Floodsite Project Report D22.3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Floodsite Project Report D22.3 Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies Scenario Analysis THE IMPACT OF EXTREME PRECIPITATION PATTERNS ON THE FLOOD PEAKS ALONG THE TISZA RIVER Date March 2007 Report Number T22-07-03 Revision Number 1_3_P01 Task Leader VITUKI, Budapest FLOODsite is co-funded by the European Community Sixth Framework Programme for European Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) FLOODsite is an Integrated Project in the Global Change and Eco-systems Sub-Priority Start date March 2004, duration 5 Years Document Dissemination Level PU Public PU PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Co-ordinator: HR Wallingford, UK Project Contract No: GOCE-CT-2004-505420 Project website: www.floodsite.net Scenario Analysis M22.2 Contract No:GOCE-CT-2004-505420 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Scenario Analysis, The Impact of Extreme Precipitation Patterns on Title the Flood Peaks along the Tisza River Authors Balázs Gauzer, Gábor Bálint, Péter Bartha Péter Bakonyi, András Bárdossy, András Csík, Miklós Domokos, Contributors Zoltán Kling, József Szilágyi Distribution Public Document Reference T22-07-03 DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Revision Prepared by Organisation Approved by Notes 22/03/07 1_1_P21 GAB VITUKI Initial draft 22/01/08 1_2_P21 GAB VITUKI Final 15/05/09 1_3_P01 J Rance HR Formatting for publication Wallingford 27/05/09 1_3_P01 Paul Samuels HR Allocated agains correct Milestone Wallingford M22.2 not D22.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described in this publication was supported by the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrated Project FLOODsite, Contract GOCE-CT- 2004-505420. DISCLAIMER This document reflects only the authors’ views and not those of the European Community. This work may rely on data from sources external to the members of the FLOODsite project Consortium. Members of the Consortium do not accept liability for loss or damage suffered by any third party as a result of errors or inaccuracies in such data. The information in this document is provided “as is” and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The user thereof uses the information at its sole risk and neither the European Community nor any member of the FLOODsite Consortium is liable for any use that may be made of the information. © Members of the FLOODsite Consortium T22_07_03_Scenario_Analysis_D22_3_V1_3_P01 15 May 2009 ii Scenario Analysis M22.2 Contract No:GOCE-CT-2004-505420 SUMMARY In the course of the present work, it was investigated, what a hydrological situation would be created in the catchment area of the Tisza River by the occurrence of certain meteorological and hydrological scenarios, having real chances to happen. In the course of our investigations, from among the great Tisza floods experienced during the last decades, that of 1970 (differing in many aspects from all other floods), that of 1998 (triggered mainly by precipitations of high intensity) and that of 1999 (originating mostly from snowmelt) were selected for a more detailed analysis. – As a first step, the mathematical models adopted for carrying out the simulation investigations were briefly presented. – Thereafter, a brief description of the river system investigated followed and the floods occurring therein during the the last decades were surveyed. – In the next chapter, the generating causes and the main features of the floods of 1970, 1998, and 1999 were analysed. – Finally, the situations resulting, according to our calculations, from the various scenarios were presented in detail. Prior to investigate the selected scenarios, it was intended to demonstrate the reliability of the simulation model to be adopted therefore by the computative reconstruction of the water level and discharge time series of the three selected flood waves. There was a very good agreement between the observed time series and their corresponding ones produced by adopting the simulation model, particularly