Ernest Rutherford: Scientist Supreme - Iopscience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ernest Rutherford: Scientist Supreme - Iopscience 7/2/2018 Ernest Rutherford: scientist supreme - IOPscience This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy. FEATURE Ernest Rutherford: scientist supreme John Campbell1 Physics World, Volume 11, Number 9 1 Physics Department, Univeristy of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand John Campbell 1998 Phys. World 11 (9) 35 https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/11/9/27 Abstract Ernest Rutherford is one of the most illustrious scientists that the world has ever seen. He achieved enduring international fame because of an incredibly productive life, during which he altered our view of nature on three separate occasions. Combining brilliantly conceived experiments with much hard work and special insight, he explained the perplexing problem of naturally occurring radioactivity, determined the structure of the atom, and was the world's first successful alchemist, changing nitrogen into oxygen. Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS Access this article Login options http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2058-7058/11/9/27/pdf 1/2 Physics World FEATURE Related content - OUR VIEW OF NATURE AS Ernest Rutherford: scientist supreme BROADENED BY SCIENCE John C. Merriam To cite this article: John Campbell 1998 Phys. World 11 (9) 35 - Does physics have a place in schools? Mike Pentney - Environmental monitoring through use of silica-based TLD Z Siti Rozaila, M U Khandaker, S F Abdul View the article online for updates and enhancements. Sani et al. This content was downloaded from IP address 108.171.128.173 on 09/07/2018 at 16:28 One hundred years ago this month, Ernest Rutherford - a talented young New Zea lander who had just spent three years as a postgraduate student in Britain - left for Canada, where he was to do the work that won hima Nobel prize. All three countries can justifiably claim this great scientist as their own Ernest Rutherford: scientist supreme John Campbell ERNEST Rutherford is one of the 1937 - by then very much an elder most illustrious scientists that the statesman of science - the New York world has ever seen. He achieved Times was moved to write the follow- enduring international fame because || ing: "It is given to but few men to of an incredibly productive life, dur- achieve immortality, still less to achieve ing which he altered our view of Olympian rank, during their own life- nature on three separate occasions. time. Lord Rutherford achieved both. Combining brilliantly conceived ex- In a generation that witnessed one of periments with much hard work the greatest revolutions in the entire and special insight, he explained the history of science, he was universally perplexing problem of naturally oc- acknowledged as the leading explorer curring radioactivity, determined the of the vast, infinitely complex universe structure of the atom, and was the within the atom, a universe mat he world's first successful alchemist, was first to penetrate." changing nitrogen into oxygen. Rutherford received a Nobel prize New Zealand - a lucky start for the first discovery, but the other Earnest (sic) Rutherford was born two would have been equally worthy lucky. Although he made his own luck candidates, had they been discovered once he began his scientific research, by someone else. Indeed, any one of Rutherford as a student in New Zealand in about 1892. many things fell fortuitously into place his other secondary achievements - Tall and lean, he was a useful rugby player and led an for him before that. He was lucky that many of which are now almost for- active student life. He soon obtained the standard BA he was born neither a girl nor the degree from Canterbury College as well as masters gotten - would have been enough to degrees in both mathematics and physical sciences. eldest son. He was lucky to have been bring fame to a lesser scientist. For Awarded a research scholarship in 1895, he left to seek brought up surrounded by hardwork- example, he invented an electrical his fortune in Europe. ing, practical people. He was lucky to method for detecting individual ion- have obtained three separate scholar- izing radiations, he dated the age of the Earth, and briefly ships, each on the second attempt. But most of all, he was held the world record for the distance over which wireless lucky to have been born to James and Marma Rutherford. waves could be detected. He predicted the existence of neut- They were a couple who valued education: Martha because rons, he oversaw the development of large-scale particle she had been educated and James because he had not. accelerators, and, during the First World War, he led the His father's family had emigrated from Scotland to New allied research into the detection of submarines. Zealand in 1842, while his mother's had come from England A New Zealander born and bred, Rutherford left his home- in 1855. Botii arrived as children, aged three and twelve, land in 1895 at the age of 23 for Cambridge, where he was to respectively, and the story of how tiiey met is an interesting- become one of the university's first research students. After one (see Rutherford's Ancestors in further reading). His parents three years there he moved again, this time to McGill Uni- married in 1866, and on 30 August 1871 their fourth child (of versity in Canada, which was the scene of some of his most 12) and second son was born in rural Nelson on New Zea- famous early work. He came back to Britain in 1908, first land's South Island. Two months later, the child was mista- spending 11 years at Manchester, before finally returning to kenly registered as "Earnest". Cambridge shortly after the First World War. When he died