DOCSLIB.ORG

Nearctic Chironomidae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Agriculture I*l Canada A catalog of Nearctic Chironomidae A catalog of Catalogue des Nearctic Chironomidae Chironomidae delardgion ndarctique D.R. Oliver and M.E. Dillon D.R. Oliver et M.E. Dillon Biosystematics Research Centre Centre de recherches biosyst6matiques Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0C6 K1A 0C6 and et P.S. Cranston P.S. Cranston Commonwealth Scientific and Organisation de la recherche Industrial Research scientifique et industrielle du Organization, Entomology Commonwealth, Entomologie Canberra ACT 2601 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Australie Research Branch Direction g6n6rale de la recherche Agriculture Canada Agriculture Canada Publication 185718 Publication 185718 1 990 1 990 @Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1990 oMinistre des Approvisionnement et Services Canada 1990 Available in Canada through En vente au Canada par I'entremise de nos Authorized Bookstore Agents agents libraires agr66s et autres and other bmkstores libraires. or by mail from ou par la poste au Canadian Govemnent Publishing Centre Centre d'6dition du gouvemement du Supply and Servies Canada Canada Oltawa, Canada K1A 0S9 Approvisionnements et Seryies Canada Ottawa (Canada) K1A 0S9 Cat No. A43-I85'7ll99O N" de cat A43-785117990 ISBN 0-660-55839-4 ISBN 0-660-55839-4 Price subject to change without notic€ Prix sujet i changemenl sans pr6avis Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Donn6ee de catalogage avant publication (Canada) Oliver, D.R. Oliver, D.R. A mtalog of Nearctic Chironomidae A atalog of Nearctic Chironomidae (Publication ; 1857/8) (Publiation ; 18578) Text in English and French- Texle en anglais et en frangais. Includes bibliographiel referenes. Comprend des r6f6rences bibliogr. Issued by Research Branch, Agriculture Canada. Publi6 par Direction g6n6rale de la recherche, Cat No. A43-1857/19908 Agriculture Canada ISBN 0-660-55839-4 N' de cal A43-1857/1990F ISBN 0-660-55839-4 1. Chironomidae--Ameria. 1. Chironomidae--Am6rique. 2. Chironomidae-- 2. Chironomidae--Nomenclature. I. Dillon, M.E Nonenclature. I. Dillon, M.E. II. Cranston, II. Cranston, P.S. III. Canada. Agriculture P.S. III. Canada. Agriculture Canada. IV. Canada. IV. Title. V. Title: Catalogue des Titre. V. Titre: C:talogue des Chironomidae de Chironomidae de la r6gion n6arctique. VI. la r6gion n6arctique. VI. Titre: Chironomidae Title: Nearctic Chironomidae. VII. Series: de la rEgion n6arctique. VII. Clllection: PubUcation (Canada. Agriculture Canada). Publiation (Canada. Agriculture Canada). English ; 1857,18. Franqais ; 1857,8. QL537.C45604 1990 595.77'7 C90-099ttt-98 QL537.C45604 1990 595.77',1 C90-099111-9F Cover Couverture Adult male of Chirnmw pfumm (Linnaeus) M6le adulte du Chironomw plumm (Linnaeus) Produced by Research Program Senrice Production du Seruie aux programmes de recherches TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIERES INTRODUCTION.. ....1 INTRODUCTION . ....4 FORMAT ,,...1 MODEDEPRESENTATION .. ........ 4 ABBREVIATIONS .....2 ABREVIATIONS ....,.5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......3 REMERCIEMENTS ....6 FamilyCHIRONOMIDAE .......7 Famille des CHIRONOMIDAE ......... 7 Subfamily TELMATOGETONINAE . 7 Sous-famille des TELMATOGETONINAE . 7 SubfamilyPODONOMINAE ....... 7 Sous-famille des PODONOMINAE . 7 TTibeBOREOCHLINI ........ 7 Tribu des BOREOCHLINI .. ...... 7 TTibePODONOMINI ......... 8 Tribu desPODONOMINI ........... 8 SubfamilyTANYPODINAE ........ 8 Sous-famille des TANYPODINAE . 8 Tribe COELOTANYPODINI . .. 8 Tribu des COELOTANYPODINI . 8 TTibeMACROPELOPIINI ...... 8 Tribu des MACROPELOPIINI . 8 TTibeNATARSIINI ...10 TTibUdesNATARSIINI ..... 10 TTibePENTANEURINI ....... 10 Tribu des PENTANEURINI . 10 TTibePROCLADIINI ........ 74 Tribu des PROCLADIINI . .. .... 14 Tribe TANYPODINI .. ....... 16 Tribu desTANYPODINI ..... 16 SubfamilyDIAMESINAE ...16 Sous-famille des DIAMESINAE . 16 Tribe BOREOHEPTAGYIINL . .'16 Tribu des BOREOHEPTAGYIINI . 16 TTibeDIAMESINI .. ........ 16 Tribu desDIAMESINI ...... 16 TTibePROTANYPINI . ....... 19 Tribu des PROTANYPINI . .. 19 SubfamiIyPRODLAMESINAE ..... 19 Sous-famille des PRODIAMESINAE . 19 SubfamilyORTIIOCLADIINAE . ... 20 Sous-famille des ORTHOCLADIINAE . 20 SubfamilyCHIRONOMINAE ... ... 40 Sous-famille des CHIRONOMINAE . 40 TTibeCHIRONOMINI ....... 40 Tribu des CHIRONOMINI . .... 40 Tribe PSEUDOCHIRONOMINI . 55 Tribu des PSEUDOCHIRONOMINL . 55 TTibeTANYIARSINI .. ...... 55 Tribu des TANYTARSINI . 55 REFERENCES ,.., ... 60 BIBLIOGRAPHIE .. ... 60 rNDEX .... 76 INDEX ... 