Systematics and Taxonomy: Follow-Up

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Systematics and Taxonomy: Follow-Up HOUSE OF LORDS Science and Technology Committee 5th Report of Session 2007–08 Systematics and Taxonomy: Follow-up Report with Evidence Ordered to be printed 21 July 2008 and published 13 August 2008 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 162 Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Lords in each session “to consider science and technology”. Current Membership The Members of the Science and Technology Committee are: Lord Colwyn Lord Crickhowell Lord Haskel Lord Howie of Troon Lord Krebs Lord May of Oxford Lord Methuen Earl of Northesk Lord O’Neill of Clackmannan Lord Patel Earl of Selborne Lord Sutherland of Houndwood (Chairman) Lord Taverne Lord Warner Information about the Committee and Publications Information about the Science and Technology Committee, including details of current inquiries, can be found on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/hlscience/. Committee publications, including reports, press notices, transcripts of evidence and government responses to reports, can be found at the same address. Committee reports are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. General Information General information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/about_lords/about_lords.cfm. Contacts for the Science and Technology Committee All correspondence should be addressed to: The Clerk of the Science and Technology Committee Committee Office House of Lords London SW1A 0PW The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6075. The Committee’s email address is [email protected]. CONTENTS Paragraph Page Abstract 7 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Importance of systematic biology 1.1 9 Previous reports 1.3 9 Our current inquiry 1.8 10 Acknowledgements 1.11 12 Chapter 2: The Role of Systematic Biology in the Delivery of Policies 13 Range of policy areas involving systematic biology 2.1 13 Conservation of biodiversity in a global context 2.2 13 Conservation of UK biodiversity 2.4 14 Protection against invasive alien species 2.5 14 Responding to climate change 2.6 14 Capacity building 2.7 14 Adapting to ecosystem services analysis 2.8 15 Policing global trade in endangered species 2.9 15 Promoting public engagement in environmental issues 2.10 15 Identification of emerging diseases and disease surveillance 2.11 15 Taxonomic skills in the private sector 2.12 16 Conclusion 2.13 16 Chapter 3: Health of the Discipline in the UK: Professional Taxonomists, Volunteers and Recruitment 17 Taxonomists in the UK: general picture 3.1 17 UK university sector 3.3 17 Wider science community 3.4 17 Taxonomists in the UK: age profile 3.6 18 Sectors in crisis 3.8 19 Classification of taxonomic activity 3.10 19 Descriptive taxonomy 3.12 20 Identification 3.16 21 Phylogenetic systematics 3.19 22 Supply and demand 3.20 22 Importance of the voluntary sector 3.22 23 Recruitment 3.26 23 Inspiring a new generation 3.26 23 Taxonomy in schools and the importance of field studies 3.28 24 Regional museums and reference collections 3.29 24 Training 3.30 25 Mentoring for volunteers 3.32 25 Chapter 4: Tools and Technology for the Twenty-First Century 27 Opportunities 4.1 27 Digitisation of collections and the Internet 4.3 27 Barcoding 4.10 29 DNA-based taxonomy and the morphological approach 4.13 30 Keys and handbooks 4.15 30 Research collections 4.17 31 National Biodiversity Network 4.20 31 Chapter 5: Funding 33 Diversity of funding sources 5.1 33 Funding by NERC 5.4 33 Production of identification keys and field guides 5.7 34 CABI fungi collection 5.9 34 Chapter 6: Government Awareness 36 Overview 6.1 36 Defra 6.2 36 DIUS: Research Councils 6.6 37 DIUS: HEFCE and the RAE 6.10 38 Environment Research Funders’ Forum 6.15 39 DCMS 6.17 39 Awareness in Government 6.18 39 Chapter 7: Conclusions and Recommendations 40 Appendix 1: Science and Technology Committee 44 Appendix 2: List of Witnesses 46 Appendix 3: Call for Evidence 49 Appendix 4: Seminar at the Natural History Museum 51 Appendix 5: List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 56 Oral Evidence Professor Stephen Hopper and Dr Eimear Nic Lughadha (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew); Professor Mary Gibby, Director of Science (Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh); Dr Michael Dixon and Professor Richard Lane (The Natural History Museum) Written Evidence from The Natural History Museum, RBG Edinburgh, and RBG Kew 1 Oral