DOCSLIB.ORG

Tamsin Evernden Phd July 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tamsin Evernden Phd July 2017 Dickens and Character: ‘The Economy of Apprehension’ Tamsin Evernden Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted to the Department of English, for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy !1 Declaration of Authorship I, Tamsin Evernden, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: !2 Abstract In November 1867 a young Henry James encountered Charles Dickens at the height of his fame. James was only briefly in Dickens’s presence but noted ‘a kind of economy of apprehension’: a look in the older writer’s eye that he equated to power withheld; limiting local interaction, but also representative of the way Dickens now meted out his implicitly finite gifts, holding something in reserve. Two years previous, in 1865, James had submitted a damning review of Dickens’s last completed novel, Our Mutual Friend, in which he revisited arguments that had dogged Dickens from the beginning of his career, as to how he ‘created nothing but figure’ and ‘added nothing to our understanding of human character’. Although critical opinion has developed over the ensuing century and a half, the penumbra of superficiality remains, with a focus on Dickens’s overt stylisation: melodrama, grotesquerie; pattern and repetition forming the locus of scholarship reassessing Dickens’s prose techniques. I use James’s phrase to initiate a two-way premise; one speculative: that even in Dickens’s apparently simple characterisation there was supreme elective skill winnowing out generative components, so what is outwardly manifest belies the complexity of the founding structure. The more extensive premise, underpinning the body of my thesis, focuses on a few characters conceived as serious, so commonly held to lack the ‘power’ of Dickens’s comic creations. I posit that his characterisation herein was both founded on a more intellectual kind of mental processing than Dickens has been given credit for (whether purposed or sub-conscious); and that these characters provide route maps to thinking around a wide arena of issues, thereby delivering far more than has been appreciated. My thesis comprises a close study of three novels representing Dickens’s early, middle and late period: Oliver Twist, Dombey and Son, and Our Mutual Friend. !3 Contents Introduction 5 1. Oliver Twist: ‘How do you solve a problem like Oliver?’ 19 2. Dombey and Son: ‘Vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle’ 59 3. Our Mutual Friend: ‘To go about, wander, doubt’ 112 Conclusion 173 Bibliography 179 !4 Introduction If ‘character’ has long been ostracised from literary scholarship – to quote Peter Lamarque: ‘Character has been an unpopular and discredited conception for a generation of literary critics’ – Dickens, and analogously Dickens Studies, were bound to suffer an attenuated bilateral effect.1 The association between Dickens and his characters is unparalleled within the history of modern authorship: the result of a triplicate of distinctive factors: Dickens’s own proclaimed relationship with his creations, for whom he expressed an emotional bond; his public readings in the latter part of his career, which generated almost electric responses from audiences already – as the artist David Wilkie commented three decades earlier – ‘talk[ing] about the characters as if they were next-door neighbours’; and the novels’ dissemination within popular culture through media such as film and theatre, which has situated the characters within the wider public domain.2 The situation is further complicated by the dual perspective posited on Dickens’s characters by a loving public, and a critical tradition that has – and this is a great irony – long been suspicious of his craft in this respect, and the results (characters themselves). From George Henry Lewes in 1872, who remarked, ‘his characters have nothing fluctuating or incalculable about them, even when they embody true observation’, to Barbara Hardy a century later, who writes: ‘his individual characters are pretty plainly illustrations, created by needs and roles, seen as agents and victims, within a critical analysis of contemporary England’, the critical heritage is circumscribed by doubt.3 Hardy’s comment reveals, in fact, the benefit that has been seen to outweigh a defect: that Dickens’s overriding concern (different, of course, to his authorial pleasure) was the critique of society within the paradigm of the novel. Iris Murdoch, who rated Dickens highly and whose regard rather gives the lie to critical nit-picking, did not see the need to compartmentalise: ‘Dickens manages to do everything, to be a great imaginative writer and explicit social critic […] his most effective criticism of 1 See Peter Lamarque, ‘How to Create a Fictional Character’, in The Creation of Art: New Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics, ed. by Berys Gaut and Paisley Livingstone (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 33-52 (p. 34). 