Myanmar's Moment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Myanmar's Moment McKinsey Global Institute McKinsey Global Institute Myanmar’s moment: Unique opportunities, major challenges major opportunities, Unique moment: Myanmar’s June 2013 Myanmar’s moment: Unique opportunities, major challenges The McKinsey Global Institute The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), the business and economics research arm of McKinsey & Company, was established in 1990 to develop a deeper understanding of the evolving global economy. Our goal is to provide leaders in the commercial, public, and social sectors with the facts and insights on which to base management and policy decisions. MGI research combines the disciplines of economics and management, employing the analytical tools of economics with the insights of business leaders. Our “micro-to-macro” methodology examines microeconomic industry trends to better understand the broad macroeconomic forces affecting business strategy and public policy. MGI’s in-depth reports have covered more than 20 countries and 30 industries. Current research focuses on four themes: productivity and growth; the evolution of global financial markets; the economic impact of technology and innovation; and urbanisation. Recent research covers job creation, infrastructure productivity, cities of the future, and the impact of the Internet. MGI is led by McKinsey & Company directors Richard Dobbs and James Manyika. Michael Chui, Susan Lund, Jaana Remes, and Yougang Chen serve as MGI principals. Project teams are led by a group of senior fellows and include consultants from McKinsey’s offices around the world. These teams draw on McKinsey’s global network of partners and industry and management experts. In addition, leading economists, including Nobel laureates, act as research advisers. The partners of McKinsey & Company fund MGI’s research; it is not commissioned by any business, government, or other institution. For further information about MGI and to download reports, please visit www.mckinsey.com/mgi. McKinsey & Company in ASEAN McKinsey & Company is a global management consulting firm that helps many of the world’s leading organisations address their challenges. With consultants deployed in more than 50 countries across the globe, McKinsey advises 95 of the 100 largest corporations, government agencies in more than 85 countries, and leading institutions in the social sector on strategic, operational, organisational, and technological issues. For more than eight decades, the firm’s primary objective has been to serve as an organisation’s most trusted external adviser on critical issues facing senior management. Situated in a region of unique economic, cultural, and religious diversity, McKinsey & Company in Southeast Asia is one of the Firm’s fastest-growing office complexes. Since McKinsey established Jakarta as its first office in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region in 1995, it has opened offices in Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, Thailand, and, most recently, in Vietnam in 2008. With a team of more than 300 global and local professionals, McKinsey has served clients across the public, private, and social sectors in the region to address their most important challenges as Southeast Asia grows as an important, integrated regional market. McKinsey & Company in Southeast Asia is led by McKinsey director Oliver Tonby. Copyright © McKinsey & Company 2013 McKinsey Global Institute June 2013 Myanmar’s moment: Unique opportunities, major challenges Heang Chhor Richard Dobbs Doan Nguyen Hansen Fraser Thompson Nancy Shah Lukas Streiff Preface Between June 5 and 7, the World Economic Forum on East Asia meets in Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar’s new capital city. The fact that Myanmar is hosting such a high-profile international gathering of luminaries from industry, government, and academia is a firm signal of the world’s interest in this country’s economic prospects. Myanmar’s economy is relatively small—only 0.2 percent of the Asian economy overall. Yet the potential of Myanmar’s economy is currently subject to intense curiosity. Myanmar is a very unusual case: a