76 INTRODUCTION Adults of the family Chironomidae are Subtette 0[ iver, Di [ [on commonly called chironomids, midges, and and nonbiting midges, or chironomid midges, and Subtette Cranston 't965 1990 the red larvae of some groups are called bloodworms. Chironomid larvae occur in all G ene Fa 205 types of aquatic and semiaquatic habitats and to a lesser extent in brackish and marine Spec i es 601 1 051 waters, and semiterrestrial and terrestrial habitats. Aquatic ecosystems are usually dominated by larval chironomids, in terms of The need for an updated catalog of Nearctic number of species, biomass, or both. They Chironomidae is evident. are important in the breakdown of organic Accordingly we have prepared a catalog of material and recycling nutrients, as food for the taxa of Chironomidae recorded from the fish, birds, and both terrestrial and aquatic Nearctic region, with information on their invertebrates, and as predators of aquatic distribution and revelent literature. ThiS invertebrates. Some species can tolerate the catalog is based only on published data to the most polluted conditions, whereas others have end of 1989; it does not include unpublished very special requirements and quickly data in collections, such as the Canadian disappear when their habitat is stressed. National Collection of Insects. We have Thus the Chironomidae have exceptional attempted to list all published names, valid or potential to act as biological indicators of not, that have been used in the literature aquatic environmental health. pertaining to the Nearctic region. A few The family is distributioned around the older faunal lists (Leonard 1928; Johnson world, occurring in all zoogeographical 1925; Brimley 1938; Petch and Maltais 1932) regions, including Antarctica. Currently 10 are not included because they contain many subfamilies and 24 tribes (Ashe 1983) are obviously incorrect determinations. As the recognized, of which 7 subfamilies and 14 taxa are presented uncritically in their most tribes occur in the Nearctic region. A recently published taxonomic position, it minimum of 5000 species are found around should not be construed that we are in the world and at least 2000 of these in the agreement with all the taxonomic placements. Nearctic region. This catalog will be continuously updated The nonspecialist was faced, until recently, with periodic publication of additions and with two generic classifications. This dual corrections. To assist us in keeping an system arose during the first half of this updated list, we request any errors or century, because one group of workers omissions, and copies of publications with principally emphasized the immature stages information on taxonomy and distribution of and the other emphasized adults. Pinder Nearctic Chironomidae. be sent to either of (1983) gives a brief history of the the first two authors. development of the two systems and their reconciliation. Reconciliation of the two FORMAT systems has culminated in the classification The arrangement of names is alphabetical, used in the three volumes of the except for the subfamily-group names which Chironomidae of the Holarctic region edited follow the phylogenetic arrangement of the by Wiederholm (1983, 1986, 1989) and that Holarctic Chironomidae volumes. Species- classification is used herein. group names follow the subfamily, tribe, The last catalog of Nearctic Chironomidae genus, and subgenus headings (not all groups (Sublette and Sublette 1965) was published have been assigned tribes or subgenera). The about 25 years ago. The intervening years first occurrence of all valid names are printed has been a period of intense chironomid in boldface type along the left margin of each research, including much taxonomic and column. Valid taxa that have been ecological study. The following table shows incorrectly reported from the Nearctic region the increase in the number of valid generic- are also listed along the left margin but they and species-level names between 1965 and are printed in italics as are all other listing of 1989. names, valid or invalid. Citations for genus-group names are arranged as in the following example. NEARCTIC CHIRONOMIDAE Genus NANOCLADIUS Kieffer original binomial citation is next, followed by Nanocladius Kieffer, 1913d: 31. subspecies or varieties and then synonyms (if Type-species, vitellinus Kieffer any), which are cited in their original form (orig. des.). with author, date, page, and type-locatity. Microcric otopas Thienemann & Type-localities for Canada and the United Ilarnisch, 1.932: 1.37. States are listed by province, territory or Type-species, Cricotopus state; all others are listed by country or al b icornis Goetghebuer larger geographical regions where country is (Goetghebuer in Goetghebuer & not known. Lenz, 1944: 114) = Chironomus bicolor Zetterstedt. ABBREVIATIONS The abbreviations used are as follows: Subgenus Nanocladius Kieffer General &- and The original citation is given in the second o., E.- east, eastern line, indented, followed by synonyms (if any), emend.- emended also indented. The genus name is followed I., Is.- Island,
Recommended publications
  • Bottom Fauna of the Mississippi River Near Keokuk, Iowa, with Particular Reference to Possible Control of Ephemeroptera and Tric

