A History of Roman Art Free

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Roman Art Free FREE A HISTORY OF ROMAN ART PDF Steven L. Tuck | 408 pages | 27 Jan 2015 | John Wiley and Sons Ltd | 9781444330267 | English | Chicester, United Kingdom Introduction to ancient Roman art – Smarthistory Trajan's Column Showing pedestal, shaft, capital and statue of St Peter on top. Note: For later artists and styles inspired by the arts of ancient Rome, see: Classicism in Art onwards. The Severan Tondo: panel painting of the Imperial Family c. Depicts the "rain miracle of Quadi". God rescues the Roman Legion from destruction by barberians by creating a terrible storm. For several centuries Ancient Rome was the most powerful nation on earth, excelling all others at military organization and warfare, engineering, and architecture. Its unique cultural achievements include the invention of the dome and the groin vault, the development of concrete and a European-wide network of roads and bridges. Despite this, Roman sculptors and painters produced only a limited amount of outstanding original fine artpreferring instead to recycle designs from Greek art, which they revered as far superior to their own. Indeed, many types of art practised by the Romans - including, sculpture bronze and marble statuary, sarcophagifine art painting murals, portraiture, vase-paintingand decorative art including metalworkmosaics, jewelleryivory carving had already been fully mastered by Ancient Greek artists. Not surprisingly, therefore, while numerous Greek sculptors like Phidias, Kresilas, Myron, A History of Roman Art, Callimachus, Skopas, Lysippos, Praxiteles, and Leochares, Phyromachos and painters like Apollodorus, Zeuxis of Heraclea, Agatharchos, Parrhasius, Apelles of Kos, Antiphilus, Euphranor of Corinth were accorded great respect throughout the Hellenistic world, most Roman artists were regarded as no more than skilled tradesmen and have remained anonymous. Of course it is wrong to say that Roman art was devoid of innovation: its urban architecture was ground-breaking, as was its landscape painting and portrait busts. Nor is it true that Roman artists produced no great masterpieces - witness the extraordinary relief A History of Roman Art on monuments like Ara Pacis Augustae and Trajan's Column. But on the whole, we can say that Roman art was predominantly derivative and, above all, utilitarian. It served a purpose, a higher good: the dissemination of Roman values along with a respect for Roman power. As it transpired, classical Roman art has been immensely influential on many subsequent cultures, through revivalist movements like Neoclassical architecturewhich have shaped much European and American architectureas exemplified by the US Capitol Building The lesser-known Classical Revival in modern art led to a return to figure painting as well as new abstract movements like Cubism. Although Rome was founded as far back as BCE, it led a precarious existence for several centuries. Initially, it was ruled by Etruscan kings who commissioned a variety of Etruscan art murals, sculptures and metalwork for their tombs as well as their palaces, and to celebrate their military victories. After the founding of the Roman Republic A History of Roman Art BCE, Etruscan influence waned and, from BCE, as the Romans started coming into contact with the flourishing Greek cities of southern Italy and the eastern Mediterranean, they fell under the influence of Greek art - a process known as Hellenization. Soon many A History of Roman Art works of art were being taken to Rome as booty, and many Greek artists followed to pursue their careers under Roman patronage. However, the arts were still not a priority for Roman leaders who were more concerned about survival and military affairs. It wasn't until about BCE after it won the first Punic War against Hannibal and the Carthaginians, that Rome felt secure enough to develop its culture. Even then, the absence of an independent cultural tradition of its own meant that most ancient art of Rome imitated Greek works. Rome was unique among the powers of the ancient world in developing only a limited artistic language of its own. Cultural Inferiority Complex. Roman architecture and engineering was never less than bold, but its painting and sculpture was based on Greek traditions and also on art forms developed in its vassal states like Egypt and Ancient Persia. To put it another way, despite their spectacular A History of Roman Art triumphs, the Romans had an inferiority complex in the face of Greek artistic achievement. Their ultra-pragmatic response was to recycle Greek sculpture at every opportunity. Greek poses, reworked with Roman clothes and accessories, were pressed into service to reinforce Roman power. Heroic Greek statues were even supplied A History of Roman Art, to enable the buyer to fit his own portrait head. An example is the equestrian bronze statue of Emperor Marcus Aurelius c. A History of Roman Art Greek Sculpture Made Simple. The reason for Rome's cultural inferiority complex remains unclear. Some Classical scholars