DOCSLIB.ORG

Nabs 2004 Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nabs 2004 Final CURRENT AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON BENTHIC BIOLOGY 2004 Published August, 2005 North American Benthological Society 2 FOREWORD “Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic Biology” is published annu- ally for the members of the North American Benthological Society, and summarizes titles of articles published during the previous year. Pertinent titles prior to that year are also included if they have not been cited in previous reviews. I wish to thank each of the members of the NABS Literature Review Committee for providing bibliographic information for the 2004 NABS BIBLIOGRAPHY. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Wohlgemuth, INHS Librarian, and library assis- tants Anna FitzSimmons, Jessica Beverly, and Elizabeth Day, for their assistance in putting the 2004 bibliography together. Membership in the North American Benthological Society may be obtained by contacting Ms. Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, Uni- versity of Minnesota, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811. Phone: 218/720-4251. email:[email protected]. Dr. Donald W. Webb, Editor NABS Bibliography Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-6846 e-mail: [email protected] 3 CONTENTS PERIPHYTON: Christine L. Weilhoefer, Environmental Science and Resources, Portland State University, Portland, O97207.................................5 ANNELIDA (Oligochaeta, etc.): Mark J. Wetzel, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820.................................................................................................................6 ANNELIDA (Hirudinea): Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Re- search Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268- 0001 and William E. Moser, Section of Invertebrate Zoology, Department of Systematic Biology, P.O. Box 37012, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th & Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. 20013-7012......................................................................................................15 PLECOPTERA: Stanley W. Szczytko, College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI 54481 and Bill P. Stark, Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi College, Clinton, MS 39058...........................................................................................16 EPHEMEROPTERA: Peter M. Grant, Department of Biological Sciences, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Weatherford, OK 73096...............21 ODONATA: Kenneth J. Tennessen, 1949 Hickory Ave.Florence, AL 35630.......29 TRICHOPTERA: Andrew P. Nimmo, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. T6G 2E3...........................................34 MEGALOPTERA: Parley V. Winger, USGS-Pautuxent Wildlife Research Center Athens, Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602............................................................................................44 AQUATIC COLEOPTERA: Sharon Knight Jasper, School of Biological Sciences, Section of Integrative Biology, 141 Patterson Labs, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1064....................................................45 DIPTERA: Ceratopogonidae: Donald W. Webb, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, lL 61820................................................................................................................50 DIPTERA: Chironomidae: Donald W. Webb, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, lL 61820................................................................................................................52 DIPTERA: Other: Ben A. Foote, Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242...........................................................60 MOLLUSCA: Kevin S. Cummings, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, 61820 .......................62 ACARINA: Thomas W. Simmons, and Preston R. Smith, Department of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 114 Weyandt Hall, Indiana, PA 15705................................................................................................................75 4 GENERAL AQUATIC ECOLOGY: Barry N. Brown, Science Librarian & Access Services Coordinator, Mansfield Library, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812........................................................................................78 MACROINVERTEBRATE TOXICOLOGY: Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Res. Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268-0001.............................................................................88 METHODS AND TECHNIQUES: Paul K. Sibley, Centre for Toxicology, Bovey Building, Gordon Street, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1...........................................................................................89 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS: Paul M. Kotila, Dean of Undergraduate Studies, Franklin Pierce College, 20 College Rd.,Rindge, NH 03461-0060.............................................................................................106 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY: Matthew E. Herbert, Department of Biology, Brooks 217, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48189.............110 5 Periphyton Gao, X.; Olapade, O.A.; Kershner, M.W.; Leff, L.G. 2004. Algal- Periphyton bacterial co-variation in streams: A cross-stream comparison. Christine