Acknowledgements P. Ix Abbreviations P. X Notes on Contributors P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Acknowledgements p. ix Abbreviations p. x Notes on Contributors p. xvi Introduction p. 1 Early Developments in Reception Introduction: The Old Academy to Cicero p. 10 Speusippus and Xenocrates on the Pursuit and Ends of Philosophy p. 29 The Influence of the Platonic Dialogues on Stoic Ethics from Zeno to Panaetius of Rhodesp. 46 Plato and the Freedom of the New Academy p. 58 Return to Plato and Transition to Middle Platonism in Cicero p. 72 Early Imperial Reception of Plato Introduction: Early Imperial Reception of Plato p. 92 From Fringe Reading to Core Curriculum: Commentary, Introduction and Doctrinal p. 101 Summary Philo of Alexandria p. 115 Plutarch of Chaeronea and the Anonymous Commentator on the Theaetetus p. 130 Theon of Smyrna: Re-thinking Platonic Mathematics in Middle Platonism p. 143 Cupid's Swan from the Academy (De Plat. 1.1, 183): Apuleius' Reception of Plato p. 156 Alcinous' Reception of Plato p. 171 Numenius: Portrait of a Platonicus p. 183 Galen and Middle Platonism: The Case of the Demiurge p. 206 Variations of Receptions of Plato during the Second Sophistic p. 223 Early Christianity and Late Antique Platonism Introduction: Early Christianity and Late Antique Platonism p. 252 Origen to Evagrius p. 271 Sethian Gnostic Appropriations of Plato p. 292 Plotinus and Platonism p. 316 Porphyry p. 336 The Anonymous Commentary on the Parmenides p. 351 Iamblichus, the Commentary Tradition, and the Soul p. 366 Amelius and Theodore of Asine p. 381 Plato's Political Dialogues in the Writings of Julian the Emperor p. 400 Plato's Women Readers p. 411 Calcidius p. 433 Augustine's Plato p. 448 Orthodoxy and Allegory: Syrianus' Metaphysical Hermeneutics p. 470 Hermias: On Plato's Phaedrus p. 486 Proclus and the Authority of Plato p. 498 Damascius the Platonic Successor: Socratic Activity and Philosophy in the 6<sup>th</sup>p. Centurty515 CE The Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy p. 533 Olympiodorus of Alexandria p. 555 Simplicius of Cilicia: Plato's Last Interpreter p. 569 Conclusion p. 580 Bibliography p. 583 General Index p. 639 Index Locorum p. 647 Table of Contents provided by Blackwell's Book Services and R.R. Bowker. Used with permission..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Nous: a Globe of Faces1
THE NOUS: A GLOBE OF FACES1 Theodore Sabo, North-West University, South Africa ([email protected]) Abstract: Plotinus inherited the concept of the Nous from the Middle Platonists and ultimately Plato. It was for him both the Demiurge and the abode of the Forms, and his attempts at describing it, often through the use of arresting metaphors, betray substantial eloquence. None of these metaphors is more unusual than that of the globe of faces which is evoked in the sixth Ennead and which is found to possess a notable corollary in the prophet Ezekiel’s vision of the four living creatures. Plotinus’ metaphor reveals that, as in the case of Ezekiel, he was probably granted such a vision, and indeed his encounters with the Nous were not phenomena he considered lightly. Defining the Nous Plotinus’ Nous was a uniquely living entity of which there is a parallel in the Hebrew prophet Ezekiel. The concept of the Nous originated with Anaxagoras. 2 Although Empedocles’ Sphere was similarly a mind,3 Anaxagoras’ idea would win the day, and it would be lavished with much attention by the Middle and Neoplatonists. For Xenocrates the Nous was the supreme God, but for the Middle Platonists it was often the second hypostasis after the One.4 Plotinus, who likewise made the Nous his second hypostasis, equated it with the Demiurge of Plato’s Timaeus.5 He followed Antiochus of Ascalon rather than Plato in regarding it as not only the Demiurge but the Paradigm, the abode of the Forms.6 1 I would like to thank Mark Edwards, Eyjólfur Emilsson, and Svetla Slaveva-Griffin for their help with this article.