have pointed to the pragmatic Roman temperament; others, A History of Roman Art the overriding Roman need for territorial security against the waves of marauding tribes from eastern and central Europe and the consequent low priority accorded to art and culture. To which we might add that - judging by the narrowness of Celtic art c. Moreover, we A History of Roman Art note that cities in Ancient Rome were less provincial and far more powerful than Greek city-states, so that its art invariably played a more functional role - not least because Roman culture was actually a melange of different beliefs and customs, all of which had to be accomodated. Thus, for example, art quickly became something of a status symbol: something to enhance the buyer's home and social position. And since most Romans recognized the intrinsic value of Greek artistry, buyers wanted Greek-style works. Like the Romans themselves, early Roman art c. Portraits, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional, were typically detailed and unidealized, although later during the age of Hellenistic-Roman art c. The same PR value was accorded to relief sculpture see, for instance, the Column of Marcus Aureliusand to history painting see, Triumphal Paintings, below. Thus when commemorating a battle, for example, the artwork used would be executed in a realistic - almost "documentary" style. This realistic down-to-earth Roman style is in vivid contrast to Hellenistic art which illustrated military achievements with mythological imagery. Paradoxically, one reason for the ultimate fall of Rome was because it became too attached to the propagandist value of its art, and squandered huge resources on grandiose building projects purely to impress the people. Construction of the Baths of Diocletianfor instance, monopolised the entire brick industry of Rome, for several years. Rome's greatest contribution to the history of art is undoubtedly to be found in the field of architectural design. Roman architecture during the age of the Republic knowledge of which derives largely from the 1st-century Roman architect Vitruvius discovered the round temple and the curved A History of Roman Art but, after the turn of the Millennium, Roman architects and engineers developed techniques for urban building on a massive scale. The erection of monumental structures like the Pantheon and the Colosseum, would have been impossible without Rome's development of the arch and the dome, as well as its mastery of strong and low-cost materials like concrete and bricks. For a comparison with building design in Ancient Egypt, please see: Egyptian Architecture c. The Romans didn't invent the arch - it was known but not much used in Greek architecture - but they were the first to master the use of multiple arches, or vaults. From this, they invented the Roman groin vault - two barrel vaults set at right-angles - which represented a revolutionary improvement on the old Greek post-and-lintel method, as it enabled architects to support far heavier loads and to span much wider openings. The Romans also made frequent use of the semicircular arch, typically without resorting to mortar: relying instead on the precision of their stonework. Arches and vaults played a critical role in the erection of buildings like the Baths A History of Roman Art Diocletian and the Baths of Caracallathe Basilica of Maxentius A History of Roman Art the Colosseum. The arch was also an essential component in the building of bridges, exemplified by the Pont du Gard and the bridge at Merida, and aqueducts, exemplified by the one at Segovia, and also the Aqua Claudia and Anio Novus in Rome itself. A further architectural development was the dome vaulted ceilingwhich made possible the construction and roofing of large open areas inside buildings, like Hadrian's Pantheonthe Basilica of Constantineas well as numerous other temples and basilicas, since far fewer columns were needed to support the weight of the domed roof. The use of domes went hand in hand with the extensive use of concrete - a combination sometimes referred to as the "Roman Architectural Revolution". But flagship buildings with domes were far from being the only architectural masterpieces built by Ancient Rome. Just as important was the five- storey apartment building known as an insulawhich accomodated thousands of citizens. It was during the age of Emperor Trajan CE and Emperor Hadrian CE that Rome reached the zenith of its architectural glory, attained through A History of Roman Art building programs of monuments, baths, aqueducts, A History of Roman Art, temples and mausoleums. Many of the buildings from this era and later, served as models for architects of the Italian Renaissancesuch as Filippo Brunelleschi designer of the iconic dome of the cathedral in Florence, and both Donato Bramante and Michelangelodesigners of St Peter's Basilica. The time of Constantine CE witnessed the last great building programs in the city of Rome, including the completion of the Baths of Diocletian and the erection of the Basilica of Maxentius and the Arch of Constantine.
