Health and Community Care Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health and Community Care Committee HEALTH AND COMMUNITY CARE COMMITTEE Wednesday 8 May 2002 (Morning) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 8 May 2002 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE .................................................................................................................................. 2643 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION.................................................................................................................. 2644 Food (Figs, Hazelnuts and Pistachios from Turkey) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/148).................................................................................................. 2644 Food (Peanuts from China) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/149)............ 2644 National Health Service (General Medical Services and Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/153) .................................................................... 2644 Food (Jelly Confectionery) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/179) ............. 2645 Adults with Incapacity (Ethics Committee) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/190) ...................... 2645 SCHOOL MEALS (SCOTLAND) BILL ......................................................................................................... 2646 BUDGET PROCESS 2003-04.................................................................................................................. 2681 HEALTH AND COMMUNITY CARE COMMITTEE 13th Meeting 2002, Session 1 CONVENER *Mrs Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD) DEPU TY CONVENER *Margaret Jamieson (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) (Lab) COMMI TTEE MEMBERS *Bill Butler (Glasgow Anniesland) (Lab) *Dorothy-Grace Elder (Glasgow ) (SNP) *Janis Hughes (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab) *Mr John McAllion (Dundee East) (Lab) *Shona Robison (North-East Scotland) (SNP) *Mary Scanlon (Highlands and Islands) (Con) *Nicola Sturgeon (Glasgow ) (SNP) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO ATTENDED : Mr David Davidson (North-East Scotland) (Con) Tommy Sheridan (Glasgow ) (SSP) WITNESSES John Aldridge (Scottish Executive Finance and Central Services Department) Dr Maureen Bruce (Scottish Executive Health Department) Malcolm Chisholm (Minister for Health and Community Care) Gillian Kynoch (Scottish Executive Health Department) Danny Phillips (Child Poverty Action Group in Scotland) Dr Wendy Wrieden (Child Poverty Action Group in Scotland) Ian Young (Health Education Board for Scotland) CLERK TO THE COMMITTE E Jennifer Smart SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Peter McGrath ASSISTANT CLERK Michelle McLean LOC ATION Committee Room 1 2643 8 MAY 2002 2644 Scottish Parliament Subordinate Legislation Health and Community Care Committee Food (Figs, Hazelnuts and Pistachios from Turkey) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Wednesday 8 May 2002 Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/148) The Convener: Item 2 on the agenda is (Morning) consideration of subordinate legislation. This morning we will consider five negative [THE CONVENER opened the meeting at 09:33] instruments. This is the reason why all of us entered politics—the first instrument for consideration is Item in Private the Food (Figs, Hazelnuts and Pistachios from Turkey) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) The Convener (Mrs Margaret Smith): Good Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/148). No comments morning, everybody. Welcome to this morning’s on the instrument have been received from meeting of the Health and Community Care members. The Subordinate Legislation Committee Committee. has received from the Food Standards Agency I suggest that we consider in private agenda explanations of some issues that that committee item 5, which concerns a petition from Epilepsy raised regarding the regulations. No motion to Action Scotland and possible courses of action annul has been lodged, so the recommendation is arising from that. Is that agreed? that the committee does not wish to make any recommendation on the instrument. Is that Members indicated agreement. agreed? Members indicated agreement. Food (Peanuts from China) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/149) The Convener: The second instrument for consideration is the Food (Peanuts from China) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/149). No comments have been received from members. The Subordinate Legislation Committee has received from the Food Standards Agency explanation of some issues that it raised regarding the regulations. No motion to annul has been lodged, so the recommendation is that the committee does not wish to make any recommendation on the instrument. Is that agreed? Members indicated agreement. National Health Service (General Medical Services and Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/153) The Convener: The third instrument for consideration is the National Health Service (General Medical Services and Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/153). No comments have been received from members, and the Subordinate Legislation Committee has made no comments on the instrument. No motion to annul has been lodged, so the recommendation is that 2645 8 MAY 2002 2646 the committee does not wish to make any School Meals (Scotland) Bill recommendation on the instrument. Is that agreed? The Convener: Item 2 on our agenda is Members indicated agreement. consideration of the School Meals (Scotland) Bill. We are the secondary committee on the bill. Our Food (Jelly Confectionery) (Emergency first witness is Ian Young from the Health Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI Education Board for Scotland. Later we will hear 2002/179) from Gillian Kynoch, the Scottish Executive food and health co-ordinator. The Convener: The fourth instrument for consideration is the Food (Jelly Confectionery) Dr Maureen Bruce (Scottish Executive Health Department): My name is Maureen Bruce and I (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/179). No comments have been received am here to support Ian Young and Gillian Kynoch. from members, and the Subordinate Legislation