    Bottom Fauna of the Mississippi River Near Keokuk, Iowa, with Particular Reference to Possible Control of Ephemeroptera and Tric

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1963 Bottom fauna of the Mississippi River near Keokuk, Iowa, with particular reference to possible control of Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera Clarence Albert Carlson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Carlson, Clarence Albert, "Bottom fauna of the Mississippi River near Keokuk, Iowa, with particular reference to possible control of Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera " (1963). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2956. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2956 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOTTOM FAUNA OF HIE MISSISSIPPI RIVER NEAR KEOKUK, IOWA, VttlH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO POSSIBLE CONTROL OF EmEMEROPTBRA AND TRICHOPTBRA by Clarence Albert Carlson, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF miLOSOHiY Major Subject: Zoology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. n Charge of Major Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean, College Iowa State University
  • The Predatory Behaviour of Monopelopia Tenuicalcar (Kieffer, 1918) Larvae in a Laboratory Experiment

    The Predatory Behaviour of Monopelopia Tenuicalcar (Kieffer, 1918) Larvae in a Laboratory Experiment

    J. Limnol., 2018; 77(s1): 88-94 DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2018.1792 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). The predatory behaviour of Monopelopia tenuicalcar (Kieffer, 1918) larvae in a laboratory experiment Vít SYROVÁTKA* Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Larvae of the subfamily Tanypodinae are in general regarded as predators. Actual predation has been observed directly in only a few Tanypodinae species, but their behaviour and mouthpart morphology suggest that all Tanypodinae ingest food in the same way and thus are all predators. This view is reflected in most autecological databases. There remains uncertainty for some species, most notably for Monopelopia tenuicalcar (Kieffer, 1918). The uncertainty stems from the lack of direct observations, while gut content analysis points to non-animal food sources. A laboratory experiment was carried out in which larvae of Corynoneura sp. were offered to M. tenuicalcar in a set of Petri dishes. All predator and prey larvae were collected from the same locality, where they were the most abundant members of early spring littoral community. M. tenuicalcar showed clear predatory behaviour. In most cases (84 out of 86) the predator larva pierced the larva of Corynoneura and sucked its inner bodyonly content instead of engulfing it. Only in two cases did the predator engulf the whole victim. In all cases the seizing and processing of the prey was the same, with the ingestion of the food carried out by strong sucking.
  • Data Quality, Performance, and Uncertainty in Taxonomic Identification for Biological Assessments

    Data Quality, Performance, and Uncertainty in Taxonomic Identification for Biological Assessments

