Regional Conflict Artical Name : What Does the Quick Finalization of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Conflict Artical Name : What Does the Quick Finalization of The Artical Name : Regional Conflict Artical Subject : What does the Quick Finalization of the Battle of Tal Afar Mean? Publish Date: 03/09/2017 Auther Name: Dr. Muthana Al-Obeidi Subject : 10/1/2021 12:29:11 PM 1 / 2 Unlike the expectations of the international coalition to combat terrorism, Iraqi forces finalized the battle of liberating Tal Afar quickly and with limited losses compared to other confrontations against ISIS in other Iraqi cities and towns, which the organization has controlled since June 2014. The battle of Tal Afar lasted only for few days, after Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi announced launching military operations on August 20, 2017 ±that is more than a month after finalizing the battle of liberating Mosul. Although the Iraqi army retrieved most of Tal Afar¶s neighborhoods and areas, ISIS is still stationed in some areas on the Iraqi-Syrian borders, which stretch for 605 kilometers. ISIS members also launched a surprise attack against Iraqi forces stationed in Tal Afar.Why Tal Afar? The Tal Afar district is in the Nineveh governorate in North Iraq, 70 kilometers west of Mosul. It is also close to the Iraqi borders with Syria. Zummar, Rabia and al-Ayadieh are three sub districts of Nineveh. To the east lies the Mosul district, to the north lies the Dohuk district, to the west lies the Sinjar district and to the south lies Al-Hadar district. It is the second largest district in the governorate as Mosul is the largest. Its society is diverse as ethnically there are Arabs and Turkmen, and religiously there are Sunnis and Shi¶ites. The Turkmen represent the majority of the population in the city. Liberating the city from ISIS is significant, because the city was the last ISIS stronghold in Nineveh. Tal Afar was also one of ISIS¶most important strongholds, as it is located on the supply routes between Mosul and Syria. Controlling the city will allow Iraqi troops to control the borders between Iraq and Syria.A number of ISIS commanders are actually from the city. After Mosul was liberated, hundreds of the organization members fled to it. The city is also considered an axis of the Iranian-Turkish regional struggle over influence in North Iraq.Participating TroopsSince liberating Tal Afar was of paramount significance, a large number of factions and units participated in liberating the city, since their expertise after liberating Mosul and in besieging ISIS members was highly needed. The most important troops and factions, which participated in the offensive are:1. The Iraqi army including the 9th armored division, the 15th and 16th divisions, the artillery battalions and the army¶s engineering and medical departments.2. Counter-terrorism forces affiliated with the first and second special operations¶unit.3. A number of the federal policemen affiliated with the armored division, the special elite force and the 6th division.4. Popular mobilization battalions including 5,000 fighters from Tal Afar itself.5. Iraqi air force in cooperation with the US-led international coalition air force.Field DevelopmentsThe Tal Afar offensive was launched on August 20, 2017. Joint Iraqi troops advanced in some areas on the first day reaching 30 kilometers into the city. The plan was to break through ISIS frontlines so they can infiltrate the center of the city. Federal police troops liberated the small area of Al-Abra aided by the Iraqi army¶s air force.Three days after launching the offensive, Iraqi troops stormed the center of Tal Afar from the eastern, western and southern sides. Abdul Amir Rashid Yarallah, the Commander of the ³We Are Coming Nineveh´operations, said the 9th armored division and the battalions 2, 11 and 26 of the Popular Mobilization stormed Tal Afar from the eastern side, adding that the counter-terrorism forces stormed al-Kifah neighborhood, the city¶s first neighborhood. Other counter-terrorism troops stormed the city from the southwestern side aided by the artillery division and the air force.The federal police troops and the Popular Mobilization also managed to secure a vital passage for the troops north of Tal Afar and they stormed al-Tank neighborhood. By day 