The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century Yota Batsaki Dumbarton Oaks
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Richard Bradley's Illicit Excursion Into Medical Practice in 1714
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PubMed Central RICHARD BRADLEY'S ILLICIT EXCURSION INTO MEDICAL PRACTICE IN 1714 by FRANK N. EGERTON III* INTRODUCTION The development of professional ethics, standards, practices, and safeguards for the physician in relation to society is as continuous a process as is the development of medicine itself. The Hippocratic Oath attests to the antiquity of the physician's concern for a responsible code of conduct, as the Hammurabi Code equally attests to the antiquity of society's demand that physicians bear the responsibility of reliable practice." The issues involved in medical ethics and standards will never be fully resolved as long as either medicine or society continue to change, and there is no prospect of either becoming static. Two contemporary illustrations will show the on-going nature of the problems of medical ethics. The first is a question currently receiving international attention and publicity: what safeguards are necessary before a person is declared dead enough for his organs to be transplanted into a living patient? The other illustration does not presently, as far as I know, arouse much concern among physicians: that medical students carry out some aspects of medical practice on charity wards without the patients being informed that these men are as yet still students. Both illustrations indicate, I think, that medical ethics and standards should be judged within their context. If and when a consensus is reached on the criteria of absolute death, the ethical dilemma will certainly be reduced, if not entirely resolved. If and when there is a favourable physician-patient ratio throughout the world and the economics of medical care cease to be a serious problem, then the relationship of medical students to charity patients may become subject to new consideration. -
Occasional Papers from the Lindley Library © 2011
Occasional Papers from The RHS Lindley Library IBRARY L INDLEY L , RHS VOLUME FIVE MARCH 2011 Eighteenth-century Science in the Garden Cover illustration: Hill, Vegetable System, vol. 23 (1773) plate 20: Flower-de-luces, or Irises. Left, Iris tuberosa; right, Iris xiphium. Occasional Papers from the RHS Lindley Library Editor: Dr Brent Elliott Production & layout: Richard Sanford Printed copies are distributed to libraries and institutions with an interest in horticulture. Volumes are also available on the RHS website (www. rhs.org.uk/occasionalpapers). Requests for further information may be sent to the Editor at the address (Vincent Square) below, or by email ([email protected]). Access and consultation arrangements for works listed in this volume The RHS Lindley Library is the world’s leading horticultural library. The majority of the Library’s holdings are open access. However, our rarer items, including many mentioned throughout this volume, are fragile and cannot take frequent handling. The works listed here should be requested in writing, in advance, to check their availability for consultation. Items may be unavailable for various reasons, so readers should make prior appointments to consult materials from the art, rare books, archive, research and ephemera collections. It is the Library’s policy to provide or create surrogates for consultation wherever possible. We are actively seeking fundraising in support of our ongoing surrogacy, preservation and conservation programmes. For further information, or to request an appointment, please contact: RHS Lindley Library, London RHS Lindley Library, Wisley 80 Vincent Square RHS Garden Wisley London SW1P 2PE Woking GU23 6QB T: 020 7821 3050 T: 01483 212428 E: [email protected] E : [email protected] Occasional Papers from The RHS Lindley Library Volume 5, March 2011 B. -
A Naturalist Lost – CP Thunberg's Disciple Johan Arnold
九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository A naturalist lost – C. P. Thunberg’s disciple Johan Arnold Stützer (1763–1821) in the East Indies Wolfgang, Michel Faculty of Languages and Cultures, Kyushu University : Professor emeritus http://hdl.handle.net/2324/1563681 出版情報:Japanese collections in European museums : reports from the Toyota-Foundation- Symposium Königswinter 2003. 3, pp.147-162, 2015-03-01. Bier'sche Verlagsanstalt バージョン: 権利関係: A NATURALIST LOST - C. P. THUNBERG'S DISCIPLE JOHAN ARNOLD STUTZER (1763-1821) IN THE EAST INDIES Wolfgang MICHEL, Fukuoka Johan Arnold Stiitzer was one of two disciples man barber surgeon, Martin Christian Wilhelm of the renowned Swedish scholar Carl Peter Stiitzer (1727- 1806). Martin Stiitzer had im Thunberg who traveled overseas as an employ migrated from Oranienburg (Prussia) to Stock ee of the Dutch East India Company to lay the holm during the 17 50s. After traveling to the foundations of an academic career. Following West Indies in 1757 and undertaking further in the footsteps of his famous teacher, he even studies including an examination to become managed to work as a surgeon at the Dutch trad a surgeon in 1760, he married Anna Maria ing post ofDejima in Nagasaki. However, after Soem (?- 1766), whose father, Christian Soem years of rapidly changing circumstances and ( 1694-1775), was also a barber surgeon. 1 twists and turns, this promising young naturalist Surgeons were educated and organized settled down to serve the British in Ceylon with in guilds and, like his father-in-law, Martin out ever returning to Europe. While most of the Stiitzer took part in the fight for recognition objects collected by Westerners in Japan ended and reputation. -