[Show full text]
Numenius and the Hellenistic Sources of the Central Christian Doctrine
! Numenius and the Hellenistic Sources ! of the Central Christian Doctrine Marian Hillar Center for Philosophy and Socinian Studies Houston, TX 77004 Paper published in A Journal from the Radical Reformation. A testimony to Biblical Unitarianism. Vol. 14, No.! 1, Spring 2007, pp. 3-31. Quis obsecro, nisi penitus amens logomachias has sine risu toleraret? Nec in Thalmud, nec in Alchoran, sunt tam horrendae blasfemiae. Haec nos hactenus audire ita sumus alsuefacti, ut nihil miremur. Futurae vero generationes stupenda haec iudicabunt. Stupenda sunt vere, plusquam ea daemonum inventa, quae Valentinianis tribuit Irenaeus. I implore you, who in his sane mind could tolerate such logomachias without bursting into laughter? Not in the Talmud, nor in the Qu’ran can one find such horrendous blasphemies. But we are accustomed to hear them to the point that nothing astonishes us. Future generations will judge them obscure. Indeed, they are obscure, much more than the diabolic inventions which Irenaeus attributed to the Valentinians. ! Michael Servetus Christianismi Restitutio, De Trinitate, lib. I. p. 46. Si locum mihi aliquem ostendas, quo verbum illud filius olim vocetur, fatebor me victum. Christianismi Restitutio, If you show me a single passage in which the Son was called the Word, I will give up. Michael Servetus, Christianismi Restitutio, De Trinitate, lib. III p. 108. ! Abstract This paper attempts to explain the sources of the central Christian doctrine about the nature of deity. We can trace a continuous line of thought from the Greek philosophy to the development of the doctrine of the Trinity. The first Christian doctrine was developed by Justin Martyr (114-165 C.E.).
[Show full text]
Simplicius and Avicenna on the Nature of Body
Simplicius and Avicenna on the Nature of Body Abraham D. Stone August 18, 1999 1 Introduction Ibn S¯ına, known to the Latin West as Avicenna, was a medieval Aristotelian— one of the greatest of all medieval Aristotelians. He lived in Persia from 980 to 1037, and wrote mostly in Arabic. Simplicius of Cilicia was a sixth cen- tury Neoplatonist; he is known mostly for his commentaries on Aristotle. Both of these men were, broadly speaking, part of the same philosophical tradition: the tradition of Neoplatonic or Neoplatonizing Aristotelianism. There is probably no direct historical connection between them, however, and anyway I will not try to demonstrate one. In this paper I will examine their closely related, but ultimately quite diﬀerent, accounts of corporeity— of what it is to be a body—and in particular of the essential relationship between corporeity and materiality.1 The problem that both Simplicius and Avicenna face in this respect is as follows. There is a certain genus of substances which forms the subject matter of the science of physics. I will refer to the members of this genus as the physical substances. On the one hand, all and only these physical substances 1A longer and more technical version of this paper will appear, under the title “Simpli- cius and Avicenna on the Essential Corporeity of Material Substance,” in R. Wisnovsky, ed., Aspects of Avicenna (= Princeton Papers: Interdisciplinary Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 9, no. 2) (Princeton: Markus Wiener, 2000). I want to emphasize at the outset that this paper is about Simplicius and Avicenna, not Aristotle.
[Show full text]
The Ideas As Thoughts of God
Études platoniciennes 8 | 2011 Les Formes platoniciennes dans l'Antiquité tardive The Ideas as thoughts of God John Dillon Publisher Société d’Études Platoniciennes Electronic version Printed version URL: http:// Date of publication: 1 November 2011 etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/448 Number of pages: 31-42 DOI: 10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.448 ISSN: 2275-1785 Brought to you by Fondation Maison des sciences de l'homme Electronic reference John Dillon, « The Ideas as thoughts of God », Études platoniciennes [Online], 8 | 2011, Online since 16 December 2014, connection on 24 May 2017. URL : http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/448 ; DOI : 10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.448 © Société d’Études platoniciennes The Ideas as Thoughts of God John Dillon Xenocrates’ Nous-Monad The precise origin of the concept of the Platonic Forms, or Ideas, as thoughts of God is a long-standing puzzle in the history of Platonism, which I am on record as dismissing somewhat brusquely in various works.1 I am glad to have an opportunity to return to it now, in this distinguished company.2 I propose to begin my consideration of it on this occasion by returning to the seminal article of Audrey Rich, published in Mnemosyne back in 1954.3 As you may recall, Rich’s thesis in that article was that the concept arose, whenever it arose – sometime in the early Hellenistic age, was her guess – as a reaction to Aristotle’s concept of the Unmoved Mover of Met. Lambda as an intellect thinking itself, and “a desire to reconcile the Theory of Ideas with the Aristotelian doctrine of immanent form” (p.
