The Zoogeomorphology of Case-Building Caddisfly Larvae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Zoogeomorphology of Case-Building Caddisfly Larvae The zoogeomorphology of case-building caddisfly larvae by Richard Mason A Doctoral thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University (June 2020) © Richard Mason 2020 i Abstract Caddisfly (Trichoptera) are an abundant and widespread aquatic insect group. Caddisfly larvae of most species build cases from silk and fine sediment at some point in their lifecycle. Case- building caddisfly have the potential to modify the distribution and transport of sediment by: 1) altering sediment properties through case construction, and 2) transporting sediment incorporated into cases over the riverbed. This thesis investigates, for the first time, the effects of bioconstruction by case-building caddisfly on fluvial geomorphology. The research was conducted using two flume experiments to understand the mechanisms of caddisfly zoogeomorphology (case construction and transporting sediment), and two field investigations that increase the spatial and temporal scale of the research. Caddisfly cases varied considerably in mass between species (0.001 g - 0.83 g) and grain sizes used (D50 = 0.17 mm - 4 mm). As a community, caddisfly used a wide range of grain-sizes in case construction (0.063 mm – 11 mm), and, on average, the mass of incorporated sediment was 38 g m-2, in a gravel-bed stream. This sediment was aggregated into biogenic particles (cases) which differed in size and shape from their constituent grains. A flume experiment determined that empty cases of some caddisfly species (tubular case-builders; Limnephilidae and Sericostomatidae) were more mobile than their incorporated sediment, but that dome shaped Glossosomatidae cases moved at the same entrainment threshold as their constituent grains, highlighting the importance of case design as a control on caddisfly zoogeomorphology. A second flume experiment found that crawling Glossosomatidae larvae transport sand vertically upwards, from sheltered interstices below gravel particles, onto the surface of armoured gravel-beds, increasing the hydraulic exposure of this sediment. As a result of both larvae crawling and case entrainment, case-building caddisfly were responsible for over 30% of coarse sand transport during low to medium discharge conditions in a gravel-bed stream. Tubular case-builders (especially Limnephilidae) and dome case-builders (Glossosomatidae) were particularly important zoogeomorphic agents, using and transporting substantial amounts of coarse sand and fine gravel. This research has shown that case bioconstruction by caddisfly larvae may have a destabilising effect on sand in gravel-bed rivers. The thesis uses case design to conceptualise and understand caddisfly zoogeomorphology under differing biotic and abiotic controls. Future research should consider sediment stabilisation associated with caddisfly pupation, and the relative importance of destabilisation and stabilisation across spatial and temporal gradients. The broad geographic spread, functional diversity, and commonly high abundances of case-building caddisfly mean that they may have important and widespread implications for sediment dynamics in rivers. ii Acknowledgements Thank you to everybody who has made my PhD experience special. To my supervisors, thank you for this opportunity and for the time and experience you have invested in this project and in me as a researcher. Thank you to Steve Rice, for your enthusiasm which has kept me motivated, your expert guidance, and your dedication to puzzling over the challenges of my PhD. Thank you to Paul Wood, for your humour and care during the stressful times, going above and beyond and offering the practical advice that kept the thesis on track (well nearly!). Thank you to Matt Johnson, for sparking my initial interest in zoogeomorphology and for the help and support which you have provided, during my undergraduate and postgraduate research. Thanks also go to everyone at Loughborough Geography who have made the experience so rewarding. Particular thanks to those who have solved my (many) obscure research obstacles. To Richard Harland who solved most of them, and to Rebecca McKenzie, Daniel Gschwentner and Bailey Stickings for their incredible support with laboratory work. Thank you also to Davide Vettori for lending your flume and hydraulics expertise. Thank you to NERC CENTA for providing the funding for this project and to my CENTA cohort, a fantastic group of fellow PhD students. A huge thank you also to my PhD colleagues. From day one, sitting in the pub at 3 pm because we didn’t know what we supposed to be doing, to today, you have been there for me. Special thanks go to Harry Sanders, for the crazy escapades and injecting into the PhD experience so much enthusiasm. I will never forget eating spaghetti hoops using only a cable tie, whilst sat in the boot of a departmental car in a Scottish layby. Thanks to Ellen Goddard for your support, for the fun times at King Edward Rd. and for help with statistics. Thanks to Keechy Akkerman for the climbing, cats