6, the joint forces advanced to the center of the city and seized control of a number of neighboring towns in the district. They also seized control of al-Moalemeen neighborhood and liberated large parts of al-Rabee and al-Saad neighborhoods. They also stormed al- Taliaa and al-Rabee neighborhoods after ISIS members retreated to other neighborhoods in the city and put concrete barricades to prevent Iraqi troops from advancing towards the center of the city.The Iraqi joint operations command announced on day 7 of the offensive that it seized control of the city¶s center and of its historical castle and groves, in addition to a number of villages. It also seized complete control over Sheikh Ibrahim Mountain and the Zumbar mountains and liberated al-Ouruba 2, al-Salam, Al- Qadissiya 1 and 2 and al-Rabee neighborhoods and the Hasan Kawi and al-Bawari areas. The counter-terrorism task force, which invaded the city from the southern axis, announced the end of its combat missions.The federal police, which raided the city from the northwestern axis also announced the end of its combat missions. Other troops participating in the fighting are about to do so as well now that 27 neighborhoods out of 29 have been liberated. The commander of the ³We Are Coming Nineveh´said ³military operations will continue until al-Ayadieh and surrounding areas are liberated.´Quick FinalizationThe battle to liberate Tal Afar from ISIS was short and more decisive, if compared with other battles fought by Iraqi troops to liberate other cities, which ISIS controlled, especially Mosul.The quick pace at which Tal Afar was liberated is because it is smaller and its population is less than that of Mosul, which is Iraq¶s second largest city. Tal Afar was liberated from the left side in a short time while the problem was in the right side, or what is known as the old city, which has narrow roads, adjacent roads and crowded neighborhoods. This was particularly difficult when ISIS besieged thousands of civilians in these neighborhoods and used them as human shields.On another hand, ISIS fiercely fought in Mosul considering it is the city from where it announced its alleged ³state.´It resorted to different approaches to recruit hundreds of fighters and resorted to street fighting, ambushes, mines, booby-trapped cars and snipers, in an attempt to maintain control over the city. Iraqi troops, however, achieved great victory and liberated it. Tal Afar, on the contrary, is different as it is less important for ISIS at this time when it is suffering from consecutive defeats. In addition to all that there are the increased experience and skills which Iraqi troops gained from fighting other battles, particularly Mosul¶s. This contributed to finalizing the Tal Afar battle at a quicker pace than other battles.Post-liberationThe quick liberation of Tal Afar from ISIS raises several questions about how to manage the post-liberation phase, deal with the diverse ethnic and sectarian components and resolve problems, which weakened the society against ISIS expansion.Although preliminary data pertaining to the post-liberation phase does not clearly indicate how the future will be, some matters show that Tal Afar will be an axis of struggle over regional influence, particularly amid the high demand for reconstruction requirements and the lack of available resources to do so given the austerity measures and decrease of oil prices.It is probable that Tal Afar will be a major point in the tensions between the Iraqi central government and the Kurdistan region¶s government, considering it is a disputed area and Kurdish political parties demand that it becomes a part of Kurdistan. This means that escalating the situation to control the city is a strong possibility.Finally, control over Tal Afar sparks a regional conflict between Turkey and Iran. Ankara seeks to control the city to protect the Turkmen in it and this pushed it to militarily intervene in Iraq and deploy its troops in the camp of Bashiqa. Meanwhile Tehran is adamant about controlling the city to protect the Shi¶ites to secure the passage that links between Tehran and Beirut. This increases the possibilities of reigniting the conflict between Iraqi factions and major regional troops that are closely related to Iraqi matters in order to control Tal Afar. 10/1/2021 12:29:11 PM 2 / 2.
