Editor's Note
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Editors Note IT was with a modicum of hope and guarded optimism Scrooge-like fashion, offered the sop of timely that representatives of the least developed countries implementation of the WTO decision. (LDCs) along with their counterparts from the Clearly, it was a crushing disappointment as it was developed and developing countries, international evident that the rich countries were not prepared to move agencies and civil society convened in Istanbul on 9-13 beyond the status quo. Some UN officials tried to put a May for the Fourth United Nations Conference on the positive spin on the outcome, but civil society groups LDCs (LDC-IV). under the umbrella of the LDC Civil Society Forum were In attending this decennial event, these dismissive of the Istanbul Programme of Action for representatives from 48 of the poorest countries in the failing to live up to the mandate agreed ahead of the world had legitimate expectations that the rich countries conference. Worse still, the rich countries had tried to would take some decisive steps in the implementation of present South-South cooperation as being substantial the Brussels Programme of Action for the LDCs for enough to absolve them of additional commitments to 2001-2010. The aim of the latter programme, which was support the LDCs. adopted by LDC-III, is to make substantial progress In addition to the failure to commit additional toward halving the proportion of people living in extreme finances for the LDCs, significant civil society poverty and suffering from hunger by 2015 and promote criticism is levelled against the rich countries over their the sustainable development of the LDCs. The Istanbul ideological bias in their approach to enhancing productive conference was convened with the aim of assessing the capacity in the LDCs. While the civil society groups fully results of the Brussels Programme and adopting new endorse the need to boost productive capacity, they measures and strategies for the sustainable development charge that the Istanbul Programme of Action relies of the LDCs into 2020. heavily on economic liberalisation repackaged in new Apart from their Brussels commitments, there was ways. Specifically, market-led approaches have been also a moral imperative for the rich countries to respond replaced by private sector-led approaches. While generously to the plight of the over 800 million people accepting that the private sector can play a useful role, living in the LDCs. For it is the financial and trade policies they contend, on the basis of previous experiences of of these rich countries that in recent years have pushed these countries, that the goal of sustainable development millions of these people even deeper into poverty. Taking with equity cannot be realised by relying on the private a longer-term view, the economic policies of the sector and the market alone. Calling for a clear rejection developed countries and the export-led development of the Washington Consensus, they advocate instead model they promoted among the LDCs surely contributed participative national development strategies that focus in a significant way to the fact that the number of LDCs on each countrys vision and core strengths. has almost doubled from 25 to 48 in the last four decades. However, while stressing the need for such people- To spur the developed countries to make the centred approaches to development as the real alternative, necessary commitments to realise the Brussels goal, UN the civil society groups are also mindful of the need for Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at the opening of the an effective follow-up strategy to LDC-IV to ensure Istanbul conference made an impassioned plea for a results and delivery on the commitments by the developed comprehensive and ambitious Programme of Action for countries. In short, disappointing as the Istanbul sustained economic growth in the LDCs. In the event, Programme of Action is, it is essential to hold the rich the new Programme of Action that emerged from the countries to account on the pledges they have made, weak conclusion of the conference on 13 May was anything as these are. but comprehensive and ambitious. Our cover story for this issue focuses on the UN The LDC leaders came to Istanbul expecting a LDC-IV conference. While providing a broad analysis significant increase in official development aid. To their of its disappointing outcome, we specially highlight the disappointment, the Istanbul Programme of Action criticism by the non-governmental organisations (NGOs) merely stated that those countries already providing more of the Istanbul Programme of Action. Taking up civil than 0.20% of their gross national product (GNP) as aid societys concern about the repackaging of economic to LDCs will continue to do so; those which have met liberalisation in the Programme of Action, we also carry the 0.15% target will undertake to reach 0.20%; and others a report on a high-level thematic debate at the conference which have committed