DOCSLIB.ORG

The Battle for Roineabhal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Battle for Roineabhal The Battle for Roineabhal Reflections on the successful campaign to prevent a superquarry at Lingerabay, Isle of Harris, and lessons for the Scottish planning system © Chris Tyler The Battle for Roineabhal: Reflections on the successful campaign to prevent a superquarry at Lingerabay, Isle of Harris and lessons for the Scottish planning system Researched and written by Michael Scott OBE and Dr Sarah Johnson on behalf of the LINK Quarry Group, led by Friends of the Earth Scotland, Ramblers’ Association Scotland, RSPB Scotland, and rural Scotland © Scottish Environment LINK Published by Scottish Environment LINK, February 2006 Further copies available at £25 (including p&p) from: Scottish Environment LINK, 2 Grosvenor House, Shore Road, PERTH PH2 7EQ, UK Tel 00 44 (0)1738 630804 Available as a PDF from www.scotlink.org Acknowledgements: Chris Tyler, of Arnisort in Skye for the cartoon series Hugh Womersley, Glasgow, for photos of Sound of Harris & Roineabhal Pat and Angus Macdonald for cover view (aerial) of Roineabhal Turnbull Jeffrey Partnership for photomontage of proposed superquarry Alastair McIntosh for most other photos (some of which are courtesy of Lafarge Aggregates) LINK is a Scottish charity under Scottish Charity No SC000296 and a Scottish Company limited by guarantee and without a share capital under Company No SC250899 The Battle for Roineabhal Page 2 of 144 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Lingerabay Facts & Figures: An Overview 3. The Stone Age – Superquarry Prehistory 4. Landscape Quality Guardians – the advent of the LQG 5. Views from Harris – Work versus Wilderness 6. 83 Days of Advocacy – the LQG takes Counsel 7. 83 Days of Advocacy – Voices from Harris 8. 83 Days of Advocacy – Last Rites 9. Views from Harris – Snakes in the Grassroots 10. Delays and Politicking 11. Views from Harris – A Long Goodbye 12. The Second Bite of the Cherry 13. The Strange Case of Lafarge and the Panda 14. The Last Dance 15. Learning Lessons – Messages from Lingerabay 16. ‘The Top of Roineabhal is Coming Back’ – Harris after Lingerabay. Appendix 1: Summary Timeline Appendix 2: The Cast of Characters Appendix 3: Personal Statements from the Authors Appendix 4: The Public Local Inquiry (PLI) Process Appendix 5: List of Acronyms used in this Report. The Battle for Roineabhal Page 3 of 144 Chapter 1: Introduction A tortuous tale The saga of the Lingerabay superquarry is a tortuous tale of almost epic proportions, lasting for more than a quarter of a century. It concerns a proposal – first mooted in 1974 – for a 10 million tonne superquarry that would chisel away almost a third of the magnificent mountain of Roineabhal on the Isle of Harris in the Western Isles of Scotland. The planning application by Redland Aggregates brought into focus major issues of national policy on mineral supply, rural support, community empowerment, sustainability, landscape protection and biodiversity. In the latter stages, even issues of European legislation were raised. This volume is not intended as a definitive history of the battle to stop the superquarry at Lingerabay. Rather, it is the perspective of one particular player in the ‘Battle for Roineabhal’: Scottish Environment LINK, a consortium of 19 environmental, non-governmental organisations in Scotland. At the start of this story, the organisation was called Scottish Wildlife & Countryside Link, but it changed its name in 1999 to reflect its wider remit, and for convenience it is referred to in the text by its preferred abbreviation: LINK. In many ways, LINK’s involvement in Lingerabay marks its ‘coming of age’ as an effective environmental network. Through the professionalism of its engagement, it gained respect and influence, and today its views are taken seriously by Scottish Ministers in a way that was unthinkable back in 1991 when LINK entered this particular fray. Yet the members of LINK who were at the forefront of its involvement in Lingerabay recognise that many mistakes were made, especially in the early stages of the campaign. This report tries to describe some of these also, in the hope that others in future will learn from them. Over the span of this story, Scotland has changed immensely, so much so that some of the murkier details in the early stages of the saga seem almost unthinkable today. Yet there are lessons from what has transpired since 1974 that remain just as relevant in the first decade of the 21st century. Already some of the key individuals involved admit that they cannot remember all the labyrinthine detail of what went on. This report, therefore, is an attempt to capture for posterity some of the story that lay behind the public debate, and more importantly, to draw out some of the lessons for environmental and community groups who might face a similar ‘David and Goliath’ battle over Britain’s finest landscapes in the future. Insights and hindsight It is important to record here what this report sets out to do. As authors, we were invited by LINK to write an overview of the campaign to prevent a