in The family moved regularly, as James' work dictated. They PHYSICS WORLD SEPTEMBER 1998 35 1 Rutherford's first great discovery - atoms are not and light - although he avoided chemistry, as he knew that [ always stable the teacher was only one step ahead of the class. Out of school, he rose to sergeant in the cadet corps and learnt self- defence in affrays in the college hostel. NOBELPRJS19' In 1890 Ern moved to Canterbury College in Christchurch. The amazing thing about New Zealand at the time was that MF,£NIKOV ,- within 50 years of the crudest European settlement, the EHRL1CH country already boasted a flourishing university system. The RiITHf.RFORD progress was largely due to the Canterbury Association - a group of people in Britain who began colonizing New Zealand in 1850. The association wanted to found a Can- terbury university that would attract students from as far away as India and Australia. When Canterbury College was SVERIGE 35 formally established in 1873 in the town of Christchurch - itself named after the Oxford college - the population of the whole province was a mere 55 000. Sweden issued this SKr 35 stamp in 1968 to commemorate Rutherford's 1908 Nobel prize for his work on radioactivity At Canterbury, Ern entered the full life of an undergra- duate. Tall and lean, he played rugby as a useful forward. On After two years of research in New Zealand, Ernest Rutherford alternative Saturday nights he debated at the Dialectic obtained a scholarship that he eventually chose to take up in Society, on one occasion supporting the motion "that the Cambridge. Such was his skill in experimental work, that within influence of the modern newspaper press is excessive and months of his arrival in 1895 at the age of 24, he was invited to assist dangerous". He also attended the science society, which he the head of the Cavendish Laboratory, J J Thomson, who was trying to once addressed on electrical waves and oscillations. Ern understand how gases could be made to conduct electricity. When lodged in the house of Mary Newton, who had been a Thomson announced the discovery of the electron in 1897, staunch member of the Women's Christian Temperance Rutherford was an immediate convert to the idea of objects smaller Union ever since her husband had drunk himself to death. than atoms. He began to use the newly discovered X-rays and the The group knew that if women were to have some control rays from radioactive materials to help with Thomson's work on over liquor they needed to be enfranchised, and in 1893 - the conduction in gases. first year in which Ern was old enough to appear on the elec- When he moved to McGill University in Canada in 1898, toral roll - New Zealand became the first country in the world Rutherford tried to understand radioactivity. He and his assistants to allow women the vote. But he gained something else from found that thorium gave off an "emanation" that was radioactive; the Newton household: he later married the young daughter, essentially, Rutherford had discovered radon gas. In 1901 he invited Mary (May) Newton. a young chemist, Frederick Soddy, who was initially committed to the On passing the standard BA degree, Rutherford obtained chemists' view that atoms were stable, to do some of the chemical the one scholarship in New Zealand for a masters degree in work. Within three months, they were confidently talkingabout atoms mathematics. Such was his ability that he ended up taking a transmuting into other elements. For this work on radioactivity, double masters degree, also obtaining first-class honours in Rutherford was awarded the 1908 Nobel Prize for Chemistry. physical science. Although both subjects included exams, the latter course also required candidates to carry out an original investigation. What was he to do? He turned down one sug- went to nearby Foxhill for railway construction and farming, gestion to look for the molecular building blocks of life by fol- to Havelock for flax- and saw-milling, and finally to Taranaki lowing electrical discharges in gases, as he felt he did not know on the North Island for flax-milling.
Recommended publications
  • Cathode Rays 89 Cathode Rays
    Cathode Rays 89 Cathode Rays Theodore Arabatzis C The detection of cathode rays was a by-product of the investigation of the discharge of electricity through rarefied gases. The latter phenomenon had been studied since the early eighteenth century. By the middle of the nineteenth century it was known that the passage of electricity through a partly evacuated tube produced a glow in the gas, whose color depended on its chemical composition and its pressure. Below a certain pressure the glow assumed a stratified pattern of bright and dark bands. During the second half of the nineteenth century the discharge of electricity through gases became a topic of intense exploratory experimentation, primarily in Germany [21]. In 1855 the German instrument maker Heinrich Geißler (1815– 1879) manufactured improved vacuum tubes, which made possible the isolation and investigation of cathode rays [23]. In 1857 Geissler’s tubes were employed by Julius Pl¨ucker (1801–1868) to study the influence of a magnet on the electrical dis- charge. He observed various complex and striking phenomena associated with the discharge. Among those phenomena were a “light which appears about the negative electrode” and a fluorescence in the glass of the tube ([9], pp. 122, 130). The understanding of those phenomena was advanced by Pl¨ucker’s student and collaborator, Johann Wilhelm Hittorf (1824–1914), who observed that “if any ob- ject is interposed in the space filled with glow-light [emanating from the negative electrode], it throws a sharp shadow on the fluorescent side” ([5], p. 117). This effect implied that the “rays” emanating from the cathode followed a straight path.
