DOCSLIB.ORG

Iraqi Army Seized Kirkuk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iraqi Army Seized Kirkuk ARMED CONFLICT RISK TRAVEL ADVISORY • 20 OCTOBER 2017 Iraqi Army Seized Kirkuk KEY POINTS • Iraqi forces seized Kirkuk and the surrounding area. • Thousands of civilians fled Kirkuk amid fears of sectarian violence and open warfare. • Limited fighting was reported as Kurdish forces withdrew. Vehicles from the Iraqi Army’s “Golden Division.” SITUATIONAL SUMMARY Armed Conflict: On 16 October 2017, the Iraqi Army commenced an operation to secure Kirkuk, supported by a number of irregular, pro-Iranian militia units. The two-pronged offensive was launched in a bid to retake the Kurdish held city and its associated infrastructure and oil fields. Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi ordered the Iraq army to impose security upon Kirkuk, in cooperation with the population of the city and the Kurdish Peshmerga forces, in the wake of a recent Kurdish referendum for independence from Iraq. The Iraqi government has reported that it has seized control of the city’s airport, in addition to the North Oil Company oil field and the strategic K1 military base. Iraqi forces also gained control over the Taza Khurmatu district in the southeast of the city. Iraqi forces briefly exchanged fire with Peshmerga troops on Taza at the Kirkuk intersection and Maryam Bag bridge. It is reported that a number of troops on both side were wounded in the exchange, however no precise figures have been released. At present, both sides report that the exchange of fire was due to a breakdown in communication, and Peshmerga forces have, otherwise. withdrawn peacefully ahead of the Iraqi advance. Contact: +44 ( 0 ) 1202 795 801 SOLACEGLOBAL.COM 1 of 3 ARMED CONFLICT RISK TRAVEL ADVISORY • 20 OCTOBER 2017 SOLACE GLOBAL COMMENT The effort to seize Kirkuk is the latest in a series of offensives seeking to regain lands that have been out of government control. Earlier offensives in Mosul and Tal Afar have been against the Islamic State group, with the Kurdish Peshmerga and Iraqi forces cooperating with each other and the US-led coalition. Despite the different change in opposition, all the recent Iraqi offensives are aligned in their intent to reunify Iraq into a discrete and stable political entity. Thousands of Kirkuk’s citizens fled the city as Iraqi forces and Iran-backed Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF) occupied areas surrounding Kirkuk as part of Iraq’s efforts to restrain the Kurdish region’s autonomy. The operation occurred in direct response to the 25 September referendum on Kurdish regional independence from Iraq. The central government declared the vote unconstitutional and, along with neighbouring Turkey and Iran, rejected the vote and imposed a blockade on the region. The US, a military supporter of both the Kurdish Autonomous Region and Iraq, also opposed the referendum and urged both sides to remain focused on the defeat of Islamic State. A large number of Kurdish citizens in Kirkuk are reluctant to remain in the city if it comes under the influence of Iran-supported Shia-militias, and many opted to withdraw along with the Peshmerga forces. This is likely to lead to persistent disruption throughout major urban areas in Kurdistan, particularly Erbil, as refugees seek shelter. The borders of the Kurdish Autonomous Region have been an ongoing source of conflict between Iraq and the Kurdish government. Kirkuk and the surrounding region remains constitutionally part of Iraq, however it was Kurdish Peshmerga forces which successfully secured the city against the advancing Islamic State, leading to the present disputed ownership. This tension has been further exacerbated as control of Kirkuk allows the exploitation of the surrounding oil fields, a key wealth generator for both factions. Additionally, both Turkey and Iran, key allies of Iraq, are unwilling to permit Iraqi Kurds greater independence for fear of inciting unrest in their own substantial Kurdish populations. This external pressure is likely to continue to drive the friction between the Kurdish region and the Iraqi Federal Government, regardless of whether the Kurds comply and fully surrender their claims on Kirkuk. The extent of the external pressure being applied to this dispute was effectively highlighted when a senior commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Al Quds force flew into Kirkuk to meet with Kurdish leaders immediately before the withdrawal of Peshmerga