superquarry at Lingerabay, in a way that is “readable and accessible to a lay audience, although technically correct”. We were asked to interview some of the key participants, then, with the benefit of their insights, to suggest the lessons for environmental NGOs and community groups, to propose the next steps for key players, and to consider the policy implications for LINK and its partners. The Battle for Roineabhal Page 4 of 144 The report deliberately focuses on the experiences of LINK and this is reflected in our choice of interviewees, although many interviewees were able to offer insights from other perspectives, including that of Scottish Natural Heritage and various development and political agencies. Some interviewees felt that it was prudent to speak ‘off the record’, and this has been respected. The points of view of various individuals who aided and interacted with LINK, particularly those in the Harris community, are also given. A full list of those consulted, together with brief professional biographies, forms Appendix 2 of this report. Although LINK members are rightly proud of the way they challenged the Lingerabay proposal, they would never claim that they alone ‘saved’ Roineabhal. One important factor in their success was that, by bringing key issues to the fore, they helped to change local opinion, initially enthusiastic, against the planned superquarry. The implications of changing local attitudes are explored in the following chapters, in parallel with the story of LINK’s efforts. In line with our brief, we do not devote much attention to the developer’s perspective and, as such, Lafarge Redland remains a rather shadowy presence in this tale. That said, we attempt to illuminate the errors the company made in its handling of the Lingerabay case, at least as perceived by LINK, and to record the events that led to Lafarge’s final withdrawal. It is important to make clear that this report is not intended as a definitive and impartial guide to the arguments for and against a superquarry on Harris. As authors, both of us would admit to being partisan: we both played a part in the battle against the superquarry, and we were specifically commissioned to write this report so we could draw on that experience. Inevitably, this means we bring prejudices to the report, and our personal statements in Appendix 3 will help readers to understand our backgrounds in telling this tale. The case against the superquarry Although this is not a detailed account of the pros and cons of the superquarry proposal, it will be necessary to refer to some, at least, of the arguments in telling this story. Chapter 2 summarises the key statistics about the proposed superquarry, and the sheer scale alone is one major reason why so many LINK member bodies objected to the planning application. More information about LINK’s planning objections is to be found in the excellent LINK Quarry Group booklet, The Case Against the Harris Superquarry, published in 1996, from which Table 1 below is drawn summarising the LINK case. The booklet is still available on-line at www.foe- scotland.org.uk/nation/superquarry1.html The Battle for Roineabhal Page 5 of 144 TABLE 1: The 21 planning reasons presented by the Link Quarry Group in support of its objection to the proposed superquarry at Lingerabay. 1. The proposal is contrary to the Government's sustainable development strategy. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Government's international responsibility for protected areas. 3. The proposal is contrary to Government policy as set out in NPPG4 Land for Mineral Working. 4. The proposal is contrary to the underlying reasons and objectives for the designation of National Scenic Areas (NSAs). 5. The development would adversely affect five other NSAs. 6. Valuable plant habitat would be lost. 7. There would be disturbance to Schedule 1 breeding birds. 8. The proposal is contrary to the objectives of the development plan. 9. Noise from the development would cause disturbance to local people and visitors. 10. Blasting would cause similar loss of amenity. 11. Dust would also cause loss of amenity, and damage to wildlife and fisheries. 12. The material and cultural asset of St Clements Church, Rodel would be devalued, and possibly damaged by vibration. 13. The development would increase the risk of marine pollution from accidental emissions from the site or associated shipping, or from ballast water. 14. Associated shipping would interfere with fisheries in the area. 15. The development would damage the image of Harris. 16. The development would cause economic dependency on a single company/single industry development. 17. The development would compromise future job prospects. 18. The development could damage the cultural heritage of the area, in terms of the Gaelic language and the Hebridean way of life.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inner and Outer Hebrides Hiking Adventure