A Translation of the Linnaean Dissertation the Invisible World
BJHS 49(3): 353–382, September 2016. © British Society for the History of Science 2016 doi:10.1017/S0007087416000637 A translation of the Linnaean dissertation The Invisible World JANIS ANTONOVICS* AND JACOBUS KRITZINGER** Abstract. This study presents the first translation from Latin to English of the Linnaean disser- tation Mundus invisibilis or The Invisible World, submitted by Johannes Roos in 1769. The dissertation highlights Linnaeus’s conviction that infectious diseases could be transmitted by living organisms, too small to be seen. Biographies of Linnaeus often fail to mention that Linnaeus was correct in ascribing the cause of diseases such as measles, smallpox and syphilis to living organisms. The dissertation itself reviews the work of many microscopists, especially on zoophytes and insects, marvelling at the many unexpected discoveries. It then discusses and quotes at length the observations of Münchhausen suggesting that spores from fungi causing plant diseases germinate to produce animalcules, an observation that Linnaeus claimed to have confirmed. The dissertation then draws parallels between these findings and the conta- giousness of many human diseases, and urges further studies of this ‘invisible world’ since, as Roos avers, microscopic organisms may cause more destruction than occurs in all wars. Introduction Here we present the first translation from Latin to English of the Linnaean dissertation published in 1767 by Johannes Roos (1745–1828) entitled Dissertatio academica mundum invisibilem, breviter delineatura and republished by Carl Linnaeus (1707– 1778) several years later in the Amoenitates academicae under the title Mundus invisibi- lis or The Invisible World.1 Roos was a student of Linnaeus, and the dissertation is important in highlighting Linnaeus’s conviction that infectious diseases could be trans- mitted by living organisms. -
© 2008 Stephanie Volmer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
© 2008 Stephanie Volmer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PLANTING A NEW WORLD: LETTERS AND LANGUAGES OF TRANSATLANTIC BOTANICAL EXCHANGE, 1733-1777 By STEPHANIE VOLMER A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Literatures in English written under the direction of Myra Jehlen and approved by ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2008 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Planting a New World: Letters and Languages of Transatlantic Botanical Exchange, 1733-1777 by STEPHANIE VOLMER Dissertation Director: Myra Jehlen My dissertation describes an important change in the accepted understanding and imagination of nature. This change took place over the course of the eighteenth century, when nature, from being conceived of as a settled state subject to cyclical change, came to be seen as mobile and mutable. The sense of a mobile, mutable nature--the dissertation's central trope--arose from the experience of travel and discovery, which was accompanied from the first by a vigorous process of transplantation. Plants and seeds were carried across oceans, having been dug up on one continent to be replanted often in another. From being static and predictable, plant life therefore became, for scholars and poets alike, dynamic, mutable, and adaptable. I focus on the writings of a small group of men in the Anglo-American world, including John and William Bartram, Peter Collinson, Alexander Garden, John Ellis, and Carl Linnaeus, who were engaged in the work of transporting, planting, writing about, and classifying botanical objects. -
Opening the Curiosity Box
Opening the curiosity box: Botanical images as sites of transformation for the scientific practices of annotation and display in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Karen Stewart Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Masters of Philosophy, Visual Arts (Illustration) at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Professor Keith Dietrich MARCH 2007 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration: I, the undersigned declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it at any university for a degree. Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Summary This thesis investigates the hidden narratives of South African botanical images made in the late seventeenth to eighteenth century. Plant collecting and image making was part of early modernist scientific practice of collection and display. These images are examined from postmodern perspectives that treat them as "texts" that validated colonial botanical agendas. Botanical art objectified "nature" enforcing it into a textual code that sanitised it and made it suitable for study by Eurocentric natural philosophers. The impact of particular scientific agendas about "nature" can be linked to the stereotyping and subjugation of both indigenous knowledge systems and women. This thesis considers the impact that the complex historical and socio-political situations of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries had to bear on the discursive formations associated with the botanical sciences, of which botanical art forms an integral part. The process whereby indigenous knowledge was effectively written out of acceptable botanical practice (a trend that persists today) is evaluated. -