and whisky. Thank you also to a host of other people who have helped with fieldwork or laboratory work; Beth Worley, Ciara Dwyer, Maud van Soest, Tom Stanton, and everyone else who has been an important part of the last 4 years. To my Mum and Dad, thank you for the support over my PhD years and for my initial excitement for the natural environment. Without you patiently waiting for 3-year-old me to stomp through puddles or inspect beetles, I might not have an interest in wildlife and rivers and might have a ‘proper job’ by now! Last, a special thank you to my partner, Hazel Wilson, who has been my rock and inspiration throughout the PhD, here’s to many more adventures! iii Table of contents Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Table of contents iv List of tables vii List of figures viii Introduction 1 1.1 Research context 1 1.2 Fluvial zoogeomorphology 3 1.3 Invertebrate zoogeomorphology 6 1.3.1 Terrestrial 6 1.3.2 Marine 7 1.3.3 Sediment destabilisation in freshwater habitats: bioturbation and bioerosion 8 1.3.4 Sediment stabilisation in freshwater habitats: bioconstruction and bioprotection 10 1.4 Caddisfly biology and case-building behaviour 12 1.4.1 Caddisfly diversity and life history 12 1.4.2 Caddisfly architecture and bioconstruction 14 1.5 Aim and objectives 17 1.6 Justification of aim and objectives 17 1.7 Thesis structure 20 Chapter 2. A spatial quantification of sediment use by the case building caddisfly community 23 2.1 Introduction 24 2.2 Methods 26 2.2.1 Field sampling 26 2.2.2 Laboratory analysis 27 2.3 Data Analysis 28 2.3.1 Sediment use by individual taxa 28 2.3.2 Sediment use by the whole caddisfly community in a Surber sample 28 2.3.3 Spatial variability in sediment use by the caddisfly community 29 2.3.4 Is caddisfly abundance a control on the mass of sediment used? 29 2.3.5 Relation between sediment availability and sediment use 30 2.4 Results 30 2.4.1 Sediment use by individual caddisfly taxa 30 2.4.2 Sediment use by the whole caddisfly community 30 2.4.3 Spatial variability in community sediment use 36 2.4.4 Relation between abundance and sediment use 36 2.4.5 Relation between sediment availability and sediment use 37 2.5 Discussion 40 2.5.1 Sediment use by individual taxa and the case-building caddisfly community 40 2.5.2 Sediment use by key taxa and potential zoogeomorphological importance 40 2.5.3 Spatial variability in community sediment use and the distribution of case-building caddisfly taxa 41 2.5.4 Sediment use in relation to the abundance of taxa and availability of sediment 42 2.5.5 Methodological discussion 43 2.6 Summary 44 iv Chapter 3. The effect of caddisfly case construction and case design on the entrainment of incorporated sediment. 47 3.1 Introduction 47 3.1.1 Controls on sediment transport 47 3.1.2 Entrainment of caddisfly and the role of the case 48 3.2 Methods 50 3.2.1 Selection of species 50 3.2.2 Flume setup 51 3.2.3 Flume procedure 53 3.3 Data Analysis 55 3.3.1 Hydraulic stages 55 3.3.2 Entrainment 57 3.3.3 Caddisfly case design 58 3.4 Results 61 3.4.1 Entrainment of cases versus constituent sediment 61 3.4.2 Differences in case entrainment between species 63 3.4.3 Differences in constituent sediment entrainment between species 63 3.4.4 The role of case shape for case entrainment 66 3.5 Discussion 67 3.5.1 Transport of caddisfly cases versus sediment (Question 1) 69 3.5.2 Entrainment of loose sediment 70 3.5.3 Movement of cases, role of mass and shape (Question 2) 70 3.5.4 Geomorphological implications of caddisfly case construction 71 3.6 Summary 72 Chapter 4. Vertical sand displacement by Glossosomatidae Agapetus fuscipes larvae 75 4.1 Introduction 75 4.1.1 Sand transport in armoured gravel-bed rivers 75 4.1.2 Context of this Chapter 78 4.2 Methods 79 4.2.1 Flume setup 79 4.2.2 Sediment tray setup 80 4.2.3 Experimental procedure 82 4.2.4 Caddisfly and case analysis 83 4.2.5 Data analysis 84 4.3 Results 85 4.4 Discussion 91 4.4.1 Vertical displacement of sand by Agapetus fuscipes larvae 91 4.4.2 Influence of grain protrusion on sand displacement 92 4.4.3 Influence of flow velocity on sand displacement 93 4.4.4 Combined influence of gravel protrusion and high flow velocity on larvae positioning 93 4.4.5 Zoogeomorphic effects of sand displacement 94 4.5 Summary 96 v Chapter 5. The relative contributions of hydraulics and case-building caddisfly to bedload transport in a gravel-bed stream 98 5.1 Introduction 98 5.2 Methods 100 5.2.1 Field site 100 5.2.2 Pit trap design and deployment 100 5.2.3
Recommended publications
  • Nurita Y Amiguitos
