DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form JUL I U

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form JUL I U i-orm 10-SOU (Oct. 1SSO) 'V '.••. !?r RECEIVED 2280 ' United States Department of the Interior National Park Service JUL i u P*d National Register of Historic Places f CES Registration Form NAT REGISTER Of HiSlUKIl Pl> NATIONAL PARKSERVICE.•^i i 1 1"^ This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box cr by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property___________________________________________________________ historic name Berkeley Historic Civic Center District other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number not for publication citv or town __ Berkeley N/A Q state California code CA county A lame da code _201 Zip code 3, State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this 23 nomination Q request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property CS3 meets G does not meettlie National-Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationaHy-G statewide Of locally. (Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of codifying Date State Historic' reservation Officer State of Federal agency and bureau L_ ..__i !n my opinion, the property D meets G does not meet the National Register criteria. (Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) I Signature of commenting official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification 1 hereby certify that the property is: Date of Action Y^6»-«Qtered in the National Register. V Q See continuation sheet. Q determined eligible for the ' National Register D See continuation sheet. D determined not eligible for the National Register. Q removed from the National Register L; other, (explain:) H J. am eua. Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) 5 private D building(s) Contributing Noncontributing 6 public-local & district 7 3 buildings D public-State D site & public-Federal D structure 1 0 sites D object 1 0 structures 0 0 objects 9 3 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Register N/A_______________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) (See attached continuation sheet) 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials , (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) foundation __________ (See attached) walls _____________ roof other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) (See attached) .berKeiey u.iviu Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) Politics/Government H A Property is associated with events that have made Social History a significant contribution to the broad patterns of Architecture our history. Community D B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. E C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1909 - 1950 D D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: D A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person D B removed from Us original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) N/A________________ D C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D D a cemetery. N/A_______ D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property. n G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. Bakewell, John R.; Brown, Arthur, Jr.; Corlett, William, Sr.; Gutterson, Henry Higby; Maybeck, Bernard Ralph; Morgan, Narrative Statement of Significance Julia; Meyers, Henry H.; Plachek, James W.; Schnier, (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Jacques; Howard, Robert Boardman 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (See attached) (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NFS): Primary location of additional data: D preliminary determination of individual listing (36 S State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested D Other State agency D previously listed in the National Register D Federal agency D previously determined eligible by the National S Local government Register S University D designated a National Historic Landmark D Other D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: D recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # _____________ Civic Gpnt.pr District Alameda County, uamornia Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property (Under 10 acres) UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 2 I I I I I I I I I I I l I I l 4 ___I I____ 1,1,1, D See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title Susan Cerny/Arch'l Historian; Jerri Holan/Arch'l Historian; Linda Perry/ Historian organizatiorBerkeley Architectural Heritage Assoc. date March 2, 1998 street & number23l8 Durant Avenue______________ telephone (510)841-22^2 city or town Berkeley__________________ state CA zip code Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner______________________________ (Complete this item at the request of SHPO or FPO.) name (Varies - please see attached)_______________________ street & number telephone city or town __ state zip code Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act. as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et see/.