DOCSLIB.ORG

FAMILY Achiridae Rafinesque, 1815 - American Soles [=Aghirini, Achiria, Gymnachirinae, Apionichthyinae, Trinectinae] Notes: Aghirini Rafinesque, 1810B:13 [Ref

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FAMILY Achiridae Rafinesque, 1815 - American Soles [=Aghirini, Achiria, Gymnachirinae, Apionichthyinae, Trinectinae] Notes: Aghirini Rafinesque, 1810B:13 [Ref FAMILY Achiridae Rafinesque, 1815 - American soles [=Aghirini, Achiria, Gymnachirinae, Apionichthyinae, Trinectinae] Notes: Aghirini Rafinesque, 1810b:13 [ref. 3595] (ordine) ? Achirus [genus inferrable from the stem?; published not in latinized form before 1900; not available, Article 11.7.2] Achiria Rafinesque, 1815:83 [ref. 3584] (subfamily) Achirus Gymnachirinae Jordan, 1923b:3, 4 [ref. 10539] (subfamily) Gymnachirus Apionichthyinae Jordan, 1923b:4, 11 [ref. 10539] (subfamily) Apionichthys Trinectinae Chabanaud, 1930b:265 [ref. 32640] (subfamily) Trinectes GENUS Achirus Lacepede, 1802 - American soles [=Achirus Lacepède [B. G. E.], 1802:658, Anathyridium (subgenus of Baeostoma) Chabanaud [P.], 1928:21, Baiostoma Bean [T. H.], in Goode & Bean, 1882:413, Grammichthys Kaup [J. J.], 1858:101] Notes: [ref. 4929]. Masc. Pleuronectes achirus Linnaeus, 1758. Type by absolute tautonymy. Pleuronectes achirus Linnaeus was treated in the synonymy of Achirus fasciatus Lacepède, 1802, but apparently fasciatus Lacepède is not the same as achirus Linnaeus and belongs in the genus Trinectes. •Valid as Achirus Lacepède, 1802 -- (Robins et al. 1980:65 [ref. 7111], Lea et al. 1989:239 [ref. 21534], Allen 1991:205 [ref. 21090], Castro-Aguirre et al. 1999:492 [ref. 24550], Munroe 2003:1927 [ref. 27118], Ramos in Reis et al. 2003:667 [ref. 27061], Ramos et al. 2009:55 [ref. 30194]). Current status: Valid as Achirus Lacepède, 1802. Achiridae. (Anathyridium) [ref. 783]. Neut. Solea gronovii Günther, 1862. Type by subsequent designation. Baeostoma is an unjustified emendation of Baiostoma. Type designated by Myers 1929:37 [ref. 20930] which makes Anathyuridium an absolute synonym of Baiostoma. •Synonym of Achirus Lacepède, 1802. Current status: Synonym of Achirus Lacepède, 1802. Achiridae. (Baiostoma) [ref. 1840]. Neut. Baiostoma brachialis Bean, 1882. Type by monotypy. Baeostoma Jordan & Gilbert, 1883:965 [ref. 2476] and Chabanaud 1928:19 [ref. 783] are unjustified emendations. •Synonym of Achirus Lacepède, 1802 -- (Castro-Aguirre et al. 1999:492 [ref. 24550]). Current status: Synonym of Achirus Lacepède, 1802. Achiridae. (Grammichthys) [ref. 2578]. Masc. Pleuronectes lineatus Linnaeus, 1758. Type by monotypy. •Synonym of Achirus Lacepède, 1802. Current status: Synonym of Achirus Lacepède, 1802. Achiridae. Species Achirus achirus (Linnaeus, 1758) - drab sole [=Pleuronectes achirus Linnaeus [C.], 1758:268, Achirus maculipinnis gunteri Chabanaud [P.], 1940:90, Monochir punctifer Castelnau [F. L.], 1855:80, Pl. 41 (fig. 3)] Notes: [Systema Naturae, Ed. X v. 1; ref. 2787] Suriname. Current status: Valid as Achirus achirus (Linnaeus, 1758). Achiridae. Distribution: Off South America; probably Venezuela to northeastern Brazil. Habitat: freshwater, brackish, marine. (gunteri) [Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Série 2) v. 12 (no. 2); ref. 13166] Matagorda Island, Texas, U.S.A. Current status: Synonym of Achirus achirus (Linnaeus, 1758). Achiridae. Habitat: freshwater, brackish, marine. (punctifer) [Animaux nouveaux or rares v. 2; ref. 766] Brazil. Current status: Synonym of Achirus achirus (Linnaeus, 1758). Achiridae. Habitat: freshwater, brackish, marine. Species Achirus declivis Chabanaud, 1940 - plainfin sole [=Achirus achirus declivis Chabanaud [P.], 1940:89] Notes: [Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Série 2) v. 12 (no. 2); ref. 13166] Gulf of Paria, between Trinidad Island, West Indies and Venezuela. Current status: Valid as Achirus declivis Chabanaud, 1940. Achiridae. Distribution: Western Atlantic. Habitat: freshwater, brackish, marine. Species Achirus klunzingeri (Steindachner, 1880) - brown