large country with a rich history that remains an underdeveloped agrarian economy in the heart of the world’s fastest-growing regional economy—perhaps one of the few remaining, largely untapped markets in the world. It is in this context that the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) decided to launch a research project on Myanmar’s economy. Very little is known about it, and data are generally lacking or of questionable accuracy. We nevertheless have tried to build as strong a fact base for our analysis as possible under the circumstances. A MGI team based in Myanmar for four months collected data from a range of government agencies with the help of local researchers, and conducted field research and more than 200 interviews with experts, political leaders, and business people. We used data from international organisations including the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, UN Development Programme (UNDP), and Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). We also used comparison data from many other countries that have undergone transitions similar to that which could be in prospect in Myanmar today. While the unreliability of data is undeniably an issue, our hope is that this assessment will be a starting point for those looking to better understand Myanmar’s economic prospects. In this report, we discuss Myanmar’s new beginning after a long period of economic stagnation and look at how the economy might develop. We have used MGI’s experience of bottom-up sector analysis to size the potential economic opportunity of Myanmar’s key sectors in the period to 2030—both in terms of their contribution to GDP and the creation of jobs. We highlight the importance of raising labour productivity across the economy. We have also looked at four areas that arguably deserve a greater focus: (1) the fact that Myanmar’s transformation is beginning in the digital age, giving the country the opportunity to leapfrog in its development; (2) the importance of a structural shift towards manufacturing; (3) the impending urbanisation of Myanmar and the imperative to prepare for it; and (4) how to quickly reconnect to the global economy through investment, trade, and people. The task Myanmar faces is monumental—virtually every aspect of economic and social development is on the agenda—and we close the report with a discussion of some of the implications for government as well as businesses from Myanmar and overseas. McKinsey Global Institute Myanmar’s moment: Unique opportunities, major challenges Heang Chhor, a McKinsey director in Singapore, and Richard Dobbs, a McKinsey and MGI director in Seoul, led this research together with Doan Nguyen Hansen, a partner in Vietnam, and Fraser Thompson, an MGI senior fellow in London. Consultant Nancy Shah led the Myanmar-based project team, which consisted of Kuntala Karkun, Stephanie Knight, Meik Laufer, Lukas Streiff, and Christabel Su- Huey Sunmugam, with help from Tim McEvoy, an MGI research fellow. We are grateful for the advice and input of many McKinsey colleagues, including Jonathan Ablett, Suvradipta Banerjee, Timothy Beacom, Shannon Bouton, Marco Breu, Martin Checinski, Li-Kai Chen, Nicola Chiara, Mutsa Chironga, Brian Cooperman, Eoin Daly, Dumitru Dediu, Driek Desmet, Georges Desveaux, Lucia Fiorito, Michael Fleming, Francois Godin, Andrew Grant, Anna Gressel- Bacharan, Shishir Gupta, Supriya Handa, Johan Hesselsøe, Jimmy Hexter, Eduardo Doryan Jara, Martin Joerss, Karen Jones, Priyanka Kamra, Anushia Kandasamy, Duncan Kauffman, Tomas Koch, Kinshuk Kocher, Elif Kutsal, Peter Lambert, Cecile Lavrard, Jean-Christophe Lebraud, Armin Lohr, Susan Lund, Anu Madgavkar, Laurie Mahon, Alan Martin, Tobias Meyer, Jan Mischke, Ellen Mo, Sabrina Mustopo, Derek Neilson, Bettina Neuhaus, Stagg Newman, Raoul Oberman, Gordon Orr, Vivek Pandit, Moira Pierce, Herbert Pohl, Ali Potia, Tamara Rajah, Sree Ramaswamy, Lou Rassey, Markus Rebman, Stefan Rehbach, Jaana Remes, Alfonso Villanueva Rodriguez, Sunali Rohra, Morten Rossé, Lorraine Salazar, Brian Salsberg, Sunil Sanghvi, Shirish Sankhe, Halldor Sigurdsson, Vivien Singer, Seelan Singham, Pornnipa Srivipapattana, Matt Stone, Jennifer Sternberg, Tilman Tacke, Nadia