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division. National Park Service. P.O. Box 37127. Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget. Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018). Washington. DC 20503. US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1993 O - 350-416 QL 3 NPS Form IO-900-a OM8 Appnov* Mo. 10S4-OOia BERKELEY CIVIC CENTER DISTRICT United States Department of the Interior ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number Page # 6 Function or Use Historic Functions____ Current Functions 1. 2134 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way GOVERNMENT/city hall EDUCAHON/administrative 2. AIIston-MLK Jr. Ways-Center Street LANDSCAPE'park 3. 1931 Center Street .SOCIAL/civic SOCIAL/civic 4. 2180 Milvia Street GOVERNMENT/banking GOVERNMENT/city hall 5. 193X) Allston Way EDUCATION/CULTURE/theater EDUCATION/CULTURE/theater 6. 2001 Allston Way SOQAL/civic-recreational SOdAL/civic-recieadonal 7. 2000 Allston Way GO VERNMENT/post office GO VERNMENT/post office 8. 1947 Center Street COMMERCE/business COMMERCE/business 9. 1835 Allston Way GOVERNMENT/city hall annex EDUCAHON/administrative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bronx Civic Center
    Prepared for New York State BRONX CIVIC CENTER Downtown Revitalization Initiative Downtown Revitalization Initiative New York City Strategic Investment Plan March 2018 BRONX CIVIC CENTER LOCAL PLANNING COMMITTEE Co-Chairs Hon. Ruben Diaz Jr., Bronx Borough President Marlene Cintron, Bronx Overall Economic Development Corporation Daniel Barber, NYCHA Citywide Council of Presidents Michael Brady, Third Avenue BID Steven Brown, SoBRO Jessica Clemente, Nos Quedamos Michelle Daniels, The Bronx Rox Dr. David Goméz, Hostos Community College Shantel Jackson, Concourse Village Resident Leader Cedric Loftin, Bronx Community Board 1 Nick Lugo, NYC Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Milton Nuñez, NYC Health + Hospitals/Lincoln Paul Philps, Bronx Community Board 4 Klaudio Rodriguez, Bronx Museum of the Arts Rosalba Rolón, Pregones Theater/Puerto Rican Traveling Theater Pierina Ana Sanchez, Regional Plan Association Dr. Vinton Thompson, Metropolitan College of New York Eileen Torres, BronxWorks Bronx Borough President’s Office Team James Rausse, AICP, Director of Planning and Development Jessica Cruz, Lead Planner Raymond Sanchez, Counsel & Senior Policy Manager (former) Dirk McCall, Director of External Affairs This document was developed by the Bronx Civic Center Local Planning Committee as part of the Downtown Revitalization Initiative and was supported by the NYS Department of State, NYS Homes and Community Renewal, and Empire State Development. The document was prepared by a Consulting Team led by HR&A Advisors and supported by Beyer Blinder Belle,
    [Show full text]
  • The San Francisco Civic Center
    - THE SAN FRANCISCO CIVIC CENTER: A STUDY IN URBAN FORM OCTOBER 1987 URBAN DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SAN FRANCISCO'S CIVIC CENTER UNDERTAKEN BY THE URBAN DESIGN COMMITTEE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS SAN FRANCISCO CHAPTER DEVELOPED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING & THE CIVIC DESIGN COMMITTEE SAN FRANCISCO ARTS COMMISSION SPONSORED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA PREFACE/ACKNOWLEGEMENTS. The report presented herein is the culmination of a design charrette undertaken to reawaken public interest/civic spirit in the Civic Center Area. The goal of this study is to facilitate the completion of a world-class civic center begun in the early 20th century. The vision of this special urban place and the current physical form is the combined efforts and talents of many individuals. With sensitive reinforcement we believe the vision of civic leaders, nearly 80 years ago, can be fully realized. It is our hope that this study can act as a catalyst in evolving this vision and that the continued completion of this great civic composition is accomplished. The charrette study took place on the 13, 14 , 22 and 23 of July 1987. We wish to accnowledge the valued participation of the following individuals: Clark Manus, Chairperson Alex Bonutti, Steering Committee F. Lee Moulton, Steering Commitee Bruce Race, Group Leader Philip Enquist, Group Leader Michael Stanton, Group Leader Erin Bell, Camilo Carrillo, Marien Coss, Norman Davis, Mary Dooley, Lester Gerstman, Rob Gibson, Maria Gray, Ricka Hale,
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Civic Center Complex