2 Dickens gave his first public reading in 1853, and increasingly bravado performances over the ensuing decade. See Graham Storey, ‘Preface’, The Letters of Charles Dickens, ed. by Madeline House, Graham Storey and Angus Easson, 12 vols (Oxford: Clarendon, 1965-2002), X (1862-4), vii-xiii, ix. Dickens’s paternalistic attitude towards his characters is expressed in both private letters and published prefaces; he famously dubbed David Copperfield his ‘favourite child’. See ‘Preface to the Charles Dickens edition’ (1867), reproduced in Charles Dickens, David Copperfield, ed. by Nina Burgis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Appendix B, p. 870; David Wilkie’s comment, recorded at a dinner in 1839, is quoted in Leonée Ormond, ‘Dickens and Painting: Contemporary Art’, Dickensian, 80 (1984), 3-25 (p. 4). On Dickens and popular culture see Juliet John, Dickens and Mass Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010). 3 G. H. Lewes, from a review of Vol. I of Forster’s Life, Fortnightly Review, February 1872, reproduced in Charles Dickens: The Critical Heritage, ed. by Philip Collins, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 572-76 (p. 574); Barbara Hardy, The Moral Art of Charles Dickens (London: The Athlone Press, 1970), p. 4. !5 society are made through live and touching characters […] Dickens is a great writer because of his ability to create character’.4 Murdoch fuses a potentially reductionist judgment into a generative one. Dickens’s characters may be ‘created by needs and roles’, but they are transmitters of a critique that works auxiliary effects: ‘live and touching characters’ involve us in empathetic engagement, imprinting the reader’s consciousness not only as personifications of sociopolitical ideas, but as expansive amalgams of affect. This steers us to another tension point within the critical heritage pertaining to character studies: that between affect and form. A professional scholar might understandably resist being absorbed into a character’s story (something that Victorian critics did not see as an indignity, with Thackeray conveying his praise for Dickens’s technique through an emotional response: ‘There’s no writing against such powers as this – one has no chance!’).5 There is a residing assumption within the academy that to be ‘drawn in’ means treating the text as a glass through which we see a parallel reality, an unforgivable naivety under the aegis of theoretical approaches beholden to form. Here, for example, is Terry Eagleton, in his ‘Preface’ to Steven Connor’s structuralist study of Dickens: Criticism of Dickens can be roughly divided into two major camps. On the one hand there are those readings which fasten upon plot, character and relationship, discovering in the novels all the prodigal richness of ‘life’ itself […] The fictionality of the novels is accordingly repressed: they become instead windows onto the Victorian world, in which plot and character are seen less as complex effects of language than as living entities to be directly correlated with what we supposedly agree to be ‘human life’. The second major form of criticism, in reaction to such reductionism, approaches the novels as structures of symbolic meaning, rescuing them from the shame of mere entertainment or documentation for a certain ideology of Literature.6 Though it belongs to a very specific epoch in the history of critical practice, the passage is suggestive of schisms still extant. It posits the assumption that we are in the business of ratios; that an appreciation of fiction through the locus of personal experience or observation (‘life’) will derogate that text’s status as art; that attention to language and metaphor puts into abeyance our susceptibility to affect. My thesis presents a way of looking at Dickens’s construction of character which attempts to give due regard to both the formal structuring and the affective ‘power’. The unscholarly word passes muster here, due to its prominence in the critical heritage: it pinpoints something that has never been quite resolved, and there is a 4 See ‘Literature and Philosophy: A Conversation with Brian Magee’ (1978), in Iris Murdoch, Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature, ed. by Peter Conradi (London: Penguin, 1999), pp. 3-30 (p. 17). 5 William Makepeace Thackeray, responding to the death of Paul Dombey in a letter of 1847, cited in Alan Shelston, Charles Dickens: Dombey and Son and Little Dorrit, ed. by Alan Shelston (London: Macmillan, 1985), p. 34. 6 Terry Eagleton, ‘Preface’, Steven Connor, Charles Dickens (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985), iv-v (iv).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Research A