Recommended publications
  • The Coming Turkish- Iranian Competition in Iraq
    UNITeD StateS INSTITUTe of Peace www.usip.org SPeCIAL RePoRT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPO R T Sean Kane This report reviews the growing competition between Turkey and Iran for influence in Iraq as the U.S. troop withdrawal proceeds. In doing so, it finds an alignment of interests between Baghdad, Ankara, and Washington, D.C., in a strong and stable Iraq fueled by increased hydrocarbon production. Where possible, the United States should therefore encourage The Coming Turkish- Turkish and Iraqi cooperation and economic integration as a key part of its post-2011 strategy for Iraq and the region. This analysis is based on the author’s experiences in Iraq and Iranian Competition reviews of Turkish and Iranian press and foreign policy writing. ABOUT THE AUTHO R in Iraq Sean Kane is the senior program officer for Iraq at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). He assists in managing the Institute’s Iraq program and field mission in Iraq and serves as the Institute’s primary expert on Iraq and U.S. policy in Iraq. Summary He previously worked for the United Nations Assistance Mission • The two rising powers in the Middle East—Turkey and Iran—are neighbors to Iraq, its for Iraq from 2006 to 2009. He has published on the subjects leading trading partners, and rapidly becoming the most influential external actors inside of Iraqi politics and natural resource negotiations. The author the country as the U.S. troop withdrawal proceeds. would like to thank all of those who commented on and provided feedback on the manuscript and is especially grateful • Although there is concern in Washington about bilateral cooperation between Turkey and to Elliot Hen-Tov for generously sharing his expertise on the Iran, their differing visions for the broader Middle East region are particularly evident in topics addressed in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq
    The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq Julie Ahn—Maeve Campbell—Pete Knoetgen Client: Office of Iraq Affairs, U.S. Department of State Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Advisor: Meghan O’Sullivan Policy Analysis Exercise Seminar Leader: Matthew Bunn May 7, 2018 This Policy Analysis Exercise reflects the views of the authors and should not be viewed as representing the views of the US Government, nor those of Harvard University or any of its faculty. Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to the many people who helped us throughout the development, research, and drafting of this report. Our field work in Iraq would not have been possible without the help of Sherzad Khidhir. His willingness to connect us with in-country stakeholders significantly contributed to the breadth of our interviews. Those interviews were made possible by our fantastic translators, Lezan, Ehsan, and Younis, who ensured that we could capture critical information and the nuance of discussions. We also greatly appreciated the willingness of U.S. State Department officials, the soldiers of Operation Inherent Resolve, and our many other interview participants to provide us with their time and insights. Thanks to their assistance, we were able to gain a better grasp of this immensely complex topic. Throughout our research, we benefitted from consultations with numerous Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) faculty, as well as with individuals from the larger Harvard community. We would especially like to thank Harvard Business School Professor Kristin Fabbe and Razzaq al-Saiedi from the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative who both provided critical support to our project.
    [Show full text]
  • Return Dynamics in Ninewa Governorate Return Dynamics in Ninewa Governorate May 2021
    RETURNRETURN INDEX GOVERNORATE GOVERNORATE PROFILING: PROFILING RETURN DYNAMICS IN NINEWA GOVERNORATE RETURN DYNAMICS IN NINEWA GOVERNORATE MAY 2021 The Return Index is a tool designed to measure the severity of presents the overview of conditions across the governorate at the conditions in locations of return. The Return Index is based on 16 end of 2020 with a comparison of figures and the severity of living indicators divided into two scales: Scale 1, on livelihoods and basic conditions over the course of 2020 (from 31 December 2019 to 31 services, and Scale 2, centered around social cohesion and safety December 2020). This section also outlines the areas of no return perceptions. A regression model is used to assess the impact of each recorded by the IOM’s Rapid Assessment and Response Teams of the indicators in facilitating or preventing returns. The index ranges (RARTs) and newly assessed locations, the returnee population from 0 (all essential conditions for return are met) to 100 (no essen- living in critical shelters and the displaced population hosted in the tial conditions for return are met). Higher scores denote more severe governorate. The second section devoted to the mass arrivals from living conditions for returnees. The scores of the severity index are camps due to its closures which began in mid-October pointing out grouped into three categories: low, medium and high (which also the living conditions of new arrivals either they returned to villages includes very high). Refer to the report “Methodological Overview” and neighbourhoods of their origin or arrived in new displacement for more details on the methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security