[Show full text]
Alcinous' Reception of Plato
chapter 10 Alcinous’ Reception of Plato Carl S. O’Brien* I Introduction It is clear now that the author of the Didaskalikos was indeed Alcinous, and the attribution to Albinus should be regarded as an error, resulting from a mis- guided conjecture by Freudenthal.1 Alcinous’ use of Plato can be characterized in terms of three central features. Firstly, his work is a handbook or instruction manual, although the level of instruction at certain points can seem relatively advanced. This suggests that it is not a handbook intended for beginners, but rather those who have already received some instruction in Platonism (pos- sibly as a refresher manual for teachers of Platonism).2 Secondly, Alcinous composed the Didaskalikos during the phase of Platonism identified as Mid- dle Platonic and, as is typical of the period, Aristotelian and Stoic strands and terminology are combined with his Platonic heritage (although one must also note that many of the Aristotelian and Stoic elements which find their way into Middle Platonism often had a Platonic inspiration to begin with). In light of the lack of a distinctive “orthodox” Platonism, a range of opinions was toler- ated and regarded as philosophically acceptable. This is undertaken from the dual perspective of modernizing or updating Plato, as well as claiming sub- sequent Aristotelian and Stoic advances for Plato himself; a good example is logic at Did. 5, which can be claimed to owe its origin to Platonic dialectic, although Plato himself never identified logic as a subdivision of philosophy. Thirdly, Plato is reduced by Alcinous to a series of dogmata or doctrines; he is stripped of his literary character and, although it is clear that Plato’s philoso- phy permeates the Didaskalikos, we do not get the sense of Alcinous drawing upon any dialogue in its entirety.
[Show full text]
The Fragments of the Poem of Parmenides
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by D-Scholarship@Pitt RESTORING PARMENIDES’ POEM: ESSAYS TOWARD A NEW ARRANGEMENT OF THE FRAGMENTS BASED ON A REASSESSMENT OF THE ORIGINAL SOURCES by Christopher John Kurfess B.A., St. John’s College, 1995 M.A., St. John’s College, 1996 M.A., University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, 2000 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Christopher J. Kurfess It was defended on November 8, 2012 and approved by Dr. Andrew M. Miller, Professor, Department of Classics Dr. John Poulakos, Associate Professor, Department of Communication Dr. Mae J. Smethurst, Professor, Department of Classics Dissertation Supervisor: Dr. Edwin D. Floyd, Professor, Department of Classics ii Copyright © by Christopher J. Kurfess 2012 iii RESTORING PARMENIDES’ POEM Christopher J. Kurfess, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 2012 The history of philosophy proper, claimed Hegel, began with the poem of the Presocratic Greek philosopher Parmenides. Today, that poem is extant only in fragmentary form, the various fragments surviving as quotations, translations or paraphrases in the works of better-preserved authors of antiquity. These range from Plato, writing within a century after Parmenides’ death, to the sixth-century C.E. commentator Simplicius of Cilicia, the latest figure known to have had access to the complete poem. Since the Renaissance, students of Parmenides have relied on collections of fragments compiled by classical scholars, and since the turn of the twentieth century, Hermann Diels’ Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, through a number of editions, has remained the standard collection for Presocratic material generally and for the arrangement of Parmenides’ fragments in particular.