Evidence (19 February 2008) 22 Dr Pamela Kempton (NERC); Professor Georgina Mace (NERC Collaborative Centre); Dr Colin Miles and Dr Alf Game (BBSRC); Professor Philip Esler (AHRC); Professor Brian Cathcart (Kingston University); Dr Ben Cowell (DCMS); Dr Miles Parker and Professor Nicola Spence (Defra); and Dr Liam Kelly (The Scottish Government) Written Evidence from the Research Councils UK, Defra, DCMS 36 Oral Evidence (11 March 2008) 58 Supplementary Evidence from Defra, DCMS and the Research Councils UK 76 Professor David Cutler and Dr Sandra Knapp (Linnean Society); Professor Richard Bateman (Systematics Association); Professor Rick Battarbee (University College London); Professor Richard Gornall (Botanical Society of the British Isles); Dr Alastair Culham (University of Reading) Written Evidence from the BSBI, the Systematics Association, the Linnean Society, University of Reading and UCL 85 Oral Evidence (25 March 2008) 122 Supplementary Evidence from the Systematics Association 141 Sir Neil Chalmers and Dr Jim Munford (National Biodiversity Network Trust); Dr Mark Hill (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology); Dr Ian McLean (Joint Nature Conservation Committee); Dr Richard Fortey (Geological Society) Written Evidence from the JNCC and the National Biodiversity Network Trust 143 Oral Evidence (29 April 2008) 149 Dr Alf Game and Mr Steven Visscher (BBSRC); Professor Alan Thorpe (NERC); Ian Pearson MP, Minister of State for Science and Innovation (DIUS) Written Evidence 162 Oral Evidence (6 May 2008) 162 Rt Hon Lord Rooker (Defra); Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP (DCMS) Oral Evidence (21 May 2008) 177 Written Evidence Mr Henry Barlow 187 Biological Recording in Scotland 188 BioNET-INTERNATIONAL 190 Biosciences Federation 193 Booth Museum of Natural History 203 Dr Janet Bradford-Grieve 205 The British Embassy (Rome) 206 The British Lichen Society 208 The British Mycological Society 214 The British Phycological Society 217 Buglife 221 CAB International 224 Centre for Plant Diversity & Systematics, University of Reading 226 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford 231 Dr Henry Disney 232 EMLRC (Leicestershire County Council) 233 EDIT Consortium 235 Mr Bill Ely 239 Dr Genoveva Esteban 241 European Mycological Association 243 Global Biodiversity Information Facility 250 E F Greenwood 252 Hertfordshire Natural History Society 254 International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 257 Professor Marcel Jaspars 264 Mrs Patricia Lorber 265 Professor Amyan Macfadyen 266 Mycology sub-committee UK BRAG 267 National Federation for Biological Recording 272 National Museum Liverpool 274 National Museum Wales 278 National Science Collections Association 283 Mr Adrian Norris 284 Plant Diversity Challenge Steering Group 285 Plantlife International 289 The Royal Entomological Society 294 The Royal Horticultural Society 296 School of Computer Science, Cardiff University 300 The Scottish Environment Protection Agency 302 Society for General Microbiology 303 UK Biodiversity Research Advisory Group & the Global Biodiversity Sub-Committee of the UK 309 Dr John Waland Ismay 317 Professor Roy Watling 320 Wellcome Trust 321 The Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester & North Merseyside 322 Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union 324 NOTE: References in the text of the report are as follows: (Q) refers to a question in oral evidence (p) refers to a page of written evidence ABSTRACT ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Systematic biology is at the heart of our understanding of the natural world. In this time of climate change, understanding the connection between the natural world and human well-being—understanding the value and dynamic of “ecosystem services”—has a vital importance more widely recognised than ever before. “Ecosystem services” is a concept which has developed an importance in recent years to the point where it now sets the context of the current debate on environment sustainability. Simply defined, ecosystem services are “the benefits we derive from natural ecosystems”. This is our third inquiry into systematics and taxonomy. We reported in 1992, under the chairmanship of Lord Dainton, with a follow-up inquiry in 2001–02 under the chairmanship of Baroness Walmsley. We chose to embark on this inquiry now because of the environmental imperatives increasingly manifest in our daily lives. We have asked two questions in particular: whether systematic biology in the UK is in a fit state to generate the essential taxonomic information required to understand ecosystem services and whether the UK has the skills available to understand and predict the impact of climate change on biodiversity. We have concluded that the state of systematics and taxonomy in the UK, both in terms of the professional taxonomic community and volunteers, is unsatisfactory— in some areas, such as mycology, to the point