L. Weilhofer Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie 159: 253-261. Gausch, H.; Navarro, E.; Serra, A.; Sabater, S. 2004. Phosphate Ambrose, H.E.; Wilzbach, M.A.; Cummins, K.W. 2004. Periphyton limitation influences the sensitivity to copper in periphytic algae. response to increased light and salmon carcass introduction in Freshwater Biology 49: 463-473. northern California streams. Journal of the North American Gevrey, M.; Rimet, F.; Park, Y.S.; Giraudel, J.; Ector, L.; Lek, S. 2004. Benthological Society 23: 701-712. Water quality assessment using diatom assemblages and advanced Armitage, A.R.; Fong, P. 2004. Upward cascading effects of nutrients: modelling techniques. Freshwater Biology 49: 208-220. shifts in a benthic microalgal community and a negative herbivore Gjerloev, C.; Richardson, J.S. 2004. Patchy resources in a response. Oecologia 139: 560-567. heterogeneous environment: effects of leaf litter and forest cover Asai, K.; Watanabe, T. 2004. Relationship between water quality and on colonisation patterns of invertebrates in a British Columbian diversity indices of freshwater epilithic diatom assemblages. Pages stream. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie 161: 307-327. 1-10. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth International Diatom Guegen, C.; Gilbin, R.; Pardos, M.; Dominik, J. 2004. Water toxicity Symposium. and metal contamination assessment of a polluted river: the Upper Barquin, J.; Death, R.G. 2004. Patterns of invertebrate diversity in Vistula River (Poland). Applied Geochemistry 19: 153-162. streams and freshwater springs in Northern Spain. Archiv fuer Gutowski, A.; Foerster, J.; Schaumburg, J. 2004. The use of benthic Hydrobiologie 161: 329-349. algae, excluding diatoms and Charales, for the assessment of the Baxter, C.V.; Fausch, K.D.; Murakami, M.; Chapman, P.L. 2004. Fish ecological status of running fresh waters: a case history from invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting Germany. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 33: 3-15. reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology 85: 2656-2663. Haakanson, L.; Boulion, V.V. 2004. Empirical and dynamical models Belanger, S.E.; Lee, D.M.; Bowling, J.W.; Leblanc, E.M. 2004. of production and biomass of benthic algae in lakes. Hydrobiologia Responses of periphyton and invertebrates to a tetradecyl- 522: 75-97. pentadecyl sulfate mixture in stream mesocosms. Environmental Haakanson, L.; Boulion, V.V. 2004. Modelling Production and Toxicology and Chemistry 23: 2202-2213. Biomasses of Prey and Predatory Fish in Lakes. Hydrobiologia Berger, E.A.; Weaver, J.E. 2004. The influence of crevice size on the 511: 125-150. protection of epilithic algae from grazers. Freshwater Biology 49: Hamsher, S.E.; Verb, R.G.; Vis, M.L. 2004. Analysis of acid mine 1014-1025. drainage impacted streams using a periphyton index. Journal of Bernhardt, E.S.; Likens, G.E. 2004. Controls on periphyton biomass Freshwater Ecology 19: 313. in heterotrophic streams. Freshwater Biology 49: 14-27. Havens, K.E.; Sharfstein, B.; Rodusky, A.J.; East, T.L. 2004. Brooks, B.W.; Stanley, J.K.; White, J.C.; Turner, P.K.; Wu, K.B.; La Phosphorus accumulation in the littoral zone of a subtropical lake. Point, T.W. 2004. Laboratory and field responses to cadmium: an Hydrobiologia 517: 15-24. experimental study in effluent-dominated stream mesocosms. Hillebrand, H.; Cardinale, B.J. 2004. Consumer effects decline with Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23: 1057-1064. prey diversity. Ecology Letters 7: 192-201. Cavanaugh, J.C.; Haro, R.J.; Jones, S.N. 2004. Conspecific cases as Hirst, H.; Chaud, F.; Delabie, C.; Juettner, I.; Ormerod, S.J. 2004. alternative grazing surfaces for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Diversity of Insects Visiting Flowers of Saw Palmetto (Arecaceae)
    Deyrup & Deyrup: Insect Visitors of Saw Palmetto Flowers 711 THE DIVERSITY OF INSECTS VISITING FLOWERS OF SAW PALMETTO (ARECACEAE) MARK DEYRUP1,* AND LEIF DEYRUP2 1Archbold Biological Station, 123 Main Drive, Venus, FL 33960 2Univ. of the Cumberlands, Williamsburg, KY 40769 *Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A survey of insect visitors on flowers ofSerenoa repens (saw palmetto) at a Florida site, the Archbold Biological Station, showed how nectar and pollen resources of a plant species can contribute to taxonomic diversity and ecological complexity. A list of 311 species of flower visitors was dominated by Hymenoptera (121 spp.), Diptera (117 spp.), and Coleoptera (52 spp.). Of 228 species whose diets are known, 158 are predators, 47 are phytophagous, and 44 are decomposers. Many species that visited S. repens flowers also visited flowers of other species at the Archbold Biological Station. The total number of known insect-flower relation- ships that include S. repens is 2,029. There is no evidence of oligolectic species that are de- pendent on saw palmetto flowers. This study further emphasizes the ecological importance and conservation value of S. repens. Key Words: pollination, flower visitor webs, pollinator diversity, floral resources, saw pal- metto, Serenoa repens RESUMEN Un estudio sobre los insectos que visitan las flores de Serenoa repens (palma enana ameri- cana o palmito de sierra) en un sitio de la Florida, la Estación Biológica Archbold, mostró cómo los recursos de néctar y polen de una especie vegetal puede contribuir a la diversidad taxonómica y complejidad ecológica. Una lista de 311 especies de visitantes de flores fue dominada por los Hymenóptera (121 spp.), Diptera (117 spp.) y Coleoptera (52 spp.).