    Graellsia, 60(1): 41-69 (2004) TRICHOPTERA (INSECTA) COLLECTED IN MEDITERRANEAN RIVER BASINS IN THE IBERIAN PENINSULA: TAXONOMIC REMARKS AND NOTES ON ECOLOGY N. Bonada*, C. Zamora-Muñoz**, M. Rieradevall* and N. Prat * ABSTRACT As a result of the GUADALMED project, which was performed in Iberian Mediterranean basins, together with samples taken by the junior author in the area, we collected numerous cad- disfly larvae, pupae and adults. Some larvae were also reared in the lab to obtain adults and allow proper identification. A total of 90 species were identified, which accounts for more than a fourth of the species known in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Here we confirm the presence of doubtful species in the Iberian Peninsula (Glyphotaelius pellucidus) and we expand the distribution range of others (Lype reducta, Micrasema minimum, Limnephilus gua- darramicus, Sericostoma pyrenaicum). Moreover, because of the unconformity of morphologi- cal larval characteristics with present taxonomical keys (Mesophylax aspersus) or lack of larvae descriptions (Allogamus mortoni, Stenophylax espanioli), here we include some relevant taxo- nomical aspects that are useful to identify larvae. A brief description of the larva of a possible new species of Hydropsyche (from now on H. gr. instabilis) is also given. Key words: Trichoptera, Mediterranean rivers, Iberian Peninsula, Faunistics, Taxonomy, Ecology. RESUMEN Los tricópteros (Insecta) recolectados en las cuencas mediterráneas españolas: notas taxonómicas y requerimientos ecológicos Como resultado de los estudios realizados en el proyecto GUADALMED en las cuencas de los ríos mediterráneos peninsulares y otros muestreos realizados por la primera autora del tra- bajo se han recolectado numerosas larvas, pupas y adultos de tricópteros.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Fact Sheet for Homoplectra Schuhi
    SPECIES FACT SHEET Common Name: Schuh’s Homoplectran Caddisfly Scientific Name: Homoplectra schuhi Denning 1965 Phylum: Mandibulata Class: Insecta Order: Trichoptera Suborder: Annulipalpia Family: Hydropsychidae Subfamily: Diplectroninae Conservation Status Global Status (2005): G3Q – Vulnerable, but taxonomic questions persist (last reviewed 25 Mar 2005) National Status (United States): N3 - Vulnerable (23 Feb 2005) State Status (Oregon): S3 - Vulnerable (NatureServe 2015) Oregon Biodiversity Information Center: List 3 IUCN Red List: NE – Not evaluated Taxonomic Note This species has been given a global status of G3Q due to the limited number of specimens that have been reviewed to date, and the variability of diagnostic characteristics (NatureServe 2015). This genus is in need of additional collecting and taxonomic review, which may lead to synonymization with older described species (Wisseman 2015, Ruiter 2015). For example, specimens identified as H. luchia Denning 1966 may in fact be synonyms of H. schuhi (Ruiter 2015). Technical Description A microscope is required to identify Homoplectra schuhi, as identifications are based on genitalia anatomy. The advice of a Trichoptera expert is suggested. See Denning (1965) for lateral view drawings of the male and female genitalia. Adult: The adults of this species are small, moth-like insects in the caddisfly family Hydropsychidae. Homoplectra males are recognized by the complexity of the phallic apparatus, which can be complicated by very strong development of several sclerotized branches (Schmid 1998). Holotype male: Length 6 mm. General color of head, thorax and abdomen dark brown, wings tan with no pattern, legs and antennae varying shades of brownish. Pubescence of head, thorax and legs aureous. Fifth sternite with a dorsal filament enlarged distally and curved dorso-caudad.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    Ecologica Montenegrina 44: 69-95 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.44.10 Biodiversity, DNA barcoding data and ecological traits of caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera) in the catchment area of the Mediterranean karst River Cetina (Croatia) IVAN VUČKOVIĆ1*, MLADEN KUČINIĆ2**, ANĐELA ĆUKUŠIĆ3, MARIJANA VUKOVIĆ4, RENATA ĆUK5, SVJETLANA STANIĆ-KOŠTROMAN6, DARKO CERJANEC7 & MLADEN PLANTAK1 1Elektroprojekt d.d., Civil and Architectural Engineering Department, Section of Ecology, Alexandera von Humboldta 4, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mails:[email protected]; [email protected] 2Department of Biology (Laboratory for Entomology), Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development, Radnička cesta 80/7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] 4Croatian Natural History Museum, Demetrova 1, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] 5Hrvatske vode, Central Water Management Laboratory, Ulica grada Vukovara 220, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail:[email protected] 6Faculty of Science and Education, University of Mostar, Matice hrvatske bb, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina. E-mail: [email protected] 7Primary School Barilović, Barilović 96, 47252 Barilović and Primary School Netretić, Netretić 1, 47271 E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author: [email protected] **Equally contributing author Received 2 June 2021 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 19 July 2021 │ Published online 2 August 2021. Abstract The environmental and faunistic research conducted included defining the composition and distribution of caddisflies collected using ultraviolet (UV) light trap at 11 stations along the Cetina River, from the spring to the mouth, and also along its tributaries the Ruda River and the Grab River with two sampling stations each, and the Rumin River with one station.