Terfous, Oliver Tonby, Asli Ucyigit, Danny Van Dooren, Sergio Sandoval Villalba, Jue Wang, Jonathan Woetzel, and Haimeng Zhang. The team benefited from the contributions of Janet Bush, MGI senior editor, and Roger Malone, who provided editorial support; Penny Burtt and Rebeca Robboy, for their help on external relations; Julie Philpot, MGI’s editorial production manager; and Marisa Carder and Joanne Willis, visual graphics specialists. We would like to give particular thanks to the advisers on this project: Martin Baily, Bernard L. Schwartz Chair in Economic Policy Development at the Brookings Institution; Richard Cooper, Maurits C. Boas Professor of International Economics at Harvard University; Richard Horsey, independent Myanmar analyst; Nobel Laureate A. Michael Spence, William R. Berkley Professor in Economics and Business at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, and chairman of the Commission on Growth and Development; and Sean Turnell, professor of economics at Macquarie University, Sydney. Many experts in Myanmar and around the world from the fields of academia, government, and business have also offered invaluable guidance, suggestions, and advice. We are very grateful to Nay Aung, founder and CEO, Oway Company Limited; U Set Aung, deputy minister, Ministry of National
Recommended publications
  • Yangon University of Economics Department of Commerce Master of Banking and Finance Programme
    YANGON UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE MASTER OF BANKING AND FINANCE PROGRAMME INFLUENCING FACTORS ON FARM PERFORMANCE (CASE STUDY IN BOGALE TOWNSHIP, AYEYARWADY DIVISION) KHET KHET MYAT NWAY (MBF 4th BATCH – 30) DECEMBER 2018 INFLUENCING FACTORS ON FARM PERFORMANCE CASE STUDY IN BOGALE TOWNSHIP, AYEYARWADY DIVISION A thesis summited as a partial fulfillment towards the requirements for the Degree of Master of Banking and Finance (MBF) Supervised By : Submitted By: Dr. Daw Tin Tin Htwe Ma Khet Khet Myat Nway Professor MBF (4th Batch) - 30 Department of Commerce Master of Banking and Finance Yangon University of Economics Yangon University of Economics ABSTRACT This study aims to identify the influencing factors on farms’ performance in Bogale Township. This research used both primary and secondary data. The primary data were collected by interviewing with farmers from 5 groups of villages. The sample size includes 150 farmers (6% of the total farmers of each village). Survey was conducted by using structured questionnaires. Descriptive analysis and linear regression methods are used. According to the farmer survey, the household size of the respondent is from 2 to 8 members. Average numbers of farmers are 2 farmers. Duration of farming experience is from 11 to 20 years and their main source of earning is farming. Their living standard is above average level possessing own home, motorcycle and almost they owned farmland and cows. The cultivated acre is 30 acres maximum and 1 acre minimum. Average paddy yield per acre is around about 60 bushels per acre for rainy season and 100 bushels per acre for summer season.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 12C: PROFILE of MA SEIN CLIMATE SMART VILLAGE International Institute of Rural Reconstruction; ;
    ANNEX 12C: PROFILE OF MA SEIN CLIMATE SMART VILLAGE International Institute of Rural Reconstruction; ; © 2018, INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF RURAL RECONSTRUCTION This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly credited. Cette œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), qui permet l’utilisation, la distribution et la reproduction sans restriction, pourvu que le mérite de la création originale soit adéquatement reconnu. IDRC Grant/ Subvention du CRDI: 108748-001-Climate and nutrition smart villages as platforms to address food insecurity in Myanmar 33 IDRC \CRDl ..m..»...u...».._. »...m...~ c.-..ma..:«......w-.«-.n. ...«.a.u CLIMATE SMART VILLAGE PROFILE Ma Sein Village Bogale Township, Ayeyarwaddy Region 2 Climate Smart Village Profile Introduction Myanmar is the second largest country in Southeast Asia bordering Bangladesh, Thailand, China, India, and Laos. It has rich natural resources – arable land, forestry, minerals, natural gas, freshwater and marine resources, and is a leading source of gems and jade. A third of the country’s total perimeter of 1,930 km (1,200 mi) is coastline that faces the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea. The country’s population is estimated to be at 60 million. Agriculture is important to the economy of Myanmar, accounting for 36% of its economic output (UNDP 2011a), a majority of the country’s employment (ADB 2011b), and 25%–30% of exports by value (WB–WDI 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Usg Humanitarian Assistance to Burma
