the representation of mummy bundles, sacrificial debt- payment and god-impersonator (ixiptla) sacrificial rituals. The scholarship of Alfredo López-Austin on Aztec world preservation through sacrifice will serve as a framework in this analysis of Aztec iconography on death. The transformation of pre-Hispanic traditions of representing death will be traced from these pre- to post-Conquest Mexican codices, in light of processes of guided syncretism as defined by Hugo G. Nutini and Diana Taylor’s work on the performative role that codices play in re-activating the past. These practices will help to reflect on the creation of the modern-day Mexican holiday of Día de los Muertos. Introduction An exploration of the representation of death in Mexica (popularly known as Aztec) pre- and post-Conquest Central Mexican codices is fascinating because it may reveal to us the persistence and transformation of Aztec attitudes towards death and the after-life, which in some cases still persist today in the Mexican holiday Día de Tanya Ball 2 los Muertos, or Day of the Dead. This tradition, which hails back to pre-Columbian times, occurs every November 1st and 2nd to coincide with All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ day in the Christian calendar, and honours the spirits of the deceased.
    [Show full text]
  • Ce Acatl Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl and His Position in the Succession of Toltec Rulers: an Interpretation Through Colhua History
    Ce Acatl Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl y su lugar en la sucesión de gobernantes toltecas. Una interpretación a través de la historia colhua Ce Acatl Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl and his Position in the Succession of Toltec Rulers: An Interpretation through Colhua History ERIK DAMIÁN Doctor en historia por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma REYES MORALES de México. Profesor de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales en la misma universidad. Su principal línea de investigación es el pensamiento geopolítico en la nobleza prehispánica. Su última publicación, escrita en coautoría con José Rubén Romero Galván, es “Aztlan, Teocolhuacan, el inicio de una migración y el fin de una triple alianza. Tiempos y lugares” (Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl, 2019). [email protected] RESUMEN Una de las principales discusiones sobre el papel de Ce Acatl Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl en la historia de Mesoamérica se ha centrado en el lugar que éste ocupó en la sucesión de gobernantes de Tula. Paul Kirchhoff y Wigberto Jiménez Moreno iniciaron esta discusión. A partir de entonces, algunos autores sostienen que Ce Acatl fue uno de los primeros tlahtoque de los toltecas; otros, que fue contemporáneo de Huemac y testigo de la caída de Tula. Este artículo ofrece un análisis de la historia de Ce Acatl desde la tradición colhua, a través de la cual es posible establecer que este gobernante se ubicó en la mitad de la línea de sucesión. Además, en el texto se abordan temas como los vínculos familiares de Ce Acatl, el contexto en el que se estableció la primera excan tlahtoloyan y las características del sistema de gobierno entre los toltecas.
    [Show full text]
  • Toltec.Html Toltec
    Text and pictures adapted from http://www.crystalinks.com/toltec.html Toltec The Atlantes are columns in the form of Toltec warriors in Tula The word Toltec in Mesoamerican studies has been used in different ways by different scholars to refer to actual populations and polities of pre-Columbian central Mexico or to the mythical ancestors mentioned in the mythical/historical narratives of the Aztecs. It is an ongoing debate whether the Toltecs can be understood to have formed an actual ethnic group at any point in Mesoamerican history or if they are mostly or only a product of Aztec myth. The scholars who have understood the Toltecs to have been an actual ethnic group often connect them to the archeological site of Tula, Hidalgo which is then supposed to have been the Tollan of Aztec myth. This tradition assumes the "Toltec empire" to have dominated much of central Mexico between the 10th and 12th century AD. Other Mexican cities such as Teotihuacán have also been proposed to have been the historical Tollan "Place of Reeds", the city from which the name Tolteca "inhabitant of Tollan" is derived in the Nahuatl language. The term Toltec has also been associated with the arrival of certain Central Mexican cultural traits into the Mayan sphere of dominance that took place in the late classic and early postclassic periods, and the Postclassic Mayan civilizations of Chichén Itzá, Mayapán and the Guatemalan highlands have been referred to as "toltecized" or "mexicanized" Mayas. For example the striking similarities between the city of Tula, Hidalgo and Chichen Itza have often been cited as direct evidence for Toltec dominance of the Postclassic Maya.