    ATTACHMENT E lWagellall DMJM H&N AECOM CO~'Ul"~C Facilities Condition Assessment San Diego Civic Center Complex Facilities Condition Assessment Staubach, Inc. San Diego, California April 2008 Facilities Condition Assessment San Diego Civic Center Complex 21 • DMJM H&N • MAGELLAN CONSULTING • Facilities Condition Assessment San Diego Civic Center Complex San Diego Qvic Center Complex Fad/ities Condition Assessment ITable of Contents The San Diego Civic Center Complex Condition Assessment JJ'as conductedfrom l.Vfarch 24, 2008 through iVfarch 28, 2008. The assessment IJJas conducted JJ}ith architectural, mechanical. electrical and stmct1lral engineering disciplines represented. This dOCllment contains the restllts ifthe assessment and includes thejolloJJJing: Introduction and Methodology 5 An explanation of the approach for the assessment Summary of Findings 6 Cross Tab of Deficiencies by System by Priority 6 Cross Tab of Deficiencies by Category by Priority 6 life Cycle Capital Renewal Forecast 7 Overview of Assessed Buildings 8 Overview 8 City Administrative BUilding 8 City Operations Building 9 Civic Center Exhibition BUilding 10 Parkade II Civic Center Plaza II Possible Demolition Phasing Plan and Cost 12 Assessment Findings 13 Assessment Building Facility Condition Index 13 Facility Condition Assessment Detail Reports 14 City Administrative BUilding I of25 City Operations Building I of21 Civic Center Exhibition BUilding I of20 Parkade I of 18 Civic Center Plaza I of21 Appendix A Replacement Cost Model Assumptions A Deficiency Soft Cost
    [Show full text]
  • La Mesa Civic Center Feasibility Study
    LA MESA CIVIC CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY March 2016 LA MESA CIVIC CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY A SUMMARY REPORT MARCH 29, 2016 LA MESA CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PROGRAMMATIC SUMMARY OF CONCEPTUAL 32 I. IV. SITE PLANS A. Objective B. Understanding of the Project 33 C. Consultant Team Methodology V. MARKET POTENTIAL FOR DEVELOPMENT D. Report Organization A. Demographic and Economic Trends B. Office Market Overview 2 SITE AND PLANNING CONTEXT C. Retail Market Overview II. A. Overview of Site and Planning Context D. Multi-Family Residential Market Overview B. Site Preparation and Utilities POTENTIAL FINANCING APPROACHES FOR 36 VI. CIVIC CENTER III. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANS AND FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY 6 A. Conceptual Site Plan Discussion B. Civic Center VII. LIMITING CONDITIONS 37 • PHASE I : City Hall • PHASE I : Green Space • PHASE I : Surface Parking • PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR PHASE I CIVIC COMPONENTS • PHASE II : Scenario A APPENDICES • PHASE III : Scenario A • PHASE II : Scenario B APPENDIX A – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND 38 • PHASE III : Scenario B PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE • PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR PHASE II 43 AND III CIVIC COMPONENTS APPENDIX B – OFFICE BUILDING PRO FORMA • FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF APPENDIX C – MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 46 THIRD PARTY OFFICE BUILDING PRO FORMA C. Old Police Station Site 49 APPENDIX D – ADDITIONAL PHASE III CONCEPTUAL • MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE PLANS AND RENDERINGS • FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR SCENARIOS A AND B INTRODUCTIONI A. Objective C. Consultant Team Methodology The City of La Mesa (City) engaged real estate economic consultant Keyser Marston In completing this Study, KMA and Gruen undertook the following principal work tasks: Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet-CBD-S
    CRA/LA THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT The 1,549-acre Central Business District dimension in the redevelopment of Skid Redevelopment Project, adopted on Row strongly suggests that the first step July 18, 1975, was amended by City should be that of providing decent Council and the Agency Board of housing." Commissioners on May 15, 2002. The Redevelopment Project had several Financial Core geographic sub Areas (Central City Despite the growing success of the East, Financial Core, Historic Core and neighboring Bunker Hill Redevelopment South Park) with specific revitalization Project, the area south of Fifth Street issues and development objectives. Of showed little economic development. these sub-areas, only the Financial Businesses were leaving the area, key Core, Civic Center and portions of South buildings of architectural merit were Park remain in the CBD. The remaining being abandoned and demolished. sub-areas have been incorporated into the recently adopted City Center Historic Core Redevelopment Project Area. The Broadway retail district was experiencing the loss of national Conditions at Time of Adoption retailers, while the adjacent Spring Street area was experiencing the The Central Business District had departure of office tenants. Building shown signs of deterioration and blight obsolescence, lack of parking and since the 1950's and was first studied deteriorated public facilities contributed for possible redevelopment during the to the area's blighted condition. 1960's. Central City East South Park The Central City East area was At the time of Plan adoption, only three characterized by a significant number of major structures were less than fifty substandard Single Room Occupancy years old: Occidental (now (SRO) hotels intermixed with a variety of Transamerica) Tower, the Convention industrial and warehouse structures in Center and the Holiday Inn.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockville Cemetery Brochure