    USG HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO BURMA RANGOON CITY AREA AFFECTED AREAS Affected Townships (as reported by the Government of Burma) American Red Cross aI SOURCE: MIMU ASEAN B Implementing NGO aD BAGO DIVISION IOM B Kyangin OCHA B (WEST) UNHCR I UNICEF DG JF Myanaung WFP E Seikgyikanaunglo WHO D UNICEF a WFP Ingapu DOD E RAKHINE b AYEYARWADY Dala STATE DIVISION UNICEF a Henzada WC AC INFORMA Lemyethna IC TI Hinthada PH O A N Rangoon R U G N O I T E G AYEYARWADY DIVISION ACF a U Zalun S A Taikkyi A D ID F MENTOR CARE a /DCHA/O D SC a Bago Yegyi Kyonpyaw Danubyu Hlegu Pathein Thabaung Maubin Twantay SC RANGOON a CWS/IDE AC CWS/IDE AC Hmawbi See Inset WC AC Htantabin Kyaunggon DIVISION Myaungmya Kyaiklat Nyaungdon Kayan Pathein Einme Rangoon SC/US JCa CWS/IDE AC Mayangone ! Pathein WC AC Î (Yangon) Thongwa Thanlyin Mawlamyinegyun Maubin Kyauktan Kangyidaunt Twantay CWS/IDE AC Myaungmya Wakema CWS/IDE Kyauktan AC PACT CIJ Myaungmya Kawhmu SC a Ngapudaw Kyaiklat Mawlamyinegyun Kungyangon UNDP/PACT C Kungyangon Mawlamyinegyun UNICEF Bogale Pyapon CARE a a Kawhmu Dedaye CWS/IDE AC Set San Pyapon Ngapudaw Labutta CWS/IDE AC UNICEF a CARE a IRC JEDa UNICEF a WC Set San AC SC a Ngapudaw Labutta Bogale KEY SC/US JCa USAID/OFDA USAID/FFP DOD Pyinkhayine Island Bogale A Agriculture and Food Security SC JC a Air Transport ACTED AC b Coordination and Information Management Labutta ACF a Pyapon B Economy and Market Systems CARE C !Thimphu ACTED a CARE Î AC a Emergency Food Assistance ADRA CWS/IDE AC CWS/IDE aIJ AC Emergency Relief Supplies Dhaka IOM a Î! CWS/IDE AC a UNICEF a D Health BURMA MERLIN PACT CJI DJ E Logistics PACT ICJ SC a Dedaye Vientiane F Nutrition Î! UNDP/PACT Rangoon SC C ! a Î ACTED AC G Protection UNDP/PACT C UNICEF a Bangkok CARE a IShelter and Settlements Î! UNICEF a WC AC J Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene WC WV GCJI AC 12/19/08 The boundaries and names used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Tract of Mandalay Region !
    !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. Myanmar Information Management Unit !. !. !. Village Tract of Mandalay Region !. !. !. !. 95° E 96° E Tigyaing !. !. !. / !. !. Inn Net Maing Daing Ta Gaung Taung Takaung Reserved Forest !. Reserved Forest Kyauk Aing Mabein !. !. !. !. Ma Gyi Kone Reserved !. Forest Thabeikkyin !. !. Reserved Forest !. Let Pan Kyunhla Kone !. Se Zin Kone !. Kyar Hnyat !. !. Kanbalu War Yon Kone !. !. !. Pauk Ta Pin Twin Nge Mongmit Kyauk Hpyu !. !. !. Kyauk Hpyar Yae Nyar U !. Kyauk Gyi Kyet Na !. Reserved Hpa Sa Bai Na Go Forest Bar Nat Li Shaw Kyauk Pon 23° N 23° Kyauk War N 23° Kyauk Gyi Li Shaw Ohn Dan Lel U !. Chaung Gyi !. Pein Pyit !. Kin Tha Dut !. Gway Pin Hmaw Kyauk Sin Sho !. Taze !. !. Than Lwin Taung Dun Taung Ah Shey Bawt Lone Gyi Pyaung Pyin !. Mogoke Kyauk Ka Paing Ka Thea Urban !. Hle Bee Shwe Ho Weik Win Ka Bar Nyaung Mogoke Ba Mun !. Pin Thabeikkyin Kyat Pyin !. War Yae Aye !. Hpyu Taung Hpyu Yaung Nyaung Nyaung Urban Htauk Kyauk Pin Ta Lone Pin Thar Tha Ohn Zone Laung Zin Pyay Lwe Ngin Monglon !. Ye-U Khin-U !. !. !. !. !. Reserved Forest Shwe Kyin !. !. Tabayin !. !. !. !. Shauk !. Pin Yoe Reserved !. Kyauk Myaung Nga Forest SAGAING !. Pyin Inn War Nat Taung Shwebo Yon !. Khu Lel Kone Mar Le REGION Singu Let Pan Hla !. Urban !. Koke Ko Singu Shwe Hlay Min !. Kyaung !. Seik Khet Thin Ngwe Taung MANDALAY Se Gyi !. Se Thei Nyaung Wun Taung Let Pan Kyar U Yin REGION Yae Taw Inn Kani Kone Thar !. !. Yar Shwe Pyi Wa Di Shwe Done !. Mya Sein Sin Htone Thay Gyi Shwe SHAN Budalin Hin Gon Taing Kha Tet !. Thar Nyaung Pin Chin Hpo Zee Pin Lel Wetlet Kyun Inn !.