troops. The exact nature of the negotiations remains unclear. Although fighting has remained limited to this point, and the situation remains broadly peaceful, it is highly likely that protracted negotiations will lead to continued instability in the region. Protests in Erbil, Kirkuk, and Baghdad are likely in response to these events, and further armed clashes remains a realistic probability. Similarly, it is likely that the hand-over between federal and regional security forces will be contentious and marked by poor information sharing and non-cooperation. This may create a security vacuum in which there is a realistic probability that Islamic State cells could re-emerge in the region and conduct attacks, although it is highly unlikely that they will be able to exert territorial control as they did in 2014-2015. Contact: +44 ( 0 ) 1202 795 801 SOLACEGLOBAL.COM 2 of 3 ARMED CONFLICT RISK TRAVEL ADVISORY • 20 OCTOBER 2017 SECURITY ADVICE HIGH ARMED CONFLICT RISK Travellers and expatriates are advised to leave the region as a precaution. Travellers should be aware there is an increased security presence in Iraq, especially near Kirkuk and autonomous Kurdistan. If travelling within country, it is vital that travellers adhere fully to the instructions of security forces on either side; failure to comply may result in the use of lethal force. It is recommended that protests are avoided. It is likely police will use forceful measures against demonstrators given recent history and the possibility for a sectarian divide between security forces and the public. Political gatherings may initially seem peaceful but can escalate quickly into violence. Political developments often see a rise in attacks from terror groups. It would be advisable for travellers to maintain a low profile in the short-term and monitor local events. If currently in Kirkuk, it is recommended to contact the tour operator or airline for advice on rebooking return flights. Solace Global would advise clients to employ enhanced security measures when visiting Iraq – airport meet and greet and a security driver for the length of a visit should be minimum security precaution. Travellers to certain areas may also wish to employ executive protection and armoured vehicles. The use of a travel tracking system with an integrated intelligence feed would permit travellers to remain informed with changes to the situation, and permit employers to effectively implement duty of care for deployed personnel. Contact: +44 ( 0 ) 1202 795 801 SOLACEGLOBAL.COM 3 of 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Coming Turkish- Iranian Competition in Iraq
    UNITeD StateS INSTITUTe of Peace www.usip.org SPeCIAL RePoRT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPO R T Sean Kane This report reviews the growing competition between Turkey and Iran for influence in Iraq as the U.S. troop withdrawal proceeds. In doing so, it finds an alignment of interests between Baghdad, Ankara, and Washington, D.C., in a strong and stable Iraq fueled by increased hydrocarbon production. Where possible, the United States should therefore encourage The Coming Turkish- Turkish and Iraqi cooperation and economic integration as a key part of its post-2011 strategy for Iraq and the region. This analysis is based on the author’s experiences in Iraq and Iranian Competition reviews of Turkish and Iranian press and foreign policy writing. ABOUT THE AUTHO R in Iraq Sean Kane is the senior program officer for Iraq at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). He assists in managing the Institute’s Iraq program and field mission in Iraq and serves as the Institute’s primary expert on Iraq and U.S. policy in Iraq. Summary He previously worked for the United Nations Assistance Mission • The two rising powers in the Middle East—Turkey and Iran—are neighbors to Iraq, its for Iraq from 2006 to 2009. He has published on the subjects leading trading partners, and rapidly becoming the most influential external actors inside of Iraqi politics and natural resource negotiations. The author the country as the U.S. troop withdrawal proceeds. would like to thank all of those who commented on and provided feedback on the manuscript and is especially grateful • Although there is concern in Washington about bilateral cooperation between Turkey and to Elliot Hen-Tov for generously sharing his expertise on the Iran, their differing visions for the broader Middle East region are particularly evident in topics addressed in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security
