From Martin Buber’S Iand Thou to Mikhail Bakhtin’Sconcept of ‘Polyphony’ 21

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Martin Buber’S Iand Thou to Mikhail Bakhtin’Sconcept of ‘Polyphony’ 21 Dialogue as a Trans-disciplinary Concept Studia Judaica Forschungen zur Wissenschaft des Judentums Begründet von Ernst Ludwig Ehrlich Herausgegeben von Günter Stemberger, Charlotte Fonrobert und Alexander Samely Band 83 Dialogue as a Trans-disciplinary Concept Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue and its Contemporary Reception Edited by Paul Mendes-Flohr DE GRUYTER An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-037915-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-040222-3 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-040237-7 ISSN 0585-5306 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com TableofContents Paul Mendes-Flohr Introduction: Dialogue as aTrans-DisciplinaryConcept 1 Jürgen Habermas APhilosophy of Dialogue 7 Julia Matveev From Martin Buber’s Iand Thou to Mikhail Bakhtin’sConcept of ‘Polyphony’ 21 Jeffrey AndrewBarash Politics and Theology: The Debate on Zionism between Hermann Cohen and Martin Buber 49 Samuel Hayim Brody Is Theopolitics an Antipolitics? Martin Buber,Anarchism, and the Ideaofthe Political 61 Ran HaCohen Bubers schöpferischer Dialog mit einer chassidischen Legende 89 Irene Kajon Religio Today: The Concept of Religion in Martin Buber’sThought 101 Karl-Josef Kuschel Martin Buber und das Christentum 113 Yoram Bilu Dialogic Anthropology 141 Andreas Kraft Jüdische Identität im Liminalen und das dialogische Prinzip bei Martin Buber 157 VI TableofContents HenryAbramovitch The Influence of Martin Buber’sPhilosophy of Dialogue on Psychotherapy: His Lasting Contribution 169 Alan J. Flashman Almost Buber: Martin Buber’sComplex Influence on Family Therapy 183 Aleida Assmann Dialogic Memory 199 Contributors 215 Subject index 217 Paul Mendes-Flohr Introduction: Dialogue as a Trans-DisciplinaryConcept In amoment of disarming candor,Buber explainedtoafriend who was seeking to promotehis appointment to the faculty of the Hebrew University: “Ichbin kein Universitätsmensch”–Iamnot auniversity person.¹ By this confession, written just before he left Germanyfor Eretz Yisrael in March 1938, Buber meant that he did not fit into – nor did he care to fit into the disciplinary classifications of the university.His appointment to the facultytothe Hebrew University of Jerusalem was delayedbymanyyears, primarilybecause those advocating his appoint- ment– such as Gershom Scholem and even the president of the fledglinguniver- sity,Judah Leon Magnes – could not convince their colleagues that Buber was indeedaUniverstätsmensch. WasBuber aphilosopher?Tobesure, he wroteextensively on philosophical themes, but his mode of exposition did not quite conform to the accepted disqui- sitional protocol of academicpublications. Washeascholarofcomparative re- ligion (Religionswissenschaft), which he taught as a Honorarprofessor or adjunct professor at the University of Frankfurt? Washeabiblical scholar? After all he translated (initiallywith Franz Rosenzweig) the Hebrew Scriptures into German, wroteinnumerable essays and (by1938) no less thanfour major books on bib- lical subjects?Was he ascholarofHasidism and mysticism?Orperhaps he was an arthistorian, having also written about art?Hewas of course all these, yetnot quite any. He lacked aclear disciplinary profile. Finally, after ten years of negotiations acompromise was reached and he was granted apro- fessorship in social philosophy, which soon evolvedinto the foundingchair of the Hebrew University’sdepartment of sociology.² Although Buber had studied sociologyand social philosophywith the likes of GeorgSimmel and Wilhelm Dilthey,and edited ahighlyacclaimedseries of forty monographs in social psy- chology, Die Gesellschaft,one would hardlyregardhim in the strict sense aso- ciologist. Buber to S. H. Bergmann, letterdated 16 April 1936.Buber, Briefwechsel aus sieben Jahr- zehnten, ed. Grete Schaeder(Heidelberg: VerlagLambertScheidner,1973), vol2:589. On the complex trajectory of Buber’sacademic career,see my article “Buber’sRhetoric,” in: Martin Buber:AContemporaryPerspective,ed. Paul Mendes-Flohr (Jerusalem: The Israel AcademyofSciences and Humanities/Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2002), 1–24. 