sole [=Solea klunzingeri Steindachner [F.], 1880:96 [44], Pl. 9 (fig. 3)] Notes: [Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe. v. 42; ref. 14403] Guayaquil, Ecuador. Current status: Valid as Achirus klunzingeri (Steindachner, 1880). Achiridae. Distribution: Eastern central Pacific. Habitat: marine. Species Achirus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758) - lined sole [=Pleuronectes lineatus Linnaeus [C.], 1758:268, Monochirus lineatus Quoy [J. R. C.] & Gaimard [J. P.], 1824:238, Baiostoma brachialis Bean [T. H.], in Goode & Bean, 1882:413, Achirus (Baeostoma) comifer Jordan [D. S.] & Gilbert [C. H.], 1884:31, Pleuronectes nigricans Bloch [M. E.] & Schneider [J. G.], 1801:158] Notes: [Systema Naturae, Ed. X v. 1; ref. 2787] America. Current status: Valid as Achirus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Achiridae. Distribution: Western Atlantic. Habitat: brackish, marine. (lineatus) [Voyage autour du monde; ref. 3574] Rio de Janeiro Bay, Brazil. Current status: Synonym of Achirus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Achiridae. Distribution: Western Atlantic. Habitat: freshwater, brackish, marine. (brachialis) [Proceedings of the United States National Museum v. 5 (no. 297); ref. 1840] Appalachicola Bay, Florida; southern Florida, U.S.A. Current status: Synonym of Achirus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Achiridae. Habitat: brackish, marine. (comifer) [Proceedings of the United States National Museum v. 7 (no. 402); ref. 12325] Key West, Florida, U.S.A. Current status: Synonym of Achirus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Achiridae. Habitat: brackish, marine. (nigricans) [M. E. Blochii, Systema Ichthyologiae; ref. 471] Coast of South America. Current status: Synonym of Achirus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Achiridae. Habitat: brackish, marine. Species Achirus mazatlanus (Steindachner, 1869) - Mazatlan sole [=Solea mazatlana Steindachner [F.], 1869:149, Achirus barnharti Jordan [D. S.], 1923:10, Pl. 1] Notes: [Anzeiger der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien v. 6 (no. 19); ref. 20467] Mazatlán, Sinaloa, western Mexico. Current status: Valid as Achirus mazatlanus (Steindachner, 1869). Achiridae. Distribution: Eastern Pacific: Baja California to Peru. Habitat: freshwater, brackish, marine. (barnharti) [University of California Publications in Zoology v. 26 (no. 1); ref. 10539] Off Islas Coronados, Pacific side of Baja Califormia (Norte), Mexico, depth 400 feet. Current status: Synonym of Achirus mazatlanus (Steindachner, 1869). Achiridae. Habitat: freshwater, brackish, marine. Species Achirus mucuri Ramos et al., 2009 - American sole [=Achirus mucuri Ramos [R. T. C.], Ramos [T. P. A.] & Lopes [P. R. D.], 2009:56, Figs. 1, 2a, 2c, 3a-b, d-e, j, l] Notes: [Zootaxa No. 2113; ref. 30194] Esturary of the Macuri River at Mucuri, ca. 18°05'15"S, 39°33'53"W, Bahia, Brazil. Current status: Valid as Achirus mucuri Ramos, Ramos & Lopes, 2009. Achiridae. Distribution: Mucuri River estuary, Bahia, Brazil. Habitat: brackish. Species Achirus novoae Cervigon, 1982 - Cervigon's sole [=Achirus novoae Cervigón [F.], 1982:243, Fig. 20] Notes: [Los recursos pesqueros del Rio Orinoco y su explotacion; ref. 20509] La Lagunita Lake, near Bolívar, Bolívar State, Venezuela. Current status: Valid as Achirus novoae Cervigón, 1982. Achiridae. Distribution: Orinoco River basin: Colombia and Venezuela; Trinidad & Tobago. Habitat: freshwater. Species Achirus scutum (Gunther, 1862) - network sole [=Solea scutum Günther [A.], 1862:474] Notes: [Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum v. 4; ref. 1969] Pacific coast of Central America. Current status: Valid as Achirus scutum (Günther, 1862). Achiridae. Distribution: Eastern Pacific. Habitat: brackish, marine. Species Achirus zebrinus Clark, 1936 - Clark's sole [=Achirus zebrinus Clark [H. W.], 1936:386] Notes: [Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences (Series 4) v. 21 (no. 29); ref. 839] Gulf of Tehauntepec, Mexico, 