    Order Code RL31339 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security Updated March 29, 2006 Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security Summary Operation Iraqi Freedom succeeded in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, but Iraq remains violent and unstable because of Sunni Arab resentment and a related insurgency, as well as growing sectarian violence. According to its November 30, 2005, “Strategy for Victory,” the Bush Administration indicates that U.S. forces will remain in Iraq until the country is able to provide for its own security and does not serve as a host for radical Islamic terrorists. The Administration believes that, over the longer term, Iraq will become a model for reform throughout the Middle East and a partner in the global war on terrorism. However, mounting casualties and costs — and growing sectarian conflict — have intensified a debate within the United States over the wisdom of the invasion and whether to wind down U.S. involvement without completely accomplishing U.S. goals. The Bush Administration asserts that U.S. policy in Iraq is showing important successes, demonstrated by two elections (January and December 2005) that chose an interim and then a full-term National Assembly, a referendum that adopted a permanent constitution (October 15, 2005), progress in building Iraq’s security forces, and economic growth. While continuing to build, equip, and train Iraqi security units, the Administration has been working to include more Sunni Arabs in the power structure, particularly the security institutions; Sunnis were dominant during the regime of Saddam Hussein but now feel marginalized by the newly dominant Shiite Arabs and Kurds.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-12-14 Situation Report
    Iraq Situation Report: December 19-21, 2014 1 On December 20, Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga forces, supported by the Syrian 5 On December 20, ISIS attacked Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) stationed Kurdish PYD People’s Protection Units (YPG) and Iraqi Yazidi ghters, in areas in Haditha in western Anbar. e clashes took place in the areas engaged the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) inside the center of Sinjar of Sin al-ib and al-Sagra. e attack was repelled and French airstrikes in western Ninewa province. By December 21, these combined forces moved supported the ISF. On December, Haditha’s mayor, Abdul Hakim inside Sinjar district and retook several neighborhoods inside the city. ese al-Jughai, called for coalition airstrikes to target ISIS in the Khasfa area operations were supported by airstrikes from the international anti-ISIS which he indicated as a staging area for the next ISIS attack into coalition. Haditha. Dahuk 2 On December 20, the governor of Salah ad-Din stated that 6 On December 20, ISIS attacked ISF forces near the Baghdadi ISIS has launched a major attack inside Baiji district in Salah Mosul Dam area in Anbar province. ISIS launched the attacks from the Joba ad-Din province. is statement comes as the Iraqi 1 3 Bridge and from northern Hit. e attack was repelled, but a Security Forces (ISF) engaged ISIS in the middle of Mosul Arbil tribal leader stated that ISIS now controls the Joba and Sayad central Baiji; Iraqi military reinforcements are reported areas in northern Baghdadi. On December 21, a local ocial to have arrived in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH CLUSTER EMERGENCY RESPONSE IRAQ Monthly Dashboard (March 2019)
    HEALTH CLUSTER EMERGENCY RESPONSE IRAQ Monthly Dashboard (March 2019) 1 FUNDING INFORMATION TREATMENT OF COMMON HEALTH Zakho Al-Amedi Al-Zibar DISEASES PARTNERS SumelDahuk Akre Rawanduz Tal Afar TilkaefSheikhan Shaqlawa Sinjar Al-Hamdaniya Pshdar 1 Rania 6.1M Al-Mosul Erbil 2019 Funded KoysinjaqDokan 22 Makhmour Penjwin Partners Reported Al-Ba'aj Dibis Sharbazher 96K 133K Al-Shirqat Jan 2019 Al-Hatra Kirkuk Al-Sulaymaniya Men Women Al-Hawiga Chamchamal Halabja Daquq Darbandihkan Kalar 15 International NGO Baiji Tikrit Tuz Kifri Al-Daur 304K 7 Local NGO Ana Khanaqin Consultations Haditha Samarra 40K Al-Ka'im Al-Khalis 34.7K Balad Al-Muqdadiya Heet Boys Girls Al-AdhamiyaBa'quba Al-Kadhmiyah Baladruz Al-Mada'en $60.9M Al-RamadiAl-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya Badra Al-Suwaira Required Al-Musayab 37K 45K Al-Rutba Al-Mahaweel Ain Al-TamurKerbala Al-Kut Laboratory investigations % of water samples Al-HashimiyaAl-Namaniya Ali Al-Gharbi conducted Al-Hindiya from health facilities Al-Hilla Al-Hai Al-Amara that failed chemical Al-KufaAl-DiwaniyaAfaq and biological test Al-Kahla Al-Shamiya Al-Rifai Al-Hamza Al-Manathera Al-Rumaitha Al-MaimounaQalat Saleh Al-Shatra Al-Mejar Al-Kabir Al-Samawa REACHED TARGET Al-Najaf Al-Khidhir Nassriya Al-Qurna Suq Al-ShoyokhAl-Chibayish Shatt Al-Arab 527.9K Al-Basrah Number of Partners Abu Al-Khaseeb Al-Zubair 6 - 12 Al-Salman Al-Fao 31% 1.7M 3 - 6 0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 1 - 3 IMMUNIZATION NUTRITION 3,214 1,030 198 79 7,060 3,213 3,432 No. of children under 5 No.
