DOCSLIB.ORG

The Language of Union in the Writings of Moses Maimonides and Moses Nachmanides

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Language of Union in the Writings of Moses Maimonides and Moses Nachmanides Chapter 6 The Language of Union in the Writings of Moses Maimonides and Moses Nachmanides By the middle of the 12th century, Jewish thinkers were exposed to a philo- sophical trend deriving from Aristotelian philosophy, specifically to its later developments in the Arab world. This Neo-Aristotelian trend considered and presented itself as the authentic Aristotelian philosophy; it was highly criti- cal of both Islamic and Jewish Kalam theologies, as well as Neoplatonism. Moses Maimonides is the most important of the Neo-Aristotelian Jewish phi- losophers, using Aristotelian philosophy to develop and deepen a Jewish philo- sophical path yet at the same time articulating a systematic critique of Kalam and Neoplatonic Jewish theology; his writings, especially the Guide for the Perplexed, signifies the shift from Neoplatonic to Neo-Aristotelian influence on Jewish philosophy. Interestingly enough, Kabbalah and Jewish Neo-Aristotelian philosophy emerged around the same time, and shared a fundamental point of view: a deep systematic interest in the nature of God,1 and in the metaphysical realms that mediated between heaven and earth. In this worldview, the gulf between human and metaphysical realms, up to and including divinity itself, is crossable through conjunction and even union with the divine and/or with mediating sub-divine realms and beings. In the 13th century, Jewish philosophy shifted in emphasis towards a more Averroistic interpretation of Aristotle, signified by the central vocabulary and imagery of noetic union (knowledge as union) in this particular trend of thought. In the Jewish Averroistic worldview, the human agent can undergo changes through which his intellect can cleave with the metaphysical active intellect. This was the general atmosphere in which several schools of early Kabbalah first developed. The dominant philosophy in the period of time when Kabbalah emerged, the Neo-Aristotelian trend of Jewish philosophy saw the development of a Jewish vocabulary of both noetic union and spiritual cleaving. The Averroistic interpretation of Aristotle as the dominant philosophy in Judaism (following and interpreting Maimonides’ Guide of the Perplexed) was a crucial engine for the development of radical types of mysticism in early 1 See Jonathan Dauber, Knowledge of God and the Development of Early Kabbalah (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012). © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi ��.��63/97890043�8730_007 Moses Maimonides and Moses Nachmanides 103 Kabbalah.2 This is especially evident in the ecstatic Kabbalah of Abraham Abulafia, who developed a combination of Averroistic-Jewish mysticism.3 In contrast to the Latin (that is, the Christian) world, 13th-century Jewish phi- losophy was willing not only to embrace the idea of a metaphysical ladder that exists between the human agent and the metaphysical realms, rising towards God, but also to allow the human to climb such a ladder all the way to its divine top. Several Kabbalists drew directly on this structure in develop- ing what we might call a Kabbalistic-Averroistic mystical system; others drew on different elements of this theory to explain mostly eschatological unitive states. Since religious life before and after death was considered a continuation process of “climbing” the metaphysical ladder towards God, the language of Neo-Aristotelian union was used to define specific stages on that ladder; for some it was possible to reach that stage of noetic union before death, yet for most it was possible only after the full departure from the material realm. Neo-Aristotelian union, which occurs through the clinging of the intellect (not the soul) to a divine or metaphysical intellect or thought, could be charac- terized as a form of “integrative union”. By uniting with the noetic metaphysical entity—that is, pure thought—the human mind undergoes a process of inte- gration into a universal entity.4 Philip Merlan has discussed Neo-Aristotelian union in contrast to Neoplatonic unio mystica, and suggests the following: This union is, if we may say so, the Neo Aristotelian counterpart of the [Neoplatonic] Unio Mystica usually so called. In this union the individual is absorbed into the universal, i.e. the supra-personal, and this supra- personal is at the same time characterized as the divine5 [. .] The God with whom we are united in ecstasy is not the God-above-thinking-and Being, but rather one who is thought-thinking-itself.6 Neo-Aristotelian union is characterized as “positive”,7 allowing the human- realized intellect to integrate into a metaphysical intellect, possibly God. In this setting, what begins as a conjunction or noetic attachment culminates 2 See: Yossef Swartz, “Magic, Philosophy and Kabbalah: The Mystical and Magical Interpretation of Maimonides in the Later Middle Ages”, DAAT: A Journal of Jewish Philosophy and Kabbalah 64–66 (2009), 99–132 (Hebrew). 3 See: Idel, Studies in Ecstatic Kabbalah, 4–5. 4 See the systematic discussion in Idel, “Universalization”. 5 Merlan, Monopsychism, 19–20. 6 Ibid., 21–22. 7 For the definition of a “positive” union see chapter 1..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OPEN INDIVIDUALISM / NEOMONOPSYCHISM Iacopo Vettori