The Convener: We will put the same questions Committee has made no comments on the first to Ian Young from HEBS and then to Gillian instrument. No motion to annul has been lodged, Kynoch. so the recommendation is that the committee does not wish to make any recommendation on the Mary Scanlon (Highlands and Islands) (Con): instrument. Is that agreed? Do you believe that the provision of free school meals to all Scottish school children would have a Members indicated agreement. measurable impact on health? If so, how great would that impact be? Are you aware of any Adults with Incapacity (Ethics Committee) research that has been evaluated regarding the (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/190) effect of school meal provision on health outcomes? The Convener: The fifth instrument for consideration is the Adults with Incapacity (Ethics Ian Young (Health Education Board for Committee) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI Scotland): Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. 2002/190). No comments have been received I accept the basic premise that the inequities in from members, and the Subordinate Legislation our society are the biggest contributor to ill health Committee has made no comments on the and the health problems that exist in Scotland. instrument. No motion to annul has been lodged, There are significant problems with the food that so the recommendation is that the committee does our young people eat, both in and out of school. not wish to make any recommendation on the For that reason, the bill is to be welcomed. instrument. Is that agreed? The quality of school meals has become even Members indicated agreement. more important for young people because of other changes in our society. We accept some of the fundamental premises that are set out in the policy memorandum that is attached to the bill. Mary Scanlon asked whether there was evidence of the impact of school meals on health status. There is plenty of evidence relating to nutrition generally and its impact on young people’s health in their growing years. The policy memorandum refers to that evidence, which is sound. We also know that how young people eat has an impact on their later lives, because they establish dietary behaviours for the future. As we all know, a person’s eating patterns today are not unrelated to what the person ate when he or she was younger. That is something to reflect on. It is certainly true for me and I suspect that it is true for many people. The fact that you still like a piece and jam relates to your earlier upbringing and to what was available to fill you up when you were young. Young people are not unique in that respect. The arguments relating to the stigma that is attached to free school meals are less robust. If members read the original research that is quoted, 2647 8 MAY 2002 2648 they will
Recommended publications
  • Download Issue
    Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 £2.00 Comment Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 t is difficult to maintain constitutional Ineutrality at this tail-end of 2013. Of course we will continue to do our best to keep the SLR open as a space for Contents anyone on the Scottish left, a place where they can feel at home and contribute Comment .......................................................2 to a debate that stretches beyond the boundaries of party or constitutional Democracy in writing ....................................4 position. That is our duty as a magazine Jean Urquhart created expressly for that purpose. Solid foundations for change .........................6 But the duty lies not only on us to Michael Keating keep that space open but on all sides to fill that space. Because it can surely not Our share of the future ..................................8 be possible for us to face the desolation Robin McAlpine which lies across Scottish society in the dog-days of this unlucky year without Graveyard or get-together ..........................10 some sort of answer to what lies all Isobel Lindsay around us. Welfare Nation State ...................................12 What answer to Grangemouth? John McInally Facile talk of ‘the need to work together’ is an insult to the collective intelligence. Labour and the trade unions .......................14 All it states is that if we keep the fork Gregor Gall, Richard Leonard, Bob Crow and let others keep the knife, it will be impossible for us to eat on our own. That Real energy answers ...................................18 may not be a bad thing, but someone Andy Cumbers needs to explain why.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2002
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Scotland Quarterly Report November 2002 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Contents 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 4 2. The Scottish Parliament Mark Shephard 7 3. The Media Philip Schlesinger 11 4. Public Attitudes and identity John Curtice 14 5. Scotland/UK Relations Alex Wright 18 6. Scotland/International Relations Alex Wright 22 7. Relations with Local Government Neil McGarvey 27 9. Legal Disputes Barry Winetrobe 31 10. Political parties James Mitchell 32 11. Public policies Barry Winetrobe 34 2 Key points: James Mitchell — First Minister Jack McConnell became embroiled in an embarrassing internal constituency row over local party funds; — Culture Minister Mike Watson broke collective cabinet responsibility by speaking out—but not voting—against Executive health policy fearing that he might lose votes in the forthcoming Scottish elections; — Herald newspaper went up for sale with the prospect that it will be bought by owners of Scotsman rivals. 3 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 1.1 Collective responsibility The application of the doctrine of collective responsibility has been under the spotlight in the Glasgow hospitals issue. The Culture Minister, Mike Watson, has been a leading public opponent of the reorganisation plan, but voted with the Executive in a debate on the issue on 12 September. His MPA, Janis Hughes, put herself in an even more unusual position, by abstaining on the Executive amendment to the critical SNP motion, but then voting for the as-amended motion. The First Minister refused to sack either, on the basis that they had both adhered to collective responsibility by their votes.