Recommended publications
  • SLAM Project
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e69924 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e69924 Data Paper SLAM Project - Long Term Ecological Study of the Impacts of Climate Change in the natural forest of Azores: I - the spiders from native forests of Terceira and Pico Islands (2012-2019) Ricardo Costa‡, Paulo A. V. Borges‡,§ ‡ cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores, Rua Capitão João d’Ávila, São Pedro, 9700-042, Angra do Heroismo, Azores, Portugal § IUCN SSC Mid-Atlantic Islands Specialist Group,, Angra do Heroísmo, Azores, Portugal Corresponding author: Paulo A. V. Borges ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pedro Cardoso Received: 09 Jun 2021 | Accepted: 05 Jul 2021 | Published: 01 Sep 2021 Citation: Costa R, Borges PAV (2021) SLAM Project - Long Term Ecological Study of the Impacts of Climate Change in the natural forest of Azores: I - the spiders from native forests of Terceira and Pico Islands (2012-2019). Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e69924. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e69924 Abstract Background Long-term monitoring of invertebrate communities is needed to understand the impact of key biodiversity erosion drivers (e.g. habitat fragmentation and degradation, invasive species, pollution, climatic changes) on the biodiversity of these high diverse organisms. The data we present are part of the long-term project SLAM (Long Term Ecological Study of the Impacts of Climate Change in the natural forest of Azores) that started in 2012, aiming to understand the impact of biodiversity erosion drivers on Azorean native forests (Azores, Macaronesia, Portugal). In this contribution, the design of the project, its objectives and the first available data for the spider fauna of two Islands (Pico and Terceira) are described.
    [Show full text]
  • Can You Make Morphometrics Work When You Know the Right Answer? Pick and Mix Approaches for Apple Identification
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Can you make morphometrics work when you know the right answer? Pick and mix approaches for apple identification 1¤ 2 1 Maria D. ChristodoulouID , Nicholas Hugh Battey , Alastair CulhamID * 1 University of Reading Herbarium, Harborne Building, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom, 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights Reading, United Kingdom a1111111111 ¤ Current address: Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Morphological classification of living things has challenged science for several centuries and has led to a wide range of objective morphometric approaches in data gathering and analy- sis. In this paper we explore those methods using apple cultivars, a model biological system OPEN ACCESS in which discrete groups are pre-defined but in which there is a high level of overall morpho- Citation: Christodoulou MD, Battey NH, Culham A logical similarity. The effectiveness of morphometric techniques in discovering the groups is (2018) Can you make morphometrics work when you know the right answer? Pick and mix evaluated using statistical learning tools. No one technique proved optimal in classification approaches for apple identification. PLoS ONE on every occasion, linear morphometric techniques slightly out-performing geometric 13(10): e0205357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. (72.6% accuracy on test set versus 66.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • Electrophysiological Evidence of RML12 Mosquito Cell Line Towards Neuronal Differentiation by 20-Hydroxyecdysdone
