A Psychological Thriller in Donna Tartt's the Goldfinch Abu Fanani
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A Psychological Thriller in Donna Tartt’s the Goldfinch Abu Fanani (A Lecturer In Faculty of Adab and Humanities UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya) Abstract In this article, the researcher analyzes a psychological thriller in the form of anxiety in Donna Tartt’s the Goldfinch . The researcher then uses psychological theory. The researcher analyzes the main character that undergoes a psychological worry; anxiety. At last, the researcher draws conclusion that the main character, Theodore Decker undergoes recurrent recollection(s), feeling humiliated, worry, fear, nightmares, and feelings of terror. Key Words : anxiety, feeling humiliated, worry, fear, nightmares, feelings of terror. Introduction Literature and society remain inseparable in that their existence influences each other; on one hand, literature affects society. On the other hand, society affects literature. Levin (Scott, 1962:126) states that literature and society are mutually connected. Both affect each other in that society gets the literature’s effect, on the other hand, literature gets the society’s effect. Similar to this statement, Olsen (1978:203-204) has the idea of the influence of literature to society as well as of society to literature. The researcher may well, as to the influence of literature to society, refer to a work by Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle’s Tom’s Cabin or Life among the Lowly influences the society to be social emancipation, to abolish racial discrimination between black and white people (Hardjana, 1981:70-71). English philosophers and poets are said to have influenced such worriers as social reformation and economic laws, instead (Jost, 1974:53-54). As to the influence of society to literature, the researcher takes a look at the works by Graham Greene’s the Heart of the Matter , which, as Gardiner has stated, has been unfairly punished in many years as being realistic in a negative meaning (Gardiner, 1959:86), Charles dickens’ (Jost, 1974:77); Oliver Twist , as Edgar Johnson, Professor of English, says, is a protest against fierce society (Dickens, 1961), Our Mutual Friend presents a disturbing vision of Victorian society (Dickens, 1997), Thackeray’s (Jost, 1974:77), George Eliot’s (Jost, 1974:77); Daniel Deronde is an analysis of contemporary Victorian society (Eliot, 1970:07), Daniel Defoe’s, Richardson’s, Cervantes’, and Pushkin’s (Jost, 1974:27). Likewise, such works as Mole Flanders, Clarissa, Don Quixote, and Evgeny Onegin are the products of the society (Jost, 1974:27). Azab dan Sengsara, Siti Nurbaya, Pertemuan, Salah Asuhan, Katak Hendak Menjadi Lembu, Atheis, Belenggu, and Senja di Jakarta are influenced by society, too (Hardjana, 1981:71). Further, in line with the influence of society to literature, Little (1966:01) says that this can happen due to the fact that the people’s literature becomes the fundamental element of its culture which contains the information of the society’s value, their worriers and conflicts, briefly, their entire way of life. Andre Hardjana (1981) confirms Little’s statement by saying that in a Sociology of Literature, the fictional characters are similar to/representative of real characters in certain real society. He says that social worriers give ideas to the novel through the author’s reachable imagination. He then says that a great novel is reinterpretation of the social problems; history and social experience through the author’s imagination in the society in which he lives. Thus, a fictitious character is not really imaginative. It represents a reality. Williams (1977:51) says that not all fictions are imaginative. According to Victor Zhirmunski, literature in all its parts is basically a creation of society. Literary movement in general and literary facts in particular regarded as international phenomena, are to some extent based on comparably historical development in the social life of the particular peoples, and to some extent on the mutual cultural and literary interaction between them (Jost, 1974:27). Miner (1990:30) says that regarding the fictional work such as the Tale of Genji , the novel gives us features of true emperor that match with unreal heroes and heroines, and the unreal persona put on real clothes, have real worries and have faith in real things of that era, i.e., spirit possession. He also says that even though a literary work is a fictional one, it cannot be said that it is fictional because if it is, then, the readers won’t manage to understand it. Gardiner (1959) in his book Norms for the Novel talks of author who cannot get rid of the fact of life. He calls him a realistic author. He says that the realistic author is one whose data come from the true life about him and are formed into his story, into his work of art. In this case, he puts his own subjective ideas and opinions as well as a little intrusion and influence. As to the fictional character, he