    [Show full text]
  • (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae: Protoptilinae) from Brazil
    A new species of Protoptila Banks (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae: Protoptilinae) from Brazil Allan Paulo Moreira SANTOS1, Jorge Luiz NESSIMIAN2 ABSTRACT A new species of Protoptila Banks (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae: Protoptilinae) – P. longispinata sp. nov. – is described and illustrated from specimens collected in Amazon region, Amazonas and Pará states, Brazil. KEY WORDS: Amazon basin, Protoptila longispinata sp. nov., Neotropical Region, taxonomy. Uma nova espécie de Protoptila Banks (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae: Protoptilinae) do Brasil RESUMO Uma nova espécie de Protoptila Banks (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae: Protoptilinae) – P. longispinata sp. nov. – é descrita e ilustrada a partir de espécimes coletados na Região Amazônica, estados do Amazonas e do Pará, Brasil. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: bacia Amazônica, Protoptila longispinata sp. nov., Região Neotropical, taxonomia. 1 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. E-mail: [email protected] 723 VOL. 39(3) 2009: 723 - 726 A new species of Protoptila Banks (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae: Protoptilinae) from Brazil INTRODUCTION internal area slightly expanded. Forewings covered by long The genus Protoptila currently has 93 described species dark brown setae, and with a light transverse bar at midlength; widespread throughout the Americas, but with most species forks I, II, and III present; discoidal cell closed (Figure 1). occurring in the Neotropics (Robertson & Holzenthal, 2008). Hind wing with forks II and III present (Figure 2); nygma This is the largest genus of the subfamily Protoptilinae, and thyridium inconspicuous in fore- and hind wings. Legs represented in Brazil by 12 species, ten of which were described yellowish brown, with short dark setae. Abdominal segments from Amazon basin, nine occurring in Amazonas State: P.
    [Show full text]
  • (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) in Western North America By
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Robert W. Wisseman for the degree of Master ofScience in Entomology presented on August 6, 1987 Title: Biology and Distribution of the Dicosmoecinae (Trichoptera: Limnsphilidae) in Western North America Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: N. H. Anderson Literature and museum records have been reviewed to provide a summary on the distribution, habitat associations and biology of six western North American Dicosmoecinae genera and the single eastern North American genus, Ironoquia. Results of this survey are presented and discussed for Allocosmoecus,Amphicosmoecus and Ecclisomvia. Field studies were conducted in western Oregon on the life-histories of four species, Dicosmoecusatripes, D. failvipes, Onocosmoecus unicolor andEcclisocosmoecus scvlla. Although there are similarities between generain the general habitat requirements, the differences or variability is such that we cannot generalize to a "typical" dicosmoecine life-history strategy. A common thread for the subfamily is the association with cool, montane streams. However, within this stream category habitat associations range from semi-aquatic, through first-order specialists, to river inhabitants. In feeding habits most species are omnivorous, but they range from being primarilydetritivorous to algal grazers. The seasonal occurrence of the various life stages and voltinism patterns are also variable. Larvae show inter- and intraspecificsegregation in the utilization of food resources and microhabitatsin streams. Larval life-history patterns appear to be closely linked to seasonal regimes in stream discharge. A functional role for the various types of case architecture seen between and within species is examined. Manipulation of case architecture appears to enable efficient utilization of a changing seasonal pattern of microhabitats and food resources.
