Wilmette and the Suburban Whirl : a Series of Historical Sketches of Life in the Suburb from the Turn of the Century
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Scouts Trail Information
There may be no better place to bicycle than in Illinois. From flat prairie land, to rolling hills, to towering bluffs, to breathtaking river and lakefront views-- Illinois has it all. If you haven't been on a bicycle lately, you don't know what you are missing. Hop on and take in some of the best scenery Mother Nature has to offer! Illinois is bringing more trails to you. A multi-million dollar initiative approved a few years ago continues to expand existing trails and create new ones. Here are just a few of the numerous opportunities that await you. Included are only those trails that are separated from streets and highways. Enjoy and have a safe trip! Location Length/ Intensity Other Trail and Setting Miles Surface of Use Activities 1 North Branch Bicycle Trail N. Branch Skokie Division Cook Co. FPD 20.1 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) (Wooded floodplain) skiing 2 Salt Creek Bicycle Trail Bemis Woods to Brookfield Zoo (Wooded 6.6 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) floodplain) skiing 3 Thorn Creek Bicycle Trail Thorn Creek Division Cook Co. FPD (Wooded 4.8 loop & 3.0 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) floodplain) linear skiing 4 Busse Woods Bicycle Trail Ned Brown Forest Preserve (Wooded floodplain) 11.2 loop Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) skiing 5 Arie Crown Bicycle Trail Arie Crown Forest Preserve (Wooded floodplain) 3.2 loop Limestone Moderate Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) screenings skiing 6 I & M Canal Bicycle Trail Rt. -
A History of the Rail Line in Winnetka Why Are the Train Tracks Lower in Winnetka?
A History of tHe Rail line in WinnetkA Why Are the train tracks lower in Winnetka? Grade crossings were a perennial danger in downtown Winnetka. In 1854, only two tracks existed with two trains a day. The addition of the North Shore Electric Line increased the tracks to four sets. By 1909, there were 177 daily steam engine trains and frequent commuter trains passing by and stopping in Winnetka. As rail traffic increased and the population grew, so did the number of automobiles, cyclists and pedestrians. Accidents resulted in 31 deaths and numerous injuries, but proposed solutions foundered for lack of funding. Winnetka Grade Separation Project, 1939 The “Big Ditch” construction project began in 1938 and ran from Indian Hill to Hubbard Woods. It included seven bridges Drawing of Proposed Track Depression by Village Engineer Frank A. Windes, 1906 (two for pedestrians) and three train stations along with retaining walls. Much of the excavated soil was used as landfill in Crow With the community demanding action, a funding solution was finally achieved. Island Woods. After five years of construction, the project was Of critical importance was a commitment from the Public Works Administration, headed completed in 1943. by Secretary of the Interior and Winnetkan Harold L. Ickes, to fund 45% of the project. The Village contributed 29%, and the balance was funded by the Chicago & North Western and North Shore railroad companies. The Chicago & North Western railroad was in favor of the plan, as their trains had been getting stuck on the incline between Evanston and Winnetka for decades. An additional engine was frequently sent from Evanston to push the train up the bluff into Winnetka. -
Hydraulic Modeling of Chicago Area Waterways System (CAWS)
CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDIES UIUC-ENG-2014-2016 Hydraulic Engineering Series No 101 ISSN: 0442-1744 Hydraulic Modeling of Chicago Area Waterways System (CAWS) to Assess the Impact of Hydrologic Separation on Water Levels and Potential Flooding during Extreme Rainfall Events in Chicago, Illinois Santiago Santacruz, MSc.1 Marcelo H. Garc´ıa,PhD.2 1Graduate Research Assistant 2Professor and Director, Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory Sponsored by: Under Contract: Great Lakes Commission GLC 2013-06375 Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory Dept. of Civil and Envir. Engineering University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois July 2014 Hydraulic Modeling of Chicago Area Waterways System (CAWS) to Assess the Impact of Hydrologic Separation on Water Levels and Potential Flooding during Extreme Rainfall Events in Chicago, Illinois Santiago Santacruz, MSc.1 Marcelo H. Garc´ıa,PhD.2 1Graduate Research Assistant 2Professor and Director, Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory July 2014 Executive Summary Purpose and Scope In the Chicago Area Waterways (CAWS) drainage area, there are 255 Combined Sewer Outfalls (CSO) owned by the City of Chicago, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC), and surrounding municipalities. Chicago-area CSOs discharging to the CAWS currently drain away from Lake Michigan during most wet weather conditions. Consequently, the majority of CSO events in the Chicago metropolitan area do not affect Lake Michigan. However, the gates at the waterway controlling works that separate the Chicago-area waters and Lake Michigan are opened during certain heavy rainfall events in order to prevent local flooding. At the same time, there is a growing interest in controlling the potential migration of invasive species towards the Great Lakes. -