A Selection of New Arrivals September 2017
A selection of new arrivals September 2017 Rare and important books & manuscripts in science and medicine, by Christian Westergaard. Flæsketorvet 68 – 1711 København V – Denmark Cell: (+45)27628014 www.sophiararebooks.com AMPERE, Andre-Marie. Mémoire. INSCRIBED BY AMPÈRE TO FARADAY AMPÈRE, André-Marie. Mémoire sur l’action mutuelle d’un conducteur voltaïque et d’un aimant. Offprint from Nouveaux Mémoires de l’Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres de Bruxelles, tome IV, 1827. Bound with 18 other pamphlets (listed below). [Colophon:] Brussels: Hayez, Imprimeur de l’Académie Royale, 1827. $38,000 4to (265 x 205 mm). Contemporary quarter-cloth and plain boards (very worn and broken, with most of the spine missing), entirely unrestored. Preserved in a custom cloth box. First edition of the very rare offprint, with the most desirable imaginable provenance: this copy is inscribed by Ampère to Michael Faraday. It thus links the two great founders of electromagnetism, following its discovery by Hans Christian Oersted (1777-1851) in April 1820. The discovery by Ampère (1775-1836), late in the same year, of the force acting between current-carrying conductors was followed a year later by Faraday’s (1791-1867) first great discovery, that of electromagnetic rotation, the first conversion of electrical into mechanical energy. This development was a challenge to Ampère’s mathematically formulated explanation of electromagnetism as a manifestation of currents of electrical fluids surrounding ‘electrodynamic’ molecules; indeed, Faraday directly criticised Ampère’s theory, preferring his own explanation in terms of ‘lines of force’ (which had to wait for James Clerk Maxwell (1831-79) for a precise mathematical formulation). -
The Linnaean Collections
THE LINNEAN SPECIAL ISSUE No. 7 The Linnaean Collections edited by B. Gardiner and M. Morris WILEY-BLACKWELL 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ © 2007 The Linnean Society of London All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The designations of geographic entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publishers, the Linnean Society, the editors or any other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The Linnaean Collections Introduction In its creation the Linnaean methodology owes as much to Artedi as to Linneaus himself. So how did this come about? It was in the spring of 1729 when Linnaeus first met Artedi in Uppsala and they remained together for just over seven years. It was during this period that they not only became the closest of friends but also developed what was to become their modus operandi. Artedi was especially interested in natural history, mineralogy and chemistry; Linnaeus on the other hand was far more interested in botany. Thus it was at this point that they decided to split up the natural world between them. Artedi took the fishes, amphibia and reptiles, Linnaeus the plants, insects and birds and, while both agreed to work on the mammals, Linneaus obligingly gave over one plant family – the Umbelliforae – to Artedi “as he wanted to work out a new method of classifying them”. -
Laurent Garcin, Mdfrs
LAURENT GARCIN, M.D. F.R.S.: A FORGOTTEN SOURCE FOR N. L. BURMAN’S FLORA INDICA (1768) ALEXANDRA COOK1 Abstract. Laurent Garcin (ca. 1681–1751), a Dutch East India Company ship’s surgeon, Fellow of the Royal Society and correspond- ing member of the Académie royale des sciences (Paris), has largely vanished from the annals of botanical and medical science. Yet data presented in this article demonstrate that ca. 1740 he gave some or all of his plant collections from his Asian travels in the 1720s to J. Burman, a correspondent in Amsterdam. Those collections in turn greatly enriched Flora Indica by N. Burman (hereafter Burman fil.) to the tune of 98 specimens. Burman’s work is an important historical source for the botany not only of modern-day India, as the title suggests, but also of Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Iran—the “Indies” as they were understood in the eighteenth century. So far only a handful of Garcin’s specimens have come to light (G-Burman). These few extant specimens testify to Garcin’s collecting zeal and keen eye for materia medica. Keywords: Asia, Johannes Burman, Cinnamomum, Garcinia, materia medica, Salvadora Laurent Garcin (ca. 1681–1751),2 a Franco-Swiss botanist, of the Swiss Confederation) (Chambrier 1900: 251; Bridel Dutch East India Company (hereafter VOC) ship’s surgeon, 1831: 99). Upon joining the VOC Garcin himself reported Fellow of the Royal Society and corresponding member that he came from Nyon, a town in the canton of Vaud not of the Académie royale des sciences (Paris), has largely far from Geneva. -