    [Show full text]
  • User Manual Beta Sdam Aw.Pdf
    User Manual for a Beta Streamflow Duration Assessment Method for the Arid West of the United States Version 1.0 March 1, 2021 Prepared by Raphael Mazor1, Brian Topping2, Tracie-Lynn Nadeau2,3, Ken M. Fritz4, Julia Kelso5, Rachel Harrington6, Whitney Beck2, Kenneth McCune1, Heili Lowman1, Aaron Allen7, Robert Leidy8, James T. Robb9, and Gabrielle C. L. David10. 1 Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA 2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. Washington, D.C. 3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Region 10. Portland, OR 4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Research and Development. Cincinnati, OH 5 Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education (ORISE) Fellow at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. Washington, D.C. 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Region 8. Denver, CO 7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers–South Pacific Division. Los Angeles, CA 8 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Region 9. San Francisco, CA. 9 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – South Pacific Division. Sacramento, CA 10 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Hanover, NH. Suggested citation: Mazor, R.D., Topping, B., Nadeau, T.-L., Fritz, K.M., Kelso, J., Harrington, R., Beck, W., McCune, K., Lowman, H., Allen, A., Leidy, R., Robb, J.T., and David, G.C.L. 2021. User Manuel for a Beta Streamflow Duration Assessment Method for the Arid West of the United States. Version 1.0. Document No. EPA- 800-5-21001 Cover images The top row shows the biological indicators included in the streamflow duration assessment method for the Arid West: number of hydrophytic plant species, such as seep monkey flowers; abundance of aquatic invertebrates, such as black fly larvae; evidence of mayfly, stonefly, and caddisfly taxa, such as a larva or pupal case of Dicosmoecus gilvipes (photo credit: California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Aquatic Bioassessment Lab); and algal cover on the streambed.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Trade-Offs and Resource Allocation in Caddis Flies
    Stevens, David J. (2000) Developmental trade-offs and resource allocation in caddis flies. PhD thesis http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3764/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Developmental Trade-Offs and Resource Allocation In Caddis Flies. David J. Stevens A thesis submitted for the degree ofDoctor ofPhilosophy to the Faculty of Science, University ofGlasgow. September 2000 Declaration I declare that the work presented in this thesis has been completed by myselfunless otherwise acknowledged in the text. No part ofthis work has been presented for any other qualification. David Stevens September 2000 Acknowledgements I could not have hoped for two better supervisors than Pat Monaghan and Mike Hansell. I wish to thank them not just for giving me my chance in the first place, but for giving me the freedom within the project to explore many avenues ofinvestigation. Most ofthese proved fruitful, ifonly to teach me not to do it again. The support, encouragement and advice they gave were ofimmeasurable help over the course ofthe project.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of the Zoobenthos of the Tsraudon River Basin (The Terek River Basin)
    E3S Web of Conferences 169, 03006 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016903006 APEEM 2020 The study of the zoobenthos of the Tsraudon river basin (the Terek river basin) Ia E. Dzhioeva*, Susanna K. Cherchesova , Oleg A. Navatorov, and Sofia F. Lamarton North Ossetian state University named after K.L. Khetagurov, Vladikavkaz, Russia Abstract. The paper presents data on the species composition and distribution of zoobenthos in the Tsraudon river basin, obtained during the 2017-2019 research. In total, 4 classes of invertebrates (Gastropoda, Crustacea, Hydracarina, Insecta) are found in the benthic structure. The class Insecta has the greatest species diversity. All types of insects in our collections are represented by lithophilic, oligosaprobic fauna. Significant differences in the composition of the fauna of the Tsraudon river creeks and tributary streams have been identified. 7 families of the order Trichoptera are registered in streams, and 4 families in the river. It is established that the streamlets of the family Hydroptilidae do not occur in streams, the distribution boundary of the streamlets of Hydropsyche angustipennis (Hydropsychidae) is concentrated in the mountain-forest zone. The hydrological features of the studied watercourses are also revealed. 1 Introduction The biocenoses of flowing reservoirs of the North Caucasus, and especially small rivers, remain insufficiently explored today; particularly, there is no information about the systematic composition, biology and ecology of amphibiotic insects (mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies and dipterous) of the studied basin. Amphibiotic insects are an essential link in the food chain of our reservoirs and at the same time can be attributed to reliable indicators of water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Nabs 2004 Final
    CURRENT AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON BENTHIC BIOLOGY 2004 Published August, 2005 North American Benthological Society 2 FOREWORD “Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic Biology” is published annu- ally for the members of the North American Benthological Society, and summarizes titles of articles published during the previous year. Pertinent titles prior to that year are also included if they have not been cited in previous reviews. I wish to thank each of the members of the NABS Literature Review Committee for providing bibliographic information for the 2004 NABS BIBLIOGRAPHY. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Wohlgemuth, INHS Librarian, and library assis- tants Anna FitzSimmons, Jessica Beverly, and Elizabeth Day, for their assistance in putting the 2004 bibliography together. Membership in the North American Benthological Society may be obtained by contacting Ms. Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, Uni- versity of Minnesota, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811. Phone: 218/720-4251. email:[email protected]. Dr. Donald W. Webb, Editor NABS Bibliography Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-6846 e-mail: [email protected] 3 CONTENTS PERIPHYTON: Christine L. Weilhoefer, Environmental Science and Resources, Portland State University, Portland, O97207.................................5 ANNELIDA (Oligochaeta, etc.): Mark J. Wetzel, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820.................................................................................................................6 ANNELIDA (Hirudinea): Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Re- search Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268- 0001 and William E.
