Development, Evolution, and Adaptation Author(S): Kim Sterelny Source: Philosophy of Science, Vol

Copy Link

Philosophy of Science Association

Development, Evolution, and Adaptation Author(s): Kim Sterelny Source: Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67, Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers (Sep., 2000), pp. S369-S387 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/188681

Accessed: 03/03/2010 17:09

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at

http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Philosophy of Science Association and The University of Chicago Press are collaborating with JSTOR to

digitize, preserve and extend access to Philosophy of Science. http://www.jstor.org

Recommended publications

Philosophical Perspectives on Evolutionary Theory

Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 92: 461–464, 2009 Philosophical perspectives on Evolutionary Theory A Tapper Centre for Applied Ethics & Philosophy, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA [email protected] Manuscript received December 2009; accepted February 2010 Abstract Discussion of Darwinian evolutionary theory by philosophers has gone through a number of historical phases, from indifference (in the first hundred years), to criticism (in the 1960s and 70s), to enthusiasm and expansionism (since about 1980). This paper documents these phases and speculates about what, philosophically speaking, underlies them. It concludes with some comments on the present state of the evolutionary debate, where rapid and important changes within evolutionary theory may be passing by unnoticed by philosophers. Keywords: Darwinism, evolutionary theory, philosophy of biology; evolution. Introduction author. Biologists such as Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould, Steve Jones and Simon Conway Morris are Darwin once said that he had no aptitude for prominent. So also are historians of science, such as Peter philosophy: “My power to follow a long and purely Bowler, Janet Browne, Adrian Desmond and James R. abstract train of thought is very limited; I should, Moore. Equally likely, however, one might be introduced moreover, never have succeeded with metaphysics or to evolutionary theory by a philosopher of biology, for mathematics” (Darwin 1958). This was not false modesty; example Michael Ruse, David Hull or Kim Sterelny. (For
Sex and Death: an Introduction to Philosophy of Biology Pdf Free

SEX AND DEATH: AN INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kim Sterelny,Paul Griffiths | 416 pages | 15 Jun 1999 | The University of Chicago Press | 9780226773049 | English | Chicago, IL, United States Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology PDF Book Beyond the Modular Emotions Harriet S. The Nature of Species 9. Reduction by Degrees? Griffiths present both the science and the philosophical context necessary for a critical understanding of the most exciting debates shaping biology today. Overall I wouldn't say it is a bad book, and certainly gives tons of information about philosophy of biology, but I think I tried to bite off more than I can chew. Enlightenment, Compassion and Bioscientific Phenomena 4. Replicators and Interactors 3. How can I wanted to dig deeper into evolutionary biology, but I had two problems. There are few things I got from it. Privacy Policy Terms of Use. Other editions. Is the history of life a series of accidents or a drama scripted by selfish genes? However, for technical advancements to make real impacts both on patient health and genuine scientific understanding, quite a number of lingering challenges facing the entire spectrum from protein biology all the way to randomized controlled trials should start to be overcome. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Crandall , Norman C. Reduction in General Philosophy of Science. Images Additional images. Informed answers to questions like these, critical to our understanding of ourselves and the world around us, require both a knowledge o Is the history of life a series of accidents or a drama scripted by selfish genes? The Balance of Nature In this accessible introduction to philosophy of biology, Kim Sterelny and Paul E.
Curriculum Vitae

CURRICULUM VITAE Philip Stuart Kitcher February 2018 Date of Birth: February 20 1947 Place of Birth: London, England Citizenship: British by origin, naturalized American citizen (May 1995). Home address: 454 Riverside Drive, Apt. 6B, New York, NY 10027 Home phone: (212)-662-5812 Office phone: (212)-854-4884, (212)-854-3196 (department) E-mail: [email protected] Higher Education Christ's College, Cambridge; 1966-1969, B.A. 1969, (M.A. 1996). (First class honours in Mathematics/History and Philosophy of Science) Princeton University; 1969-1973; Ph.D. 1974 (Department of Philosophy/Program in History and Philosophy of Science) Honorary Degree Doctor, honoris causa Erasmus University Rotterdam November 2013 (on the occasion of the University centennial; awarded for “outstanding contributions to philosophy of science”) Honors and Awards Henry Schuman Prize (awarded by the History of Science Society, for the best essay by a graduate student), 1971 University of Vermont Summer Research Grant, 1975 University of Vermont Summer Research Grant, 1979 NEH Summer Research Grant, 1979 ACLS Study Fellowship, 1981-82 University of Vermont Distinguished Scholar in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1983 NEH Fellowship for College Teachers, 1983-84 NEH Grant for Institute to Investigate a Possible New Consensus in Philosophy of Science (Joint Principal Investigator with C. Wade Savage) 1 Imre Lakatos Award (co-winner with Michael Friedman) 1986. Awarded for Vaulting Ambition. NEH Fellowship for University Teachers 1988-89 (declined) John Simon Guggenheim Fellowship 1988-89 Principal Investigator, five-year NSF Research and Training Grant for the development of a Science Studies Center at UCSD. (Awarded Fall 1990). Revelle College (UCSD) Distinguished Teaching Award, 1990.
Universal Biology