    [Show full text]
  • © Patricia M`Cafferty, May 2004. Abstract
    PATRICIA MCCAFFERTY WORKING THE 'THIRD WAY': NEW LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS, AND SCOTTISH DEVOLUTION THESIS PRESENTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW MAY 2004 © PATRICIA M`CAFFERTY, MAY 2004. ABSTRACT Labour's election victory in 1997 was heralded as a new era, the dawn of a Third Way, a novel attempt to chart a unique political course overcoming the perceivedlimitations of both New Right and Old Labour. In this thesis I explore the era of New Labour generally and, in particular, the impact of the Third Way on working lives. Key to my analysis is New Labour's attempt to synthesise oppositional interests,in particular those of capital and labour. This involves a crucial rhetoric of flexibility, competitivenessand partnership. My research explores the rhetoric of New Labour in relation to the reality of this new force in power. It does this by: " drawing out key features in the development of New Labour, especially its relation to Old Labour; " examining central elementsof New Labour ideology; " arguing that Scotland should be seen as central to the transition from Old to New :Labour; " utilising a case study of industrial relations developments in a major electronics factory in the West of Scotland and, to a lesser extent, key developmentsin public sector employment. My main finding is that where New Labour's ideology promisespositive benefits, the form of its implementation has negative impacts for workers. Since I take New Labour as a process, my thesis concludes with a more speculative exploration of possible future developments,both in relations to New Labour's role in them, and their possible impact on the New Labour project.
    [Show full text]
  • Stewart2019.Pdf
    Political Change and Scottish Nationalism in Dundee 1973-2012 Thomas A W Stewart PhD Thesis University of Edinburgh 2019 Abstract Prior to the 2014 independence referendum, the Scottish National Party’s strongest bastions of support were in rural areas. The sole exception was Dundee, where it has consistently enjoyed levels of support well ahead of the national average, first replacing the Conservatives as the city’s second party in the 1970s before overcoming Labour to become its leading force in the 2000s. Through this period it achieved Westminster representation between 1974 and 1987, and again since 2005, and had won both of its Scottish Parliamentary seats by 2007. This performance has been completely unmatched in any of the country’s other cities. Using a mixture of archival research, oral history interviews, the local press and memoires, this thesis seeks to explain the party’s record of success in Dundee. It will assess the extent to which the character of the city itself, its economy, demography, geography, history, and local media landscape, made Dundee especially prone to Nationalist politics. It will then address the more fundamental importance of the interaction of local political forces that were independent of the city’s nature through an examination of the ability of party machines, key individuals and political strategies to shape the city’s electoral landscape. The local SNP and its main rival throughout the period, the Labour Party, will be analysed in particular detail. The thesis will also take time to delve into the histories of the Conservatives, Liberals and Radical Left within the city and their influence on the fortunes of the SNP.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Convention for Giving Firm Shape to That Will
    We Commend ..... This report is about practical intent. It says: "Here is what we are going to do," not "here is what we would like". Those who seek inspirational home rule rhetoric are respectfully directed elsewhere, including to the Convention's own previous publications. We have moved on. We regard the argument in principle as compelling. The longing of the people of Scotland for their own Parliament rings clear and true every time opinion is sounded. We believe that the momentum for change is now too great to deny; and that a Scottish Parliament will soon be meeting for the first time in nearly three centuries. What has been missing has been a practical scheme for bringing the Parliament into existence, and a hard-headed assessment of what it will be able to achieve. That is the gap which this report fills. This report shows that the Parliament can work, and it shows how. In doing so, it answers opponents who have tried to portray a Scottish Parliament as a pipe- dream, a fantasy which the Scots, unlike other peoples around the world, somehow cannot turn into reality. The Convention has a diverse membership, as diverse as we could make it. Diversity and unanimity are not natural companions. It is the instinct of political parties to disagree with one another, and the instinct of civic groups like the churches, the trade unions and others to be impatient with the preoccupations of politicians. This has meant that a lot of time and effort has been required to arrive at the proposals in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Msps Not Standing Or Not Returned in the 2003