concerning the peak water levels, most important for the present investigation. Thus the adoptability of the mathematical model was demonstrated. This report contributes to Milestone M22.2 of Task 22 of FLOODsite. T22_07_03_Scenario_Analysis_D22_3_V1_3_P01 15 May 2009 iii Scenario Analysis M22.2 Contract No:GOCE-CT-2004-505420 CONTENTS Document Information ii Document History ii Acknowledgement ii Disclaimer ii Summary iii Contents v 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 General ...................................................................................................................................1 1.2 A brief presentation of the river system investigated, and the most important floods on the Tisza River during the last decades ........................................................................................3 1.2.1 The Tisza Basin .........................................................................................................3 1.2.2 Hydrological features of the flood of 1970 ...............................................................6 1.2.3 Hydrological features of the flood of 1998 ...............................................................8 1.2.4 Hydrological features of the flood of 1999 .............................................................10 2. Investigation of Weather Patterns Leading to Floods .......................................................................13 Type West (W) .....................................................................................................................13 Type West with peripheric storm (Wp) ................................................................................14 Zonal type (Z).......................................................................................................................14 Moving Mediterranean Cyclone (M)....................................................................................14 Central Type (C)...................................................................................................................14 Western Cyclone Type (CW) ................................................................................................15 Type ‘Cold Cell’ (H) ............................................................................................................16 3. The VITUKI – NHFS hydrological modelling system .....................................................................23 3.1 The HOOLV Snowmelt Model ............................................................................................23 3.1.1 The energy balance method and the temperature index method .............................24 3.1.2 Calculating of the energy terms...............................................................................25 3.2 The TAPI Rainfall-Runoff Model ........................................................................................28 3.3 The Discrete Linear Cascade Model.....................................................................................30 4. Analysis of the Consequences of Hypothetical Meteorological and Hydrological Scenarios ..........34 4.1 Overview of the flood waves investigated............................................................................34 4.2 Overview of the scenarios investigated ................................................................................36 4.2.1 Scenario 1: No levee failures upstream of Tiszabecs during the flood of 1998 ......37 4.2.2 Scenario 2: No levee failures along the Szamos River in 1970...............................37 4.2.3 Scenario 3: During the flood of 1970, no levee failures along the Szamos river, and the flood wave of the Szamos reaches the mouth 12 hours later than observed39 4.2.4 Scenario 4: The intensive precipitation activity preceding the flood wave of 1998 covers the whole sub-catchment of the Tiszabecs cross-section.....................40 4.2.5 Scenario 5 The intensive precipitation activity preceding the flood wave of 1998 covers, both the sub-catchments of the Upper Tisza river, and also that