    Civic Center Park City of Rockville •••••••••••••••• d a o R y r The Upper Cemetery e v A The “upper cemetery” sections at Rockville Cemetery are located on a hill. 18 34 M 37 40 12 18 43 23 44 1 12 33 36 6 13 39 42 I 49 24 6 11 17 d 23 21 22 31 22 32 Circa 1740 a 26 5 21 35 38 41 48 o 11 16 30 35 10 R 4 25 16 21 30 y 20 15 9 29 28 27 47 r 6 10 34 38 3 e 4 29 5 20 31 46 v 9 24 20 16 19 40 8 15 26 14 2 47 A / 9 46 2 45 33 37 24 45 44 6 3 28 25 5 19 43 14 42 10 23 7 41 15 1 40 19 18 40 39 39 38 13 39 38 Information for Visitors, Lot Owners, 37 8 36 37 35 36 36 2 32 34 35 4 27 7 35 33 34 34 11 2 22 ue 32 33 18 14 ven 33 31 A 32 17 rn 32 e 30 h K 23 31 12 ort 24 31 N 29 7 30 and Prospective Purchasers 30 28 1 3 28 29 8 27 29 27 28 28 12 1 13 27 27 17 ue 24 26 102 n 26 e 23 26 Av 22 25 rn 21 101 25 e 22 25 Civic Center Park orth 21 24 City of Rockville 26 100 24 24 N 25 23 99 23 City of Rockville of City 23 22 20 98 Civic Center Park Center Civic 22 22 L 19 21 21 22 97 19 21 21 20 21 20 20 96 18 20 20 15 20 19 17 19 27 95 24 23 16 19 19 94 17 18 18 18 18 93 17 17 92 17 20 17 18 19 d 18 17 16 a 91 o 16 16 R 18 14 y 15 19 18 r 21 90 17 e 26 15 22 v 15 15 N 33 A 13 14 89 16 14 14 88 13 20 13 13 87 19 12 16 15 17 E 18 18 34 M 37 12 40 86 12 43 18 12 23 12 44 20 1 33 25 36 11 6 32 13 39 42 49 16 d I 6 11 17 85 a 24 Rockville Cemetery 23 15 11 22 21 31 22 32 W o 26 5 35 41 15 11 38 48 21 11 R 16 10 16 35 11 30 10 4 17 84 y 25 21 30 r 16 47 12 20 16 29 28 27 9 e 15 19 10 14 6 10 34 38 3 A v 29 10 4 e 9 5 24 15 20 31 26 46 A 83 20 16 19 8 40
    [Show full text]
  • Market Analysis - Draft
    LAKE STEVENS CIVIC CENTER MARKET ANALYSIS - DRAFT PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY JANUARY 2021 Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Site Location ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Site Characteristics ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Demographics ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Population and Households ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Household Composition ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Income ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ECS Listings.Pdf
    SEPTEMBER 2021 Affordable and Low-Income Housing Opportunities for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities SAN FRANCISCO Please be advised that this list is only updated once a month. For the most up to date listings in San Francisco, be sure to sign up for DAHLIA e-mail alerts at housing.sfgov.org. You can also find a list of websites for Bay Area housing providers on the last page of this resource – many offer notifications for housing opportunities beyond San Francisco. PROPERTY TYPE OF UNITS / RENT ELIGIBILITY ACCESSIBILITY / AMENITIES HOW TO APPLY? 280 Fell St 1-BR: $2,267/mo Minimum income: Access: Elevator on all floor UNITS AVAILABLE 280 Fell Street (& Gough St.) 2-BR: $2,667/mo 1-BR: $4,534/mo San Francisco, CA 94102 2-BR: $5,334/mo Amenities: On-site laundry, bike Apply online via DAHLIA. room, courtyard outside *Inclusionary BMR Gough/Fell Associates program (No age Maximum income: Parking: Underground parking Application Deadline: Leasing Agent: (916) 686-4126 requirement) 1 person: $7,770/mo available at $175/mo September 3, 2021 [email protected] 2 persons: $8,879/mo at 5:00 PM *Housing Choice 3 persons: $9,991/mo Pets: Service animals only Vouchers considered 4 persons: $11,100/mo Utilities: Contact site As of 8/31/2021 Page 1 SEPTEMBER 2021 Affordable and Low-Income Housing Opportunities for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities SAN FRANCISCO The Civic 2-BR: $1,649/mo Minimum income: Access: 1 elevator located in UNIT AVAILABLE 101 Polk Street (& Hayes St.) 2-BR: $3,298/mo common area of apartment building San Francisco, CA 94102 *Inclusionary BMR Apply online via DAHLIA.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY COUNCIL REGULAR City Hall - 270 S
    CITY COUNCIL REGULAR City Hall - 270 S. River Avenue November 20, 2019 AGENDA 5:30 PM Pre-Council Meeting (Council review of agenda items. No Action Taken) 7:00 PM Council Meeting (Action to be taken by Council on the following agenda items) 1. Roll Call 2. Opening Prayer - Mayor Bocks 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Consent Agenda - Roll Call Items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and have previously been reviewed by Council, and will be enacted with one motion, unless stated otherwise by the public or a Council Member, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence. Items presented in bold are non-consent. A. Absences Excused B. Approval of Minutes 1. *November 6 regular meeting and November 13, 2019 study session. C. Oaths of Office D. Requests to Remove Items from Consent 5. Special Presentations and Recognitions from Mayor or Council 6. Special Order of the Day Organizational Meeting of the Holland City Council A. Selection of Mayor Pro Tem (Roll Call) • Mayor asks for Nominations from the floor • Roll Call on Nominees by Name • Motion to declare (Council Member) Elected Mayor Pro Tem B. Resolution on Meetings of the Council (Roll Call) C. Rules of Council (Roll Call) D. Resolution on Investments and Depositories (Roll Call) E. Continue Organization of Planning Commission (Roll Call) F. *Adoption of List of Administrative Officials to Planning Commission G.* Administrative Official to Planning Commission 7. Unfinished Business 8. Written Petitions 9. Public Comment (This is an opportunity for the public to address the Council and to make any appropriate comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk Grove Civic Center Design Guidelines