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Electrophysiological evidence of RML12 mosquito cell line towards neuronal diferentiation by Received: 2 January 2018 Accepted: 7 June 2018 20-hydroxyecdysdone Published: xx xx xxxx Julie Gaburro 1,2, Jean-Bernard Duchemin 1, Prasad N. Paradkar 1, Saeid Nahavandi2 & Asim Bhatti 2 Continuous cell lines from insect larval tissues are widely used in diferent research domains, such as virology, insect immunity, gene expression, and bio pharmacology. Previous study showed that introduction of 20-hydroxyecdysone to Spodoptera cell line induced a neuron-like morphology with neurite extensions. Despite some results suggesting potential presence of neuro-receptors, no study so far has shown that these neuron-induced cells were functional. Here, using microelectrode arrays, we showed that the mosquito cell line, RML12, diferentiated with 20-hydroxyecdysone, displays spontaneous electrophysiological activity. Results showed that these cells can be stimulated by GABAergic antagonist as well as nicotinic agonist. These results provide new evidence of neuron-like functionality of 20-hydroxyecdysone induced diferentiated mosquito cell line. Finally, we used this new model to test the efects of two insecticides, temephos and permethrin. Our analysis revealed signifcant changes in the spiking activity after the introduction of these insecticides with prolonged efect on the neuronal activity. We believe that this diferentiated mosquito neuronal cell model can be used for high-throughput screening of new pesticides on insect nervous system instead of primary neurons or in vivo studies. Neuroactive insecticides remain the principal protection against insects, either to protect crops, livestock or humans from depredation and pathogens transmitted by vectors1. Te need of functional neurons is very impor- tant to identify new compounds and study insecticide efects on the insect nervous system in vitro, which is still not well understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbarium News
    Herbarium News University of Reading Herbarium Newsletter Issue No. 45, December 2008. ISSN 0953-0080 URL: www.herbarium.reading.ac.uk INTRODUCTION Welcome to another Christmas Herbarium News. As with every edition we have much to report! During the last year a number of important things have happened, not least the refurbishment of two of our taxonomy laboratories (more details below). We have also changed the name of our building from ‘Plant Science Laboratories’ to ‘The Harborne Building’ to commemorate Jeffrey Harborne, FRS, our late lamented phytochemist. This is in line with University policy to name buildings after people, and the new biomolecular sciences building (behind Chemistry) for our medical and pharmacy researchers will be called the Hopkins Building, after the late Professor Harold Hopkins, sometime Professor in Physics here who developed fibre optics and the endoscope. The Herbarium has been especially busy having now completed the incorporation of the Herbarium from the University of Southampton, again see below. HERBARIUM REVIEW AND STRATEGY Our School of Biological Sciences recently undertook a review of the Herbarium, along with the Cole Museum of Zoology and a number of other issues. Ours was led by Professor Philip John with Professor Martin Bell (Archaeology), Kate Arnold-Foster (Head of the University’s Museums and Special Collections Service and Dr Karen Henderson (Head of Technical Services, Biological Sciences). They were very positive and have recommended that a Herbarium Strategy be drawn up for the next five years, currently in progress. Senate also positively noted the Herbarium’s growing level of engagement with the University and the likely increase in the commercial value of this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • RHS Gardening in a Changing Climate Report
    Gardening in a Changing Climate Acknowledgements The RHS and University of Reading would like to acknowledge the support provided by Innovate UK through the short Knowledge Transfer Partnership KTP 1000769 from November 2012 to September 2013. The RHS is grateful to the Trustees of Spencer Horticultural Trust, who supported the project to revise the Gardening in the Global Greenhouse report. The RHS would also like to thank: The authors of the 2002 report, Richard Bisgrove and Professor Paul Hadley, for building the foundations for this updated report. The contributors of this report: Dr John David (RHS), Dr Ross Cameron (University of Sheffield), Dr Alastair Culham (University of Reading), Kathy Maskell (Walker Institute, University of Reading) and Dr Claudia Bernardini (KTP Research Associate). Dr Mark McCarthy (Met Office) and Professor Tim Sparks (Coventry University) for their expert consultation on the climate projections and phenology chapters, respectively. This document is available to download as a free PDF at: Gardening in a www.rhs.org.uk/climate-change Citation Changing Climate Webster E, Cameron RWF and Culham A (2017) Gardening in a Changing Climate, Royal Horticultural Society, UK. Eleanor Webster, About the authors Ross Cameron and Dr Eleanor Webster is a Climate Scientist at the Royal Horticultural Alastair Culham Society Dr Ross Cameron is a Senior Lecturer in Landscape Management, Ecology & Design at the University of Sheffield Dr Alastair Culham is an Associate Professor of Botany at the University of Reading Gardening in a Changing Climate RHS 2 3 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 3.4 The UK’s variable weather and its implications for projections of future climate .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • John Hooper - Pioneer British Batman