themselves to the 0.15% target where the related policy of trade liberalisation came under will either achieve the target by 2015 or try their best to fire. Finally, as part of the discussion of alternatives, we do so. publish an African view on the need to revisit the concept But more than aid, it was the outcome on trade of the developmental state. that was to prove the most bitter pill to swallow. There had been expectation that the Istanbul conference would result in an advance over a 2005 World Trade Organisation (WTO) decision obliging rich countries to give duty-free status for at least 97% of LDC exports. The hope was The Editors that this duty-free status could be extended to all LDC Visit the Third World Network Internet website at: products, i.e., 100%. Instead, the developed countries, in www.twnside.org.sg THIRD WORLD RESURGENCE No 249 Third World RESURGENCE www.twnside.org.sg No 249 May 11 ISSN 0128-357X UN Photo/Evan Schneider The Fourth UN Conference on the Least Developed Countries (pic), which was held in Istanbul on 9-13 May, produced disappointingly little in the way of commitments to support the worlds poorest nations. 8 ECOLOGY Istanbul Declaration, no new WOMEN aid pledged Sanya Smith 2 Its time to listen to nature 13 Trade liberalisation criticised 37 Stateless refugee mothers fall Pablo Solón in LDC Conference panel through the cracks in Bangla- 3 Controversial dams approved Sanya Smith desh Misha Hussain in Patagonia, Chile 18 South-South axis strengthens 39 South Africa: Womens issues Sanjay Suri missing from election manifes- CLIMATE CHANGE 19 Our voices have not been tos Zukiswa Zimela heard... 4 Neck deep in the Big Muddy 23 The rural roots of poverty and VIEWPOINT Glenn Scherer hunger in LDCs Johannes Reichert ECONOMICS 25 The African state must be 40 Marriage of novelty with back in the saddle Cornelius nostalgia Jeremy Seabrook 5 Egypt should not take a new Adedze IMF loan Rick Rowden MEDIA WORLD AFFAIRS COVER 42 Media complicit in rise of 27 No exit: Yemens existential xenophobia in Europe Rich countries fail the crisis Sheila Carapico Zoltán Dujisin worlds poorest 32 The Nakba protests: A taste of the future Jonathan Cook POETRY 8 Helping the worlds poorest 34 Narco violence in Mexico: countries Martin Khor Eight theses and many ques- 44 Gitanjali 55 Rabindranath 10 LDC Conference adopts tions Paco Ignacio Taibo II Tagore THIRD WORLD RESURGENCE is pub- THIRD WORLD RESURGENCE is pub- Publisher and Chief Editor: S.M. lished by the Third World Network, an in- lished monthly by Third World Network, 131 Mohamed Idris; Managing Editor: Chee ternational network of groups and individu- Jalan Macalister, 10400 Penang, Malaysia. Yoke Ling; Editors: T Rajamoorthy, als involved in efforts to bring about a Tel: 60-4-2266728 Fax: 60-4-2264505. Evelyne Hong, Lean Ka-Min; Contribut- greater articulation of the needs and rights Email: [email protected] ing Editors: Roberto Bissio (Uruguay), of peoples in the Third World; a fair distri- Printed by Jutaprint, No. 2, Solok Sungai Charles Abugre (Ghana); Staff: Linda Ooi bution of world resources; and forms of de- Pinang 3, 11600 Penang, Malaysia. (Design), Lim Jee Yuan (Art Consultant), velopment which are ecologically sustain- Cover Design: Lim Jee Yuan Lim Beng Tuan (Marketing), Yap Bing Nyi able and fulfil human needs. Copyright © Third World Network (Editorial) THIRD WORLD RESURGENCE No 249 1 E C O L O G Y Its time to listen to nature Why should we only respect the laws of human beings and not those of nature, asks Bolivias UN representative Pablo Solón? VICTOR Hugo, the author of Les vironmental goods. Misérables, once wrote: How sad Humanity finds itself at a to think that nature speaks and crossroads: Why should we only mankind doesnt listen. respect the laws of human beings We are here today to attempt and not those of nature? Why do to have a dialogue not just among we call the person who kills his states, but also with nature. Al- neighbour a criminal, but not he though we often forget it, human who extinguishes a species or con- beings are a force in nature. In re- taminates a river? Why do we ality, we are all a product of the judge the life of human beings with same Big Bang that created the uni- parameters different from those verse, although some only see that guide the life of the system as wood for the fire when they walk a whole if all of us, absolutely all through the forest. of us, rely on the life of the Earth These three questions are the System? point of departure for our discus- Is there no contradiction in sion today: recognising only the rights of the First, what is nature? Is it a human part of this system while all thing, a source of resources, a sys- the rest of the system is reduced to tem, a home, a community of liv- a source of resources and raw ma- ing and interdependent beings? terials in other words, a business Second, are there rules in na- opportunity? ture? Are there natural laws that Nature cannot be submitted to the will of the To speak of equilibrium is to govern its integrity, interrelation- laboratory.