    J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 2008, 27(4):906–919 Ó 2008 by The North American Benthological Society DOI: 10.1899/07-175.1 Published online: 28 October 2008 Data quality, performance, and uncertainty in taxonomic identification for biological assessments 1 2 James B. Stribling AND Kristen L. Pavlik Tetra Tech, Inc., 400 Red Brook Blvd., Suite 200, Owings Mills, Maryland 21117-5159 USA Susan M. Holdsworth3 Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Mail Code 4503T, Washington, DC 20460 USA Erik W. Leppo4 Tetra Tech, Inc., 400 Red Brook Blvd., Suite 200, Owings Mills, Maryland 21117-5159 USA Abstract. Taxonomic identifications are central to biological assessment; thus, documenting and reporting uncertainty associated with identifications is critical. The presumption that comparable results would be obtained, regardless of which or how many taxonomists were used to identify samples, lies at the core of any assessment. As part of a national survey of streams, 741 benthic macroinvertebrate samples were collected throughout the eastern USA, subsampled in laboratories to ;500 organisms/sample, and sent to taxonomists for identification and enumeration. Primary identifications were done by 25 taxonomists in 8 laboratories. For each laboratory, ;10% of the samples were randomly selected for quality control (QC) reidentification and sent to an independent taxonomist in a separate laboratory (total n ¼ 74), and the 2 sets of results were compared directly. The results of the sample-based comparisons were summarized as % taxonomic disagreement (PTD) and % difference in enumeration (PDE). Across the set of QC samples, mean values of PTD and PDE were ;21 and 2.6%, respectively.
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past

    R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past

    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
  • CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research

    CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research

    CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research No. 25 ISSN 0172-1941 (printed) 1891-5426 (online) November 2012 CONTENTS Editorial: Inventories - What are they good for? 3 Dr. William P. Coffman: Celebrating 50 years of research on Chironomidae 4 Dear Sepp! 9 Dr. Marta Margreiter-Kownacka 14 Current Research Sharma, S. et al. Chironomidae (Diptera) in the Himalayan Lakes - A study of sub- fossil assemblages in the sediments of two high altitude lakes from Nepal 15 Krosch, M. et al. Non-destructive DNA extraction from Chironomidae, including fragile pupal exuviae, extends analysable collections and enhances vouchering 22 Martin, J. Kiefferulus barbitarsis (Kieffer, 1911) and Kiefferulus tainanus (Kieffer, 1912) are distinct species 28 Short Communications An easy to make and simple designed rearing apparatus for Chironomidae 33 Some proposed emendations to larval morphology terminology 35 Chironomids in Quaternary permafrost deposits in the Siberian Arctic 39 New books, resources and announcements 43 Finnish Chironomidae 47 Chironomini indet. (Paratendipes?) from La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Photo by Carlos de la Rosa. CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research Editors Torbjørn EKREM, Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Peter H. LANGTON, 16, Irish Society Court, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1GX The CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research is devoted to all aspects of chironomid research and aims to be an updated news bulletin for the Chironomidae research community. The newsletter is published yearly in October/November, is open access, and can be downloaded free from this website: http:// www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/chironomus. Publisher is the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway.
  • Aquatic Diptera As Indicators of Pollution in a Midwestern Stream

    Aquatic Diptera As Indicators of Pollution in a Midwestern Stream

    AQUATIC DIPTERA AS INDICATORS OF POLLUTION IN A MIDWESTERN STREAM GEORGE H. PAINE, JR. AND ARDEN R. GAUFIN Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, Public Health Service, Cincinnati, Ohio A knowledge of the ecological requirements of aquatic organisms, especially the benthic forms, is of outstanding importance to biologists in determining the degree and extent of pollution in streams. An examination of bottom fauna serves to indicate conditions not only at the time of examination but also over considerable periods in the past. Those organisms having an annual life cycle will by their presence or absence indicate any unusual occurrence which took place during several previous months. Satisfactory use of aquatic organisms as indicators of pollution and self-purification of water is dependent upon a know- ledge of the normal habitats of these organisms and their sensitivity to varying environmental factors such as pollution. Among the aquatic invertebrates, insects such as the mayflies, stoneflies, and caddis flies are primarily restricted to clean water conditions. By comparison, forms such as the pulmonate snails, Tubificid worms, and certain species of leeches can more often be found under conditions where high organic and/or low oxygen content exist. Still other groups such as the Diptera, or true flies, are repre- sented by forms which may be found in all types of stream habitats from the cleanest situation to the most polluted water. Because aquatic Diptera are to be found in many different ecological niches in both clean and polluted water and many species are highly selective in their choice of habitat, they constitute one of the most important groups of indicator organisms.
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019

    Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019

    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
  • A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamilies of Larval Chironomidae

    A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamilies of Larval Chironomidae