    NEWSLETTER AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON VOLUME 26 x NUMBER xJULY 2010 THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Registered Charity Number 220509 Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF Tel. (+44) (0)20 7434 4479; Fax: (+44) (0)20 7287 9364 e-mail: [email protected]; internet: www.linnean.org President Secretaries Council Dr Vaughan Southgate BOTANICAL The Officers and Dr Sandra D Knapp Prof Geoffrey Boxshall Vice-Presidents Prof Mark Chase Dr Mike Fay ZOOLOGICAL Prof Dianne Edwards Dr Sandra D Knapp Dr Malcolm Scoble Mr Alistair Land Dr Keith Maybury Dr Terry Langford Dr Malcolm Scoble EDITORIAL Mr Brian Livingstone Dr John R Edmondson Prof Geoff Moore Treasurer Ms Sara Oldfield Professor Gren Ll Lucas OBE COLLECTIONS Dr Sylvia Phillips Mrs Susan Gove Mr Terence Preston Executive Secretary Dr Mark Watson Dr Ruth Temple Librarian Dr David Williams Mrs Lynda Brooks Prof Patricia Willmer Financial Controller/Membership Mr Priya Nithianandan Deputy Librarian Conservator Mr Ben Sherwood Ms Janet Ashdown Building and Office Manager Ms Victoria Smith Honorary Archivist Conservation Assistant Ms Gina Douglas Ms Lucy Gosnay Communications Manager Ms Claire Inman Special Publications and Education Manager Ms Leonie Berwick Office Assistant Mr Tom Helps THE LINNEAN Newsletter and Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London ISSN 0950-1096 Edited by Brian G Gardiner Editorial ................................................................................................................ 1 Society News..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agriotypus Armatus Curtis, 1832, a Parasitoid of Silo Pallipes Fabricius, 1781: the first Record for the Balkan Peninsula K
    Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (2014) 414, 05 http://www.kmae-journal.org c ONEMA, 2014 DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2014016 Agriotypus armatus Curtis, 1832, a parasitoid of Silo pallipes Fabricius, 1781: the first record for the Balkan Peninsula K. Bjelanovic´ (1),I.Živic´ (1),,A.Petrovic´ (1), J. Djordjevic´ (2),Z.Markovic´ (3), V. Ž ik ic´ (4) Received January 12, 2014 Revised March 25, 2014 Accepted March 27, 2014 ABSTRACT Key-words: Among the diverse order of Hymenoptera, aquatic species are of special Agriotypus, interest. During macrozoobenthos sampling in the rivers of Serbia in 2003 parasitoid, and during the period 2011−2012, pupae of Silo pallipes Fabricius, 1781 Serbia, were recorded which were parasitized by an ichneumonid wasp Agrioty- distribution, pus armatus Curtis, 1832, this being the first record of it for the Balkan ecological Peninsula. A total of 217 A. armatus specimens were collected at 29 local- parameters ities situated along 16 watercourses of Serbia. All four parasitoid stages (egg, larva, pupa and resting adult) were recorded. The identity of the par- asitoid was confirmed using standard molecular methods. This study also focuses on the ecology of the parasitoid and its host. The widespread dis- tribution of A. armatus in Europe suggests the presence of this species in other Balkan countries, but this has not yet been confirmed due to a lack of surveys and/or the constantly increasing pollution of freshwaters. RÉSUMÉ Agriotypus armatus Curtis 1832, un parasitoïde de Silo pallipes Fabricius, 1781 : premier enregistrement dans la péninsule des Balkans Mots-clés : Parmi l’ordre diversifié des hyménoptères, les espèces aquatiques sont d’un inté- Agriotypus, rêt particulier.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica 46 1