of the Szamos river....................................................................................................43 4.2.6 Scenario 6 The Upper Tisza flood wave of November 1998 coincides with the flood wave of the river network of the Bodrog River .....................................45 4.2.7 Scenario 7 The precipitation amount over the sub-catchment of the Tisza upstream of the Tokaj gauge exceeds that of in March 1999 .........................................48 4.2.8 Scenario 8 The intensive precipitation activity preceding the flood wave of November 1998 covers also catchments of the Körös and/or Maros rivers....54 5. Conclusions.......................................................................................................................................60 T22_07_03_Scenario_Analysis_D22_3_V1_3_P01 15 May 2009 v Scenario Analysis M22.2 Contract No:GOCE-CT-2004-505420 5.1 Review of Scenario Analysis................................................................................................60 5.2 Basic results linked to different hydrometeorological situations..........................................60 5.3 Basic results of the investigations
Recommended publications
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2009 with the Support of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany & the Conference of European Rabbis
    Lo Tishkach Foundation European Jewish Cemeteries Initiative Avenue Louise 112, 2nd Floor | B-1050 Brussels | Belgium Telephone: +32 (0) 2 649 11 08 | Fax: +32 (0) 2 640 80 84 E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.lo-tishkach.org The Lo Tishkach European Jewish Cemeteries Initiative was established in 2006 as a joint project of the Conference of European Rabbis and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany. It aims to guarantee the effective and lasting preservation and protection of Jewish cemeteries and mass graves throughout the European continent. Identified by the Hebrew phrase Lo Tishkach (‘do not forget’), the Foundation is establishing a comprehensive publicly-accessible database of all Jewish burial grounds in Europe, currently featuring details on over 9,000 Jewish cemeteries and mass graves. Lo Tishkach is also producing a compendium of the different national and international laws and practices affecting these sites, to be used as a starting point to advocate for the better protection and preservation of Europe’s Jewish heritage. A key aim of the project is to engage young Europeans, bringing Europe’s history alive, encouraging reflection on the values that are important for responsible citizenship and mutual respect, giving a valuable insight into Jewish culture and mobilising young people to care for our common heritage. Preliminary Report on Legislation & Practice Relating to the Protection and Preservation of Jewish Burial Grounds Hungary Prepared by Andreas Becker for the Lo Tishkach Foundation in February 2009 with the support of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany & the Conference of European Rabbis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
    165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal,
    [Show full text]
  • Legendák Nyomában Az Észak-Alföldön
    „Legendák” nyomában az Észak-Alföldön www.itthon.hu Kedves Vendégünk! Az Észak-alföldi régió számos településéhez kötődik valamilyen legenda, rege, ballada, vagy egyszerűen csak egy érdekes történet, amely szájról szájra terjedve maradt ránk. Jelen kiadványunkban összegyűjtöttünk néhány történetet, ame- lyeket egy-egy útvonalba szerkesztve, látnivalókkal, szabadidős, program- és szállásajánlatokkal összekapcsolva tárunk Ön elé. Ajánlatunktól természetesen el lehet térni, mindenki a saját ízlésének, érdeklődésének megfelelően alakíthatja programját, az élmények színvonalán ez nem változtat. Jó szórakozást és kellemes legendavadászatot kívánunk! Útmutató Tisza . . útvonal: Vásárosnamény – Tarpa – Nagyar – Szatmárcseke – Milota – Jánkmajtis – Penyige – Vásárosnamény . . útvonal: Mátészalka – Tunyogmatolcs – Vállaj – Mérk – Vaja – Mátészalka . . útvonal: Kisvárda – Tuzsér – Zsurk – Lónya – Lövőpetri – Kisvárda . . útvonal: Nyíregyháza – Nagykálló – Nyírbátor – Máriapócs – Nyíregyháza . . útvonal: Nyíregyháza – Kótaj – Ibrány – Nagyhalász – Tiszabercel – Szabolcs – Tiszadob – Nyíregyháza . . útvonal: Debrecen – Nyíracsád – Hajdúhadház – Hajdúnánás – Hajdúböszörmény – Debrecen. . útvonal: Hajdúszoboszló – Nagykereki – Hencida – Berettyóújfalu – Hajdúszoboszló. . útvonal: Hortobágy – Nádudvar – Hajdúszoboszló – Balmazújváros – Hortobágy . . útvonal: Jászberény – Jásztelek – Jászjákóhalma – Jászárokszállás – Jászfényszaru – Jászberény. . útvonal: Szolnok – Törökszentmiklós – Kétpó – Mezőtúr – Túrkeve – Kisújszállás – Szolnok . . útvonal:
    [Show full text]
  • Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Kormányhivatal
    SZABOLCS-SZATMÁR-BEREG MEGYEI KORMÁNYHIVATAL Fehérgyarmati Járási Földhivatal T Á J É K O Z T A T Ó A Fehérgyarmati Járási Földhivatal a 405/2012. (XII. 28.) Kormányrendelet 1. § (4) szerint az alábbiakat teszi közzé: 4901 Fehérgyarmat Tömöttvár u. 14. Tel: 06/44/510-850 44/510-851 E-mail: [email protected] Honlap: szabolcs.foldhivatal.hu H: 8:00-12:00, K:8:00-12:00, 13:00-15:00, Sz: 8:00-12:00, 13:00-15:00, Cs: -, P: 8:00-12:00 I. A Fehérgyarmati Járási Földhivatal illetékességi területén lévő települések teljesítési sorrendje. A teljesítési sorrend meghatározása a Fehérgyarmati Körzeti Földhivatal 2005-ben kisorsolt települési sorrendjének, valamint a Vásárosnaményi Járási Földhivataltól 2013. évben átcsatolt Tivadar település 2005-ben kisorsolt sorszámának betűrend szerinti összefűzésével történt. 1 . TÚRRICSE 34 . DARNÓ 2 . VÁMOSOROSZI 35 . HERMÁNSZEG 3 . PANYOLA 36 . MÁND 4 . MAGOSLIGET 37 . KISPALÁD 5 . NÁBRÁD 38 . SZAMOSSÁLYI 6 . MÉHTELEK 39 . KÖMÖRŐ 7 . NAGYSZEKERES 40 . SZAMOSÚJLAK 8 . NAGYAR 41 . CÉGÉNYDÁNYÁD 9 . KÖLCSE 42 . KÉRSEMJÉN 10 . TIVADAR 43 . BOTPALÁD 11 . CSAHOLC 44 . ZAJTA 12 . TISZABECS 45 . TUNYOGMATOLCS 13 . NEMESBORZOVA 46 . NAGYHÓDOS 14 . FEHÉRGYARMAT 47 . KISHÓDOS 15 . OLCSVAAPÁTI 48 . KISSZEKERES 16 . FÜLESD 49 . TISZTABEREK 17 . SZATMÁRCSEKE 50 . ROZSÁLY 18 . SONKÁD 19 . PENYIGE 20 . ZSAROLYÁN 21 . TISZACSÉCSE 22 . MILOTA 23 . USZKA 24 . JÁNKMAJTIS 25 . GACSÁLY 26 . GYÜGYE 27 . TÚRISTVÁNDI 28 . GARBOLC 29 . KISAR 30 . TISZAKÓRÓD 31 . CSÁSZLÓ 32 . KISNAMÉNY . 33 CSEGÖLD 36 2 / II. A részarány kiadás
    [Show full text]
  • Adományozó Neve, Székhelye Adomány Leírása, Értéke Adomány
    Adományozó neve, Adomány leírása, értéke Adomány elfogadójának Adomány célja, rendeltetése székhelye megnevezése, székhelye Beszterec Község Kemecse Rendőrőrs Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Önkormányzata használatában lévő szolgálati 100.000 Ft Rendőr-főkapitányság 4488 Beszterec, gépjárművekhez üzemanyag 4400 Nyíregyháza, Bujtos u. 2. Kossuth u. 42. vásárlás Fehérgyarmati Rendőrkapitányság Fehérgyarmat Város használatában lévő szolgálati Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Önkormányzata gépjárművek részére Rendőr-főkapitányság 4900 Fehérgyarmat, 150 000 Ft biztosított többlet 4400 Nyíregyháza, Kiss E. u.2. üzemanyag fokozott Bujtos u.2. járőrszolgálat ellátása céljából Fehérgyarmat Város területén. Mátészalka Rendőrkapitányság, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Jármi Község Közrendvédelmi Osztály, Rendőr-főkapitányság Önkormányzata 120 000 Ft KMB Alosztály, Vaja körzeti 4400 Nyíregyháza, 4337 Jármi, Kölcsey u. 14. megbízott szakmai Bujtos u.2. munkájának elősegítése, túlórakeretének finanszírozása. Nyíregyháza Rendőrkapitányság, Rakamaz Rakamaz Város Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Rendőrőrs használatában Önkormányzata Rendőr-főkapitányság 200 000 Ft lévő szolgálati gépjárművek 4465 Rakamaz, 4400 Nyíregyháza, részére üzemanyag Szent István út 116. Bujtos u.2. vásárlásra,az illetékességi területen fokozott járőrszolgálat ellátása végett. Fehérgyarmati Rendőrkapitányság használatában lévő szolgálati Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Fehérgyarmat Város gépjárművek részére Rendőr-főkapitányság Önkormányzata 1 000 000 Ft biztosított többlet 4400 Nyíregyháza,