    [Show full text]
  • Rutherford's Nuclear World: the Story of the Discovery of the Nuc
    Rutherford's Nuclear World: The Story of the Discovery of the Nuc... http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/rutherford/sections/atop-physic... HOME SECTIONS CREDITS EXHIBIT HALL ABOUT US rutherford's explore the atom learn more more history of learn about aip's nuclear world with rutherford about this site physics exhibits history programs Atop the Physics Wave ShareShareShareShareShareMore 9 RUTHERFORD BACK IN CAMBRIDGE, 1919–1937 Sections ← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next → In 1962, John Cockcroft (1897–1967) reflected back on the “Miraculous Year” ( Annus mirabilis ) of 1932 in the Cavendish Laboratory: “One month it was the neutron, another month the transmutation of the light elements; in another the creation of radiation of matter in the form of pairs of positive and negative electrons was made visible to us by Professor Blackett's cloud chamber, with its tracks curled some to the left and some to the right by powerful magnetic fields.” Rutherford reigned over the Cavendish Lab from 1919 until his death in 1937. The Cavendish Lab in the 1920s and 30s is often cited as the beginning of modern “big science.” Dozens of researchers worked in teams on interrelated problems. Yet much of the work there used simple, inexpensive devices — the sort of thing Rutherford is famous for. And the lab had many competitors: in Paris, Berlin, and even in the U.S. Rutherford became Cavendish Professor and director of the Cavendish Laboratory in 1919, following the It is tempting to simplify a complicated story. Rutherford directed the Cavendish Lab footsteps of J.J. Thomson. Rutherford died in 1937, having led a first wave of discovery of the atom.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter (PDF)
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE OYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Series A CONTAINING PAPERS OF A MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTER. VOL. LXXXV. LONDON: P rinted for THE ROYAL SOCIETY and S old by HARRISON AND SONS, ST. MARTIN’S LANE, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HIS MAJESTY. N ovember, 1911. LONDON: HARRISON AND SONS, PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HTS MAJESTY, ST. MARTIN’S LANE. CONTENTS --- 0 0 ^ 0 0 ----- SERIES A. VOL. LXXXV. No. A 575.—March 14, 1911. P AG-E The Chemical Physics involved in the Precipitation of Free Carbon from the Alloys of the Iron-Carbon System. By W. H. Hatfield, B. Met. (Sheffield University). Communicated by Prof. W. M. Hicks, F.R.S. (Plates 1—5) ................... .......... 1 On the Fourier Constants of a Function. By W. H. Young, Se.D., F.R.S................. 14 The Charges on Ions in Gases, and some Effects that Influence the Motion of Negative Ions. By Prof. John S. Townsend, F.R.S............................................... 25 On the Energy and Distribution of Scattered Rontgen Radiation. By J. A. Crowtlier, M.A., Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. Com­ municated by Prof. Sir J. J. Thomson, F.R.S...........................*.............................. 29 The Origin of Magnetic Storms. By Arthur Schuster, F.R.S...................................... 44 On the Periodicity of Sun-spots. By Arthur Schuster, F.R.S..................................... 50 The Absorption Spectx*a of Lithium and Caesium. By Prof. P. V. Bevan, M.A., Royal Holloway College. Communicated by Sir J. J. Thomson, F.R.S.............. 54 Dispersion in Vapours of the Alkali Metals. By Prof. P. V. Bevan, M.A., Royal Holloway College.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ethers, Religion and Politics In
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Ethers, religion and politics in late-Victorian physics: beyond the Wynne thesis AUTHORS Noakes, Richard JOURNAL History of Science DEPOSITED IN ORE 16 June 2008 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/30065 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication ETHERS, RELIGION AND POLITICS IN LATE-VICTORIAN PHYSICS: BEYOND THE WYNNE THESIS RICHARD NOAKES 1. INTRODUCTION In the past thirty years historians have demonstrated that the ether of physics was one of the most flexible of all concepts in the natural sciences. Cantor and Hodge’s seminal collection of essays of 1981 showed how during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries British and European natural philosophers invented a range of ethers to fulfil diverse functions from the chemical and physiological to the physical and theological.1 In religious discourse, for example, Cantor identified “animate” and spiritual ethers invented by neo-Platonists, mystics and some Anglicans to provide a mechanism for supporting their belief in Divine immanence in the cosmos; material, mechanistic and contact-action ethers which appealed to atheists and Low Churchmen because such media enabled activity in the universe without constant and direct Divine intervention; and semi-spiritual/semi-material ethers that appealed to dualists seeking a mechanism for understanding the interaction of mind and matter. 2 The third type proved especially attractive to Oliver Lodge and several other late-Victorian physicists who claimed that the extraordinary physical properties of the ether made it a possible mediator between matter and spirit, and a weapon in their fight against materialistic conceptions of the cosmos.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter (PDF)