    Dun Ara, Isle of Mull Inner and Outer Hebrides hiking adventure Visiting some great ancient and medieval sites This trip takes us along Scotland’s west coast from the Isle of 9 Mull in the south, along the western edge of highland Scotland Lewis to the Isle of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides (Western Isles), 8 STORNOWAY sometimes along the mainland coast, but more often across beautiful and fascinating islands. This is the perfect opportunity Harris to explore all that the western Highlands and Islands of Scotland have to offer: prehistoric stone circles, burial cairns, and settlements, Gaelic culture; and remarkable wildlife—all 7 amidst dramatic land- and seascapes. Most of the tour will be off the well-beaten tourist trail through 6 some of Scotland’s most magnificent scenery. We will hike on seven islands. Sculpted by the sea, these islands have long and Skye varied coastlines, with high cliffs, sea lochs or fjords, sandy and rocky bays, caves and arches - always something new to draw 5 INVERNESSyou on around the next corner. Highlights • Tobermory, Mull; • Boat trip to and walks on the Isles of Staffa, with its basalt columns, MALLAIG and Iona with a visit to Iona Abbey; 4 • The sandy beaches on the Isle of Harris; • Boat trip and hike to Loch Coruisk on Skye; • Walk to the tidal island of Oronsay; 2 • Visit to the Standing Stones of Calanish on Lewis. 10 Staffa • Butt of Lewis hike. 3 Mull 2 1 Iona OBAN Kintyre Islay GLASGOW EDINBURGH 1. Glasgow - Isle of Mull 6. Talisker distillery, Oronsay, Iona Abbey 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue
    Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 £2.00 Comment Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 t is difficult to maintain constitutional Ineutrality at this tail-end of 2013. Of course we will continue to do our best to keep the SLR open as a space for Contents anyone on the Scottish left, a place where they can feel at home and contribute Comment .......................................................2 to a debate that stretches beyond the boundaries of party or constitutional Democracy in writing ....................................4 position. That is our duty as a magazine Jean Urquhart created expressly for that purpose. Solid foundations for change .........................6 But the duty lies not only on us to Michael Keating keep that space open but on all sides to fill that space. Because it can surely not Our share of the future ..................................8 be possible for us to face the desolation Robin McAlpine which lies across Scottish society in the dog-days of this unlucky year without Graveyard or get-together ..........................10 some sort of answer to what lies all Isobel Lindsay around us. Welfare Nation State ...................................12 What answer to Grangemouth? John McInally Facile talk of ‘the need to work together’ is an insult to the collective intelligence. Labour and the trade unions .......................14 All it states is that if we keep the fork Gregor Gall, Richard Leonard, Bob Crow and let others keep the knife, it will be impossible for us to eat on our own. That Real energy answers ...................................18 may not be a bad thing, but someone Andy Cumbers needs to explain why.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2002
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Scotland Quarterly Report November 2002 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Contents 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 4 2. The Scottish Parliament Mark Shephard 7 3. The Media Philip Schlesinger 11 4. Public Attitudes and identity John Curtice 14 5. Scotland/UK Relations Alex Wright 18 6. Scotland/International Relations Alex Wright 22 7. Relations with Local Government Neil McGarvey 27 9. Legal Disputes Barry Winetrobe 31 10. Political parties James Mitchell 32 11. Public policies Barry Winetrobe 34 2 Key points: James Mitchell — First Minister Jack McConnell became embroiled in an embarrassing internal constituency row over local party funds; — Culture Minister Mike Watson broke collective cabinet responsibility by speaking out—but not voting—against Executive health policy fearing that he might lose votes in the forthcoming Scottish elections; — Herald newspaper went up for sale with the prospect that it will be bought by owners of Scotsman rivals. 3 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 1.1 Collective responsibility The application of the doctrine of collective responsibility has been under the spotlight in the Glasgow hospitals issue. The Culture Minister, Mike Watson, has been a leading public opponent of the reorganisation plan, but voted with the Executive in a debate on the issue on 12 September. His MPA, Janis Hughes, put herself in an even more unusual position, by abstaining on the Executive amendment to the critical SNP motion, but then voting for the as-amended motion. The First Minister refused to sack either, on the basis that they had both adhered to collective responsibility by their votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Diets, Changing Minds: How Food Affects Mental Well Being and Behaviour Acknowledgements