    SESSION 1 MSPS NOT STANDING OR NOT Scottish RETURNED IN THE 2003 ELECTION Parliament Fact sheet A number of MSPs did not return to the Scottish Parliament in Session 2. They either did not stand for re-election or they stood as a candidate but were not re-elected. MSPs: Historical This fact sheets is divided into two sections. The first section lists Series those MSPs who stood for re-election but failed to win a seat. The second section lists those MSPs who were serving at the end of the 25 October 2005 first parliamentary session (31 March 2003) but chose not to stand for re-election. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party 1 MSPs that stood for re-election but failed to win a seat Brian Fitzpatrick Lab Strathkelvin & Bearsden Kenny Gibson SNP Glasgow Rhoda Grant Lab Highlands & Islands Iain Gray Lab Edinburgh Pentlands Keith Harding Con Mid Scotland & Fife John McAllion Lab Dundee East Irene McGugan SNP North East Scotland Lyndsay McIntosh Con Central Scotland Angus Mackay Lab Edinburgh South Fiona McLeod SNP West of Scotland Gil Paterson SNP Central Scotland Lloyd Quinan SNP West of Scotland Michael Russell SNP South of Scotland Dr Richard Simpson Lab Ochil Elaine Thomson Lab Aberdeen North Andrew Wilson SNP Central Scotland MSPs that did not stand for re-election Name Party Constituency or Region Colin Campbell SNP West of Scotland Dorothy-Grace Elder Ind Glasgow Dr Winnie Ewing SNP Highlands & Islands Duncan Hamilton SNP Highlands & Islands Ian Jenkins LD Tweeddale, Ettrick & Lauderdale Rt Hon Henry McLeish Lab Central Fife Rt Hon Sir David Steel KBE LD Lothians Kay Ullrich SNP West of Scotland Ben Wallace Con North East Scotland John Young OBE Con West of Scotland Scottish Parliament Fact sheet 2 Contacting the Public Information Service For more information you can visit our website at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk or contact the Public Information Service.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I15 March April 03.Indd
    scottishleftreview comment Issue 15 March/April 2003 A journal of the left in Scotland brought about since the formation of the t is one of those questions that the partial-democrats Scottish Parliament in July 1999 Imock, but it has never been more crucial; what is your vote for? Too much of our political culture in Britain Contents (although this is changing in Scotland) still sees a vote Comment ...............................................................2 as a weapon of last resort. Democracy, for the partial- democrat, is about giving legitimacy to what was going Vote for us ..............................................................4 to happen anyway. If what was going to happen anyway becomes just too much for the public to stomach (or if Bill Butler, Linda Fabiani, Donald Gorrie, Tommy Sheridan, they just tire of the incumbents or, on a rare occasion, Robin Harper are actually enthusiastic about an alternative choice) then End of the affair .....................................................8 they can invoke their right of veto and bring in the next lot. Tommy Sheppard, Dorothy Grace Elder And then it is back to business as before. Three million uses for a second vote ..................11 Blair is the partial-democrat par excellence. There are David Miller two ways in which this is easily recognisable. The first, More parties, more choice?.................................14 and by far the most obvious, is the manner in which he Isobel Lindsay views international democracy. In Blair’s world view, the If voting changed anything...................................16 purpose of the United Nations is not to make a reasoned, debated, democratic decision but to give legitimacy to the Robin McAlpine actions of the powerful.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle for Roineabhal
    The Battle for Roineabhal Reflections on the successful campaign to prevent a superquarry at Lingerabay, Isle of Harris, and lessons for the Scottish planning system © Chris Tyler The Battle for Roineabhal: Reflections on the successful campaign to prevent a superquarry at Lingerabay, Isle of Harris and lessons for the Scottish planning system Researched and written by Michael Scott OBE and Dr Sarah Johnson on behalf of the LINK Quarry Group, led by Friends of the Earth Scotland, Ramblers’ Association Scotland, RSPB Scotland, and rural Scotland © Scottish Environment LINK Published by Scottish Environment LINK, February 2006 Further copies available at £25 (including p&p) from: Scottish Environment LINK, 2 Grosvenor House, Shore Road, PERTH PH2 7EQ, UK Tel 00 44 (0)1738 630804 Available as a PDF from www.scotlink.org Acknowledgements: Chris Tyler, of Arnisort in Skye for the cartoon series Hugh Womersley, Glasgow, for photos of Sound of Harris & Roineabhal Pat and Angus Macdonald for cover view (aerial) of Roineabhal Turnbull Jeffrey Partnership for photomontage of proposed superquarry Alastair McIntosh for most other photos (some of which are courtesy of Lafarge Aggregates) LINK is a Scottish charity under Scottish Charity No SC000296 and a Scottish Company limited by guarantee and without a share capital under Company No SC250899 The Battle for Roineabhal Page 2 of 144 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Lingerabay Facts & Figures: An Overview 3. The Stone Age – Superquarry Prehistory 4. Landscape Quality Guardians – the advent of the LQG 5. Views from Harris – Work versus Wilderness 6. 83 Days of Advocacy – the LQG takes Counsel 7. 83 Days of Advocacy – Voices from Harris 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Services Monitoring Group Minutes