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Series A CONTAINING PAPERS OF A MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTER. VOL. G LONDON: P rinted for THE ROYAL SOCIETY and Sold by HARRISON AND SONS, Ltd., ST. MARTIN’S LANE,. PRINTERS in ordinary to h is m a jesty . March, 1922. LONDON : HARRISON AND SONS, LTD., PRINTERS IN ORDINARY TO HIS MAJESTY, ST. MARTIN^ LANE. CONTENTS ---------------- SERIES A. VOL. C. i PAGE Minutes of Meetings, November 3, 1021—February 23, 1922 .................................. i No. A 702.—October 4, 1921. On the Velocity of Sound in Gases at High Temperatures, and the Ratio of the Specific Heats. By Harold B. Dixon, C.B.E., F.R.S., Colin Campbell, D.Sc., and A. Parker, D.Sc....................................................................................................... 1 The Ratio of the Specific Heats of Air and of Carbon Dioxide. By J. R. Partington, D.Sc. Communicated by Dr. J. A. Harker, F.R.S............................ 27 On the Currents induced in a Conductor by the Passage of a Mass of Magnetic Material over it. By E. S. Bieler, M.Sc., 1851 Scholar of McGill University. Communicated by Sir E. Rutherford, F.R.S. (Plate 1 ) ............. ................ 1.......... 50 On some New Formuke for the Numerical Calculation of the Mutual Induction of Coaxial Circles. By Louis V. King, D.Sc., Macdonald Professor of Physics, McGill University, Montreal. Communicated by Prof. A. S. Eve, F.R.S......... 60 Gaseous Combustion at High Pressures. Part II.—The Explosion of Hydrogen-Air and Carbon Monoxide-Air Mixtures. By William A rthur Bone, D.Sc., Ph.D., F.R.S.,'and the late William Arthur Haward, M.Sc., Salters’Research Fellow..
    [Show full text]
  • December 4, 1954 NATURE 1037
    No. 4440 December 4, 1954 NATURE 1037 COPLEY MEDALLISTS, 1915-54 is that he never ventured far into interpretation or 1915 I. P. Pavlov 1934 Prof. J. S. Haldane prediction after his early studies in fungi. Here his 1916 Sir James Dewar 1935 Prof. C. T. R. Wilson interpretation was unfortunate in that he tied' the 1917 Emile Roux 1936 Sir Arthur Evans word sex to the property of incompatibility and 1918 H. A. Lorentz 1937 Sir Henry Dale thereby led his successors astray right down to the 1919 M. Bayliss W. 1938 Prof. Niels Bohr present day. In a sense the style of his work is best 1920 H. T. Brown 1939 Prof. T. H. Morgan 1921 Sir Joseph Larmor 1940 Prof. P. Langevin represented by his diagrams of Datura chromosomes 1922 Lord Rutherford 1941 Sir Thomas Lewis as packets. These diagrams were useful in a popular 1923 Sir Horace Lamb 1942 Sir Robert Robinson sense so long as one did not take them too seriously. 1924 Sir Edward Sharpey- 1943 Sir Joseph Bancroft Unfortunately, it seems that Blakeslee did take them Schafer 1944 Sir Geoffrey Taylor seriously. To him they were the real and final thing. 1925 A. Einstein 1945 Dr. 0. T. Avery By his alertness and ingenuity and his practical 1926 Sir Frederick Gow­ 1946 Dr. E. D. Adrian sense in organizing the Station for Experimental land Hopkins 1947 Prof. G. H. Hardy Evolution at Cold Spring Harbor (where he worked 1927 Sir Charles Sherring- 1948 . A. V. Hill Prof in 1942), ton 1949 Prof. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits from Our Past
    M1634 History & Heritage 2016.indd 1 15/07/2016 10:32 Medics, Mechanics and Manchester Charting the history of the University Joseph Jordan’s Pine Street Marsden Street Manchester Mechanics’ School of Anatomy Medical School Medical School Institution (1814) (1824) (1829) (1824) Royal School of Chatham Street Owens Medicine and Surgery Medical School College (1836) (1850) (1851) Victoria University (1880) Victoria University of Manchester Technical School Manchester (1883) (1903) Manchester Municipal College of Technology (1918) Manchester College of Science and Technology (1956) University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (1966) e University of Manchester (2004) M1634 History & Heritage 2016.indd 2 15/07/2016 10:32 Contents Roots of the University 2 The University of Manchester coat of arms 8 Historic buildings of the University 10 