    [Show full text]
  • CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research
    CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research No. 25 ISSN 0172-1941 (printed) 1891-5426 (online) November 2012 CONTENTS Editorial: Inventories - What are they good for? 3 Dr. William P. Coffman: Celebrating 50 years of research on Chironomidae 4 Dear Sepp! 9 Dr. Marta Margreiter-Kownacka 14 Current Research Sharma, S. et al. Chironomidae (Diptera) in the Himalayan Lakes - A study of sub- fossil assemblages in the sediments of two high altitude lakes from Nepal 15 Krosch, M. et al. Non-destructive DNA extraction from Chironomidae, including fragile pupal exuviae, extends analysable collections and enhances vouchering 22 Martin, J. Kiefferulus barbitarsis (Kieffer, 1911) and Kiefferulus tainanus (Kieffer, 1912) are distinct species 28 Short Communications An easy to make and simple designed rearing apparatus for Chironomidae 33 Some proposed emendations to larval morphology terminology 35 Chironomids in Quaternary permafrost deposits in the Siberian Arctic 39 New books, resources and announcements 43 Finnish Chironomidae 47 Chironomini indet. (Paratendipes?) from La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Photo by Carlos de la Rosa. CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research Editors Torbjørn EKREM, Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Peter H. LANGTON, 16, Irish Society Court, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1GX The CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research is devoted to all aspects of chironomid research and aims to be an updated news bulletin for the Chironomidae research community. The newsletter is published yearly in October/November, is open access, and can be downloaded free from this website: http:// www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/chironomus. Publisher is the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Chironomus Frontpage No 28
    CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research No. 30 ISSN 2387-5372 December 2017 CONTENTS Editorial Anderson, A.M. Keep the fuel burning 2 Current Research Epler, J. An annotated preliminary list of the Chironomidae of Zurqui 4 Martin, J. Chironomus strenzkei is a junior synonym of C. stratipennis 19 Andersen, T. et al. Two new Neo- tropical Chironominae genera 26 Kuper, J. Life cycle of natural populations of Metriocnemus (Inermipupa) carmencitabertarum in The Netherlands: indications for a southern origin 55 Lin, X., Wang, X. A redescription of Zavrelia bragremia 67 Short Communications Baranov, V., Nekhaev, I. Impact of the bird-manure caused eutrophication on the abundance and diversity of chironomid larvae in lakes of the Bolshoy Aynov Island 72 Namayandeh, A., Beresford, D.V. New range extensions for the Canadian Chironomidae fauna from two urban streams 76 News Liu, W. et al. The 2nd Chinese Symposium on Chironomidae 81 In memoriam Michailova, P., et al. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friedrich Wülker 82 Unidentified male, perhaps of the Chironomus decorus group? Photo taken in the Madrona Marsh Preserve, California, USA. Photo: Emile Fiesler. CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research Editors Alyssa M. ANDERSON, Department of Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Mathematics, Northern State University, Aberdeen, South Dakota, USA. Torbjørn EKREM, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Peter H. LANGTON, 16, Irish Society Court, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1GX. The CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research is devoted to all aspects of chironomid research and serves as an up-to-date research journal and news bulletin for the Chironomidae research community.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Diptera As Indicators of Pollution in a Midwestern Stream
    AQUATIC DIPTERA AS INDICATORS OF POLLUTION IN A MIDWESTERN STREAM GEORGE H. PAINE, JR. AND ARDEN R. GAUFIN Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, Public Health Service, Cincinnati, Ohio A knowledge of the ecological requirements of aquatic organisms, especially the benthic forms, is of outstanding importance to biologists in determining the degree and extent of pollution in streams. An examination of bottom fauna serves to indicate conditions not only at the time of examination but also over considerable periods in the past. Those organisms having an annual life cycle will by their presence or absence indicate any unusual occurrence which took place during several previous months. Satisfactory use of aquatic organisms as indicators of pollution and self-purification of water is dependent upon a know- ledge of the normal habitats of these organisms and their sensitivity to