2 Paul Mendes-Flohr In aword, he wasapolymathofexceptionallearning, afacttowhich his friend Franz Rosenzweig attested in aletterexplainingwhy he had invited Buber to join thefaculty of the FreiesJüdisches Lehrhaus in Frankfurt am Main: Iwould nothaveinvited him … hadInot been utterlyconvinced from theveryfirst mo- ment of hisabsolutegenuineness,tobeexact,the integritythathas slowly takenhold of him. … Idonot knowofanyoneelse whoisashonest as he is withrespect to spiritual andintellectualmatters, andasdependableinhuman affairs. Idonot readilyemploy superlatives….[YetImust acknowledge that]Buber is for me an imposing savant (Ge- lehrter). Iamnot easily impressedbyknowledge,becauseImyselfhavesome. … But in comparisontoBuber’slearning,Iregard myself adwarf (Gegen Bubers Gelehrsamkeit aber emfinde ich mich als einen Zwerg.). In thecourseofmyconversationswithhim,every time Iseektosay somethingnew,Iencounter acommandingerudition – withoutatrace of pretentiousness – not only in Germanand foreignliterature ‘about,’ butalsointhe primarywritings of individuals whosenames Ihardlyknow. That Iamalsoimpressed by his Judaic andHebrew knowledgesaysless, although in recent years Ihavedeveloped acertain sense andlearned to distinguish betweena‘little’ anda‘great’ [knowledge in Jewishmatters]. Thereare areasofJudaica in whichheiscertainly in thestrictest senseof thetermanexpert(FachmaNN).³ Buber’sreading wasnot only voraciousbut catholic,coveringencyclopedicin- terestsinthe human andsocialsciences, theartsand literature. Theenormous breadthofhis intellectual universe is alsoregisteredinthe catalogue of his personal library of over 40,000 volumesand from thethematic scopeofhis writings. Buber’sinterdisciplinary horizons arealso reflectedinthe criticaled- itionofhis writings that arecurrentlyinpreparation initiallyunder the joint sponsorshipofthe Berlin-Brandenburg AcademyofSciences, andsince 2009 withHeinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf,and TheIsrael AcademyofSci- encesand theHumanities,will comprise some 21 volumes, some containing twobooks,and each volume dedicatedtoaspecifictheme.For example: Myth andMysticism Hasidism Psychology andPsychotherapy PhilosophicalAnthropology Chinese Philosophyand Literature Pedagogy Philosophy of Religion Philosophy of Language Messianismand Eschatology RosenzweigtoEugen Meyer,letterdated 23 January 1923,inRosenzweig.Der Mensch und sein Werk:Gesammelte Schriften,Part 1: Briefe und Tagebücher,ed. Rachel Rosenzweigand Edith Rosenzweig-Scheinmann, II: 883. Introduction: Dialogue as aTrans-DisciplinaryConcept 3 Judaism Christianity Zionism PoliticalPhilosophy Social andCultural Theory TheoriesofTranslation Theaterand Literature Art Criticism andArt History Indeed, Buber’sinterests were trans-disciplinary.What ultimatelycharacterizes hisworkinthese multifarious fields is theprinciple of dialogue,which he em- ployed as acomprehensive hermeneutic method. As an interpretivemethod,dialogue hastwo distinct butultimately conver- gentvectors.The firstisdirectedtothe subject of one’s “investigation”:one is to listen to thevoice of theother andtosuspend allpre-determinedcategories andconcepts that onemay have of the other; dialogue is,first and foremost, the art of unmediatedlistening. In asense Buber’sprinciple of dialogue ex- tendsIsaac Newton’smaxim: Hypothesesnon fingo: Ifeign no hypotheses. Dia- logue is,ofcourse,morethanamethod ensuring maximum objectivity; dia- logue hasmanifestcognitive andthus existentialsignificance.Bylistening to theOther attentively,byallowing thevoice of the Other to penetrate, so to speak, one’sverybeing, to allowthe wordsofthe Other – articulatedacous- tically and viscerally – to question one’spre-establishedpositionsfortifiedby professional, emotional, intellectual andideological commitments,one must perforce be opentothe possibilityofbeingchallenged by that voice. As Eugen Rosenstock-Heussy putit: Respondo etsimutabor, Irespond, although Iwillbechanged; “Irespond,even though Imay change in the process!” Gen- uine dialogue thusentails arisk, the ‘danger’ that by trulylisteningtothe other – be the otheranindividual, atext, aworkofart – thatone might, indeed, be changed, transformedcognitively andexistentially. On amoreprosaic butnolesssignificantlevel,Buber envisioned dialogue as ascholarlyconversation conductedbetween various disciplinary perspec- tives.Inhis studyofthe originsofthe biblicalconceptionofMessianism, Kö- nigtumGottes,henot onlydrewupon the canon of biblical scholarship,dem- onstratingamasteryoftextual skills finelyhoned by exhaustive philological analysis(grounded in anuanced knowledgeofancient