    11 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Research A writer or an author is going to express their idea through their writing or text, such as in poem, novel. It is interesting because an author will tell it in beauty of words, phrases, sentences even passages and books. They may express about themselves, their surrounding, environment, society condition, nature, politic, history or criticism of something. According to Engels which rewritten by Laurenson and Swingewood (1972), he stated that literature as reflection of social processes. It means that literature as written language product is related to society that gives colors in the work. Basing on explanation above, it is clear that literary work is product of society. An author is not able to be separated from the society or environment, they relate each others, and it is harmony. In creating literary work, he will be influenced by surrounding, and the result of writing, literary work, is going to influence the readers as society members. According to Wellek and Warren (1948: 3), literature is “creative, an art”. In this term, they stated that literature is a creativity work in art. This term is still wide and common. Then, Cuddon (1999: 472) defines literature as “a vague term which usually denotes works which belong to the major genres: epic, drama, lyric, novel, short story ode.” Cuddon is able to give explanation clearer than Wellek and Warren, he give the types or work of it. 1 2 In several literary works express many features of thought and feeling on subjects as varied as social class, work, love, religion, nature, and art.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of Plot in Charles Dicken's Novel
    A DESCRIPTION OF PLOT IN CHARLES DICKEN’S NOVEL OLIVER TWIST A PAPER WRITTEN BY JULIANATIKA REG.NO : 152202038 DIPLOMA III ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATERA MEDAN 2018 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I am Julianatika, declare that I am sole of the author of this paper. Except where references is made in the text of this paper, this paper contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a paper by which I have qualified for a awarded degree. No other person‘s work has been used without due acknowledgement in this main text of this paper. This paper has not been submitted for the award of another degree in any tertiary education. Signed: ................... Date : November 2018 i UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA COPYRIGHT DECLARATION Name : Julianatika Title of Paper : A DESCRIPTION OF PLOT IN CHARLES DICKEN‘S NOVEL OLIVER TWIST Qualification : D-III / Ahli Madya Study Program : English I am willing that my paper should be available for reproduction at the discretion of the Librarian of the Diploma III English Study Program Faculty of Cultural Studies, University of North Sumatera the understanding that users are made aware of their obligation under law of the Republic of Indonesia. Signed: ......................... Date: November 2018 ii UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA ABSTRACT The title of this paper is A Description of Plot In Charles Dicken’s Novel “Oliver Twist”. Plot is the literary element that contains the event has cause in a story where the event has cause and effect relation.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of John Burnett Turner, Jr
    Descendants of John Burnett Turner, Jr By Nyla Creed DePauk John Burnett Turner, Jr., was born November 26, 1847, in Patrick County, Virginia. John died April 27, 1933 in Marsh Fork District, Raleigh County, West Virginia. John was the son of John Burnett Turner, Sr., and Naomi Angeline Exoney Via who settled in Raleigh County about 1857. John, Jr., is buried at Drews Creek Hollow. The cemetery is in Canterbury Branch of Drews Creek, Raleigh County. John married first Jemima Jane Canterbury on May 28, 1868, in Raleigh County. The marriage was performed by the Reverend Andrew Workman. Jemima was the daughter of Rufus Canterbury and Susannah Dickens. She was born about 1848 in Fayette County, and died in June 1888 in Raleigh County. John married second Nancy Jackson on April 1, 1889, in Raleigh County. Nancy was the daughter of Mabane Jackson and Sarah Dew. She was born February 26, 1855, in Raleigh County, and died after 1900 in Raleigh County. John married third Mary Jane Lewis about 1906. Mary was the daughter of Charles Lewis and Martha Fleshman. She was born October 14, 1865, in Trap Hill District, Raleigh County, and died November 1, 1932, in Munitions, Marsh Fork District, Raleigh County. Children of John Turner and Jemima Canterbury are: 1. Louisa Elizabeth "Lizzie" Turner was born November 30, 1869 in Raleigh County. She married first William Jewell on March 22, 1886, in Raleigh County. He was born 1860 in Prince William County, Virginia, and died about 1889. She married second Andrew Wilson Webb on September 25, 1889, in Raleigh County.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Recovered from Obscurity: “Structures of Feeling” and Discourses of Identity and Power Relations Through the Peripher