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY CLEAR SUMMARY Roden Co. Ltd
    M49 expressway, section between Ököritófülpös - country border M49 EXPRESSWAY M3 HIGHWAY, SECTION BETWEEN ÖKÖRITÓFÜLPÖS SECTION 21+510 KM - AND THE COUNTRY BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY CLEAR SUMMARY Investor: NIF National Instructure Development Private Limited Company Client: Roden Co. Ltd. Seat - 1089 Budapest Villám str. 13. Contact Person - Béla Felméri, architecture with diploma Vibrocomp topic number - 093/2018 Vibrocomp representative - dr Mrs. Pál Bite | File name - 49_KHT_KÖF.pdf. .pdf M49 expressway, section between Ököritófülpös - country border PARTICIPATED IN THE ELABORATION OF THE DOCUMENT VIROSOME Acoustic and Computer Technology Commercial and Service Co. Ltd. Seat: 1118 Budapest, Bozókvár str 12. E-mail: [email protected] Phone: + 36 1 3107292 // Fax: + 36 1 3196303 Web: www.vibrocomp.com Vibrocomp Co. Ltd. environmental protection engineer with Dr. Mrs. Pál Bite MMK: 01-0193 OKTF: Sz-035/2009 diploma Tímea Bencsik MMK: 01-14704 OKTF: Sz-010/2013. landscape engineer with diploma regional and settlement development Szabolcs Silló MMK: 13-13573 OKTF: Sz-036/2009 professional geographer with diploma chemical engineer with diploma Ibolya Benkő environmental protection engineer with diploma Zsuzsanna Bolla environmental engineer with diploma Tímea Erdei landscape engineer with diploma Mrs. Kelemen Éva Ruckerbauer landscape engineer with diploma Enikő Kiss environmental engineer with diploma Gyula Kolozsvári environmental engineer with diploma Dániel Szilveszter Nagy mechanical engineer with diploma Sándor Nagy electric engineer with diploma geospatial professional engineer with Szabolcs Nerpel diploma Éva Váradi agricultural engineer with diploma Participated: OKTF: SZ-084/2010. Csaba Varga biologist-ecologist with diploma OKTF: Sz-003/2015. Responsible designer: environmental protection engineer Dr. Mrs. Pál Bite MMK: 01-0193 OKTF: Sz-035/2009 with diploma 2 M49 expressway, section between Ököritófülpös - country border CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Professional Topics of the Gift Management Programme Called 'Geography and Youth Tourism' and the Working up and Rese
    1. The professional topics of the gift management programme called ’Geography and youth tourism’ and the working up and research plans Lessons The content of the gift management programme 1.-2. The professional topics of the gift management programme called ’Geography and youth tourism’ and the working up and research plans 3.-4. An outline of the physical geography of Hungary and Romania 5.-6. An outline of the historical and human geography of Hungary and Romania 7.-8. An outline of the physical geography of Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county (Hungary) and Szatmár county (Romania) 9.-10. An outline of the historical and human geography of Szabolcs-Szatmár- Bereg county (Hungary) and Szatmár county (Romania) 11.-12. The geography and history of the county towns, Nyíregyháza (Szabolcs- Szatmár-Bereg county) and Szatmárnémeti (Szatmár county) 13.-14. Youth tourism in the system of tourist industry. Typical forms of youth tourism. 15.-16. Typical forms of youth tourism in the Eötvös Practice School (Nyíregyháza) and in the School number 10 (Szatmárnémeti) 17.-18. Drawing up the favourable conditions for tourism and the tourist attractions in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county (Hungary) and Szatmár county (Romania) 19.-20. Drawing up the favourable conditions for tourism and the tourist attractions in Nyíregyháza (Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county) and Szatmárnémeti (Szatmár county) 21.-22. Making an itinerary and organizing programmes for youth tourism in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county 23.-24. Making an itinerary and organizing programmes for youth tourism in Szatmár county 25.-26. Organizing programmes for tourists in Nyíregyháza (Szabolcs-Szatmár- Bereg county) 27. -28. Organizing programmes for tourists in Szatmárnémeti (Szatmár county) 29.–30.
