DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Report to Be Forwarded to Them Should Give Notice at the Document Supply Centre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Report to Be Forwarded to Them Should Give Notice at the Document Supply Centre PROCEDURES COMMITTEE Tuesday 5 October 1999 (Morning) £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 1999. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 5 October 1999 Col. EMERGENCY BUSINESS .......................................................................................................................... 107 PRIORITY ISSUES ................................................................................................................................... 109 FIRST MEETINGS ................................................................................................................................... 137 TOPICAL QUESTIONS.............................................................................................................................. 138 CONVENERS LIAISON GROUP .................................................................................................................. 138 MID-WEEK ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................ 138 PROCEDURES COMMITTEE 5th Meeting CONVENER : *Mr Murray Tosh (South of Scotland) (Con) COMMI TTEE MEMBERS: *Donald Gorrie (Central Scotland) (LD) *Janis Hughes (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab) *Gordon Jac kson (Glasgow Govan) (Lab) *Mr Andy Kerr (East Kilbride) (Lab) *Mr Gil Paterson (Central Scotland) (SNP) *Michael Russell (South of Scotland) (SNP) *attended THE FOLLOWING MEMBER ALSO ATTENDED: Iain Smith (Deputy Minister for Parliament) COMMI TTEE CLERK: John Patterson SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK: William Venters ASSISTANT CLERK: Jim Johnston 107 5 OCTOBER 1999 108 Scottish Parliament together, and have a paper from the clerks on the range of issues surrounding urgent and topical questions, emergency motions and ministerial Procedures Committee statements? The Convener: That is a fair suggestion. From Tuesday 5 October 1999 time to time, matters arise that are of pressing interest, but the Parliament does not respond to (Morning) them timeously. That can be because the matter does not arise on an Opposition day or because [THE CONVENER opened the meeting at 09:30] the Opposition does not want to raise it, or because it is not part of the Executive’s business. The Convener (Mr Murray Tosh): During our We do not seem to have the opportunity to discuss fifth meeting, we will have to take decisions on a issues as they arise. Perhaps the clerks could variety of proposed changes to the standing consider all those points together. orders. The thrust of the evidence that we heard at our previous meeting was that we should adopt a Michael Russell: Could that go on our list of minimalist approach—let the thing run and see priority issues? As the Presiding Officer says, that how it works. I therefore suggest that today we area is creating some difficulty for him. should attempt to identify issues that are genuine The Convener: The problem with accepting it problems and set in motion the necessary as a priority issue, and considering changes to the changes to the standing orders, but that on other standing orders, is fitting all that into our timetable, issues we should simply apply a touch to the tiller. because we are on the point of making some In one or two cases, I might suggest that we changes on other matters. merely offer opinions to the Presiding Officer. From some of the announcements that he has This is a big issue, on which all the political made in the chamber recently, it seems that he is groups would be best advised to reflect. We receptive to taking guidance from the committee. should give the Executive the opportunity to consider the problem and to give its own analysis. That is how I would like the meeting to proceed, Although I agree that the issue is important, I do although what we do on any of the specific agenda not think that we should try to bounce in, because items is entirely up to the committee. it is late in the process. However, we are in the process of firefighting some of the little bits and Emergency Business pieces that have come up in the past few months and we are considering making more substantial The Convener: Let us move to agenda item 1. changes to the standing orders by May. Many I have received a letter from Margo MacDonald. recent problems could be resolved by practice, I do not want to go into specifics but, essentially, rather than by trying to write standing orders for Margo has asked that we look at the way in which every eventuality. That is why I have always been announcements are made in Parliament and the reluctant to be over-prescriptive in the standing way in which questions and motions revolve round orders—there will always be new circumstances. ministerial statements. That is an area of some Michael Russell: I do not like to disagree with concern. Iain Smith, who is here today, was part of you, because we have been running on a brief discussion last week in the chamber about consensus. However, rule 13.8 is very important to the concordats. the Parliament. Emergency questions are likely to The committee, the Executive and the arise from time to time; they will certainly arise Parliamentary Bureau might have to look at the between now and next May. If the Presiding issue over time. The way