15°40'N, 93°49'W. Current status: Valid as Achirus zebrinus Clark, 1936. Achiridae. Distribution: Pacific coast of Central America. Habitat: marine. GENUS Apionichthys Kaup, 1858 - American soles [=Apionichthys Kaup [J. J.], 1858:104, Achiropsis (subgenus of Solea) Steindachner [F.], 1876:158, Soleotalpa Günther [A.], 1862:489] Notes: [ref. 2578]. Masc. Apionichthys dumerili Kaup, 1858. Type by monotypy. Misspelled Aprinonichthys in 1990 edition of the "Genera". •Valid as Apionichthys Kaup, 1858 -- (Chapleau & Keast 1988:2799 [ref. 12625], Ramos 2003:100 [ref. 26762], Munroe 2003:1927 [ref. 27118], Ramos in Reis et al. 2003:667 [ref. 27061]). Current status: Valid as Apionichthys Kaup, 1858. Achiridae. (Achiropsis) [Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe v. 74 (1. Abth.); ref. 4225] Fem. Solea (Achiropsis) nattereri Steindachner, 1876. Type by monotypy. •Valid as Achiropsis Steindachner, 1876 -- (Ramos 2003:100 [ref. 26762], Ramos in Reis et al. 2003:667 [ref. 27061]). •Synonym of Apionichthys Kaup, 1858. Current status: Synonym of Apionichthys Kaup, 1858. Achiridae. (Soleotalpa) [ref. 1969]. Fem. Soleotalpa unicolor Günther, 1862. Type by monotypy. •Synonym of Apionichthys Kaup, 1858 -- (Ramos 2003:100 [ref. 26762], Ramos in Reis et al. 2003:667 [ref. 27061]). Current status: Synonym of Apionichthys Kaup, 1858. Achiridae. Species Apionichthys dumerli Kaup, 1858 - longtail sole [=Apionichthys dumerili Kaup [J. J.], 1858:104, Apionichthys bleekeri Horst [R.], 1878:31, Apionichthys nebulosus Peters [W. (C. H.)], 1869:709, Apionichthys ottonis Steindachner [F.], 1868:120, Soleotalpa unicolor Günther [A.], 1862:489] Notes: [Archiv für Naturgeschichte v. 24 (no. 1); ref. 2578] Current status: Valid as Apionichthys dumerili Kaup, 1858. Achiridae. Distribution: Widespread in South America. Habitat: freshwater, brackish. (bleekeri) [Tijdschrift der Nederlandsche Dierkundige Vereeniging v. 4; ref. 18311] Current status:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lista De Espécies a Serem Avaliadas No Processo De Avaliação Do Estado De Conservação Das Espécies Marinhas E Estuarinas D
    Lista de espécies a serem avaliadas no Processo de avaliação do estado de conservação das espécies marinhas e estuarinas da Classe Actinopterygii (peixes ósseos), entre agosto e setembro de 2011. Familia Belonidae Familia Congridae Ablennes hians Acromycter perturbator Belonian apodion Ariosoma anale Platybelone argalus Ariosoma balearicum Potamorraphis eigenmanni Ariosoma opistophthalmus Potamorraphis guianensis Ariosoma selenops Potamorraphis petersi Bassanago albescens Pseudotylosurus angusticeps Coloconger meadi Pseudotylosurus microps Conger orbignyannus Strongylura marina Conger triporiceps Strongylura timucu Gnathophis mystax Tylosurus acus Gnathophis sp. Tylosurus crocodiles Gorgasia inferomaculata Heteroconger camelopardalis Familia Hemiramphidae Heteroconger longissimus Hemiramphus balao "Leptocephalus " humbermariorum Hemiramphus brasiliensis Parabathymyrus oregoni Hyporhamphus kronei Paraconger guianensis Hyporhamphus roberti Rhechias bullisi Hyporhamphus unifasciatus Rhechias dubius Oxyporhamphus micropterus Rhechias vicinalis Euleptorhamphus velox Rhynchoconger flavus Xenomystax congroides Familia Synodontidae Bathysaurus ferox Familia Merluciidae Bathysaurus mollis Macruronus magellanicus Saurida brasiliensis Merluccius hubbsi Saurida caribbaea Synodus foetens Familia Phycidae Synodus intermedius Urophycis bralisiensis Synodus synodus Urophycis mystacea Trachynochephalus myops Familia Ophidiidae Familia Mugilidae Bassogigas gillii Mugil curema Bassozetus sp. Mugil curvidens Bathyonus laticeps Mugil incilis Benthocometes
    [Show full text]
  • Sidney Lazaro Martins