    [Show full text]
  • Az Észak-Alföld Vasúti Közlekedési Hálózata Passenger Train Services
    02-521-14 Az Észak-Alföld vasúti közlekedési hálózata Чоп / Čop (Csap) УЗ Passenger train services of the Northern Great Plain Україна Ł Záhony Eperjeske alsó Ukrajna Tiszabezdéd Mándok Érvényes: 2013. XII. 15-től / Valid from 15.12.2013 98 Abaújszántó Tuzsér Tornyospálca Komoró Újkenéz 111 ombor 80 Sárospatak, Sátoraljaújhely Fényeslitke zőz Kisvárda-Hármasút Aranyosapáti Szerencs Me Kisvárda Gyüre Ajak Kisvarsány Miskolc-Tiszai Tarcal 80 Pátroha Budapest-Keleti Tokaj Vásárosnamény Gégény Rakamaz Vásárosnamény külső Demecser 80 Nyírmada Vitka Virányos Kék t 111 Nyírbogdány arma es Nagydobos er A MÁV-START Zrt. nem vállal felelősséget a más közlekedési társaságok által Bashalom Görögszállás Kemecse Rákóczitanya ek Tunyogmatolcs ehérgy yige es szolgáltatott adatok (így pl. autóbuszcsatlakozások) helyességéért. F en er Tiszaeszlár Sóstóhegy Vaja-Rohod Ópályi alsó P Nagysz ek Egyes vonatok – menetrend szerint – egyes állomásokat, megállóhelyeket 100 116 Nyírtelek Mátészalka Kissz zsály kihagynak. A vonatok közlekedésében időszakos változások előfordulhatnak. Kisfástanya Baktalórántháza JánkmajtisGacsály Ro Zajta 117 Füzesbokor Tunyogmatolcs A rendszeresen frissített változat a www.mav-start.hu/terkepek oldalon érhető el, Hajnalos Sóstó -Magy egyháza külső or Ligettanya 113 vagy a kódmező okostelefonnal történő beolvasásával. os elek Nyíregyháza Nyír Or Napk Apagy Lev d Győrtelek MÁV-START takes no responsibility for data provided by other transport companies, Tiszalök 113 d alsó Ófehértó Nyírmeggyes Kocsor such as bus/coach connections. Certain trains may skip some stops according ocsor Győrtelek alsó Szorgalmatos 110 115 K to schedule. Services are subject to temporary alterations. For the up-to-date version of Nagykálló Hodász Nyírcsaholy 114 Ököritófülpös this map please visit www.mav-start.hu/terkepek or scan the code.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development PROGRAMME
    Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development PROGRAMME-COMPLEMENT (PC) to the AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME (ARDOP) (2004-2006) Budapest June 2009 ARDOP PC modified by the ARDOP MC on 7 March 2006 and by written procedures on 18 August, 29 September 2006 and on 14 August 2007, revised according to the comments of the European Commission (ref.:AGRI 004597of 06.02.2007, AGRI 022644 of 05.09.07 and AGRI 029995 of 22.11 07.) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 I.1 PROGRAMME COMPLEMENT....................................................................... 5 I.2 THE MANAGING AUTHORITY for ARDOP.................................................. 6 I.2.1 General description......................................................................................... 6 I.2.2 The MANAGING AUTHORITY in Hungary................................................ 6 I.2.3 Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 6 I.2.4 Financial Management and Control Arrangements ........................................ 6 I.2.5 Monitoring the capacities................................................................................ 6 I.3 THE PAYING AUTHORITY............................................................................. 6 I.4 THE INTERMEDIATE BODY .......................................................................... 6 I.5 THE FINAL BENEFICIARIES.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Abod Aggtelek Ajak Alap Anarcs Andocs Apagy Apostag Arka