    Thesis Recovered from Obscurity: “Structures of Feeling” and Discourses of Identity and Power Relations through the Peripheral Characters in the Novels of Charles Dickens. by Ivan Pragasan Pillay Supervisor: Dr C.A. Woeber 1 Recovered from Obscurity: “Structures of Feeling” and Discourses of Identity and Power Relations through the Peripheral Characters in the Novels of Charles Dickens Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English (University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg: 2011) This whole thesis, unless specifically indicated to the contrary in the text, is my own, original work. ____________________ Ivan Pragasan Pillay 2 I dedicate this work to Ma af 3 Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the abiding grace of Jesus Christ who, as He promised, never did leave nor forsake me. And, lest I forget: My supervisor, Dr Catherine A. Woeber for selflessly going beyond the call of duty to see this work through to its conclusion. Her expertise and professionalism, in setting and maintaining the required standards at all times, has enriched me and I remain indebted to her. My dear friends, the Jogessar family: Jamesy, Rosy, Alice and Sharma who urged me on and picked me up when, at times, it seemed as though the finish was, infinitely, beyond my reach. They were my seconds throughout this, often, gruelling marathon. My son, Courtney Austin and daughter, Claire Ann for believing in me. My mother Pat, aunt Loga and the rest of my family for their unstinting love and support. My colleagues Suren Naidoo and Roy Somaru for never being too far away when it mattered most.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Bear, Was a Cree Chief Who Was Involved, Albeit Not by Choice, in the 1885 Resistance
    Mistahimaskwa (c1825-1888): Biography Mistahimaskwa, or Big Bear, was a Cree chief who was involved, albeit not by choice, in the 1885 Resistance. He is perhaps one of the most misunderstood figures in Canadian history. Little is known about his early years. He was born around 1825 near Jackfish Lake and Fort Carlton, which are now in present-day Saskatchewan. His heritage was Saulteaux through his father, Muckitoo or Black Powder, a minor chief of a mixed Cree- Saulteaux band and Plains Cree, through his mother, whose name is unknown. Although his father was Saulteaux and he could speak Saulteaux, Mistahimaskwa considered himself Cree. Mistahimaskwa was a traditional spiritual person. His Manitou spirit was the bear: in his youth he received a vision from the Bear Spirit – the Cree’s most powerful animal Manitou. His name, song, and power bundle were a result of the visitation. His power bundle consisted of a skinned-out bear’s paw with its claws intact, which was sewn onto a scarlet flannel. Mistahimaskwa believed that when he wore this power bundle around his neck nothing could harm him because the Bear Spirit’s power rested against his soul. First Nations Oral Tradition maintains that Mistahimaskwa wore this bundle during times of danger. The bundle gave him great courage. Near the end of his life he became a baptized Catholic. In his early years, Mistahimaskwa spent most of his time hunting bison. His mixed Cree-Saulteaux band traveled throughout the remaining bison hunting grounds of what are now Saskatchewan, Alberta, and Montana. In other parts of the year, his people camped in the woods of what are now north-central Alberta and Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Dickens and the Jamiesons
    The Jamieson Connection with the Charles Dickens Family By Betty Hagberg Late in the year of 1885, Alexander Jamieson was in Ottawa, Canada and met Francis Jeffery Dickens, son of the famous English author Charles Dickens. Captain Dickens was just completing his service with the Northwest Mounted Police. Alexander invited Francis to visit his family in Moline and consider undertaking a speaking tour of the United States. Charles Dickens and his wife Catherine had a family of 10 children. Francis Jeffrey Dickens was the fifth child and third son. He was known as Frank in the family and given the nickname “chickenstalker” by his Charles Dickens father, supposedly because he like to play hunting games as a child. None of the Dickens children really lived up to the expectations of their illustrious father, and Francis was no exception. As was the family custom he was sent to boarding school in France at the age of 7. Reportedly his father directed he be given a shot of port everyday to help build his strength. By 14 he was in Germany studying languages with the hope of going into medicine. He eventually gave up the idea of becoming a physician because of his stammer, but he did gain proficiency in both French and German. As a young man he worked in the family publication business “All Francis Jeffrey Dickens the Year Round” the weekly literary magazine owned by his father. This publication published some of Charles Dickens novels in serial form. At age 20 Francis left Britain for India, where he thought he would join his older brother Walter, only to find on arrival that Walter had died of an aneurism.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Ferron's Canada