A PDF of the February 2015 FULL
to cities throughout Illinois 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Regional Transportation Sheridan r LaSalle er D 270 and United States. Many of s C ent 421 Edens Plaza Division Division Authority es 619 272 Lake 213 sin ood u D 423 422 422 B w Clark/Division Antioch y Central these routes, combined with e Forest 423 151 a WILMETTE The Regional Transportation amie ville s n r 800W 600W 200W nonstop between Michigan/Delaware to 422 0 E/W P w GLENVIEW eeha Preserve 620 Wilmette C 421Union Pacific/North Line3rd 143 l Forest F e La Baha’i Temple Elm oll and Stockton/Arlington (2500N) a D 4th v Green Glenview Thruway buses, connect Glenview n T e k i o r Authority (RTA) provides l l s r n 626 l r l 210 Preserve o l nonstop between Michigan/Delaware bard to Waukegan, Kenosha Linden Evanston a a e l vice Dewes b e b 421 146 s r Wilmette Foster S and Lake Shore/Belmont (3200N) 35 Illinois cities. For more Dea Mil C a a 221 W financial oversight, funding, and R Glenview Rd 94 Hi 422 e w L e i-State Cedar i Chicago nonstop between Delaware/Michigan Downtown Rand r v Emerson D 221 Oakton 270 Central au e Hill T e 70 147 information, visit www. Ryan Field & Welsh-Ryan Arena b and Marine/Foster (5200N) r k Cook Co regional transit planning for the a Comm ee okie 213 Central r k Courts Central 213 r nonstop between Delaware/Michigan 93 Sheridan College a Amtrak.com Presence 422 S Gross 201 H C 148 Old Orchard 206 C L Bellevue and Marine/Irving Park (4000N) Dee three public transit operations in yman Northwestern Univ Huber Central St/ o r 270 Point o -
Simulation of Scenarios to Meet Dissolved Oxygen Standards in the Chicago Waterway System Yaping Ao Marquette University
Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Simulation of Scenarios to Meet Dissolved Oxygen Standards in the Chicago Waterway System Yaping Ao Marquette University Recommended Citation Ao, Yaping, "Simulation of Scenarios to Meet Dissolved Oxygen Standards in the Chicago Waterway System" (2010). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 45. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/45 SIMULATION OF SCENARIOS TO MEET DISSOLVED OXYGEN STANDARDS IN THE CHICAGO WATERWAY SYSTEM by Yaping Ao, B.E. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of the Master of Science Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT SIMULATION OF SCENARIOS TO MEET DISSOLVED OXYGEN STANDARDS IN THE CHICAGO WATERWAY SYSTEM Yaping Ao, B.E. Marquette University, 2010 Although most reaches of the Chicago Waterway System (CWS) meet the General Use Water Quality Standards a high percentage of the time, dissolved oxygen (DO) standards are not met in the CWS during some periods for both the WYs 2001 and 2003 as representative of wet and dry years. Several methods were used to solve this problem; however, they were inadequate for achieving the proposed DO standards. Therefore, a method of integrating the alternative DO remediation methods into one integrated strategy for improving water quality is considered in this study. The main purpose of this study is the application of the DUFLOW model to improve DO concentrations in the CWS during the WYs 2001 and 2003. Two sets of DO standards needed to be achieved: 90 and 100% compliance with the IEPA’s proposed DO standards, and the MWRDGC’s proposed DO standards. -
NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS and TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM an Executive Summary*
T I HE G MPLEMENTATION G N And the Illinois DepartmentAnd the Resources of Natural REENWAY ORTHEASTERN REENWAYS the Forest Preserve of Cook County District Forest the I was LLINOIS Adopted by NIPC. June 19, 1997 NIPC. June 19, by Adopted N REENWAYS LANNING Illinois Prairie Trail Authority, Illinois Prairie Trail and additional support from G ORTHEASTERN O A P With funding from With the A ROGRAM PENLANDS ND ND A M P I Developed by Developed EGIONAL LLINOIS T S R R LLINOIS A is a nonprofit RAIL AP UMMARY ND A Recognizing the Recognizing I P : O P EGIONAL was created in 1957 by in 1957 created was ROJECT LLINOIS O ND LANNING I F P ROJECT PPORTUNITIES MPLEMENTATION T P I ROGRAM (NIPC) northeastern illinois planning commission C RAILS ORTHEASTERN OMMISSION RAILS ORTHEASTERN N T N PENLANDS CKNOWLEDGMENTS OMMISSION HE ND HE T C be the Illinois General Assemblythe to advisory planning agency comprehensive six-county Chicago metropolitan the for Illinois Planning area. The Northeastern charges: Commission three the gave Act conduct research and collect data for To local advise and assist planning; to prepare comprehensive and to government; development guide the plans and policies to Kane, counties of Cook, of the DuPage, McHenryLake, and Will. O protecting, to organization dedicated and enhancing open space - expanding, natural a healthy provide - to land and water place for and a more livable environment region. people of the all the A importance of of a region-wide network Authority Illinois Prairie Trail trails, the Illinois Northeastern the with contracted Planning Commission and Openlands Project Regional of the an update develop to funds were Plan. -