Manchester pioneers 24 Nobel laureates 30 About University History and Heritage 34 History and heritage map 36 The city of Manchester helped shape the modern world. For over two centuries, industry, business and science have been central to its development. The University of Manchester, from its origins in workers’ education, medical schools and Owens College, has been a major part of that history. he University was the first and most Original plans for eminent of the civic universities, the Christie Library T furthering the frontiers of knowledge but included a bridge also contributing to the well-being of its region. linking it to the The many Nobel Prize winners in the sciences and John Owens Building. economics who have worked or studied here are complemented by outstanding achievements in the arts, social sciences, medicine, engineering, computing and radio astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • William Bateson: Scientific Correspondence and Papers (MS Add.8634)
    Cambridge University Library, Department of Archives and Modern Manuscripts Finding Aid - William Bateson: Scientific Correspondence and Papers (MS Add.8634) Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.4.0 Printed: February 27, 2019 Language of description: English Cambridge University Library, Department of Archives and Modern Manuscripts https://archive.lib.cam.ac.uk/index.php/william-bateson-scientific-correspondence-and-papers William Bateson: Scientific Correspondence and Papers Table of contents Summary information .................................................................................................................................... 20 Administrative history / Biographical sketch ................................................................................................ 20 Scope and content ......................................................................................................................................... 20 Notes .............................................................................................................................................................. 21 Access points ................................................................................................................................................. 21 Collection holdings ........................................................................................................................................ 22 MS Add.8634/A.1-A.84, Biographical papers (c.1859-1935 & 1972) .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Who Got Moseley's Prize?
    Chapter 4 Who Got Moseley’s Prize? Virginia Trimble1 and Vera V. Mainz*,2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4575, United States 2Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, United States *E-mail: [email protected]. Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley (1887-1915) made prompt and very skilled use of the then new technique of X-ray scattering by crystals (Bragg scattering) to solve several problems about the periodic table and atoms. He was nominated for both the chemistry and physics Nobel Prizes by Svante Arrhenius in 1915, but was dead at Gallipoli before the committees finished their deliberations. Instead, the 1917 physics prize (announced in 1918 and presented on 6 June 1920) went to Charles Glover Barkla (1877-1944) “for discovery of the Röntgen radiation of the elements.” This, and his discovery of X-ray polarization, were done with earlier techniques that he never gave up. Moseley’s contemporaries and later historians of science have written that he would have gone on to other major achievements and a Nobel Prize if he had lived. In contrast, after about 1916, Barkla moved well outside the scientific mainstream, clinging to upgrades of his older methods, denying the significance of the Bohr atom and quantization, and continuing to report evidence for what he called the J phenomenon. This chapter addresses the lives and scientific endeavors of Moseley and Barkla, something about the context in which they worked and their connections with other scientists, contemporary, earlier, and later. © 2017 American Chemical Society Introduction Henry Moseley’s (Figure 1) academic credentials consisted of a 1910 Oxford BA with first-class honors in Mathematical Moderations and a second in Natural Sciences (physics) and the MA that followed more or less automatically a few years later.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Arthur Schuster, F.R.S
