DOCSLIB.ORG

Thpo Historic Preservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thpo Historic Preservation Tribal Historic Preservation Office Historic Preservation Fund Grant QUICK GUIDE National Park Service 2016 1 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - HPF FUNDING BASICS ................................................................................................................. 5 Source of Historic Preservation Fund ..................................................................................................................... 5 Eligibility requirements .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Apportionment Formula for Awarding HPF funds to THPOs .................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER 2 - NPS THPO GRANT CONTACTS ................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 3 - PRE-APPLICATION PROCESS ................................................................................................... 7 ASAP.GOV Enrollment Request Form ....................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 4 - APPLICATION PROCESS ............................................................................................................. 9 Identify Your Tribe’s Grant Award Amount ............................................................................................................ 9 Complete an Application ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Application Review .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Application Approval ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Instructions for Downloading Applications from Grants.gov ................................................................................. 11 Confirmation screen from Grants.gov .................................................................................................................... 16 Instructions for the Anticipated Activities List (a.k.a. Workplan) ........................................................................... 17 Sample Anticipated Activities List for FY 2013 ........................................................................................................ 18 THPO HPF Instructions for the Application SF424-A (on Grants.gov) ..................................................................... 21 Sample Completed Application SF424a .................................................................................................................. 23 THPO Budget Narrative/Justification ...................................................................................................................... 25 Indirect Costs Explained .......................................................................................................................................... 30 OMB Circular A-133 Audit Certification Form ......................................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 5 – GENERAL GRANT REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................... 33 Agreement with Terms and Conditions of Award ................................................................................................ 33 Grant Duration and Expiration of Funds .............................................................................................................. 33 Regulations Governing HPF Grants ...................................................................................................................... 33 Waivers of Grant Requirements........................................................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER 6 – ACTIVITIES REQUIRING PRIOR APPROVAL .................................................................... 36 Grant Modifications ............................................................................................................................................. 36 Equipment Purchases .......................................................................................................................................... 36 2 Preagreement Costs and Program Income ........................................................................................................... 36 CHAPTER 7 – REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. 37 Annual Grant Reporting Requirements ................................................................................................................ 37 Grant Close-Out Reporting Requirements ............................................................................................................ 38 NPS/THPO Partnership Agreement - Reporting Requirements ............................................................................ 38 Guidelines – Annual Significant Preservation Accomplishments Report ................................................................ 39 Annual Significant Preservation Accomplishments Report Format ........................................................................ 40 Annual Report Sample ............................................................................................................................................ 41 Guidelines - Annual Grant Products Summary Report (GPS) .................................................................................. 47 Grant Products Summary Form .............................................................................................................................. 51 SF 424-A Final Budget Report Instructions ............................................................................................................. 52 CHAPTER 8 - FEES CHARGED FOR CONSULTATION ................................................................................ 54 CHAPTER 9 – NEPA REVIEW REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 56 CHAPTER 10 – RISKS OF AND REMEDIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE .................................................... 62 CHAPTER 11 - RETURNING FUNDS TO ASAP ......................................................................................................... 