    [Show full text]
  • TRENDS in MANDALAY Photo Credits
    Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN MANDALAY Photo credits Paul van Hoof Mithulina Chatterjee Myanmar Survey Research The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN MANDALAY UNDP MYANMAR Table of Contents Acknowledgements II Acronyms III Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 11 2. Methodology 14 2.1 Objectives 15 2.2 Research tools 15 3. Introduction to Mandalay region and participating townships 18 3.1 Socio-economic context 20 3.2 Demographics 22 3.3 Historical context 23 3.4 Governance institutions 26 3.5 Introduction to the three townships participating in the mapping 33 4. Governance at the frontline: Participation in planning, responsiveness for local service provision and accountability 38 4.1 Recent developments in Mandalay region from a citizen’s perspective 39 4.1.1 Citizens views on improvements in their village tract or ward 39 4.1.2 Citizens views on challenges in their village tract or ward 40 4.1.3 Perceptions on safety and security in Mandalay Region 43 4.2 Development planning and citizen participation 46 4.2.1 Planning, implementation and monitoring of development fund projects 48 4.2.2 Participation of citizens in decision-making regarding the utilisation of the development funds 52 4.3 Access to services 58 4.3.1 Basic healthcare service 62 4.3.2 Primary education 74 4.3.3 Drinking water 83 4.4 Information, transparency and accountability 94 4.4.1 Aspects of institutional and social accountability 95 4.4.2 Transparency and access to information 102 4.4.3 Civil society’s role in enhancing transparency and accountability 106 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 Satellite Map of Proposed Project Site
    APPENDIX 6 SATELLITE MAP OF PROPOSED PROJECT SITE Hakha Township, Rim pi Village Tract, Chin State Zo Zang Village A6-1 Falam Township, Webula Village Tract, Chin State Kim Mon Chaung Village A6-2 Webula Village Pa Mun Chaung Village Tedim Township, Dolluang Village Tract, Chin State Zo Zang Village Dolluang Village A6-3 Taunggyi Township, Kyauk Ni Village Tract, Shan State A6-4 Kalaw Township, Myin Ma Hti Village Tract and Baw Nin Village Tract, Shan State A6-5 Ywangan Township, Sat Chan Village Tract, Shan State A6-6 Pinlaung Township, Paw Yar Village Tract, Shan State A6-7 Symbol Water Supply Facility Well Development by the Procurement of Drilling Rig Nansang Township, Mat Mon Mun Village Tract, Shan State A6-8 Nansang Township, Hai Nar Gyi Village Tract, Shan State A6-9 Hopong Township, Nam Hkok Village Tract, Shan State A6-10 Hopong Township, Pawng Lin Village Tract, Shan State A6-11 Myaungmya Township, Moke Soe Kwin Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-12 Myaungmya Township, Shan Yae Kyaw Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-13 Labutta Township, Thin Gan Gyi Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road Protection Dike Rainwater Pond (New) : 5 Facilities Rainwater Pond (Existing) : 20 Facilities A6-14 Labutta Township, Laput Pyay Lae Pyauk Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-15 Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road Irrigation Channel Rainwater Pond (New) : 2 Facilities Rainwater Pond (Existing) Hinthada Township, Tha Si Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-16 Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road
    [Show full text]
  • Mandalay Region Census Report Volume 3 – L
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Mandalay Region Census Report Volume 3 – l Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population May 2015 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Mandalay Region Report Census Report Volume 3 – I For more information contact: Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population Office No. 48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431 062 www.dop.gov.mm May, 2015 Figure 2: Map of Mandalay Region, Districts and Townships ii Census Report Volume 3–I (Mandalay) Foreword The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census (2014 MPHC) was conducted from 29th March to 10th April 2014 on a de facto basis. The successful planning and implementation of the