    Bakonszeg Baks Baksa Anarcs Andocs Abod Balajt Apagy Balaton Apostag Aggtelek Ajak Arka Balsa Alap Barcs Basal 50 Biharkeresztes Biharnagybajom Battonya Bihartorda Biharugra Bikal Biri Bekecs Botykapeterd Bocskaikert Bodony Bucsa Bodroghalom Buj Belecska Beleg Bodrogkisfalud Bodrogolaszi Benk sa Bojt Cece Bokor Beret Boldogasszonyfa Cered Berkesz Berzence Boldva Besence Csaholc Bonnya Beszterec Csaroda Borota 51 Darvas Csehi Csehimindszent Dunavecse Csengele Demecser Csenger Ecseg Csengersima Derecske Ecsegfalva Detek Egeralja Devecser Egerbocs Egercsehi Doba Egerfarmos Csernely Doboz Egyek Csipkerek Dombiratos Csobaj Csokonyavisonta Encs Encsencs Endrefalva Enying Eperjeske Dabrony Damak 52 Erk Geszt Furta Etes Gige Golop Fancsal Farkaslyuk Fegyvernek Gadna Gyugy Garadna Garbolc Fiad Gelej Fony Gemzse Halmaj 53 Hangony Hantos Hirics Hobol Hedrehely Hegymeg Homrogd Hejce Hencida Hencse Ibafa Heresznye Igar Igrici Iharos Ilk Kaba Imola Inke Iregszemcse Irota Heves Istenmezeje Hevesaranyos Kamond 54 Kamut Kisdobsza Kelebia Kemecse Kapoly Kemse Kishuta Kenderes Kiskinizs Kaposszerdahely Kengyel Kiskunmajsa Karancsalja Kerta Kismarja Karancskeszi Kispirit Kevermes Karcag Karcsa Kisar Karos Kisasszond Kistelek Kisasszonyfa Kaszaper Kisbajom Kisvaszar Kisberzseny Kisszekeres Kisbeszterce 55 Liget Kocsord Krasznokvajda Litka Kokad Kunadacs Litke Kunbaja Kuncsorba Lucfalva Kunhegyes Lulla Kunmadaras Madaras Kompolt Kupa Magosliget Kutas Magy Magyaregregy Lad Magyarhertelend Magyarhomorog Lak Magyarkeszi Magyarlukafa Laskod Magyarmecske Magyartelek
    [Show full text]
  • Magyarország Közigazgatási Helynévkönyve, 2018. Január 1
    ISSN 1217-2952 MAGYARORSZÁG KÖZIGAZGATÁSI HELYNÉVKÖNYVE, 2018. JANUÁR 1. 9 771217 295008 2018 Gazetteer of Hungary, 1 January 2018 ÁR: 2700 FT R 1. Á SI HELYNÉVKÖNYVE, 2018. JANU Á January 2018 st TATISZTIKAI ÉVKÖNYV TATISZTIKAI S G KÖZIGAZGAT Á MAGYAR MAGYAR MAGYARORSZ 1 Gazetteer of Hungary, Magyarország közigazgatási helynévkönyve 2018. január 1. Gazetteer of Hungary 1 January 2018 Központi Statisztikai Hivatal Hungarian Central Statistical Office Budapest, 2018 © Központi Statisztikai Hivatal, 2018 © Hungarian Central Statistical Office, 2018 ISSN 1217-2952 Felelős kiadó – Responsible publisher: Dr. Vukovich Gabriella elnök – president Felelős szerkesztő – Responsible editor: Bóday Pál főosztályvezető – head of department Borítófotó – Cover photo: Fotolia Nyomdai kivitelezés – Printed by: Xerox Magyarország Kft. – Táskaszám: 2018.069 TARTALOM ÚTMUTATÓ A KÖTET HASZNÁLATÁHOZ ....................................................................................................... 5 KÓDJEGYZÉK ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 I. ÖSSZEFOGLALÓ ADATOK 1. A helységek száma a helység jogállása szerint ................................................................................................................................ 17 2. A főváros és a megyék területe, lakónépessége és a lakások száma ............................................................................................. 18 3. A települési önkormányzatok
    [Show full text]