63 Automated Clearing House (ACH) Debit Returns.................................................................................................... 63 Fedwire Return of Payment to ASAP ...................................................................................................................... 63 CHAPTER 12 – NOTIFYING NPS OF A CHANGE IN THPO ........................................................................................ 66 APPENDIX A - HPF Manual Chapter 6:Grant-Assisted Program Activities .............................................................. 67 A. Purpose. ..................................................................................................................................................... 67 B. Applicability................................................................................................................................................ 67 C. General Requirements for Grant-Assisted Activity. .................................................................................... 67 D. Eligible Grant-Assisted Activities. ............................................................................................................... 70 E. Ineligible Grant-Assisted Activities. ............................................................................................................ 72 F. Administration Program Area. .................................................................................................................... 74 G. Historic Preservation Planning Program Area. ............................................................................................ 74 H. Survey and Inventory Program Area. .......................................................................................................... 80 I. National Register Program Area. ................................................................................................................ 84 J. Development/Acquisition/Covenants Program Area. ................................................................................. 86 K. Development. ............................................................................................................................................. 88 3 L. Acquisition.................................................................................................................................................. 92 M. Covenants and Preservation Agreements. ................................................................................................. 95 N. Preservation Tax Incentives Program Area. ............................................................................................. 100 O. Review and Compliance Program Area. ................................................................................................... 102 P. Local Government Certification Program Area. .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy: Phase 1 Topical Report West Flank of Coso, CA
    SANDIA REPORT SAND2016-8930 Printed September 2016 ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED FOR DOE REVIEW, April 2016 Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy: Phase 1 Topical Report West Flank of Coso, CA Douglas Blankenship, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 Kelly Blake1, Wendy Calvin2, Steve DeOreo3, James E. Faulds4, Jonathan Glen5, Stephen Hickman5, Nick Hinz4, Ole Kaven5, Mike Lazaro1, Jesse McCulloch3, David Meade1, Mack Kennedy6, Geoff Phelps5, Andrew Sabin1, Martin Schoenball5, Drew Silar6, Ann Robertson-Tait7, Colin Williams5 1U.S. Navy Geothermal Program Office, China Lake, 93555 2Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno 89557 3Coso Operating Company LLC, Coso Junction, 93542 4Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557 5U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 6Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 7GeothermEx/Schlumberger Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Cultural Property Eligibility Statements for Gold Strike Canyon, Nevada and Sugarloaf Mountain, Arizona
    The Land Still Speaks: Traditional Cultural Property Eligibility Statements for Gold Strike Canyon, Nevada and Sugarloaf Mountain, Arizona Item Type Report Authors Stoffle, Richard W.; Carroll, Alex; Toupal, Rebecca; Zedeno, Maria Nieves; Eisenberg, Amy; Amato, John Publisher Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona Download date 15/02/2019 22:14:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/270991 Traditional Cultural Property Eligibility Statements For Gold Strike Canyon, Nevada and Sugarloaf Mountain, Arizona Camp 8, Black Canyon of the Colorado River, 1871. Photograph by Timothy O’Sullivan Source: Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. This Statement of Eligibility (DOE) is submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office by the Federal Highway Administration in partial fulfillment of Section 106 Requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 for the Hoover Dam Bypass Project. June 21, 2000 Traditional Cultural Property Eligibility Statements For Gold Strike Canyon, Nevada and Sugarloaf Mountain, Arizona Prepared for CH2M Hill, Inc. 2020 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 160 Las Vegas, Nevada And Federal Highway Administration Central Federal Lands Highway Division Denver, Colroado By University of Arizona (Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology): Richard Stoffle, Ph.D. Alex Carroll, M.A. Rebecca Toupal, M.L.A. M. Nieves Zedeno, Ph.D. Amy Eisenberg, M.S. Rebecca Toupal, M.L.A. John Amato, LPN American Indian Core Consultation Work Group: Richard Arnold, Core Group Spokesperson (Southern Paiute) Octavius Seowtewa (Zuni Pueblo) Paul Chaco (Navajo Nation) Elda Bulter (Mojave Tribe) Betty Cornelius (Colorado River Indian Reservation) David Harper (Mohave – Colorado River Indian Tribe ii Table of Contents Page Section I: Background and Introduction......................................
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Contributions of the Archaeological Research Facility