census activities, followed by the timely release of the provisional results in August 2014 and now the main results in May 2015, is a clear testimony of the Government’s resolve to publish all information collected from respondents in accordance with the Population and Housing Census Law No. 19 of 2013. It is now my hope that the main results both Union and each of the State and Region reports will be interpreted correctly and will effectively inform the planning and decision-making processes in our quest for national and sub-national development. The census structures put in place, including the Central Census Commission, Census Committees and officers at the State/Region, District and Township levels and the International Technical Advisory Board (ITAB), a group of 15 experts from different countries and institutions involved in censuses and statistics internationally, provided the requisite administrative and technical inputs for the implementation of the census.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment and Review Framework
    Environmental Assessment and Review Framework Document Status: Final Projet Number: 47152 July 2016 Myanmar: Irrigated Agriculture Inclusive Development Project This environmental assessment and review framework is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 01September 2015) Currency unit – Myanmar Kyats Kyats 1.00 = US $0.0007855 US $1.00 = MMK 1,273 ABBREVIATIONS ACC – agricultural coordination center ADB – Asian Development Bank AP – affected people CDZ – Central Dry Zone CO2 – Carbon dioxide DOA – Department of Agriculture, MOALI EA – Executing Agency EARF – Environmental Assessment and Review Framework ECD – Environmental Conservation Department, MOECAF EHSO – Environment, Health and Safety Officer EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EMP – Environmental Management Plan FESR – Framework for Economic and Social Reforms FGD – focus group discussion GEF – Global Environment Facility GHG – greenhouse gas GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism ha – hectare IEE – Initial Environmental Examination IA – Implementing Agency IAIDP – Irrigated Agriculture Inclusive Development Project IWUMD – Irrigation
    [Show full text]
  • Irrawaddy Delta - MYANMAR Flooded Area Delineation 11/08/2015 11:46 UTC River R
    Nepal (!Loikaw GLIDE number: N/A Activation ID: EMSR130 I Legend r n r India China e Product N.: 16IRRAWADDYDELTA, v2, English Magway a Rakhine w Bangladesh e a w l d a Vietnam Crisis Information Hydrology Consequences within the AOI on 09, 10, 11/08/2015 d Myanmar S Affected Total in AOI y Nay Pyi Taw Irrawaddy Delta - MYANMAR Flooded Area delineation 11/08/2015 11:46 UTC River R ha 428922,1 i v Laos Flooded area e ^ r S Flood - 01/08/2015 Flooded Area delineation 10/08/2015 23:49 UTC Stream Estimated population Inhabitants 4252141 11935674 it Bay of ( to Settlements Built-up area ha 35491,8 75542,0 A 10 Bago n Bengal Thailand y g Delineation Map e Flooded Area delineation 09/08/2015 11:13 UTC Lake y P Transportation Railways km 26,0 567,6 a Cambodia r i w Primary roads km 33,0 402,1 Andam an n a Gulf of General Information d Sea g Reservoir Secondary roads km 57,2 1702,3 Thailand 09 y Area of Interest ) Andam an Cartographic Information River Sea Missing data Transportation Bay of Bengal 08 Bago Tak Full color ISO A1, low resolution (100 dpi) 07 1:600000 Ayeyarwady Yangon (! Administrative boundaries Railway Kayin 0 12,5 25 50 Region km Primary Road Pathein 06 04 11 12 (! Province Mawlamyine Grid: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 46N map coordinate system Secondary Road 13 (! Tick marks: WGS 84 geographical coordinate system ± Settlements 03 02 01 ! Populated Place 14 15 Built-Up Area Gulf of Martaban Andaman Sea 650000 700000 750000 800000 850000 900000 950000 94°10'0"E 94°35'0"E 95°0'0"E 95°25'0"E 95°50'0"E 96°15'0"E 96°40'0"E 97°5'0"E N " 0 ' 5
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Factors for Lymphatic Filariasis and Mass Drug Administration Non