Recommended publications
  • The Existentialism of Martin Buber and Implications for Education
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-4919 KINER, Edward David, 1939- THE EXISTENTIALISM OF MARTIN BUBER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATION. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1968 Education, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE EXISTENTIALISM OF MARTIN BUBER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Edward David Kiner, B.A., M.A. ####*### The Ohio State University 1968 Approved by Adviser College of Education This thesis is dedicated to significant others, to warm, vital, concerned people Who have meant much to me and have helped me achieve my self, To people whose lives and beings have manifested "glimpses" of the Eternal Thou, To my wife, Sharyn, and my children, Seth and Debra. VITA February 14* 1939 Born - Cleveland, Ohio 1961......... B.A. Western Reserve University April, 1965..... M.A. Hebrew Union College Jewish Institute of Religion June, 1965...... Ordained a Rabbi 1965-1968........ Assistant Rabbi, Temple Israel, Columbus, Ohio 1967-1968...... Director of Religious Education, Columbus, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Philosophy of Education Studies in Philosophy of Education, Dr. Everett J. Kircher Studies in Curriculum, Dr. Alexander Frazier Studies in Philosophy, Dr. Marvin Fox ill TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION............................................. ii VITA ................................................... iii INTRODUCTION............................ 1 Chapter I. AN INTRODUCTION TO MARTIN BUBER'S THOUGHT....... 6 Philosophical Anthropology I And Thou Martin Buber and Hasidism Buber and Existentialism Conclusion II. EPISTEMOLOGY . 30 Truth Past and Present I-It Knowledge Thinking Philosophy I-Thou Knowledge Complemented by I-It Living Truth Buber as an Ebdstentialist-Intuitionist Implications for Education A Major Problem Education, Inclusion, and the Problem of Criterion Conclusion III.
    [Show full text]
  • TALMUDIC FORGERIES a CASE STUDY in ANTI-JEWISH PROPAGANDA by BEN ZION BOKSER HROUGHOUT History, the Talmud Has Been a Main Targe
    TALMUDIC FORGERIES A CASE STUDY IN ANTI-JEWISH PROPAGANDA By BEN ZION BOKSER HROUGHOUT history, the Talmud has been a main target of the attacks by enemies of Judaism. The recent rise in Nazi-inspired propaganda, accordingly, brought with it a recrudescence of the accusations made against this store- house of Jewish lore. The falsification of Talmudic texts and the distortion of their teachings are spread with increased vigor throughout the English-speaking world. The fact that these libels have been exposed repeatedly by the testimony of Jewish as well as Christian scholars has not deterred present day purveyors of these slanders from at- tempting to portray the Talmud as the fountainhead of an inferior and unethical morality. It may seem incredible to the average person that the Jewish religion, mother of all monotheistic religions of justice and mercy, should need de- fense against such accusations. But this study is less a defense and refutation than an analysis of the way these propagandists work, and the combination of unscrupulous distortion and crudity which characterizes their attack. It is also an ex- posure of the real motives for which these attacks are only an opening wedge. WHAT THE TALMUD IS The Talmud is a record of opinions and discussions on all phases of law and life culled from the utterances of those out- standing Jewish teachers who functioned in the academies of Palestine and Babylonia during the first five centuries of the 1939 TALMUDIC FORGERIES 7 common era. The earliest layer of the Talmud is the Mish- nah, a product of Palestinian scholarship and written in a clear, lucid Hebrew.