    UC Berkeley Contributions of the Archaeological Research Facility Title A Bibliography of California Archaeology Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8xz7r26t Publication Date 1970-05-01 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California *~~ . is Number 6 May, 1970 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGY Compiled by Robert F. Heizer and Albert B. Elsasser with the assistance of C. William Clewlow, Jr. ~~~~~~~~AA3 K A: X Ab a **'M ss :.iS2^~S.6 aAo Ai 0' A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGY Compiled by Robert F. Heizer and Albert B. Elsasser with the assistance of C. William Clewlow, Jr. Available Open Access at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8xz7r26t PREFACE One of the present compilers in 1949 presented a bibliography on the same subject and same title as REPORT No. 4 of the California Archaeological Survey. The 1949 bibliography ran to 27 pages - about one third of the length of the present list. We offer the present work not as a complete reference list to publications on the subject, but rather as an interim and admittedly incomplete bibliography which may be of assistance in locating information on regional archaeology. We have generally avoided listing papers which have appeared in short-lived, usually mimeo- graphed, newsletters. There are dozens of these fugitive series, and in some cases they report useful data, but since they are not regularly available there seems little purpose in citing them. A useful project would be for some person to compile a reference collection of them in some library or research facility where they could be consulted.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY of Lnyo WATER DEPARTMENT April I, 2011 TO
    (760) 878-0001 FAX: (760) 878-2552 EMAIL: [email protected] WEB: http://www.inyownlcr.org P.O. Box 337 135 South Jackson Street Independence, CA 93526 COUNTY OF lNYO WATER DEPARTMENT April I, 2011 TO: Board of Supervisors Planning Commission Water Commission FROM: Bob Harrington, Water Department Director SUBJECT: Addendum to the Hydrologic Monitoring and Mitigation Plan for Conditional Use Permit #2007-003/Coso Operating Company, LLC. Attached is an Addendum to the Hydrologic Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (HMMP) for Conditional Use Permit #2007-003/Coso Operating Company, LLC. Coso Operating Company's project, which was permitted in May 2009, allows Coso Operating Company to pump groundwater from their property in Rose Valley and transfer the water to their geothermal power generating facility, where they inject the water into the geothermal reservoir. Groundwater pumping for the project began in December, 2009. The HMMP and Conditional Use Permit require that after one year of groundwater pumping, the groundwater model developed during the permitting process for the project is to be recalibrated and used to revise the groundwater level triggers, pumping rate, and duration of pumping. The Addendum documents this work, and presents revised groundwater level triggers, pumping rate, and duration of pumping that have been approved by the Water Department. The recalibrated model incorporates information and observations from the first year ofthe project into the groundwater model, thereby making the model more reliable and representative of the Rose Valley groundwater system's response to pumping. [n revising the pumping rate, duration, and triggers, the same standards for assessing significant impacts were used as were used during the permitting process.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F1 – Cultural Resources Inventory and Monitoring Report for the North Haiwee Dam No
    APPENDIX F Cultural Resources Appendix F1 – Cultural Resources Inventory and Monitoring Report for the North Haiwee Dam No. 2 Project, Inyo County, California Appendix F2 – Potential Fossil Yield Classification Report This page intentionally left blank. Appendix F1 Cultural Resources Inventory and Monitoring Report for the North Haiwee Dam No. 2 Project, Inyo County, California This page intentionally left blank. REDACTED CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY REPORT FOR THE NORTH HAIWEE DAM NO. 2 PROJECT, INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA: VOLUME I: TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared by: Elena Nilsson and Russell Bevill URS Corporation 1550 Humboldt Road, Ste. 2 Chico, CA 95928 Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Ridgecrest Field Office 300 South Richmond Boulevard Ridgecrest, CA and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 111 N. Hope Street Los Angeles, CA January 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A seismic stability evaluation report on North Haiwee Dam No. 1 (existing Dam or NHD), prepared by Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) in 2001, concluded that the existing earthfill dam, completed in 1913, could experience structural failure during a controlling maximum credible earthquake (MCE) scenario. NHD is an essential component of the Los Angeles Aqueduct (LAA) system, which transports water from the Owens Valley through North Haiwee Reservoir (NHR) and South Haiwee Reservoir (SHR) to the City of Los Angeles (City). Based on the evaluation report, the California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) directed LADWP to operate NHR at a restricted maximum surface water elevation of 3,757.5 feet (ft.), to prevent an uncontrolled release of water and flooding in the event of dam failure resulting from an MCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bibliography