    [Show full text]
  • God of the Month: Tlaloc
    God of the Month: Tlaloc Tlaloc, lord of celestial waters, lightning flashes and hail, patron of land workers, was one of the oldest and most important deities in the Aztec pantheon. Archaeological evidence indicates that he was worshipped in Mesoamerica before the Aztecs even settled in Mexico's central highlands in the 13th century AD. Ceramics depicting a water deity accompanied by serpentine lightning bolts date back to the 1st Tlaloc shown with a jaguar helm. Codex Vaticanus B. century BC in Veracruz, Eastern Mexico. Tlaloc's antiquity as a god is only rivalled by Xiuhtecuhtli the fire lord (also Huehueteotl, old god) whose appearance in history is marked around the last few centuries BC. Tlaloc's main purpose was to send rain to nourish the growing corn and crops. He was able to delay rains or send forth harmful hail, therefore it was very important for the Aztecs to pray to him, and secure his favour for the following agricultural cycle. Read on and discover how crying children, lepers, drowned people, moun- taintops and caves were all important parts of the symbolism surrounding this powerful ancient god... Starting at the very beginning: Tlaloc in Watery Deaths Tamoanchan. Right at the beginning of the world, before the gods were sent down to live on Earth as mortal beings, they Aztecs who died from one of a list of the fol- lived in Tamoanchan, a paradise created by the divine lowing illnesses or incidents were thought to Tlaloc vase. being Ometeotl for his deity children. be sent to the 'earthly paradise' of Tlalocan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maya and Their Neighbours Internal and External Contactsthroughtin1e
    The Historical Profile of Kukulcan Jansen, M.E.R.G.N.; van Broekhoven, L.N.K.; Valencia Rivera, R.; Vis, B.; Sachse, F. Citation Jansen, M. E. R. G. N. (2010). The Historical Profile of Kukulcan. Acta Mesoamericana, 22, 89-104. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16341 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/16341 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). ACTA MESOAMERICANA Volume Lama van Broekhoven, Rogelio Valencia Ri vera, Benjamin Vis, Frauke Sachse(eds.) The Maya and their Neighbours Internal and External ContactsThroughTin1e Proceedings of the 10th European Maya Conference Leiden December 9-10,2005 Separata VERLAG ANT ON SAURWElN 2010 Wayeb Advisory Editorial Board Alain Breton Andres Ciudad Ruiz Elizabeth Graham Nikolai Grube Nom1an Hammond Die Deutsche Bibliothek -- CIP Einheitsaufnahme Bin Titelsatz dieser Publikation ist bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek erhiiltlich ISBN 1419-1 Copyright VerlagAnton Saurwein, Markt Schwaben, 20 I 0 Alle Reehte vorbehalten / all rights reserved Fraukc Sachse Druek: Wissner, Miinchen Bindung: Scllmldkon:l, Printed in The Historical Profile of Kukulcan Maarten E.R.G.N. Jansen LEIDEN UNIVERSITY Introduction region between Maya and Mexica, namely those contained in the Nuu Dzaui (Mixtec) In the liminal zone between the Classic and codices, which so far have received little the Postclassic we encounter a Toltec ruler of attention but may be highly pertinent to this legendary proportions, called Kukulcan question.3 (K'uk'ulkan) by the Yucatec Maya and Quetzalcoatl by the Mexica. Both names mean The narrative "Plumed Serpent".