varying environmental factors such as pollution. Among the aquatic invertebrates, insects such as the mayflies, stoneflies, and caddis flies are primarily restricted to clean water conditions. By comparison, forms such as the pulmonate snails, Tubificid worms, and certain species of leeches can more often be found under conditions where high organic and/or low oxygen content exist. Still other groups such as the Diptera, or true flies, are repre- sented by forms which may be found in all types of stream habitats from the cleanest situation to the most polluted water. Because aquatic Diptera are to be found in many different ecological niches in both clean and polluted water and many species are highly selective in their choice of habitat, they constitute one of the most important groups of indicator organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) in Central Europe
    Shortened web version University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Faculty of Science Ecology of Veliidae and Mesoveliidae (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) in Central Europe RNDr. Tomáš Ditrich Ph.D. Thesis Supervisor: Prof. RNDr. Miroslav Papáček, CSc. University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Education České Budějovice 2010 Shortened web version Ditrich, T., 2010: Ecology of Veliidae and Mesoveliidae (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) in Central Europe. Ph.D. Thesis, in English. – 85 p., Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Annotation Ecology of Veliidae and Mesoveliidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) was studied in selected European species. The research of these non-gerrid semiaquatic bugs was especially focused on voltinism, overwintering with physiological consequences and wing polymorphism with dispersal pattern. Hypotheses based on data from field surveys were tested by laboratory, mesocosm and field experiments. New data on life history traits and their ecophysiological consequences are discussed in seven original research papers (four papers published in peer-reviewed journals, one paper accepted to publication, one submitted paper and one communication in a conference proceedings), creating core of this thesis. Keywords Insects, semiaquatic bugs, life history, overwintering, voltinism, dispersion, wing polymorphism. Financial support This thesis was mainly supported by grant of The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic No. MSM 6007665801, partially by grant of the Grant Agency of the University of South Bohemia No. GAJU 6/2007/P-PřF, by The Research Council of Norway: The YGGDRASIL mobility program No. 195759/V11 and by Czech Science Foundation grant No. 206/07/0269. Shortened web version Declaration I hereby declare that I worked out this Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the External Morphology and Functions of Labial Tip Sensilla in Semiaquatic Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 111(2): 275–297, 2014 doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.033 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) A comparison of the external morphology and functions of labial tip sensilla in semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) 1 2 JOLANTA BROŻeK and HERBERT ZeTTeL 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, PL 40-007 Katowice, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum, entomological Department, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Heteroptera, Gerromorpha, labial tip sensilla, pattern, morphology, function, apomorphic characters Abstract. The present study provides new data on the morphology and distribution of the labial tip sensilla of 41 species of 20 gerro- morphan (sub)families (Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) obtained using a scanning electron microscope. There are eleven morphologically distinct types of sensilla on the tip of the labium: four types of basiconic uniporous sensilla, two types of plate sensilla, one type of peg uniporous sensilla, peg-in-pit sensilla, dome-shaped sensilla, placoid multiporous sensilla and elongated placoid multiporous sub- apical sensilla. Based on their external structure, it is likely that these sensilla are thermo-hygrosensitive, chemosensitive and mechano- chemosensitive. There are three different designs of sensilla in the Gerromorpha: the basic design occurs in Mesoveliidae and Hebridae; the intermediate one is typical of Hydrometridae and Hermatobatidae, and the most specialized design in Macroveliidae, Veliidae and Gerridae. No new synapomorphies for Gerromorpha were identified in terms of the labial tip sensilla, multi-peg structures and shape of the labial tip, but eleven new diagnostic characters are recorded for clades currently recognized in this infraorder.