    [Show full text]
  • EMT-1 Trauma Stabilization Point for Mosul and Tal Afar
    EMT-1 Trauma Stabilization Point for Mosul and Tal Afar New York City Medics Sub-Contract Global Response Management Final Report 1: March 1, 2017 to October 31st, 2017 About the Project: Global Response Management (GRM) volunteers began treating patients at the frontline of the conflict of Mosul in January 2017. We continued and strengthened already established relationships with the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF) medical teams. Our EMT-1 TSP had the required certified staff experienced in the elements of initial trauma care: triage on a mass scale, wound and basic fracture management, pain management, fluid resuscitation, ATLS skills, basic emergency care of pediatric and adult trauma. We worked under the guidelines of the World Health Organization’s 2013 publication Classification and Minimum Standards for Foreign Medical Teams in Sudden Onset Disasters. During the conflicts of Mosul, Tal Afar, and Hawija, GRM provided 24-hour, front line trauma stabilization, contributed to referral pathways, coordinated the transport of patients to higher levels of care; assessed new TSP locations; collected patient medical and demographic data for affiliated NGOs; transported, distributed and maintained stocks of medical supplies; maintained TSP facility functionality, security, and working condition; and coordinated with other facilities and TSPs in the conflict. Organizationally, we had full time employees including Country Director, Office Manager, Volunteer Coordinator and Communications Director in Erbil. While in the field, GRM kept a Team Lead, a local registered Doctor, Data Monitoring Officer and Translator at the TSP aside from the four or more paramedic or above, certified professionals volunteering there. From January 19 through July 22, 2017, we operated two Trauma Stabilization Points (TSP) as the battle advanced throughout East and West Mosul, relocating as per needs assessment and security assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tal Afar 2005: Laying the Counterinsurgency Groundwork by MAJ Jay B
    Tal Afar 2005: Laying the Counterinsurgency Groundwork By MAJ Jay B. Baker he battle for Tal Afar, which occurred during the period from summer 2005 to winter 2006, was the first success- Tful counterinsurgency campaign for American forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). The principal antagonists were the 3rd Ar- mored Cavalry Regiment (ACR), also known as the Brave Rifles, led by COL H.R. McMaster, and the insurgency forces in Tal Afar. The campaign emphasized principles of full spectrum opera- tions, including initiative, mission command and the simultaneous application of offensive, defensive and stability operations. A soldier from 2nd Battalion, 325th Airborne Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division, patrols the streets of Tal Afar, a city of some 200,000 in northwestern Iraq’s Ninewah Province, in November 2005. U.S. Army/SPC Richard Vogt Army/SPC Richard U.S. June 2009 I ARMY 61 A U.S. Army OH-58D Kiowa helicopter from the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment (ACR) conducts a combat air patrol over the ancient city of Tal Afar in February 2006. Allmon, USAF Aaron Aaron DoD/SSgt Strategic Setting Iraq. Upon taking command of 3rd ACR in 2004 following Tal Afar is an ancient city of approximately 200,000 peo- its redeployment from Operation Iraqi Freedom I, COL ple in northwestern Iraq’s Ninewah Province, near the Syr- McMaster implemented a training strategy based on clas- ian border. It figured prominently in Abu Musab al-Zar- sic counterinsurgency doctrine, including cultural training qawi’s strategy of fomenting sectarian violence to and emphasis on intelligence, information operations and undermine the American effort in Iraq due to its ethnic civil affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining the Character of Urban Operations for the U.S. Army: How the Past Can Inform the Present and Future