    Order Code RL31339 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security Updated March 29, 2006 Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security Summary Operation Iraqi Freedom succeeded in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, but Iraq remains violent and unstable because of Sunni Arab resentment and a related insurgency, as well as growing sectarian violence. According to its November 30, 2005, “Strategy for Victory,” the Bush Administration indicates that U.S. forces will remain in Iraq until the country is able to provide for its own security and does not serve as a host for radical Islamic terrorists. The Administration believes that, over the longer term, Iraq will become a model for reform throughout the Middle East and a partner in the global war on terrorism. However, mounting casualties and costs — and growing sectarian conflict — have intensified a debate within the United States over the wisdom of the invasion and whether to wind down U.S. involvement without completely accomplishing U.S. goals. The Bush Administration asserts that U.S. policy in Iraq is showing important successes, demonstrated by two elections (January and December 2005) that chose an interim and then a full-term National Assembly, a referendum that adopted a permanent constitution (October 15, 2005), progress in building Iraq’s security forces, and economic growth. While continuing to build, equip, and train Iraqi security units, the Administration has been working to include more Sunni Arabs in the power structure, particularly the security institutions; Sunnis were dominant during the regime of Saddam Hussein but now feel marginalized by the newly dominant Shiite Arabs and Kurds.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-12-14 Situation Report
    Iraq Situation Report: December 19-21, 2014 1 On December 20, Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga forces, supported by the Syrian 5 On December 20, ISIS attacked Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) stationed Kurdish PYD People’s Protection Units (YPG) and Iraqi Yazidi ghters, in areas in Haditha in western Anbar. e clashes took place in the areas engaged the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) inside the center of Sinjar of Sin al-ib and al-Sagra. e attack was repelled and French airstrikes in western Ninewa province. By December 21, these combined forces moved supported the ISF. On December, Haditha’s mayor, Abdul Hakim inside Sinjar district and retook several neighborhoods inside the city. ese al-Jughai, called for coalition airstrikes to target ISIS in the Khasfa area operations were supported by airstrikes from the international anti-ISIS which he indicated as a staging area for the next ISIS attack into coalition. Haditha. Dahuk 2 On December 20, the governor of Salah ad-Din stated that 6 On December 20, ISIS attacked ISF forces near the Baghdadi ISIS has launched a major attack inside Baiji district in Salah Mosul Dam area in Anbar province. ISIS launched the attacks from the Joba ad-Din province. is statement comes as the Iraqi 1 3 Bridge and from northern Hit. e attack was repelled, but a Security Forces (ISF) engaged ISIS in the middle of Mosul Arbil tribal leader stated that ISIS now controls the Joba and Sayad central Baiji; Iraqi military reinforcements are reported areas in northern Baghdadi. On December 21, a local ocial to have arrived in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH CLUSTER EMERGENCY RESPONSE IRAQ Monthly Dashboard (March 2019)