in which to do that is to Officer himself writes to the Procedures move cautiously and to ask for a report from the Committee to say that the rule is not adequate or clerks; we should also engage in discussions on a sufficient, and if he uses the word “vital” in his broader front, to see whether we can all agree on letter, we should treat the matter with some the correct practice. urgency and put it on our list of priorities. If we do not do so, we will run into the problem again, Michael Russell (South of Scotland) (SNP): perhaps several times before next May. When the That ties in with agenda item 4, which is a letter opportunity exists, we should try to do something from the Presiding Officer that arose out of the about it. request last week for a statement and the fact that there was no procedure allowing the Presiding I am not suggesting that we should try to steer Officer to accept the request. The words the Presiding Officer to interpret rule 13.8 in a way “sufficiently urgent” are in rule 13.8 of the standing that would overcome the difficulty—that would not orders, but those words can be interpreted in be enough. However, something needs to be different ways. Can we bring the two issues done. 109 5 OCTOBER 1999 110 The Convener: I do not especially disagree with Executive that it is not reasonable to haul the suggestion that we should look quickly at the ministers in on every Thursday morning, or on point raised by the Presiding Officer; and Margo Wednesday mornings if we have meetings on MacDonald raises an important issue. I added a Wednesday mornings. We have also had a plea third angle. Mike added a second angle by from some members who have said that combining Sir David Steel’s point with Margo’s occasionally morning debates have lost a bit of point. Looking at the big picture will be a longer- their fizz because the matter was not decided by a term project. If you wanted a quick response to Sir full chamber, as it could and should have been. David’s point, we would have to do that while the The example that springs to mind is the debate on bigger picture was the subject of further the Holyrood building, the drama of which was investigations. sacrificed by not moving to a vote immediately. Michael Russell: I am happy to accept that. If The clerks say that it is up to the Presiding we agree that we need to take urgent action on Sir Officer to decide, on a debate-by -debate basis, David Steel’s letter, a paper from the clerks on whether there should be a vote after the debate, or both issues would be helpful. However, at the next whether to stick rigidly to 5 o’clock. I am sure that meeting, we should separate the two issues again in the vast majority of cases it will be appropriate and start to act. to have decision time at 5 o’clock; but from time to time a debate timetabled for a morning might well The Convener: For the next meeting, I will ask command considerable interest and be likely to be the clerks to produce a paper on those points, fully attended, and for such a debate it would be which will allow us to act on Sir David’s letter. appropriate to have an immediate vote. With John Patterson (Committee Clerk): We can hindsight, that might have been a better way to cope with that. handle the Holyrood debate—as a result, the issue might not have been identified as a priority. The Convener: Is the committee content to commission such a report? If we choose that option, we will not have to change the standing orders—we will simply have Members indicated agreement. to draw the matter to Sir David Steel’s attention. I Priority Issues see nodding heads—does everyone think that that is the best way to proceed? The Convener: We have a number of decisions Donald Gorrie (Central Scotland) (LD): As to take, based on paper PR/99/5/2 on priority long as the notice given is adequate. issues. The intention is to take those decisions The Convener: That is a critical point. today; at the next meeting, we will review the changes required to the standing orders. Mr Andy Kerr (East Kilbride) (Lab): Does the Depending on how quickly we can do the work, we text of that option make it clear that having a vote might require to use the meeting after that as well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 2002
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Scotland Quarterly Report November 2002 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Contents 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 4 2. The Scottish Parliament Mark Shephard 7 3. The Media Philip Schlesinger 11 4. Public Attitudes and identity John Curtice 14 5. Scotland/UK Relations Alex Wright 18 6. Scotland/International Relations Alex Wright 22 7. Relations with Local Government Neil McGarvey 27 9. Legal Disputes Barry Winetrobe 31 10. Political parties James Mitchell 32 11. Public policies Barry Winetrobe 34 2 Key points: James Mitchell — First Minister Jack McConnell became embroiled in an embarrassing internal constituency row over local party funds; — Culture Minister Mike Watson broke collective cabinet responsibility by speaking out—but not voting—against Executive health policy fearing that he might lose votes in the forthcoming Scottish elections; — Herald newspaper went up for sale with the prospect that it will be bought by owners of Scotsman rivals. 3 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 1.1 Collective responsibility The application of the doctrine of collective responsibility has been under the spotlight in the Glasgow hospitals issue. The Culture Minister, Mike Watson, has been a leading public opponent of the reorganisation plan, but voted with the Executive in a debate on the issue on 12 September. His MPA, Janis Hughes, put herself in an even more unusual position, by abstaining on the Executive amendment to the critical SNP motion, but then voting for the as-amended motion. The First Minister refused to sack either, on the basis that they had both adhered to collective responsibility by their votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Services Monitoring Group Minutes