    [Show full text]
  • The Bilimek Pulque Vessel (From in His Argument for the Tentative Date of 1 Ozomatli, Seler (1902-1923:2:923) Called Atten- Nicholson and Quiñones Keber 1983:No
    CHAPTER 9 The BilimekPulqueVessel:Starlore, Calendrics,andCosmologyof LatePostclassicCentralMexico The Bilimek Vessel of the Museum für Völkerkunde in Vienna is a tour de force of Aztec lapidary art (Figure 1). Carved in dark-green phyllite, the vessel is covered with complex iconographic scenes. Eduard Seler (1902, 1902-1923:2:913-952) was the first to interpret its a function and iconographic significance, noting that the imagery concerns the beverage pulque, or octli, the fermented juice of the maguey. In his pioneering analysis, Seler discussed many of the more esoteric aspects of the cult of pulque in ancient highland Mexico. In this study, I address the significance of pulque in Aztec mythology, cosmology, and calendrics and note that the Bilimek Vessel is a powerful period-ending statement pertaining to star gods of the night sky, cosmic battle, and the completion of the Aztec 52-year cycle. The Iconography of the Bilimek Vessel The most prominent element on the Bilimek Vessel is the large head projecting from the side of the vase (Figure 2a). Noting the bone jaw and fringe of malinalli grass hair, Seler (1902-1923:2:916) suggested that the head represents the day sign Malinalli, which for the b Aztec frequently appears as a skeletal head with malinalli hair (Figure 2b). However, because the head is not accompanied by the numeral coefficient required for a completetonalpohualli Figure 2. Comparison of face date, Seler rejected the Malinalli identification. Based on the appearance of the date 8 Flint on front of Bilimek Vessel with Aztec Malinalli sign: (a) face on on the vessel rim, Seler suggested that the face is the day sign Ozomatli, with an inferred Bilimek Vessel, note malinalli tonalpohualli reference to the trecena 1 Ozomatli (1902-1923:2:922-923).
    [Show full text]
  • Encounter with the Plumed Serpent
    Maarten Jansen and Gabina Aurora Pérez Jiménez ENCOUNTENCOUNTEERR withwith thethe Drama and Power in the Heart of Mesoamerica Preface Encounter WITH THE plumed serpent i Mesoamerican Worlds From the Olmecs to the Danzantes GENERAL EDITORS: DAVÍD CARRASCO AND EDUARDO MATOS MOCTEZUMA The Apotheosis of Janaab’ Pakal: Science, History, and Religion at Classic Maya Palenque, GERARDO ALDANA Commoner Ritual and Ideology in Ancient Mesoamerica, NANCY GONLIN AND JON C. LOHSE, EDITORS Eating Landscape: Aztec and European Occupation of Tlalocan, PHILIP P. ARNOLD Empires of Time: Calendars, Clocks, and Cultures, Revised Edition, ANTHONY AVENI Encounter with the Plumed Serpent: Drama and Power in the Heart of Mesoamerica, MAARTEN JANSEN AND GABINA AURORA PÉREZ JIMÉNEZ In the Realm of Nachan Kan: Postclassic Maya Archaeology at Laguna de On, Belize, MARILYN A. MASSON Life and Death in the Templo Mayor, EDUARDO MATOS MOCTEZUMA The Madrid Codex: New Approaches to Understanding an Ancient Maya Manuscript, GABRIELLE VAIL AND ANTHONY AVENI, EDITORS Mesoamerican Ritual Economy: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, E. CHRISTIAN WELLS AND KARLA L. DAVIS-SALAZAR, EDITORS Mesoamerica’s Classic Heritage: Teotihuacan to the Aztecs, DAVÍD CARRASCO, LINDSAY JONES, AND SCOTT SESSIONS Mockeries and Metamorphoses of an Aztec God: Tezcatlipoca, “Lord of the Smoking Mirror,” GUILHEM OLIVIER, TRANSLATED BY MICHEL BESSON Rabinal Achi: A Fifteenth-Century Maya Dynastic Drama, ALAIN BRETON, EDITOR; TRANSLATED BY TERESA LAVENDER FAGAN AND ROBERT SCHNEIDER Representing Aztec Ritual: Performance, Text, and Image in the Work of Sahagún, ELOISE QUIÑONES KEBER, EDITOR The Social Experience of Childhood in Mesoamerica, TRACI ARDREN AND SCOTT R. HUTSON, EDITORS Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya Religion in the Cave Context, KEITH M.