    Civic Center Design Guidelines October 2011 Design Guidelines Table of Contents Introduction/Background ...................................................................................................... 1 Vision Statement and Goals for the Civic Center .................................................................... 2 City Council Goals for Fiscal Years 2009-10 and 2010-11 ......................................................................... 2 Civic Center Program Elements ................................................................................................................ 2 How to Use These Design Guidelines ..................................................................................... 3 Variance .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Civic Center Design Guidelines ............................................................................................... 4 Section 1. General Design Principles ......................................................................................................... 4 Section 2. Site Design ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Overall Use of the Site .................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Street Presence ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 2
    ATTACHMENT 2 RICHMOND CIVIC CENTER HISTORIC STRUCTURES REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1-3 SIGNIFICANCE Brief History ...................................................................................................................................4-7 Important Persons ..........................................................................................................................7-9 Summary of Significance..............................................................................................................9-11 Integrity ......................................................................................................................................11-12 Chronology .......................................................................................................................................12 EVALUATION Historic Preservation Evaluation ...............................................................................................13-16 Site Evaluations..........................................................................................................................17-22 Building Exterior Evaluations ...................................................................................................23-28 Building Interiors .......................................................................................................................29-30 Zoned Site
    [Show full text]
  • Five Flags Civic Center
    DRAFT COPY SUMMARY OF PHASE 2A PLANNING FOR AN EXPANDED / IMPROVED FIVE FLAGS CIVIC CENTER November 5, 2019 Conventions, Sports & Leisure International 520 Nicollet Mall • Suite 520 • Minneapolis, MN 55402 • Telephone 612.294.2000 • Facsimile 612.294.2045 November 5, 2018 Ms. Marie L. Ware Leisure Services Manager City of Dubuque Leisure Services Department 2200 Bunker Hill Road Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Dear Ms. Ware: Conventions, Sports & Leisure International (CSL) and BetschAssociates have completed work related to a Phase 2A Planning effort concerning an expanded/improved Five Flags Civic Center (FFCC). The information concerning within this document and related supporting documents presents a summary of our work and is intended to assist the City and other related project stakeholders with the information necessary to make informed decisions regarding next planning steps concerning a potential major FFCC renovation/improvement project. The work and information presented in this report and its various appendices/supporting documents are based on estimates, assumptions and other information developed from industry research, data provided by the City and other local project stakeholders, outreach with existing and potential facility users, discussions with industry participants, and analysis of competitive/comparable facilities and communities. The sources of information, the methods employed, and the basis of significant estimates and assumptions are stated in this report. Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Therefore, actual results achieved will vary from those described and the variations may be material. The findings presented herein are based on analysis of present and near-term conditions in the Dubuque area as well as existing interest levels by the potential base of users for an enhanced FFCC product.
    [Show full text]