    Sir Arthur Schuster. 217 Sir Arthur Schuster, F.R.S. ARTHUR SCHUSTER was born in Frankfurt-on-Main on September 12, 1851, of a wealthy banking family, but emigrated to Manchester with his parents in boyhood. He remained closely connected with Manchester throughout most of his active life, for he occupied first a chair in applied mathematics from 1881 to 1888, and then succeeded Balfour Stewart as Professor of Physics, holding this chair till he retired in 1907. This was the period during which the English provincial universities were expanding, and Schuster took an important part in the development. Schuster's chief period of scientific activity fell in the interregnum between the older discoveries of the era of Maxwell and the newer of radioactivity and the electron. This was a curiously stagnant period in the history of physics, and, though he made many fine contributions to knowledge, there is no great discovery to his name; yet the record of his work shows that he was definitely a precursor of the new physics rather than an elaborator of the old. Perhaps his most noteworthy feat was to have made the first determination of that important physical quantity elm; but the time was not ripe and he explained away the result he obtained, making it plausible to believe that the m was the mass of an atom, instead of the much more startling value thousands of times lighter, the mass of the electron. He also had a great interest in geophysics, and made important studies in meteorology and terrestrial magnetism. In this connection he was closely connected with the establishment of the Eskdalemuir Observatory.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 18: Summer 2005
    History of Physics Group Newsletter No 18 Summer 2005 Contents Editorial 3 Committee and Contacts 4 Past Meetings – 11th Oct 2003 Discoveries, Theories and Natural Philosophers Formulating a theory: J.J. Thomson and Ernest Rutherford’s collaboration on x-ray ionisation by Isobel Falconer 5 30th Oct 2004 Was there life before Einstein? Sir Oliver Lodge and Relativity by Peter Rowlands 19 John Henry Poynting – A Sketch for Future Research by Graham Alfrey 30 Lodge and Poynting – Two brief character sketches by Ben Benedikz 38 Watch this space: the physics of an empty box by Denis Weaire 47 Feature: Newton’s Missing Experiment? by Vicente Aboites 59 Review: Light is a Messenger – The life and science of William Lawrence Bragg reviewed by Kate Crennell 62 Bob Chivers – an obituary by Neil Brown 68 Future Events 69 Abstract 1905 – a miraculous year 72 Editorial There can be few among the world physics community unaware of the many events taking place worldwide to celebrate the centenary of Einstein’s ‘annus mirabilis’. His five papers* of that memorable year are hailed as a turning point ushering in a new era of ‘modern physics’. But did the inspiration for all that prodigious activity spring from his creative genius or to what degree was he influenced by the many ideas which went before? It was to consider this question, that our group met at Birmingham University in October last year, after its Annual General Meeting, to hear a series of lectures under the somewhat ‘tongue in cheek title’: ‘Was there life before Einstein?’ focussing on the state of affairs just before the revolution of 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Arthur Eddington and the Foundations of Modern Physics
    Sir Arthur Eddington and the Foundations of Modern Physics Ian T. Durham Submitted for the degree of PhD 1 December 2004 University of St. Andrews School of Mathematics & Statistics St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland 1 Dedicated to Alyson Nate & Sadie for living through it all and loving me for being you Mom & Dad my heroes Larry & Alice Sharon for constant love and support for everything said and unsaid Maggie for making 13 a lucky number Gram D. Gram S. for always being interested for strength and good food Steve & Alice for making Texas worth visiting 2 Contents Preface … 4 Eddington’s Life and Worldview … 10 A Philosophical Analysis of Eddington’s Work … 23 The Roaring Twenties: Dawn of the New Quantum Theory … 52 Probability Leads to Uncertainty … 85 Filling in the Gaps … 116 Uniqueness … 151 Exclusion … 185 Numerical Considerations and Applications … 211 Clarity of Perception … 232 Appendix A: The Zoo Puzzle … 268 Appendix B: The Burying Ground at St. Giles … 274 Appendix C: A Dialogue Concerning the Nature of Exclusion and its Relation to Force … 278 References … 283 3 I Preface Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity is perhaps the most significant development in the history of modern cosmology. It turned the entire field of cosmology into a quantitative science. In it, Einstein described gravity as being a consequence of the geometry of the universe. Though this precise point is still unsettled, it is undeniable that dimensionality plays a role in modern physics and in gravity itself. Following quickly on the heels of Einstein’s discovery, physicists attempted to link gravity to the only other fundamental force of nature known at that time: electromagnetism.
    [Show full text]