    Jacques Ferron’s canada Jacques Ferron’s Alberta, and Mine Ray Ellenwood Department of English, York University was a rare bird from the west among Jacques plus que Dieu, et le Révérend Ellenwood est Ferron’s acquaintance, a fact that certainly devenu farmer. I stimulated our conversation and correspondence. The caption of the picture reads: “Le Père Lacombe, Even though I’d left Alberta in 1967, and have lived âgé de 88 ans, va, une dernière fois, prêcher à Ste- in Toronto since 1972, the prairie remains important Marie de Calgary (13 mars 1913).” In very obvious in my personal mythology, though not of much contrast, pasted on the back of the envelope was a interest to anyone I’ve known except Ferron, who photograph of a cowboy, identified as Buck Steele, had his own mythology of the west, based on very limited experience but extensive reading. “Let us compare mythologies,” wrote the poet, and Ferron and I certainly did, usually facetiously, but often very informatively, at least for myself. Let me give you some examples. Our correspondence began in 1973, and within months I was holding forth about my grandfather Ellenwood having come to Alberta from Yarmouth Nova Scotia by way of McGill University and Richmond, Québec (where he taught at St. Francis College and met and married his wife) to Cache Creek B.C., and eventually to Red Deer, Alberta, in 1903. Ferron responded with some of what he called Alberta “pre-history” about Blackfoot Indians and Father Lacombe, the charismatic Oblate missionary who was obviously one of his heroes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cd His Last 13 Years.Pdf へのリンク
    Preface It is essential to draw the real image of an author as faithfully as possible not only for the sake of the author himself but for the interpretation of his works. The biography of Charles Dickens has been written by many writers, but regrettably they all have overlooked the important fact that Dickens underwent ‘conversion’ in the sense of ‘a spiritual change from sinfulness, ungodliness, or worldliness to love of God and pursuit of holiness’ (OED) in 1860. Three years earlier Dickens employed the three professional actresses, Mrs. Thomas Lawless Ternan, her second daughter Maria and her third, Ellen, for the August performance of The Frozen Deep by his amateur theatricals. Soon he became infatuated with the 18-year-old Ellen, made her his mistress, and denied the fact to the public although some persons knew of his love affair. The hard changes in his circumstances ensued thereafter, and they caused the conversion within him, after which he suffered from his compunction and remorse, made efforts to improve himself, and died as a penitent Christian man. Without grasping this operation of his mind we could neither draw the real image of Charles Dickens himself nor could we understand his works from A Tale of Two Cities to The Mystery of Edwin Drood satisfactorily. In this book his spiritual operation in the last 13 years i from 1857 to his death will be revealed by the four essays: ‘Dickens and Gad’s Hill Place,’ ‘Reading Dickens’s three novels: David Copperfield, A Tale of Two Cities, and Great Expectations,’ ‘Dickens Self-Denying,’ and ‘Dickens Cornered.’ The first of the four was published in The Japan Branch Bulletin of the Dickens Fellowship (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Shift of the Colour-Terms Maroon and Magenta in British Standard English
    BIBLID 1133-1127 (2011) p. 341-374 Received 16 March 2010 · Accepted 23 April 2011 Semantic shift of the colour-terms maroon and magenta in British Standard English Laura Wright · University of Cambridge (England, UK) ABSTRACT This paper considers the changing referent of the colour terms maroon and magenta. Maroon was a specialised technical term in the mid-eighteen-hundreds within the field of artists’ colours, and the term magenta was introduced in 1860 in the newly-invented chemical dye industry. Both terms spread out into general usage, and in the case of maroon, caused earlier meanings to be disturbed and displaced so that today they are either forgotten or shifted into register-specific usage (namely, North American bureaucratic English and other Extraterritorial English bureaucratic varieties). It is speculated that the English artists’ colours firm of Winsor and Newton had a role in retarding the American sense-development of the colour term maroon, as this firm had a near-monopoly in late nineteenth-century America. Thus, the paper offers a description of semantic change from specialised usage to general usage, with a restriction of specialised usage remaining in a specific functional context. Data is taken from artists’ handbooks, tint-cards and paint catalogues; from police report forms, wanted persons notices, and other official bureaucratic forms; and mention is also made of the novels and letters of Charles Dickens. Keywords: Aniline dye, artists’ colours, Bureaucratic English, Charles Dickens, colour terms, historical semantics, magenta, maroon, semantic change. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 17 (2011) 341 1. Introduction Although this paper is about the specialised usage of two colour terms within the fields of artists’ colours and the chemical dye industry, we begin not with texts from those domains but with the writings of Charles Dickens.
