Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX (2008) 1019.pdf ORIGIN, DISTRIBUTION, AND CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY OF ASYMMETRIC SECONDARY CRATERS ASSOCIATED WITH NEARSIDE LUNAR BASINS. W. A. Ambrose1, 1Bureau of Economic Ge- ology, The University of Texas at Austin, University Station, Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924,
[email protected]. Introduction: Many asymmetric, non-main- from these small, complex craters by their narrow rims sequence lunar craters are inferred to be secondary- and by a lack of significant slumps. impact features caused by major, basin-scale impacts. Degradation. Secondary craters are inferred to Ranging in diameter from 10 to 35 km, they have po- exhibit similar levels of degradation with genetically lygonal outlines, are narrow rimmed, shallow (com- associated impact basins. Nectarian and Pre-Nectarian monly <1.5 km deep), and occur tens to hundreds of secondaries should therefore have smooth, degraded kilometers beyond the outer rim of major impact ba- rims and high cratering densities. However, some sins. Some are teardrop shaped, reflecting low-angle asymmetric craters in the 10- to 35-km-diameter range, impacts; similar morphologies for low-angle impacts such as Proclus, Messier, and Messier A, have sharp have been demonstrated experimentally and are docu- rims, low cratering densities, bright ejecta, and are mented for a variety of asymmetric lunar craters [1, 2]. therefore interpreted to postdate large basins. The trajectory and source area of ejecta blocks that Basins: The preservation potential for asymmetric formed asymmetric secondary craters can be inferred secondary craters, scour features, and crater chains is from the orientation of teardrop-shaped rims, which inferred to be high for the relatively younger Imbrium typically point away from associated impact basins.