Competition of a Nectar-Robbing Bumble Bee with a Legitimate Forager and Its Consequences for Female Reproductive Success of Fuchsia Magellanica
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2018-09-14 Competition of a nectar-robbing bumble bee with a legitimate forager and its consequences for female reproductive success of Fuchsia magellanica Rosenberger, Nick Martin Rosenberger, N. M. (2018). Competition of a nectar-robbing bumble bee with a legitimate forager and its consequences for female reproductive success of Fuchsia magellanica (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/33042 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108689 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Competition of a nectar-robbing bumble bee with a legitimate forager and its consequences for female reproductive success of Fuchsia magellanica by Nick Martin Rosenberger A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2018 © Nick Martin Rosenberger 2018 Abstract In pollination systems, competition can cause floral visitors to adopt behaviors at high densities that may antagonize floral reproduction. I evaluated the density-dependence of nectar robbing by a short-tongued bumble bee, Bombus terrestris, and its consequences for both competition with an effective pollinator, Bombus dahlbomii, and female reproduction by the shrub Fuchsia magellanica. Daily sampling documented an abrupt, density-dependent transition from no robbing to almost exclusive robbing by B. terrestris. Robbing facilitated flower visitation by B. terrestris while aggravating its competition with B. dahlbomii. Nectar depletion and flower damage caused by robbing reduced pollen receipt by F. magellanica flowers, depressed pollen- tube success and reduced fruit quantity and quality. This research demonstrates that by modifying floral conditions to suit their foraging needs nectar robbers can gain a competitive advantage over effective pollinators, possibly promoting their long-term decline, while also compromising reproduction by the affected plant species. Keywords: competition, mutualism, pollination, nectar robbing, antagonism, density- dependence, invasive species. ii Preface This thesis is original, unpublished, independent work by the author, N. Rosenberger. iii Acknowledgements This thesis was made possible by so many people from different aspects of both my personal and professional life, and to all involved I am eternally grateful. I would like to thank my co-advisers Lawrence Harder and Marcelo Aizen. To Lawrence I am grateful for his endless patience and thoughtful guidance throughout this long scientific process. He has made me both a more critical scientist but opened a broader world by helping me become a process-oriented ecologist. To Marcelo I am eternally grateful for his willingness and enthusiasm to help me pursue a dream project and for his kindness, support and excellent mentorship over our years of working together. I would also like to thank my committee members Ralph Cartar and John Post for their conversations and helpful feedback in the analytical and conceptual direction of the project. I thank my funding sources, National Geographic and the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada for supporting my field work and lab work respectively. I would like to thank my fellow members of the Harder Lab, Lauren Sawich, Ilona Clocher and Colby Regal for their companionship and friendship through the graduate school process. I also thank my Argentine colleagues Agustín Sáez, Carolina Morales, Marina Strelin and Marina Arbetman for their kind support and friendship during my time in Argentina. In particular, Agustin and Carolina helped tremendously during the early phases of the project helping with study design and deal with logistics in the field and laboratory. I also thank Mora Ibánez Molina for her invaluable aid in the laboratory and sorting out methods for sample processing. I thank Rachel Dickson for her wonderful help and friendship in the field, and for enthusiastically embracing the hard work of such a rigorous long study. I also thank Sara Saez iv for her help in the field at the beginning of the project. I thank the ranger in Puerto Blest, Sol Hourmilougue for her logistical support and generosity to ensure the success of this project. Furthermore, I thank Carlos Mayud for his friendship and for the many dinners he cooked in the Estación Biológica, and for making sure I had not died in the field when I was out late into the evening during a thunder storm. I thank my fellow students, Jessica Hopson, Kyle Wilson, Will Murphy, Emily Cribb, Analisa Lazaro-Cote, Dan Wuitchik, Sara Smith and Danielle Clake for their friendship and continuous support. I especially would like to thank Louise Hahn for looking out for me during my time in graduate school and for her friendship. I would also like to thank my undergraduate mentors Daniel Pletscher and Frank Rosenzweig for their continued support of my research and scientific career beyond my undergraduate career. I thank my parents Dana and Dave Joslyn, and Ed Rosenberger and Kate Catillaz for their love, always standing by my decision to pursue research and wholeheartedly supporting me in pursing my dreams. Finally, I thank my grandparents Lon and Zoe Richardson for their love, support and shining role in my life. v Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. ii Preface ............................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. vi List of Tables .................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures and Illustrations ..................................................................................... ix Chapter 1. Interactions in Pollination Systems ...............................................................1 1.1 Multiple outcomes of direct and indirect species interactions .............................1 1.2 Pollinator-pollinator interactions ...........................................................................2 1.3 Consequences for plant-pollinator mutualisms ....................................................3 1.4 Objectives .................................................................................................................5 Chapter 2 – Density-dependent nectar robbing and consequences for competition between two bumble bee species ..............................................................................6 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................6 2.2 Methods .....................................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Study species and site. .....................................................................................9 2.2.2 Plant surveys. .................................................................................................10 2.2.3 Data analysis. .................................................................................................12 2.3 Results .....................................................................................................................15 2.3.1 Dynamics of flowering, bee visitation and the incidence of robbed flowers. ..........................................................................................................................15 2.3.2 Bee abundance. ..............................................................................................17 2.3.3 Incidence of robbed flowers. .........................................................................18 2.3.4 Flower visits. ..................................................................................................19 2.3.5 Flower visit behavior. ....................................................................................20 2.4 Discussion ...............................................................................................................21 2.4.1 Density-dependent interactions. ...................................................................23 2.4.2 Nectar robbing. ..............................................................................................24 2.4.3 Implications for nectar robbing invasion. ...................................................25 Chapter 3 – Quantitative and qualitative effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success of Fuchsia magellanica .......................................................44 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................44