[Show full text]
Download PDF (598.6
Index A Protrepticus 121, 122, 163, 233 Topica 233 Abraham 23, 211 ἐνέργεια Aetius 6, 7, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, Arius 5, 6, 9, 10, 46, 48, 49, 50, 95, 96, 97, 98, 114, 115, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 119, 150, 151, 159, 166, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 167, 204, 228, 233 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 73, 76, knowledge of God 78, 79, 86, 89, 116, 119, knowledge of substance (ὀυσία) 137, 161, 227, 228, 238, Syntagmation 7, 89, 115, 159, 241, 242, 243 166, 233 arian controversy 25, 34, 49, Aghiorgoussis M. 200, 238 70, 77, 137, 139, 140, 146, Alcinous 39, 40, 41, 45, 131, 233 148, 149 Anatolios, K. 76, 238 attributes of God 36, 101, 114, Andia Y. de 238 141 Anomeans 6, 7, 8, 9, 34, 45, 89, Creation ex nihilo 57 119, 140, 219, 221, 225, (Father and Son) will and wish 228 (βούλημα καί θέλημα) 56 Aristotle 10, 11, 13, 31, 40, 42, Monad and Diad 51 81, 92, 93, 94, 95, 103, negative theology 5, 9, 10, 55, 104, 119, 120, 121, 122, 60, 62, 64, 68, 69, 161, 227 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, status of the Son of God 2 131, 132, 134, 138, 144, Thalia 54, 62, 67 148, 152, 159, 160, 161, Armstrong A.H. 40, 238 163, 164, 169, 177, 197, Athanasius 34, 48, 57, 62, 64, 66, 204, 233, 237, 238, 239, 69, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 240 77, 79, 90, 146, 147, 227, Analytica Posteriora 233, 237 233, 234, 238, 239, 240, Analytica Priora 233 241 Categoriae 233 Contra Gentes 74, 233 De anima 122, 233 De decretis Niceane synodi 65, De generatione animalium 233 233 De interpretatione 169, 233 De Incarnatione 71, 74, 233 Ethica Nicomachea 233 De Synodis Arimini in Italia et knowledge of substance (ὀυσία) Seleuciae in Isauria 234 Metaphysica 233 245 Tomasz Stpie and Karolina Kochaczyk-Boniska - 9783631757369 Downloaded from PubFactory at 09/26/2021 05:34:38AM via free access Epistula ad episcopos Aegypti at theory of names 6, 166, 229, Libyae 234 239 Epistula ad Serapionem 234 worship and knowledge 99 knowledge of God 69, 71, 72, negativetheology 73, 77 Beeley Ch.
[Show full text]
The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
THE CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY IN LATE ANTIQUITY The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity comprises over forty specially commissioned essays by experts on the philosophy of the period 200–800 ce. Designed as a successor to The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (ed. A. H. Armstrong), it takes into account some forty years of schol- arship since the publication of that volume. The contributors examine philosophy as it entered literature, science and religion, and offer new and extensive assess- ments of philosophers who until recently have been mostly ignored. The volume also includes a complete digest of all philosophical works known to have been written during this period. It will be an invaluable resource for all those interested in this rich and still emerging ﬁeld. lloyd p. gerson is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Toronto. He is the author of numerous books including Ancient Epistemology (Cambridge, 2009), Aristotle and Other Platonists (2005)andKnowing Persons: A Study in Plato (2004), as well as the editor of The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (1996). The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity Volume I edited by LLOYD P. GERSON cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 8ru,UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521876421 C Cambridge University Press 2010 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
[Show full text]
Table of Contents
Table of Contents Preface................................................................................................................................ VII Table of Contents............................................................................................................... XI Abbreviations and Primary Sources Table...................................................................... XVII Part I: Mapping the Apostle Paul’s Moral Milieu 1 Chapter 1: An Introduction to Greco-Roman Philosophy of Mind............ 3 1. What Is Ancient Philosophy of Mind?.............................................................................. 3 2. Which Moral Transformation Systems and Why............................................................. 5 3. Power, Human Agency, and Divine Correspondence....................................................... 12 Chapter 2: Contingency, Coherence, and Philosophical Systems.............. 17 1. Methods and Models......................................................................................................... 17 1.1. A Proviso on the Use of the Term System.............................................................. 17 1.2. Toward an Abstracted Model of Moral Transformation........................................ 23 2. Components to Moral Transformation............................................................................ 31 2.1. Why Begin with the Passions: Defining Their Structure and Power.................... 31 2.2. Philosophical Reactions to Popular Views on the Passions .................................