Melaniphy & Associates Retail Market Study & Store Strategy Analysis
RETAIL MARKET STUDY AND STORE STRATEGY ANALYSIS VERNON HILLS, ILLINOIS Prepared For: VILLAGE OF VERNON HILLS VERNON HILLS, ILLINOIS FEBRUARY, 2019 John C. Melaniphy email: [email protected] President February 25, 2019 Mr. Mike Atkinson Building Commissioner Village of Vernon Hills 290 Evergreen Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061 In re: Retail Market Study and Store Strategy Hawthorn Center and Retail Sites Vernon Hills, Illinois Dear Mr. Atkinson: We have completed our Market Feasibility Study and Store Strategy Analysis to determine the appropriate strategy for Hawthorn center and to direct the mix of restaurants, retailers, entertainment venues, residential, and guide the overall success of the envisioned mixed-use redevelopment. We have also completed our review of the Village’s development sites to determine their overall market potential and the types of retailers best suited to meet market demand. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to assist the Village of Vernon Hills and in the orderly redevelopment of Hawthorn Center and Village’s retail base. MELANIPHY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6348 North Milwaukee Avenue, #198, Chicago, Illinois 60646 (773) 467-1212 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Number Title Page Number I ASSIGNMENT 1 Objectives 1 Assumptions 3 II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Department Stores 5 Retail Bankruptcies and Store Closings 6 Hawthorn Center 7 Core Mall Markets 8 Top 20 Suburbs 8 Internet Sales 8 Shopping Center Construction 9 Chicago Metropolitan Area Retail Vacancy 11 Rental Rates 12 National, Regional, and Local Retail Trends 12 Expanding Retailers 14 Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics 15 Vernon Hills Retail Sales Experience 15 Major Mall, Stores, Big Boxes, and Other Sales Tax Generators 17 Trade Area Delineation 18 Vernon Hills Market Penetration 20 Vernon Hills Retail Sales Forecast 22 Retail Market Strategy 22 ◼ Hawthorn Mall – NWC Milwaukee Ave. -
Bike Master Plan
W INNETKA Bikeway Master Plan APRIL 2012 ,\ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS Park and Recreation Board Task Force Committee Special Thanks To Project Team 05 Executive Summary Richard Pierce, President Terry Schwartz, Executive Director GIS Consortium 07 Research and Analysis Winnetka Park District Brad McLane, Vice President Cook County Government 17 Opportunities and Challenges Robert Smith, Superintendent of Parks Department of Geographic Information Systems John DiCola, Commissioner Winnetka Park District 21 Recommendations Edward Harney, Commissioner Tom Gullen, Superintendent of Facilities 35 Implementation Strategy Winnetka Park District Gerri Kahnweiler, Commissioner 45 Appendix A: Funding Matrix Patrick Kreis, Police Chief Ian Larkin, Commissioner Village of Winnetka 49 Appendix B: Community Bicycle Network Maps John Thomas, Commissioner Susan Chen, Assistant Village Engineer 53 Appendix C: East - West Connector Trail Options Village of Winnetka 57 Appendix D: Public Meeting Comments Don Maloney, President Bike Winnetka Barb Cornew Active Transportation Alliance and Winnetka Resident Terry Dason Chamber of Commerce Bill Mckinley BMO Harris Bank Larry Faulkner Green Bay Cycles Eric Chan Greeley / Washburne School On the Cover Brian Miller Photo of Winnetka Avenue, just West of Sheridan Road. Office of Cook County Commissioner Larry Suffredin 2 WINNETKA BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride.” -John F. Kennedy In the age of rising oil prices, increased concern for the impact of While many of Winnetka’s residents and visitors currently bicycle within automobile pollution on the environment, and the heightened the community, many more would do the same if new improvements awareness for physical well-being, bicycling is steadily becoming a such as signed bicycle routes, bike lanes, and bicycle parking were more popular mode of travel for many. -
Chicago Transit Authority (CTA)
06JN023apr 2006.qxp 6/21/2006 12:37 PM Page 1 All Aboard! Detailed Fare Information First Bus / Last Bus Times All CTA and Pace buses are accessible X to people with disabilities. This map gives detailed information about Chicago Transit # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. Authority bus and elevated/subway train service, and shows Type of Fare* Full Reduced Reduced fares are for: You can use this chart to determine days, hours and frequency of service, and Fare Payment Farareboebox Topop where each route begins and ends. BROADWAY DIVISION ILLINOIS CENTER/NORTH WESTERN EXPRESS Pace suburban bus and Metra commuter train routes in the 36 70 Division/Austin east to Division/Clark 4:50a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 122 CASH FARE Accepted on buses only. $2 $1 Devon/Clark south to Polk/Clark 4:00a-12:10a 4:20a-12:00m 4:20a-12:15a Canal/Washington east to Wacker/Columbus 6:40a-9:15a & CTA service area. It is updated twice a year, and available at CTA Children 7 through 11 BUSES: CarCardsds It shows the first and last buses in each direction on each route, traveling Polk/Clark north to Devon/Clark 4:55a-1:20a 4:55a-1:05a 4:50a-1:15a Division/Clark west to Division/Austin 5:30a-1:20a 5:40a-1:20a 5:45a-1:20a 3:40p-6:10p Exact fare (both coins and bills accepted). No cash transfers available. years old. -