    HEALTH CLUSTER EMERGENCY RESPONSE IRAQ Monthly Dashboard (March 2019) 1 FUNDING INFORMATION TREATMENT OF COMMON HEALTH Zakho Al-Amedi Al-Zibar DISEASES PARTNERS SumelDahuk Akre Rawanduz Tal Afar TilkaefSheikhan Shaqlawa Sinjar Al-Hamdaniya Pshdar 1 Rania 6.1M Al-Mosul Erbil 2019 Funded KoysinjaqDokan 22 Makhmour Penjwin Partners Reported Al-Ba'aj Dibis Sharbazher 96K 133K Al-Shirqat Jan 2019 Al-Hatra Kirkuk Al-Sulaymaniya Men Women Al-Hawiga Chamchamal Halabja Daquq Darbandihkan Kalar 15 International NGO Baiji Tikrit Tuz Kifri Al-Daur 304K 7 Local NGO Ana Khanaqin Consultations Haditha Samarra 40K Al-Ka'im Al-Khalis 34.7K Balad Al-Muqdadiya Heet Boys Girls Al-AdhamiyaBa'quba Al-Kadhmiyah Baladruz Al-Mada'en $60.9M Al-RamadiAl-Falluja Al-Mahmoudiya Badra Al-Suwaira Required Al-Musayab 37K 45K Al-Rutba Al-Mahaweel Ain Al-TamurKerbala Al-Kut Laboratory investigations % of water samples Al-HashimiyaAl-Namaniya Ali Al-Gharbi conducted Al-Hindiya from health facilities Al-Hilla Al-Hai Al-Amara that failed chemical Al-KufaAl-DiwaniyaAfaq and biological test Al-Kahla Al-Shamiya Al-Rifai Al-Hamza Al-Manathera Al-Rumaitha Al-MaimounaQalat Saleh Al-Shatra Al-Mejar Al-Kabir Al-Samawa REACHED TARGET Al-Najaf Al-Khidhir Nassriya Al-Qurna Suq Al-ShoyokhAl-Chibayish Shatt Al-Arab 527.9K Al-Basrah Number of Partners Abu Al-Khaseeb Al-Zubair 6 - 12 Al-Salman Al-Fao 31% 1.7M 3 - 6 0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 1 - 3 IMMUNIZATION NUTRITION 3,214 1,030 198 79 7,060 3,213 3,432 No. of children under 5 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Protracted Displacement in Iraq: District of Origin Profiles
    PROTRACTED DISPLACEMENT IN IRAQ: DISTRICT OF ORIGIN PROFILES AUGUST 2021 IOM IRAQ The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. The information contained in this report is for general information purposes only. Names and boundaries on DTM information products do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. The information in the DTM portal and in this report is the result of data collected by IOM field teams and complements information provided and generated by governmental and other entities in Iraq. IOM Iraq endeavors to keep this information as up to date and accurate as possible, but makes no claim —expressed or implied— on the completeness, accuracy and suitability of the information provided through this report. Challenges that should be taken into account when using DTM data in Iraq include the fluidity of the displaced population movements along with repeated emergencies and limited or no access to parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • EMT-1 Trauma Stabilization Point for Mosul and Tal Afar
    EMT-1 Trauma Stabilization Point for Mosul and Tal Afar New York City Medics Sub-Contract Global Response Management Final Report 1: March 1, 2017 to October 31st, 2017 About the Project: Global Response Management (GRM) volunteers began treating patients at the frontline of the conflict of Mosul in January 2017. We continued and strengthened already established relationships with the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF) medical teams. Our EMT-1 TSP had the required certified staff experienced in the elements of initial trauma care: triage on a mass scale, wound and basic fracture management, pain management, fluid resuscitation, ATLS skills, basic emergency care of pediatric and adult trauma. We worked under the guidelines of the World Health Organization’s 2013 publication Classification and Minimum Standards for Foreign Medical Teams in Sudden Onset Disasters. During the conflicts of Mosul, Tal Afar, and Hawija, GRM provided 24-hour, front line trauma stabilization, contributed to referral pathways, coordinated the transport of patients to higher levels of care; assessed new TSP locations; collected patient medical and demographic data for affiliated NGOs; transported, distributed and maintained stocks of medical supplies; maintained TSP facility functionality, security, and working condition; and coordinated with other facilities and TSPs in the conflict. Organizationally, we had full time employees including Country Director, Office Manager, Volunteer Coordinator and Communications Director in Erbil. While in the field, GRM kept a Team Lead, a local registered Doctor, Data Monitoring Officer and Translator at the TSP aside from the four or more paramedic or above, certified professionals volunteering there. From January 19 through July 22, 2017, we operated two Trauma Stabilization Points (TSP) as the battle advanced throughout East and West Mosul, relocating as per needs assessment and security assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tal Afar 2005: Laying the Counterinsurgency Groundwork by MAJ Jay B