[Show full text]
Unknown God, Known in His Activities EUROPEAN STUDIES in THEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY and HISTORY of RELIGIONS Edited by Bartosz Adamczewski
18 What can man know about God? This question became one of the main Tomasz Stępień / problems during the 4th-century Trinitarian controversy, which is the focus Karolina Kochańczyk-Bonińska of this book. Especially during the second phase of the conflict, the claims of Anomean Eunomius caused an emphatic response of Orthodox writers, mainly Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyssa. Eunomius formulated two ways of theology to show that we can know both the substance (ousia) and activities (energeiai) of God. The Orthodox Fathers demonstrated that we can know only the external activities of God, while the essence is entirely incom- prehensible. Therefore the 4th-century discussion on whether the Father and the Son are of the same substance was the turning point in the development Unknown God, of negative theology and shaping the Christian conception of God. Known Unknown God, Known God, Unknown in His Activities in His Activities Incomprehensibility of God during the Trinitarian Controversy of the 4th Century stopibhuarly Jewish Sources Tomasz Stępień is Associate Professor at the Faculty of Theology, Cardi- Karolina Kochańczyk-Bonińska · nal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw. He researches and publishes / on Ancient Philosophy, Early Christian Philosophy, Natural Theology and Philosophy of Religion. European Studies in Theology, Karolina Kochańczyk-Bonińska is Assistant Professor at the Institute of Philosophy and History of Religions the Humanities and Social Sciences, War Studies University in Warsaw. She researches and publishes on Early Christian Philosophy and translates Edited by Bartosz Adamczewski patristic texts. Stępień Tomasz ISBN 978-3-631-75736-9 EST_018 275736-Stepien_TL_A5HC 151x214 globalL.indd 1 04.07.18 17:07 18 What can man know about God? This question became one of the main Tomasz Stępień / problems during the 4th-century Trinitarian controversy, which is the focus Karolina Kochańczyk-Bonińska of this book.
[Show full text]
The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
THE CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY IN LATE ANTIQUITY The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity comprises over forty specially commissioned essays by experts on the philosophy of the period 200–800 ce. Designed as a successor to The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (ed. A. H. Armstrong), it takes into account some forty years of schol- arship since the publication of that volume. The contributors examine philosophy as it entered literature, science and religion, and offer new and extensive assess- ments of philosophers who until recently have been mostly ignored. The volume also includes a complete digest of all philosophical works known to have been written during this period. It will be an invaluable resource for all those interested in this rich and still emerging ﬁeld. lloyd p. gerson is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Toronto. He is the author of numerous books including Ancient Epistemology (Cambridge, 2009), Aristotle and Other Platonists (2005)andKnowing Persons: A Study in Plato (2004), as well as the editor of The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus (1996). The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity Volume II edited by LLOYD P. GERSON cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 8ru,UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521876421 C Cambridge University Press 2010 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
[Show full text]
A Concise History of the Philosophy of Mathematics
A Thumbnail History of the Philosophy of Mathematics "It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Imannuel Kant ( 1724 – 1804 ) ( However naïve realism is no substitute for truth [1] ) [1] " ... concepts have reference to sensible experience, but they are never, in a logical sense, deducible from them. For this reason I have never been able to comprehend the problem of the á priori as posed by Kant", from "The Problem of Space, Ether, and the Field in Physics" ( "Das Raum-, Äether- und Feld-Problem der Physik." ), by Albert Einstein, 1934 - source: "Beyond Geometry: Classic Papers from Riemann to Einstein", Dover Publications, by Peter Pesic, St. John's College, Sante Fe, New Mexico Mathematics does not have a universally accepted definition during any period of its development throughout the history of human thought. However for the last 2,500 years, beginning first with the pre - Hellenic Egyptians and Babylonians, mathematics encompasses possible deductive relationships concerned solely with logical truths derived by accepted philosophic methods of logic which the classical Greek thinkers of antiquity pioneered. Although it is normally associated with formulaic algorithms ( i.e., mechanical methods ), mathematics somehow arises in the human mind by the correspondence of observation and inductive experiential thinking together with its practical predictive powers in interpreting future as well as "seemingly" ephemeral phenomena. Why all of this is true in human progress, no one can answer faithfully. In other words, human experiences and intuitive thinking first suggest to the human mind the abstract symbols for which the economy of human thinking mathematics is well known; but it is those parts of mathematics most disconnected from observation and experience and therefore relying almost wholly upon its internal, self - consistent, deductive logics giving mathematics an independent reified, almost ontological, reality, that mathematics most powerfully interprets the ultimate hidden mysteries of nature.
[Show full text]