    C O R P O R A T I O N Reimagining the Character of Urban Operations for the U.S. Army How the Past Can Inform the Present and Future Gian Gentile, David E. Johnson, Lisa Saum-Manning, Raphael S. Cohen, Shara Williams, Carrie Lee, Michael Shurkin, Brenna Allen, Sarah Soliman, James L. Doty III For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1602 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9607-4 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The history of human conflict suggests that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • “Barriers to Post-ISIS Reconciliation in Iraq: Case Study of Tel Afar, Ninewa” by Sarah Sanbar Under the Supervision of Prof
    “Barriers to post-ISIS reconciliation in Iraq: Case study of Tel Afar, Ninewa” By Sarah Sanbar Under the supervision of Professor Stéphane Lacroix Sciences Po Spring 2020 This paper has received the Kuwait Program at Sciences Po Student Paper Award The copyright of this paper remains the property of its author. No part of the content may be reproduced, published, distributed, copied or stored for public or private use without written permission of the author. All authorisation requests should be sent to [email protected] BARRIERS TO POST-ISIS RECONCILIATION IN IRAQ Case Study of Tel Afar, Ninewa Instructor: Stéphane LACROIX Final Assignment: The Political Sociology of the State in the Contemporary Arab World Date: 30/04/2020 Sarah Sanbar Sanbar - 1 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Literature Review ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Case Study: Tel Afar, Ninewa .................................................................................................................... 5 Context and Demographics ....................................................................................................................... 5 ISIS Occupation, Displacement, and the Liberation Operation ................................................................ 6 Barriers to Post-ISIS Reconciliation in Tel
    [Show full text]
  • A/Hrc/Res/S-22/1
    United Nations A/HRC/RES/S-22/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 3 September 2014 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty-second special session 1 September 2014 Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council S-22/1 The human rights situation in Iraq in the light of abuses committed by the so-called Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant and associated groups The Human Rights Council, Guided by the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other relevant international human rights law instruments, Recalling Security Council resolutions 1373 (2001) of 28 September 2001, 1618 (2005) of 4 August 2005, 1624 (2005) of 14 September 2005, 2169 (2014) of 30 July 2014 and 2170 (2014) of 15 August 2014, General Assembly resolution 60/288 of 8 October 2006 and Human Rights Council resolutions 10/15 of 26 March 2009 and 13/26 of 26 March 2010, as well as all other relevant United Nations resolutions, Reaffirming its commitment to the sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity of Iraq within its internationally recognized borders, Welcoming the various statements issued byy the Security Council, the Secretary- General, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Iraq, in which they noted the enormity of the atrocities committed by the so-called Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant and associated terrorist groups, and in which they stated that such atrocities may amount to crimes against humanity, involving unlawful killing, sexual violence
    [Show full text]
  • Regaining Western Mosul: Consequences and Implications