    1 OPEN INDIVIDUALISM / NEOMONOPSYCHISM Iacopo Vettori This paper summarizes my personal experience in discovering the Open Individualism. Because I found it by my own way, occasionally in the paper I refer to it as “my proposal”, but it would be intended as “the Open Individualism proposal”. By the way, because some issues represent only my personal opinion, and can be evaluated differently from other authors, I left the references as they were. This text can be considered a summary of what I wrote in my personal website dedicated to this subject, that I completed before knowing the book "I Am You" by Daniel Kolak and the other persons who collaborate in this research. The original content of the site was collected in a file in PDF format that can be downloaded at http://www.iacopovettori.it/laterzaipotesi/eng/TheThirdHypothesisSite.pdf I hope that my considerations may be useful when compared with those of people that had the same inspiration, or anyway share our persuasion, to reinforce or develop some aspects of our new vision of the life. INTRODUCTION The problem that has been the occasion to the considerations that I suggest, is expressed by the question "Why I do exist?" or rather, from its more disturbing version: "could I not exist?". As long as you continue to think about our lives in terms of individual minds or souls, you cannot find very compelling reasons that lead to a not elusive answer, that does not resort to subterfuges such as "there is a superior will that wanted me to exist" or the equivalent "I was the recipient
    [Show full text]
  • Monopsychism , Mysticism , Metaconsciousness
    MONOPSYCHISM, MYSTICISM, METACONSCIOUSNESS - aícuov- has a father; ahd by ground Plato means intelligence or the 'mixer' demiurge, who is the of the soul) and the Republic (by 'father' Plato means that which is good and transcendsintelligence ancl being) as well as Plato in general ("in many placeshe calls that which is and the intelligence idea"). He does so to prove that Plato knew that the II THREE NEOARISTOTELIAN AND NEOPLATONIC soul stems from intelligence, and intelligence from that which is one. CONCEPTS:MONOPSYCHISM, MYSTICISM, He, therefore, continues by saying: what I said here is nothing new. METACONSCIOUSNESS It was said not recently but a long time ago, though not explicitly. My present discoursesare interpretations of those ancient ones. That they are old is proven by writings of Plato hirnself. Even the historic Parmenides, Plotinus continues, already equated being and intelligence. True, he called this intelligence also one, (r) I u flepi tdiv rptóv dpXuxóvúrcooróoeav (Enn. V r) Plotinus unrler- whereas it is many. Plato's Parmenides avoíds this statement. He takes to remind the souls which have forgotten their father-god, of discerns a first from a second, and a secondfrom a third. Thus here their true origin and nature. First, every soul should contemplate the again we find the doctrine of the three realms (9úoer,6). 'enlivens' action of the universal soul as she the cosmosand rules it. Anaxagoras calls his intelligence pure and unmixed. He also posits By so doing she will becomemore aware of her own worth. Afterwards that which is first as being simple and the One as being transcendent she should realize that she is a kind of word pronouncedby intelligence (Xc,rpr,oróv).
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Nature in the Medieval Ecological Imagination Jessica Rezunyk Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Winter 12-15-2015 Science and Nature in the Medieval Ecological Imagination Jessica Rezunyk Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Recommended Citation Rezunyk, Jessica, "Science and Nature in the Medieval Ecological Imagination" (2015). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 677. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/677 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of English Dissertation Examination Committee: David Lawton, Chair Ruth Evans Joseph Loewenstein Steven Meyer Jessica Rosenfeld Science and Nature in the Medieval Ecological Imagination by Jessica Rezunyk A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 St. Louis, Missouri © 2015, Jessica Rezunyk Table of Contents List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………. iii Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………………iv Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………vii Chapter 1: (Re)Defining
    [Show full text]
  • The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities
    THE LESTER AND SALLY ENTIN FACULTY OF HUMANITIES The Tel Aviv University undergraduate program is a three year program, offering three study tracks: double-major (dm), single-major (sm) and expanded track studies. Each department offers different options. Please check with each department to find out which study tracks are available. To earn a double-major (dm) BA, students must successfully complete the course of study in two departments. Departments need not be from the same Faculty, but they must both offer a double-major track. Some departments offer a single-major track from the second year of study. Students with outstanding scholastic achievements during their first year of double-major studies may enroll in this track. Please check with the individual departments regarding specific requirements for single-major studies. The departments of Archeology and Ancient Eastern Cultures, History of the Middle East and Africa, Classics—Greece and Rome, Hebrew Culture, and Arabic and Islam Studies offer expanded track studies, combining two fields of study in the same department, from the first year of studies. Admissions • A minimum score of 4501 on the psychometric exam. • Matriculation certificate in compliance with University standards. Some departments may have additional requirements, as specified below. 0631 Arabic and Islamic Studies (dm/sm) The Department of Arabic and Islamic studies offers students the opportunity to acquire theoretical and practical knowledge of classical and modern literary Arabic as well as Islamic religion, history and culture. Equipped with proficiency in the Arabic language, students explore the rich literary, cultural, and religious traditions of the Arab world. Fields of study The department offers two fields of study: • Arabic Language and Literature—acquaints students with the various historical periods in Arabic literature and linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Mu'tazılı Trends in Jewısh Theology
    İslâmî İlimler Dergisi, Yıl 12, Cilt 12, Sayı 2, Güz 2017 (145/178) MU‘tazılı TRENDS ıN JEwıSH THEOLOGY - A BRıEF SURVEY David SKLARE* Abstract This article presents a brief survey of Jewish Mu‘tazilism, from its begin- nings in the late eighth or early ninth century through the seventeenth century. Short descriptions of known Jewish Mu‘tazilî authors and their works are provided. We can divide the development of Jewish Mu‘tazilism into three periods: 1) the early period characterized by eclecticism and doctrinal variety; 2) the “classic” period in which the Basran Bahshamiyya school was adopted by both Rabbanites and Karaites; 3) the late period in which epitomes of Mu‘tazilî thought were produced. The article concludes with a brief consideration of Mu‘tazilism in al-Andalus. Keywords: Mu’tazila, Jewish Theology, Jewish Mu’tazilism, Basra, Kara- ites. YAHUDI TEOLOJISINDE MU’TEZILI EĞILIMLER-KISA BIR TARAMA Öz Bu çalışma, 8.-9. yüzyıllardaki başlangıcından 17. yüzyıla kadar Yahu- di Mu’tezililiği üzerine kısa bir inceleme sunmaktadır. Tanınmış Yahudi Mu’tezilî yazarlar ve onlara ait eserler de çalışmada kısaca tanıtılmıştır. Yahudi Mu’tezililiğinin gelişimini 3 devreye ayırabiliriz: 1) Eklektizm ve doktrin çeşitliliğiyle karakterize edilebilecek olan erken dönem; 2) Basra Bahşamiyye ekolünün Rabbinikler ve Karaylar tarafından benimsendiği “klasik” dönem; 3) Mu’tezile düşüncesinin somut örneklerinin üretildiği geç dönem. Çalışmanın sonunda Yahudi Mu’tezililiğinin Endülüs’teki se- rüveni ile ilgili de kısaca bilgi verilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yahudilik, Mu’tezile, Basra, Karaylar. Makalenin Dergiye Ulaştığı Tarih: 10.10.2017. Yayın Kurulu ve Hakem Değerlendirmesinden Geçen Makalenin Yayına Kabul Edildiği Tarih: 20.11.2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review Jews and Judaism by Hiroshi Ichikawa (Iwanami Shoten, 2019)
    JISMOR 15 Book Review Jews and Judaism by Hiroshi Ichikawa (Iwanami Shoten, 2019) Toshihiro Horikawa This book summarizes 40 years of work by its author, Professor Hiroshi Ichikawa. It also presents findings from the discovery of 1st-century synagogue ruins in the region of Galilee, made in the summer of 2016 in the course of archeological excavations in Israel that Ichikawa has joined for 30 years. In the 1980s, the assertion of his Israeli teacher that “Japan’s prosperity will not last long,” struck a chord with him and made him realize how the Jews, who were forced to live in pagan lands, keenly observed the societies they lived in and prepared themselves for the adversities that awaited them. From this, he surmised that “Maybe we can learn something from the Jews in figuring out our own future, because they had become stronger by recognizing their weaknesses, and had victoriously lived through many harsh realities” (p. ii). He wrote this book in the hope that the modern generation could gain inspiration about living from the lives of the Jews. This book begins with an introductory chapter on “who is a Jew?” followed by four chapters taking up Jewish history, faith, studies, and society. The author provides a comprehensive discussion on the life of the Jews and on Judaism itself from these four perspectives. The introductory chapter defines who the Jews are. The word “Jews” is “Yehudi” in Hebrew, which is referred to the people of the tribe of Judah from the latter half of the period of Solomon’s Temple until that of the Second Temple, or to the people living in the land of Judah as recounted in the Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellect and the Structuring of Reality in Plotinus and Averroes John S