Universal Biology by Carlos Mariscal Department of Philosophy Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Robert N. Brandon, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Alexander Rosenberg, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Tyler Curtain ___________________________ Daniel W. McShea ___________________________ Karen Neander ___________________________ V. Louise Roth Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Duke University 2014 ABSTRACT Universal Biology by Carlos Mariscal Department of Philosophy Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Robert N. Brandon, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Alexander Rosenberg, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Tyler Curtain ___________________________ Daniel W. McShea ___________________________ Karen Neander ___________________________ V. Louise Roth An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Duke University 2014 Universal Biology by Carlos Mariscal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en_US. 2014 Abstract Our only example of life is our own– which forms a single lineage. We know little about
The Philosophy of Molecular and Developmental Biology

The Philosophy of Molecular and Developmental Biology Paul E. Griffiths, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA [email protected] http://www.pitt.edu/~pauleg To appear in Blackwell’s Guide to Philosophy of Science, P.K. Machamer and M. Silberstein (Eds) Introduction Philosophical discussion of molecular and developmental biology began in the late 1960s with the use of genetics as a test case for models of theory reduction. With this exception, the theory of natural selection remained the main focus of philosophy of biology until the late 1970s. It was controversies in evolutionary theory over punctuated equilibrium and adaptationism that first led philosophers to examine the concept of developmental constraint. Developmental biology also gained in prominence in the 1980s as part of a broader interest in the new sciences of self-organization and complexity. The current literature in the philosophy of molecular and developmental biology has grown out of these earlier discussions under the influence of twenty years of rapid and exciting growth of empirical knowledge. Philosophers have examined the concepts of genetic information and genetic program, competing definitions of the gene itself and competing accounts of the role of the gene as a developmental cause. The debate over the relationship between development and evolution has been enriched by theories and results from the new field of ‘evolutionary developmental biology’. Future developments seem likely to include an The Philosophy of Molecular and Developmental Biology 2 exchange of ideas with the philosophy of psychology, where debates over the concept of innateness have created an interest in genetics and development.
Philosophy of Biology”

“Philosophy of Biology” Thomas Pradeu (ImmunoConcept, UMR5164, CNRS & Univ. Bordeaux; IHPST, UMR8590, CNRS & Panthéon-Sorbonne Univ., France) in A. Barberousse, D. Bonnay and M. Cozic (eds.), Handbook in Philosophy of Science, Oxford University Press. Translated from French by Christopher Robertson Introduction “Philosophy of biology” refers to the critical examination of the conceptual, theoretical and methodological foundations of today’s life sciences. Although biology, contrary to a mis-held notion, was not entirely absent from the logical positivists' preoccupations (Byron, 2007), philosophy of biology, as such, remains a recent field of study; for the most part its founders, practically all of them Anglo-Saxons, are still alive today. Important founders include David Hull (1935-2010), Michael Ruse (born in 1940), and Elliott Sober (born in 1948). A testimony to the influence of these founders, philosophy of biology has been dominated by questions about evolution, something which is still true today, as testified, in particular, by the contents of the main textbooks in the field (Sterelny and Griffiths, 1999; Sober, 2006; Rosenberg and McShea, 2008; Godfrey-Smith 2014). This situation is probably undergoing a slow change as interest in questions of molecular biology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology become more and more established, but the domination of evolutionary issues in philosophy of biology remains extremely strong. Philosophy of biology has been particularly structured and institutionalized around one journal,
Curriculum Vitae DANIEL C. DENNETT