Linnaeus Tussen Lapland En Leiden
Marga Coesèl Driehonderd jaar geleden werd de beroemde Zweedse natuuronderzoeker Carl Linnaeus geboren. De basis voor zijn werk werd gelegd tijdens zijn reis door Lapland en zijn verblijf in Nederland. Linnaeus tussen Lapland en Leiden Op een mooie dag in het voorjaar van 1732 vertrok Carl Linnaeus op zijn paard vanuit Uppsala naar het hoge noorden. Zijn reis- doel was Lapland, een vrijwel onbewoond en in die tijd nog nauwelijks bekend gebied. Er stond hem een avontuurlijke tocht te wachten, door dichte bossen en verraderlijke moerassen, over hoge bergen en langs ongebaande wegen. Het ging de 25-jarige Linnaeus echter niet om het avontuur. Hij maakte de reis omdat hij met eigen ogen wilde kennismaken met de flora en fauna van dit ongerepte gebied. Linnaeus had vanaf zijn vroegste jeugd een passie voor de natuur. JEUGD OP DE PASTORIE Carl Linnaeus werd in mei 1707 geboren als oudste zoon van een predikant in de gemeente Stenbrohult, in de provincie Smaland.˚ Bij de pastorie was een kleine bloementuin die door zijn vader liefdevol werd onderhouden. Van hem leerde Carl de namen van de planten die er groeiden en ook die van de wilde planten uit de omge- ving. Op het gymnasium in het nabijgelegen stadje Växjö werd zijn belangstelling voor de natuur verder aangewakkerd door zijn leraar, Johan Rothman. Hoewel zijn ouders liever hadden gezien dat hij net als zijn vader predikant zou worden, besloot Carl om na het gymnasium medicijnen te gaan studeren. Een academische studie plant- en dierkunde Portretfoto van Linnaeus naar het schilderij van Martin Hoffman uit 1737. -
Annals Cover 5
THIS VOLUME CONTAINS A BIBLIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF DECEASED BRYOZOOLOGISTS WHO RESEARCHED FOSSIL AND LIVING BRYOZOANS. ISBN 978-0-9543644-4-9 INTERNATIONAL 1f;��'f ' ;� BRYOZOOLOGY � EDITED BY ASSOCIATION PATRICK N. WYSE JACKSON & MARY E. SPENCER JONES i Annals of Bryozoology 5 ii iii Annals of Bryozoology 5: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans Edited by Patrick N. Wyse Jackson & Mary E. Spencer Jones International Bryozoology Association 2015 iv © The authors 2015 ISBN 978-0-9543644-4-9 First published 2015 by the International Bryozoology Association, c/o Department of Geology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland. Printed in Ireland. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or stored in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, photocopying, recording or by any other means, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Cover illustrations Front: Photographic portraits of twelve bryozoologists: Top row (from left): Arthur William Waters (England); Hélène Guerin-Ganivet (France); Edward Oscar Ulrich (USA); Raymond Carroll Osburn (USA); Middle row: Ferdinand Canu (France); Antonio Neviani (Italy); Georg Marius Reinald Levinsen (Denmark); Edgar Roscoe Cumings (USA); Bottom row: Sidney Frederic Harmer (England); Anders Hennig (Sweden); Ole Nordgaard (Norway); Ray Smith Bassler (USA). Originals assembled by Ferdinand Canu and sent in a frame to Edgar Roscoe Cumings in and around 1910-1920 (See Patrick N. Wyse Jackson (2012) Ferdinand Canu’s Gallery of Bryozoologists. International Bryozoology Association Bulletin, 8(2), 12-13. Back: Portion of a plate from Alicide d’Orbigny’s Paléontologie française (1850–1852) showing the Cretaceous bryozoan Retepora royana. Background: Structure of Flustra from Robert Hooke’s Micrographia (1665). -
Printing Natural Knowledge
Chapter 3: Printing Natural Knowledge “The purpose of writing may be to persuade the wise and intelligent; or else it may be to persuade everyone in town.” So wrote Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, pro- fessor at the university of Pisa and already the author of an important work on Euclid, to his ex-colleague Marcello Malpighi, just starting out on the faculty at the university of Bologna and about to publish his fundamental work revealing the microstructure of the lungs. Deciding what to publish, and for whom, was no easy matter, still some thirty years after the twin trials of Orazio Morandi and Galileo Galilei. “But if you choose to write to the common citizens of Bo- logna to persuade them about the calumnies made against truth,” Borelli con- tinued, “I conceive that in this case you may use every effort to deride any per- son who peddles a pile of idiocies just to offend virtuous and meritorious people.” 1 Of course, for Borelli, “virtuous and meritorious people” meant per- sons who followed empirical method for the study of nature, exemplified by Galileo; and “truth” meant the truth drawn from the use of that method. “Idio- cies” meant ideas conceived by those whom the Galileians conceived as dogma- tists and mystifiers. Still in the 1660s, whether Galileo’s disciples and their followers would triumph against the dogmatists and mystifiers was by no means clear. The story of their campaign to capture public attention, with all its fits and starts, is far less well known than the content of their ideas. It will occupy us here.