    Sistemas para a Transposição de Peixes Neotropicais Potamódromos ANEXO 3: PEIXES NEOTROPICAIS. 319 Sistemas para a Transposição de Peixes Neotropicais Potamódromos Não se intenciona e apresentar o universo com cerca de 3.000 espécies de peixes continentais neotropicais nacionais, ou seja, cerca de 1/4 das existentes, mas ilustrar as diversidades e as potencialidades econômicas, esportivas, turísticas e ambientais desses animais para ampliar a sua importância e fortificar as ações mitigadoras de impactos ambientais nos meios aquáticos, principalmente sobre os advindos do barramento de rios. Apresenta-se, também, quando disponível, os comprimentos (TL) das espécies, que podem ser úteis nos dimensionamentos dos sistemas para a transposição. Os nomes vulgares dos peixes não fornecem indicações técnicas das relações entre diversos grupos de peixes. Os zoólogos utilizam uma nomenclatura internacional que é constituída por nomes derivados do latim e do grego. Esses nomes podem parecer complicados e eruditos, mas são indispensáveis, para os especialistas, o domínio dessas designações científicas. De acordo com a convenção internacional, os nomes científicos devem ser impressos em itálico, sendo o gênero iniciado com maiúscula e a espécies em itálico minúsculo (quando a espécies é desconhecida atribui-se, sem itálico: spp quando há várias espécies e sp a uma espécie). A classificação internacional plena de uma Tainha será: Classe: Osteichthys; Subclasse: Actinopterygii; Ordem: Perciformes; Subordem: Mugiloidea; Família: Mugilidae; Gênero: Mugil; Espécie: brasiliensis ou de um Dourado fluvial será: Dourado fluvial: Super-ordem: Ostariophysi; Ordem: Chariformes; Família: Characidae; Sub-família: Salminus hilarii. Na convivência técnica local, a designação científica dos peixes consiste, geralmente, em duas partes: nome genérico escrito em itálico, com a inicial em maiúscula e o nome trivial escrito também em itálico com minúsculas, que designa apenas uma espécie dentro do gênero.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration Drives Rapid Phenotypic Evolution in Flatfishes
    Integration drives rapid phenotypic evolution in flatfishes Kory M. Evansa,1, Olivier Larouchea, Sara-Jane Watsonb, Stacy Farinac, María Laura Habeggerd, and Matt Friedmane,f aDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005; bDepartment of Biology, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801; cDepartment of Biology, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059; dDepartment of Biology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224; eDepartment of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and fDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited by Neil H. Shubin, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved March 19, 2021 (received for review January 21, 2021) Evolutionary innovations are scattered throughout the tree of life, organisms and is thought to facilitate morphological diversifica- and have allowed the organisms that possess them to occupy tion as different traits are able to fine-tune responses to different novel adaptive zones. While the impacts of these innovations are selective pressures (27–29). Conversely, integration refers to a well documented, much less is known about how these innova- pattern whereby different traits exhibit a high degree of covaria- tions arise in the first place. Patterns of covariation among traits tion (21, 30). Patterns of integration may be the result of pleiot- across macroevolutionary time can offer insights into the gener- ropy or functional coupling (28, 30–33). There is less of a ation of innovation. However, to date, there is no consensus on consensus on the macroevolutionary implications of phenotypic the role that trait covariation plays in this process. The evolution integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Maldonado-Ocampo, Javier A.; Vari, Richard P.; Saulo Usma, José Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia Biota Colombiana, vol. 9, núm. 2, 2008, pp. 143-237 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49120960001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Biota Colombiana 9 (2) 143 - 237, 2008 Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia Javier A. Maldonado-Ocampo1; Richard P. Vari2; José Saulo Usma3 1 Investigador Asociado, curador