says that the author is to possess the truth about him and tells sufficiently about him. Whether or not this is sufficient is going to be ascertained by lots of things; by the author’s notion of what sort of character he is, by his surrounding in society, by his friends and comrades, by his works, and on and so forth. His confirmation of the influence of society to literature is concluded by alluding to the Naturalists that they comment nothing of the society unless in the most negative meaning. Wellek (1963:94) says that literature symbolizes life which becomes a social fact although the outside world as well as the subjective world of the individual has become targets of the literary imitation. In contrast to the above opinions that real society influences literature, Williams (1977) in his book Marxism and Literature says that literature indeed gets influenced from society. Yet, society is seen fundamentally general and not concrete of human life in that it is the general social practice, the class specialization as well as the class limitation that influence it. In a nutshell, the researcher insists that Madame de Stael’s words be worth mentioning here that literature that is made by the nation should refer to society’s way of thinking because society has a sort of brilliant ideas (Jost, 1974:70) whether or not the society is abstract. Thus, literature and society are bound together. Where there is a society, there is a literature and vice versa. It is because an author is a member of a certain society that gives ideas to his works. To this statement, Damono (2009:01) (2009:01) says that an author is inevitably a social member who is attached to a certain social group. Such a certain social group maintains education, religious practice, culture and all existing social institution. One of the existing social institutions is literature which uses language as its medium. Language then is a social creativity. Further, literature presents a picture of life which is a reality in society in that it involves relations among society, relation between society and personalities, relation among people, and among events in human’s feeling. As to Damono’s opinion, Hardjana (1981:71) agrees that an author lives in a society. He can’t avoid of its influence because there is an enforcement of social norms. Consequently, such enforced social norms inevitably give ideas to the author in his works. Further, He says that literary work doesn’t come from the social vacuum. It, further, is an author’s imagination which has been influenced by the society in which he lives. All experts mentioned above like, Little, Hardjana and Williams with their similar representation of real character in a work of art, Gardiner with his idea of the realistic author, Victor Zhirmunski with his opinion of literature to be creation of society, Earl Miner with his idea of fiction becoming reality due to the readers’ ability to comprehend, the characters having real worries as those in reality, and Renne Wellek with his idea of life-symbolizing literature, Damono (and also Hardjana) with the idea that an author belongs to a society confirm that society gives ideas to literary works. All of the aforesaid connection of literature and society above, Miner’s idea of the characters having real worriers arrests the researcher, one of which is found in the novels of Donna Tart, The Goldfinch . The main character undergoes psychological problems such as nightmares, recollection, etc. Further, Theodore Decker, the main character undergoes anxiety after some events he did in the past; stealing a painting, the goldfinch, and other odds and ends which become the problems of his future. Consequently, the researcher raises such a condition into a paper with the title of A Psychological Thriller in Donna Tartt’s the Goldfinch, whilst, such a psychological thriller refers to the posttraumatic stress disorder which is in the form of anxiety disorder. Methodology Because the researcher analyzes the main character psychologically, he researcher, therefore, delineates the use of psychology in literature below. The psychological approach used by I.A. Richards in Principle of Literary Criticism began to appear in the twentieth century. In this approach, he relates the literary study with psychology (1926). Presumably, the flourishing use of psychology in literary criticism began with Conrad Aiken’s Skepticism: Notes on Contemporary Poetry (Scott, 1962:70). However, the impact of psychology upon creative literature was strengthened by the additional influence of Adler’s concept of the inferiority complex, and Jung’s theory of the collective unconscious (Scott, 1962:70). Therefore, psychology enters the literary study through some ways; one of them is that literary work also contains psychological proposition (Wellek, 1962). In general, the application of psychological knowledge to art can generate three kinds of illustration and one of which is that psychology can be used to explain fictitious characters (Scott, 1962:71-72).