    Greater Glasgow Acute Hospital Services Strategy: South Glasgow Monitoring Group 1430hrs, Friday 6th June 2003, Library, Floor E Conference Room, Victoria Infirmary Present: Peter Mullen (Chair) Pat Bryson, Convenor, Greater Glasgow Health Council Dr Harry Burns, Greater Glasgow NHS Board Margaret Hinds, Chair, Health Service Forum South-East Janis Hughes MSP Ken MacIntosh MSP Jane McCready, Staff Side Chair, Local Partnership Forum Dr Ken O’Neill, Local Health Care Co-operative Dr David Ritchie, Chair, Victoria Infirmary Medical Staff Association Ann Simpson, Chairperson, Friends of the Victoria Infirmary Dr Yvonne Taylor, Area Medical Committee In Attendance: Louise Laing, Secretary, Health Service Forum South-East Jim Whyteside, Greater Glasgow NHS Board (acting as Secretary in place of John Hamilton) 1 Welcome and Introduction Peter Mullen welcomed everyone to the first independent meeting of the South Glasgow Monitoring Group. 2 Minute of 28th March Joint North and South Glasgow Monitoring Groups Meeting The minute was approved subject to the following correction: Page 11, paragraph two, third sentence to read as ‘In Greater Glasgow the Board had done its best to overcome many problems in taking forward the Acute Hospital Services strategy.’ 3 Matters Arising – Remit Peter said that the changes made to the remit at the previous meeting had been reviewed and incorporated into enclosure 5a. He was anxious to maintain the group’s independence and now presumed that the line of reporting went to the new Deputy Minister for Health and Community Care, Mr Tom McCabe. Peter was also anxious that the formal minute of meetings would be placed in the public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Wednesday 6 February 2002 (Afternoon) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 6 February 2002 Debates Col. TIME FOR REFLECTION .................................................................................................................................... 6061 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU MOTION .................................................................................................................. 6063 Motion moved—[Euan Robson]—and agreed to. POINTS OF ORDER .......................................................................................................................................... 6064 COMMUNITY CARE AND HEALTH (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 3 ........................................................................... 6066 COMMUNITY CARE AND HEALTH (SCOTLAND) BILL .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Msps by Party: Session 1
    MSP BY PARTY SESSION 1 Scottish Parliament This Fact sheet provides a list of all MSPs who served during Session 1, 6 May 1999 – 31 March 2003, arranged by party. Fact sheet The MSPs are listed in alphabetical order, by the party that they were elected to represent, with the party with most MSPs listed first. MSPs: Historical Statistical information about the number of MSPs in each party Series throughout session 1 can be found on the State of the Parties: Session 1 fact sheet. 9 January 2008 1 Scottish Labour Party Name Constituency / Region Wendy Alexander Paisley North Jackie Baillie Dumbarton Scott Barrie Dunfermline West Sarah Boyack Edinburgh Central Rhona Brankin Midlothian Bill Butler1 Glasgow Anniesland Malcolm Chisholm Edinburgh North and Leith Cathie Craigie Cumbernauld and Kilsyth Margaret Curran Glasgow Baillieston Susan Deacon Edinburgh East and Musselburgh Donald Dewar2 Glasgow Anniesland Helen Eadie Dunfermline East Patricia Ferguson Glasgow Maryhill Brian Fitzpatrick3 Strathkelvin and Bearsden Sam Galbraith4 Strathkelvin and Bearsden Karen Gillon Clydesdale Trish Godman West Renfrewshire Rhoda Grant Highlands and Islands Iain Gray Edinburgh Pentlands Hugh Henry Paisley South John Home Robertson East Lothian Janis Hughes Glasgow Rutherglen Gordon Jackson Glasgow Govan Sylvia Jackson Stirling Cathy Jamieson Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley Margaret Jamieson Kilmarnock and Loudoun Andy Kerr East Kilbride Johann Lamont Glasgow Polllok Marilyn Livingstone Kirkcaldy 1 Bill Butler was elected in the Glasgow Anniesland by-election on 23 November 2000. He replaced Donald Dewar 2 Donald Dewar died on 11 October 2000. He was replaced by Bill Butler 3 Brian Fitzpatrick was elected in the Strathkelvin and Bearsden by-election on 7 June 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Community Care Committee