    [Show full text]
  • New Taxa Described by Günther Theischinger (Update 2016)
    New taxa described by Günther Theischinger (update 2016) Taxa, mostly of genus and species group, described as new: up to end of 2016: 41+, 729+ ODONATA, Aeshnidae Afroaeschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 229 (2011). Agyrtacantha browni Marinov & Theischinger, International Dragonfly Fund - Report 53:2 (2012). Agyrtacantha picta Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica xxx (2017). Gynacantha heros Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 41 (4): 356 (2012). Gynacantha nourlangie Theischinger & Watson, in Watson et al., The Australian Dragonflies: 41 (1991). Gynacantha nuda Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 45 (3/4): 318 (2016). Pinheyschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 232 (2011). Pinheyschna waterstoni Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 235 (2011). Zosteraeschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 241 (2011). ODONATA, Argiolestidae Argiolestes angulatus Theischinger & Richards, in Tyagi, B.K. (ed.): Odonata Biology of Dragonflies: 34 (2007). Argiolestes fornicatus Theischinger & Richards, in Tyagi, B.K. (ed.): Odonata Biology of Dragonflies: 36 (2007). Argiolestes indentatus Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 35(1): 386 (2006). Argiolestes trigonalis Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 37(2): 168 (2008). Austroargiolestes brookhousei Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 409 (1986). Austroargiolestes christine Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 394 (1986). Austroargiolestes elke Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 396 (1986). Austroargiolestes isabellae
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots of Mite New Species Discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015)
    Zootaxa 4208 (2): 101–126 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Editorial ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4208.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:47690FBF-B745-4A65-8887-AADFF1189719 Hotspots of mite new species discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015) GUANG-YUN LI1 & ZHI-QIANG ZHANG1,2 1 School of Biological Sciences, the University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2 Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland, New Zealand; corresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract A list of of type localities and depositories of new species of the mite order Sarciptiformes published in two journals (Zootaxa and Systematic & Applied Acarology) during 2013–2015 is presented in this paper, and trends and patterns of new species are summarised. The 242 new species are distributed unevenly among 50 families, with 62% of the total from the top 10 families. Geographically, these species are distributed unevenly among 39 countries. Most new species (72%) are from the top 10 countries, whereas 61% of the countries have only 1–3 new species each. Four of the top 10 countries are from Asia (Vietnam, China, India and The Philippines). Key words: Acari, Sarcoptiformes, new species, distribution, type locality, type depository Introduction This paper provides a list of the type localities and depositories of new species of the order Sarciptiformes (Acari: Acariformes) published in two journals (Zootaxa and Systematic & Applied Acarology (SAA)) during 2013–2015 and a summary of trends and patterns of these new species. It is a continuation of a previous paper (Liu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Aquatic Insect Diversity of Two Ponds Located in Cachar District, Assam, India
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2016) 40: 392-401 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1505-18 A comparative study of the aquatic insect diversity of two ponds located in Cachar District, Assam, India Arpita DALAL, Susmita GUPTA* Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India Received: 12.05.