2017 Annual Report Table of Contents
The Power of We. THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST 2017 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS In Appreciation: Terry Mazany . 2 Year in Review . 4 Our Stories: Philanthropy in Action . 8 In Memoriam . 20 Competitive Grants . 22 Grants from the Searle Funds at The Chicago Community Trust . 46 Searle Scholars . 47 Donor Advised Grants . 48 Designated Grants . 76 Matching Gifts . 77 Grants from Identity-Focused Funds . 78 Grants from Supporting Organizations . 80 Grants from Collaborative Funds . 84 Funds of The Chicago Community Trust and Affiliates . 87 Contributors to Funds at The Chicago Community Trust and Affiliates . 99 The 1915 Society . 108 Professional Advisory Committee and Young Professional Advisory Committee . 111 Financial Highlights . 112 Executive Committee . 116 Trustees Committee and Banks . 117 The Chicago Community Trust Staff . 118 Trust at a Glance . 122 The power to reach. The power to dream. The power to build, uplift and create. The power to move the immovable, to align our reality to the best of our ideals. That is the power of we. We know that change doesn’t happen in silos. From our beginning, The Chicago Community Trust has understood that more voices, more minds, more hearts are better than one. It is our collective actions, ideas and generosity that propel us forward together. We find strength in our differences, common ground in our unparalleled love for our region. We take courage knowing that any challenge we face, we face as one. We draw power from our shared purpose, power that renews and emboldens us on our journey – the world-changing power of we. Helene D. -
Fish Surveys in the Lake Michigan Basin 1996-2006: Chicago and Calumet River Sub-Basins
Region Watershed Program 5931 Fox River Drive Plano, Illinois 60548 Fish Surveys in the Lake Michigan Basin 1996-2006: Chicago and Calumet River Sub-basins Stephen M. Pescitelli and Robert C. Rung August 2009 Summary For all 16 stations sampled in 2006 we collected 1,995 fish, representing 35 species from 11 families. No threatened or endangered species were encountered. Four non- native species were present, including common carp, goldfish, white perch, and round goby. No Asian carp were collected or observed. The number of species and relative abundance was very similar for the 9 stations collected in both 2001 and 2006. Only 3 stations were sampled in 1996, yielding 17 species and 158 individuals. None of the stations sampled in 1996 were included in the subsequent surveys due to access problems, however, species compositions for 1996 were similar to the 2001 and 2006 studies. Stream quality was relatively low for all Chicago River sub-basin stations. North Shore Channel (HCCA-02) had the highest IBI score; 22 on a scale of 0-60. The lowest score was found on the West Fork of the North Branch (HCCB-13), where only 4 native species were collected, resulting in an IBI of 9. Three stations were sampled in the Chicago River sub-basin in both 2001 and 2006 surveys, and showed very similar IBI scores in both years with differences in IBI of 4 points or less. The one station sampled in 1996 on the North Branch was at Touhy Avenue and had an IBI of 14. Stream quality ratings were also low for the Calumet River sub-basin. -
Detailed Watershed Plan for the North Branch of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan Watershed: Volume 1
Final Report Detailed Watershed Plan for the North Branch of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan Watershed: Volume 1 Prepared for Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago January 2011 Detailed Watershed Plan for the North Branch of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan Watershed Prepared for: Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago 100 E. Erie Street Chicago, Illinois 6011 Prepared by: HDR Engineering, Inc. in conjunction with: 2IM Group, LLC Cushing and Company FluidClarity, Ltd. Huff & Huff, Inc. Lin Engineering, Ltd. M.P.R. Engineering, Corp., Inc. V3 Companies of Illinois Ltd. Contents Volume 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. III Background .................................................................................................................................. III Detailed Watershed Plan Scope ................................................................................................ III Watershed Overview .................................................................................................................. IV Existing Conditions Evaluation ................................................................................................ IV Evaluation of Alternatives ...................................................................................................... VIII Recommendations...................................................................................................................