    HEALTH AND COMMUNITY CARE COMMITTEE Wednesday 8 May 2002 (Morning) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 8 May 2002 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE .................................................................................................................................. 2643 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION.................................................................................................................. 2644 Food (Figs, Hazelnuts and Pistachios from Turkey) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/148).................................................................................................. 2644 Food (Peanuts from China) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/149)............ 2644 National Health Service (General Medical Services and Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/153) ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Making on Maternity Services
    EMBARGOED UNTIL MEETING Greater Glasgow NHS Board Board Meeting Tuesday 20th April 2004 Board Paper No. 2004/28 Chief Executive Director of Planning and Community Care Medical Director Modernising Maternity Services: Outcome of Consultation Recommendations: The Board endorses the following recommendations based on the proposals we put to public consultation, but amended and extended to reflect the outcome of that consultation: 1. Delivery services should be located in the new facilities at the Princess Royal Maternity Hospital and high quality provision at the Southern General Hospital - the Queen Mother’s Hospital should close as soon as physical capacity is available and the necessary planning can ensure a safe transition for all the services it provides. This is likely to be around 12 to 14 months from a ministerial decision. 2. In the context of the abolition of Trusts, the move to single system working and the need to look at appropriate organisational arrangements across NHS Greater Glasgow during spring and summer of 2004, the Corporate Management Team should develop an appraisal of a single structure to manage maternity and paediatric services across Greater Glasgow. 3. The report of the Maternity Planning Group should form the basis of a change implementation plan to ensure that the quality of specialist paediatric services is not compromised. 4. Community services should be strengthened and extended by the provision of a maternity centre in West Glasgow providing an extended range of services, redeployment of midwives into community services and the implementation of public health midwifery, as proposed by the Maternity Services Liaison Committee. 5. Both delivery units should provide midwifery delivery beds aimed at low risk women.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report, They Are: Scottish Statutory Instruments 2004/90, 93 to 98, 101 to 103, 106, National Health Service (Optical Charges 114 to 116, 122, 132 and 133
    HEALTH COMMITTEE Tuesday 20 April 2004 (Afternoon) Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2004. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 20 April 2004 Col. ITEMS IN PRIVATE .................................................................................................................................. 705 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION.................................................................................................................... 709 Food for Particular Nutritional Uses (Addition of Substances for Specific Nutritional Purposes) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2004 (SSI 2004/90) .................................................................. 709 Regulation of Care (Fees) (Scotland) Order 2004 (SSI 2004/93) .......................................................... 709 Regulation of Care (Requirements as to Care Services) (Scotland) Order 2004 (SSI 2004/94) ............... 709 Regulation of Care
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Direct Elections to National Health Service Boards (Scotland) Bill
    Direct Elections to National Health Service Boards (Scotland) Bill Consultation Document 1 Foreword My proposal for the Direct Elections to National Health Service Boards (Scotland) Bill was lodged in the Scottish Parliament on 8th May 2003. Since I was first elected I have been contacted by constituents who have expressed to me their concerns about changes made to the provision of local health services. Time and again I have heard from people who feel frustrated and angry about decisions made by NHS Boards which they perceive to be completely against the views of the local community. I know that these feelings are felt in communities across Scotland when changes are proposed to local health services. This document sets out in detail this proposal and why I think it is so important that members of the public are allowed directly to elect members of NHS Boards. I want to hear as many views as possible on the underlying principle of the Bill and the electoral system that would enable the public directly to elect National Health Service Board members. All comments submitted during this consultation process will be considered prior to the Bill being lodged in the Scottish Parliament. Thank you for your interest in the proposed Direct Elections to National Health Service Boards (Scotland) Bill. I hope that you will submit your opinions as part of this consultation process. Bill Butler MSP June 2004 2 What is the ‘Direct Elections to National Health Service Boards (Scotland) Bill'? The proposal, brought by Bill Butler, MSP for Glasgow Anniesland, will, if enacted, require direct elections, by members of the public, to the majority of places on National Health Service Boards in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Community Care Committee