    Envlronment Canada Environnement Canada Fisheries Service des pêches .1 and Marine Service et des sciences de la mer L .' 1 '; ( 1 l r A Guide for the Identification of Two Subfamil ies of Larval Chironomidae: ,1"'--- The Chironominae and Tanypodlnae . : - - . ) / Found .in Benthic Studies Jin the / r~---.-_ c L___ r - - '" - .Ç"'''''-. Winnipeg River in the Vicinity ot Pine Falls, Manitoba in 1971 and 1972 by P. L. Stewart J.S. Loch Technical Report Series No. CEN/T-73-12 Resource Management Branch Central Region DEPARTMÈNT OF THE ENViRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERViCE Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region Technical Reports Series No. CEN/T-73-12 A guide for the identification of two subfami lies of larva l Chironomidae~ the Chironominae and Tanypodinae found in benthic studies in the Winnipeg Riv~r in the vicinity of Pine Falls, Manitoba, in 1971 and 1972. by: P.L. Stewart qnd J.S. Loch ERRATA Page13: The caption for Figure 5A should read: Mentum and ventromental plates..•... instead of: submentum and ventromental plates..•.. Page 14: The caption for Figure 5B should read: Mentum and ventromental plates . instead of: submentum and ventromental plates.... DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FISHERIES AND MARINE SERVICE Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region Technical Report Series No: CEN/T-73-12 A GUIDE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF IWO SUBF.AMILIES OF LARVM.... CHIRONOMIDAE: THE CHIRONOMINAE AND TANYPODINAE FOUND IN BENTHIC STUDIES IN THE WINNIPEG RIVER IN THE vrCINITY OF PINE FM....LS, MANITOBA IN 1971 and 1972 by P. L. Stewart and J. S. Loch Resource Management Branch Fisheries Operations Directorate Central Region, Winnipeg November 1973 i ABSTRACT Identifying characteristics of the genera of two subfamilies of larvae of the midge family, C~onomldae (Vlpt~a), the C~ono­ mlnae and the Tanypodlnae, are presented with illustrations for the purpose of simplifying identification of these two groups by novice and more experienced personnel involved in assessment of benthic faunal composition.
  • Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland

    Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 63–90 (2014)Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland 63 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland Lauri Paasivirta1 1 Ruuhikoskenkatu 17 B 5, FI-24240 Salo, Finland Corresponding author: Lauri Paasivirta ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 10 March 2014 | Accepted 26 August 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/F3343ED1-AE2C-43B4-9BA1-029B5EC32763 Citation: Paasivirta L (2014) Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 63–90. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 Abstract A checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. Keywords Finland, Chironomidae, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction There are supposedly at least 15 000 species of chironomid midges in the world (Armitage et al. 1995, but see Pape et al. 2011) making it the largest family among the aquatic insects. The European chironomid fauna consists of 1262 species (Sæther and Spies 2013). In Finland, 780 species can be found, of which 37 are still undescribed (Paasivirta 2012). The species checklist written by B. Lindeberg on 23.10.1979 (Hackman 1980) included 409 chironomid species. Twenty of those species have been removed from the checklist due to various reasons. The total number of species increased in the 1980s to 570, mainly due to the identification work by me and J. Tuiskunen (Bergman and Jansson 1983, Tuiskunen and Lindeberg 1986).
  • Table of Contents 2

    Table of Contents 2

    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article

    How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article

    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 ISSN: 2215-2075 Universidad de Costa Rica Villamarín, Christian; Villamarín-Cortez, Santiago; Salcido, Danielle-M.; Herrera-Madrid, Mauricio; Ríos-Touma, Blanca Drivers of diversity and altitudinal distribution of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the Ecuadorian Andes Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 69, no. 1, 2021, January-March, pp. 113-126 Universidad de Costa Rica DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v69i1.40964 Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44967852010 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative ISSN Printed: 0034-7744 ISSN digital: 2215-2075 DOI 10.15517/rbt.v69i1.40964 Drivers of diversity and altitudinal distribution of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the Ecuadorian Andes Christian Villamarín1*, Santiago Villamarín-Cortez2,3, Danielle M. Salcido2, Mauricio Herrera-Madrid3 & Blanca Ríos-Touma1 1. Grupo de Investigación BIOMAS, Facultad de Ingenierías y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de Las Américas, C/ José Queri, Quito, Ecuador; [email protected], [email protected] 2. Department of Biology, PhD Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, United States of America; [email protected], [email protected] 3. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INABIO), Rumipamba 341 y Av. Shyris, Quito, Ecuador; [email protected] * Correspondence. Received 03-III-2020. Corrected 15-X-2020. Accepted 04-XI-2020. ABSTRACT. Introduction: Chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) are the most globally diverse and widely distributed aquatic insects.