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU School of Architecture, Art, and Historic School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications Preservation 2012 Intellect and the Structuring of Reality in Plotinus and Averroes John S. Hendrix Roger Williams University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Hendrix, John S., "Intellect and the Structuring of Reality in Plotinus and Averroes" (2012). School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications. Paper 29. http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp/29 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intellect and the Structuring of Reality in Plotinus and Averroes John Hendrix Though Averroes is not generally considered to be sympathetic to Neoplatonic thinking, there are definite parallels between the philoso- phies of intellect of Averroes and Plotinus. Both can be considered to be “Idealists” in that intelligible form precedes sensible form in per- ception, and that the material intellect of Averroes or Reason Principle of Plotinus, nous hylikos or pathetikos , depends in its functioning on the agent intellect of Averroes or Intellectual Principle of Plotinus, nous poietikos . The formation of the image in the oculus mentis is co- incident with the formation of a thought, and the sensible form is a transient residue of the permanent intelligible form, as if it is reflected in a mirror and projected on a surface.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neoplatonic and Sufi Wisdom
    119 ISSN 1648-2662. ACTA ORIENTAUA VILNENSIA. 2002 3 FROM ALEXANDRIA TO HARRAN: THE NEOPLATONIC AND SUFI WISDOM Algis UZOAVINYS Institute of Culture, Philosophy and Art The essay deals with the relationship between the Islamic philosophy and Hellenism. The influence of the Neoplatonic ideas on the early Islamic culture of spirituality is emphasized, while trying to reveal the common archetypal patterns of the Near Eastern and Mediterranean traditions. Without philosophy it is impossible to be perfectly pious. Stobaei Hermetica 11 B.2 Islamic Falsa/ah in the Light of Hellenic Sophia Plotinus used the termsophia (crocllt<X) simply as a synonym of "philosophy", hence restoring its primordial meaning. But falsafah as the continuation of CIItA.ocrocjlt<X is not just Hellenic philoso­ phy in Islamic guise. In line with Syrian and Mesopotamian translators (be they Sabians, Ori­ ental Christians or Muslims) the Greek sophia (sapientia) has been connected with Arabic root h-k-m. Sometimes sophia is rendered as 'Urn or even falsafah. Nevertheless, hikmah was chosen as the Arabic equivalent to the Greek termphilosophia, as Franz Rosenthal pointed outl . But philosophy for the Arabs meant the adherence to those philosophic doctrines which they learned chiefly from Neoplatonic commentators of Aristotle as well as Stagirit himself and Alexander Aphrodisias. The termgnosis usually is rendered as ma 'rifah, but many Sufis maintained 'Um as their goal instead of ma'rifah. However, when Sufis spoke of the union (ittihad) they meant an ontic union, not only an epistemic one (ittisal). Therefore, Philip Merlan surmises that it could even be possible that Avicenna sometimes professed both kinds of mysticism, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystical Experience, Religious Doctrine and Philosophical Analysis
    2 [3 181- MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE, RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE ,AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS P. C. Almond, M. A. (Lancast.er), B.D. (Hons) (London), Th. L. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Phi tosophy The Department of Philosophy The University of Adelaide De cember, 1978. ''i,\"6-¡'(,,r-í.¡r',,' ii t ti/'i I;t . i rt ¡t(¡ ' { TABLE OF CONTENTS P age III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.. ..... Vi INTRODUCTION: THE PROBLEM OF UNITY AND DIVER- SITY IN RELIGIONS I CHAPTER ONE : R. C. ZAEHNER: THE VARIITIES OF MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE 30 CHAPTER TWO : N. SMART: THE MYSTICAL, THE NUMINOUS AND RELIGIOUS TRADI- TIONS... 64 CHAPTER THREE: W. T. STACE: EXTROVERTIVE AND INTROVERTIVE MYSTICISM tlt CHAPTER FOUR: R. OTTO: THE MYSTICAL, THE NUMINOUS AND METAPHYS I CS 156 CHAPTER FIVE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 204 CHAPTER SIX : MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE AND ITS IN- TERPRETATION: AN ANALYSIS OF POSSIBLE MODELS. 213 CHAPTER SEVEN: THE VARIETIES OF MYSTICAL EX- PERIENCE: A PHILOSOPHICAL PROLEGOMENON 254 STLECT BIBLI OGRAPHY 295 SUMMA R Y The spiritual vacuum generated by the decline of t.he Christian world-view in the West has creaLed for Western man the opportunity of taking up any one of a variety of modes of spirituality. Religious diversity has become a fact in Western religious Iife. This increasj-ng pluralism has led to a real-isation of the philosophical problem in- herent in it, a probl-em crystallised in the so-called 'con- flicting truth cl-aimsr problem:- The different religions appear to make different and incompatible cl-aims about the nature of ultimate re afity, of divinity, ofl human nature , and cosmi c destiny .