    March 4, 2016 Coso Rock Art Bibliography Compiled by Alan P. Garfinkel, PhD, RPA, and Alexander K. Rogers, MA, MS, RPA Introduction The list of publications on Coso rock art continues to grow. The list below only includes those publications that are accessible to the public; “gray literature”, such as cultural resource management reports which are not generally accessible are excluded. Bibliography Arnold, Caroline 1996 Stories in Stone: Rock Art Pictures by Early Americans. Clarion Books, New York. [Short but richly illustrated children’s book on Coso rock art.] Baldwin, Clifford Park 1931 Archaeological Exploration and Survey in Southern Inyo County, California. Survey conducted for the Southwest Museum. Copy on file, Maturango Museum, Ridgecrest, California, and Eastern California Museum, Independence, California. Bock, Frank. 1969 A Visit to Big and Little Petroglyph Canyons: One of America’s Newest National Landmarks. San Bernardino County Museum Quarterly, XVI (3):1-7. 1983 The Great Galleries of the Coso Range: California’s Most Extensive Rock Art Site. In Ancient Images on Stone edited by Jo Anne Van Tilberg, pp.66-74. Rock Art Archive, The Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Briot, Alain 1999 Little Petroglyph Canyon: A Portfolio of Photographs by Alain Briot. American Indian Rock Art 25:203-212. Brooks, Cecil R., William M. Clements, Jo Ann Kantner, and Genevieve Y. Poirier 1979 A Land Use History of Coso Hot Springs, Inyo County, California. Prepared for the Naval Weapons Center by Iroquois Research Institute. Reprinted 2008 as Maturango Museum publication No. 23. Maturango Press: Ridgecrest. Catacora, Andrea 2010 Examining Petroglyphs in the Bircham Uplands through the use of Digitally Enhanced Imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Coso Range, California
    Rethinking the Chronology of Ray Cave (CA-INY-444) in the Coso Range, California Alexander K. Rogers Abstract: The chronological data reported by Panlaqui The Ray Cave, excavated in 1967, is located in the Coso contained inconsistencies, which she pointed out in Mountains of southern Inyo County, California. The assemblage her analysis. In particular, obsidian hydration data provided artifactual evidence for seasonal use over a span of approximately 4,000 years, up to and including the historic did not match with radiocarbon or point typologies period. The site has been described as primarily a Newberry (Gilreath 2000; Hillebrand 1972; Panlaqui 1974). period (3,150–1,350 BP) site, with intermittent use in later times; however, chronological data contained significant Furthermore, since the original work predated inconsistencies and not all data sources were used in the original Bennyhoff and Hughes (1987), bead typologies analysis. The assemblage from the site has now been reanalyzed were not analyzed. This paper reanalyzes the and an integrated chronology constructed based on radiocarbon, obsidian hydration, stratigraphy, and point and bead typologies. chronological data and constructs a consistent The results are now more consistent, and suggest earliest use chronology, based on recent methodological prior to 6,000 BP, major use in the Little Lake and Newberry periods, and lesser but still significant use in the Haiwee, advances not available to Panlaqui in 1974. Marana, and Historic periods. Environmental Context Introduction The Ray Cave is situated on the south edge of The Ray Cave site (CA-INY-444) is a small rock Wild Horse Mesa in the Coso Mountains of eastern shelter located in the Coso Mountains of southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Archaeology: Prehistoric Population Movements and Cultural Identity in the Southwest Great Basin and Far Southern Sierra Nevada
    Linguistic Archaeology: Prehistoric Population Movements and Cultural Identity in the Southwest Great Basin and Far Southern Sierra Nevada By ALAN PHILIP GOLD B.A. (California State University, Northridge) 1974 M.A. (University of California, Davis) 1977 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Prehistoric Forager Ecology in the OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS Approved: ____________________________________ Conrad J. Bahre, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Michael G. Barbour, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Michael J. Moratto, Ph.D. Committee in Charge 2005 i Copyright © by Alan Philip Gold 2005 ii For my wife, Leanne, and my children, Jason, Max, and Hannah and my friends Richard Blalock, Dr. Donna Kono, and Julia Schley. Thank you for keeping the dream alive and for your support throughout the completion of that vision. iii Linguistic Archaeology: Population Movement and Cultural Identity in the Southwest Great Basin and Far Southern Sierra Nevada Abstract Scholars posit contrasting models of the ethnic identity and language / population movements of prehistoric peoples in the southwestern Great Basin and far southern Sierra Nevada. These models favor either in situ cultural development or population replacement and expansion. Archaeological data from these areas are used in this dissertation to examine past movements of peoples speaking Numic and Tubatulabalic languages and, thereby, to evaluate the models. Seven
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Resource Management Plan for the Fossil Falls/Little Lake Locality
    BLM LIBRARY BUREAl 88000467 LMLirUhNIA A Cultural Resource Management Plan for the Fossil Falls/ Little Lake Locality by Alan P. Garfinkel cultural resources publications archaeology The cover figure depicts a petroglyph in the shape of a bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis ) . This rock art style is typical of the Coso Range, fifteen miles north of Fossil Falls. It- .CJ4 A Cultural Resource Management Plan for the Fossil Falls/Little Lake Locality by: Alan P. Garfinkel August, 1976 Bakers field District Office Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, California Reprinted 1980 Bureau of Land Management Library Bldg. 50, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 , \ FOREWARD The research conducted at the Fossil Falls/Little Lake locality by Alan P. Garfinkel in 1976 represents an intensive three month investigation of a unique geological area containing some of the few subsurface occupational remains of the "Pinto" or "Little Lake" period, dating from at least 3000 B.C. Additional cultural material found in stratigraphic context in this area may date to as early as 8000 B.C., suggesting affiliation with the "Lake Mojave" complex. Projectile point forms recovered from both surface and subsurface contexts represent the entire Great Basin temporal series, dating from 8000 B.C. to at least A.D. 1200. The location of these archaeological sites near one of the few freshwater lakes in the Mojave Desert, their proximity to a known source of high quality obsidian, and their association with Pleistocene river channels contribute to their unique characteristics which distinguish them from other archaeological sites in the Mojave Desert. The unique qualities of the Fossil Falls/Little Lake locality resulted in its listing on the National Register of Historic Places in July of 1980 as the "Fossil Falls Archaeological District." In addition, most of the management recommendations in this report were successfully implemented in 1978 and 1979, providing protection to critical resources while also enabling the public to enjoy them.