    [Show full text]
  • Aztec Deities
    A ztec Z T E C Deities E I T I E S Aztec Z T E C Deities E I T I Figurte 1 “Roland's Friend: 2002” E S Other Works ™ ramblin/rose publications My Father's Room The Four Season's of the Master Myth If Only…A collaboration with Bill Pearlman Mexican Vibrations, Vibraciones Méxicanas Mexican Secrets, Estrangement and Once Again…Alone; with poems by Bill Pearlman Twenty A Magical Number with Tonalphalli: The Count of Fate & Convergence: 2002 CD/DVD: Gods, Land & People of Mexico Con tu permiso: Dioes, Tierra y Gente de México CD/DVD: Work in Progress: The Four Seasons of the Master Myth Books can be downloaded free: www.salazargallery.com www.E-artbooks.com Aztec Z T E C Deities E I T I Figurte 1 “Roland's Friend: 2002” E S Roland Salazar Rose ™ PUBLISHED BY RAMBLIN/ROSE PUBLICATIONS Images Copyright Roland Salazar Rose 2000-2008 All content, identified in this book “Aztec Deities” published 2008, marked by this notice: “1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11” are “from Wikipedia®, the free encyclopedia and are considered “copyleft”; therefore the following copyright notice applies to each and every page of written text so identified by “1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10&11”. “Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the Cult of Sacred War at Teotihuacan
    The Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the cult of sacred war at Teotihuacan KARLA. TAUBE The Temple of Quetzalcoatl at Teotihuacan has been warrior elements found in the Maya region also appear the source of startling archaeological discoveries since among the Classic Zapotee of Oaxaca. Finally, using the early portion of this century. Beginning in 1918, ethnohistoric data pertaining to the Aztec, Iwill discuss excavations by Manuel Gamio revealed an elaborate the possible ethos surrounding the Teotihuacan cult and beautifully preserved facade underlying later of war. construction. Although excavations were performed intermittently during the subsequent decades, some of The Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the Tezcacoac the most important discoveries have occurred during the last several years. Recent investigations have Located in the rear center of the great Ciudadela revealed mass dedicatory burials in the foundations of compound, the Temple of Quetzalcoatl is one of the the Temple of Quetzalcoatl (Sugiyama 1989; Cabrera, largest pyramidal structures at Teotihuacan. In volume, Sugiyama, and Cowgill 1988); at the time of this it ranks only third after the Pyramid of the Moon and writing, more than eighty individuals have been the Pyramid of the Sun (Cowgill 1983: 322). As a result discovered interred in the foundations of the pyramid. of the Teotihuacan Mapping Project, it is now known Sugiyama (1989) persuasively argues that many of the that the Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the enclosing individuals appear to be either warriors or dressed in Ciudadela are located in the center of the ancient city the office of war. (Mill?n 1976: 236). The Ciudadela iswidely considered The archaeological investigations by Cabrera, to have been the seat of Teotihuacan rulership, and Sugiyama, and Cowgill are ongoing, and to comment held the palaces of the principal Teotihuacan lords extensively on the implications of their work would be (e.g., Armillas 1964: 307; Mill?n 1973: 55; Coe 1981: both premature and presumptuous.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 REMARKS on a NAHUATL HYMN Xippe Ycuic, Totec. Yoallavama
    N68 IV : 2 REMARKS ON A NAHUATL HYMN Xippe ycuic, totec. Yoallavama. Yoalli tlavana, yztleican timonenequia, xiyaquimitlatia teucuitlaque- mitl, xicmoquentiquetl ovia. Noteua, chalchimamatlaco apanaytemoaya, ay, quetzalavevetl, ay quetzalxivicoatl. Nechiya, yquinocauhquetl, oviya. Maniyavia, niavia poliviz, niyoatzin. Achalchiuhtla noyollo; a teu- cuitlatl noyolcevizqui tlacatl achtoquetl tlaquavaya otlacatqui yautla- toaquetl oviya. Noteua, ce intlaco xayailivis conoa yyoatzin motepeyocpa mitzalitta moteua, noyolcevizquin tlacatl achtoquetl tlaquavaya, otlacatqui yau- tlatoaquetl, oviya. —so runs an ancient Mexican hymn to the god Xipe Totec, preserved in a manuscript of the 1580's when the memory of the old faith had not been far submerged beneath the Christian. It was, however, of a far older date than the generation which saw the Conquest. By even that time the meaning had become so obscure through alteration of the language that it required a marginal gloss, which will aid us in 1 This study was found among the late R. H. Barlow's unpublished papers, now preserved at the University of the Americas. The work possibly dates back as early as 1943.44, when he first began to study Náhuati literature. It seems to be typical of his early style, more imagina- tive, less reserved, than his later, more scholarly, manner of writing. It is evident that Barlow had planned to re-write the study in later years. On the first page the following pencil-written words appear: "This would have to be revised some if you're interested. R.H.B." On the back of the last leaf the following criticism (not in the author's handwriting) may be read: "Was the poem the work of 'a poet'? Should be asked if not answered.
    [Show full text]