    Changing Diets, Changing Minds: how food affects mental well being and behaviour Acknowledgements This report was written by Courtney Van de Weyer, and edited by Jeanette Longfield from Sustain, Iain Ryrie and Deborah Cornah from the Mental Health Foundation* and Kath Dalmeny from the Food Commission. We would like to thank the following for their assistance throughout the production of this report, from its conception to its review: Matthew Adams (Good Gardeners Association), Nigel Baker (National Union of Teachers), Michelle Berridale-Johnson (Foods Matter), Sally Bunday (Hyperactive Children's Support Group), Martin Caraher (Centre for Food Policy, City University), Michael Crawford (Institute of Brain Chemistry and Human Nutrition, London Metropolitan University), Helen Crawley (Caroline Walker Trust), Amanda Geary (Food and Mood), Bernard Gesch (Natural Justice), Maddy Halliday (formerly of the Mental Health Foundation), Joseph Hibbeln (National Institutes of Health, USA), Malcolm Hooper (Autism Research Unit, University of Sunderland), Tim Lang (Centre for Food Policy, City University), Tracey Maher (Young Minds Magazine), Erik Millstone (Social Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex), Kate Neil (Centre for Nutrition Education), Malcolm Peet (Consultant Psychiatrist, Doncaster and South Humber Healthcare NHS Trust), Alex Richardson (University of Oxford, Food and Behaviour Research), Linda Seymour (Mentality), Andrew Whitley (The Village Bakery) and Kate Williams (Chief Dietician, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust). We would also like to thank the Mental Health Foundation and the Tudor Trust for providing funding for the production of this report. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily the views of those acknowledged or of Sustain's membership, individually or collectively.
    [Show full text]
  • © Patricia M`Cafferty, May 2004. Abstract
    PATRICIA MCCAFFERTY WORKING THE 'THIRD WAY': NEW LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS, AND SCOTTISH DEVOLUTION THESIS PRESENTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW MAY 2004 © PATRICIA M`CAFFERTY, MAY 2004. ABSTRACT Labour's election victory in 1997 was heralded as a new era, the dawn of a Third Way, a novel attempt to chart a unique political course overcoming the perceivedlimitations of both New Right and Old Labour. In this thesis I explore the era of New Labour generally and, in particular, the impact of the Third Way on working lives. Key to my analysis is New Labour's attempt to synthesise oppositional interests,in particular those of capital and labour. This involves a crucial rhetoric of flexibility, competitivenessand partnership. My research explores the rhetoric of New Labour in relation to the reality of this new force in power. It does this by: " drawing out key features in the development of New Labour, especially its relation to Old Labour; " examining central elementsof New Labour ideology; " arguing that Scotland should be seen as central to the transition from Old to New :Labour; " utilising a case study of industrial relations developments in a major electronics factory in the West of Scotland and, to a lesser extent, key developmentsin public sector employment. My main finding is that where New Labour's ideology promisespositive benefits, the form of its implementation has negative impacts for workers. Since I take New Labour as a process, my thesis concludes with a more speculative exploration of possible future developments,both in relations to New Labour's role in them, and their possible impact on the New Labour project.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Handling OS Open Map – Local Data
    OS OPEN MAP LOCAL Getting started guide Handling OS Open Map – Local Data 1 Handling OS Open Map – Local Data Loading OS Open Map – Local 1.1 Introduction RASTER QGIS From the end of October 2016, OS Open Map Local will be available as both a raster version and a vector version as previously. This getting started guide ArcGIS ArcMap Desktop illustrates how to load both raster and vector versions of the product into several GI applications. MapInfo Professional CadCorp Map Modeller 1.2 Downloaded data VECTOR OS OpenMap-Local raster data can be downloaded from the OS OpenData web site in GeoTIFF format. This format does not require the use of QGIS geo-referencing files in the loading process. The data will be available in 100km2 grid zip files, aligned to National Grid letters. Loading and Displaying Shapefiles OS OpenMap-Local vector data can be downloaded from the OS OpenData web site in either ESRI Shapefile format or in .GML format version 3.2.1. It is Merging the Shapefiles available as 100km2 tiles which are aligned to the 100km national gird letters, for example, TQ. The data can also be downloaded as a national set in ESRI Removing Duplicate Features shapefile format only. The data will not be available for supply on hard media as in the case of some other OS OpenData products. from Merged Data Loading and Dispalying GML • ESRI shapefile supply. ArcGIS ArcMap Desktop The data is supplied in a .zip archive containing a parent folder with two sub folders entitled DATA and DOC. All of the component shapefiles are contained within the DATA folder.