Recommended publications
  • The History of Egypt Under the Ptolemies
    UC-NRLF $C lb EbE THE HISTORY OF EGYPT THE PTOLEMIES. BY SAMUEL SHARPE. LONDON: EDWARD MOXON, DOVER STREET. 1838. 65 Printed by Arthur Taylor, Coleman Street. TO THE READER. The Author has given neither the arguments nor the whole of the authorities on which the sketch of the earlier history in the Introduction rests, as it would have had too much of the dryness of an antiquarian enquiry, and as he has already published them in his Early History of Egypt. In the rest of the book he has in every case pointed out in the margin the sources from which he has drawn his information. » Canonbury, 12th November, 1838. Works published by the same Author. The EARLY HISTORY of EGYPT, from the Old Testament, Herodotus, Manetho, and the Hieroglyphieal Inscriptions. EGYPTIAN INSCRIPTIONS, from the British Museum and other sources. Sixty Plates in folio. Rudiments of a VOCABULARY of EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHICS. M451 42 ERRATA. Page 103, line 23, for Syria read Macedonia. Page 104, line 4, for Syrians read Macedonians. CONTENTS. Introduction. Abraham : shepherd kings : Joseph : kings of Thebes : era ofMenophres, exodus of the Jews, Rameses the Great, buildings, conquests, popu- lation, mines: Shishank, B.C. 970: Solomon: kings of Tanis : Bocchoris of Sais : kings of Ethiopia, B. c. 730 .- kings ofSais : Africa is sailed round, Greek mercenaries and settlers, Solon and Pythagoras : Persian conquest, B.C. 525 .- Inarus rebels : Herodotus and Hellanicus : Amyrtaus, Nectanebo : Eudoxus, Chrysippus, and Plato : Alexander the Great : oasis of Ammon, native judges,
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts
    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • VIVERE MILITARE EST from Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier Volume I
    VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier Volume I BELGRADE 2018 VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY MONOGRAPHIES No. 68/1 VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier VOM LU E I Belgrade 2018 PUBLISHER PROOFREADING Institute of Archaeology Dave Calcutt Kneza Mihaila 35/IV Ranko Bugarski 11000 Belgrade Jelena Vitezović http://www.ai.ac.rs Tamara Rodwell-Jovanović [email protected] Rajka Marinković Tel. +381 11 2637-191 GRAPHIC DESIGN MONOGRAPHIES 68/1 Nemanja Mrđić EDITOR IN CHIEF PRINTED BY Miomir Korać DigitalArt Beograd Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade PRINTED IN EDITORS 500 copies Snežana Golubović Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade COVER PAGE Nemanja Mrđić Tabula Traiana, Iron Gate Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade REVIEWERS EDITORiaL BOARD Diliana Angelova, Departments of History of Art Bojan Ðurić, University of Ljubljana, Faculty and History Berkeley University, Berkeley; Vesna of Arts, Ljubljana; Cristian Gazdac, Faculty of Dimitrijević, Faculty of Philosophy, University History and Philosophy University of Cluj-Napoca of Belgrade, Belgrade; Erik Hrnčiarik, Faculty of and Visiting Fellow at the University of Oxford; Philosophy and Arts, Trnava University, Trnava; Gordana Jeremić, Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade; Kristina Jelinčić Vučković, Institute of Archaeology, Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade; Zagreb; Mario Novak, Institute for Anthropological Ioan Piso, Faculty of History and Philosophy Research,
    [Show full text]
  • The Reconstruction of Lost Greek Historical Paintings of the Fifth and Fourth Centuries B.C
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 5:45 p.m. Cahiers d'histoire Historical Events as a Means of Iconographic Interpretation: The Reconstruction of Lost Greek Historical Paintings of the Fifth and Fourth Centuries B.C. Anastasia Painesi Metamorphosis praxeon : nouvelles approches et thèmes en histoire Article abstract ancienne The disappearance of Greek monumental painting causes fundamental Volume 31, Number 2, Fall 2012 problems in the study of this particular form of art. Texts referring to or works of art inspired by Greek paintings seem to be frequently inadequate at the task URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019288ar of providing a realistic reconstruction of the painted works. Nevertheless, the DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019288ar reconstruction of the date and type of