encargado colección de peces de agua dulce, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Claustro de San Agustín, Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia. Dirección actual: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, Departamento de Vertebrados, Quinta da Boa Vista, 20940- 040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. [email protected] 2 Division of Fishes, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, MRC--159, National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013—7012. [email protected] 3 Coordinador Programa Ecosistemas de Agua Dulce WWF Colombia. Calle 61 No 3 A 26, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. [email protected] Abstract Data derived from the literature supplemented by examination of specimens in collections show that 1435 species of native fishes live in the freshwaters of Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Characterization of the Tampa Bay Watershed
    Biological Report 90(20) December 1990 An Ecological Characterization of the Tampa Bay Watershed Fish and Wildlife Service and Minerals Management Service u.s. Department of the Interior Chapter 6. Fauna N. Scott Schomer and Paul Johnson 6.1 Introduction on each species, as well as the limited scope.of this document, often excludes such information from our Generally speaking, animal species utilize only a discussion. Where possible, references to more limited number of habitats within a restricted geo­ detailed infonnation on local fish and wildlife condi­ graphic range. Factors that regulate habitat use and tions are included. geographic range include the behavior, physiology, and anatomy ofthe species; competitive, trophic, and 6.2 Invertebrates symbiotic interactions with other species; and forces that influence species dispersion. Such restrictions may be broad, as in the ca.<re of the common crow, 6.2.1 Freshwater Invertebrates which prospers in a wide variety of settings over a Data on freshwater invertebrate communities in va.')t geographic area; or narrow as in the case of the the Tampa Bay area are reported by Cowen et a1. mangrove terrapin, which is found in only one habitat (1974) in the lower Hillsborough River, Cowell et aI. and only in the near tropics of the western hemi­ (1975) in Lake Thonotosassa; Dames and Moore sphere. Knowledge of animal-species occurrence (1975) in the Alafia and Little Manatee Rivers; and within habitat') is fundamental to understanding and Ross and Jones (1979) at numerous locations within managing
    [Show full text]
  • Felipe Skóra Neto
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ FELIPE SKÓRA NETO OBRAS DE INFRAESTRUTURA HIDROLÓGICA E INVASÕES DE PEIXES DE ÁGUA DOCE NA REGIÃO NEOTROPICAL: IMPLICAÇÕES PARA HOMOGENEIZAÇÃO BIÓTICA E HIPÓTESE DE NATURALIZAÇÃO DE DARWIN CURITIBA 2013 FELIPE SKÓRA NETO OBRAS DE INFRAESTRUTURA HIDROLÓGICA E INVASÕES DE PEIXES DE ÁGUA DOCE NA REGIÃO NEOTROPICAL: IMPLICAÇÕES PARA HOMOGENEIZAÇÃO BIÓTICA E HIPÓTESE DE NATURALIZAÇÃO DE DARWIN Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial à obtenção do grau de Mestre em Ecologia e Conservação, no Curso de Pós- Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná. Orientador: Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule Co-orientador: Vinícius Abilhoa CURITIBA 2013 Dedico este trabalho a todas as pessoas que foram meu suporte, meu refúgio e minha fortaleza ao longo dos períodos da minha vida. Aos meus pais Eugênio e Nilte, por sempre acreditarem no meu sonho de ser cientista e me darem total apoio para seguir uma carreira que poucas pessoas desejam trilhar. Além de todo o suporte intelectual e espiritual e financeiro para chegar até aqui, caminhando pelas próprias pernas. Aos meus avós: Cândida e Felippe, pela doçura e horas de paciência que me acolherem em seus braços durante a minha infância, pelas horas que dispenderem ao ficarem lendo livros comigo e por sempre serem meu refúgio. Você foi cedo demais, queria que estivesse aqui para ver esta conquista e principalmente ver o meu maior prêmio, que é minha filha. Saudades. A minha esposa Carine, que tem em comum a mesma profissão o que permitiu que entendesse as longas horas sentadas a frente de livros e do computador, a sua confiança e carinho nas minhas horas de cansaço, você é meu suporte e meu refúgio.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of Uruguay (CLOFF-UY)