    [Show full text]
  • EVENTS SECTION ONE - Page 2 08/08/19 - 04/09/19
    001 ')&* $2* 3%,*43 25 ++,- M/%,M% M !"#$ Ury) '$ &$( (Ah) '$ &#&#" %"&!!'! E> > NH Ņ - - 5 ! " 6789:;:<,= 12;>/#1:'78?:< ?:21;,;.8:8:?2';,72678 A 5 + ; * B BANGLA SPICE Photograph by Sandie MacIver www.sandiephotos.com !"#$% ! &#$% '() ! *+,() -.#$% / $#$% +,() ! () 0 ' * * + , - + .-- !"# %& !7ryyShq Carnival sunshine &"%#% Turn to Section Four centre pages Portmeirion, Sara Miller / + *0 # !9" and Wrendale in stock *+ ! #;# # #;# Formerly SignPrint 1*1 1/, - 2 -+3 * 5 Design ( ( ! )*!+,! -+./+0-1232 PRINT uvp hp 4 5( 6 6 Publish ISTANBUL G KEBABS CURRIES FISH ‘n’ CHIPS BURGERS PIZZAS 70 5743 RESTAURANT & TAKEAWAY [email protected] FAMILY FRIENDLY RESTAURANT [email protected] WITH OVER 30 YEARS SERVING THE ISLAND #"##SOMETHING FOR#$ EVERYONE%&%#'(( 22 Francis Street OPEN 7 DAYS Stornoway •# Insurance Services RMk Isle of Lewis Tues-Thursday 12pm-2.30pm 4.30-10.30pm Friday-Saturday: 12pm-3pm 4pm till late HS1 2NB •# Risk Management "7$Sunday: 12pm till#89#! late (open all day Sunday) ADVICE 24 South Beach Street, Stornoway, Isle of Lewis t: 01851 704949 # • Health & Safety YOU CAN Tel: 01851 700299 www.rmkgroup.co.uk TRUST EVENTS SECTION ONE - Page 2 www.hebevents.com 08/08/19 - 04/09/19 9: 61;6 A postcard from history! A :6<BCD ;E ;<6:9=F=<6:9= !"#$%"#&'(&') By Roz Macaskill postcard which went missing 59 years ago fi nally reached A its destination last week. The postcard was sent in 1960 from Inverness by Lilly Campbell butt was lost in transit before fi nally making its way to Nellie Mackenzie. Nellie says: “My maiden name was Nellie Gillies and we livedd at 1 Bells Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Spatial Developments at Ordnance Survey
    Oracle Spatial Developments at Ordnance Survey Ed Parsons Chief Technology Officer Who is Ordnance Survey ? Great Britain's national mapping agency An information provider... • Creates & updates a national database of geographical information • £ 50m ($90m) investment by 2007 in ongoing improvements • National positioning services • Advisor to UK Government on Geographical Information • Highly skilled specialised staff of 1500 The modern Ordnance Survey • Ordnance Survey is solely funded through the licensing of information products and services • Unrivalled infrastructure to maintain accuracy, !" ! currency and delivery of geographic information • 2003-4 Profit of £ 6.6m on a turnover of £116m($196m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
    [Show full text]
  • Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide
    Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide 2 Introduction Scotland is surrounded by coastal water – the North Sea, the Irish Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, there are also numerous bodies of inland water including rivers, burns and about 25,000 lochs. Being safe around water should therefore be a key priority. However, the management of water safety is a major concern for Scotland. Recent research has found a mixed picture of water safety in Scotland with little uniformity or consistency across the country.1 In response to this research, it was suggested that a framework for a water safety policy be made available to local authorities. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) has therefore created this document to assist in the management of water safety. In order to support this document, RoSPA consulted with a number of UK local authorities and organisations to discuss policy and water safety management. Each council was asked questions around their own area’s priorities, objectives and policies. Any policy specific to water safety was then examined and analysed in order to help create a framework based on current practice. It is anticipated that this framework can be localised to each local authority in Scotland which will help provide a strategic and consistent national approach which takes account of geographical areas and issues. Water Safety Policy in Scotland— A Guide 3 Section A: The Problem Table 1: Overall Fatalities 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 Data from National Water Safety Forum, WAID database, July 14 In recent years the number of drownings in Scotland has remained generally constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth As a Whole and Geographic Coordinates
    NAME:____________________________________________________________ 1 GO THERE—MYSTERIES OF LOCH NESS, SCOTLAND Use FLY TO and enter Loch Ness, Scotland as the destination. The view will settle in at about 15 miles EYE ALTITUDE, centered about midshore on the northeast coast of the Loch. Note how the cursor (cross-hairs) is labeled Loch Ness, United Kingdom in the VIEW WINDOW. Describe the shape and orientation of Loch Ness based on this view in the box below. Does the shape of the Loch remind you of other bodies of land-based bodies of surface water, and if so what kind? Based on this observation and comparison, describe whether or not the water in the lake is predominantly stationary or rapidly flowing, and give reasons for your arguments in the box below. Without using the ZOOM feature, use the HAND CURSOR and sweep across the lake and along its axis and to determine the average elevation of the lake. Remember that Google Earth® uses an averaging mechanism of regularly spaced coordinates to generate elevations, and that the apparent elevation of the lake is affected by elevations along its shoreline. Record and interpret your findings below. Go to the LAYERS WINDOW, and make sure that the WATER BODIES LAYER is checked in the folder of Geographic Features. In the box below, what do you suppose, based on the other labeled water bodies in the area, the word Loch means? Turn off the WATER BODIES LAYER. The outlines of the WATER BODIES LAYER does not directly overlie the images used as the base for GOOGLE EARTH® in the VIEW WINDOW.