    [Show full text]
  • The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 by Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011
    Special CWIHP Research Report The Victims at the Berlin Wall, 1961-1989 By Hans-Hermann Hertle/Maria Nooke August 2011 Forty-four years after the Berlin Wall was built and 15 years after the East German archives were opened, reliable data on the number of people killed at the Wall were still lacking. Depending on the sources, purpose, and date of the studies, the figures varied between 78 (Central Registry of State Judicial Administrations in Salzgitter), 86 (Berlin Public Prosecution Service), 92 (Berlin Police President), 122 (Central Investigation Office for Government and Unification Criminality), and more than 200 deaths (Working Group 13 August). The names of many of the victims, their biographies and the circumstances in which they died were widely unknown.1 This special CWIHP report summarizes the findings of a research project by the Center for Research on Contemporary History Potsdam and the Berlin Wall Memorial Site and Documentation Center which sought to establish the number and identities of the individuals who died at the Berlin Wall between 1961 and 1989 and to document their lives and deaths through historical and biographical research.2 Definition In order to provide reliable figures, the project had to begin by developing clear criteria and a definition of what individuals are to be considered victims at the Berlin Wall. We regard the “provable causal and spatial connection of a death with an attempted escape or a direct or indirect cause or lack of action by the ‘border organs’ in the border territory” as the critical factor. In simpler terms: the criteria are either an attempted escape or a temporal and spatial link between the death and the border regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpersonal Relationships by Rabbi Sheryl Katzman and Galya Greenberg 4
    CM SourceBook Covers May 2014 Alt:CM cover 8/5/14 10:03 AM Page 8 SOURCEBOOK FOR COMMUNITY LEARNING: JANUARY Interpersonal Relationships by Rabbi Sheryl Katzman and Galya Greenberg 4 www.chaimitzvah.org 4–Interpersonal Relationships: Family & Friends INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS i introduction This story, reprinted from the bookWhen All You’ve Ever Wanted Isn’t Enough, serves as a foundation to begin thinking about the intimate, personal relationships in our lives. text א I was sitting on a beach one summer day, watching two children, a boy and a girl, playing in the sand. They were hard at work building an elaborate sand castle by the water’s edge, with gates and towers and moats and internal passages. Just when they had nearly finished their project, a big wave came along and knocked it down, reducing it to a heap of wet sand. I expected the children to burst into tears, devastated by what had happened to all their hard work. But they surprised me. Instead, they ran up the shore away from the water, laughing and holding hands, and sat down to build another castle. I realized that they had taught me an important lesson. All the things in our lives, all the complicated structures we spend so much time and energy creating, are built on sand. Only our relationships to other people endure. Sooner or later, the wave will come along and knock down what we have worked so hard to build up. When that happens, only the person who has somebody’s hand to hold will be able to laugh.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundations of Martin Buber's Authenticity
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 1974 Wirklichkeit and Verantwortung: The Foundations of Martin Buber's Authenticity James Patrick Glasson University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Glasson, James Patrick, "Wirklichkeit and Verantwortung: The Foundations of Martin Buber's Authenticity" (1974). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 1537. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/1537 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WIRKLlg RKEI T AND YEfl ANTWORTUNGi i:£1HF: FOUNDATIONS OF rv1.:.a..R rfI N BUBER'S AUTHENTICI TY BY .,TAMES PA1fRICK GLASSON A THESIS SUBMIT'rED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTEROF ARTS IN PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITYOF RHODEISLA ND 1974 THESIS ABSTRACT This study will investigate the foundations cf Ma-rtin ­ Buber's authenticity. 1l1he problem of the foundations of authenticity arises in Jean-Paul Sartre who makes contra­ dictory claims when he says on the one hand there are no objective ethical values while on the other says "we ought to be authentic". The questions are 1 , Can authenticity be separated from objective values and still impose an obliga­ tion? And what are the foundations for saying "we ought to be authentic"? In the first section Buber's notion of Wirklich keit · (actuality) is examined and will be shown. to provide some legitimate foundation for authenticity oy implying an obliga.tion in reference to what man "ought to be".