    Ichthyological Contributions of PecesCriollos 28: 1-40 (2014) 1 Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of Uruguay (CLOFF-UY). Thomas O. Litz1 & Stefan Koerber2 1 Friedhofstr. 8, 88448 Attenweiler, Germany, [email protected] 2 Friesenstr. 11, 45476 Muelheim, Germany, [email protected] Introduction The purpose of this paper to present the first complete list of freshwater fishes from Uruguay based on the available literature. It would have been impossible to review al papers from the beginning of ichthyology, starting with authors as far back as Larrañaga or Jenyns, who worked the preserved fishes Darwin brought back home from his famous trip around the world. The publications of Nion et al. (2002) and Teixera de Mello et al. (2011) seemed to be a good basis where to start from. Both are not perfect for this purpose but still valuable sources and we highly recommend both as literature for the interested reader. Nion et al. (2002) published a list of both, the freshwater and marine species of Uruguay, only permitting the already knowledgeable to make the difference and recognize the freshwater fishes. Also, some time has passed since then and the systematic of this paper is outdated in many parts. Teixero de Mello et al. (2011) recently presented an excellent collection of the 100 most abundant species with all relevant information and colour pictures, allowing an easy approximate identification. The names used there are the ones currently considered valid. Uncountable papers have been published on the freshwater fishes of Uruguay, some with regional or local approaches, others treating with certain groups of fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic Resource Partitioning Among Five Flatfish Species (Actinopterygii
    Journal of Fish Biology (2008) 72, 1035–1054 doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01788.x, available online at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com Trophicresourcepartitioningamongfiveflatfish species (Actinopterygii, Pleuronectiformes) in a tropical bay in south-eastern Brazil A. P. P. GUEDES AND F. G. ARAUJO´ * Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Laborato´rio de Ecologia de Peixes, Km 47, Antiga Rodovia Rio – Sao˜ Paulo, 23851-970, Seropedica, RJ, Brazil (Received 13 February 2007, Accepted 22 November 2007) Five species of flatfishes in a tropical bay in south-eastern Brazil were studied to test the hypothesis that resource partitioning along the spatial and size dimensions has been used as a mechanism to enable coexistence. Three zones in the study area were defined according to environmental characteristics (inner, middle and outer). Sampling was conducted by otter trawl tows during daylight hours, between October 1998 and September 1999. Achiridae species (Achirus lineatus and Trinectes paulistanus) showed narrow niche width, indicating a specialized feeding strategy, preying on Polychaeta, and occurring mainly in the inner bay zone. Paralichthyidae (Citharichthys spilopterus and Etropus crossotus) and the Cynoglossidae (Symphurus tessellatus) showed broad niche width and a generalized feeding strategy preying on a large number of Crustacea. Symphurus tessellatus did not change diet with size-dimension feeding on Amphipoda and Polychaeta, whereas C. spilopterus and E. crossotus shifted diet with growth. Citharichthys spilopterus fed mainly on Mysida and secondarily on shrimps, with juvenile preying on large amounts of Calanoida, whereas adults consumed large amounts of fishes. Isaeidae amphipods were a significant prey for both small and large E.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of the Diet Composition and Its Relation To