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 05.01.2016 Final Version: 07.04.2016 Abstract: Ponds play a vital role in the conservation of aquatic biodiversity at the local level apart from other lakes and rivers. A comparative study was carried out on the aquatic insect diversity of two different ponds, one in an urban area (urban pond, UP) and another in a rural area (Jalinga pond, JP). Two seasonal collections (postmonsoon and winter) were made to check the pollution status of the two ponds based on the aquatic insect community and physicochemical properties of water. Consequently, 29 species, 17 families, and 5 orders of aquatic insects from UP and 17 species, 8 families, and 3 orders from JP were recorded. Aphelonecta sp., Cloeon sp., and Micronecta sp. were the eudominant species recorded. According to the Shannon (H’) index, UP was more diverse than JP. Family level biotic indices and scores further proved the better water quality of UP than of JP. Hence, it can be said that urban ponds have an important role to play in biodiversity conservation. Key words: Aquatic insects, water quality, ponds, biodiversity, comparison 1. Introduction and predators (Resh and Rosenberg, 1984). In spite of Ponds are common features of many landscapes and often their importance as biomonitors, bioindicators, predators, contribute the bulk of regional freshwater biodiversity and biocontrol agents, conservationists are far from able (Collinson et al., 1995; Williams et al., 2004; Scheffer to list all species under threat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Zoogeography of Freshwater Ostracoda (Crustacea
    Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 54 (1): 25-50 — 1984 Amsterdam Expeditions to the West Indian Islands, Report 38. The distribution and zoogeography of freshwater Ostracoda (Crustacea) in the West Indies, with emphasis on species inhabiting wells by Nico W. Broodbakker Institute of Taxonomie Zoology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 20125, 1000 HC Amsterdam, The Netherlands Summary Résumé The distribution of Ostracoda in islands of discute freshwater the On la distribution des Ostracodes dulcicoles sur les the West Indies and part of the Venezuelan mainland is îles des Indes Occidentales et dans certaines zones de discussed. The ostracod fauna of wells and epigean Venezuela. La faune d’Ostracodes des puits et des habitats habitats Some Certaines des is compared. species, e.g. Cypretta spp. are épigés est comparée. espèces (par exemple found often in others significantly more wells, are only espèces de Cypretta) sont trouvées nettement plus souvent found in and dans des d’autres epigean habitats, e.g. Hemicypris spp. Cypris puits, (par exemples Hemicypris spp. et subglobosa. Some species are found significantly more often Cypris subglobosa) sont rencontrées seulement dans des in others to habitats il epigean habitats, e.g. Stenocypris major, seem épigés. Ensuite, y a des espèces nettement plus have and trouvées dans les habitats no preference, e.g. Physocypria affinis Cypridopsis souvent épigés (Stenocypris major tandis spp. par exemple), que d’autres (exemples: Physocypria occurrence of Ostracoda and other faunal semblent avoir de Joint groups affinis et Cypridopsis spp.) ne pas préfé- in wells is studied, especially for hadziid amphipods, which rence. are to on small crustaceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Historical Biogeography and Ecological Phylogenetics in A
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Denisia Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 0019 Autor(en)/Author(s): Damgaard Jakob Artikel/Article: Systematics, Historical Biogeography and Ecological Phylogenetics in a clade of water striders 813-822 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Systematics, Historical Biogeography and Ecological Phylogenetics in a clade of water striders1 J. DAMGAARD Abstract: I hereby review the current knowledge about systematics, historical biogeography and ecolo- gical phylogenetics in the three principal northern temperate genera of water striders Limnoporus STÅL 1868, Aquarius SCHELLENBERG 1800 and Gerris FABRICIUS 1794. Most of the discussion is based on com- parison of a recently published combined analysis tree involving four genetic markers and a morpholo- gical data set with older phylogenetic trees primarily based on manual cladistic optimization of mor- phological characters. Key words: DNA-barcodes, Gerrinae, phylogeography, simultaneous analyses. Introduction nally, water striders show great variation in mating strategies, and morphological and Water striders (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, behavioral adaptations to accomplish or Gerromorpha, Gerridae) are familiar inhab- avoid multiple mating (ANDERSEN 1994, itants of aquatic habitats throughout the 1996; ARNQVIST 1997). The striking diver- Worlds temperate, subtropical, and tropical sity in habitat selection, wing polymorphism regions comprising approximately 640 de- and mating strategies – along with the prac- scribed species in 72 genera (ANDERSEN & tically two dimensional habitat, has made WEIR 2004). Most water striders are found water striders popular objects in studies of in freshwater habitats, such as rivers, behavior, ecology and evolution (SPENCE & streams, lakes and ponds, but a few genera ANDERSEN 1994; ROWE et al.
    [Show full text]