    Dickson et al. Parasites Vectors (2021) 14:72 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04583-y Parasites & Vectors RESEARCH Open Access Risk factors for lymphatic flariasis and mass drug administration non-participation in Mandalay Region, Myanmar Benjamin F. R. Dickson2*, Patricia M. Graves1,3, Ni Ni Aye4, Thet Wai Nwe4, Tint Wai5, San San Win6, Myint Shwe7, Janet Douglass1,3, Peter Wood1, Kinley Wangdi8 and William J. McBride2 Abstract Background: Myanmar commenced a lymphatic flariasis (LF) elimination programme in 2000. Whilst the country has made considerable progress since then, a number of districts have demonstrated persistent transmission after many rounds of mass drug administration (MDA). The causes of unsuccessful MDA have been examined elsewhere; however, there remains little information on the factors that contribute in Myanmar. Methods: We conducted an analysis of factors associated with persistent infection, LF-related hydrocoele and MDA participation in an area with ongoing transmission in 2015. A cross-sectional household survey was undertaken in 24 villages across four townships of Mandalay Region. Participants were screened for circulating flarial antigen (CFA) using immunochromatographic tests and, if positive, for microflaria by night-time thick blood slide. Individu- als 15 year and older were assessed for flariasis morbidity (lymphoedema and, if male, hydrocoele) by ultrasound- assisted clinical examination. A pre-coded questionnaire was used to assess risk factors for LF and for non-participa- tion (never taking MDA). Signifcant variables identifed in univariate analyses were included in separate step-wise multivariate logistic regressions for each outcome. Results: After adjustment for covariates and survey design, being CFA positive was signifcantly associated with age [odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.06), per year], male gender (OR 3.14, 1.27–7.76), elevation (OR 0.96, 0.94–0.99, per metre) and the density of people per household room (OR 1.59, 1.31–1.92).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation of the Environmentally Sustainable Food Security Programme (ESFSP)
    OFFICE OF EVALUATION Project evaluation series Final Evaluation of the Environmentally Sustainable Food Security Programme (ESFSP) July 2017 PROJECT EVALUATION SERIES Final Evaluation of the Environmentally Sustainable Food Security Programme (ESFSP) FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF EVALUATION July 2017 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Office of Evaluation (OED) This report is available in electronic format at: http://www.fao.org/evaluation The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO 2017 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Aspects in Vpds Surveillance and Outbreak Investigation
    Laboratory Aspect of VPD Surveillance and Outbreak Investigation Dr Ommar Swe Tin Consultant Microbiologist In-charge National Measles & Rubella Lab, Arbovirus section, National Influenza Centre NHL Fever with Rash Surveillance Measles and Rubella Achieving elimination of measles and control of rubella/CRS by 2020 – Regional Strategic Plan Key Strategies: 1. Immunization 2. Surveillance 3. Laboratory network 4. Support & Linkages Network of Regional surveillance officers (RSO) and Laboratories NSC Office 16 RSOs Office Subnational Measles & Rubella Lab, Subnational JE lab National Measles/Rubella Lab (NHL, Yangon) • Surveillance began in 2003 • From 2005 onwards, case-based diagnosis was done • Measles virus isolation was done since 2006 • PCR since 2016 Sub-National Measles/Rubella Lab (PHL, Mandalay) • Training 29.8.16 to 2.9.16 • Testing since Nov 2016 • Accredited in Oct 2017 Measles Serology Data Measles Measles IgM Measles IgM Measles IgM Test Done Positive Negative Equivocal 2011 1766 1245 452 69 2012 1420 1182 193 45 2013 328 110 212 6 2014 282 24 254 4 2015 244 6 235 3 2016 531 181 334 16 2017 1589 1023 503 62 Rubella Serology Data Rubella Test Rubella IgM Rubella IgM Rubella IgM Done Positive Negative Equivocal 2011 425 96 308 21 2012 195 20 166 9 2013 211 23 185 3 2014 257 29 224 4 2015 243 34 196 13 2016 535 12 511 12 2017 965 8 948 9 Measles Genotypes circulating in Myanmar 1. Isolation in VERO h SLAM cell line 2. Positive culture shows syncytia formation 3. Isolated MeV or sample by PCR 4. Positive PCR product is sent to RRL for sequencing 5.
    [Show full text]