representation of historical paintings seems to be facilitated by texts of historical context that offer valuable informations on the events that inspired the painters of the fifth and fourth See table of contents Centuries B.C. This paper will examine specific cases of Classical paintings, such as the Battle of Marathon and the Battle of Mantineia, whose iconographical reconstruction depends considerably on historiographical Publisher(s) testimonies. Cahiers d'histoire ISSN 0712-2330 (print) 1929-610X (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Painesi, A. (2012). Historical Events as a Means of Iconographic Interpretation: The Reconstruction of Lost Greek Historical Paintings of the Fifth and Fourth Centuries B.C. Cahiers d'histoire, 31(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019288ar Tous droits réservés © Cahiers d'histoire, 2013 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Empire During the Severan Dynasty
    The Roman Empire during the Severan Dynasty John Cabot University, Rome, April 15-16, 2011 FRIDAY, APRIL 15, 2011, (TIBER CAMPUS, JCU) 9:00-9:15 Introduction by Eric C. De Sena SESSION I – ROMAN PROVINCES DURING THE SEVERAN PERIOD 9:15-9:35 Simone Rambaldi (Università degli Studi di Bologna/ Facoltà di Conservazione dei Beni Culturali, Trapani). L’attività edilizia romana a destinazione pubblica fra i Severi e i Soldatenkaiser: trasformazioni e continuità. 9:35-9:55 Jean-Paul Petit (Parc Archeologique europeen de Bliesbruck-Reinheim) and Sara Santoro (Università degli Studi di Chieti). Lo sviluppo del vicus Bliesbruck (Moselle, France) agli inizi del III sec. d.C. e la vitalità della Gallia Belgica mosellana nell’epoca dei Severi. 9:55-10:15 Alice Dazzi (Università degli Studi di Parma). Water works and monuments in the Severan Age: some considerations. 10:15-10:30 Discussion Coffee Break 10:30-10:45 10:45-11:05 Giovanni Distefano (Università della Calabria/Parco Archeologico di Camarina). Cartagine durante l'età Severiana. 11:05-11:25 Tino Lelekovic (Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts). Southern Pannonia in the time of the Severans. 11:25-11:45 Müjde Turkmen (Istanbul University). Architectural decoration of the Severan period in Pamphylia and Cilicia. 11.45-12:00 Discussion Lunch Break 12:00-12:50 SESSION II – ASPECTS OF THE ECONOMY DURING THE SEVERAN PERIOD 12:50-13:10 Giancarlo Germanà (Accademia di Belle Arti di Siracusa). Some observations on Sicily during the Severan Dynasty. 13:10-13:30 Daniele Malfitana (CNR – Università di Catania). Economy of Sicily during the Severan Period.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Painting and the Challene of Mimesis
    CHAPTER 14 Greek Painting and the Challenge of Mimesis̄ Hariclia Brecoulaki A pigeon had grown very thirsty, so she flew from place to place looking for some water to drink. She saw a water jar painted on a wall and thought that it was actually full of water, so she flew right into the wall in order to take a drink. Aesop, Fables 431, The Pigeon and the Painting Introduction: The School of Sicyon, Chrestographiā , and “undecaying beauty” The city of Sicyon, known for centuries for her famous school of arts (Strabo VIII, 6, 23; Plut. Arat. 12), auctioned her public painting collection to pay debts to Rome sometime in the second half of the first century BC (Cic. Ad Att. I, 19.9; 20.4). The paintings were acquired by the Roman aedile Aemilius Scaurus in 58 BC and exhibited at the wooden theater in the Campus Martius (Pliny, NH 35.127). Numerous wooden panels were seized as war booty from Greek cities or purchased to decorate public and private buildings in Rome (Raoul Rochette 1836; Carey 2004; Rouveret 2007a). However, the paintings created by the Sicyonian masters seem to have been the most prized ones. The orator Hortensius paid 114,000 sesterces to buy the Argonauts of Cydias and made a shrine for its display at his villa at Tusculum (Pliny, NH 35.130). Augustus paid the city of Cos a hundred talents to carry Apelles’ legendary Anadyomene off to Rome, where it was dedicated in the Shrine of his father Caesar (Pliny, NH 35.91). Following the conquest of Egypt, he transferred many of Apelles’ paintings, together with the wooden panels that originally decorated Alexander’s funerary cart (Diod.
    [Show full text]
  • Dying by the Sword: Did the Severan Dynasty Owe Its Downfall to Its Ultimate Failure to Live up to Its Own Militaristic Identity?