    [Show full text]
  • Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in the Carpathians
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(1): 106–113, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.006 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Spatial ecology of Hydropsyche incognita (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in the Carpathians MÃLINA PÎRVU 1, 2, CLAUDIA ZAHARIA3, ALINA SATMARI 4 and LUCIAN PÂRVULESCU 1 1 Department of Biology-Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology, Geography, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Department of Systems Ecology and Sustainability, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania 3 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Department of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology, Geography, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Trichoptera, Hydropsychidae, Hydropsyche incognita, ecological preferences, spatial analysis, species distribution modelling Abstract. Caddisflies are often used in studies on freshwater ecosystem ecology because of their aquatic-dependent larvae. The pre- sent study addresses the ecological affinities of larvae of Hydropsyche incognita in terms of the pattern of distribution of this species in the Romanian Carpathians using a boosted regression trees (BRT) model. A population cluster located in the western Romanian Carpathians was identified by the spatial analysis. The statistical model revealed that this species prefers a neutral to low-alkaline pH, high levels of dissolved oxygen, low conductivity, fast flowing water, moderate sized rivers at an altitude below 600 m a.s.l. and low concentrations of organic pollutants. An eastward decrease in the frequency of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriotypus Armatus Curtis, 1832, a Parasitoid of Silo Pallipes Fabricius, 1781: the first Record for the Balkan Peninsula K
    Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (2014) 414, 05 http://www.kmae-journal.org c ONEMA, 2014 DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2014016 Agriotypus armatus Curtis, 1832, a parasitoid of Silo pallipes Fabricius, 1781: the first record for the Balkan Peninsula K. Bjelanovic´ (1),I.Živic´ (1),,A.Petrovic´ (1), J. Djordjevic´ (2),Z.Markovic´ (3), V. Ž ik ic´ (4) Received January 12, 2014 Revised March 25, 2014 Accepted March 27, 2014 ABSTRACT Key-words: Among the diverse order of Hymenoptera, aquatic species are of special Agriotypus, interest. During macrozoobenthos sampling in the rivers of Serbia in 2003 parasitoid, and during the period 2011−2012, pupae of Silo pallipes Fabricius, 1781 Serbia, were recorded which were parasitized by an ichneumonid wasp Agrioty- distribution, pus armatus Curtis, 1832, this being the first record of it for the Balkan ecological Peninsula. A total of 217 A. armatus specimens were collected at 29 local- parameters ities situated along 16 watercourses of Serbia. All four parasitoid stages (egg, larva, pupa and resting adult) were recorded. The identity of the par- asitoid was confirmed using standard molecular methods. This study also focuses on the ecology of the parasitoid and its host. The widespread dis- tribution of A. armatus in Europe suggests the presence of this species in other Balkan countries, but this has not yet been confirmed due to a lack of surveys and/or the constantly increasing pollution of freshwaters. RÉSUMÉ Agriotypus armatus Curtis 1832, un parasitoïde de Silo pallipes Fabricius, 1781 : premier enregistrement dans la péninsule des Balkans Mots-clés : Parmi l’ordre diversifié des hyménoptères, les espèces aquatiques sont d’un inté- Agriotypus, rêt particulier.
    [Show full text]