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Newsletter of the Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2009 Band/Volume: 46 Autor(en)/Author(s): diverse Artikel/Article: Newsletter of the Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica 46 1 News – Nachrichten – Nouvelles ISSN 0721-8117 News is published by the Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica at irregular intervals. Editor: Willy De Prins, Dorpstraat 401B, B-3061 Leefdaal, Belgium. Tel. +32.2.305.37.32 E-mail: [email protected] www.soceurlep.org 15 May 2009 Nr. 46 Contents: 16th European Congress of Lepidopterology Cluj, Romania, 25–31 May 2009 .............................................................. 2 Preliminary programme .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Posters ............................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Where is Nota lepidopterologica?................................................................................................................................. 11 Editorial Board's request for help .................................................................................................................................. 11 Changes to the list of members ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetics of the Neotropical Butterfly Subtribe Oleriina
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 (2010) 1032–1041 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular phylogenetics of the neotropical butterfly subtribe Oleriina (Nymphalidae: Danainae: Ithomiini) Donna Lisa de-Silva a,*, Julia J. Day a, Marianne Elias b,c, Keith Willmott d, Alaine Whinnett a, James Mallet a a Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK b Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK c CNRS, UMR 7205, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 45 Rue Buffon, CP50, 75005 Paris, France d McGuire Center for Lepidoptera, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, P.O. Box 112710, Gainesville, FL 32611-2710, USA article info abstract Article history: The Oleriina is one of the most speciose subtribes of the neotropical nymphalid butterfly tribe Ithomiini. Received 9 September 2009 They are widely distributed across the Andes and Amazonian lowlands and like other ithomiines they are Revised 22 December 2009 involved in complex mimicry rings. This subtribe is of particular interest because it contains the most Accepted 9 January 2010 diverse ithomiine genus, Oleria, as well as two genera, Megoleria and Hyposcada, that feed on hostplants Available online 15 January 2010 not utilized elsewhere in the tribe. Here we present the first comprehensive species-level phylogeny for the Oleriina, representing 83% of recognised species in the group, and based on 6698 bp from eight mito- Keywords: chondrial (mt) and nuclear (nc) genes. Topologies are largely congruent for ncDNA and the concatenated Lepidoptera dataset and the genera Oleria, Hyposcada and Megoleria are recovered and well-supported, although Speciation Phylogeny strongly discordant genealogy between mtDNA and ncDNA suggest possible introgression among Hypos- Hybridization cada and Megoleria.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) on Douglas-Fir Foliage
    Development of the Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) on Douglas-fir Foliage JEFFREY C. MILLER, PAUL E. HANSON, AND DIANA N. KIMBERLING2 Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2907 J. Econ. EntomoL 84(2): 461-465 (1991) ABSTRACT Survival of larvae, developmental time, consumption, live weights, frass pro- duction, pupal weights, and adult female ova production of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), were monitored in the laboratory for a comparison of performance between a standard synthetic diet and Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. Gypsy moth survival (96%), larval development (40 and 34 d at 22"C for females and males, respectively), and pupal weight (1,845 mg and 560 mg for females and males, respectively) on the standard synthetic diet were very similar to data found in the literature regarding highly suitable diets. However, performance of the gypsy moth on Douglas-fir was indicative of a suboptimal host. Survival of first instars on Douglas-fir ranged from 0 to 84%, depending upon temper- ature and foliage age. Development from first instar eclosion to pupation averaged 44.0 d (males) and 58.3 d (females) at 22C. Male and female larvae consumed an average of 2,040.6 mg and 6,136.1 mg dry weight of foliage, respectively. Frass production averaged 1,277.9 mg (males) and 3,526.7 mg (females) dry weight. Values were low for nutritional indices of efficiency of conversion of ingested food (4.5-4.9%) and efficiency of conversion of digested food (11.4-12.1%). Live pupal weights averaged 424.2 mg (male) and 1,249.8 mg (female).