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Extent of the Traditional Timbisha Shoshone Homeland
    Evaluating the Extent of the Traditional Timbisha Shoshone Homeland Ashley K. Parker∗& Brian F. Codding Department of Anthropology, University of Utah Report Prepared for the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe July 25, 2016 ∗corresponding author; email: [email protected] 1 [this page intentionally left blank] 2 July 25, 2016 Executive Summary The focus of this report is to define the boundary of the traditional Timbisha Shoshone homeland, specifically examining the southern boundary, based on the limited ethnographic data recorded from approximately 1849 to the present, government records, historical docu- ments, family histories and contemporary land use. Results identify important locations on the landscape, including settlements, resources, and movements from the late Pre-European period to the present. This work was conducted by researchers in the Department of Anthro- pology at the University of Utah at the request the Tribal Council of the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe. For the purposes of this report we have identified three distinct periods of Timbisha history|Pre-contact, Historic, Modern|and organized the report accordingly, focusing on Timbisha population movements just prior to contact, during the time settlers came into the area and forced the Timbisha out of their traditional territories, and ongoing displacement today. Rather than detailing complete local histories and legal battles, we associate a times and places with population settlements and land-use areas. Prior to the European incursion, traditional core territories of Timbisha Shoshone bands include Saline Valley, the northern end of Indian Wells Valley, Panamint Valley, Death Val- ley, and the Coso Range. While the southern most population centers are large single-family village clusters around Little Lake and Coso Springs, their southern territory likely extended to the Coso and Argus Ranges, northern Indian Wells Valley, Trona, and the southern end of Death Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Sacred Sites and the Department of Defense
    Native American Sacred Sites and the Department of Defense Item Type Report Authors Deloria Jr., Vine; Stoffle, Richard W. Publisher Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona Download date 04/10/2021 07:21:53 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/272997 NATIVE AMERICAN SACRED SITES AND THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Edited by Vine Deloria, Jr. The University of Colorado and Richard W. Stoffle The University of Arizona® Submitted to United States Department of Defense Washington, D. C. June 1998 DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U. S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Department of the Interior, or any other Federal or state agency, or any Tribal government. Cover Photo: Fajada Butte, Chaco Culture National Historic Park, New Mexico NATIVE AMERICAN SACRED SITES AND THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Edited by Vine Deloria, Jr. The University of Colorado and Richard W. Stoffle The University of Arizona® Report Sponsored by The Legacy Resource Management Program United States Department of Defense Washington, D. C. with the assistance of Archeology and Ethnography Program United States National Park Service Washington, D. C. June 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables vii List of Figures ix List of Appendices x Acknowledgments xii Foreward xiv CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Scope of This Report 1 Overview of Native American Issues 3 History and Background of the Legacy Resources Management Program 4 Legal Basis for Interactions Regarding
    [Show full text]
  • Age of the Coso Formation, Inyo County, California
    Age of the Coso Formation, Inyo County, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1527 Age of the Coso Forn1ation, Inyo County, California By CHARLES R. BACON, DENNIS M. GIOV ANNETT!, WENDELL A. DUFFIELD, G. BRENT DALRYMPLE, and ROBERT E. DRAKE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1527 A re-evaluation of the age of the Coso Formation) based on potassium-argon ages of the volcanic rocks that are intercalated with) intrude) and overlie ihe Coso Formation UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bacon, CharlesR., Age of the Coso Formation, In yo County, California (Geological Survey Bulletin 1527) Bibliography: p. 18 Supt. ofDocs. No.: I 19.3:1527 I. Geology, Stratigraphic-Tertiary. 2. Geology-Califomia-Inyo County. I. Bacon, Charles R. II. Series. QE75.B9 No. 1527 [QE90.15] 557.3s 81-607973 [551.7'88'0979487) AACR2 For sale by the Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Abstract --- ---- -- -- -- --- -- - -- -- - --- -- - -- -- - -- -- --- -- - ---- -- --- --- --- --- -- - - 1 Introduction - -- -- ------ - -- - -- --- -- -- --- --- -- --- -- - -- --- -- -- --- --- -- --- --- - - 1 Acknowledgments ------- ----------- -------------- ---- ------ ----- ----------- 3 Dating techniques ----- -- -- - -- - -- -- - -- -- -- --- -- - --- ---- - -- --- -- ---- -- --- -- -- 3 Stratigraphic relations between potassium-argon-dated
    [Show full text]