    Dying by the Sword: Did the Severan dynasty owe its downfall to its ultimate failure to live up to its own militaristic identity? Exam Number: B043183 Master of Arts with Honours in Classical Studies Exam Number: B043183 1 Acknowledgements Warm thanks to Dr Matthew Hoskin for his keen supervision, and to Dr Alex Imrie for playing devil’s advocate and putting up with my daft questions. Thanks must also go to my family whose optimism and belief in my ability so often outweighs my own. Exam Number: B043183 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations 3 Introduction 4 Chapter One – Living by the Sword 6 Chapter Two – Dying by the Sword 23 Chapter Three – Of Rocky Ground and Great Expectations 38 Conclusion 45 Bibliography 48 Word Count: 14,000 Exam Number: B043183 3 List of Illustrations Fig. 1. Chart detailing the percentage of military coin types promoted by emperors from Pertinax to Numerian inclusive (Source: Manders, E. (2012), Coining Images of Power: Patterns in the Representation of Roman Emperors on Imperial Coinage, AD 193-284, Leiden, p. 65, fig. 17). Fig. 2. Portrait statue showing Caracalla in full military guise (Source: https://www.dailysabah.com/history/2016/08/02/worlds-only-single-piece-2nd-century- caracalla-statue-discovered-in-southern-turkey (Accessed 14/01/17). Fig. 3. Bust of Caracalla wearing sword strap and paludamentum (Source: Leander Touati, A.M. (1991), ‘Portrait and historical relief. Some remarks on the meaning of Caracalla’s sole ruler portrait’, in A.M. Leander Touati, E. Rystedt, and O. Wikander (eds.), Munusula Romana, Stockholm, 117-31, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Tragic Themes in Large Paintings. from the Work on the New Overbeck
    Hyperboreus Vol.16-17 (2010-2011) “VARIANTE LOQUELLA” 232 Bernd Seidensticker Bernd Seidensticker TRAGIC THEMES IN LARGE PAINTINGS. FROM THE WORK ON THE NEW OVERBECK Johannes Overbeck’s Antike Schriftquellen zur Geschichte der bildenden Künste bei den Griechen of 1868 has been – and still is – an essential work-tool not only for all disciplines of Altertumswissenschaften, but also for art history and many other areas of the cultural sciences. But time has taken its toll: After almost 150 years, the increase in the pertinent material and in our knowledge of Greek art and the considerable changes in the qualifi cations and needs of the different users call for a substantial philological and archaeological revision of the book to turn the collection of sources into a modern interdisciplinary research tool. A small group of philologists, archaeologists and epigraphers in Berlin1 have undertaken this task and are presently working to update – or perhaps rather to replace – the Old Overbeck. The most important steps of the revision are: 1. The addition of new or overlooked testimonia Overbeck has 2400 testimonia (plus a supplementum of about 100). We will be able to add approximately 500 new literary testimonia. They come from new texts, yet unknown to Overbeck, as e. g. Herondas’ Mimiamb IV (with the mention of the sons of Praxiteles and of Apelles) or the New Poseidippos which contains nine epigrams on masterpieces of sculpture, among them statues, about which we had no previous knowledge – like the Tydeus (or perhaps a group of the Seven against Thebes) by Myron (Nr. 69 AB), or the statue of the poet Philitas by Hecataeus (Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Aetion, Artist of the Age of Alexander
    Искусство и художественная культура Древнего мира 103 УДК: 7.032 ББК: 85.103(0)32 А43 DOI: 10.18688/aa177-1-11 Antonio Corso Aetion, Artist of the Age of Alexander Aetion was a renowned painter of pictures who is known thanks to several passages of an- cient writers, especially of Cicero, Pliny and Lucian: these three authorities were quite learned in the realm of visual arts [7, pp. 257–263]. The chronologically first surviving testimony about this artist is Cicero,Paradoxa Stoicorum 33–38. In this passage the writer from Arpinum is criticizing the Romans who madly loved works of art by the greatest Greek masters, because they were not free but slaves of their pas- sions: “You stand gaping spell-bound before a picture of Aetion or a statue of Polyclitus. I pass over the question where you got it from and how you come to have it, but when I see you gazing and marveling and uttering cries of admiration, I judge you to be the slave of any foolishness. ‘Then are not those kinds of things delightful?’ Granted that they are, for we also have trained eyes; but I beg of you, do let the charm that those things are deemed to possess make them serve not as fetters for men but as amusements for children” (transl. Loeb with amendments). We argue from this passage that in late republican Rome pictures of Aetion were objects of deeply felt admiration. They were collected by private owners but were also disliked by the most traditionalist quarter of the Roman society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Education of Artists in Ancient Greece