    [Show full text]
  • David Horrobin
    A CEO LOOKS AT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY David Horrobin I usually ask medical people why they went into medicine, but in your case it’s more appropriate to ask why you left it? Mainly because I was interested in too many things. I didn’t want to get railroaded down a particular speciality. I felt that from a position in clinical physiology, I could do lots and lots of clinical projects. So I stayed in basic science but have primarily spent my life doing clinically oriented work. Physiology in Oxford involved what? I did a year working with Geoffrey Harris. He was the person who first demonstrated the pituitary is controlled by the hypothalamus. And that really I suppose in many ways shaped what I was interested in from then on – how does the brain control the hormonal system? I did clinical medicine but I’d worked as a flying doctor when I was a medical student in Kenya, and was so fascinated by Kenya that I wanted to go back. So when a new medical school there was looking for a clinical physiologist to start their physiology programme, I went out and worked for four years in the medical school. The odd event that really shaped the future, and that directed me down a psychiatric as opposed to other routes happened there. A physiologist called Howard Burn from Berkeley, California, a real superstar in the field of prolactin research, came out, funded by the US embassy, to give a lecture. The way these things used to work – the US Embassy had no idea who he was supposed to be lecturing to or anything, it was a sort of cultural thing, so I got a call from the US Ambassador saying “I’ve got this hotshot from the University of California can you find an audience for him?” It was the middle of the vacation so the only people around were a zoology professor called Mohamed ?? and myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Selection Document: Summary of the Scientific Case for Site Selection
    West Coast of the Outer Hebrides Proposed Special Protection Area (pSPA) No. UK9020319 SPA Site Selection Document: Summary of the scientific case for site selection Document version control Version and Amendments made and author Issued to date and date Version 1 Formal advice submitted to Marine Scotland on Marine draft SPA. Scotland Nigel Buxton & Greg Mudge 10/07/14 Version 2 Updated to reflect change in site status from draft Marine to proposed in preparation for possible formal Scotland consultation. 30/06/15 Shona Glen, Tim Walsh & Emma Philip Version 3 Updated with minor amendments to address Marine comments from Marine Scotland Science in Scotland preparation for the SPA stakeholder workshop. 23/02/16 Emma Philip Version 4 Revised format, using West Coast of Outer MPA Hebrides as a template, to address comments Project received at the SPA stakeholder workshop. Steering Emma Philip Group 07/04/16 Version 5 Text updated to reflect proposed level of detail for Marine final versions. Scotland Emma Philip 18/04/16 Version 6 Document updated to address requirements of Greg revised format agreed by Marine Scotland. Mudge Glen Tyler & Emma Philip 19/06/16 Version 7 Quality assured Emma Greg Mudge Philip 20/6/16 Version 8 Final draft for approval Andrew Emma Philip Bachell 22/06/16 Version 9 Final version for submission to Marine Scotland Marine Scotland 24/06/16 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Site summary ..................................................................................................... 2 3. Bird survey information .................................................................................... 5 4. Assessment against the UK SPA Selection Guidelines ................................. 7 5. Site status and boundary ................................................................................ 13 6. Information on qualifying species .................................................................
    [Show full text]