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Atwood 2017
    Emcke 2016 Kermani 2015 Lanier 2014 Margaret Atwood 2017 Alexijewitsch 2013 Liao 2012 Sansal 2011 Grossman 2010 Magris 2009 Kiefer 2008 Friedländer 2007 Lepenies 2006 Pamuk 2005 Esterházy 2004 Sontag 2003 Conferment speeches Achebe 2002 Habermas 2001 Peace Prize of the German Book Trade 2017 Djebar 2000 Sunday, October 15, 2017 Stern 1999 Walser 1998 Kemal 1997 Vargas Llosa 1996 Schimmel 1995 Semprún 1994 Schorlemmer 1993 Oz 1992 Konrád 1991 Dedecius 1990 Havel 1989 Lenz 1988 Jonas 1987 Bartoszewski 1986 Kollek 1985 Paz 1984 The spoken word prevails. Sperber 1983 Kennan 1982 Kopelew 1981 Cardenal 1980 Menuhin 1979 Lindgren 1978 Kołakowski 1977 Frisch 1976 Grosser 1975 Frère Roger 1974 The Club of Rome 1973 Korczak 1972 Dönhoff 1971 Myrdal 1970 Mitscherlich 1969 Senghor 1968 Bloch 1967 Bea/Visser 't Hooft 1966 Sachs 1965 Marcel 1964 Weizsäcker 1963 Hinweis: Die ausschließlichen Rechte für die Reden liegen bei den Autoren. Tillich 1962 Radhakrishnan 1961 Die Nutzung der Texte ist ohne ausdrückliche Lizenz nicht gestattet, sofern Gollancz 1960 nicht gesetzliche Bestimmungen eine Nutzung ausnahmsweise erlauben. Heuss 1959 Jaspers 1958 Wilder 1957 Schneider 1956 Hesse 1955 Burckhardt 1954 Buber 1953 Guardini 1952 Schweitzer 1951 Tau 1950 Friedenspreis des Deutschen Buchhandels 2017 Peter Feldmann Lord Mayor of the City of Frankfurt Greeting On behalf of the City of Frankfurt, I would like what I can say with confidence is that I and many to welcome you to the presentation of this year’s other readers know that your books have changed Peace Prize of the German Book Trade to Margaret our world. Among many other things, you have Atwood.
    [Show full text]
  • Andamios 361 Pablo Beytía* El Profesor Dr. Hans Joas Es
    CREATIVIDAD SITUADA, CONTINGENCIA Y MODERNIDAD. ENTREVISTA A HANS JOAS Pablo Beytía* El Profesor Dr. Hans Joas es sociólogo y filósofo social. Trabaja como miembro permanente del Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS) y como miembro asociado del Max-Weber-Kolleg de la Universidad de Erfurt, Alemania. Es profesor de Sociología e integrante del Committee on Social Thought en la Universidad de Chicago. También es miembro titular de la Berlin-Branderburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften y participante no residente del Swedisch Collegium for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences. Fue investigador del Instituto Max Planck de Berlín, del Indiana Institute for Advanced Study y del Wissenschaftskolleg de Berlín. Ha sido profesor de sociología en la universidad Erlangen- Nürnberg (1987-1990), en la Freie Universität Berlin (1990-2002) y en el Max-Weber-Kolleg de cultura e investigación social, instituto que dirigió entre los años 2002 y 2011. Ha sido profesor visitante en diversas universidades, como la de Tübingen (1980-1981), Chicago (1985), Toronto (1986), Uppsala (1994), Wisconsin Madison (1996), New School for Social Research (1997), Duke (1998) y Viena (2002 y 2007). También fue vicepresidente de la Asociación Internacional de Sociología (ISA). En 2010 recibió el Premio de Ciencias de la Universidad de Bielefeld, y en 2012, tanto la medalla Werner Heisenberg de la Fundación Alexander Humboldt, como el título Doctor Honoris Causa por la Universidad de Tübingen. INTRODUCCIÓN A LA OBRA DE HANS JOAS Presentar un esbozo actualizado de la obra de Hans Joas es una tarea tan honrosa como difícil de emprender, que en el mejor de los casos puede * Magíster en Sociología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • THE THEOLOGICAL ]OURNAL Or EMANUEL UMVERSITY OT ORADEA