    Hyperboreus 18:1 (2012) Antonio Corso THE EDUCATION OF ARTISTS IN ANCIENT GREECE Introductory Remarks The aim of this article is to collect the written evidence which may help us to understand what type of education and training ancient Greek artists enjoyed throughout the different ages and in the most important artistic centres. As I shall point out several documents may be also enlightening about the relations between masters and pupils and may indicate the infl uence of philosophical ideas on this phenomenon. I believe that this topic has been little studied and that several relevant sources have not yet been fully used in order to enhance our knowledge of this issue.1 These considerations hopefully justify the present study of this topic. Masters and pupils in the workshops of artists of archaic Greece In archaic Greece the rivalry among craftsmen who work with the same materials and the same techniques was very harsh. 1 I delivered lectures on the education of ancient Greek artists in the University of Pavia in March, 2007 as well as at Saint-Petersburg, in the Bibliotheca Classica, in September, 2007. I thank Prof. Harari, who invited me to deliver my lecture in Pavia, as well as Profs. Kazansky, Gavrilov, Verlinsky, who encouraged me to talk about the results of my research in Saint-Petersburg. About workshops in ancient Greece, see S. Nolte, Steinbruch – Werkstatt – Skulptur (Göttingen 2006) 9–303 who cites the most important previous bibliography. About workshops of painters see A. Anguissola, “La bottega dell’artista”, in: C. Gallazzi and S. Settis (eds.), Le tre vite del Papiro di Artemidoro (Milan 2006) 124–131 with relevant previous bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCATING El GRECO in LATE SIXTEENTH-CENTURY
    View metadata, citation and similarbroughtCORE papers to you at by core.ac.uk provided by Online Repository of Birkbeck Institutional Theses LOCATING El GRECO IN LATE SIXTEENTH‐CENTURY ROME: ART and LEARNING, RIVALRY and PATRONAGE Ioanna Goniotaki Department of History of Art, School of Arts Birkbeck College, University of London Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, July 2017 -1- Signed declaration I declare that the work presented in the thesis is my own Ioanna Goniotaki -2- ABSTRACT Much has been written about the artistic output of Domenicos Theotocopoulos during his time in Spain, but few scholars have examined his works in Venice and even fewer have looked at the years he spent in Rome. This may be in part attributed to the lack of firm documentary evidence regarding his activities there and to the small corpus of works that survive from his Italian period, many of which are furthermore controversial. The present study focuses on Domenicos’ Roman years and questions the traditional notion that he was a spiritual painter who served the principles of the Counter Reformation. To support such a view I have looked critically at the Counter Reformation, which I consider more as an amalgam of diverse and competitive institutions and less as an austere movement that strangled the freedom of artistic expression. I contend, moreover, that Domenicos’ acquaintance with Cardinal Alessandro Farnese’s librarian, Fulvio Orsini, was seminal for the artist, not only because it brought him into closer contact with Rome’s most refined circles, but principally because it helped Domenicos to assume the persona of ‘pictor doctus’, the learned artist, following the example of another of Fulvio’s friends, Pirro Ligorio.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/26/2021 12:20:17AM Via Free Access Appendix 2 Disquisition on the Art of the Ancients
    Appendix 2 Uytbreyding over de schilderkonst der ouden Original Text Vroegste ontwikkelingen1 31 Indien wy de geheele Historie der Schilderkunst wilden ophaalen, dienden wy op te klimmen tot aan Adam, en al geduuriglijk neerwaards te loopen zoeken door de gan- sche Oudheyt: doch by gebrek van Wegwyzers zal men de Reys van een bekender plaats 32 voortzetten, en die plaats oordeelen wy Griekenlant te zijn, | of schoon er veel schijn is om te vermoeden dat de Egyptenaaren die Konst, gelijk als meer andere Konsten en Wetenschappen, vroeger hebben bezêten als de Grieken. Het is ons ongeraaden dat landverschil te beslissen door een beslechtent vonnis, te meer daar dat verschil maar is gesticht op ses duyzent jaaren, die Egypten voorgeeft ouder te zijn in de vinding der Schilderkonst; een getal maklijk te noemen, doch moeijelijk te bewyzen. Het is zeker dat de Nyldrinkers de aldereerste uytvinders zijn geweest van de Starrenkunde, in dien niet van de Schilderkonst, ook was hun Koning Belus den verzinner van het stokken- gevecht, een Krygsoefening waar in de Britten uytmunten, en eenige andere Natien, gelijk als zy noch dagelijks met bebloede koppen komen te bewijzen. De meeste groo- te Grieksche Wysgeeren trokken wel na Egypten, doch zo het ons voorkomt, min om te schilderen, dan om te studeeren, gelyk als wy konnen bewaarheyden met Thales, Pythagoras, Demokritus, Plato, en meer andere Filosoofen; of er nu eenige Schilders of Konstenaaren onder dien troep zich bevonden, konnen wy niet beëedigen. Altoos wy weeten, of ten minsten wy gelooven, dat de Schilderkonst zich eerst heeft neergezet te Korinthen, of te Sicyone, op wiens puynhoopen de Turken een steedje hebben gesticht genaamt Vasilica.
    [Show full text]