    Greater Glasgow Acute Hospital Services Strategy: South Glasgow Monitoring Group 1430hrs, Friday 6th June 2003, Library, Floor E Conference Room, Victoria Infirmary Present: Peter Mullen (Chair) Pat Bryson, Convenor, Greater Glasgow Health Council Dr Harry Burns, Greater Glasgow NHS Board Margaret Hinds, Chair, Health Service Forum South-East Janis Hughes MSP Ken MacIntosh MSP Jane McCready, Staff Side Chair, Local Partnership Forum Dr Ken O’Neill, Local Health Care Co-operative Dr David Ritchie, Chair, Victoria Infirmary Medical Staff Association Ann Simpson, Chairperson, Friends of the Victoria Infirmary Dr Yvonne Taylor, Area Medical Committee In Attendance: Louise Laing, Secretary, Health Service Forum South-East Jim Whyteside, Greater Glasgow NHS Board (acting as Secretary in place of John Hamilton) 1 Welcome and Introduction Peter Mullen welcomed everyone to the first independent meeting of the South Glasgow Monitoring Group. 2 Minute of 28th March Joint North and South Glasgow Monitoring Groups Meeting The minute was approved subject to the following correction: Page 11, paragraph two, third sentence to read as ‘In Greater Glasgow the Board had done its best to overcome many problems in taking forward the Acute Hospital Services strategy.’ 3 Matters Arising – Remit Peter said that the changes made to the remit at the previous meeting had been reviewed and incorporated into enclosure 5a. He was anxious to maintain the group’s independence and now presumed that the line of reporting went to the new Deputy Minister for Health and Community Care, Mr Tom McCabe. Peter was also anxious that the formal minute of meetings would be placed in the public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Wednesday 6 February 2002 (Afternoon) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 6 February 2002 Debates Col. TIME FOR REFLECTION .................................................................................................................................... 6061 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU MOTION .................................................................................................................. 6063 Motion moved—[Euan Robson]—and agreed to. POINTS OF ORDER .......................................................................................................................................... 6064 COMMUNITY CARE AND HEALTH (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 3 ........................................................................... 6066 COMMUNITY CARE AND HEALTH (SCOTLAND) BILL .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Msps by Party: Session 1
    MSP BY PARTY SESSION 1 Scottish Parliament This Fact sheet provides a list of all MSPs who served during Session 1, 6 May 1999 – 31 March 2003, arranged by party. Fact sheet The MSPs are listed in alphabetical order, by the party that they were elected to represent, with the party with most MSPs listed first. MSPs: Historical Statistical information about the number of MSPs in each party Series throughout session 1 can be found on the State of the Parties: Session 1 fact sheet. 9 January 2008 1 Scottish Labour Party Name Constituency / Region Wendy Alexander Paisley North Jackie Baillie Dumbarton Scott Barrie Dunfermline West Sarah Boyack Edinburgh Central Rhona Brankin Midlothian Bill Butler1 Glasgow Anniesland Malcolm Chisholm Edinburgh North and Leith Cathie Craigie Cumbernauld and Kilsyth Margaret Curran Glasgow Baillieston Susan Deacon Edinburgh East and Musselburgh Donald Dewar2 Glasgow Anniesland Helen Eadie Dunfermline East Patricia Ferguson Glasgow Maryhill Brian Fitzpatrick3 Strathkelvin and Bearsden Sam Galbraith4 Strathkelvin and Bearsden Karen Gillon Clydesdale Trish Godman West Renfrewshire Rhoda Grant Highlands and Islands Iain Gray Edinburgh Pentlands Hugh Henry Paisley South John Home Robertson East Lothian Janis Hughes Glasgow Rutherglen Gordon Jackson Glasgow Govan Sylvia Jackson Stirling Cathy Jamieson Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley Margaret Jamieson Kilmarnock and Loudoun Andy Kerr East Kilbride Johann Lamont Glasgow Polllok Marilyn Livingstone Kirkcaldy 1 Bill Butler was elected in the Glasgow Anniesland by-election on 23 November 2000. He replaced Donald Dewar 2 Donald Dewar died on 11 October 2000. He was replaced by Bill Butler 3 Brian Fitzpatrick was elected in the Strathkelvin and Bearsden by-election on 7 June 2001.
    [Show full text]