    Perichoresis THE THEOLOGICAL ]OURNAL or EMANUEL UMVERSITY OTORADEA VOLI.JME5 ISSUE1 2007 EMANI.JELI.JNIYERSTry PUBLISHING HOUSE BOARD OF EDITORS Prof. Dr. PAL'I,NEGRUT, The Rector of Emanuel University (Systematic Theology) Dr. Manrus D. CnucrRU, Editor-in-Chief (Patristics and Classical Languages) Dr. Dr. CoRNELT C. Sn4LT' Asst. Editor-in-Chief (Reformation Studies, Historical and Dognatic Theology) Dr. oer.ie. Bolce, Theological Editor (Old and New Testament Studies) EDITORIAL AD\'ISORS Prof. Dr. DIHC. JAMESMCMAHoN, Albert E[is Institute (APPlied Theology) hof. Dr, FRANKA. JAMFGIn, Reformed Theological Seminary (Reformation Studies) Prof. Dr. HAMILToN MooRE, tish Baptist College, Queerls University of Belfasi (BiblicalTheology) Asst. Prof, Dr. STEvENSvmr, Southwesterri-Biptist Theological Seminary (flomiletics and Pastoral Theology) MANAGING EDITOR Dr. D!. CoRNELT C. Sn.{u,r The theoloqical researchof Emanuel University is developed mairrly by The Faculty .,i fn"oto.i attd the Brian CriIfiths School of Management The researchactivity of tfr" i"*if,i.f fn"of"gy is carried out by the following departments: The Seminar of ftr"oloeicit Res"utci, The Cenhe foi Reformation studjes, The Centre for Mis- .ioi"aiJ st"ai"", fn" centre for Pastoral counselling, and the Billy Graham Chair of Evangelism, Peicharesists Dublished twice a year at the end of each acadernic semestre (March utti S.ot"-#t) by The Faculty of Theology and The Brian Griffitfu School of Vun"gL*"nt itt.otperation wiih colleagues and contributors from abroad Thus' the idias expressed in various articles may not rePresent the formal dogmatic confession ofEmaruel University and they should be acknowledged as such' For permission to reproduce information fuonPerichotesis, pleasewrite to the Boari of Editors at U'niversitatea Emanuel din Oradea/Emanuel University of OraJea, Facultatea de Teologie/The Faculty of Theology,St Nuflrului Nr' 8Z 410597Oradea, Bihor, Romfia/Romania, or to the Managing Editor at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Fruitman
    Creating Heart Stephen fruitman Creating a New Heart Marcus Ehrenpreis on Jewry and Judaism Akademisk avhandling med tillstånd av rektorsämbetet vid Umeå universitet för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen offentligen försvaras i Humanisthuset, hörsal E fredagen den 12 oktober 2001, klockan 09.15 av Stephen Fruitman <*3 V Stephen Fruitman: Creating a New Heart: Marcus Ehrenpreis on Jewry and Judaism English text Department of Historical Studies, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden Monograph 2001. 252 pages Idéhistoriska skrifter nr 35 ISBN: 91-7305-111-X ISSN: 0282-7646 Abstract This dissertation represents the first attempt to take account of the entire Swedish œuvre of Marcus Ehrenpreis and view it as a single, coherent statement, recognizing the very fundamental confrontation taking place between tradi­ tional and modern ways of viewing reality and its possible resolution. A reading of his work reveals that the one constant in his life in letters was the struggle to reconcile the apparent logical antithesis of universalism and particu­ larism, which this dissertation sees as one with resonance for all ethnic minorities. In the Chapter One, a general orientation in the modern Jewish world is provided, including the traditional worlds of Orthodoxy and Hasidism into which he was born; the trend toward the political emancipation of the Jews in Western and Central Europe and the subsequent waves of assimilation among young Jews; the exacerbation of antisemitic tendencies in both Eastern and Western Europe; the emergence of Jewish
    [Show full text]
  • Luise Haus',Intro
    Introduction The Haushofers And The Nazis Luise Haushofer’s Jail Journal follows on from Albrecht Haushofer’s Moabite Sonnets, a bilingual edition of which appeared in 2001 with an introduction about the Haushofers, Geopolitics and the Second World War. Luise (née Renner) was Albrecht’s sister-in-law. After Moabite Sonnets appeared, her daughter—Andrea Haushofer-Schröder, Albrecht’s niece—contacted me and gave me some documents which illustrate the family consequences of Albrecht’s resistance activities. One of these was that Luise served time in jail as the Gestapo suspected her of helping Albrecht to elude capture after the 20th July 1944—a phrase which is shorthand for the attempt to assassinate Hitler and establish an alternative Government that would attempt to negotiate an end to the Second World War, and re-establish democracy in Germany. Because of the Nazi policy of Sippenhaft— arresting the family of an accused—Albrecht landed the Renner as well as the Haushofer families in trouble with the Gestapo and caused some dispute and ill- feeling between the two. The documents Andrea gave me appear here in the original German and in English