Page 1 August 12, 2021 Curriculum Vitae DANIEL C. DENNETT PERSONAL: Married to Susan Bell Dennett; two children. EDUCATION: B.A., Harvard University, 1963 D. Phil. (philosophy), Oxford, 1965 HONORARY DEGREES: Doctor of Humane Letters, University of Connecticut, 2003 Doctor of Letters, Edinburgh, 2006/7 Doctor of Science, McGill, 2007 Doctor of Science, Bucharest, 2011 Doctor of Science, Amsterdam, 2012 Honorary Doctorate, Radboud, Nijmegen, 2018 AWARDS: A.P.A. Barwise Prize, December 2004 Humanist of the Year, American Humanist Association, 2004 Bertrand Russell Society Award, Plymouth State University, NH, June 18-20, 2004 Academy of Achievement Golden Plate Award, 2006 Richard Dawkins Prize, Atheist Alliance International, 2007 Distinguished Fellow Award, Cognitive Science Society, 2009 Books (Darwin’s Dangerous Idea and Breaking the Spell) chosen for ISSR Library, 2009 AAAS Fellow --selected as 2009 Fellow by the American Association for the Advancement of Science Erasmus Prize, Amsterdam, November, 2012 Mind and Brain Prize, Center for Cognitive Science of Turin, Torino, Italy, October 12th, 2011 SINe medal, University of Padova, May 19th, 2016 Daniel C. Dennett, Curriculum vitae Page 2 Award for contribution to Neuroscience and Psychology, INECO Committee, Buenos Aires, June 21st, 2016 Carl Sagan Award, Carnegie Mellon University, November 8th, 2018 FELLOWSHIPS: Woodrow Wilson Fellowship, 1963 (declined, to study at Oxford) Guggenheim Fellowship, 1973-74 (declined in favor of next two items) Santayana Fellowship, Harvard University, 1974 (honorary). N. E. H. Younger Humanist Fellowship, 1974. Fulbright Research Fellowship to the University, Bristol, England, 1978. Visiting Fellowship, All Souls College, Oxford, 1979. N. E. H. Senior Fellowship, 1979. Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, 1979- 80.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection Homunculi Rule

Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection Reviews by Daniel Dennett, Kim Sterelny, and David Queller, with replies by Peter Godfrey-Smith For Biology and Philosophy, 2011 Homunculi Rule Daniel Dennett 1. Down with Essentialism This is the best, most thought-provoking book in the philosophy of biology that I have read in a long time. It is rigorously argued, deeply informed, full of wonderful examples, and it has more novel ideas within its pages than any two other recent books in the field that I can think of. It has opened my mind on several key issues and changed my mind as well; it is also provoked me to come up with what I hope are better defenses of some of the points of my position criticized in the book. One of the most important things we have learned from Darwin (but some philosophers, alas, still don’t get it), is that essentialism is simply a mistake. There is no mystery about why many philosophers resist this verdict: their method, going back to Socrates, demands exceptionless definitions and self-evident axioms, from which deductive consequences can be made to flow. Philosophers are not alone in their weakness for essentialism. Even evolutionary theorists have often succumbed to the temptation to define the essence of Darwinism, the necessary and sufficient conditions for natural selection to occur. For one thing, this makes for effective pedagogy. But a good Darwinian should attempt to honor Darwinism about Darwinism itself—in Glenn Adelson’s apt phrase—and Peter Godfrey Smith (henceforth PGS) shows us how to think about all the many marginal cases—the semi-Darwinian processes, proto- Darwinian phenomena, quasi-Darwinian relationships—without marginalizing them.
The Power and Promise of Developmental Systems Theory Letitia Meynell

Document generated on 09/24/2021 4:50 p.m. Les ateliers de l'éthique The Ethics Forum The Power and Promise of Developmental Systems Theory Letitia Meynell Volume 3, Number 2, Fall 2008 Article abstract I argue that it is time for many feminists to rethink their attitudes towards URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1044598ar evolutionary biology, not because feminists have been wrong to be deeply DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1044598ar sceptical about many of its claims, both explicit and implicit, but because biology itself has changed. A new appreciation for the importance of See table of contents development in biology has become mainstream and a new ontology, associated with developmental systems theory (DST), has been introduced over the last two decades. This turn challenges some of the features of evolutionary Publisher(s) biology that have most troubled feminists. DST undermines the idea of biological essences and challenges both nature/nurture and nature/culture Centre de recherche en éthique de l’Université de Montréal distinctions. Freed from these conceptual constraints, evolutionary biology no longer poses the problems that have justified feminist scepticism. Indeed, ISSN feminists have already found useful applications for DST and I argue that they should expand their use of DST to support more radical and wide-ranging 1718-9977 (digital) political theories. Explore this journal Cite this article Meynell, L. (2008). The Power and Promise of Developmental Systems Theory. Les ateliers de l'éthique / The Ethics Forum, 3(2), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.7202/1044598ar Tous droits réservés © Centre de recherche en éthique de l’Université de This document is protected by copyright law.
Philosophy of Biology

PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY SECOND EDITION -i- [This page intentionally left blank.] -ii- Also by Elliott Sober Simplicity The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference Core Questions in Philosophy Reconstructing Marxism: Explanation and the Theory of History (with Erik Wright and Andrew Levine) From a Biological Point of View: Essays in Evolutionary Philosophy Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior (with David Sloan Wilson) -iii- Dimensions of Philosophy Series Norman Danielsand Keith Lehrer, Editors Philosophy of Biology, Second Edition, Elliott Sober Contemporary Continental Philosophy, Robert D'Amico Philosophical Ethics, Stephen Darwall Normative Ethics, Shelly Kagan Introduction to Marx and Engels: A Critical Reconstruction, Second Edition, Richard Schmitt Political Philosophy, Jean Hampton Philosophy of Mind, Jaegwon Kim Philosophy of Social Science, Second Edition, Alexander Rosenberg Philosophy of Education, Nel Noddings Philosophy of Law: An Introduction to Jurisprudence, Revised Edition, Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jules L. Coleman FORTHCOMING Metaphysics, Second Edition, Peter van Inwagen Theory of Knowledge, Second Edition, Keith Lehrer Philosophy of Physics, Revised Edition, Lawrence Sklar Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Barbara Von Eckardt -iv- PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY SECOND EDITION Elliott Sober UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON Westview PRESS A Member of the Perseus Books Group -v- Dimensions of Philosophy Series All
Memetics Vs. Human Extension: Round One – a Meme by Any Other Name … Gregory Sandstrom, European Humanities University, Lithuanian Science Council1

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2013 Vol. 3, No. 1, 28-37. http://wp.me/P1Bfg0-Y9 Memetics vs. Human Extension: Round One – A Meme by Any Other Name … Gregory Sandstrom, European Humanities University, Lithuanian Science Council1 More than Memetics This Collective Vision article will make a brief comparison of the ‘extended phenotype’ theory and the ‘extended mind’ hypothesis, while also drawing on the ‘human extension’ work of Marshall McLuhan. The aim is to probe the notion that human beings can and do ‘extend’ and that ‘human extension’ and the ‘extended mind’ are appropriate language for application in social sciences and humanities (SSH). This marks an alternative to the biologically-biased term ‘memes’ and the ideology of memetics, as well as the outdated ‘universal Darwinism,’ which the originator of memetics, Richard Dawkins, generally advocates. As Andy Clark and David Chalmers write, “the mind extends into the world” (1998). Similarly, as Richard Menary notes, “The extended mind begins with the question ‘where does the mind stop and the rest of the world begin?’” (2010,1). Indeed, this is similar to the problem that Dawkins attempted to face with ‘memes’ and their ‘phenotypic effects,’ the latter which he says “are its consequences in the outside world” (1982, 109), a claim that is actually made more forcefully by Daniel Dennett, than by Dawkins.2 McLuhan is well-known for his ‘extensions of man’ (here called ‘human extension’) approach, which in short says that “all human artefacts are extensions of man[kind]” (1988, 116), thus reifying the extended mind hypothesis for SSH.3 And most recently, an international network of more than 50 scholars, including Clark, is applying the work on extended mind and extended cognition in a project called ‘extended knowledge’ (Pritchard et al.
The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science

The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science Bringing together the latest scientific advances and some of the most enduring subtle philosophical puzzles and problems, this book collects original historical and contemporary sources to explore the wide range of issues surrounding the nature of life. Selections ranging from Aristotle and Descartes to Sagan and Dawkins are organized around four broad themes covering classical discussions of life, the origins and extent of natural life, contemporary artificial life creations, and the definition and meaning of “life” in its most general form. Each section is preceded by an extensive introduction connecting the various ideas discussed in individual chapters and providing helpful background material for understanding them. With its interdisciplinary perspective, this fascinating collection is essential reading for scientists and philosophers interested in astrobiology, the origin of life, synthetic biology, and the philosophy of life. Mark A. Bedau is Professor of Philosophy and Humanities at Reed College, Oregon, Director of the Initiative for Science, Society, and Policy in Denmark, and a regular Visiting Professor at the European School of Molecular Medicine in Milan, Italy. He is an internationally recognized leader in the philosophical and scientific study of living systems and has published and lectured extensively on issues concerning emergence, evolution, life, mind, and the social and ethical implications of creating life from nonliving materials. Carol E. Cleland is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Colorado (Boulder). She is a central figure in the emerging science of astrobiology and has published in major science as well as philosophy journals. Her research focuses on issues in scientific methodology, historical science (especially earth and planetary science), biology (especially microbiology, origins of life, the nature of life, and astrobiology), and the theory of computation.