    Regaining Western Mosul: Consequences and Implications Abdulwahab Al-Qassab1 March 1, 2017 Since October 2016, the Iraqi government, supported by the US military, has waged one of its most difficult battles to regain the important city of Mosul. The previous government of former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki had opted to leave the city without a fight three years ago, when Maliki ordered three Iraqi army and security divisions to withdraw, leaving their brand new heavy armaments to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). This was a strange, ambiguous, and indeed treasonous decision for which neither Maliki nor any of his commanders were held responsible or accountable. It is still not clear if there will be an open and public investigation. What is known is that 35 high-level political and military leaders, including Maliki, have not paid for the dismal Mosul failure of 2014. Indeed, 11 of those have already fled the country and rumors abound about a cover-up. The Mosul Decision After three years, the Haider al-Abadi government decided to proceed with plans to regain the largest Sunni Arab city in Iraq, and its second largest city overall. The United States extended both technology and advice to the Iraqi military and security forces along with the needed air cover and support, without which the aim of regaining the city would have been very difficult. The complications that previously faced the operation to regain Mosul continue to impact the military and humanitarian situations. The role of the Shiite militia, the People’s Mobilization Forces (PMF), is still perceived with apprehension by the Sunni population of Mosul and the surrounding tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Fallujah: Lessons Learned on Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT) in the 21St Century
    The Battle of Fallujah: Lessons Learned on Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT) in the 21st Century Tao-Hung Chang, 2008 Advised by Maj. K. T. Saunders Department of Naval Science ilitary operations on urbanized terrain (MOUT) is and to gain more international attention, as many Westerners defined by the Department of Defense (DoD) as resided in foreign settlements of Shanghai. The Chinese fought M“all [operations] planned and conducted across the the Japanese Special Marines and the 3rd Fleet in Shanghai range of military operations on, or against objectives within, a for more than three months with many modernized combined topographical complex and its adjacent natural terrain, where arms including tanks, artillery, air crafts, and torpedo boats. man-made construction or the density of noncombatants are Despite the heavy casualties, Chinese infantry were able to the dominant feature.”1 An urban environment features three break through the Japanese defenses many times with German main characteristics: a complex man-made physical terrain; a Stormtroop Tactics (die Stosstrupp Taktik) under the command population of significant size and density; and an infrastructure of a German advisory group led by General Alexander von that supports the population and perhaps the region or nation.2 Falkenhausen, but failed to hold their positions due to intense With the continuous growth of urbanization all around Japanese naval gunfire support.5 The fighting in the foreign the world (based on a World Bank study, 79% of the world settlements in Shanghai demonstrated, for the first time, the population lived in an urbanized environment in 2002)3 and devastating effects that modern warfare had in urban sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Sectarian and Ethnic Violence and the Evolving Insurgency
    F Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax: 1 (202) 457 -8746 Email: [email protected] Iraq’s Sectarian and Ethnic Violence and the Evolving Insurgency Developments through late -January 2007 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chai r in Strategy [email protected] With the Assistance of Emma Davies Updated: January 26, 2007 Cordesman: Iraq’s Sectarian and Ethnic Violence 1/26/07 Page 2 Executive Summary The insurgency in Iraq has become a “war after the war” that threa tens to divide the country and create a full -scale civil conflict. It has triggered sectarian and ethnic violence that dominates the struggle to reshape Iraq as a modern state, has emerged as a growing threat to the Gulf region, and has become linked to th e broader struggle between Sunni and Shi’ite Islamist extremism, and moderation and reform, throughout the Islamic world. Since its inception in the spring of 2003, the nature of the fighting in Iraq has evolved from a struggle between Coalition forces and former regime loyalists to a much more diffuse conflict, involving a number of Sunni groups, Shi’ite militias, and foreign jihadists, and which has spread to become a widespread civil conflict. In the process, the complex patterns of conflict in Iraq ha ve become a broad struggle for sectarian and ethnic control of political and economic space. Open violence has become steadily more serious, but it is only part of the story.
    [Show full text]