    [Show full text]
  • Dickens and Gad's Hill Place
    1 2007 年春季総会 『ディケンズ・フェロウシップ日本支部年報』 第 30 号（2007 年 10 月） Dickens and Gad’s Hill Place Takeshi TERAUCHI Charles Dickens took two heavy traumas in his life; one was in his poor childhood, the other in the period of 1857-58. He raised his status in life by the first trauma, and purged his own spirit by the second, and at the core of the traumas there was Gad’s Hill Place. This will be revealed in the present paper. 1 The first trauma John Dickens, a clerk in the Royal Navy Pay Office, was very sloppy with money. He borrowed £200, though his salary rose to £441, during the period of 1817–22 when he was posted to Chatham Dockyard, Kent; he spent too much money on parties, social gatherings, the theater, and things like clothes, furnishing, food and drink for his grow- ing family. It was at such a hard time that he often brought his eldest son Charles to the Gad’s Hill of Higham by Rochester, and he often said, looking up at the Place on the summit of the Hill, to Charles, ‘If you were to be very persevering, and were to work hard, you might some day come to live in it’ (Forster 1: 4–5; Letters 8: 265–66 and nn; Dickens, Traveller, Ch. 7). The Place had been built by a self-made who rose from an ostler into a brewer of Rochester and into Mayor of Rochester (Letters 7: 531n; Letters 8: 265 and n). John, who was transferred back to London in 1822, wasted more and more money, and, in debt for £40, he was arrested and imprisoned in the Marshalsea Debtors’ Prison in February 1824; soon his wife Elizabeth with her four small children moved into his prison room.
    [Show full text]
  • March 02, 2002 (London TIMES) a Tale of Two Dickens by PETER ACKROYD
    March 02, 2002 (London TIMES) A Tale of Two Dickens BY PETER ACKROYD To the world he was a literary genius, a loving husband and father - but the private letters of Charles Dickens reveal an angry obsessive living a double life WHEN Charles Dickens made his last tour of America in 1868, President Andrew Johnson booked a box at the Carroll Hall theatre in Washington seven nights' running to hear the great author give readings from his novels. For one performance the entire US Cabinet occupied the front row. The Supreme Court was there, too. Dickens was at the height of his powers - a man whose brilliance was only matched by his celebrity. For thirty years he had been a sensation. Yet within two years he was dead, worn out in mind and body by the demands of his public and his own insatiable compulsion to work. He was the most famous author in the English-speaking world; he had captured for generations to come the squalor, the vigour and the injustices of his era. But Dickens himself was unhappy and oppressed, filled so much with resentment and remorse that he often forgot he was a famous man and wandered once more down the dark ways of his childhood. It is only now, more than 130 years later, that the twelfth and final volume of his private letters reveals Dickens to be a man as extraordinary as any of his literary creations. The publication sets the seal on a scholarly enterprise almost without parallel in English letters for its comprehensiveness and detail.The first volume of correspondence was published in 1965 and through 12 books Dickens's career takes on a wonderful shape and coherence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edmonton Journal
    Behind Canada's only mass hanging; Edmonton author crafts unconventional history of flashpoint in Northwest Rebellion Edmonton Journal Oct 25 2009 Byline: Diana Davidson The Frog Lake Reader Myrna Kostash NeWest Press 260 pp., $26.95 In the second chapter of The Frog Lake Reader, Edmonton author Myrna Kostash describes standing at a 19th-century burial site a few hours east of the city. "Shoulder-high in grass and bramble, wild rose bushes, and aspen deadfall," she writes, the "calm beauty of the fields spread out all around belied the violence and tragedy commemorated here." The tragedy and violence at Frog Lake marked the beginning of the Northwest Rebellion and is the subject of Kostash's ninth book. Most readers will know that the rebellion and its famous Métis leader, Louis Riel, emerged during a time of change, tension, and miscommunication between the federal government, new settlers, fur traders, indigenous and emerging cultures in a young country. Frustrated by a government that was not honouring their treaties, a struggling one-trade economy and a disappearing buffalo population, Cree and Métis people in the Prairies started to organize and protest in the 1880s--a rising tide punctuated by Chief Big Bear's refusal to sign Treaty Six in 1876. By 1885, relations had deteriorated and rebellions had begun. Batoche and Duck Lake are two battle sites often cited in history texts. Kostash's book brings our attention to the conflict at Frog Lake settlement, northwest of modern-day Lloydminster, over Easter 1885. Big Bear's son, Imasees, and the Cree chief Wandering Spirit led a group of men in an attack on white settlers, forcing them into the Catholic church.
    [Show full text]