    [Show full text]
  • Limda Undergraduate Jewish Studies Journal ______
    3/7/2019 Limda Vol.1 2019/5779 Winter-Spring - Google Docs 2019/5779 Winter­Spring Vol.1 Issue I Limda Undergraduate Jewish Studies Journal __________________________ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F_RR_AQ1hsI72cIVV9wNK2dCS7fXEXxHLB8mXe0B5Pw/edit 1/101 3/7/2019 Limda Vol.1 2019/5779 Winter-Spring - Google Docs Limda Vol.1 Issue I 2 Letter from the Editor Welcome to the first issue of Limda Undergraduate Jewish Studies Journal! We started this journal out of curiosity - curiosity over what our fellow undergraduate students are writing about and researching regarding Judaic topics. What new ideas are people proposing on Halakha and Tanakh, what observations are people making about Jewish history, what arguments are people having regarding Jewish philosophy? What is our generation thinking about Judaism? In publishing undergraduates’ Judaically related essays and providing people with a forum to share their research with a broader community, we want to get people talking. We want to empower students to share their ideas. We want to foster conversations between undergraduates with diverse perspectives with the hope of creating a broader understanding of Judaism as a whole. This 2019 Winter-Spring issue of Limda includes nine essays written on a variety of topics, ranging from Jewish history to language to philosophy to Halakha to Tanakh to Israel. We kick off with Pamela Brenner’s “K erakheym Ov Al Bonim : Tevye’s Quotations Revisited” in which we are taken on a journey of analysis through the character of Tevye the Dairyman and his improper - or proper? - use of Biblical quotations. We then feature Arielle Solomon’s “R ebecca: The Guardian of Bloodline and Covenant ,” which offers a refreshing and innovative commentary on the Biblical Rebecca’s role in the founding of the Jewish People.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Theology in the Thirteenth Century and the Origins of Secularism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Mary Immaculate Research Repository and Digital Archive Article Catholic Theology in the Thirteenth Century and the Origins of Secularism Rik Van Nieuwenhove Mary Immaculate College, Limerick Abstract This article examines two distinct responses to the reception of Aristotle in the thirteenth century: the Bonaventurean and the Thomist. The outcome of this debate (and the Condemnations of 1277) led to the modern separation of faith and reason. Rather than seeing voluntarism and nominalism as the cause of the modern separation of faith and reason, and theology and philosophy, it will be suggested that it is actually the other way around: the Bonaventurean response indirectly resulted in the growing separation of faith and reason, which led, in turn, to voluntarism. It is important not to confuse the Thomist and Franciscan responses, as sometimes happens in recent scholarship, including in the work of Gavin D’Costa, as will be shown. Both the Thomist and the Bonaventurean approaches are legitimate resources to respond to the (post)-secular context in which we find ourselves, and the former should not be reduced to the latter. Keywords Aquinas and Bonaventure, faith and reason, origins of modernity n this article I want to revisit debates that took place at the end of the thirteenth cen- Itury. From a historical point of view it is exactly in this period that we find the origins of secularism and modernity, especially the growing separation of faith
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter the MIND–SOUL PROBLEM
    200437. Ashgatebundel Paul Bakker; 02_Chapter2. Proef 1. 14-11-2006:11.02, page 1. chapter THE MIND–SOUL PROBLEM Robert Pasnau . Introduction Few notions about the history of philosophy are more widely held than the no- tion that Descartes began something important in the way we think about the mind. But what exactly did he begin? A good place to look for an answer to this question is the start of his caustic set of replies to Gassendi, where Descartes cla- rifies a point of terminology. On his usage, he explains, the term ‘mind’ should be taken not in the traditional way, as referring to a part of the soul, but as refer- ring to the whole soul. Hence the two terms, ‘mind’ (mens)and‘soul’(anima), are to be treated as co-referential: ‘I consider the mind not as a part of the soul, but as the whole soul that thinks’.1 To be sure, this is no mere point of terminology. On the contrary, his erasure of the distinction between mind and soul constitutes the most fundamental respect in which Descartes’s conception of mind has influ- enced our own. In fact, one might reasonably think of this passage as marking out a kind of dividing line between medieval psychology and modern philosophy of mind. In what follows I will consider some of the medieval background to Descartes’s position, and show how this dividing line, though significant, is less clear than one might suppose. But before turning back to that earlier tradition, it is worth a closer look at how Descartes accounts for his choice of terminology.
    [Show full text]