translation. They comprise a communication from Martha Haushofer to Anna Renner; another from Karl Haushofer to Paul Renner; a reply from Renner; and a surviving fragment of a Jail Journal written by Luise Haushofer in 1963. In addition, there are several illustrations from the Haushofer archive (provided by Andrea). Albrecht was summarily executed in the closing hours of the War for his part in the Resistance to the Hitler regime. He had been captured in December 1944 and kept on ice in the Berlin Moabite Prison by the Nazis, in case his English contacts would be useful in the event of a negotiated end to the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham's Uncircumcised Children
    ABRAHAM’S UNCIRCUMCISED CHILDREN: THE ENOCHIC PRECEDENT FOR PAUL’S PARADOXICAL CLAIM IN GALATIANS 3:29 by Amy Genevive Dibley A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union in Near Easter Religions in the Graduate Division of the University of California at Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor LeAnn Snow Flesher, Chair Professor Daniel Boyarin Professor Eugene Eung-Chun Park Professor Yair Zakovitch Professor Erich S. Gruen Fall 2013 ABSTRACT Abraham’s Uncircumcised Children: The Enochic Precedent for Paul’s Paradoxical Claim in Galatians 3:29 by Amy Genevive Dibley Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union in Near Easter Religions in the Graduate Division University of California, Berkeley Professor LeAnn Snow Flesher, Chair This study proposes the Book of Dreams as the precedent for Paul’s program of gentile reclamation qua gentiles predating the composition of the Epistles by two centuries. 1 Dedication To my husband Peter, for whom the words loving and supportive and partnership hardly begin to encompass the richness of our journey together through this process. For our girls, Langsea and Lucia (5 and 4 years old as I submit this), who when playing “mommy” pause from dressing and feeding baby dolls to write their own dissertations. In thanks to the women of First Covenant Church in Rockford, Illinois and Kerry Staurseth (Langsea’s godmother) who watched those most precious to me so that this first child could at last be born, proving that it also takes a village to write a dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Enacting Cultural Identity : Time and Memory in 20Th-Century African-American Theater by Female Playwrights
    Enacting Cultural Identity: Time and Memory in 20th-Century African-American Theater by Female Playwrights Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades des Doktors der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt von Simone Friederike Paulun an der Geisteswissenschaftliche Sektion Fachbereich Literaturwissenschaft Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 13. Februar 2012 Referentin: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Aleida Assmann Referentin: PD Dr. Monika Reif-Hülser Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-269861 Acknowledgements 1 Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been possible without the guidance and support of several individuals who in one way or another contributed to the writing and completion of this study. It gives me a great pleasure to acknowledge the help of my supervisor Prof Dr. Aleida Assmann who has supported me throughout my thesis and whose knowledge, guidance, and encouragement undoubtedly highly benefited my project. I would also like to thank PD Dr. Monika Reif-Hülser for her sustained interest in my work. The feedback that I received from her and the other members of Prof. Assmann’s research colloquium was a very fruitful source of inspiration for my work. The seeds for this study were first planted by Prof. David Krasner’s course on African- American Theater, Drama, and Performance that I attended while I was an exchange student at Yale University, USA, in 2005/2006. I am immensely grateful to him for introducing me to this fascinating field of study and for sharing his expert knowledge when we met again in December 2010. A further semester of residence as a visiting scholar at the African American Department at Yale University in 2010 enabled me to receive invaluable advice from Prof.
    [Show full text]