    Neotropical Ichthyology Original article https://doi.org/10.1590/110.1590/1982-0224-2019-0059 Comparative analysis of the diet composition and its relation to morphological characteristics in Achirus mazatlanus and Syacium ovale (Pleuronectiformes: Osteichthyes) from a Mexican Pacific coastal lagoon Sandra Carolina Padilla-Gutierrez1,2, Gaspar González-Sansón1,3 Correspondence: , 1,3 Gaspar González-Sansón Consuelo María Aguilar-Betancourt and Juan Ramón Flores- 4 [email protected] Ortega The purpose of this research was to investigate differences in diet composition between Achirus mazatlanus and Syacium ovale, two flatfishes inhabiting in a tropical coastal lagoon and to investigate the relationship of their feeding habits to size, body morphometry and mouths characteristics. Fish were collected during sampling trips conducted regularly from 2011 to 2016 using several types of fishing gear. Total number of analyzed stomachs with some food content was 328 for Achirus mazatlanus from 1.4 to 21.3 cm total length (TL) and 203 for Syacium ovale with 1.3 to 24.0 cm TL. Results indicate that both species share a general diet based on benthic invertebrates and fishes but S. ovale has a more piscivorous habit, which can be explained by a more slender body shape and larger teeth, characteristics which increase prey fish catching performance. Important changes in composition of food categories related to size were not found for any species, but larger fish of both species eat larger ranges of prey sizes, and this ontogenetic change is consistent with recent developments on Submitted June 9, 2019 optimal foraging theory. Accepted January 12, 2020 by Francisco Araújo Keywords: Estuarine habitat, Feeding, Ontogenic changes, Pleuronectiformes, Published April 20, 2020 Trophic morphology Online version ISSN 1982-0224 1 Departamento de Estudios para el Desarrollo Sustentable de la Zona Costera, Universidad de Guadalajara, Gómez Farías 82, Print version ISSN 1679-6225 48980 San Patricio-Melaque, Jalisco, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • EDITORIAL Rezados Associados, Todos Já Receberam Informações Sobre O Ppróximo EBI Em Belém, Disponíveis Na Página
    No 125 – ISSN 1808-1436 Londrina, 31 de março de 2018 ICTIOLOGIA EDITORIAL rezados associados, todos já receberam informações sobre o Ppróximo EBI em Belém, disponíveis na página http://www. ebi2019.com.br. Será mais um grande evento de nossa Sociedade, desta vez, presidido pela colega Bianca Bentes da Silva, com a colaboração de toda a sua equipe. No próximo EBI teremos novamente a eleição da diretoria da Sociedade, e conclamamos os associados a iniciarem, desde já, a discussão e proposição de novas chapas, uma vez que a diretoria atual, que já foi reconduzida uma vez, não poderá continuar em uma próxima gestão. Cabe salientar que cada vez mais a SBI e outras associações científicas se constituem em entidades reconhecidas na esfera do Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia e do Ministério do Meio Ambiente, participando de grupos de trabalho, sendo solicitada a emitir pareceres técnicos sobre temas relacionados à Ictiologia ou de fazer indicações para comitês. Esperamos que esta participação seja crescente daqui para a frente. Neste Boletim nossos associados trazem contribuições diversas na área de Ictiologia. Igor Souto Santos e Gabriel Beltrão nos trazem a história da primeira firma de aquarismo no Brasil, sediada no Rio de Janeiro. Juliana Azevedo e Mayara Corazza discutem o emprego da Toxicologia in silico como metodo alternativo aos bioensaios ecotoxicológicos convencionais. Welber Smith e seus colegas trazem uma avaliação sobre a situação atual de avaliação do impacto de rodovias no Brasil sobre a ictiofauna. Na sessão sobre técnicas, Oscar Shibatta nos brinda com o capítulo 9 da série Ilustração de Peixes, explorando a uma técnica japonesa para documentação de peixes, e Fernando Lessa apresenta testes e discute os resultados de fotografias de peixes com tecnologias digitais.
    [Show full text]