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Outcomes for Health Information Management (Version 3)
    LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (VERSION 3) DIPLOMA AND UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS Copyright © CHIMA June 2015 Version 3 Second version © CHIMA 2010 First published © CHIMA 2006 Adapted from the Learning Outcomes for Health Records Education (LOHRE) © CHIMA 1995 by the Canadian Health Information Management Association. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Canadian Health Information Management Association. Learning Outcomes for Health Information Management Canadian Health Information Management Association 99 Enterprise Dr. S., Lower Level London, ON N6N 1B9 Canada Copyright ©2015 by the Canadian Health Information Management Association CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Kelly Abrams, BHA, MPA, CHIM Claire Dixon-Lee, PhD, RHIA, CPH, FAHIMA Editor Executive Director Vice President, Education and Professional Practice Commission on Accreditation for Health Informatics CHIMA and Information Management Education Neil Gardner, MPA, CPHIMS-CA Candace Gibson, PhD, CHIM Chief Information Officer Associate Professor, Dept of Pathology Saskatchewan Health Program Coordinator, HIM University of Western Ontario Kerry Johnson, MAEd, CHIM Dr. Yuri Kagolovsky, MD, MSc Academic Associate, HIM Program Professor, Health Informatics Faculty of Health Sciences School of Health and Life Sciences and University of Ontario Institute of Technology
    [Show full text]
  • A Window to the World of Global Insect Declines: Moth Biodiversity Trends Are Complex SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE and Heterogeneous David L
    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE A window to the world of global insect declines: Moth biodiversity trends are complex SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE and heterogeneous David L. Wagnera,1, Richard Foxb, Danielle M. Salcidoc, and Lee A. Dyerc Edited by Matthew L. Forister, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, and accepted by Editorial Board Member May R. Berenbaum October 13, 2020 (received for review March 20, 2020) Moths are the most taxonomically and ecologically diverse insect taxon for which there exist considerable time-series abundance data. There is an alarming record of decreases in moth abundance and diversity from across Europe, with rates varying markedly among and within regions. Recent reports from Costa Rica reveal steep cross-lineage declines of caterpillars, while other sites (Ecuador and Arizona, reported here) show no or only modest long-term decreases over the past two decades. Rates of decline for dietary and ecological specialists are steeper than those for ecologically generalized taxa. Additional traits com- monly associated with elevated risks include large wingspans, small geographic ranges, low dispersal ability, and univoltinism; taxa associated with grasslands, aridlands, and nutrient-poor habitats also appear to be at higher risk. In temperate areas, many moth taxa limited historically by abiotic factors are increas- ing in abundance and range. We regard the most important continental-scale stressors to include reduc- tions in habitat quality and quantity resulting from land-use change and climate change and, to a lesser extent, atmospheric nitrification and introduced species. Site-specific stressors include pesticide use and light pollution. Our assessment of global macrolepidopteran population trends includes numerous cases of both region-wide and local losses and studies that report no declines.
    [Show full text]