    Tal Afar 2005: Laying the Counterinsurgency Groundwork By MAJ Jay B. Baker he battle for Tal Afar, which occurred during the period from summer 2005 to winter 2006, was the first success- Tful counterinsurgency campaign for American forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). The principal antagonists were the 3rd Ar- mored Cavalry Regiment (ACR), also known as the Brave Rifles, led by COL H.R. McMaster, and the insurgency forces in Tal Afar. The campaign emphasized principles of full spectrum opera- tions, including initiative, mission command and the simultaneous application of offensive, defensive and stability operations. A soldier from 2nd Battalion, 325th Airborne Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division, patrols the streets of Tal Afar, a city of some 200,000 in northwestern Iraq’s Ninewah Province, in November 2005. U.S. Army/SPC Richard Vogt Army/SPC Richard U.S. June 2009 I ARMY 61 A U.S. Army OH-58D Kiowa helicopter from the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment (ACR) conducts a combat air patrol over the ancient city of Tal Afar in February 2006. Allmon, USAF Aaron Aaron DoD/SSgt Strategic Setting Iraq. Upon taking command of 3rd ACR in 2004 following Tal Afar is an ancient city of approximately 200,000 peo- its redeployment from Operation Iraqi Freedom I, COL ple in northwestern Iraq’s Ninewah Province, near the Syr- McMaster implemented a training strategy based on clas- ian border. It figured prominently in Abu Musab al-Zar- sic counterinsurgency doctrine, including cultural training qawi’s strategy of fomenting sectarian violence to and emphasis on intelligence, information operations and undermine the American effort in Iraq due to its ethnic civil affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining the Character of Urban Operations for the U.S. Army: How the Past Can Inform the Present and Future
    C O R P O R A T I O N Reimagining the Character of Urban Operations for the U.S. Army How the Past Can Inform the Present and Future Gian Gentile, David E. Johnson, Lisa Saum-Manning, Raphael S. Cohen, Shara Williams, Carrie Lee, Michael Shurkin, Brenna Allen, Sarah Soliman, James L. Doty III For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1602 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9607-4 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The history of human conflict suggests that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • “Barriers to Post-ISIS Reconciliation in Iraq: Case Study of Tel Afar, Ninewa” by Sarah Sanbar Under the Supervision of Prof
    “Barriers to post-ISIS reconciliation in Iraq: Case study of Tel Afar, Ninewa” By Sarah Sanbar Under the supervision of Professor Stéphane Lacroix Sciences Po Spring 2020 This paper has received the Kuwait Program at Sciences Po Student Paper Award The copyright of this paper remains the property of its author. No part of the content may be reproduced, published, distributed, copied or stored for public or private use without written permission of the author. All authorisation requests should be sent to [email protected] BARRIERS TO POST-ISIS RECONCILIATION IN IRAQ Case Study of Tel Afar, Ninewa Instructor: Stéphane LACROIX Final Assignment: The Political Sociology of the State in the Contemporary Arab World Date: 30/04/2020 Sarah Sanbar Sanbar - 1 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Literature Review ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Case Study: Tel Afar, Ninewa .................................................................................................................... 5 Context and Demographics ....................................................................................................................... 5 ISIS Occupation, Displacement, and the Liberation Operation ................................................................ 6 Barriers to Post-ISIS Reconciliation in Tel
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Protection of Civilians in the Non International Armed Conflict in Iraq: 5 June – 5 July 2014
    HUMAN RIGHTS UNITED NATIONS Assistance Office of the High Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) Commissioner for Human Human Rights Office Rights 8) We assume )? Report on the Protection of Civilians in the Non International Armed Conflict in Iraq: 5 June – 5 July 2014 Ma Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................... i! Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1! Background ........................................................................................................................... 2! Legal framework on the Protection of Civilians in Non-International Armed Conflict ...... 4! Impact of the conflict on civilians ........................................................................................ 7! Violations committed by ISIL and associated armed groups ............................................... 9! Violations committed by the Government of Iraq security forces & affiliated forces ....... 14! Violations and abuses committed by unknown perpetrators .............................................. 16! Effect of conflict on vulnerable groups .............................................................................. 18! Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................... 21 Summary The non-international armed conflict that commenced in Iraq in Anbar governorate
    [Show full text]