    HEALTH AND COMMUNITY CARE COMMITTEE Wednesday 26 September 2001 (Morning) Session 1 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2001. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Wednesday 26 September 2001 Col. CONTACTS ......................................................................................................................................... 2001 HEALTH AND COMMUNITY CARE COMMITTEE 21st Meeting 2001, Session 1 CONVENER *Mrs Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD) DEPU TY CONVENER Margaret Jamieson (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) (Lab) COMMI TTEE MEMBERS Dorothy-Grace Elder (Glasgow ) (SNP) *Janis Hughes (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab) Mr John McAllion (Dundee East) (Lab) *Shona Robison (North-East Scotland) (SNP) Mary Scanlon (Highlands and Islands) (Con) *Dr Richard Simpson (Ochil) (Lab) *Nicola Sturgeon (Glasgow ) (SNP) *attended CLERK TO THE COMMITTE E Jennifer Smart SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Peter McGrath ASSISTANT CLERK Joanna Hardy LOC ATION Committee Room 3 2001 26 SEPTEMBER 2001 2002 Scottish Parliament We have a range of options. We could note the letter, suggest to Mrs Smith that she might like to pursue it as a petition or write to the Executive to Health and Community Care ask whether it has any plans to improve services Committee for befrienders.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    LIST OF ALL MSPS A-Z: SESSION 2 Scottish Parliament The Fact sheet provides an alphabetical list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the second Fact sheet parliamentary session, 7 May 2003 – 2 April 2007. It also lists the party for which each MSP was elected as well as the constituency or region that they represented. MSPs: Historical The abbreviation (C) has been used to indicate a constituency seat Series and (R) to indicate a regional seat. 12 March 2009 1 MSP Party Constituency or Region Brian Adam Scottish National Party Aberdeen North (C) Bill Aitken Conservative Glasgow (R) Wendy Alexander Labour Paisley North (C) Andrew Arbuckle1 Liberal Democrat Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Jackie Baillie Labour Dumbarton (C) Shiona Baird Green North East Scotland (R) Richard Baker Labour North East Scotland (R) Chris Ballance Green South of Scotland (R) Mark Ballard Green Lothians (R) Scott Barrie Labour Dunfermline West (C) Sarah Boyack Labour Edinburgh Central (C) Rhona Brankin Labour Midlothian (C) Ted Brocklebank Conservative Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Robert Brown Liberal Democrat Glasgow (R) Derek Brownlee2 Conservative South of Scotland (R) Bill Butler Labour Glasgow Anniesland (C) Rosemary Byrne3 Scottish Socialist Party South of Scotland (R) Dennis Canavan Independent Falkirk West (C) Malcolm Chisholm Labour Edinburgh North and Leith (C) Cathie Craigie Labour Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (C) Bruce Crawford Scottish National Party Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Roseanna Cunningham Scottish National Party Perth (C) Frances Curran Scottish Socialist Party West of Scotland (R) Margaret Curran Labour Glasgow Baillieston (C) David Davidson Conservative North East Scotland (R) Susan Deacon Labour Edinburgh East and Mussleburgh (C) James Douglas-Hamilton Conservative Lothians (R) Helen Eadie Labour Dunfermline East (C) Fergus Ewing Scottish National Party Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber (C) 1 Andrew Arbuckle became the regional member for Mid Scotland and Fife on 10 January 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Rural Development Committee
    ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Wednesday 1 June 2005 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2005. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Wednesday 1 June 2005 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE .................................................................................................................................. 1945 EUROPEAN ISSUES .............................................................................................................................. 1947 ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 16th Meeting 2005, Session 2 CONVENER *Sarah Boyack (Edinburgh Central) (Lab) DEPU TY CONVENER *Mr Mark Ruskell (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green) COMMI TTEE MEMBERS *Rob Gibson (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) Karen Gillon (Clydesdale) (Lab) *Alex Johnstone (North East Scotland) (Con) *Richard Lochhead (North East Scotland) (SNP) *Maureen Mac millan (Highlands and Islands) (Lab) *Mr Alasdair Morrison (Western Isles) (Lab) *Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD) COMMI TTEE SUBSTITU TES Alex Fergusson (Gallow ay and Upper Nithsdale) (Con) Janis Hughes (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab) Jim Mather (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) Jeremy Purvis (Tw eeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale) (LD) Eleanor Scott (Highlands and Islands) (Green) *attended CLERK TO THE COMMITTE E Mark Brough SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Katherine Wright ASSISTANT CLERK Christine Lambourne LOC ATION Committee Room 4 1945 1 JUNE 2005 1946 Scottish Parliament The Convener: It will be the first Sewel motion that we have dealt with. As we have not dealt with one before, I wanted to check out what the Environment and Rural process would be.
    [Show full text]